yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] naturallyfrozen:
UnNamed?

NoSig
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] howtomen:
This isnt in the right section man.....
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] JohnMcW:
Yes, I have written to the Moderater to ask for it to be moved
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] LiLChris06:
UnNamed please! :)

Not sure if UnNamed 2 was for 2.2.1 or a mistake but that's what I voted for.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] afrojoc:
Cynogenmod has a pretty awesome purple theme that I love a lot. You should port this for shostock please and thank yyou.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] JohnMcW:
Yes UnNamed 2 is for UnNamed 2.2.1
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] AntwanL:
UnNamed 1.3.2
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] exynos5250x:
Ermm on none xD, jk jk to purple for my taste hehehe =]
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] votinh:
It would be nice themeing it with light orange color rather than purple.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] LiLChris06:
We have a few orange themes, while purple I don't think we have. :p

Pink would be fun for the ladies as well.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] JohnMcW:
JPurpleTiger Theme V1.0 Released 2/9/12

J Purple Tiger Theme For UnNamed 2 released

Download JPurpleTiger Theme for UnNamed 2.2.1
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Waddle:
For orange, check out my orange theme for unnamed. Much has been improved since the last version. http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1457742
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] JohnMcW:
JPurpleTiger theme for UnNamed 1.3.2

Added link for JPurpleTiger Theme for UnNamed 1.3.2

Download JPurpleTiger Theme for UnNamed 1.3.2
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] votinh:
The Orange looks cool.

You know why I like Orange? 'cuz Orange is meant for Receiving, while Green likely for Providing LOL :D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] JohnMcW:
Will Work On SHOstock next

Next Rom update for this theme will be SHOStock.

