yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Captivate General] TRusselo:
Gingerbread from Samsung has been released.

Rogers released it AGES ago

.Gingerbread from AT&T has NOT been released.

your problem for Gingerbread is with AT&T. NOT SAMSUNG. Samsung released gingerbread to the carriers.

and to the post above, its not about buying an SG1 over a nexus, its about ALREADY OWNING SG1... and not enough memory for ics and touchwiz?? thats a propaganda lie. it would run fine. touchwiz consists of a launcher and a second (TW)framwork-res.apk and a few code changes to other system files. every rom has a laucher, so no loss there, wow extra 7mb framework... ohhh.. noo!

POST 3000!!!!!!
[Captivate General] heinst:
Signed even though I don't own one. :D you guys should get updates too!!
[Captivate General] viny2cool:
Just curious how do you know Samsung released GB to the carriers? Any sources?

EDIT: it is just me who finds big size fonts very irritating and irrelevant?
[Captivate General] popfan:
All carrier control the release of the updates, manufacturers create the updates for the phone, except for the Nexus line which is controlled by Google. The new exception to that might be the Verizon Nexus. The evidence is that the I-896 and I897 are the exact same phone, except one says ATT on the front.
[Captivate General] Cor-master:
Can someone explain this 911 issue? I mean how can you dial 911 and it won't work? IT seems like any number would work! I'm a bit confused by it, am I missing something? Thats seems like a phone being unable to dial, well Pizza hut, I dunno. It doesn't make sense.

Oh and I signed the petition.
[Captivate General] viny2cool:
I think its related to dialing 911 when u don't have any network. I mean when u don't have sim card you can still make emergency calls.

sent from my cappy rocking ICS
[Captivate General] viny2cool:
I agree that they control it. But we don't know if Samsung actually gave it to ATT yet. Also there is no need of those kind of statements like in the post above my first post. No one is forcing him to sign the petition.

sent from my cappy rocking ICS
[Captivate General] kb9nvh:
GB update (using KIES) for captivate:

http://www.samsung.com/us/support/SupportOwnersFAQPopup.do?faq_id=FAQ00024051&fm_seq=24219
[Captivate General] brentett:
I support this, samsung should definitely take some initiative in regards to their previous devices.
[Captivate General] Phoenix-Lead:
Signed!
[Captivate General] jaychoutzj:
I will always be your side.But is it useful?:eek:
[Epic 4G General] xriderx66:
As Galaxy S owners, we are all united. As Android users we are all united. As far as Samsung is concerned we are all NOT created equal. Our device, the Vibrant (SGH-T959), is now being left to the wayside for any future updates from Samsung even though our core specs are extremely similar to the Google Nexus S, which has already received the ICS update. The CyanogenMod team has left us due to the on-going issue of 911/e911 and the lack of the proper code from Samsung to alleviate a potentially fatal result of a custom ROM. It is our intentions to serve Samsung with a petition asking for the update to ICS, which will in-turn, alleviate the 911/e911 issue as well.

We are asking all Galaxy S users to sign this petition to get Samsung to reconsider giving all top end Galaxy S devices the ICS update. Please help us with our goal and sign the petition. If you are on a Galaxy S phone, this affects you too.

Thank you for reading this and please see this link for more details and this link to sign the petition.
[Epic 4G General] xopher.hunter:
Signed. You vibrant owners have it the worst didn't samsung scrap you're gb update too?
[Epic 4G General] xriderx66:
Yes they did. :(

We aren't crying about it though, our developers are amazing :)
[Epic 4G General] || Acer ||:
Same with the Captivate too. Fascinate and Epic are the only ones with official GB, and we still have an official 2.3.6 update coming. (Who knows when, though)
[Epic 4G General] IronReaver17:
Signed :) Samsung needs to pick it up on these updates or else they're not going to have as many customers this year :mad:
[Epic 4G General] KennyG123:
The average users on the street have no clue about updates or even what version of Android they are on. They just know their phone works. It is such a small percentage that know and care about updates.
[Epic 4G General] IronReaver17:
We must educate the masses then!
[Epic 4G General] xgerryx:
Signed. Hope we get some kind of reaction from Samsung.
[Epic 4G General] insanity213:
I'm sure we'll get a reaction.... in the shape of a middle finger....

Edit: The petition only mentions the Vibrant - why not add the rest of the American bastard GalaxyS children to it?
[Epic 4G General] xboxfanj:
I think it'd be best if the petition letter was more general and included all the other Galaxy S devices and not just Vibrant.
[Epic 4G General] k0nane:
+1

No need to leave other GS1 owners out in the cold, which Samsuck plans to do.

