yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] newg:
I'm on the test build, have been since it was posted. The sods I experienced are gone. However, I just had a random reboot for no discernable reason. I was reading in aldiko, and the phone just rebooted. Any ideas?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] krazman325:
I have had several random reboots on the test kernel, too. Also hard to wake sometimes when screen is off. Didn't have them at all on v6 or v9. Been on test since it was posted and problems have occured occasionally since.

Haven't had either in the 24 hrs since I re-installed Tegrak OC. Though I doubt installing Tegrak has anything to do with these problems stopping for now.

kraz
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] indiandroid:
May be he is a Chef with a Galaxy Note :eek:

:D:D:D
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] lrcquest:
Is your note recently purchased?

Did you apply the jbroid kernel cleaning script prior to flashing the test build?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] thoriig:
What rev do u have?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] frankcilo:
I'm testing this kernel (beta) and it's fine. Will be added more governor over the ondemand? I also noticed in all the kernel (and thus do not know if it can depend on the kernel or the Rom), pictures and videos recorded in low light, you will see all grainy on the Note (but not on Pc or other smartphone, as if it were too high contrast. And in fact, using the app "Screen Adjust", and reducing the contrast, they see well, but black is too clear. It will be possible to improve this defect?

Thanks
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] :
Purchased exactly a week ago :)

and no, I didn't. I'll try that later on ^^
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] xos84292:
test ver , no crashes or pixelated screens~ (test on LC1 ROM.)

I'm so happy I can use your core,fast and power saving!

A question, It 's based for LC1?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] VTEChump:
Seeing some ok battery life...:)

Screenshots are using test kernel with Kingdroid rom v7. Astounding!!!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] gaddy888:
Vtechump, 5 hours screen on time is incredible. Is that with wifi AND 3g on?

Are you using push mail?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] duowing:
I'm not sure if it's the kernel or related to the fact that I updated from LB1 to LC1 but with the test kernel I've been noticing I get the issue where my screen doesn't want to wake up right away and it'll be possibly anywhere from 15-30 seconds until the screen comes on again. I encountered a similar problem on a phone call where I had to keep entering numbers through the dialer for various menus. It was working fine then all of a sudden the screen failed to come on for a bit and finally when it did I was in a call at the lock screen.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] frankcilo:
Use you a screen off profile?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] kopitalk:
I had similar problem, i.e. the screen was taking quite some time to turn on after a call. Encountered this few times with franco kernels even before the new source release. Another problem I noticed that when in the morning (after Note in long deep sleep), the clock widget was not showing real time. I had to delete the widget and add clock widget again (I'm using Go Launcher btw).

Nevertheless, really fast and smooth kernel :)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Diamantes:
Yes, indeed. Me too.

But it is random and I can live with it... :p
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] theory_87:
Did u use tegrak to do any tweak? When I stop using it, the crash stop

Sent from my GT-N7000
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] gaddy888:
Am I the only one who feels the kernel doesn't allow deep sleep as much as some other kernels like abyssnote?

On abyss with everything on, I'd get 80% plus deep sleep.

Over-night, when the phone is not in use, I'd get close to 90%.

I only just installed the new sources test kernel. Some people suggested that it takes a while for the kernel to settle in. How long should one wait?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Rigby2011:
Reboot a few times, that works.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] VTEChump:
Yes, push mail (at least 50 emails per day), wifi always on and connected about 90% of the time. I also underclock to 1.2ghz (no noticeable difference in performance) and am using an Anker 2500ma (stock) battery. I haven't seen anywhere near this kind of battery life from any combination of ROM/kernel. This combo gets the phone into deep sleep fast and consistently.

