yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] skd:
It is very good... I can use Junos Pulse SSL VPN with RDP :) I couldn't before... (except CF kernel)

Thanks Francisco...

PS: Will we have a chance about BLN? :)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] zstef:
Test kernel looks promising... no SoDs or reboots in last 5 hours, even after fully charging the phone. Of course, let's not jump into conclusions just yet, but this certainly looks very good.

Now it'd be great to have some basic overclocking abilities.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] papi77:
No more pixel salad for me too. I am on Chrack v16 rom and everything works like charm. Thank for your great work.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] bkeaver:
I too what certainly like to see what this Kernel can OC'd. it is fast as crap at stock speed as it is..

---------- Post added at 11:08 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:38 AM ----------

This too just happened to me after a call. :confused:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Rigby2011:
Fast as crap? This is faster than abyss at full oc. I do not need oc. Only takes more juice at little gain.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] scourgeofgod:
I dont understand why anyone would want to overclock note.

It has the fastest processor (a dual core) in a market where most game apps are designed for slower phones. If multitasking is what you are after i suggest you get a lite ROM or delete the bloatware in your ROM.

I rather have this kernel tweaked to enable undervolting while retaining the stability of franko kernel. The only weakness of note is its battery - i.e the "screen on" time available after each recharge and if undervolting can push it up by a notch or two it would be great.

---------- Post added at 04:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:46 PM ----------

my thoughts exactly.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Rigby2011:
I whas trying abyss 4.2 and only random reboots at 1704 cpu. Battery heat almost 51 degrees. Could fry a egg on it. No oc kernels for me anymore. When ics comes out 1200 is enough. Whas running chinese ics and it whas fast. So that proofs we do nod need performance to increase by tuning up the cpu.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] maniacscorpio:
in my opinion stock kernel are far better than any mod kernel...........
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] zstef:
Having an option to overclock something doesn't mean that you HAVE to overclock something. Ok?

Simply don't do it if you don't want to.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] GwynBleidd:
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but I'm certain most people won't agree with you here. (That's a polite version of saying bull****).

Custom kernels are highly tuned and tweaked up, optimized, customizable, able to undervolt, underclock, overclock, custom governors, i/o schedulers, compiled using latest tools Samsung engineers probably never heard of, and in general are full of awesomeness.

That's true for any device and almost any custom kernel available (there are ones that suck but it's a minority).

I'd like to see how your stock kernel goes against my setting with carefully chosen undervolting, fine tuned governor and a bunch of tweaks. Compared to stock, I'm getting at least 1.5-1.7x battery life while having a much faster and 100% stable device PLUS a ton of additional stuff like NTFS, CIFS, Voodoo Louder, and much, much more.

You're just missing out on a lot of stuff if you're sticking to stock kernel.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] predator21:
hi bro gr8 kernel... may i request u to integrate red pill touch recovery along with it...coz cwm recovery giving funny errors while bk up....
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] bkeaver:
i never use it daily OC'd there are times I do crank it up briefly but for the most part my phone is usually set at stock speeds.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] franciscofranco:
Ok this is what you'll find or find not on my kernels:

* Overclocking - probably not, theres no need to add that

* Undervolting - less likely than Overclocking. I want this stable and undervolting saves almost nothing in the end

* BLN - not happening at all

* Other recoveries - CWM works fine with no problems for me so I'm not going to change it
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] bkeaver:
good enough for me.. non of that was a requirement.. just a curiosity type of thing.. Thanks!!

On another note have you seen the posts where the screen goes black after a call and doesn't wake up? If you responded to those and I haven't noticed my apologies in advance...
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] albireox:
This is of course your decision, but the first two would be nice to have. First of all, overclocking is always nice, at least on the Note that (somewhat) proved to work with no problems at 1.6GHz. Second, also from the experience, you could lower the voltage at most frequencies (with at least 50mV) with no impact on stability.

Of course, every processor is different, still, at least a "test" version with OC and UV capability, would be nice to have.

Just a thought... :)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] chasmodo:
If it ain't broken, don't fix it. :)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] zstef:
Well, I'm just saying that overclocking of any kind obviously didn't have anything to do with SoDs/reboots/salads so it probably could be added without consequences.

I'm not at all interested in undervolting, overvolting etc. but moderate overclocking should be pretty safe.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Notified:
Hi there

After flashing the "normal" Franco Kernel 9 after installing Darky Rom 3.3 Final I had a very bad battery drain in the first 24 hours (~2,5 full charges gone through in that time), so I wiped the dalvik cache & the cache partition and all was fine :D.

Now I get ~ one day with heavy use (for me) or easily one and a half day otherwise, just great *thumbsup*.

