yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Motorola Droid RAZR] beastie-boy:
J.Y.Daddy's CWM-on-boot also works with this touch recovery.
[Motorola Droid RAZR] gradshemi:
cwm recovery problem

Is anyone else getting the error E:signature verification failed? if so could someone walk me through it thank you
[Motorola Droid RAZR] runner1717:
Does this work on the .211 OTA?

Mike
[Motorola Droid RAZR] J.Y.Daddy:
This package don't use anymore on official ICS.

Now, please use whirleyes's BootMenu on official ICS. ;)

If you have GSM Razr, use whirleyes's BootMenu.

If you have CDMA Razr, use hashcode's Safestrap.

Thanks for users.
[Motorola Droid RAZR] circleofomega:
Download: Removed

Why?

"This package don't use anymore on official ICS.

Now, please use whirleyes's BootMenu on official ICS"

can someone explain??
[Motorola Droid RAZR] J.Y.Daddy:
BootMenu is wonderful. :good:

if you using gsm razr, try to BootMenu features. :D
[Motorola Droid RAZR] HSD-Pilot:
It's not compatible with ICS and Bootmenu is a lot better to handle. Meanwhile I'm used to it and don't wanna miss it anymore.

Gesendet von meinem XT910 mit Tapatalk 2
[Motorola Droid RAZR] circleofomega:
boot menu is when the phone is on..recovery is when u are about to boot right? how can they be the same?

BTW: came here for touch recovery..is it the same?
[Motorola Droid RAZR] nespresso33:
Try Bootmenu and you will understand...
[Motorola Droid RAZR] rogmar:
I'm on ICS 676.226.3.XT910.Retail.en.EU and when i try to add installer it says in red

"Not enough free space,Please clean/preinstall partition"

How do i go about cleaning the partition?
[Motorola Droid RAZR] rudkar:
Hey, i've got the same issue and same problem. How to done it right a install corectly?
[Motorola Droid RAZR] lazer9:
Same issue here. :mad:
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dellaclearing:
Hi everyone.

I bought an MHL cable to hook my Galxy S II up to my HDTV thinking I could watch HD videos on my big screen.

This works fine for a video file I've already downloaded to my phone, but I subscribe to an online live sports streaming website that shows events in up to 720p resolutions. All the streams are rtmpt Flash based embedded players, unfortunately when I tried this I could only view the videos at the S2's native resolution, which scaled up to 40 inches looked terrible!

Also, I've tried loads of browsers from the market, but regardless of if I use 3G, H+ or high speed home wifi they all stutter/lag every 10 seconds or so, which tells me it's the phone, not the connection. If I tether my phone to my PC, I can watch the streams fine which again tells me that it's the phone and not a connection speed issue.

I'd like to know if there's an app that will detect when you play an embedded video stream and give you the option of viewing it in another player that can handle higher resolutions than the browsers can?

I've seen apps like JetVD which do this for YouTube videos with 720p resolutions but can't find anything that will work with other streaming video websites. A little help please? MHL cable is pretty useless to me otherwise!

Thanks in advance!
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] fuss132:
---

Woops wrong category, sorry ^^ Please move it to general :)

---

Hey guys,

as you can see, I´m back :D And it´s my first target to fix the massive battery drain on Miui. The first thing I do is to compile a new kernel for Miui, but I need your help, too.

I have to locate the application that uses the battery most, so please go to Settings -> System -> Battery Settings , make a screenshot of it and post it in this thread. If you have the time to, please use Spare Parts, too and also make a screenshot of the battery usage.

Thanks for your help! :)

fuss132

PS: Of course you should run Miui and not CM7 like I did in the example picture :D

Example:
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] HeathenMan:
whats about better battery stats, cpu spy , batterylive and spare parts screens? whats the best for you? i will post all if needed :cool:

screens v8.5

BatteryLive

http://img843.imageshack.us/img843/3222/shot000028b.png

CPU Spy

http://imageshack.us/g/594/shot000022.png/

Spare Parts

http://imageshack.us/g/213/shot000019.png/

System

http://imageshack.us/g/405/shot000011.png/

Detailed WiFi, Android OS, Android System, Media Server

(at system)

http://imageshack.us/g/833/shot000030.png/

​
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] shriom_manerker:
its android system in miui (all versions) it gets about 40%+ when normal use ! if u barely uses it it goes way above 50% ! sorry cant provide a screenshot since m on ddkp3 crom now !
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] fuss132:
Well, BatteryMonitor and SpareParts are pretty usefull, too. If you have the time to it would be a big help for me :)
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] NerdiestGeek:
Will edit this post in about 5 minutes with the required screenies. Good to have you back fuss :) good luck.

edit1: Android System eating up the most battery on normal usage. Getting screenies for you now...

