yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[HTC Flyer, EVO View 4G] gordonzhao:
I figured as much as I found the sonic adventures rom, they are 600+ megs but that's not an issue (in my opinion). I guess I'll have to stick to pc emulation or the stock consoles for now but will keep hunting for other emulators for tabs/android. Thanks for the info.

Sent from my Rooted HTC EVO View 4G (Honeycomb)
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] xda890:
My wife has gotten a SE Experia Arc S and looks good... Only problem is that she is using GO SMS Pro as SMS app, and when SMS is received and read using GO SMS, the SMS count on the lockscreen is not updated... Any way to fix this?

Regards,

BTJ
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] soldiers33:
I believe the lockscreen notifications only work with stock app.
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] xda890:
I.e. one have to open the stock app to reset the counter on the lockscreen?

Guess installing WidgetLocket Lockscreen is an option...

BTJ
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zangetsu2188:
Just uncheck the 'Notifications' in the settings of the Messaging stock app.

Problem solved, no more notifications from the stock app :)
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] xda890:
Hmmm... I was about to say that I had already done that but got a bit uncertain, have to check; I might have forgotten it... (A)

Thx...

BTJ
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] batwingnz:
That removes notifications from the notification bar but not the lockscreen. I never found a way to disable this on my mini pro my arc except by running cm instead of stock rom
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] xda890:
That's what I thought... Guess I should tell her to try WidgetLocker... :)

BTJ
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Flo95:
Try to delete "LockscreenNotifications.apk" from system/app

But make a backup - just in case the phone acts up
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] batwingnz:
Backups are for *******, I'll try it later.

No such apk
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sacentre:
Can anyone answer this? I don't have a problem right now. I'm just interested in learning how this works.

On my Note, the number shown in Messaging > Settings > Message Centre is +6596197777 which is the correct number for Singapore where I live.

However, the number shown by the code string *#*#4636#*#* > Phone Information > SMSC: > Refresh is "06915669917777".

Why are these two numbers different? Is the second one a different format?

Why I'm Asking

I came across a number of posts on various forums describing problems with sending sms (while still being able to receive) and I had this problem myself for a while.

1. Many posts said that the way to fix this problem was to get into the testing menu with *#*#4636#*#* and input the number in the SMSC: field and hit the "Update" button.

2. However, when I tried entering +6596197777, it returned "Update Error"

3. If I leave the field blank (it's always blank by default), and hit Refresh then

"06915669917777" appears.

4. I was able to send sms messages successfully with this number BUT WITH NO number entered in the Messaging > Settings > Message Centre.

5. I assumed (probably wrongly) that the Message Centre number was embedded on the SIM card when supplied by the telco.

Thanks in advance for any help with how this works.

Trevor
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] EdgaBimbam:
i had similar problem with miui on my samsung s2, for me helped like this: put another sim card, send sms and than put back that main sim card. Maybe it will help :)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Bassarnis:
Hello sacentre,

I had a similar experience with my x10 when i updated to gingerbread 2.3.3. I tried messing with the settings, and after a lot of factory resets and google search, only one thing solved it. I can't guarantee if this will work for you, but here it goes.

1. Go to your local ISP and ask them to replace your SIM with a new one. (the reason behind this is that there might be an issue with old SIM cards, even if they are only a few months old) In most countries they allow you to keep the same number.

2. Power down phone and remove the old SIM card.

3. Power on the phone without the SIM card.

4. Power off phone.

5. Power it on with the new SIM card inserted.

The above did the job for me. If all else fails, factory reset.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sacentre:
Hi, thanks for the replies.

It's one of those things where the picture gradually evolves over time and is far more complicated than I'd thought (no surprise really). It's interesting though. As I said at the start of the thread, I can send sms correctly but I'd like to know more about how the software/firmware works and what these damn numbers mean.

The trick of putting the SIM card into another phone and attempting to enter the Message Centre number there was suggested a couple of times on the forums.

When I took the phone to my telco, that's the first thing they tried after I asked them to check and/or replace the SIM card. This confirmed my assumptions that

1. the number is embedded on the SIM card by the telco when supplied with the mobile contract.

