yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] hara74:
I guess it´s a little snappier than CF-Root

and if u wake up phone from deep sleep, it wakes up more quickly

also charging via USB is quicker
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] uva2212:
Maxicet doesn't seem to encourage trying Franco at this moment..hopefully when it is worked upon then maybe people on tmt can benefit from this super kernel.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] wikzs:
Liking the kernel so far. Just giving some feedback. :)

- Tested R1 and liked it. working fine except for the CWM.

- However, after I flashed R2, I could no longer connect to wifi.

So going back to R1 for the meantime. Using stock ICS ROM btw.

Cheers
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] dickyctk:
Yes, I feel R2 is slower than CF-root. It's obvious when using dolphin browser to zoom in and out quickly...

but the SD CARD IO is faster...
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] aalupatti:
i dont see much difference in performance.. but v10 for Gb roms was a stellar..

I am sure franco is working on it and will make it work great.. just give the man some time...

( there is a reason why he has close to 9000 thanks)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] franciscofranco:
Slower? Elaborate.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] frankcilo:
Hi franco, I continue to have random reboot. I have test that when I launch cpustats app, my Note reboot.

What can be ?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] dickyctk:
I mean the touch responsiveness of user interface under Rocket ROM with Franco R2. For a testing, I try to use two fingers to zoom in/out quickly in dolphin browser, the screen cannot follow my fingers sometimes.

Rocket ROM with CF-Root does the job better..

Kindly correct me if it's not related to Kernal. :)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] xelir13:
Is this kernel compatible with kingdroid ics v1.6?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Crash:
Yes im running right now ;)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] mrmrmrmr:
I read that the kernel doesn't have cifs and tun modules included.

is that correct ?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] franciscofranco:
Tun is enabled by default, CIFS not, and it won't happen. CIFS is a no go in all my kernels, it has serious flaws that can compromise the device.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Starwalker:
Thanks a lot for your work.

Tested r2 with KingDroid 1.6 and the responsiveness of the screen is much better and also the overall performance seems to be increased.

Waiting for r3 :).

Thanks and best regards

Lars
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] turilo:
Damn what rom u currently on?? Nice score!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] turilo:
Your using it on kindroid 1.6? Thought franco kernel was lpy only rom isn't kingdroid ics rom lpf?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] frankcilo:
Francisco, when I want disable wifi...my Note reboot!

Whene I launch cpustats appena, my Note reboot.

When I insert battery charger, display brightness go to max intensity.

...something is wrong!

Please,reply me.

Thanks
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] franciscofranco:
I can't reproduce that. My note is always with wifi enabled, and I've enabled/disabled to test and I don't have that issue. I can open that app as well with 0 problems.

r3

* Removed MMC_CAP_ERASE - workaround to fix the superbrick bug - thanks Entropy512 for all the research and shared knowledge with us for this god damn bug

* Re-activated dynamic hotplug - the system seems to run smoother with this option and according to Entropy it gives us lower idle drain specially while the system is holding a wakelock
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] turilo:
Damn that was quick was about to flash r2 hahaha nice work franco u da bestest :D
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] wildestpixel:
Flashed r3! And posting from it! This is like GB Nexus S RESPONSIVE!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] kzakaria:
King Droid 1.6
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] frankcilo:
:confused:

Ok,thanks!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] n3tcod3:
Any1 test it with CM9/AOSP?

Gesendet von meinem GT-N7000 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] wildestpixel:
Who's had beer or two and fancies a wipe or nandroid restore?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] xelir13:
Using r3 on kingdroid v1.6. Response is awesome
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] cgjones:
So, after flashing r3 does it mean that a Full Wipe is no longer a risk?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] nandihno:
OK it might be a silly question but after flashing this kernel I can't get my wifi to connect it just says obtaining ip address authenticating then back to obtaining ip address

I try to restart but no go
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] matius44:
Dayum! 3 releases in less than 20 hours! That must be a first! :D

Great job franco, will be testing with PA in the coming days
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] chasmodo:
I've had more than that, but still don't fancy doing it.;)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] frankcilo:
Ok Francisco...issue with wifi and random reboot is due to incompatibility with tegrak overclock:rolleyes:

I have installed new r3 and I see other governor. Can you explain their characteristics, because I've never heard before?

