yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] xriderx66:
This will be the LAST time I answer this question for this thread.

This is NOT for JUST the Vibrant.

If you took the time to CLICK the petition you would find out this is for ALL CAPABLE GALAXY S VARIANTS. Which involves your device. Please read more thoroughly and read the thread that is central to this for more information.

If you sign, not only do you give all of our devices a chance to get ICS, but just the fact that you NOT signing will bring nothing good, and everything bad.

-@airfluip, sorry for my pissy mood, i've answered that question atleast 8 times in the fascinate forum and just came here to read that. Nothing against you. I just don't want to answer the exact question 8 times here either.

Every sign counts.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] Fluidification:
Galaxy S 4G ICS Petition

Edited. Removed
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] N00B_IN_N33D:
The first paragraph of the petition:
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] Fluidification:
I realize, but I signed it. So have fun.

---------- Post added at 04:44 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:43 AM ----------

Also. @Vibrant owners. Sorry about the 911/e911 thing. It really sucks to be ripped out of a rom. We are trying to get there.(CM7)
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] xriderx66:
What you're doing is WRONG.

Our petition has almost 1k signs, and we are in the talks to combine it with another petition which has 12k.

All YOUR petition is doing is lessening the chances of ANYONE getting ICS.

You know how ifanboys talk about Android being Fragmented? Thats exactly what you're doing. Fragmenting us. If ALL the Galaxy S had ONE petition to sign, not only would it be simpler, but it would actually BRING some change.

Your petition for JUST the SGS4G will go no where, and i'm willing to bet anything on that. Not only do you guys have a far less user base, but you are pretty much the child of the Vibrant with a thing or two changed. I would like to think of us, specifically our devices being pretty much the same and would love to cooperate with you, but putting a petition that only involves SGS4G will get your forum nowhere.

If you wish to talk more about this, Do it through PMING me do not post in this thread about this, I don't want it cluttered.

Thank you
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] Fluidification:
if you don't want people signing it, I suggest that you edit your reply and remove quote. This way we will remove all links.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] xriderx66:
Done, and thanks for your cooperation, we're both on the same side :)
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] Bassmanjames:
Signed.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] rickyc19:
Signed...i really hope this gets us somewhere :)
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] jigglynuts:
signed.... Bring on the change!
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] N00B_IN_N33D:
Thanks for the posotive support :D

Spread the word of this movement as much as you can! Put a link to the petition in your signature even! Together we can bring change!

Sent from my SGH-T959 (Samsung Vibrant)
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] Caligula36:
Signed, its already over 1000 signatures.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] thomas.raines:
Signed! Great idea man...
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] ultimakillz:
Signed. Hopefully this will get their attention.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] stephen_w:
Signed. Best of luck to all of us with this. Many thanks to the guys that started this and are keeping it on track.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] leo321:
Signed aswell =)
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] xolanir:
Signed.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] N00B_IN_N33D:
1,180 signatures! Keep it up :D

Sent from my SGH-T959 (Samsung Vibrant)
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] bhundven:
Signed.

Good luck N00B_IN_N33D and Woodrube!
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] GFX.myst.:
signed

sent from within pure darkness.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] cnote74:
Signed
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] bkoon1218:
Signed, but the petition isn't letting me choose the US as my country. I changed it to my state, but it keeps going back to Myanmar.

Hope that doesn't cause problems! :x
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] Harrison85:
Signed :-)
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] Jerry D:
Signed.. USA showed up for me.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] N00B_IN_N33D:
Very strange, however if you truly can't set your location to the United States then Myanmar will have to do.

1,200+ signs! Let's aim for 2,000 now! Spread the word of this petition!

Sent from my SGH-T959 (Samsung Vibrant)
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] heartspains88:
Signed as well, fully behind this. Thank you for your effort. Also shared on facebook and having friends do the same.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] N00B_IN_N33D:
Awesome, share and spread on Facebook. Tell your friends. The more people know about this petition, the better it'll do. :)

Sent from my SGH-T959 (Samsung Vibrant)
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] l0lz0rss:
Why not just buy a new device with ics?
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] bhundven:
Not all of us are rich like you.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] RaverX3X:
then buy me one :P
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] N00B_IN_N33D:
True, why not? Well it's for the same reason this guy didn't pay for a proper repair...