2. the phone reads the number from the SIM card and the number should appear in the SMSC: field in the Testing menu when the Refresh button is hit. This doesn't happen. Even when I tried it the first time, all I was getting was "00" but later the different number as I describe above appeared. It works however but I still want to know why the number is different from the one in the Messaging app.

The staff at my telco had no knowledge of the Testing menu and emphatically claimed it was a third party app I'd installed illegally until I got one of them to key in the code on their own phone and see the menu for themselves!

Neither they nor I noticed that the phone's Messaging app did not have any Message Centre number entered at the time. I was still able to send sms with no number entered.

I learn a little more each day thanks to contributors on these forums. Thanks again.

Trevor
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ocz85:
Hi all,

I have been changing custom roms almost every time,AOSP,Sense and MIUI,kernels,radios.

The problem is my wifi range is not far. It always needs to be at least few feet from the router to get coverage.

Any suggestion?

I am currently running :

ROM : Hydrogen 2.2 FINAL

Kernel :Lordmod 8.7b CFS

Radio : 12.62.60.27U_26.13.04.19_M

Thank you.
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] z0rk:
Strange, if you tried different radios...

Mine is 12.28b.60.140eU_26.03.02.15_M3, you might try to flash this one and see if it gets any better, if it doesn't, I suppose it's a hardware related problem (contact your reseller).
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ocz85:
Thanks dude. Yeah, i have tried radios like !2.65, 12.62,12.54 etc.. coverage for phone is perfect,but for wifi it sucks a lot. Terrible i must say. Have to be real close to the router where else my Bold and Ipad can even go further.

I will give the radio you recommend a try. What i realized is that,whenever i put my palm to cover the battery cover,it seems that the wifi coverage dropping.

I know that,the antenna is at the battery slot,but that means it has to do with hardware,not kernel,radio of firmware.
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ocz85:
CONFIRMED!! my DHD has a problem for its WIFI - Antenna.

Most radio n kernel tried. but none solved the problem.
[HTC Wildfire S] osamamattar:
in my bootloader there is an option called image crc what is the point of that option what does it work thx
[HTC Wildfire S] en0c:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1220999
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] Przekret:
N7000XXLA4:

PDA: N7000XXLA4

PHONE: N7000NELA1

CSC: N7000DREKL1

# begin build properties
# autogenerated by buildinfo.sh
ro.build.id=GINGERBREAD
ro.build.display.id=GINGERBREAD.XXLA4
ro.build.version.incremental=XXLA4
ro.build.version.sdk=10
ro.build.version.codename=REL
ro.build.version.release=2.3.6
ro.build.date=Thu Jan 12 21:03:18 KST 2012
ro.build.date.utc=1326369798
ro.build.type=user
ro.build.user=se.infra
ro.build.host=SEP-74
ro.build.tags=release-keys
ro.product.model=GT-N7000
ro.product.brand=samsung
ro.product.name=GT-N7000
ro.product.device=GT-N7000
ro.product.board=GT-N7000
ro.product.cpu.abi=armeabi-v7a
# Samsung Specific Properties
ro.build.PDA=N7000XXLA4
ro.build.hidden_ver=N7000XXLA4
ro.build.changelist=886827
ro.product.cpu.abi2=armeabi
ro.product.manufacturer=samsung
ro.product.locale.language=en
ro.product.locale.region=GB
ro.wifi.channels=
ro.board.platform=s5pc210
# ro.build.product is obsolete; use ro.product.device
ro.build.product=GT-N7000
# Do not try to parse ro.build.description or .fingerprint
ro.build.description=GT-N7000-user 2.3.6 GINGERBREAD XXLA4 release-keys
ro.build.fingerprint=samsung/GT-N7000/GT-N7000:2.3.6/GINGERBREAD/XXLA4:user/release-keys
# Samsung Specific Properties
ro.build.PDA=N7000XXLA4
ro.build.hidden_ver=N7000XXLA4
ro.build.changelist=886827
ro.tether.denied=false
ro.flash.resolution=1080
# end build properties

Download:

http://hotfile.com/dl/143953552/790840c/GT-N7000_DRE_N7000XXLA4_N7000DREKL1_N7000NELA1.zip.html
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] vcespon:
And the difference with this one posted HERE more than one week ago?

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1452033
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] EdgaBimbam:
i think it is the same just for other region or country
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ofraofra:
Hi there!