Thanks
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Vidati:
quick Q, im on RR V2, can jest flash the kernal with CWM? or its only for the stock LPY/LPF?

thanks ;)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] ziko:
Flashed V2 today and the same overheating issue happened to my Note. The part above battery went very hot and every 2-3 minutes battery drained for 1%.

Installed Kingdroids ROM over Rocket V22, flashed francos kernel and

after rebooting twice and uninstaling SetCPU app described issue is gone. After following this thread from the beginning, no one reportet this issue.

I am on Kingdroids ROM now and the battery drain is better but still to high.

Will installing again SetCPU increase battery life?

With this kernel is my favorite game smoother than ever and want to use this kernel in future but with better battery life
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] nobnut:
Your issue is userland based. Not ROM or kernel based.

Check your apps.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] chensayno:
Thank you, Franco. Wating for your works.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] franciscofranco:
Thanks for bringing that up, I always enjoy some technical and constructive discussions. Let's see if I can give you a proper answer.

Like you said, conventional wisdom tells us that shutting down one core while under a very low load is better for battery. Well, I beg to differ. Two weeks ago I started to code a dynamic hotplug for one of my governors for my Galaxy Nexus kernel, and while the idea was pretty good on paper I soon started to realize that while the system was up (e.g screen on) the amount of processing power involved in the hotplugging process was immense. Note that I was using a very battery oriented governor with a 98% threshold that it stayed on minimum frequency for roughly ~95% of the time. What I realized is that a single operation, like clicking the "Settings" icon, would ramp my load up to 100%, thus onlining cpu1, then ramping down to for example 20% and shutting down cpu1 again. This happened like 10 times in a single second. For the system performance/battery how in hell is this viable and efficient? Plus we can also account for the latency involved with the hotplug action and all the context changes involved when cpu1 was being taken offline and then back online. Do we really want this? No.

This also hurts race-to-idle. Shutting down the screen with a single core at 200mhz would take an insanely higher time to enter idle compared to shutting down the screen being a dual core, and we WANT to enter idle as FAST as possible, for battery and stability.

I hope explained it good enough =)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] schaggo:
Francisco? Franco...? Whatever :p

Well I agree with the overhead swallowing alot of the additional power released by activating CPU1, but, and this is my question: idleing with both cores active when, lets say reading a wikipedia article or staring at an email, no scrolling, no interaction, just static display content, do 2 cores even though idleing (but not deep sleeping!) not suck considerably more battery than 1 idleing core?

Edit: this question focusses on an idleing system with no/minimal CPU activity with the question solely being: 1 vs 2 cores idleing. I do get the idea of race-to-idle and it does make perfectly sense to me as well as the overhead produced by managing two cores eating alot of the power. No discussion here :p
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] franciscofranco:
Let's get this straight: idle is when the device is power collapsed. Power collapsed = when the system is screened down and both cores are idle and NOT being used. It's the deepest power management level of a device, and thats what we want every damn time the screen is off!

The amount of energy used being a dual core at 200mhz and being a single core 200mhz when reading a wikipedia text will be the same, if not better being a dual-core, because when offlining/onlining happens it will **** everything up instead of helping. That is my experience. I don't have ACTUAL numbers to back me off since I would need an ammeter etc, but this is what I could test and measure.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] matius44:
Just had another SoD, I had one like 5 hours before..

Still loving the smoothness of this kernel :D

Q: How can I make a /proc/last_kmsg/ so I can make one when/if it happens again?

