yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] EarlZ:
Anywhere that can clearly show it no longer has banding, perhaps the skype application or the angry birds splash screen?

I dont really care to much about banding as every mobile phone I've used has that issue, I've learned to live with it.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] joshoon:
Well I am actually not used to it at all, I've never had it with my phones :P

Not with my HD2, nor with my Desire HD.

I put 'Making picture of screen' in my tasks on my G-Note :)

I will post a picture when I'm home ;)

Anyways, it looks like it got back again a little bit, but I'll see how it goes through the day, it seems a very unstable screen to me :S
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] EarlZ:
You should be checking in a dark environment, sometimes reflections can make displays appear 'better'
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] joshoon:
I think you were right there, I keep seeing the banding now.

Havent seen my mate with SGS2 yet to compare.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] vcespon:
I had this problem on my Galaxy Note after just 3 months since purchase. The screen looks definetly light-brown when looked straight-on. Tilting the device in any direction makes the white look more white. This is a fault with the manufacturing process, some layer is not behaving as expected, as the image proyected on the AMOLED is white, but then it gets filtered by some layer above.

I took it to the local Samsung technical service and they did not even look at it, it must be a very common complain. They just proceeded to replace the whole screen (AMOLED, digitizer and gorilla glass, an €200 part). The new screen still has a very slight yellow tint when looked at perpendiculary, but at least I got rid of the burn-in that was already visible on the top of the screen and some uneven vertical bands that were on the right of the original screen.

The black crushing problem is still there. All Galaxy Notes I have seen show pure black for any color below RGB (4,4,4), and gray levels above that are too bright. I have loaded several test images used to calibrate monitors, and the Galaxy Note screen is very bad at displaying dark colors.
[Xoom Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] 3devious:
While there has been some amazing work on some of these ROMs that are out there, I was wondering if you *must* change the kernel to access USB media or write to the SD card. I mainly obtained root to be able to change the boot animation and other things that I can do myself.
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] Delanoister:
This is a custom kernel for Galaxy Fit GT-S5670 Updated for OC

It's for KPQ firmware :D

Cause It ain't include wifi module.

So. if u test on other ROM, wifi get problem :D

I've compiled 2.6.35.7-perf-CL712865 :)

Sorry before for delay update

Cz I have no this device :D

Features:

Overclockable to 844MHz

Support Ext 3 and Ext 4 sdcard format/internal partition

Cifs & Tun support

added scaling governors (interactifve, smartass, smartassV1, smartassV2, savagedzen, scary, minmax, interactiveX, lazy, virtuous, msm7k, lagfree, brazilianwax, ondemandX, lulzactive, lionheart)

added 3 i/o scheduller for better i/o (cfq, vr, sio)

known bug:

-

Download links :

Dell-custom-kernel v1.0 ---

> here [stock600MHz]

Dell-Custom-Kernel_v1.0-r1 ---> here [OC support]

Pass: delanoister

*Do nanbackup first before try this kernel.

Steps to install :

If you're from a custom ROM or other ROM using cwm recovery, u need to flash xrecovery file first

Flash xrecovery file by Odin

After that, Go to xrecovery (press Home+Power on/off button while your phone's off)

Choose Install zip from sdcard

And choose a kernel u've downloaded

Reboot and Enjoy! ;)

if u have problem with this kernel, report me, plz! :)

Tested on .rfs system (not .ext4 system)

Do With Your Own RIsk!
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] Delanoister:
For screenshots

​

And, here for quadrant score previews :D [THX to Gandoct @Kaskus to help me review for my kernel]

​
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] Delanoister:
-reserved by-
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] LegoGabi:
You mean this kernel works with all the roms ?

Will this work on Creeds Rom v1.6 ?
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] Delanoister:
No. Please read an info above.

It's for KPQ firmware (with .rfs system) :D

I haven't tested with Creeds ROM.
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] aya.yaya:
:D

can u add oc scaling?

:D

you're rock ommmm
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] varun.katoch:
thanks for working on fit ...

welcome to the fit family :-)

happy to have another devloper for fit

:-)

i hope u add overclocking soon ...

thank you bro :)
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] Delanoister:
I hope I can add cpu scaling more later hehe :D

But, examine time get closed.

Cause I'm a 3rd grader of high school. hehe :)
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] Delanoister:
Thx, bro.