...People be poor :p
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] leo321:
Nice
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] Jerry D:
He must REALLY be Poor! He couldn't even afford Real Duct Tape. Lol..just being funny. Nothing else.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] finch8423:
I signed it, though I still don't think we should even hope this will do anything.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] l0lz0rss:
I don't think this will do anything either.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] bhundven:
Without trying, how would we know?

It's boring when your always pesimistic.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] Beastmode:
I just signed this petition but after reading the petition it seems like it's only asking on behalf of the vibrant? Not trying to say that this wont help or anything but if samsung agrees to this and gives the Vibrant what it wants whats in it for SGS4g owners? just a question.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] hechoen:
Signed. Now let's get it sealed and delivered. Thanks to the OP for the link and the great attempt whether it succeeds or not.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] :
To be honest this phone is more than a year old and most contracts will expire soon so then one should get a newer phone in offer and probably with proper support from Samsung. No talk about other Galaxy S phone which are like 3 years old... come guys lets be realistic.

I believe that we will get an amazing rom soon from devs and maybe CM if we support current devs instead of complaining with what we don't have. Be grateful and supportive for what we do.

Anyway I think this is a good effort so although I don't think it will do anything its worth a try. Please don't troll me. Wont reply. I'm just saying.

Consider this petition SIGNED.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] itzik2sh:
Not able to sign it with non US postal code...

Sent from me
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] N00B_IN_N33D:
Bump... 1,415 Signs :D
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] Fluidification:
By the way, how do you expect to convey the message to Samsung. How do they even know whether we are petitioning?
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] Bassmanjames:
Too all the pessimists that have posted here. Especially if you signed without reading, which I'm sure many of you did ;P

http://www.change.org/info/how-an-online-petition-works

Now quit it with the negativity and spam Samsung with every email address you got.

Be respectful

Always click thanks

Post logs not complaints :)
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] xdiable:
There are numorus ICS roms available for the vibrant and galaxy s so I don't see the point of this petition. Do you want Samsung to release an ugly upped version of ICS with touchwiz? If not I don't see the point.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] leo321:
I think the point is that an official ics for our phone would eventually mean a source drop so we could get the cm9 wheels spinning a lot faster, correct me if I'm wrong.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] Caligula36:
How much you want to bet just like GB, they'll release ICS just for the Galaxy S, and not the S 4G.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] GFX.myst.:
well all i can say here is that if you would have searched before posting this, you would have found that we officially do have GB for the SGS4G and we also have the source for it. its people like you that make the devs here not want to be here anymore and quite frankly most of the senior members also. now come on people, you seriously want that to happen where you come on here to see what you can do for your device and ask questions where none of which will get answered cause there are no devs or senior members here anymore to help. that would just create total chaos. i mean come on now, if it weren't for the devs and senior members, more and more people would still be trying to use ROM Manager and would be like "WTF!?!?!?!?!?!?!" or god forbid, try to flash a ROM from another device and be like "WTF!?!?!?!?!?!?!" keep these forums clean by searching and reading before posting and maybe, just maybe those devs and senior members might actually consider staying.

ok, my rant is done here. :p
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] Caligula36:
Smartass, we only recently got official GB while the other phones had it long before.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] l0lz0rss:
Screw this petition. Sopa is now important.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] leo321:
Not really, its been shelved. Besides, is it too hard to petition two things at once?
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] daxecutioner24:
It's a business,company looks towards the future. A bunch of phones won't be getting an official source ics.devs stayed away from this phone when it came out, much more now when it's getting old.
[Motorola Droid X2] wesf90:
I'm trying to push files to /system via ADB. However I'm having problems (getting permission errors). I am running Eclipse 2.0.2, so yes, my phone is rooted, I have su and busybox. :)

Phone is connected to PC and is set as "USB Mass Storage".

USB Debugging is ON

Here is my CMD log:

C:\android-sdk\tools>adb remount
remount failed: Operation not permitted

I tried to remount and it failed

C:\android-sdk\tools>adb push C:\myfile.apk /system
failed to copy 'C:\myfile.apk' to
'/system/myfile.apk': Read-only file system

I tried to push, and got a READ-ONLY FILE SYSTEM error (keep this in mind)

C:\android-sdk\tools>adb shell
$ adb push C:\myfile.apk /system
adb push C:\myfile.apk /system
adb: permission denied

I try to push inside of ADB shell. Nothing again...