I'm not allowed yet to post in the development section, so I decided to put my question here... Please don't shoot me :)

I have read many threads from the Development Section (when got the time), tested a few Roms and Kernels. All of the developers are doing a great job, every day (my donations are going to eugene373, mathkid95 & peter alfonso).

I had no idea how a Nexus S can "move" with a custom Rom or Kernel.

I'm kinda new in this "root affair" with my phone, and i found a superb combination between Bugless Beast Rom & Matr1x 15 Kernel. For that i have posted some screen shots.

In order to achieve those results, i used LiveOC to 105 but i didn't changed the voltages. Oh, and Lulzactive/Sio. When i put the phone to charge, i had a freeze, and a battery pull was needed.

So, can someone tell me if i need to change the voltages too for that combination to be stable? If so, which are the best voltages?

Thank all of you in advance!

P.S.: I use i9023 LCD. With eugene373's Speedy 7 & stock ICS i had no reboots or freezes, but the battery is not that great. Although, the phone is unbelievably fast.
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Harbb:
They're decent results, the i9023's screen generally uses more power due to the backlight. Matr1x kernel is undervolted and some phones don't like it. For LiveOC i would DEFINITELY pump up the voltages (say +25mV across the board, except 100mhz and 200mhz as matr1x has them stock). Keep messing around with the voltages until you find the lowest voltage that is happily stable and not overheating.

Your phone may be fine, though. But as the frequency goes up AND matr1x is already undervolted, you'll probably be better off taking it up to 110% and finding somewhere stable there since i believe the minimum voltage change is 25mV.
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ofraofra:
Thank you very much for your answer.

I'll will try to do what you adviced me, but I'm a little bit afraid not to mess up things because I'm just a begginer, as I said...

Best of luck!
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Harbb:
You'll be fine mate, just don't push it too hard until you know what your phone is capable of and make sure heat isn't a problem. Some chips just aren't as lenient as others, but yours seems to take undervolting fairly well which is a good sign.
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dpeeps74:
Also, as you're bumping it up and testing, don't check set on boot. Unless you have a current working nandroid at least.
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] qtwrk:
i think your statment about screen is not completely right.

yes , based on SA screen functionality , it's saves more power then Super Clear LCD screen because SA lights its up by itself , but SC LCD screen needs additional light lay.

but that also depends on color , SA runs brilliant color costs same , or even more juices as SC LCD , but it do save power when shows dark color like black.

this is why android 2.3 status bar color has changed from grey to black , also default wallpaper for Nexus S is dark color.

------------

to OP , about voltages , you only have to change it when you OC and your phone become unstable , live OC usually are able up to 115% or 120% , if you don't OC over 1.0 G but use live OC up to 1.15 G or 1.2 G , you won't be needing change voltage.

but if you use both OC and liveOC , for example by Matr1x, CPU can set up to 1.46G and 115% of LiveOC , max to 1.67 G , in that case you may need change voltage...

yes... this is max i've done , i was afraid that i would get CPU fried...
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Harbb:
I said generally for the amoleds, I'm very aware of how they work. Unless you're staring at an all white screen all day it is quite rare for it to use more power. This is why it is a great technology for mobile phones.

Anywho, it certainly needs additional voltage with liveoc. Please don't misinform others. At 110%, 1GHz becomes 1.1GHz which is plenty to cause instability on many cpus. This is especially true with matr1x and other undervolted kernels.
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] qtwrk:
with all due respect , but i think little bite OC doesn't really need change voltage , because usually , generally , mostly , kernel default setting is enough...
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] nodstuff:
When you live oc an undervolted kernel yes you do need to raise voltages

Regardless if you regular oc or not because if you live oc by 10% you are ocing by 10%. Its not complicated.

Harbb is right.

I know, I'm a tester for matr1x and in being a tester that means I have to test all aspects of it and put it under different strains, overclocking etc.

To the OP:

Live oc by 110% and if you have problems with reboots then raise voltages by 25mv as harbb said already.

And he also gave good advice regarding unchecking the set at boot option in nstools.

Disregard all other comments.
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ofraofra:
Thank you Harbb and Nodstuff!