---------- Post added at 08:35 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:32 AM ----------

Take a look at my screenshots above. I am seeing a total of 6h23m awake time with 5h18m of screen on time. This is an incredible ratio (considering push email), and shows the phone gets into deep sleep very quickly (using "test" kernel).
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] krazman325:
I think my problem was using SetCPU profiles with Tegrak OC 1600. When I disabled SetCPU profiles, the random reboots stopped. I haven't had a single delay in screen on since running Tegrak OC. I don't know enough about voltage settings or underclocking to make any other tweaks. I only set cpu at 1600.

I've searched for other posts with their Tegrak settings, but I can't find any from Note users on franco.kernel. I don't want to hijack this thread. It would be nice to start a thread in Q&A with posts from Tegrak users with their settings. See this: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=24101599#post24101599

kraz
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] sotmax:
feedback.

franco 2 of 3 lb1 notes experience wake up problems once per day or two.

Can you give a look when you can?

Thanks
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] thoriig:
Use jbroid cleaning script. Could be a problem with older tweaks.

On rc the note just stay 200mhz, no deep sleep. That is a normal behavior.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] sotmax:
done it at one of them already but experience the same.

In another i ve made a full wipe and see.

May be it s another reason and not the kernel.

We ll see.

Thanks anyway
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Steelduines:
I'm currently on franco #9 and I want to try out the test build. Just to be sure.. Can I flash JBroid in CWM and the the test kernel with CWM or should I do this both with Recovery?

Normally I flash my kernel using the kitchen in CheckROM, so I'm a kernel flash n00b
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] eliashadow:
Flash both in recovery.Its better.

First JBroid and then Franco's kernel without rebooting between...;)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] gaddy888:
Thanks I'll try that and set it overnight.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] jon3sh:
Wherr is the link for the test build is 9 the same as test build? Cant find the link for test build in OP Thanks

..
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] kzakaria:
Post # 1691
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] GwynBleidd:
How about this :-) (Screens are in Russian but it should be understandable). Basically 2 days 11 hours, with 7:27:24 screen on and 1:31:05 voice calls.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] VTEChump:
That is great!! Tell me about how you get these numbers?? Assume you must be using 2g instead of 3g network?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] sotmax:
seems that full wipe working.

So this is the second including mine with full wipe and clean install.

Kernel seems fine.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] nagato86:
Hello everyone ... where can I find previous versions of this kernel?! I found the link in a post but do not work anymore!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] LemonPowerForce:
First SOD on test kernel today. came from #9, used jbroid when switching.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] notegalaxy:
Do you have setcpu and tegrak oc installed? I foynd setcpu caused sod issues. Havent had a sod since i uninstalled it and ran tegrak instead. Although i have had a few slow wakeups where it takes 10-20 seconds to respond and show lock screen but that seems to be a common fault
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] eliashadow:
Last Chrack rom + Test v.9 Franco's kernel + Setcpu underclock (1200 max speed).

Not sod for 2 days now, not pixel salad or any salad, smooth, fast (first time im satisfite with Franco's kernels).

Nice job..;)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] LemonPowerForce:
nope. have never used either.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] GwynBleidd:
Yes you're right... 2g, no autosync, no push, turning on connections only when I need them (except for voice), some undervolting, smartassv2 200-1400, but probably the most important in battery saving is the fact that the screen is too bright for me at night even on minimum and I'm using Screen Filter when reading/browsing in the dark.

Whatever we invent with cpu, connections, syncs, etc - screen is still the main energy drainer (no wonder).
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] coolfire:
Awesome stuff, Franco! Finally, no more pixel-salad... lol

Sent from my SGN
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] mccmjoon76:
Em... bad news i got 3 times Deep sleep in 1 week using the test version kernel :(

Back to v6 ...

My build base on GB LC1 ..
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] sotmax:
try a full wipe...that makes it working...by meaning full include emmc..this is the only solution for now.

Test it at 3 devices so far and working.

My sequence was:

wipe dalvik c, cache part, emmc,system,data,boot, factory settings,install rom,wipe dalvik& cache,install kernel wipe dalvik & cache,set permissions, done.

For now after many tests that way is the better and makes the device faster ar least for that device and that kernel.