Signed anyway, they really screwed you guys.
[Epic 4G General] xriderx66:
Thank you both for the suggestions.

The petition IS for all the Galaxy S Devices, but I understand the petition post is more towards the Vibrant users than others. I'll talk to our writer and get that changed if possible.

edit:

guys don't bother reading this post the way i posted it makes it sound as if i'm trying to get ICS for JUST vibrant. That is NOT the case. Please read the post a few posts below this I'll try to explain as best in my ability.
[Epic 4G General] ksmullins88:
more towards the vibrant? why? We should all get it. not just one galaxy s device.

Edit

Signed, never-the-less.
[Epic 4G General] ÜBER™:
Signed, I want my ics the nexus has it and that's bs its the same damn phone.........

Sent From My Cyan Samurai
[Epic 4G General] xriderx66:
Sorry I think either I mis-wrote that post, or you mis-read it.

I meant to say that WE the people who made the petition letter were at fault because we were summarizing the Vibrant and we did not take note of other Variants.

the petition website,however, is ALL THE WAY FOR ALL GALAXY S DEVICES, NOT JUST VIBRANT.

There is a reason this thread is in every Galaxy S forum and it is not because we want support for just OUR device.

We feel the pain that Galaxy S series has gone through as a whole with the lack of updates. The vibrant wouldn't even have gotten FROYO if it wasn't for one of our other members creating the hashtag #neveragain in which we convinced Samsung to give us Froyo via Kies.

This is for ALL Galaxy S Devices, the guy who wrote the petition letter has just been contacted and told to edit it so it involved the entire Galaxy S series and less towards just Vibrant community.

Thanks for the signs, again guys.
[Epic 4G General] SwimDrewid:
π/2 - θ

(sined). Wut?

sent from my fully armed and operational space phone
[Epic 4G General] KennyG123:
I signed it for all the good it will do. It would take Samsprint 9-12 months to get it to work and release it. I will be on an LTE Quad core with ICS by then.
[Epic 4G General] ac16313:
Actually it should be more general... all these petitions that are geared specifically for one Galaxy S device are pointless.

Less voters less support no actual motive behind half the voters. But yes I voted and I support it eitherway.
[Epic 4G General] xriderx66:
I have admitted my mistake in that post which made it sound bad please read the post quoted above.
[Epic 4G General] Exel:
Thanks for the suggestions, we'll revise our petition to include more broad information about all Galaxy S phones rather than focus our point on the Vibrant.

Keep signing, though, we've got to work together on this one.
[Epic 4G General] ac16313:
Good stuff, won't be much use to us, but for what its worth Samsung deserves a headache over this issue. Just leaving half their GS line in the dark...
[Epic 4G General] Ceelos09:
Just signed the petition. Always glad to lend fellow Android users a hand, especially when they're (we're) being screwed over updates.
[Epic 4G General] XxLostSoulxX:
More Like we all be on 3GHz Quad-core, Self-Cooling, LTE2, Etc...
[Epic 4G General] Zeinzu:
Don't forget to mention the fact that Samsung is lying to the general public about all of the gs1 line's capability to run ICS.

Signed btw. I'll probably stick with cm7 then move straight to cm9 anyway but it's still bull**** that Samsuck gets away with this kind of crap and is allowed to lie straight to their customer's faces.
[Epic 4G General] lviv73:
Damn,dint Vibrant development started out way better then Epic?I guess our complaints did some good.

I will sign this because these phones are so similar that there is no reason for this sht.
[Epic 4G General] Woody:
We are currently deciding how and what to revise to encompass more GS1 and less Vibrant in the petition.

The issue with the 3rd paragraph about how the Vibrant was released with 2.1 and then we fought for 2.2 only to be denied GB/ICS

is in there to paint the picture of how consumer support has failed

. It is specific to the Vibrant but the picture is for all Galaxy S users.

The CM team portion leaving the Vibrant is a problem (911/e911) that effects us all. For some reason they just dropped ONLY the Vibrant from their supported devices list b/c of this issue.

Still, we want to thank you for your support and help with this and hopefully they will at least listen to us.
[Epic 4G General] megabiteg:
Signed...

But this is the #1 reason I will never buy a Samsung Mobile Phone Ever again, they have a good track record of just wanting to attract revenue by new sales, they don't care about long term support.