Thanks in advance

Sent from my GT-N7000
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] schaggo:
Yes, there seems to be some confusion going around that topic. I did in fact not refer to this state, but to screen on but no load whatsoever on the cpu. When reading ebooks, wikipedia or whatever, the user just staring at the lid up screen for minutes without any system interaction.

This in fact is interesting. Since @200MHz energy is consumed as the system is not deep sleeping/standbying/idleing but is actually on. I figured, two cores not doing anything use more energy than one core not doing anything.

It's ok with the numbers, dont need them. The theory does make sense and I'm testing it out myself :p I'm just stagered that having "more parts" of the system constantly running is actually more power efficient than turning parts of the system off. Modern world problems, I wish back the times shoes were made of wood and communication was face to face or fist to face, depending on the situation :D

Btw: no SOD so far. As I said, stock LA4, manually debloated, was running on FM 2.0 before. Very smooth experience so far.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Lazy Rich:
Battery is pretty good, I got 3 hours of screen time now and 45% battery left. Total uptime 14 hours now, so it will bring me easily over a complete working day where I never have more than 2 hours of screen time.

Great work Francisco, keep on like this :)

Sent from my GT-N7000 Galaxy Note
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] franciscofranco:
Please, don't generalize or less knowledgeable users will get confounded. We're talking about CPU cores only. As long as hotplugging is still an unstable operation I'm pretty sure it will just do more harm than good when disabling cores on runtime. As a very wise guy told me, during screen on if the cpu is not being actively used cores will be put into HALT, so thats all we can get on battery savings during screen on (cpu wise ofc). I'll say this again, this is by no means the absolute truth, just my experience on this matter.

Yes indeed, I got 1 day and 7 hours straight with max brightness and 4 hours screen on and I was at 24% left before I plugged it in...amazing.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] DJChriZZ:
Over 10hours now with your kernel and my bat. Is on 65%.

The note flys. .. I made some tests today vs the new iphone 4s from my mom so my device has a good usage today.

Great work.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Chillz88:
Omg... Love this kernel.. I m using sslauncher with heavy ui customizations... A little unsmoothness when scrolling can be felt.. But apps and games open fast and are smooth.... No heating issues at alll... And f*****g amazing battery.... Brightness at 50 percent only lost about 11 percent with one hour completely full time screen on browsing a little and checking my mail and scrolling my screens a little.. On checking cpu spy, it goes to sleep in 5-7secs with data on...

Thanx a lot for the kernel... Loving it... Using it on rocket v22...:)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] DJChriZZ:
Is there a trick with google maps? It stutters heavy most times.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Calcu:
With rocket v22 and kernel v2 i've overheatings issues.

What logs do you need or... Can i do something to show you anything?

I want to help some way.

Using antutu on conservative mode. 200-1400

Enviado desde mi Note usando Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] betoNL:
Bump...

Any chance with that Tegrak request?

2 whole days on this kernel, no issues at all( well ...only that thing with Tegrak overclock) and for the rest very smooth and energy efficient...

The rom is CriskeloNOTE v6
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] iceangel1980:
as far as I read there is gonna be some custom app for this kernel
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] KaranKapoor:
Switched over from Abyss 3.7 -- is it just me or the S-Pen sensitivity is a 'lil better on this kernel? Is that even possible or am I imagining stuff?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Reynaldinho111:
Loving v2 but my phone was running too hot for my liking. Now trying out abyss but looking forward to see how this kernel matures

Sent from my GT-N7000
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] ys222:
over night - battery usage

3% after 7 Hours :eek:

welcome to the world of efficiancy :p​
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] vegetables:
+1 .. any answer ?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] franciscofranco:
They come in the stock kernel, but disabled. I only enabled them. I still dont know much about them, too soon to say.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Elmar1801:
R3 runs very good. No problems at all.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] cgjones:
Flashed onto RR v2......works great. The ROM was already fast, it's even faster now.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] nandihno:
I came from stock LPF but now no wifi flashed your r3
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] mFlorin:
Can I install this kernel with a ROM (like KingDroid or TMT) by replacing zImage from the ROM .zip and flashing the ROM (with r3 zImage) .zip from GB cwm recovery!?