Many will complain about full wipe but this is the way it was and thats the way that it will be for stability...;)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] markuz85:
I actually just fixed permissions in cwm and haven't had deep sleep issues since (3 days).

Edit: oh yeah, and I wiped dalvik as well.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] bfikkert:
Nice numbers.

How did you set smartassv2. Setcpu is only showing ondemand and prefomance with the test kernel?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] gaddy888:
Just thought I'd let you all know that reinstalling, re-wiping cache and dalvik cache seems to have helped. (as always, panacea for all ills..)

Got about 84% deep sleep overnight, which is about as much as the other kernels I've tried. This one is super smooth though.

Thanks
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] jon3sh:
+1 Anytime you are flashing any file its a good habit to wipe cache and dalvik I always do too. :)

..
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] cswithxda:
###Removed some chaotic worthless crap that I had no idea why I posted after only reading to page 150###

EDIT: NICE PERFORMANCE BUMP!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] bkeaver:
I don't know how anyone can ask where the test version is cause it tells the location of it in the title of this thread :)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] cswithxda:
LOL Silly Me :p

Repeat: Post #1691

Thank you!

---------- Post added at 09:11 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:27 PM ----------

It says "The user hosting this content is out of bandwidth." :(

Any mirror? Appreciate it if someone can upload here :)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] mccmjoon76:
Yep.. before apply the test kernel, I started my build from scratch so is full wipe .

But test kernel surely is smoothness than v6 version.

Thanks for the tips man... :)

Send from my MixTheme Galaxy Note using xda premium
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] cswithxda:
Alright, i may have made a mistake couple posts above: I didn't read enough and used v.9 and criticize at the wakeup salad issue. So I made it up by reading all the way from post #1691 till this last post. Despite the fact that I sorted out many frequent issues people encountered and (most if not all) solutions to them, I did not find anyone mentioning the link that Franco provided is no more. It says "The user hosting this content is out of bandwidth." Looks like this kernel is too popular to be put on a host that has data cap policy. And also looks like it just died within the past 2 to 3 days.

Could anyone please upload the kernel zip here for me and other unfortunate new-comers to try it out? I'm so tempted to try this highly appraised testing version. (Pray that my nandroid backup will work)

Thanks in advance!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] duowing:
One other interesting thing that I've found when using the test kernel vs the cf-root kernel is that for some reason with francos it seems to be slightly less responsive when it comes to rather fast swiping on the screen. I've been hooked on fruit ninja lately and I've noticed that really fast swipes were not being detected or partially detected. Finally I switched back to cf-kernel as I wss kind of annoyed with the long sleep time/wakeup issue that I encounter every so often. I started playing fruit ninja and I noticed I could swipe really fast with no issues just like on my nexus. I'm usig Germany Open LC1 with LC1 cf-root kernel and LA4 baseband.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] chasmodo:
Here ya go.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] ph00ny:
um. that's just an inflated IO score. Not really a huge bump
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] cswithxda:
Thanks a lot sir!

OK? Let's not poop the party, I'm sure there are other people like me and we are celebrating this 1000k quadrant score increase not realizing it's "merely" an inflated IO score. Even worse, we don't even care what IO score means!

lol j/k. I'm just messing around here.

I did notice the gain was majorly due to the increased I/O. Do you mind kindly briefly explaining what that means and what that'll bring?

Thanks
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] skerk:
Increased I/O should really be a good thing.

The easy way of explaining it is that it's the same kind of difference you'llk notice when going from HDD to SSD on a pc. What i don't know is the difference in bytes/sec that 1000 quadrant scores compares to.

But still it's a measure on how good your disk is on shuffling data to the RAM/CPU.