Everyone should just STOP purchasing their devices and choose elsewhere... I jumped ship for the Evo 4G & 3D and though these devices aren't perfect I've had good update tracks with them...

IMO if you want to show them unification, eveyone jump ship and leave, don't come back and then they will see a void. Remember: they already have your money, they really don't care.
[Epic 4G General] adelmundo:
Even though the Epic is unique, we share a kinship to ALL Galaxy S variants. They are our family members, and family support each other. If collectively all the Galaxy S owners get together, we are a bigger voice, than say just Vibrant, or Epic, or Captivate, or Fascinate, or i9000, etc. If the HTC people managed to make HTC change their mind about locked bootloaders, then maybe our voice is large enough to effect a change with Samsung.
[Epic 4G General] Woody:
Exactly the thought behind this and why we need your help.
[Epic 4G General] zanderman112:
Signed. 10char.
[Epic 4G General] tazfanatic:
signed 10 char
[Epic 4G General] Fatonuseni:
I rather support our devs.

Samsung has thrown us to the curb.
[Epic 4G General] zanderman112:
Yeah, but at least sign for the other GS phones that didn't get GB.

Sent from my Legendary 2.2 infused device.
[Epic 4G General] cds0699:
Signed, hope Galaxy S devices get the ICS update.
[Epic 4G General] the_dark_knighton:
Signed!

I heard that in November they agreed to support all phones for a minimum of 18 months. But since our phone came out before the agreement, they aren't going to worry about us
[Epic 4G General] Silpher:
Signed.

Few days ago I messaged my Vibrant-owning friend about how excited I was to finally have CM7 *with WiMax*. He replied with one sentence regarding being dropped by CM bc of the 911 issue and then silence. Obviously his heart was broken and he needs a new one. So everyone, think of my friend (lets just call him Timmy) and his need for a new heart, and sign this petition!!
[Epic 4G General] Woody:
Thank you all for your support with this. We need solidarity and our fellow GSes are coming through. Keep signing.
[Epic 4G General] xriderx66:
Good point, but since you like to support the Devs, if Samsung was to release.. lets say even a source for ICS on our devices, the possibilities would be ENDLESS for devs. You remember when our devices got Froyo? All those new ROMS that popped up every other day? YEP thats what will happen if we get ICS. It helps the devs out long ways.

I wouldn't stay on Stock rom for long anyways, only time before a dev just customizes ICS to the full potential.

Thank you everyone for signing. Every sign counts.
[Epic 4G General] the_dark_knighton:
I've got folks on the evo in on the petition
[Epic 4G General] N00B_IN_N33D:
Awesome, spread the word as much as you can. The more signs the merrier. :)
[Epic 4G General] Exel:
Links to Samsung Twitter/Facebook/Google+:

Twitter:

- twitter.com/samsungtweets

- twitter.com/samsungmobileus

- https://twitter.com/SamsungJohn

- https://twitter.com/DigitalTrends

Facebook:

- www.facebook.com/SamsungUSA

- www.facebook.com/SamsungMobileUSA

Google+:

- https://plus.google.com/114303379611712597260/posts
[Epic 4G General] Zeinzu:
Spam their wall and pm box. Bet they "look into a possible update" again.
[Epic 4G General] Woody:
Can you go into the Vibrant link and post your link to the Evo thread? The link in this OP will take you straight there. We are starting to put this all over and don't want any duplicates. Thanks for your support and sigs everyone.
[Epic 4G General] the_dark_knighton:
Done and done!
[Epic 4G General] the_dark_knighton:
984! We are almost there! Thanks for all you guys. You are the reason Android is the BEST
[Epic 4G General] Zeinzu:
Samsung keeps removing my wall posts about it this.
[Epic 4G General] flastnoles11:
Mine to... I'm gonna keep putting them up until they get tired of taking theem down
[Epic 4G General] Woody:
I put both these posts in the Vibrant thread.

Now we have their attention. Blast em'
[Epic 4G General] dbpaddler:
Will sign when I'm home. And I won't be running some quad core this and that before this could happen. Our phone has no replacement and doesn't look like it's getting one any time soon. So I'll be keeping the Epic until they don't have any more returns to replace them. Not giving up the keyboard to get a better anything. I do too much doc work and heavy emailing on it.