Possibly by Monday.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] JohnMcW:
Added SHOstock compatibility

~~~~~~~~~~ SHOstock 1.9.1 ~~~~~~~~~~~

Swype added

Download JPurpleTiger Theme for SHOstock 1.9.1

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] JohnMcW:
update for SHOStock 1.9.2

Download JPurpleTiger Theme for SHOstock 1.9.2
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] JohnMcW:
Update for SHOstock 1.9.3

Added Version for SHOstock 1.9.3

Download JPurpleTiger Theme for SHOstock 1.9.3
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] brent8577:
any other download links? this asks fot login.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] JohnMcW:
If it does ask for login, login is free,

but If you have other places to load to, I would welcome any suggestions, I have not been able to find anywhere since MultiUpload went down.
[Droid 2 General] Albinoman:
Any d2 rom will work on the r2d2.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] tringuyen14:
Hi,

I was very excited to get my Skyrocket, but after a day of using it, people I called to reported that there's a weird problem with the call audio quality. For a few seconds my voice seems to be muted out, like speaking very distant. This has gone on for many calls at different locations.

Frustrated, I sent the first one back and got another one. It came today and I was very excited. I tried it and there was no problem. Then a couple of hours later, the same problem came on.

This is really weird. I don't think it's a hardware problem since it has happened on both phones, the second of which is brand new. Makes me wonder if it's a software problem. But this did not happen on my HTC Inspire which had the same set of apps as the Skyrocket.

Does anybody encounter the same problem? Know any tests/ fix for the issue? Or even heard of something similar?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] shorty473:
Do you have a case on your phone? If so, perhaps it's covering the mic???
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] nap286:
I've noticed this phone needs to be right up On Your face for anyone to hear you..
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Longcat14:
Disable the setting that is mic noise cancellation, that's what is causing it.

Sent from my Rocket that is in the Sky!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] lyndone58:
I am having the same issue where my voice seems fading/distant according to anyone I talk to. I exchanged it once and still have the same problem. I don't really know the problem so I just use BT headset for calls.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] nap286:
Mines not on
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Longcat14:
Hmmm... my phone was doing the same thing, turned off noise cancellation, fixed.

Sent from my Rocket that is in the Sky!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] krazylove:
I have had the identical problem as the original poster. I received my Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket on January 18, 2012. Starting immediately, during phone calls, the other party would tell me that my voice cut out, sounded distant and tinny for a few seconds at a time. When using a bluetooth headset, the problem never occurs, so I ruled out the mobile network as the cause of the problem. I do not have a case for my phone, so that is not the cause of the problem.

I exchanged the phone for a brand new Skyrocket, which I received on February 3, 2012. Same problem with the new phone. I am nearly sure the problem is with the noise cancellation hardware/software. It seems to get worse if I hold the phone touching my ear (the noise cancellation microphone is on the top edge, near where the phone will touch the ear).

Besides this defect, I like the phone a lot. Now I must decide whether to use the phone with noise cancellation turned off, or give up on Skyrocket, return the phone, and choose another Android phone.

Are all Skyrocket owners using their phones with noise cancellation turned off? This is a very serious defect.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] shaggyskunk:
No problem on mine.... with or without noise cancellation... in spite of what you said, it does sound like a network issue... do you notice this everywhere, or just in some locations?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] krazylove:
It has occurred in many different locations.

In the course single phone call, I can experience the problem using the handset, then switch to a headset and the problem stops, and then go back to the handset and the problem picks up again. I am going to start using the handset with noise cancellation turned off, and I'll report back on how that works.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] lyndone58:
My observations:

No issues when using bluetooth headset or loudspeaker.

I experience the problem when using the wired headset, and handset with or without noise cancellation.

I probably have a defective phone but did not bother to exchange it again. I use bluetooth headset all the time.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] kr3w1337:
Had the same problem as you. I got a SIM replacement and turned off noise cancellation.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Ashyford:
Mic Issue Continues

After looking into reviews of this phone, and subsequently buying one in June, I can't believe I missed this issue. Alas, over the past few months, most recipients of my calls as well as callers to me cannot hear me unless I'm speaking loudly into the phone. To make matters worse, I can't simply tilt the phone to my mouth and back to my ear because the motion sensor will activate the screen and my cheek will touch the "end call" button. I have already turned off noise suppression and still, it's a problem. I have already "talked loudly" and then normally, and still, no dice. I have also switched to speakerphone, then back to normal and still, no dice. This is painful. It makes the "phone" useless. (I have not tried switching to Sky ICS.)