Edit2: new find, alarm manager is using up random battery. I don't use alarms. o.O Uploading screenies, sorry slow internet :(

Sorry couldn't do spare parts cos I'm charging.. just started a few minutes ago D:
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] varunthapliyal999:
At the moment I drained my battery with games so it wont provide you with the correct stats (I guess) Charging it now will post the screenshots asap :)
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] HeathenMan:
what are you needing from battery monitor?? it display the same as spare parts and system^^

updated previous post.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] ganeshbiyer:
My Battery Stats
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] HeathenMan:
damn! xda needs spoiler so bad....

it'll be better to upload all images at imageshack.us album (?) or some other way which dont need that much scrolling
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] narecords:
Battery is normal for me (or not?)

Hi, as soon as I finish the full charge, i'll post some screens.

Personally, i think i'm not having this problem. Battery lasts for a day and a half with a normal-heavy use.

Salut!
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] nitinvaid:
Fuss don't forget the vibrator its too week
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] behnameb7:
pls fix all miui rom problem :D
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] manu1991:
Ever since I turned off overclock and switched to 2G only mode and switched to 1000 max with interactiveX and bfq governors; I get very good battery life. 1.5 days on heavy usage. 2 days on moderate and 2.5 days on light.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] ybyb:
did u install any battery saving app e.g. juicedefender ?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] manu1991:
Nope nothing. IMO its HSDPA which is causing a lot of battery drain.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] luiseteyo:
Fuss, I wouldn't like to difficult more your work, but I have to say that yesterday with MIUI V9 + VurrutKer v2 + MAX 1000 MIN 300 + sio + SmartassV2 I got an awesome battery life. Here in the forum people usually have like 2 day battery in MIUI ROM but I don't. I have to charge it every night and yesterday I was in 53% when I went to bed. Awesome. Hope it helps. Thank you
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] jesrani:
I am having lot of battery drain. Are you using Set CPU and No Frills CPU or only one of them?

Edit : Tried to flash Vurrut v2 but got stuck on Samsung Logo. Now flashing v3 is alo not working
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] HeathenMan:
im using cpu control from aroma installer, in my oppinion much better then set cpu or no frills - if you want a choice between them let me say that no frills is reacting faster and it didnt use that much memory.

at moment vurrut 1 is my favorite because its stable ;)
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] narecords:
Batt stats

There is my stats. 1d 8h of normal-heavy use...

Salut!
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] loukalok:


It is so serious

Drain in 3hrs

35%~8%

I will post it soon
[Defy Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] vkpardava:
Hi I brought new motorola defy+ recently. and after two days it has started giving issues. It gets restarted any time. no fix pattern is found for this issue. it gets restarted on randomly interval.

Anyone can you please let me know solution to this issue?

Thanks in advance

Waiting for answers or any pointers.
[Defy Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] slstr:
use the forum search function to find answers to you questions

here is one of several search result on problem with reboot or restart of defy/defy+

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1336331
[Motorola Photon 4G] pgriffinsc:
Is there a stock rooted rom for the Photon, that can be flash in bootstrap?

Also,are there any flashable zips of the DX or D3 status bars icons floating around?
[Motorola Photon 4G] w0lf215:
AFAIK there are no flashable .zip's of stock roms. There are ones that are Blur based, but not actual straight stock. In order to go back to a stock on you would have to either nandroid back or sbf and then root.
[Bada Software and Hacking General] ferrloz:
hello, nobody has any idea of tools for the Wave 723 ReMaker and trix do not work either the stune.:confused::confused:
[Bada Software and Hacking General] adfree:
:confused:

What exactly NOT work?

