yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] mike infinity:
My router is a dlink DIR-825...I'm not sure if that matters. You could also try re-orienting the router antenna. 13/4 isn't horrible but you should be getting better.

I have run several other speed tests since. The results are consistent with my OP. Anywhere up to ~20ft from my router gives 20-25Mbps DL and 0.5Mbps upload on my 30/0.5 line with the prime.

I get 4-6/0.5 at the farthest reaches of the house (up to 60ft away on another floor)

I even tried it outside in my car ~70 feet away with the doors closed and scored a respectable 1.2Mbps/0.5Mbps. I am very happy.

My laptop scores 25/0.5 close and 10/0.5 long at 60ft in another room. The TF101 takes the cake though at long range scoring from 16-20/0.5 at 60ft and seems to have an excellent antenna.

Next I am going to try attaching a larger antenna (if I can find it) to the router and re-testing at long range. I will post the result here.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] mike infinity:
Tomorrow I will have a chance to bring my prime to work and speedtest on the network there which has much higher possible Download/Upload values (depending on the traffic). I will compare it with my laptop as a reference.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] mike infinity:
Just tested my wifi at work.

laptop: 13.85/12.86 (DL/UPL)

Prime: 9.9/13.5

Notes: I suspect the differences are bandwidth related from our work network which varies significantly with usage rather than any differences in performance when you think about these numbers.

Conclusion: I am getting similar performance from the prime as my toshiba laptop at work. I am not sure where the routers are...they are hidden behind the ceiling tiles.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] mike infinity:
I just completed a second test at lunch break where the bandwidth should be higher.

Laptop: 10.98/11.07 (DL/UPL)

Prime: 12.9/14.416

These tests were done within a minute of each other and from the same location.

As I said earlier, the differences are likely on the network side and I am getting pretty much par performance from the wifi.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] Lite matter:
I'll have to return mine for another.

30ft 2 walls

Prime 3.5 dl 4.2 ul

Ipad2 23.6 dl 7.1 ul

Did numerous tests and that's where I use the tablet the most. :mad:
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] nyijedi:
How are your Prime's speeds when close to the router? Do you get 15-20 Mbps? If so, I doubt you have a defective Prime. I've done extensive testing with my Prime's wifi on a number of networks, and have come to realize that the Prime's WiFi is fast w/ a strong signal, but can go down to 3-8 Mbps when at a distance, while my iPad maintains a connection at about 16-20 Mbps. Also, interference seems to play a big issue. That is, the Prime seems to take a decent speed drop if there are a few wireless networks w/in range - more so than other devices.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] CGCampbell:
well i did some test with my tfp vs my laptop 5 feet i got 22mbps down and 8mbps up on both laptop and tfp

at 30 feet out side with a wall my laptop was 13mbps and 3.6mbps while the tfp was 18mbps and 4mbps

havnet had any issue with the tfp wifi yet
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] Lite matter:
It does fine in the room with the router 20-22 dl and around 6.4 ul. Once you get to that 25 -30ft it plummets. My nook tablet averages 19 dl at the same 30 ft. So you think this is a defective prime or just something they all have due to the back panel? Id understand if it was happening to everyone but from what others have said they have primes that are hitting 20 dl at 30 ft and everythings fine. :confused:
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] The_FNG:
I have a WNDAP360 WAP installed in the attic, so we only have to go through 1 layer of sheetrock.

The TF101 - Over 29Mbps

The TF201 - Over 19Mbps

This is precisely why I'm returning my TF201 until such time they can make it AT LEAST match the perf of the TF101
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] Lite matter:
Tested it yesterday and this morning and wouldn't get passed 3.5 dl. Now in the same spot it seems to be all over the place. Anywhere from 11 - 19 dl. Seems to be hitting 17 the most though which i can live with. I'll make sure to do more tests over a longer period of time before posting next time.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] nyijedi:
I suffer from the exact same thing. I'm pretty sure this is how all Primes are, and the people that are hitting 20 Mbps at 30 ft either:

1) Don't have many thick walls or obstructions in the way,

2) Don't have any other wireless networks interfering, or

3) Don't know how far 30 feet really is.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] mike infinity:
I don't have other wireless networks in our area (save the neighbour's over 100 feet from our outside wall). I actually measured off the distances in my OP. Not sure that it would make much difference since it should affect the devices performance equally.