Has anyone found a solution to this design flaw besides a headset? Will adjusting the mic gain work? If so, what code do I need to adjust the mic gain?

Rooted Skyrocket. AOKP Milestone 6
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] SimonNWalker:
My wife is having this exact same problem on her Skyrocket too.

She was on the official ICS from ATT and then I tried CM9 and nothing seems to make any difference.

Anyone found any more info?

You think it's worth exchanging the phone or just a bad design in the hardware?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Ashyford:
I hear installing the Sky ICS ROM may solve the problem. If that is the case, then it is not a hardware design flaw but possibly noise suppression run amok (regardless of whether the option is unchecked). That would seem to be consistent given the mic location has not changed in the Galaxy line of phones. Further, speakerphone works flawlessly.

If Sky ICS works or if I find a "mic gain" solution, I will report back.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] yenkoPR:
guys try rooting ur skyrocket and flashing a new kernel
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] legion1911:
GT-P6200XXLB2

means:

GT-P6200 device

XX = Europe (DX = Asia)

L = 2012

B = February

2 = Version 2
[Galaxy S II General] scaramonga:
Done a test over past two days.

Flashed ICS LPB, set up WiFi and signed in to Google, installed betterbatterystats, and touched nothing else. Left overnight between 1am and 10am, exactly.

Battery @ 69% on screen on.

Flashed Batista Rom (random for the sake of it) wiped kernel using cleaning script and installed SpeedMod K-19 kernel (random for the sake of it), set up WiFi and signed in to Google, installed betterbatterystats, and touched nothing else. Left overnight between 1am and 10am, exactly.

Battery @ 99% on screen on.

2 Partial Wakelocks on ICS were noticeable that I could see.

Audioout_1 showing 9 hours of activity, and WiFi showing the same. Nothing of interest on GB.

Interesting to me :) as I really don't have a clue otherwise, but maybe others can do same test?

Obviously not running LPB now ;)
[Galaxy S II General] mathsmart:
Audioout can be disable by turning off touch sound or somthing like that in sound menu :)

Envoyé depuis mon GT-I9100 avec Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II General] TheSaw:
I also have LPB, and I am signed in to Google all night, with wifi on. I lose about 5%, which is still too much, but manageable.
[Galaxy S II General] crachel:
There are several LPB threads already. Please use one of those.

Closed.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Overstew:
I keep hearing that gps conflict is messing up the lte deployment for Sprint. Does this mean all of Sprint's lte plans are delayed or do they have Clearwire also backing them up? I don't fully understand Sprints situation.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] ewynn9:
No. SPrint has their own LTE. They wanted Lightsquared spectrum so they could expand the network wider and faster.

Didn't mean to hit thanks on your post.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] flight01:
Sprint is building out its own network and was gonna lease from third parties like light squared. Sprint already gave them till like June to figure it out or they are gonna lease from another or build out its own network in the places it was gonna use it
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] dtm_stretch:
You made a great summary. Just curious do you have a source for this information I'd like to read more on the ability to cover the whole US.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] ungovernable1977:
So sprints own LTE wont be just 'outdoor' (like wimax... ****.)... Hope they build something with reasonable wall penetration...
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] postq:
Seeing as how most gps "devices" are simply receivers and the "transmitters" are Dept. of Defense satellites, please explain to me how "GPS providers were sacrificing precision for reliability and allowed their spectrum use to get sloppy in order to avoid service interruptions"....Please provide us some names of these gps providers that are at fault for Lightsquared's bad business decisions....

GPS manufacturers already have filters engineered for the quiet neighborhood of the satellite spectrum. They cannot be expected to use filters that would either greatly increase cost, size and reduce accuracy to filter out signals that would be, and currently are illegal. Nor could they be expected to see the future and design a filter for a network whose actual broadcast strength and frequencies would not even be known until 2011. And finally, as the testing from the first half of 2011, no filter would have worked against LightSquared's first network configuration.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] sfhub:
Lightsquared is NOT putting up Satellite-based LTE available with the "flip of a switch"

Lightsquared bought and consolidated frequencies meant for satellite use and are repurposing for land-based use. They got the approvals for land-based use and were contracting Sprint to include support for their frequencies on Sprint *towers* as part of Sprint's NV plans. There may be some minor satellite-based component, but the bulk of the network was supposed to be tower-based, specifically on Sprint's towers.

They ran into the GPS issues which they are currently fighting. It has become a snafu with all sides politicizing it.