Alternate Tool instead sTune is TkFileExplorer_2.4.exe

But as I remember maybe correct, only some settings need to change in menu... for proper work.

Best Regards
[Bada Software and Hacking General] ferrloz:
Thank you very much mate Adfree:)

I have entered it the internal menu:

1. * # 7092463 * #

2. 3 Device test

3. 6 Common

4. 3 USB Configuration

5. 1-On TkFilexplorer

and we agree with the button then hang Ajutes, Connectivity, select USB Utilities Debugging USB 1.06 and ready stune recognizes internal files, patience takes a few seconds to load all the files.:D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] spiritcrusher33:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B006ZQL6NS/ref=ox_sc_act_title_3?ie=UTF8&m=A3UKFU9C04UXZ9

Just wondering.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] NR017:
Not sure but HOLY HELL that's one expensive battery. The most I've seen was $50+
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] tefloncoated:
There is a MUCH better alternative to that one on Amazon for about 20 bucks + $4.99 shipping: http://amzn.to/xtT3Sf

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=22752635#post22752635
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] spiritcrusher33:
Ive always had good luck with seidio and mugen batteries. little worried bout those cheaper solutions on amazon. etc.. plus i have the white note. so the white mugen would look better.. I guess i could order, and if it doesnt work, just return it, lol
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] tefloncoated:
I hear you about being cautions. I am the same way about the cheap eBay knock offs. But this is from an Amazon vendor (somewhat better selection criteria and overall support) and based on my experience - i've been using the Hyperion batteries for a while now - they are just as good as Mugen. I was just pointing out a few alternatives for folks that might be reading this later...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] randaddy:
I'm assuming none of the current N7000 Extended batteries will work on the AT&T Note since N7000 Battery covers don't fit and that's what these extended battery covers are molded after.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] BigBison420:
I've heard this on numerous occasions also. I would wait to buy one made to fit "i717" - I believe the back covers are different.

---------- Post added at 11:41 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:39 AM ----------

Here is one account where they dont fit

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1509093

ALSO, you will lose NFC capability since NFC is mounted to the back cover :mad:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] spiritcrusher33:
Found this..

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0077EIDCE/ref=gno_cart_title_3

And it states.

Technical Details

Extend your talk time on your Samsung Galaxy Note (At&t SGH-i717, GT-N7000 or i9220).

5000 mAh Battery Capacity (with Extended Back Cover).

Batteries use Hyperion Accessories "A" Grade Lithium Ion Cells.

Designed and Manufactured by Hyperion Electronics Accessories.

› See more technical details

Hum maybe i should pull the trigger on it, and see. alot cheaper than the mugen..plus i could always trim the things on the door to make it fit like someone else did...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] NR017:
Let me know how the battery is. I'm looking at the battery without the back cover..
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] BigBison420:
Get it bro... i want too.. i've heard another forum a couple guys say they get a full day with it, and thats with HEAVY USAGE.

Or get juicedefender... i went from 6hrs to about a full day. turns off data when screen goes off and push data checks every 15 minutes. that will keep you happy in the meantime. im a heavy user too!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] gtnote:
Yoobao power banks

keep your phone slim and sleek as possible and still carry plenty of juice on the go. they come in 4800mah 6600mah 11200mah and charge anything the uses a USB cable to charge

http://www.kevikev.com/Samsung-Galaxy-Note-Cases-Batteries-Accessories_c24.htm
[Touch HD General] zlabra:
Hi i read this complete threat and i didn't find solution

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=647030

I have HTC Touch hd with windows mobile 6.1

I bought myself complete new card Kingston micro sdhc V4 8G

I installed android on sd card

It worked for the first time only, also android boot normaly, they i try with new version now i always get "waiting for sd card" when boot, i tryed to change default, also format it.... nothing help

Kingston 8g should work... because it worked before.. strange...

any help?

Sorry for posting in this :/

Regards
[Touch HD General] zlabra:
found solution after 3 days, HP USB Disk, use normal format, not fast, it fix all sc cards ;) no more waiting for sd card
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] Felisek:
There have been quite a few threads on Prime's WiFi speed. However, I believe no-one has done a test, results of which I show below. I wanted to compare WiFi speed of the Prime and my Dell laptop. Speedtest.net measures internet speed, which is bound to fluctuate as server load and access time change. So, I decided to measure things locally. The methodology is as follows.

