yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Baguett:
Rooted yakjuxw with XXKL1 radio and 4.0.1, stock ROM:

AnTuTu - 6135

NenaMark1 - 49,7 fps

NenaMark2 - 24.6 fps
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] gizzlescretch:
benchmark

I'm running codenameandroid 1.1.4 from, APEX #3 kernel oced to 1.35. No uv
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] blackdub370:
Team kang milestone 3 + franco 15.2 1.35@

Antutu 7160

Enviado desde mi Galaxy Nexus usando Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] TwilightSparkle:
What app is that?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] blackdub370:
Quadrant advanced

Enviado desde mi Galaxy Nexus usando Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] AfroCreame:
NenaMark2: 31.3fps

Quadrand: 3100

Browsermark: 120817

An3DBenchXL: 38666

Rom: Open Kang M3

Kernal: Trinity 512MHz GPU (Experimental)

Overclocked 1.35MHz / Governor set to Performance during tests, but usually run conservative @ 1200

Hats off to ALL of the devs for all of their hard work!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] :
Hi,

Morfic's test kernel :D

Ondemand governor/Overvolt to 1300mV/1.53Ghz :D :

It's not just the score but more the cpu frequency :D

For now (and for my phone) it seems stable with the voltage at 1300mV (with the stock voltage infinite reboots),some benchs runs,no reboots,no lags...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] przemchess:
Can you tell me on which ROM you have achieved this score?

I've tried it on AOKP M3 and get much lower scores (around 5500)

PS. also phone was stable only with 1300mV/1.53Ghz voltage setting
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] :
Hi,

Same ROM,but with a custom kernel and it is especially the kernel who gives these results,with an original (stock) kernel it will be hard ... http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1455874...

But beware the kernel I'm using right now is a test kernel (available in the op of the thread).

Just for fun,a little better (same settings) :D :

Exept for "CPU integer"

Seems very stable for me,but i repeat for me also with 1.53Ghz/1300mV,all phones will support maybe or not these settings...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] przemchess:
I've tried those two:

TNP1536-RD-MVM512

TNP1536-ANY-MVM550-KSM

on AOKP but with sad scores (around 5500)

The best score I've got was on franco kernel 15.2
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] :
Re,

Yeah,something is wrong :eek:

Are you sure to have overclock at 1.53Ghz with an app like System Tuner or SetCpu?

Even at 1.19Ghz Antutu gives me about 6480...

And don't run 10 benchs following,overheating->thermal protection->lower scores.

Try reboot,let the phone runs cooler and try a bench...

Killed a few applications running in the background and not used (

just for the bench

)

Other than that I do not see :confused:

I use the same ROM and the same kernel...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] miketoasty:
Stock 4.0.4

Franco #16 Kernel

Frequency = 1.35GHz

Antutu: 5849

Quadrant: 2757
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] :
Re,

My last bench:

Not bad,not bad... :D

Morfic mades a really awesome kernel :eek:

:D
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] przemchess:
Ok I've found it it was init.d scripts blocking second core... after cleaning everything's is back to normal.

Score in Antutu 7124 :)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Seraphace:
Wow, fantastic scores. I'm having troubles with my OC. I've been using Glados 1.10, but I can't seem to get higher than 1.38. When I go to 120% (1.44) the phone seems to stay stuck at the lowest frequency. The max goes to 1.44, but it still stays on 420mhz in Setcpu.

Also, for overvolting, can someone tell me what some guidelines are? I can't find information ANYWHERE on it.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] :
Re,

Ah ok,it seems much better...But with what kernel/CPU frequency...?

I had not thought of an init.d script that could have been in conflict...And yet that I've already got :rolleyes:

But you have 7124,it's better than your previous score,but if it's with the Morfic's kernel test at 1.53Ghz...There is always something wrong :confused:

I hope it is with Franco's kernel/Morfic running at 1.35Ghz,in any case not at 1.53Ghz (with Morfic's kernel)...

I had almost similar scores (about 7080-7100) with Franco's kernel at 1.35Ghz (nightly#13.1) but with Morfic's kernel it's an another world (with CPU 1.53Ghz/GPU 512Mhz overclocks)...My phone is really fast and smooth,I've never seen it since Franco's kernel (and his work is great :) )

More screenshots of your benchs (with just ROM/Kernel settings) would welcome :)

---------- Post added at 12:54 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:47 AM ----------

Hi,

I'm sorry,just THE kernel i've not tested yet...It s this kernel :(

I'm not sure how his "live oc" works and maybe your phone can't handle cpu frq above 1.35/1.38Ghz?