It should probably mean that your apps starts faster and data intensive apps would feel snappier.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] l0rd_almighty:
Had to uninstall the test build. The issues with the screen taking too long to wake up was getting worse. Plus i was getting a lot of FCs on my apps. Reverted back to a stock rooted kernel.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] M3TALLICA:
So far I am having great battery and performance with test build. Only problem is home or power key does not wake up the phone. It's not SOD, I got to press power/home key again n again and it wakes up. May be phone is getting tired, the performance this kernel is delivering.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] TivAk:
Guys use the jbroid kernel cleaning script before flashing the kernel this will solve a lot of problems ;-)

Noted by Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] cswithxda:
ye, the phone is running strong in the past couple of hours. I came up from CF-ROOT LB2 kernel, manually wiped cache and dalvik before and after flashing the new testing kernel. No issue on waking phone or nandroid backup. Guess I finally get lucky once in some time. Battery life is something to be observed in next few days.

---------- Post added at 04:44 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:02 AM ----------

Did anyone actually try this: do a nandroid backup using CWM tool made my ChainFire? I just made a backup using the CWM toolbox (not recovery), so the date and time can be set correctly. Using CWM recovery to execute a backup gives me a nandroid folder with date and time that's actually 5 hours ahead of my local time. Weird.

So I made this backup, but don't know if it's intact and I can use it to restore in the future. So if anyone has actually used a backup file that's made using CWM toolbox to restore, please kindly let me know :)

---------- Post added at 04:58 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:44 AM ----------

I also just discovered this: (this only happens after I flashed Franco Kernel)

Check the details of a nandroid backup folder, even if it was just made a minute ago, in this case, 4:52AM here, the detail says the modified time is 9:52AM, which is 5 hours ahead.

The issue I mentioned above, where the automatic naming of the nandroid folder when making a backup under CWM recovery also follow this pattern--5 hours ahead of actual local time.

This makes me wonder if there is a timing mechanism in the kernel that's separate from the OS. Because if i let the CWM name the backup folder, it give the correct local time in accordance with the OS, whereas when I use CWM recovery, it automatically set the wrong time that has been 5 hours ahead consistently.

I'm a total noob so I can only imagine that there is a separate timing mechanism for kernel that's separate from OS. Anyone with relevant knowledge please chime in to enlighten us.

---------- Post added at 05:07 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:58 AM ----------

And I don't know why this imaginary "Kernel time" is 5 hours ahead of mine, but 5 time zones ahead, it's the Greenwich standard time GTM 0, which also covers part of Portugal, :D, and my imagination lead me to assume that Franco somehow embedded default time zone for the "Kernel time" to be his local time. LOL

There's too much imagination and guesstimate here, so forgive my boldness and noobness in this assumption. And anyone with knowledge please please confirm :)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] mdrjr:
@Franco

no CIFS on Testing kernel?

Do you plan to add it back on #10 ?
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] mohawkx:
Does anybody know if the dongle for HDMI that Amazon sells for the Galaxy 10.1 tab work with the Galaxy 7.0 plus? It plugs into the Samsung port, uses a power cord plug in and terminates in an HDMI for adding a HDMI cable between it and your Monitor. I see nothing for HDMI for the 7.0 plus and the specs say that it doesn't work with the old Galaxy 7.0. Definately need an HDMI adapter to stream videos to my big screen.
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] aeon101:
Yes, it should definitely works. Though don't know what kind of adapter Amazon sells, but original from Samsung works perfectly (all tabs except old 7).
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] mohawkx:
Appreciate the response. Will order one tonight. :)
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] bydo:
Keep in mind that you need to have the AC power adapter plugged in all the time into the HDMI cable or you'll get no signal. Kind of a stupid design that you can't use HDMI without also charging the tab at the same time. Unless someone has found an alternate HDMI cable that doesn't require power?
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] dexterstyles:
Got one the other day. Netflix is a bit wonky but ripped DVDs play great on our 42". Can also plug inta a monitor with hdmi for a great large screen experience.
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] aeon101:
Unfortunately, but that' s no big deal. All samsung tabs works only with power adapter plugged in (Note as well) through HDMI.