Very good advices, I've followed them and seems to work ok so far. Seems like I didn't read that much as I thought, because I didn't know that the Matr1x kernel is undervolted. I have to read more infos from here, wish I'd had the time... I was just looking for a good combination between a Rom and a Kernel, because I had terrible battery life on stock ICS. Now I'm pretty happy with the combo mentioned above, thank you again for your help.

I wish you all the best and good luck!
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] sandeep044:
Hello,

I have xperia ray with boot loader unlocked + DoomKernel overclockable to 2GHz and customised themes installed in it.

I have recently downloaded ICS 4.0.1 Alpha ROM from developers.sonyericsson.com/wp for my Ray. It has 3 files, 1: boot.img(approx 5.54MB) , 2.system.img(Approx 264MB) and 3.userdata.img(in KB s).

How do I flash this ROM into my Ray.

Can anyone help!?
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] Gourcuff:
first flash boot.img with flashtool

then put other files in a file and copy to sdcard/clockworkmod/backup

finally use CWM recovery restore
[Off-topic] max_carpenter:
Good Morning Ladies and Gents.

I am posting this today to raise awareness about ACTA and how it is effecting everyone and to raise support against it. If you have heard about ACTA you may or may not be aware of how bad it is or how it will effect everyone including yourself!

So whether or not you have heard of ACTA this video is a must watch for everyone. Share the Video between your friends and family, share it amougst other online communities ACTA must be heard about, It must be stopped!

http://youtu.be/N8Xg_C2YmG0

If you wish to show your support at stopping ACTA please sign the below petition:

http://www.avaaz.org/en/eu_save_the_internet/?fp

Historic post on XDA about ACTA brought to my attention:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=632325
[Off-topic] max_carpenter:
300,000 Signatures today. Thank you to everyone that is watching the video and signing the petition. We really do need to show the people are against this.

Please continue to raise awareness share the video and petition around. And if you haven't signed it allready then please do. We need your support.

Regards,

Max
[Off-topic] LordManhattan:
Done.

696.000 signed :)
[Off-topic] max_carpenter:
Thank you to everyone for your continued support we have now reached 978,430 signatures and the video has been watched a total of 570,907

Please if you haven't already show your support against ACTA. The peition is due to be handed in shortly so help us get to 1 million signatures. Remember you can sign this petition no matter where you are in the world. It effects everyone worldwide!

Video: http://youtu.be/N8Xg_C2YmG0

Petition: http://www.avaaz.org/en/eu_save_the_internet/?fp
[Off-topic] Archer:
To make this a fair thread, could you please post the link where I can sign to show my support for ACTA?
[Off-topic] max_carpenter:
To be honest I have not seen a single place/petition or anything PRO ACTA because to be honest who in the right mind would be for having everything they do in life watched, monitored and recorded / Having someone else decide what they are and are not allowed to see / say. That is the most basic of Human rights removed...

So sorry no link 'FOR' ACTA.
[Off-topic] emirba:
STOP ACTA!
[Off-topic] max_carpenter:
Thanks for the support, Please sign the petition if you haven't already :-)
[Off-topic] Archer:
It's not up to you to decide what other people should believe in then?

Biased thread is biased.
[Off-topic] max_carpenter:
I am not deciding what other people should beleive in or demanding I am simply saying I don't understand why anyone would be 'for' this. There is a difference. I am not saying something like 'Anyone pro ACTA is stupid' It was just simply I couldn't understand it.

And yes I am biased I can openly admit that however I will always listen to counter arguments and you are welcome to give reasons why you are pro ACTA.

Also on the other hand as far as I am aware there are no PRO ACTA Petitions because I have not met a person who would like it so its not just me being biased as to why there is no PRO ACTA links.

I appologise if this upsets you.
[Off-topic] max_carpenter:
999,000 Signatures........ They are rapidly racking up.........
[Off-topic] dexter93:
Its over 1 mil
[Off-topic] max_carpenter:
Yes jumped 999 from the time I saw it to the time I managed to post. Having another massive surge of signatures which is great. Wonder if we can make the 1,500,000 mark....
[Off-topic] kragg5:
stop acta !!!!
[Off-topic] Dirk:
I think the Judiciary should look into this idea that pay-offs made to politicians by big media should be seen as bribes, and as such impeachments should be handed down.
[Off-topic] max_carpenter:
Is there any evidence of these so called 'bribes' though? You can't say they exist without proof and I haven't seen anything like that.