To Sprint it would have been just supporting extra frequencies on top of their own 800ESMR and 1900PCS and would have meant additional revenue from Lightsquared for the build out and also opportunites to have extra LTE capacity for Sprint users.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] cds0699:
What friggin good is "outdoor" lte. I want to be able to use LTE inside my home, work, etc. I'll be damned if I'm gonna step outside every time I wanna use LTE on my cell phone.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] squshy 7:
You're way off base on this. The plan is a hybrid of both satellite and terrestrial (tower) coverage, and sprint was contracted to build towers for light squared (not light squared piggy backing off of sprint towers).

The upside for sprint is 1. They get paid to do it, and 2. They get first dibs on some wholesale chunks of lightsquareds LTE (since lightsquared isn't planning on being an ISP, but a network wholeselling to ISPs)

You're pretty off base as well. The GPS manufacturers actually did "know the future", as it were, considering they endorsed the FCC deal when lightsquared bought the spectrum a decade ago. Also, it's a known truth that affected devices are older, legacy devices that were designed to "look into" the spectrum that light squared now owns...however that degree of effect is lost in the media.

Some informative reading on just how much these receivers are "hindered" and other bureaucratic nonsense:

http://www.amerisurv.com/content/view/9565/2/

http://m.androidcentral.com/lightsquared-claims-government-testing-rigged-gps-industry-insiders
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] sfhub:
It takes a lot of work to get new towers approved through local government. Why would you think Sprint would be building new towers for Lightsquared vs using their existing ones?
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] squshy 7:
Um, because that's what my uppers told me we were doing? Lol, go back to the network vision announcement, it's spelled out pretty clearly. Sprint is more or less the contractor for building the physical towers...I don't know who deals with all the government nonsense involved, considering Lightsquared will own the towers.

The main selling point behind it, and why it makes sense, is that it greatly helps offset the cost of the iPhone, considering sprint is getting paid somewhere between 2-7 billion for it (i don't remember the figure off the top of my head) over the course of the construction.

Now, will sprint convert some existing infrastructure? Sure, if it's cost and network effective, that only makes sense.

The only issue is that lightsquared's frequency isn't part of sprint's multi-modal tower design, so lightsquared towers will likely be stand alone. So, in this case, i view converting and constructing as effectively the same. Though without the whole construction part. But yes, for sure, lightsquared will own the towers.

I do apologize though, as i slightly misinterpreted your comment
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] sfhub:
Lightsquared got their L-band spectrum from Immarsat and SkyTerra. It was originally for satellite, then FCC allowed SkyTerra "ancillary" terrestrial transmitters, now the terrestrial component is becoming the dominant component and the satellite component much smaller part of the picture.

This is a good history for Lightsquared

http://www.forbes.com/sites/danielf...ones-lightsquared-faces-enemies-on-all-sides/

The rest of the industry didn't really pay attention to what Falcone put together because they assumed it would cost Lightsquared more to provide the dual satellite/terrestrial network.

They started paying real close attention when Lightsquared applied to sell terrestrial-only cellular plans (effectively taking their L-band spectrum and competing directly with traditional cell companies) Sprint was contracted to build the terrestrial network using Lightsquared spectrum. Sprint was only too happy to do this since it fit in very nicely with their NV plans.

It would be minimum effort to add LTE support for Lightsquared spectrum during NV expansion. It would be more effort to go back and do it afterwards. This is why Sprint is putting time limits on Lightsquared to get their ducks lined up.

---------- Post added at 06:48 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:45 AM ----------

Well Sprint would be more like the General Contractor, because Sprint is contracting out to others to do the work, even for NV.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] squshy 7:
Haha, exactly. That's what really gets me. But, it does make sense, Sprint already has a long relationship with Ericsson and others.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] sfhub:
You would know better than me, but I was under the impression Sprint "outsourced" all the tower maintenance to Ericsson, and Ericsson basically just hired the Sprint people that used to be in charge of that stuff to kick start everything.

According to this article the Sprint deal with Lightsquared was to have Sprint host Lightsquared's terrestrial LTE network:

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2389312,00.asp

Maybe the article got it wrong, but it sure seems like Sprint towers are what were being proposed to host Lightsquared's LTE network.

If Sprint (via their contractors) was really building brand new towers for Lightsquared, I can't see the uproar from Verizon and ATT as it would take forever for them to get coverage going through local governments for new tower approvals. Piggybacking on Sprint's network, they would be a nationwide competitor in the same timespan as Sprint's LTE network.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Overstew:
Anyone know where I can find the list of cities that are getting first dibs on Sprint's LTE?