$ su
su
# mount -o remount,rw /dev/block/mtdblock4 /system
mount -o remount,rw /dev/block/mtdblock4 /system
# exit
exit

I go into SU and attempt to remount the /system

$ adb push C:\myfile.apk /system
adb push C:\myfile.apk /system
adb: permission denied
$ exit
exit

I go back up to ADB shell and try to push again... same error as before

C:\android-sdk\tools>adb push C:\myfile.apk /system
failed to copy 'C:\myfile.apk' to '/system/myfile.apk': Permission denied

I go back to the main command line and try to push again. This time I get PERMISSION DENIED. This error is different than before.

Any help on the matter?

I've read about ro.secure needing to be set to 1, but I need to edit the boot.img in order to do this, correct? Does that require an unlocked bootloader? Is root ADB even possible on the DX2.

Thanks!
[Motorola Droid X2] maggard5:
I am no expert (don't even know if i know enough to b called a newb) but maybe try a root explorer. I use es file explorer because it's free. In settings check root explorer and mount file system. I received similar errors and this solved my problem.
[Motorola Droid X2] wesf90:
I'm familiar with root explorer, it's easy. I'm wanting to be able to use ADB though. Your post made me try something new though. I plugged my phone into my PC, then went into root explorer and mounted everything as RW. But, still was unable to push via ADB. Thanks for the reply though :)

So, how can I get ADB working?
[Motorola Droid X2] maggard5:
I was using adb also and had similar problems. After i changed those settings i was able to push a file. I had to have system mounted.
[Motorola Droid X2] wesf90:
No luck on my end :/
[Motorola Droid X2] maggard5:
Sorry i couldn't be more help. I am new to adb and may have done more to get it working. I'm sure there's someone else around here that can help u out.
[Motorola Droid X2] Jan1torEarl:
Make sure there are no spaces in the file path to your android-sdk folder. Can't say if this is your issue but its worth a shot as it has always caused weird problems with android development since day one.
[Motorola Droid X2] CadenH:
Ro.secure is in your local.prop on the root of your phone. As far as your issue you have to reset permissions in order to push to /system. I saw that you were trying to do that but with no success. I believe I know what will help but I will have to find it and repost.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1133528

Ok look at the command lines at the bottom of the op. You are going to use adb shell. Follow that almost exactly but adjust according to your directories. Should go into adb shell, gain su permissions, mount /system rw, push your apk, then don't worry about remounting as ro, just reboot. Pay close attention to spaces.
[Motorola Droid X2] wesf90:
Took me a few days to be able to getting around to trying this, but it didn't work :/ I'm still getting all of the same errors. The /system just doesn't seem to want to mount as RW (even though it is possible when using root explorer).

As for ro.secure in my local.prop, I'm able to edit this but it resets on reboot because (from what I've read) this is a file generated by the kernel

Anyone else have ideas?

Wes
[Motorola Droid X2] ashclepdia:
Moon shadow has a post in development to mount system rw

It's some type of script u run before adb or something

I don't know anything bout adb

But I do know he created it for this reason

Check it out

It's prolly got the info you need
[Motorola Droid X2] wesf90:
Thanks for that! It's not quite what I'm aiming to eventually do, but did give me more insight on how the whole adb/shell/su systems work. From inside of su, I was able to mount the /system as RW, however I'm only able to do this from inside of SU. I want to be able to do this from the initial CMD so that I can ADB PUSH from my computer to the phone.

Here's my latest log:

C:\android-sdk>adb shell

[[TRYING TO MOUNT FROM ADB SHELL]]
$ mount -o rw,remount -t ext3 /dev/block/mmcblk1p21 /system
mount -o rw,remount -t ext3 /dev/block/mmcblk1p21 /system
mount: Operation not permitted

[[TRYING TO MOUNT FROM ADB SHELL USING BUSYBOX]]
$ busybox mount -o rw,remount -t ext3 /dev/block/mmcblk1p21 /system
busybox mount -o rw,remount -t ext3 /dev/block/mmcblk1p21 /system
mount: permission denied (are you root?)