First, I created five text files with randomly generated ASCII characters. Each of these files was 50 Mb (52428800 bytes) in size. Then, I placed them on a local HTTP server. Since I don't have any program/app both on Windows/Android to precisely measure download time/speed, I used a simplified approach, consistent on both devices. I opened Chrome browser and measured how long it takes to download each file using a stopwatch. I did not ask Chrome to "save as" file, as it can start pre-loading the file before I confirm. I created a simple web page with links to all five files and clicked them one by one, waiting until entire file was open in the window. I simply watched the indicator in the tab, until it stopped spinning. By using five separate files I avoided problems with caching. In order to rule out any trend in our local server speed, I alternated the files, downloading the first file to the Dell and then to the Prime, then the second file and so on.

This is not the most accurate method, but sufficient enough for this purpose. I repeated the experiment five times, so I could estimate measurement errors. The results (download time, in seconds) are presented below:

Dell Latitude E6500 with Windows 7, 4 GB RAM

Transformer Prime, S/N C10KAS######, build .14

Dell Prime

----------

39.4 101.0

37.1 102.4

40.8 101.7

38.7 102.8

38.9 100.0

which converted into speeds (Mbytes / s) gives:

Dell Prime

----------

1.27 0.495

1.35 0.488

1.23 0.492

1.29 0.486

1.26 0.500

As you can see, there is not much variability in either sample, and the mean speed (with standard error) is 1.28(0.02) and 0.492(0.002) Mbytes per second, for Dell and Prime, respectively. Ergo, the Dell is about 2.6 times faster downloading (large) files than the Prime.

I leave the reason for this rather huge difference open to discussion. Is it the WiFi adapter in the Prime? Is it processor speed? Memory? Storage? I don't know. The fact is that download speeds on my Prime are much slower than on my Dell.

I haven't done experiment like this before .14 upgrade, so I have no idea how it looked like before.

Edit: In the follow-up to the discussion below I have done internet speed tests. This is all done on a fast university network, which shows speeds of up to 500 Mbps, when measured from a wired desktop. The result is interesting: both laptop and the Prime show similar speeds of about 2.3 Mbytes/s. This is much faster than local download speed. I can only guess that speedtest.net is streaming data and counting arriving packets, so it measures the actual WiFi speed. My download test involved opening the file in the browser, which requires lots of memory and some processing. Perhaps processing data in the browser takes a lot of time, hence the difference.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] Blairware:
What about distance from the router?

What distances were these done at. What about varying the distance?

The Prime is known to have the Achilles heel of quickly dropping off throughput when you distance yourself from the router. I would be curious a) What distance these tests were done at, and b) to see what they are like at even further (or perhaps closer as well) distances.

No doubt about it though; the numbers you are getting from your Prime are not too swift. Question. Are you affected by any usability issues, such as buffering etc., when streaming video? How is overall performance?
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] Felisek:
Both devices were sitting on the desk next to each other. The distance to the nearest router is about 3 meters. The router is on the ceiling with nothing in the line of site.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] Felisek:
I don't have any particular usability issues. The tablet feels positively quick and responsive when using the interface, playing games and so on. However, web browsing is rather sluggish in compare with the Dell. Web pages that open almost instantaneously on the Dell can take quite a few seconds on the Prime. On the other hand, I can stream video clips, for example from BBC news, with no problems.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] barryflanagan:
What kind of ping times to the router from each of the devices?
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] Felisek:
Good question. I get about 2 ms on the Dell and about 8 ms from the Prime, to the local server. But these results are quite variable and I haven't done proper statistical processing.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] e.mote:
You should specify the WNIC in laptop, rather than the laptop itself.

You're testing for the optimal case (close-range, no obstruction). A test of 10+ meters, ie one or two rooms away, with some obstructions, would be more representative. Rather than finding that the laptop performs better than the Prime, which is pretty much a given, it would be more informative to see how the Prime does with respect to distance & obstruction.