I don't unterstand what happens with SetCpu,sorry :confused:

I just repeat my settings:

ROM:last AOKP (RomanB)

Kernel:TNP1536-RD-MVM512 (Morfic)

Other settings:actually overvolt to 1350mV (due to a little...crash,see morfic's thread).

For overvolt try apps like System Tuner or SetCpu (if the the kernel support it).

It should be noted that this is a kernel test...But to try...

Very stable (exept a crash for me :D),just a Nandroid backup and reflash the kernel test by increasing the voltage...I continue to test,all seems (yet) perfect :D

Good luck,try another kernel I'm not saying Glados kernel (or another kernel) is bad or worse than another,choose a kernel that suits you and that your phone supports compared to overclock :)

Here it's a benchmark thread,I participate and I like but this is not an end...

If your phone runs great with your actual kernel/settings keep it! :cool:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] :
Hi,

Same settings like above:

Run at 1.19Ghz:

Run at 1.53ghz:

:D
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Baguett:
Running AOKP build 22 4.0.3 with flux 123 kernel, benchmark taken with performance governor (1350mhz max, 350min). Got higher score with stock kernel, weird. With francos kernel i got 4000...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] :
Re,

I think some have a problem with your benchs :confused:

Strange to have such low scores :eek:,something is wrong,it (maybe) explain above.Some reasons for low scores were explained...

With Franco kernel nightly#13.1 at 1.35Ghz (conservative governor) Antutu gives me about 7080 (sometimes a little more,about 7100) look at the posts before,which could explain the lower scores at 1.35Ghz...

My last two benchs (with tweaking Ondemand governor for up_treshold and sampling_rate :D ),I managed to go above 7700 :D,hard!:

First run:

Second run after a few minutes in deep sleep (important,CPU runs cooler for each benchs):

:D
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Baguett:
Can yuo explain what init.d scripts is and how i can make it activate both cores? :) i hav the same problem as you.

Got 6000 after i installed system cpu, but i am not sure if it was making the difference, or if the phone just was restared.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] SRD720:
Hi

Which kernel do you use to overclock to 1.53 GHz?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] :
Hi,

It's just on the previous page...:

Kernel:TNP1536-RD-MVM512 (Morfic):http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1455874

:)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] :
Hi,

A verry little more :D:

Here it becomes hard to go beyond these scores, for me...

Same settings/ROM/Kernel.

Maybe tweaking a little more the governor (Ondemand for me),it will take for me to try again :D.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] :
Hi,

Bump!

It's quite here...:D

Since Fransisco Franco release his kernel with a 1.5Ghz freq...Some benchs could be posted,Antutu (more accurate),CfBench,or the new Quadrant for example,etc...

Just specify the rom/kernel/settings (freqs,governors,tweaks) used...

It seems that the OP has abandoned the topic,this topic is for the benchs in general ...

To change,bench at almost stock cpu freq... :D .

Rom:AOKP

Kernel:Morfic TNP1536-RD-MVM512

Others:Ondemand governor/Running at 1.19Ghz/Tweaked governor (see above):

Antutu gives about 6100 for stock kernel...and there it's at 1.19Ghz :D
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] MS.:
Tonight i tried few ROMs and AOKP M3 seems to be fastest one. Kernel - franco #17 @1,5GHz.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] dumbdroid:
franco's+AOKP

No GPU overclock...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Baguett:
what the heck, i also has AOKP b23 and franco's 17.2, but i got 1200 in quadrant and 2200 in antutu, wtf? i never get good scores, no matter which kernel i use :3
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Dakota0206:
Have you updated quadrant to the multi core support? What do you have running? What governor are you using and at what clock speed?

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Nexus - Verizon 4G LTE.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ChronoReverse:
Has anyone tested the new Quadrant using stock speeds (1.2GHz)?

I'd like to see the screenshot of the score breakdown.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] sblantipodi:
is there some bench at 1.65GHz?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Baguett:
Sorry for slow reply.

I had the latest update at that time, i was uding the performance governor and highest clock speed (which was 1.35GHz i think, maybe even 1.5)

I dont get it, i also get bad scores with a different kernel. and i have been trying with like 4-5 different build of AOKP.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] mrnovanova:
SD card read and write

How do you get such fast sd card read and write scores I've seen I've seen some >50 card read I get 18.7 on antutu , and my sd card write is 8.8.

I'm on AOKP 27 with franco kernel 18.6

Also my ram score is 968 I've seen a lot of scores over 1200 how come?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] mstrmnd:
I'm running AOKP M4 and Franco M2. With CPU at 1.35 and the governor to ondemand, I get between 5000 and 5500 on Antutu.