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] sfhub:
http://s4gru.spruz.com/pt/Sprints-N...eployment-details-emerge-for-Chicago/blog.htm
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] elliwigy:
Phonearena.com and phonescoop should have the news if you look for it

Sent from my E4GT with MiUi!
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] elliwigy:
And the gps issue and the fcc is correct :-) .. It's only been in the news for a while now. Surprised so many didn't know this already.. Sprint was relying on lightsquared.. Fcc is giving them issues.. Sprint doesn't even have 4g in phoenix, so lame. Who cares if people outside the limits of gps can't use it. lightsquared should be able to use a spectrum not previously used if you asked me :-(

Sent from my E4GT with MiUi!
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] postq:
With all due respect, are you suggesting that GPS manufacturers should have put in filters in 2003 to filter Lightsquared transmissions consistent with Lightsquared's operating proposal initially ? There is overwhelming consensus that this is not that easy nor inexpensive. Testing done in 1Q 2010, consistent with the initial Lightsquared proposal and in which they participated fully, indicated great difficulty with an filter based solution. The evidence was so clear, and the difficulty so great, that Lightsquared gave up there initial proposal almost immediately and revised their operating plan, abandoning any current plans to use the upper frequency band, and reducing transmitted power on the lower frequency band.

Suggesting that it would have been simple and inexpensive for GPS manufacturers to put filters into their equipment in 2003 to filter out both of Lightsquared's bands at the initial higher radiated power when in 2011 it was considered too difficult a problem to solve in a timely manner would seem to be ridiculous, don't you think?

So, if you're not suggesting THAT, then are you suggesting that GPS receiver manufacturers should have known in 2003 that Lightsquared would adjust their operating plan by forfeiting use of the upper band and reducing power in the lower band in 2011. Lightsquared didn't even know about this plan of theirs until last summer! How in the world could GPS manufacturers designed filters around the current Lightsquared proposal when it was not even known until less than a year ago? Should they have a had a crystal ball?
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Epix4G:
So you are saying that I can buy a radio station at say 98.7 and broadcast all the way up to 100.6 and down to 96.9 ..... well of course not the GPS manufacturer should have used what frequency they could and not infringe on others who bought their frequency too

The ones in the wrong were the GPS manufacturer and the regulatory FCC for not making sure it was right
[General Questions and Answers] Ricfil:
Hello all. Im´on Android 2.2.1 on a Milestone. I´ve already read some stuff regarding the pretty bad idea (in my opinion) off google geting rid of the volume rocker sound options -volume -vibrate-silent form V.2.1 to 2.2. It seems 2.2 users must live with that or use an external app to do the trick Android 2.1 already did. Something I did not see discussed anywhere (which really annoys me even more) are two things on V.2.2:

The sd card mounting notification disable option disapeard from the settings. Is there a way to bring it back? Hate that awfull sound always poping out whenever the phone powers on.

When powering off the phone, just before it turns completely off it produces an annoying vibration. Anyone knows a way to change that, so that the vibration disapears?

Hope someone as a clue about this issues. Would love to get rid of them. I bet many think the same way.

Thanks all. :)

See you
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zamiurratul:
I am a newbie here. learned quite from the forum. but still now i just dont know what is init.d and what is the purpose of scripts. If any one would be kind enough to explain me about this things, it will be great. Thanx in advance.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] AurosGamma:
Well, init.d is a directory located in /etc/ ( a directory ). Basically, it contains scripts used to start/stop services used by the system.

A script, is like a programming language, in certain ways easier but they come handy in some occasions. A script is a simple ASCII file containing a set of orders ( commands interpreted by the Operating System ), sequentially read and executed line by line.

For example, I could create a script for Linux, that handles my Wireless network, so it can be used by the system, for example:

ip link set eth0 down
ip link set wlan0 up
wpa_supplicant -B -Dwext -i wlan0 -c /etc/wpas.conf
dhcpcd wlan0

The code above is in essence a script, these commands do the following:

Shuts down the ethernet connection

Turns on my wireless card

Connects to my Wireless network, this information contained in the wpas.conf file

Starts dhcpcd service for the wireless cards, so, it automatically sets IP,etc...

Another clear example ( if you read the forums) is the lippol's cleaning script for the SGS. This script basically executes commands that mounts partitions, search and deletes residual files left by older ROMs. In this case, this is not a script located in init.d because there's no "service" to start, the script only deletes some files ( I think, I haven't read it).

I hope I explained myself clearly. Cheers

P.S. Excuse my english
[Samsung Infuse 4G] dman3285:
Next week the how to for the extended power menu... :)
[Samsung Infuse 4G] crash822:
Should be stickied and title maybe changed to simple android mods

Sent from my Samsung Infuse
[Samsung Infuse 4G] dman3285:
not gonna happen... its good here for all to view..