Never had pixel salad and only one SOD a few days ago, and I use this combination for ten days now as a daily driver.

Also a few days ago I had one single overheat (when the dolphin browser was pulled back after writing a SMS). Now I close the browser after using it instead of minimizing it, and I never got another overheat :).

Many thanks Francisco, I REALLY hated the lags of the Note thoroughly the whole GUI, and with your Kernel I'm left with quasi zero lags, just great :).
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] zviki:
What?OC didn't have anything with SoDs & reboots? It's all about for how many Hz you overclock your phone and not all processors the same. Everyone can react differently to the same frequency. I already had this experience with my Motorola .
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] zstef:
What the hell are you talking about? I'm talking about SoDs and reboots which I (and many others) had on any Franco kernel prior to this last test kernel based on new Samsung sources.

I'm not talking about those kind of situations when you overclock/underclock your phone over its limits.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] schaggo:
Could you guys stay on topic? OC is all nice and fun, but Franco pointed out several times already there wont be OC. I suggest you open a separate thread in "General" to continue talk about this. Does that sound ok?

Testing kernel behaving cool. Second day in.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] motumbo:
Why don't you just get Tegrak Overclock from market?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Rigby2011:
Originally Posted by*zstef**Well, I'm just saying that overclocking of any kind obviously didn't have anything to do with SoDs/reboots/salads so it probably could be added without consequences.I'm not at all interested in undervolting, overvolting etc. but moderate overclocking should be pretty safe.

What the hell are you talking about. I had sods and reboots with abyss 4.2 when oc it to 1704 but not when i clocked it to 1400. Seems to me oc whas to blame. And how can you say its not oc that cause sods and reboots? Than you know whats causing it and you can develop a better kernel. See your new thread in a few days with a perfect kernel oc to 1794 and no heat and batt drain.:eek:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] albireox:
Because it's not compatible with Franco's kernel.

---------- Post added at 10:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:28 PM ----------

Well, as far as I could understand Franco didn't say for sure it won't add OC or UV. So, there is still hope.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] krazman325:
Francisco said it's not happening!

If you still don't get it, under his xda signature is a line that says: If you don't like my answer, read this. Tap the "read this", read it, get over it and quit arguing over something you have no control over, then get back to topic or move on!

OR, develope your own kernel however you like.

kraz
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] motumbo:
At least the application I have is working perfectly with this new test version. Give it a try.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] zstef:
Obviously you two have to learn how to read.

I said that I had SoDs & reboots on ANY version of Franco kernel with or without OC. What's more I had it on any Abyss kernel, again with or without OC. Franco's latest test kernel is the first one (besides stock and CF-Root which is basically a stock kernel also) with which I have neither SoDs nor reboots.

And I know Franco tried everything to solve it and nothing worked till he got latest sources from Samsung. That was the reason for my conclusion that slight OC that he had in his kernel wasn't to be blamed here. Cause - it - has - been - solved - by - the - latest - sources - from - Samsung. Obviously if you're going in OC/UV direction you have noone else to blame but yourself if something goes wrong. And something will go wrong if you don't know what you're doing.

But whatever, guys, think what you want. Bottom line, I can now use Franco's kernel without the worry of not being waken up for work in the morning.

So thank you Franco for cracking this nut, you've really shown some perseverance in solving this puzzle. SoDs & reboots are gone and so am I.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] franciscofranco:
Well I had to fix it I use my note a lot more than the Nexus ;)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Vatoe:
My observation is that battery usage is excellent - I have been on the kernel for approximately 12 hours or so. I was extremely happy with this test build until about 5 minutes ago, when I went to wake up the phone, and the screen wouldn't turn on. I waited for approximately a minute where it eventually turned on. All seems well so far, but I might reboot anyway.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] AhmadOkda:
Lucky us :-)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] missxtee:
quick question for testing build should I clean init.d folder of running scripts? (thunderbolt script) or is a cache and dalvik wipe good enough?

Sent From Galaxy Note Baby!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] zviki:
@zstef - at the end people would blame Franco's kernel because of their mistakes.

@Franco - could you include 5815 cwm recovery please in new release? It have bigger fonts and it's touch friendly.And,is cwm app fully supported with your kernel?I read something about integration into kernel and full functionality of app in cfroot(chainfire) post.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Framedtrash:
had a weird issue unsure if its rom related or kernel

im running the test build and have just reverted back to checkrom v5 from v6

all is running well with no pixel salad

but i go to unlock my screen and the screen is upside down and every thing on the screen is flipped

every thing still runs its just u cant see what button you are pressing

have to pull the battery out and reboot

any ideas ??
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Chillz88:
Its because of the crt on animation of jkay... Untick it in deluxe settings and you are done..:)

---------- Post added at 09:25 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:45 AM ----------

Its because of the crt on animation of jkay... Untick it in deluxe settings and you are done..:)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Framedtrash:
Thanks for the reply mate

I had just come to that conclusion as well

It was the other other thing i had changed since i had switched roms
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] audioph1le:
Installed CheckRom V5, flashed your Kernel, everything OK.