As for the walls, I have 2x4 sheetrock walls. My 30 foot test has two of them plus a bookshelf in between.

The 30 feet is actually 28 feet measured. The OP tests have been repeated with similar results. For some reason the ipad1 gets a slightly better result in that location only.

16Mbps for the prime at that distance compared to the 20 for the TF101 is not too shabby....especially when you consider that the TF101 really set the bar in all of my tests.

I won't be returning my prime anymore than I would be returning my laptop or Ipad 1 for not scoring as high on a wifi shootout as the TF101.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] mike infinity:
I posted this elsewhere, but the data belongs here:

A WIFI+BT test:

Setup:

I paired the prime with a motorola BT audio streamer that I use to stream from portable devices to a stereo system. I watched ~20 minutes of HD streaming from youtube and netflix. Then I ran a speed test with and without BT and compared with TF101 and IPAD1 at the same location.

results:

1. The first time I played back a youtube video it stopped and started. I thought I had a problem. Then I tried two other files from youtube (both 1080p HD) that streamed flawlessly (~5 minutes a piece)...with the audio output to stereo over BT. Then I let it stream 10 minutes of netflix HD with audio to BT as before. All of it flawless at ~20 feet from router in the same room

2. Speedtests: (DL posted only..UPL is always ~0.5Mbps with my ISP)

TF101: 23.4 Mbps

IPAD 1: 19 Mbps

TF201 +BT: 18.4Mbps

TF201 BT OFF: 17.4Mbps
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] mike infinity:
Update

I have found that setting my wifi to ch5 produces the optimal range...though this could be a function of my environment. It actually improved for just about all my devices.

I Aldo tried 'g mode only'...this neither improved nor weakened my wifi test results.

I tried bt audio and streaming video for 30 minutes without issue. I did notice that bt audio plus wifi with splashtop video streaming produces out of sync audio on my tf101, tf201 and ipad1...seems like a splashtop issue.

On another note the prime produced a wifi free GPS lock in 30 seconds inside my house today. Its my first GPS test post update to ics
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] Torres 9:
Hi

I have a Xperia X10 Mini

Now I use the cyanogen ROM

My phone without a SIM card is working fine & properly

But when I use sim cart my phone is Reset & reset & again !!!

please Help Me

Thanks
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] zatloide:
Anyone have installed whatsapp on your x10 mini? because i don't know how find that

sorry for my english
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] RyanVIII:
I hv the link where you can dwonload it...just pm me
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] zatloide:
Sorry i don't understand
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] Felimenta97:
Send a PM him, and he will send you a link where you can download Whatsapp
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] zatloide:
thN YOU BUT THI APP DONT WORK ON MY X10 MINI WITH NAA KERNEL 08 And gingerbread 21b
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] RyanVIII:
did u get anything error when you installing it?
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] zatloide:
application not installed

this is the terminal script, i use astro but nothing to do

thank you friend to try help me
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] marcell39:
update your market if you want whatsapp
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] zatloide:
i have the last 3.4.4 market version but whatsapp it wasn't:confused:
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] rooterdam:
This is a known bug with the latest version.

You should know this if you had read the thread..
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] aisuj52:
I have nAa kernel v8 too and whatsapp works fine for me..
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] zatloide:
thank you and sorry
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] zatloide:
which kind of rom do u use because i use gingerbread 21b maybe u use cyanogenmod??
[General Questions and Answers] Noburusan:
I rooted my Nook tablet per Indirect's guide and everything seemed to work flawlessly. I have the android market, and installed the Amazon market and messed around with things briefly before bed. Today various apps like busybox and and titanium backup are telling me they need root. Superuser is installed and my various markets still work fine.

I read Indirect's ENTIRE THREAD tonight at work and the only thing I could think maybe happened is similar to this recent post.