Is it safe this way?

I'm on GB and NEVER flashed any ICS rom/kernel until now.

If this kernel is safe, I can start trying ROMs to see what I like the most, and I want to replace the zImage from the ROM's .zip with this one.

Steps:

Replace zImage of ALL ICS roms I want to test with the r3 of franco's.

I'm on GB CF LC1 kernel. Wipe data and cache.

Flash .zip.

Test... If I dont like boot to recovery.

WIPE DATA / CACHE / DALVIK

Flash another ROM

IS IT SAFE THIS WAY!?

If so, then WELCOME to a new world :D
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] moresco.dt:
installed r3 on a stock-rooted (of course) LPY but i've lost wifi :(
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] nandihno:
Good am not the only one me on LPF
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] thering1975:
Franco

Superb running v3 on Cassie xlr ics lpy and all the lag and issues when running cf are gone. Smooth as excellent work.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] clarkk:
I just tried it with ParanoidAndroid and it didnt like it :( It boots but lots of FC's when it fires up. I backed up mmcblk0p5 before so just wrote it back again.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] franciscofranco:
Wi fi is the first thing I test in every kernel, I guarantee it works and I tested it quite extensively. Are you running Tegrak something app? Heard someone before in the thread that said it was causing him wifi derp.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] chasmodo:
So good to hear a voice from the transgender community.:p
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] monkeydrufy:
Sorry guys,

How Can I install it on kingdroid?

thanks
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Crash:
Via CWM ;)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] n3tcod3:
Thx for answer. Then ill wait for a kernel that works with cm9, etc.

Gesendet von meinem GT-N7000 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] thering1975:
Wifi perfect inc 5g
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] adv1sory:
Im having the same issue with wifi on lpf. Obtaining ip then nothing. Only thing im running is set cpu
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Crash:
I run set cpu too no wifi problems at all :D
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] killerjohn:
me too
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] monkeydrufy:
thanks, are you feeling a different battery life?

thanks
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] dickyctk:
franco, what you did in R3. The touch response is much better than R2...

It's really better than CF-Root now...
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Crash:
Way better and if you charge via usb charge faster than the stock kernel ;)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] adv1sory:
Weird.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] nandihno:
I came from stock LPF had to get cwm. Zip install but besides that everything else works just that wifi is a must for me
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] aalupatti:
Repeating my previous question: Is it safe to use this kernel with CM9 ?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] nandihno:
If it helps my wifi use to connect on 2.4 ghz on 5 I can't see it

So definitely an issue
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] anonymous572:
Flashed it to my ROM (you can see it at signature). I'm really shocked now... It's boot about 1,5-2 times faster and works so quick... I feel like I have a new device with quad core processor or something! No more wake lag. I really cannot believe that this is my Galaxy Note... It's waking right after I press center button or power button!! I was just overwhelmed by emotions. I did not expect such a result!!!! Many thanks franco! You did a very great job.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] n3tcod3:
One user wrote that he has tested the kernel on ParanoidAndroid and he had many fc's. So I do not think so.

Gesendet von meinem GT-N7000 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] tw15tr:
This kernel is amazing. My note is alot faster now.

Love you're work :)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] gominolo2002:
Hi!

With this R3, the ICS brick it´s fixed?????? Why in XDA the devs make the work that Samsung not be make???

Congratulations devs!!!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] bigmouth66:
Is your router on channel 13? With LPF some people had wifi problems when on channel 13. When they changed it to another channel, for example 6, wifi problems were gone. Hope this helps :)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] M3TALLICA:
Alright guys.