I hope I can do it hehe.
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] justkiddinghere:
expecting overclock in future :P
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] Mr.Oug:
Finally some development for fit other than porting.... :|
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] Delanoister:
Kernel UPDATE

Check pageone! :)
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] neil.richard:
Superb job bro!...

I have a request can u make the same kernel for fit cm7.2 rc5 as Squadzone made for Mini?...

galaxy fit + CM7.2 Rc5(2.3.7) + 801Mhz
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] rgshah3:
Where is xrecovery?
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] Delanoister:
I'll try, but I ain't promise. cz I have no fit device :D

But, I will try later.

On my kernel, it's there
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] neil.richard:
Thanx for ur reply!...

By the way I flashed the Mini 864Mhz kernel and the soft keys were not working!Rest everything was working fine!...

galaxy fit + CM7.2 Rc5(2.3.7) + 801Mhz
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] maelfilk:
So any1 tried it? Is it stable?
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] Delanoister:
What did u mean?

And why did u flash mini-kernel?

There're some differents. Although on their source kernel are same.

There need a modification.

Sent from my Andro-ID phone
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] Delanoister:
Have a look pageone! :)

There's a user uses my kernel.

Like on reviews.

Sent from my Andro-ID phone
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] -HellRaiser-:
dev pls make ur kernel compatible with roms like cm7.2 and razodroid.its very boring to use stock rom.
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] neil.richard:
I mean I flashed the CM7.2 rc5 864Mhz kernel by squadzone for Galaxy Mini on Galaxy Fit!...

Everything is fine but the soft keys don't work and the screen sometimes becomes kind of blurry!...

Edit- "Camera wont work"!

galaxy fit + CM7.2 Rc5.1(2.3.7) + 801Mhz
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] kudo shinichi:
To cut short you want delanoister to port the exact kernel by modifying it to make soft key work

galfit >> cm7.2 >> rc5.1
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] neil.richard:
exactly!...and i know u and others also wish the same!;)

galaxy fit » CM7.2 Rc5.1(2.3.7) » 801Mhz
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] -HellRaiser-:
where can i find xrecovery file to install this on coustom rom??
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] kudo shinichi:
Of course

galfit >> cm7.2 >> rc5.1
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] :
On S5670XXKPQ this kernel work nice. I've maked overclock on 844 MHz and all OK. Thanks for this kernel.
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] Deshabilitado:
Will this work on another stock rom version? like Gingerbread.UBKP 2.3.6?
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] rgshah3:
Couldn't find d link to xrecovery

Please help. :)
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] Delanoister:
Have u tested on another ROM using ext4 fs?

Cz I made my kernel to support ext4 internal. It should can be used.

( •̃͡⊝̮•̃͡)( •̃͡⊝̮•̃͡)๏ђέђέђέђέ๏( •̃͡⊝̮•̃͡)( •̃͡⊝̮•̃͡)
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] Delanoister:
I.think it caused by synaptics driver is different n board.
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] -HellRaiser-:
i hv tested only on cm7.2 and razodroid and i want to use this kernel only in one of those
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] Delanoister:
It's a custom kernel.

Ain't a ROM. ;)

Xrecovery file is there on my zip file
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] Delanoister:
I haven't seen kernel modules on another ROM.

I haven't seen a changelist one by one :)

If modules are same as changelist.

It can be used ;)
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] Delanoister:
Xrecovery file.is.there on my zip.file.

Take it, flash it by Odin as one package :)
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] Delanoister:
(^Ő^)/ ŐĶĂŶ....,.

I will check later.

Cz I'm on a not-free-time.

i am on learning for examine for several months ahead.
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] irsemoticon:
great bro.

maybe you can make kernel for DXKT4 :D

i will try it
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] -HellRaiser-:
wait u mean the kernel link on the first page is the xrecovery file???

if not r u saying that the .zip we downloaded have the xrecovery file.if yes then i cant fing it.

also the first link for 600mhz isnt working pls update.
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] Delanoister:
(^Ő^)/ ŐĶĂŶ...., ("(.^ .^.)"). ※ τћªŉκ ўσŮ ※

Ok dxkt4.
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] Delanoister:
Xrecovery n my kernel is included as one pack.