Sent from my SPH-D700
[Epic 4G General] drakkahn:
Signed, good luck
[Fascinate General] xriderx66:
As Galaxy S owners, we are all united. As Android users we are all united. As far as Samsung is concerned we are all NOT created equal. Our device, the Vibrant (SGH-T959), is now being left to the wayside for any future updates from Samsung even though our core specs are extremely similar to the Google Nexus S, which has already received the ICS update. The CyanogenMod team has left us due to the on-going issue of 911/e911 and the lack of the proper code from Samsung to alleviate a potentially fatal result of a custom ROM. It is our intentions to serve Samsung with a petition asking for the update to ICS, which will in-turn, alleviate the 911/e911 issue as well.

We are asking all Galaxy S users to sign this petition to get Samsung to reconsider giving all top end Galaxy S devices the ICS update. Please help us with our goal and sign the petition. If you are on a Galaxy S phone, this affects you too.

Thank you for reading this and please see this link for more details and this link to sign the petition.
[Fascinate General] jambotech:
I concur

Sent from my HTC Incredible S
[Fascinate General] sageDieu:
I signed, thanks for doing this. We deserve better than this... where would Samsung be without the consumer?

Sent from my ICS SCH-i500
[Fascinate General] mkuehl06:
"Ooh la la" verizon's "Tutsi fruitsi!"... oh wait

MOD EDIT: censored upon request
[Fascinate General] chopper the dog:
Well the ns4g was given ics from google and not samsung. But the problem becomes a ram issue (fascinate has only 384mb, not sure on the other variants) and the fact that samsung isn't going to give you straight up ics, it would be a fat pig that includes touch wiz and would also munch all of the ram just on boot. Even cm9 has it's ram challenges running on the fascinate. I'm not at all surprised or shocked that samsung has made this decision. But good luck with your efforts.

good day.
[Fascinate General] Exel:
Links to Samsung Twitter/Facebook/Google+:

Twitter:

- twitter.com/samsungtweets

- twitter.com/samsungmobileus

- https://twitter.com/SamsungJohn

- https://twitter.com/DigitalTrends

Facebook:

- www.facebook.com/SamsungUSA

- www.facebook.com/SamsungMobileUSA

Google+:

- https://plus.google.com/114303379611712597260/posts
[Fascinate General] mkuehl06:
Guess I can't tell a joke without people getting all pissy
[Fascinate General] xriderx66:
haha what'd you actually say? I'm curious since people reported it :P
[Fascinate General] mkuehl06:
People report stuff cause they "find it offensive" well it is the truth what I said. It just is kinda annoying not to get a pm asking me to revise my post or anything. I would have revised it myself. But oh well, this isn't the place to ***** about the mods doing their jobs :rolls eyes:
[Fascinate General] zas311:
Sorry. I already had enough upgrades thanks to Samsung & especially to great people here. Will have a GNote when it comes with ICS in a few months. New OS should be run on new phones so that it could be appreciated fully.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] xriderx66:
As Galaxy S owners, we are all united. As Android users we are all united. As far as Samsung is concerned we are all NOT created equal. Our device, the Vibrant (SGH-T959), is now being left to the wayside for any future updates from Samsung even though our core specs are extremely similar to the Google Nexus S, which has already received the ICS update. The CyanogenMod team has left us due to the on-going issue of 911/e911 and the lack of the proper code from Samsung to alleviate a potentially fatal result of a custom ROM. It is our intentions to serve Samsung with a petition asking for the update to ICS, which will in-turn, alleviate the 911/e911 issue as well.

We are asking all Galaxy S users to sign this petition to get Samsung to reconsider giving all top end Galaxy S devices the ICS update. Please help us with our goal and sign the petition. If you are on a Galaxy S phone, this affects you too.

Thank you for reading this and please see this link for more details and this link to sign the petition.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] nrm5110:
I signed lol
[Galaxy S I9000 General] pynex:
Great Idea - of course I signed, too
[Galaxy S I9000 General] trislr:
Me too, if GS is not updated ICS, i never buy SS phone again.:mad:
[Galaxy S I9000 General] dario3040:
Samsung have a very good reason to not update the device.

Begging them for the impossible is a waste of time.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] saphirrot:
People like you should shout up if they don't know what they talking about.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] spamtrash:
People like you SHOULD SHUT up instead of SHOUTING in language which they don't understand...:D:D:D
[Galaxy S I9000 General] Exel:
If you don't want to support this petition, why post in it? We've heard it many times, blahblahblah Samsung won't do anything, and if that's so.. then oh well, at least we tried. Thanks for the support everyone!
[Galaxy S I9000 General] xriderx66:
I disagree.