Im pretty much an android noob. My Nook Tablet shows version 9.9.9 Is there some way to verify I didnt update to 1.4.1 and break root while I was in the process of doing it or am I completely over looking something? I figured I would check here before trying to downgrade and reroot the Nook Tablet.

Hope I didnt leave anything out.
[General Questions and Answers] Noburusan:
After some discussion on IRC and trying to su from terminal it appears that my Nook Tablet did update to 1.4.1 while I was rooting it.
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] sekhargreen:
For downloads follow 2nd post.

Sekhy's ROM Features:

Based on Cyanogenmod 7 ported by Marcellusbe

Sekhy's ROM v7.0 Razr Edition CM7 A big thanks to Marcellusbe for bringing CM7 to G3

(Please let me know the Feature Requests)

v7.0 Sekhy's ROM Razr Edition v7.0 Gingerbread 2.3.7

//Download//

(Note: Being a separate thread started for Gingerbread please treat v7.0 as v1.0)

-Android 2.3.7 Cyanogenmod 7.1.0

-Better audio quality

-Better battery life

-Deodexed

-Facebook Messenger

-Faster boot/shutdown

-Fast multitasking

-Faster screen rotation

-Fast taskbar

-Faster wake/sleep

-Google market 3.4.4

-ICS Boot Animation (New)

-ICS Clock Widget

-ICS Sounds, Ringtones with 2dB boost (New)

-LauncherPro

-Livewallpapers

-More free ram (Thanks to Juwe ramscript)

-Optimized response/scrolling

-Quickpic

-Superuser updated 3.0.7

-Themes

Androidian

Cyanbread

NTSense-Blue

System Default

Touchwizzed

-Unit Convertor

-Youtube
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] sekhargreen:
:: Reserved for later ::
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] sekhargreen:
:: Reserved for credits ::
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] austin266:
hey sekhar

how did u make the razr so much fast than others

nice work

but need some more......(not discouraging)..i know ur ability

good job mate
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] sekhargreen:
Thanks for your appreciation. But being an Alpha build by Marcellusbe, I cannot do much more than this. Hopefully in the future you will get what you want!
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] appajodu:
Yeppi :D Downloading it now....

very eager to test it after reading your change log sekhar ;) will update to ASAP

friends.....download it and give your comments....:cool:
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] Rickmnnu:
Nice Job...:cool:
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] austin266:
hi sekhar

previously with cm7 alpha 7..i used themes like lunar ui., ntsense green .,ics sandwich theme...everything is fine

but after flashing ur rom., while using these themes ., theme status bar is messing up with battery icons and date and time .... looking clumpsy

can u help me out
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] PersianSphinx:
i want screen shots please. from theme, ie the main launcher, the notification dropped and showing some lock screens. some quadrant scrn shots would be totally cool too :)
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] sekhargreen:
The reason for no screenshots is I am not using it, Razr Edition and focused on v8.0 only.
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] xadidas:
so here is the newest Sheky's rom version?
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] sekhargreen:
This is not actually the latest. But Gingerbread.

For froyo I have v8.7 right now and v9.x is in the works with MIUI mix.
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] austin266:
hi mate

u r keeping names to ur new versions...making me tempt to give a try aleast one time each rom

cheers for ur new work (miui mix)
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] shogun82:
Hy,

A very good ROM, my wife uses this on she's phone.

Keep it up.
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] sekhargreen:
Thanks for the feedback. Watch out my v10 (Froyo) is coming.
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] bsuhas:
Sekhar, can we have system.img for version 9 (and 10 as well)???

---------- Post added at 10:56 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:53 AM ----------

Sorry wrong place for this question. I will post same on the Froyo thread.
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] sajjt:
Shekhar,

Nice attempt, nice presentation and layouts too but to be honest, its too laggy, I've tried the V9.1 & 9.2 also both are too slow, is there anything I've to taken care of?
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] headers.chennai:
This ROM is wonderful. Battery dropped only 8% during sleep hours.