[[GO TO SU]]
$ su
su

[[MOUNTING AS RW SUCCESSFUL]]
# mount -o rw,remount -t ext3 /dev/block/mmcblk1p21 /system
mount -o rw,remount -t ext3 /dev/block/mmcblk1p21 /system

[[COPYING A FILE INSIDE /SYSTEM SUCCESSFUL]]
# cp framework/framework-res.apk framework/framework-res-test.apk
cp framework/framework-res.apk framework/framework-res-test.apk

[[REMOUNTING /SYSTEM AS RO]]
# mount -o ro,remount -t ext3 /dev/block/mmcblk1p21 /system
mount -o ro,remount -t ext3 /dev/block/mmcblk1p21 /system

[[ATTEMPTING TO COPY AGAIN, FAILED]]
# cp framework/framework-res.apk framework/framework-res-test2.apk
cp framework/framework-res.apk framework/framework-res-test2.apk
cp: can't create 'framework/framework-res-test2.apk': Read-only file system
#

So now the question is, how do I mount as R/W so I can use ADB push?

Wes
[Motorola Droid X2] CadenH:
Maybe its because im tired but im confused as to why it wont let you push your files if you have remounted as rw. At that point it should be cake. You gained access to system by remounting it as rw successfully already.
[Motorola Droid X2] jamesh0317:
Try:

adb devices
adb remount
adb push [filename] [destination]
adb reboot

the "adb remount" remounts the fs RW instead of the default RO.
[Motorola Droid X2] Weees:
I'm no expert in ADB, but I had run into the same issue as you and for me the fix was to go into ADB SHELL , then type SU to get SU access, then type exit twice to get out of shell completely. Then I tried pushing the APK and it worked fine with no read only errors.

This worked for me on my SGS2, could work for you ! Goodluck !
[Motorola Droid X2] Moon Shadow - NM:
Come to IRC and I can help you with this. :D http://webchat.freenode.net Come to the #cm7dx2 channel. I'm usually there... Look for the nick(s) Moon|Work|(something), Moon|Home|(something), or MoonShadow-NM. If the (something) says Busy, I might not answer right away. If it says Away, I'm away from the keyboard and you won't receive a response until I return.

Ciao!
[Motorola Droid X2] hellhunter:
Any update

did you ever get this figured out? I'm having the same frustrations on mine. Mine won't install the 2.3.5 update due to it not recognizing the Quickoffice.apk and I'm trying to push the files manually, but I'm having no luck getting past the same you've posted here.
[Motorola Droid X2] ashclepdia:
I've got a better idea to fix your issue brotha!

From my nexus tappin the talk

<edit post successful>
[Motorola Droid X2] ashclepdia:
Do this

Sbf to 2.3.4

(or 2.3.3& take one ota To get to 2.3.4...however you want to do it..just be bone stock 2.3.4 ;) )

Root your device.

BUT DO NOT USE ZERGRUSH TO ROOT

Use petes Motorola one click root method.

Then continue the process as normal from there on out.

Trust me in this. Zergrush root method is not playing nice with your /system partition, (if you notice during the root process it might say something like "making room in system,"= or "moving/deleting app to make room" something similar)

And when it does that, it's messing up how the update checks for untouched stock apps.

Let me know how it goes.

This solution has worked for COUNTLESS others so far, zergrush has always been the culprit when it comes to failing to find certain apk or system file that needs to be there for the update to install.

From my nexus tappin the talk

<edit post successful>
[Motorola Droid X2] iBolski:
This won't work with Eclipse since it's not using 2nd init. I asked this question in the Eclipse forums and Nitro responded with the following:

I know that CM7 allows using the adb remount, but that's because it's using 2nd init. I had also asked the question about why CM7 defaults to root shell when you adb shell into it and that's why he mentions how CM9 won't have root enabled by default.

The way I push to Eclipse is to run root explorer on my phone and mount the directory r/w. Then, I can use "adb push" to the phone.
[Motorola Droid X2] hellhunter:
I think I may have tried that in one of my iterations. Originally I had it rooted with One-Click and then I was having issues with the 2.3.5 OTA update (quickoffice.apk) and at this point I've SBF'ed and rooted it probably 5 times this week so far. Rooted with both One-click and zergRush at various times. Actually I think every time except this last time has been with one-click. So I don't think that has seemed to make a difference for me so far. I can try it again, but if there's any other advice to throw out in the mean time, I'll take it.