The Ram, CPU integer/float-point are much lower than everyone's figures. Is this a problem with the app or phone?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] baadaq:
rom: bugless beats

kernel: trinity

quadrant:3221

antutu: 6244
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] MagicMan3:
I just got 6299

Rom: Slim Rom 2.9

Kernel: PopcornKernel 8.3

OC/UV: None unless they are defaulted in the Kernel.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] junha.lee.32:
my galaxy nexus score...

hi, i'm junha.lee.32..

Today I clocked the benchmark.

my phone put it in the freezer. ;)

at the time, my Galaxy Nexus temperature of 11 degrees. ;)

my rom : AOKP Build 32

Kernel : GLaDOS V1.29

Voltage of the primary.

MPU OC : 115%

Core OC : 115%

Gpu : 512Mhz.

Governor : Conservative & Noop.

Temperature limit : 64 drgress.

Yeah~
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] :
Hi,

Yep!Very good score ;)

But with your detail...

Governor:uses Wheatley (or Ondemand)

I/O:uses sio

Temp limit:increases to 74°C for example (or a little higer but at your own risk)

Min CPU frequency:? uses the second slot relative to your Live OC

Conservative governor for a bench...Not verry good...

At this CPU frequency what is your voltage?

Thank you for bumping this thread it's fun :D

I posted my benchs a few pages ago but with more "standard" frequencies,I going to have to put myself in high CPU frequency :D

:)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] subvertz:
AOKP b30 faux, OC'ed to1480Mhz

CF 11636, 3375,6679

Antutu 6473
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] rusty815:
ROM: javroch's 4.0.4 aosp build 5

Kernel: lean kernel 3.2.2exp4

CPU: 1.65GHz

GPU: 384MHz

Quadrant: 3419

Antutu: 6371
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] natious:
You guys are getting great results.

I only got my nexus today im on:

akop32 + franco 140

i get 6000-6200 :/

Almost the same as stock, so i dont know whats going on :(
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] :
Re,

Guys,something is wrong with your results...When I see your CPU freq and your (low) scores...:confused:

Look a few pages back for some others great scores but with different kernel...

Maybe thermal throttling (overheating),bad choice of governor or something else?

Some olds benchs without reboot,1.42Ghz/CPU Temp Limit set to 80°C (if I remember)/Ondemand governor/LiquidSmooth rom/Glados kernel:

Same config,but at 1.49Ghz:

I can still test with these frequencies,I have always about 7100/7200 at 1.42Ghz and about 7400 at 1.49Ghz with Antutu...

I also tested at 1.63Ghz and Antutu give me,at best,about 7600

Depend of with or without reboot,first or second run,CPU temp,CPU settings,etc...

Will test with higher frequencies :D
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] rusty815:
Fsync might have something to do with it, lean kernel had it enabled, but I know most other kernels have it disabled or have the option to disable it, my io scores aren't as high as I've seen on other kernels, but there is no difference between having it enabled or disabled other than on benchmarks, disabling Fsync also causes data corruption if there is an error of some sort.

I also have the throttling temp lower than stock, I like my phone cool and it helps with battery life.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] yungboss22:
Leankernel

Governor : HotplugX

CPU : 230mhz - 1650mhz

GPU : 512mhz
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] six_dfx:
ROM: stock IMM76I

Kernel: franco r141

CPU: 1344 MHz

GPU: 512 MHz

quadrant: 3448

antutu: 7000
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] leelaa:
Liquid 1.3

Franco 142

Max 1344

Min 384
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] FC1032:
1) AOKP build 32, Franco nightlies 512 GPU

2) Quadrant - 3648

Antutu - 6013

Nenamark - 31.9 Fps (highest 33, apex 512GPU, 1.5Ghz CPU)

3) 700mhz - 1.3ghz, 512 GPU.

Ondemand, UV done by smartreflex
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] aasheet:
guys , im getting pretty crappy read/write scores in antutu

using aokp b32 and francos kernel [no oc /uv ]

are u guys doing something extra ?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] sert00:
rom--blackice

kernel--glados

antutu benchmarch app

test1--8098

test2--8079

test3--8007

benchmark&tuning app

test1--25568

test2--26961

test3--25998

all these tests made with 384 mhz cpu,liveoc with min 840\860 and max from 1920 to 2000 mhz...depending on when reboot...many factors influences that,like termal trottling\overheating,tasks,gpu acceleration etc.tests made with gpu acceleration off,raised a bit high freq. voltages (highest 3 freq. slot with 1390,1395 and 1400 mv)after creating and putting in system\etc\init.d a script that disables smartreflex and reboot after every test with 5\6 min of deepsleep to wait the cpu to minimize cpu temp..without that script,,i can't go higher than 1400 mhz with glados (selecting max 1400 mhz reboot the phone..now instead not with the script.)

definitely the most powerfull and higher scores i ever had on this phone(also because i haven't an elite chip...it doesn't support well 512 gpu and reboot over 1450 mhz with SR enabled.)