Will update after usage!
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] sekhargreen:
This is Gingerbread. and 9.x were Froyo.
[Galaxy 3 Android Development] xadidas:
how to delete avast and battery xl?
[Click General] :
I want to flash the Froyo AOSP for Tattoo v0.50 ROM,I had prepared my work but I fogot the version of the Recovery.I had flash recovery long long ago~

and how to get the version of the Recovery
[Click General] KingCreole:
Switch off your phone, and start it on recovery pushing Home+Call+Power at the same time. When recovery starts, the version number is on the top.

Sorry for my english.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ynk1121:
I got my galaxy nexus this morning and I have to say, this screen is awful. I'm not sure if it's defective or they are all like this. Everything was fine until I turned the brightness down. I loaded google.com up and the white on the page looked like it had colored dots in it. It's not white at all. After looking at it for a while, it appears to be some type of image retention? Do these type of screens get burn in? When I flip to landscape the area where the 3 bottom buttons are is worse in discoloration and I can make out the button images. It's not too bad but this thing was $700 and plus it's only 12 hours old... I don't know if I should return it? :(
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Lcrkz0023:
Spray neutrogena sunblock on the screen...make sure its spf 100+!! No more burn! Oh wait!...:p
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] BlazinGTI:
Seriously, you may just have to exchange it.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Dirk:
Other people have reported image retention too. It's 'normal', unfortunately.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] jan-willem3:
I got it to my plan is to just wait a few months/weeks and wait until batches with perfect screens will ship then I will return my phone. So I get hopefully one with perfect screen. Trying to get one with a good screen now looks like playing russian roulette.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] KULASSE:
Hello,

My screen yelleow tinte
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Cmmts:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1391509&page=12

You might want to take a look at that thread. It probably is not burn in, but perhaps color tint and banding. (At low brightness, the whites will seem grey and have a sort of linen look to them. Many screens have also red/green discoloration.)

Here are samples about the screen issues:

https://dl.dropbox.com/0/view/pd5u8d...-47-17_435.jpg

http://img710.imageshack.us/img710/3687/gndisplay.jpg

http://aijaa.com/000229287969

Long story short, get it exchanged - however, there is a high likelihood that the new unit will suffer from the same issues.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] trueagle:
I exchanged mine and this one doesn't have blue streaks vertical lines or dots.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Raibyn:
If you see vertical streaks in it, exchange it. My first GNex had some very noticeable streaks but my second one is fine. The 'linen' look on light backgrounds when the screen is very dim is going to be on all of them from what I can tell. That seems to be a quality of the SAMOLED screen used on the GNex. If it is uniform, then it's it no big deal and 'normal'. You should not have to put up with the vertical streaks, though.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] rayiskon:
Hey guys, so i've talked with Zackconsole , he is porting ICS to Huawei Ideos U1850 , it's in Beta 3 now and he's done a great job especially taking into consideration the hardware he's dealing with. Anyways , he doesn't own a I9001, but he said that he is ready to port for us if we're ready to test his builds, basically he needs one private tester, and the rest can test when builds get published, normally i would've volunteered to test, but i have 2 serious exams coming in February (i'm a med student) and will be absent from the forums for a while , so we're looking for someone who has the time to keep testing and communicating with the dev, logcatting and reporting errors, so if anyone is interested plz let me know. it won't be easy, but if sakindia managed to get Cranium to where it is now without having the device, this project might succeed, in addition as seen in his signature Zackconsole owns an Arc S , which should make it even easier to use their bases...

Update: OK , so from now on FaqihCici will be working with Zackconsole , any questions/info should be addressed to him.

for the following few days i'm still free and ready to help in any way if needed. i hope more and more people will join too. Gd. Luck guys ;)

Note: i kindly ask the mods not to move/delete this thread only for a couple of days untill we see how many users are ready for testing.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] broodplank1337:
wow! Awesome news
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] pyronia:
+1 here..........
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] sag.:
+1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] rayiskon:
Update: Zackconsole: Well i might be able to push a POC by today cause i am free today..but need a tester...or u can find someone to test it... cause rarely i get to have free time as well

i would prefer if the person who will work with him start since the first build, but if we don't find any, i'll keep testing for the time i could be online and someone will have to take over. let me know if some1 is interested to start the work from today.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] FaqihCici:
PM me.. i would like to be his tester..

but he need to clear my head on how's to

but i think it would be easy because he's malaysian.. :D

edit : how he going to do the ics porting? .. afaik .. we need cynogenmod working rom to start the porting of ics..
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] rayiskon:
great stuff ! :cool:
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] TheMrCaveman:
Firts of all thnx for thinking about the I9001 owners.