Alternatively, I may take the new phone (the first replacement they sent had 2.3.5 on it, but a bad menu key causing the phone to flip out), load Titanium Backup on it, backup all the system apps and restore them to my original phone. Worst case is I have to SBF it again. But that seems like a logical process since I will have two phones available.
[Motorola Droid X2] hellhunter:
So I discovered the sbf I was using was not a stock one. Once I figured that out and got the right files I got it all working and even decided to move on to eclipse 2.2. Still can't push to the folders but unnecessary at this point.
[Motorola Droid X2] ashclepdia:
Ummmm

Where did you get a non stock sbf file from????

And ate you sure you are doing the command right?

Whaerror you get??
[Motorola Droid X2] hellhunter:
It was a packaged Linux ISO file from 1KDS I believe. First thing I just happened to find. It wasn't a direct sbf file. I was using all the right commands just as in the beginning of this thread. I haven't tried since I managed to get everything working right now. When I get some time I'll see what it does now.
[Motorola Droid X2] ashclepdia:
Ooo the boot disk one

Something you had to burn to a cd

Then boot to bios to use or something?

Yea that's not the same as the sbf you flash with rsdlite lol

Lucky you didn't mess something up :p

Glad you didn't :)
[Motorola Droid X2] meskes:
Yes.
[Motorola Droid X2] HEXcube:
Set ro.secure=0

As you might have heard,set ro.secure=0 in default.prop. But, this is no easy job. Every time you boot the device the new default.prop'll get overwritten due to contents of boot partition being reloaded on each boot. You need to flash a boot.img with it's default.prop's ro.secure=0. If it was Android 4.0 , you could have used ro.secure=0 in data/local.prop which is easy to create.

This is not much of an issue as most of the adb root/insecure adb's capabilities can be achieved with su and busybox in adb shell. You may refer to this post for more ways:adb root. If i sound like an expert here :), know that i've also just started to experiment around this adb stuff. Please reply if there are any mistakes.
[Motorola Droid X2] Klamman:
Wrong thread, hope a mod can delete
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] taffjohn:
Hi,

Really loving this rom, except for one small problem:

Recently purchased edmondo pro for my htc desire, tried installing

from "my apps" but get the following message:

missing shared library

Any ideas as i use this app for my running

cheers

-
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Conch411:
Hi,

Try to delete the cache of the market app.
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sudkcoce:
It's a beta rom. Things like that are to be expected...
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] bickynet:
I know it looks really ghetto, I didn't take much time to cut it right. Anyways i had to do it lol.... Got a tpu case from ebay really cheap like 7$ cut it out and it fits perfect but it will only protect the sides, well that's where I drop my phones the most... Im pretty sure some of guys here can do really a good job ! Anyways if you do please post pics... Thanks
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] Monk4Life:
What tpu case did you get? Got a link?
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] bickynet:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/290645985227?ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1497.l2649
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] simeezee:
Just want to double check, is this the battery you got?

http://www.seidioonline.com/t-mobile-galaxy-s-II-3800-extended-life-battery-p/bacy38ssg2t-bk.htm
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] bickynet:
Yeah same thing but i got it from amazon http://www.amazon.com/Seidio-BACY38...T3EM/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1326251170&sr=8-1

Free shipping and little cheaper
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] android4sunny:
Should have thought getting this one....do not have to cut down as it is for T989

http://www.amazon.com/GTMax-Capacit..._1_2?s=wireless&ie=UTF8&qid=1326514121&sr=1-2
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] JJHunterx:
I decided to try a TPU case for my Gnexus. After reading a lot of reviews one of the main complaints was the lack of a cut-out for the volume rocker. After some looking I came across this on ebay.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/190612336399?ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1497.l2649#ht_2147wt_1163

I am very pleased with this case. It fits great and seems to fit better with the VZW extended battery. The case is very snug but not overly tight. All the cut-outs are just right. No ruff edges. I haven't used the screen protector yet so I can't comment on that.

My only complaint is because it is glossy, it shows fingerprints like crazy.

Overall, definitely worth $10.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] cordell507:
i love how dirt cheap cases from china are always the best.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] EVIL JIMMY:
I bought an 's-wave' TPU case from china for £1.75, it's incredible! excellent fit, great protection and looks amazing, all for 10% of some of the big brands! I'm so impressed I ordered another two!