I'm going to perform nandroid back up then wipe data twice in the recovery stay tuned.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] FreakingNeo:
Franco, you're the best! Thanks again for the ICS Kernel.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] bigmouth66:
WoW! Rocket ROM 2 really flies with this kernel! :D Ultrafast and buttersmooth! Thanks Franco, great work! :)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] tw15tr:
I'm on channel 1, but can't connect to my wifi :(
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] nandihno:
I was on stock LPF before and wifi worked and yes am on channel 6

It detects wifi but it doesn't connect

Wondering is there any way to get back to stock kernel?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] hklam0:
I have similar issue but I tried when I assign IP instead of DHCP, the wifi connects, I wonder why. I had this issue with CF-Root Kernel, Franco Kernel 3.0.15 v2 and v3, but fine with v1.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] FiremakerP:
On the r3 kernel right now. Very responsive indeed! Will be staying with it thanks for the quick fix!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] M3TALLICA:
Just performed data wipe/factory reset twice.

Phone is booting up.

No more superbrick.

(That was my 22nd factory reset on official ICS)

----

Edit

----

Now flashing stock GB rom with PC odin, just to recheck.

Successfully flashed GB with PC Odin!

I can say that r3 does not have Superbrick bug, but we still need more people to confirm.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] buffylig:
KingDroid 1.6 and this kernel on Quadrant: not bad, not bad ;-D
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] anandpo:
See the deep sleep pattern. If the system is always awake it will obviously respond faster but the battery also drain faster.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] tw15tr:
I got similar results (4657) on LPF and this kernel :)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] alexant:
Are you planning to make it be possible to use with paranoidandroit ?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Ensifolk:
Indeed, awaiting more people to confirm. But you seem to have it right ! :) I hope it's gone !
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] jonpaslim:
Can I flash the r3 franco kernel by using the mobile odin? Is this r3 are for lpf and lpy only? Your reply much appreciated,thanks.:D
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] franciscofranco:
Should work on both variants.

OK finally got some free time after all the fixings, I'm gonna work on the app update.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] jonpaslim:
Thanks franco for your answer but the first question I make a z image of r3 can I flash it in mobileodin, is it okay? Thanks for your hard work in making my note more interesting and safe also.:D
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] braso:
Yes. If you can flash other kernels using MO why would this one be any different? :o
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] LordManhattan:
WAIT.

I'm drunk and it's a 3.x kernel so i tried it on ParanoidAndroid, and i does indeed.. fail. I'm not able to boot, but thanks to the Samsung god i'm able to enter Download mode. Do NOT flash if you're on Paranoid.

That is all. You're welcome world.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] silverstream:
On both R1 & R3, I'm experiencing non sensitive screen after wake. am using swipe unlock, but i can swipe the screen as.its non sensitive
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] braso:
Franco has been quite upfront about not supporting CM9 and other AOSP ROM variants. If you aren't on a Samsung based ICS ROM, don't try it.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] LordManhattan:
YES! I did it! I managed to get into CWR! Flashing back to a GB backup now and going back to the sweet Paranoid.

---------- Post added at 12:53 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:49 AM ----------

Yeah no **** :p I'm not blaming Franco at all. This is my fault (Cough, alcohol), but no worries, it's all good. My Note is a strong son of a B, and it won't give up that easily. Restoring now, and we'll see if it dies or not. Pray for my boy.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] musashiro:
Crazy idea:

kernel devs should share codes about this emmc sh*tness to provide more safe kernels... how about that?? :)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] sangalaviral:
Franco can you tell if the stock roms other than LPF/LPY are supported or not??

R3 still give me the same result. Stuck on note logo.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] aalupatti:
For the sake of testing I installed in CM9 and yes tons of force closure

yes. I know that . But love this kernel so much that i wanted to test it in CM.

I guess I do have the right to keep wishing that it might work one day ;)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] LordManhattan:
Update: It's ALIVE!

I should go to bed now before i try to flash XP on my HTC Touch.