And i am home almost all so if testers are needed just give ma a sign;)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] djdana:
+1 wil test the build in the future

Really great news
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] xci:
awesome news!

hoping to see a thread from him soon about the progress he makes :D

Edit: So far, YardE and frostibe88 are working individually on their own port aswell. Wouldn't it be better if they all team up?

just a suggestion.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Naruto98:
+1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] TheMrCaveman:
Bundle the power

Just my idea too when i thought about it.;)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] GuestK00250:
could be a good idea.. or not. if they were to team up im sure the developement would be faster and easier. then again when two strangers team up might cause conflict.. maybe for now, it is best each one make their own
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] rayiskon:
I think it's better if Zackconsole starts the port and at least we get a booting version first, since he knows from where to start thanks to his ICS ports for other devices, then the whole community including guys like manveru0, YardE, skywalker01 and others could join forces and fix what can be fixed to get to where SGS is now :) so, definitely our priority is to get a booting version, hopefully with working touchscreen, other hardware stuff and tweaks will follow on.

Edit: annoymous1234 u're also Malaysian, so maybe u could help FaqihCici in case he needs it :)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] chasemyass:
+1 ;)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] kamran k:
hi.

good news.

thx.:):):)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] avq:
praise the devs :D
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] sag.:
PMme i want to be a volunteer..
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Klarostorix:
Hail to the (ICS-)king, baby xD

Tapatalked from my Samsung Galaxy S Plus
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] hidberan:
Very good news
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] wastemantej:
Keep up the good work

(I am noob so i may not be of any help except for encouraging):o
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] razq3k:
Like it so much. Hope we got working ICS for our i9001 now!
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] FaqihCici:
still in progress ... :D
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] kellermanv:
Go go go go! thx guys! :D
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] annqx:
How is it possible ? How can someone port ICS to I9001 if he doesnt even own the phone? Even when he has someone else who can test a few times.

When I am programming (even simple applications) I have to test every small step. I cant imagine porting something, when I dont have the ability to try it out

Can someone give me some insight?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] AssassinSvK:
thats a good point bro, i am interesting too about it :)

but anyway keep working guys
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] mr_omega:
Ask sakindia123 - he don't have SGS+ too and... we're using Cranium isn't it?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Mikolak28:
It's not that surprising, really. Look at Cranium, the dev doesn't have the phone, yet he's succeeded at making a fully functional ROM.

If you know about the hardware, have the right repositories etc., you're all set.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Jaafar U.K.:
waww !!Yesterday i bought after the galaxy S (MIUI rom -android 4.0.1) the GALAXY S I9001 PLUS

But when i came home i saw while doing a quick google search no ICS rom even not a MIUI-rom?! i was suprised and than in doubt to keep the SGS or not...but yes!!! 2day after checking this thread i'll keep the galaxy + !!

Looking forward to an ICS rom on the GS+ !!!
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] K_Peculier:
Don't get your hopes up. This is not the first thread with ICS-claims :rolleyes:
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] kellermanv:
Well, these guys are our only hope since cyanogen devs won't even look at us, galaxy s devs are also avoiding us. So let's hope you will sort it out. Wish you luck!
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] kad3t:
Sad but true.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Pinx0:
It would be nice but one thing is making a ROM and another one very different is porting ICS...

If it's possible, which I doubt, doing it only one person that, if it wasn't enough already, hasn't even own the phone seems almost imposible. And what about drivers and all that stuff? I've seen lots of devices that cant be upgraded becuase the manufacturer doesnt release new drivers.

Nah... I wish it'd come true but... no hopes.