Since speed bottleneck typically involves video content (streaming) or large file transfer, it would be more accurate to larger non-compressible files for transfer, or streaming. A good test would be to stream 1080p, and gradually stretching the distance until drop-offs are noticed.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] Felisek:
I'm not sure. Device manager says "Intel WiFi Link 5100 AGN".

I'm not sure how to measure streaming speed (apart from spotting drop-offs, but that's subjective). I picked a simple method to measure file transfer speed on both machines under optimal conditions.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] e.mote:
The 5100 is an older draft-N dual-band unit with a 1x2 (1 xmit, 2 rcv) arrangement, supposedly capable of 300Mb/s. Most laptop wifi are 1x2 or 2x2, with a few 3x3. In constrast, most mobiles are 1x1, with smaller antennas. So it's a given that laptops will have better wifi reception. You don't need to test for that. Test for something you don't already know about.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] Felisek:
I don't know what "1 xmit, 2rcv" is and how it affects transfer speed. If by "reception" you mean received signal strength, this is not an issue as I am sitting very close to the router and have a very strong signal both on the Prime and the laptop. And yet the tablet is much slower in file transfers.

Are you suggesting this is due to less capable WiFi component (antenna, adapter, whatever it is)?
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] e.mote:
1x2 = one antenna is used to transmit, and two to receive; it means max 150 Mb/s uplink and 300 Mb/s downlink (downlink speed matters more, as you'd expect). These are theoretical speeds, and real throughput is substantially less.

Antennas in mobile devices are smaller and less robust than those in laptops, and there usually is only one for wifi (hence 1x1), whereas in laptops you have two ants. Mobile devices also use SDIO interface that reportedly limits speed to 30-40 Mb/s.

I'm saying that wifi in mobile devices (phones, tablets) is inherently limited, and can't be expected to perform on par with laptops. Comparison against other mobiles, or against itself with varying distance, would be more fruitful.

In any case, it's an academic exercise, since you can't change out for a different antenna or wifi module. There was talk of the Prime being able to run Ethernet USB adapters, and I had asked for some to try out wifi USB adapters, but none responded. I take that to mean USB wifi isn't currently operable w/o a custom kernel.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] aznmode:
I recently had 2 primes. They both showed equal signal strenght with wifi analyzer but speedtest.net shows 1 getting half the speed as the other. I returned that one even though it had a 90% working gps (was still off by 30+ ft and didnt track me well during turn by turn).

For sure its hardware (maybe pogo pins not making good contact or bad PCB) since I updated both to ICS .14 and it didn't affect speedtest results.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] Manngo:
I have no server, but performed a very similar test.

I used WiFi File explorer PRO to transfer a large file from my computer. To do this I connected my laptop to the router with cable. I placed the Prime close to the router, something like half a meter. Result:

File size 726581248 bytes, time 298 seconds.

If I calculate well this means 19000 kbps or 2.325 MB/s. Not bad...
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] chogardjr:
I was testing this exact method two nights ago. I'll do it again and post the results. I'll have three devices... evo4g, evo3d and my prime at a distance of about 30 feet. I'll even throw in laptop speed just for fun.

Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Xparent Blue Tapatalk
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] Jgrimoldy:
I realize that you wanted to test your wireless speed, not your internet connection speed. The results you got on the Prime translate to roughly 4-5 Mbps.

Do you have a fast intenet connection (Cable Modem) that's capable of, say, 10+ Mbps?

What kind of speeds do you see on the Prime at speedtest.net? Assuming that your internet connection is not a bottleneck, I'd expect that you'll see something similar to your simple wireless tests. I'm particularly curious if you see significantly higher speeds at Speedtest. This wouldn't jive well with your wireless tests.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] Manngo:
My speedtest.net results tops around 11000 kbps after running it several times. Unfortunately only in the same room with the router. This is OK since this is the maximum of my net.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] chogardjr:
ok here are my tests. I will start with my Asus G73jh laptop..

My Evo3D

My Evo4G

TFP C20KAS

Here is TFP right at the router, about 1.5 feet away

Like I said before, this is 30 feet away through a wall and a LCD tv. I have no problems with WiFi. I think I have a newer model, not sure.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] buxtahuda:
Well, I suppose it's more or less still messing with the kernel... But WiFi adapters have been made to work with the Prime.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1484339