One item flash by odin (xrecovery),

One item flash by update zip recovry (kernel)
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] -HellRaiser-:
ohhhkk now i understood u mean we have to flash the same file by first odin and then by cwm.
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] sid_rangra:
Can we install it over 2.3.6 DDKT1 ..??
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] Feras.Rehman:
Hey thanks man! :)
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] Feras.Rehman:
No! ;) He has written clearly see!
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] eslam hassan:
What is the different between

Dell-custom-kernel v1.0 ---> here [stock600MHz]

Dell-Custom-Kernel_v1.0-r1 ---> here [OC support]?

explain please ,,,
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] eslam hassan:
What is the different ?

What is the different between

Dell-custom-kernel v1.0 ---> here [stock600MHz]

Dell-Custom-Kernel_v1.0-r1 ---> here [OC support]?

explain please ,,,
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] Delanoister:
1st item is.only clock.till 600MHz

2nd.is.till.844.:)
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] eslam hassan:
can I use Dell-Custom-Kernel_v1.0-r1 --- for my rom which is
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] Delanoister:
I don't think so. :)

Cz my kernel has different changelist.

Different modules.

So, maybe if it can boot. Wifi has problem :D
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] Seth25:
Maybe I'm stupid, but I've read this topic twice and can't find xrecovery.

It's not included in the zip file, it's just the CWM update zip there...

Only the OC version can be downloaded, the other link is dead, maybe it was included there...

Any help? Thanks.

I have CWM installed, but when I try to flash the kernel I get an error, I suppose that's what xrecovery is for....
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] zcop:
In CWM enable assert, disable Check Certificate, re-install you zip

U can flash that zip under Stock Recovery. try this.
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] Seth25:
Thanks, it's my GF's phone, so I'll give it a try as soon as I get my hands on it again. :D

LE: Worked like a charm, doing quadrant now with OC.

BTW, what governor and I/O is best for performance?
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] sid_rangra:
there is no such file in your provided .zip file !
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] neil.richard:
Can this kernel be used on CM7???. ..

Did anyone gave it a try?..:rolleyes::rolleyes:

galaxy fit + CM7.2 Rc5.6(2.3.7) + 801Mhz
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] Delanoister:
performance and vr . . they are sweety couple LOL :)) I'm kidding

Sorry, I meant on my v1.0 kernel version :D

Then, extract it. . or u just flash via CWM. . I think it work, if your CWM support rfs,too :D

I dont think so, there need a modifications on ramdisk :)
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] neil.richard:
What about Andro-ID by tj?

galaxy fit + CM7.2 Rc5.6(2.3.7) + 801Mhz
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] Delanoister:
I think so :)
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] :
Please custom kernel for S5670XWKTI (Germany).I tried this kernel on S5670XWKTI and wi-fi don't work.
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] chevdor:
Hello,

It was hard to find the appropriate section for this question.

I will NOT ask here any comparison of the specs or other benchmark. I also hope this will not degenerate as a trolled topic.

I consider buying one of the mentioned tablets. I think both are good and if course I read a lot about both. Everyday my heart lean toward one or the other.

Posting in the Galaxy Tab forum is probably good actually.

Let's make it short: I generally like Samsung. I actually own a Galaxy S2 and I would not exchange for anything else.

Those topics often end up as competition when users try to comfort their own choice. I hope this won't be the case.

So back to the topic. Being a Samsung guy

I naturally preferred the tab despite a slightly higher price...until I tried a xoom (not the

Xoom 2).

I actually was surprised and disappointed by the Tab (7501).

I found it laggy.

I went back and forth between the 7501 and the mz601 and I found the xoom nicer to the eye. This may not have anything to do with the pure processing. The tab may be overall faster (no idea) but I could for example see an obvious difference when I opened the browser.

I did the test in a store, with the devices side by side. You know how it is in stores...you never know what has been done before do I rebooted both tablet.

I had in mind a video from YouTube showing the xoom booting in about twice the time of the tab. This is definitely not what happened. I will spare the milliseconds but the xoom was actually faster (maybe half a second....).

Now freshly booted, I compared again. Same result. Damn

I like the tab but again the xoom looks better.

I went home not knowing what to think....

Back to the store the day after thinking it may have been biased somehow.

I tested again with power plugged or not. No matter what, the xoom is faster.