Almost at 1.2 Million. Can we reach their next target of 2 Million signatures?

Alot happening last night and I was too busy so going to catch up with whats happening now....
[Off-topic] Dirk:
Payments made as 'contributions' are of public record, as are funds paid by Lobbyists.

http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=23882
[Off-topic] max_carpenter:
6 REASONS TO BE AGAINST ACTA (Important links at the bottom)

1: SURVEILLANCE: "Currently the internet works a lot like the highway system -- there are rules, and there are police patrolling the information highway looking to make sure those rules are followed. But citizens have the constitutionally guaranteed freedom to travel it without warrantless searches or seizures. Under the new system, it would be as if the highway patrol put a video camera, GPS, and sensor network inside your car tracking your every movement."

2: SECRECY: "The trouble with ACTA is that it was all carried out under the shroud of secrecy and executive orders. The public would never have known about ACTA's wild provisions at all, were it not for a source/sources close to the trade agreement who leaked it to the internet." There is proof that ACTA was first talked about and put in Motion from as early as May 2008 and we are only hearing about it now over 3 years later.

3: CHANGEABLE: "ACTA is a fluid document, in that unlike a law like SOPA or PIPA, it can be changed or altered at any time with little effort outside of convincing the member states to embrace the change." From a video at the bottom of this post you will find there are big secrets about ACTA that are not yet 'part of ACTA' but as soon as ACTA becomes enforced world wide they are free to add in these secret parts which are automatically enforceable and nothing you can do about it!

4: ABOVE THE LAW: ACTA gives the rights of Media Companies to and Copyright holders to view your information, your actions and to disconnect you from the internet without a court order. Once enforced it is untouchable via national laws and override them all.

5: ILLEGAL: "ACTA is Likely an Illegal Document"

""the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.""

6: BRIBERY: "cash payments for favourable rules" Media Companies are paying to have their own rules agreed to.

ANOTHER VERY IMPORTANT VIDEO: http://youtu.be/Dy3zBZ4vI4E

A VIDEO ALL ABOUT ACTA: http://youtu.be/N8Xg_C2YmG0

PEITION AGAINST ACTA: http://goo.gl/6GIkI (WORLDWIDE CAN SIGN)

1.2 Million Signatures Thank You!!!!

E-MAIL THE PEOPLE IN CHARGE OF VOTING WITH NO EFFORT: http://stop-acta-in.eu/ (EUROPEAN COUNTRIES ONLY)

FOLLOW THE LATEST WITH ANONYMOUS: https://twitter.com/#!/search/#Anonymous
[Off-topic] Erqe:
ACTA is something places around the world have been thinking up in secret for years to help stop free speech. Which we don't want. ACTA basicly gives our internet providers a ability to put someone in jail if they have copyrighted content. It also gives people to freedom to get a drug banned just because they don't like something﻿ in it, even if it can help save the lives of milions of people. ACTA is not a good thing.
[Off-topic] max_carpenter:
Thanks Erqe for your input and while I welcome all anti-ACTA comments you are slightly out with yours :-)

ISPS won't be sending anyone to jail but they will be required to notify copyright holders of infringments and could be forced to cut off your internet.

And as for drugs etc its only if they infring copyright of another company/product.

Also where as before it something being sold did not infringe copyright in the country it was made and not infringe in the country its being sold to it was perfectly legal to ship to that country for sale anyway you wanted. With ACTA if it passes through a country that it does infringe copyright (even if its not made or sold there just passing through in a shipment) that country is allowed to sieze it.

These last two points equal Less available products for people that need them (cheaper alternatives) and more expensive products and shipping costs internationally.

With the internet point of view not only are they going to kill the internet if it goes through as they are planning but it will also rise the cost of internet due to extra costs on the ISPs for monitoring. Plus impact on tramission speeds due to the opening of packets and inspecting. Single packets don't really matter but when you think of billions a second thats alot of processing time either equalling expensive hardware for ISPs or big delays in your data packets.
[Off-topic] Dirk:
Sorting ACTA fact from fallacy:

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2012/01/internet-awash-in-inaccurate-anti-acta-arguments.ars