We, the consumers, have a voice. Yeah sure they have our money but what they DON'T want is bad publicity. If they get that the people who HAVEN'T bought their phones won't, and the people who know whats going on won't. Thats a big population that will not be buying their products. If you don't know what #neveragain was it was a twitter petition started by one of our fellow Vibrant users. Vibrant was denied Froyo, and so we started that and it showed up EVERYWHERE. and Samsung granted us Froyo.

I would also like to know your "very good reason" that Samsung has to not update the devices.

ICS can run smooth on our phones, we have a stable build of ICS on our forums.

Please don't start a argument, posts like these will only lead to failure in this thread. If people do not wish to sign, i'm cool with that, but I just want to point out that EVERY SIGN MATTERS.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] N00B_IN_N33D:
Agreed. People do have a voice. In the words of Ghandi...
[Galaxy S I9000 General] noobwork94:
I sign to.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] Bogeko:
I signed :D
[Galaxy S I9000 General] mamkarah:
I signed to
[Galaxy S I9000 General] Woody:
Thank you all for your support with this. We need solidarity and our fellow GSes are coming through. Keep signing.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] guust:
I signed

unhappy user of samsung
[Galaxy S I9000 General] burakgon:
I'm an i9000 user and signed for vibrant bros for cyanogenmod support.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] xriderx66:
Don't worry fellow Galaxy User, this is not just for Vibrant users. This is for the entire Galaxy S series.

Spread the word, and thanks again for the signs guys.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] kellermanv:
I feel discriminated. Your petition did not mention the other galaxy s models like S PLUS (i9001).

Son, i am dissapoint.

I will sign this only if you add i9001 there aswell.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] burakgon:
Plus is different.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] xriderx66:
Sir, you did not read the petition then. On the OP we do mention Vibrant a few times, yes, but we are not just going for the Vibrant.

This is for ALL Galaxy S Devices that are capable of running ICS. There ARE Galaxy S devices that are low-end and seeing ICS on it would just bring shame to it.

... Lets say JUST the I9000 gets official ICS, that would still help all the other variants to get ICS, but this petition is for ALL GALAXY S DEVICES THAT ARE CAPABLE. I don't know much about I9001, but i just googled, and it LOOKS like its a i9000 and i'm sure its considered a high-end so this includes that device as well.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] Woody:
We have taken out the Vibrant model number from the first sentence of the petition and replaced it with Galaxy S.

The issue with the 3rd paragraph about how the Vibrant was released with 2.1 and then we fought for 2.2 only to be denied GB/ICS

is in there to paint the picture of how consumer support has failed. It is specific to the Vibrant but the picture is for all Galaxy S users.

The CM team portion leaving the Vibrant is a problem (911/e911) that effects us all. For some reason they just dropped ONLY the Vibrant from their supported devices list b/c of this issue.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] refthemc:
Most likely everyone here owns one already but just in case, slickdeals just posted a deal on a Galaxy Nexus if anyone is interested.

http://slickdeals.net/f/3784966-Sam...martphone-with-Wi-Fi-3G-4G-and-HD-Display-565

Hope this helps...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] nxt:
Already posted.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1427619
[Xperia Play Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] klumzybaby:
Okay guys so I read the other threads regarding going back to stock from cm7 and

I understand how to flash back and everything. But my problem is...when I first got my phone it was bootloader locked and it's also the r800at version. After successfully getting the bootloader unlocked I rooted and flashed the ROM Cm7.2 then noticed the model became r800i but I still have "4g" speed via H+. So I want to go back to stock with doom kernel but am wondering which ROM I need which is either the UK generic or the north America one also will I still have H+ speeds? Sorry for such a long post!! Figured that more info resulted in better reply!!

Thanks guys in advanced!! ^.^
[Xperia Play Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] thatsupnow:
Just flash the north American rom and put your apn settings in again and you should be good to go
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] kamilooo:
Hello,

is it possible to connect to wifi with ssid and password in terminal.

Thanks. And best regards.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] kamilooo:
is there sombody who can explain me, how i can copy text like "hello" to clipboard via terminal?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Joshaldo:
Hey guys I have found sometimes when I open the market app i will start typing to search for an app then all of a sudden it just goes back to the home screen. Does this happen to anyone else at all? I am on 4.01
[Atrix 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] akyboy:
... BELL - giving me com.motorola.service.main FC on new emails.

Any idea what i can do to fix this?

Also,.. I still have Superuser installed after Factory reset? Should this be deleted?

Tnx
[Atrix 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] marko!:
what have you done either than Rooting