Then flashed 5 mods via KitchenPro = Bootloop with Samsung Logo.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Lazy Rich:
Got it running with min. 500 since a few hours, till now everything is okay.

Sent from my GT-N7000 Galaxy Note
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] thering1975:
Blazing mate top work. Deleted supercharger scripts no issues so far
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Guitarfreak26:
Still deep sleeps for me, even with 500mhz min
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] titowsky:
sod also for me with rocket v22 after removing unit. d

but the kernel seemed to be wonderful...

Inviato dal mio GT-N7000 usando Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] cheezusweezel:
This time I did first the kernel cleaning script and then reflashed franco.kernel ! So far no SOD for me ... :cool:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] franciscofranco:
Ok guys thanks for all the info. #2 should roll out in the next hours. What I did notice was this: Conservative 500min 1400max, dynamic hotplug off, 3 hours screen time, max brightness, almost 17hours uptime, 42% left...what sorcery is this?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] garyd9:
Consider locking the processor to 800 MHz on standby. The exynos will freeze if its forced lower than that in the standby. Created lots of sod issues for the i9100 and i777.

Aftr is a good thing.. a sort of semi-standby mode.

Haven't played with your kernel yet, but I'm actually starting to feel comfortable with the Samsung exynos (and samsung's quirks in their kernel modifications)

Take care

Gary
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] motumbo:
I'm running this kernel since this morning. No sleep of death. Not any reboots. So far so good. Running XLA4 Chris X tweaked ROM. Before I was using speed mod kernel.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Khyllion:
Nice to see a new developer for our SGN, and a portuguese developer !!

Sou português mas vivo na Suiça. To continue in english, I will give a try to your kernel when version 2 will be online!

Thanks for your work !
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] franciscofranco:
That's helpful. I think I know where to set it, thanks.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] garyd9:
Sent a github commit link in PM.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] avetny:
F5 f5 f5 f5 f5 f5 f5

:p
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] schaggo:
Unless we are talking different things (Deep Sleep vs. Standby), how come the Note works beautifully on other Kernels without sleeping itself to death...?

Also I believe ondemand does not feature a "sleep" profile as other governors do, so the frequency shouldn't be managed during sleep. Am I wrong?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] franciscofranco:
#2 is out. Please take your time to read the changelog to prevent repeated questions :)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] dereknas:
bro, link for v2 is dead.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] franciscofranco:
Indeed fixed.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] ys222:
WOW

Great to see you here :-)

This phone really need some "GPU boost" as it's display behavior is somehow "laggging" :-)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] krushin:
great work franco.

In the world of benchmarks dont matter From #1 to #2... +120 Quadrant, -50 passmark. hehe

Can't wait to see whats instore! keep up the good work
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] ys222:
First try

kernel: V2

ROM: roket v22

preformance went down to 3200 in the Quadrant and around 3800 at the AnTuTu (was 6000 before)

1. what have I done wrong ?

2. what is your base ROM ?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] skd:
Mate, problem occurs if the phone screen goes off while landscape mode... But you can unlock the screen like everything is normal (screen looks weird but works as usual). If you can unlock it then it will be normal while you turn the screen to portrait mode... Voila... :)

---------- Post added at 06:20 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:17 AM ----------

OK master there is no problem for me :) I'm continue to use NoLED. Could I learn the cause you don't want to integrate BLN to your kernel? Has it side effects?

Thanks again for that great kernel...
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Rigby2011:
With tegrak oc app i can set this kernel max 1600 mhz. Is this a safe app?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] sangalaviral:
Thank You very much!!!!

This kicked me out of the pixel-salad-club :D
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] krazman325:
You can fine tune it higher. Look in optimization. HOWEVER, I tried this app @ 1660. Slowed down my Note and introduced a very noticeable lag every time I tapped anything to do anything. Uninstalled and got refund from G Play.