:cool:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Coflropter:
Antutu

Quadrant

Using AOKP w/ James Bond kernal.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] :
Hi,

LiquidSmooth rom/Last Glados kernel/app/Ondemand governor/350Mhz-1.6Ghz/512Mhz GPU/CPU temp limit set to 75°C/No Undervolt/No Live Overclock/No Core Overclock/All the rest is stock settings.

Without reboot:

:)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] uoY_redruM:
Racream with a31 Trinity kernel (1536/1536 512 GPU ONDEMAND)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] jimmyhook:
Liquid ROM 1.35, Franco kernel m3 384/1344 mhz ondemand gov, no UV.

Over 3300 in quadrant isn't too shabby
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] adrynalyne:
It is when you consider that it was all i/o that went into that score. Take a look at the Galaxy Nexus score in that screencap. What would make a real difference in performance, cpu, is almost identical.

i/o doesn't increase performance as much as it cheats benchmarks. That is why so many of these uber scores we see do not translate into performance gains. It is fun to benchmark, but rarely useful. You have a decent gain in GPU, which would point towards a GPU overclock. I am on the fence on how useful that is outside of games.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] dreamsforgotten:
Running my beta if pool party, Franco kernel at 1228mhz interactive governor.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] :
Re,

Same settings like my above post,except the CPU freq,here at 1.63Ghz with Smartreflex disabled->1390mV:

:)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] crimson12:
Anyone else getting low scores with the cm9 nightlies?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ÜBER™:
1.48mhz. Samurai kernel cm9 latest nightly.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] digweed4me:
Aokp 35 with Franco nightly r999
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] adrynalyne:
Are we going to see any benchmarks with substantially different cpu scores than stock? Or are we doomed to see all these benches exploiting I/O to get their scores?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] stratoox:
no one use slim rom? i dont know what kernel use for this rom
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ÜBER™:
... unfortunately that seems to be the case with most phones. I haven't seen any phone actually improve over stock performance overclocked. There is a slight improvement but not too much.

Not to brag but mine didn't use io to exploit the score I'd like you to compare my 3000 io to the guy with the Franco kernel he has 6000 io thus why his is "higher"
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] thos25:
Nothing special., stock 4.0.4

Not rooted.

I've never been to impressed with the benches on this phone. Apparently they are good compared to a lot of others with the nexus, but they are nothing spectacular. My Evo 3D crushed these benches I'm seeing here. With exception of cf. Cf scores on nexus are pretty high from what I'm seeing. Quadrants on this thing are a joke though. Maybe because of the screen resolution, I don't know. I used to get 4500+ quads with E3D rooted and 2700 stock. Get 2000 on gnex.

But I like this phone better. Nicer screen. Vanilla. Ics. Slimmer. Curved glass screen is nice. Haven't even rooted because haven't felt the need to.

So, while I'm a self avowed benchmark junkie I have gotten over the fact that this phone just won't give those insane scores.

Also, note on my scores. These were run one after the other. Nothing was killed in background. And had probably at least two things running that didn't have to be. So, respectable, but nothing to write home about.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] uoY_redruM:
I'm not sure what io means, so I don't think I'm exploiting it lol.

I'm pretty happy with my results, benchmark wise, as well as my everyday use performance.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ÜBER™:
Input/output its how the OS handles data.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] dreamsforgotten:
There really isn't anything TO be impressed with regarding phone bench marks. They are usually partial to one processor or another and def don't define the phones performance as they do with desktop hardware. Instead of striving for your phone to nail that magic "insane"number, what would benefit users most is consistently hitting nearly the same score each time that way you would at the last have a testament to the phones stability.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ianken:
Tell that to someone who upgraded from a spinning disk to ssd.

I get what you mean, but the gnex, while being technically slower than my sensation that it replaced, is in reality far more responsive, partially due to better storage performance.

But I did lol when I saw the first quadrant scores after flashing new bits. ;-)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ÜBER™:
Exactly benchmarks mean nothing in real world performance if your phone is butter smooth who cares what you score.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] :
Hi,

Here:http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=26078927&postcount=84 we can see that the scores for some CPU calculation are higher than stock,no???

Look at the score for CPU integer/float point,you do not have these scores there on stock,same thing for Cf-bench...