---------- Post added at 06:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:38 PM ----------

Hopefully works and you enjoy it..:-)
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] mohawkx:
Just an update. Recieved my HDMI adapter. There were 2 available on Amazon. 1 for 39.95 which touted the fact that it was genuine Samsung and the other one which was 27.95. I ordered the 27.95 one and it was a factory Samsung adapter. Only difference was the price. Followed the instructions to the letter as far as connection sequence and it works perfect. I downloaded the app "World Streaming TV (News)" from the market and I get CNN live, CNN international, Fox News, Real News, Discovery Channel, BBC, MSNBC and a host of others. Basicly all the channels I pay Dish for now.

Immediately canceled my Dish Network and I'm saving 57.00 a month now. This tablet just paid for itself. I'm using a 15 foot HDMI cable I got from amazon for 13.95 and there is no loss of signal with the extended run. I also got the extra long power charging cable for 6.97. No problems there either.

I'm very, very happy.

FYI, The best streaming TV I found was the above mentioned World Streaming TV (News) Edition. When you first get it, you must go into preferences and check the box for onboard browser. The browser that comes with the app just shows a white screen with audio. I have Opera and Dolphin Browser and Dolphin Browser works best with this app. It seems to smooth out the Buffering the more you use it. When I first started watching it would pause quite a bit. After a couple hours that stopped entirely and the stream was smooth as silk. I left it on from 8AM until 10PM to test it and never had a stutter or freeze. It just worked.

Hope this helps any other 7.0 plus owners who were sitting on the fence about streaming to large screen through the Tab Plus.

Just for reference, my Broadband connection runs at 7mb so it's not really that fast by comparison.
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] aeon101:
Thanks for this reference and info, will try it soon.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] blackinjun:
I like my prime, and don't care whether you do or not.

Well do you? or not?

BTW if you want to post a sad or happy story, post away but vote first.

Edit JD made a good point if you cant return it but wish you could vote under the appropriate return slot
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] jdbaker82:
no option for depends if I can get a refund or not cause then I won't have a choice
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] blackinjun:
nope keeping it real simple, just curious about the basics yes, no, maybe, and returning.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] jdbaker82:
some people would return but no longer have the option just saying your missing that from the poll cause that's my vote. I would return for a refund if I could
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] Phoneguy589:
I'll like even more with an unlocked BL :D. First tablet I've ever owned and am completely satisfied. The 1 thing I wish it had was a USB port but I'm happy.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] demandarin:
Majority speaks so far. Just like in other polls. ;)
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] blackinjun:
Yeah it's interesting, I just wanted something not shaded, I probably shouldn't have even mentioned that I like mine
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] demandarin:
Its fair enough. All I would want is people to vote honestly. N I feel the ones that like the prime always do. That's how all this type polls turn out the same. Majority loves the prime n want to keep it. We know prime has its flaws, for me GPS. But when you get a good working one, like me..lol, its too hard to deny that this is a great device. Just glad I don't have to deal with issues to take away from my enjoyment of it. Its like the prime stays glued to my hands now..lol my ipad just sits n collect dust now if my girl not using it..lol
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] RonH54:
I voted "Not decided". I have only had for a few hours and I Love everything about this Tablet except for the Wifi weakness and that might not be a deal breaker. The reason I got a Tablet was for my wife to take to meetings where she needs Wifi access for Webpages and the ability for her to transfer Documents and Data she has on our PC to the Tablet and vice versa. We had a 7 year old Laptop she had been using and it was time for an update anyhow and she loves the size and weight of a tablet. The Prime is PERFECT for her if she can get good WiFi at Conference meetings in Convention Centers and Hotels. She really doesn't have a meeting until April where she needs the Tablet so I am going to have to try to test the Wifi in some areas before hand since I have the 14 days I can return to Best Buy.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] blackinjun:
How often will you "wife" get to use it?
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] benefit14snake:
Back to dislike. Boo for sleep issue!