Stock ROM with franco.kernel v.test is fast and smooth. This trial of Tegrak cured my desire to OC my Note!

kraz
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] albireox:
Thanks! It seems to work although I don't know how it manages to do that. I'll test it...
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] dimi75-xda:
My findings for test kernel:

VPN problems (PPTP) which have been introduced in #9 seem to be resolved

On #8 I sometimes had a "delayed wake-up" ~10sec - Now it's always immediate ~1sec

Making a backup from within CWM still doesn't work :(
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] grgsiocl:
as per OP instructions, it is better to clean all the scripts and let the kernel do its JOB!:p
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] albireox:
The app is safe and it's working, the overclocking is not "safe", as usual :). Every processor is different, some could handle OC well, others don't. Do it at your own risk.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] lrcquest:
running on the test version with Chrack's small V14. Screen blank black after ringing once. Pressed power button to reboot the phone. Ok after reboot.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] notegalaxy:
Tegrak ultimate doesnt work for me. Get failed to run insmod error when trying to load overclock module
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] eagleofdeath13:
@notegalaxy : do you know what read mean? do you know that explanation are always on first post? Haven't you read that this kernel CAN'T BE OC OR UV?

Or, in a shorter way : RTFT!

(Read The F******* Thread)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] albireox:
Have you installed and tested Tegrak Overclock Ultimate, or you're just talking... Please revise your attitude and don't just say things without testing first. Yes, Tegrak app WORKS with this kernel. Tested it.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] notegalaxy:
I do know this. And i do know oc and uv are not supported. However if YOU read the f****** thread you'd see a previous comment claiming that the app is working well.

I confirmed that it is not and that you get an insmod error. Did i ask whether the kernel can be oc or uv? No. I was confirming that a previous post was incorrect. Maybe keep your ego out of here because i doubt its welcome.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] albireox:
I don't know what to say. I use Franco's test build and I have no problems loading the oc module.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Rigby2011:
You read like sh!t, i oc this kernel to 1600 mhz with tegrak oc app :p
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] notegalaxy:
Thats interesting. My error was on version 9 build. May give the testing version a shot. Perhaps the change of base is allowing oc now. Fun fun!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] zviki:
Here we go... :-D :-D

Yes,yes... it's a fault of kernel #9. :-D :-D
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] notegalaxy:
It works! Thanks guys. Can confirm testing build allows overclock to 1.6 in tegrak overclock ultimate. Seems stable so far! Woop.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] iarapilot:
I have had the same problem. That fixed it. Thanks.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] notegalaxy:
Blimey. Got 5128 in quadrant on test build with 1.6ghz. Deadline. 267/400 gpu. Its insanely fast
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] franciscofranco:
Yes this crap is very fast. Im on 74% left with 17h without charging...never seen this before.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] sotmax:
Franco feedback.

On my lab i ve test the kernel from the new sources on 7 notes including mine.4 of them was lb1 and the others la4 i think.

No pixel salad so far.Still testing battery drain.

Notuce that on 3 of 4 lb1 's we had pixel salada after lock screen and not anymore.

It seems that it was the source probably...

over the air on galaxy note...
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] notegalaxy:
Its a really nice kernel. I can report that with my setup it was not stable and kept on sleep of deathing. Ive reduced gpu to 267 so will see if that was causing it. I had a quick look and my quadrant score is one of the highest ever! You rock man!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] sotmax:
Also at this torch works with different levels...on everyone..

over the air on galaxy note...
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] bkeaver:
is there any solution to the black screen after coming off of a call yet?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] thoriig:
Use the testkernel since release. Works like charm with lc1 stock. Fast and smooth. No drain. No problem at all.

Have got rev 1.1 note
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Chrack:
Here are some Screens.

I lost 1% in 13h over Night in Deep Sleep with Data off.

Thats your best Kernel at the moment Franco :thumbup:

Use it in the small Version of my Rom.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] lrcquest:
The test build has the version number 8?

Sent from Galaxy Note via XDA Premium
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] justsimple1:
Same here... here are some screen shots... my stats starts from 94%!...

Sent from " THE NOTE "
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] sotmax:
yes it is....
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] Rigby2011:
Removed tegrak oc, did not gain performance. Only benchmark scores where better but browsing speed whas the same. I love this kernel.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] notegalaxy:
Better to select noop or deadline in this testing kernel? I cannot see the difference with either! (changed through tegrak)

wow!! this is so so fast.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] kzakaria:
The Torch finally works

The Torch finally works with three different levels. Awesome job!!!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] The Stranger:
Wouw...

Amazing, this kernel rocks man, thank you for your work and sharing this super fast, good battery saving, excellent peace of work with us... :D
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Android Development] knightnz:
It even makes the phone usable with PowerSave mode on and only 1 CPU core enabled (or whatever it does to the CPU)! :)

Getting roughly 4800 in Quadrant at standard settings in CheckROM. (Yes, I know Quadrant etc..) - And that's with Viber, Trillian, CSIP, 3GWatcher, Tasker, and various other stuff in the background.

Very pleased!

Any point running any of the SQL optimisations etc?