[Galaxy S II General] Entropy512:
You are great at it, and you are still at it.

Again, your initial claim was made here. In that post you are clearly still differentiating between Lionheart (void) and LionheartX (Phoenix). You directly attack someone who exposes the truth about Lionheart as a liar - well, the problem is that their quote as stated there is the truth. That post was made at a time when the new governor was still called LionheartX.

At the time you made that post, Lionheart and LionheartX were still two different governors. The person you attacked as a liar was referring to Lionheart, you were referring to Lionheart, and it was clear I was referring to the original Lionheart in my response here - after all that's the Lionheart code right there in the diff.

Even before you renamed Void to Phoenix, I know that at least once you pressured droidphile to change his description of Lionheart to be more favorable to you (I know that at one point, he described it like it was - tuned conservative with a reduced polling rate.) Note to users who say to handle things via PM - This is why this situation was not handled via PM. I saw droidphile's description and didn't like it, but assumed he was a knzo supporter, unaware that knzo had applied pressure on him via PM to change the description. It's obvious that you want to have things like this handled via PM so that you can hide the truth.

Then why do you refer to them by different names at this point? If you thought we were all talking about LionheartX, you should have said LionheartX. Here's another example of how you go out of your way to mislead people and hide the truth - At the point when this discussion started, Lionheart and LionheartX were two clearly different governors, and the first post of your kernel thread described the new governor as LionheartX. There is no possible way anyone could have thought that we were talking about X.

Since then you have renamed LionheartX back to Lionheart to confuse the situation and make your arguments look better - when the fact is that this rename was performed AFTER the discussion on Lionheart started in order to mislead users.

Regardless of this, your language is MUCH more favorable to you in your claims regarding the original Lionheart back in the void days:

Your very words "highly tweaked and patched" - You backported mainline changes that didn't affect performance, applied one performance patch (reducing polling rate limits), and changed two defaults for things that users could change with SetCPU. Not, by any means, highly tweaked.

Then your next words "put together by myself" - Not a single line of code in Lionheart other than deletion of comments to hide its origins (there is no legitimate technical reason for deleting ALL comments in a source code file) was your own.

Yet again - We were talking about Lionheart and not LionheartX - Now you are trying to confuse people and mislead them by renaming LionheartX back to Lionheart and saying we were all wrong.

Arighi's patch cannot in any way be applied to the conservative governor. In his patch, he disables a feature of the Ondemand governor where it does not make any state transitions for 40 seconds on booting - arighi's patch removes this. Conservative has no such on-boot behavior - so there's no way you applied arighi's patch to conservative.

The patch in question is https://github.com/arighi/linux-gt-i9100/commit/ee69f4c39f61a94b6ff0dcd3ef9172e527958048 - Read it, it's against cpufreq_ondemand.c and removes the 40-second boot delay WHICH DOES NOT EXIST IN CONSERVATIVE. THEREFORE YOU COULD NOT HAVE REMOVED IT.

As I understand it - Aprold was the one doing the app work. Thus we were not attacking him. I feel sorry for him if he was unaware he was working with a prolific liar, but don't bring him into this argument and claim I was attacking him, because I never did. I have been very clear that my issue is with your blatantly false claims regarding the provenance of "your" governor, and your subsequent attempts to hide history by playing rename-the-governor games to make the situation more confusing. He made no false claims regarding Lionheart or other people's work, therefore I have no issue with him. YOU are the one bringing him into this, not I.