I personally do not use Quadrant,in fact the total score take a shoot with a high i/o score...In my opinion Cf-Bench and Antutu are the most reliable...

And here it's a thread for benchs,not for know if a higher score do a smoother/faster phone or if a high overclock have an impact on battery life...

It's just for fun,for play...

You see the difference in stock vs overclock and not only in i/o score,no???:

I'm laughing when I see someone post a score,bad it must be said saw the CPU freq,then there is higher score with a lower CPU freq from someone else or a comment and then the guy says "the benchs means nothing,it is useless,etc..."Ahahah!!!:D:D:D

If you take this thread too seriously...And if you don't like benchs,think it's useless,means nothing,etc...then don't read it and don't post in it...

Let us play with our scores which mean nothing :D,one has the right to have a little fun:D

And it changes a little about threads for what is the best ROM,help me to choose a ROM,etc...:D

:)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] CrashV5:
Benchmark can drive people crazy... last week i did some test with my stock nexus to try 2 or 3 kernel, then i try some overclock with one of them... results in quadrand drop to 1400 when i push the frequency to 1300 ... so i think "what????" ....restore all to standard, but quadrant again on 1500 point (before i got over 2000, the standard stock rom result) ...the phone was smooth and fast, but that strange low quandrant results (and also antutu) make me sick...so i restored a nandroid e live more happy but.... the phone worked very well also when quadrant said 1400 point...

so.... better forget the benchmark!!! :-)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] simms22:
Trinity a42b kernel with the RasCream rom benchmarks, 1689/1689 ondemand/deadline, default voltage.

thanks uoY_redruM for the idea(btw, i couldnt type out your nick :confused:)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] :
Hi,

Nice scores here :)

Over 8000 in Antutu at 1.68Ghz...Awesome!

Last mine with LiquidSmooth ROM/Glados kernel 1.33/Interactive governor/Smartreflex Off/381Mhz-1.72Ghz/1420mV for 1.72Ghz/CPU Temp Limit set to 85°C/Without reboot:

I should retest with Ondemand...

I ran the CF-Bench test almost immediately after Antutu,Cf-Bench took me 3% of battery life in one run :D
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] simms22:
more.. trinity a42b 1.689ghz kernel and the rascream rom..
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] sarni84:
Trinity kernel 1689/1689 performance on eagles blood :p
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] simms22:
rascream and trinity alpha52 @1689/1689 ondemand
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] iGoogleNexus:
=\ my bleh scores

- Google
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] simms22:
what cpu speed?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] iGoogleNexus:
1344 Max

700 min... lol

I should push the min xD

- Google
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] simms22:
well thats not meh for 1344 :)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ÜBER™:
Nothing but I/o look at mine.

Less io pure CPU.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] simms22:
nice cpu score!

generally, our memory scores suck. but i have a feeling that there is something "broken" that can be fixed :)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ÜBER™:
Hmm I was wondering, what the heck the evo lte is getting 7000+ in memory and that's with sense aka the memory hog. I'm very curious as to why our memory is scoring so low...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] fishhelmet:
Running the aosp cm9 kang with lean kernel nightly.

Benchmarks are quadrant and linpack
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] beaumontcali48:
Running at 1480 on performance.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] :
Bump!:D

Kernel:http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1708982

Ondemand governor/1.53Ghz/LiquidSmooth-Linaro-1.5b3.

And yes Quadrant is not very reliable for the overall score (due to the high I/O score) but Cf-Bench...not bad and more reliable,no cheat with the I/O.

Indeed in this topic it's the first time I post a Quadrant score :D
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] simms22:
some random scores at 1689 and 1728mhz with the trinity kernel and rascream.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] manore:
My normal setup score is about the same always 6300-6600 in Antutu.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] JuLes' MostWanted:
Eat this quadcore htc x lol.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] x4sper:
Nice what rom/kernel setup?

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Xparent Cyan Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] leelaa:
Rascream & trinity 1689
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] x4sper:
wow thats insane im try it out thank you
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] adrynalyne:
One X pwns you where it counts (CPU, Memory and GPU). You know, the stuff where it actually makes a difference ;)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] SocialReject:
Who's side are you on?

Traitor.

Sent from the future.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] adrynalyne:
I am a double agent :D
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ÜBER™:
Nah maybe a vigilante of truth.

Sent From My Sprint Galaxy Nexus
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Soutaiseiriron:
The Dark Knight?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] simms22:
or fun killer :eek:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] SocialReject:
You ruined it.

Sent from the future.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] JuLes' MostWanted:
I speak for the dual cores....

Not bad for a double core doe.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] rbeave70:
1.4 Paranoid Android running Franco at 1.5 and performance