I am witting this post hoping someone who tried both the Galaxy Tab 10.1 and the xoom 2 could give some feedback.

At the moment, I am really tempted to go for a Xoom 2. The main killers of the xoom have been fixed (size and weight).

The 'best' tablet depends of course of the taste and the usage so let me summarize mine.

I play almost no game. Interest its mainly in browsing Web, watching photos/videos while keeping an Android device.

I have seen a few folks doing comparison of real use.I find that pretty cool. You start both tablet at the same time and run the same scenario such as opening the browser, going to the same url, then watching a video, etc...

I like those tests because in the end

I prefer a tablet that takes time to boot (I may reboot my phone twice a month...)and is more responsive later.

So can someone tell me why the tab is better?

Did I run into a defective model maybe?
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Matrix_19:
I didn't see the Xoom 2

but if it can help you :

http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/05/motorola-xoom-2-review/

Question : why would you take a Xoom 2 if you can buy a Transformer Prime ?
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] chevdor:
The TF201 could be an answer indeed but considering the current problems, I don't feel like jumping in now.

Imo the prime its a great product with lacks in design. This will be fixed I am sure. I may wait until then.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Is_907:
Hey all, I got a brand new E4GT yesterday and flashed the One-Touch w/ root EL26 package in the ROM database.

After that I used the autoroot kit to install CWM.

Everything is great, I was able to flash CM7.2, etc but I have horrible reception at work (partially the building) and really slow data speeds.

I want to flash EL13 or even EK02 radio, but every time I flash EK02 in CWM, it gets to about 98%, hangs for about 8 or 10mins, then aborts.

Is there something I've missed? Should I revert to an EK02 kernel before I do an EK02 radio?

CWM has saved an error log and I'll pull it when I get home from work to post here if that helps.

Thanks in advance.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Judah001:
Some people are having similar issues depending on their phone and location with modems. I would recommend trying different modems until you find the one that works best for you. Many of the modems you can flash through CWM. Here is the Wiki link for the different modems. One thing to consider is the kernal you are running too. For my phone I get better dl/ul with stock kernal on EL26. When I changed the rom it tweaked my kernal causing a lower DL/UL speed. You just need to find the right combo for you. Good luck!

Here is the Wiki link for the different modems, kernals, and Roms.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1391732
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Is_907:
Thanks. I may flash back to stock kernel, rom, and modem then work my way up from there.

So far any time I flash just a modem it hangs then fails.

Cheers.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Duce HD2:
It takes a good 2 minutes before flashing is complete on a modem.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Is_907:
It actually does fail, though. CWM says "installation aborted" etc and points me to a log file.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Judah001:
Make sure you are downloading the modem that can be installed through CWM and not an Odin zip. Also I would try installing a kernel that would match whatever modem you are trying to install first then install the modem. Here is the one that I used for EL26. I would give this kernal a shot before you give up on EL26.

Try this link for your kernal EL26

http://chris41g.devphone.org/index.php?dir=EpicTouch/Stock+Repack/EL26/

El26 Modem link

http://www.multiupload.com/XIHNVS6S8Y

Here is a YouTube video also

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uGAamjtNwk
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Is_907:
I flashed back to G30, rooted, upgraded to EK02 and restored my CM nand.

So, ek02 modem and kernel ATM work fine but no difference really. I think the true problem is the building at work. Oh well.

Will probably upgrade to that el26 kernel and modem soon though.

Thanks for all the input and links, everyone.
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] MrEpic:
I have used wiki..seen a lot of different post from diff people in the forums but i thought i would ask for all the experts to fully explain in one post..the dumb downed version of course..of what a kernel is? Well, maybe thats not as important as what does it do...what is the most desirable trait for a kernel to have...what does it affect..is it more to it than ocing and uving..what are some of the big diffs between the available kernels...thanks in advance...just trying to understand my epic a lil more!!! Thanks guys!!!
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] schnowdapowda:
A kernel is the "core" of an operating system. It serves as a bridge if you will between the actual computing being done at the hardware level and the applications that you use. Oc'ing, uv'ing, voodoo, and other kernel mods are components called modules that are kind of like directions for the kernel to control the hardware in that way.
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] schnowdapowda:
And as far as desirable traits go, some people prefer stability while others prefer the bleeding edge. This is why open source is cool cause we have the choice.
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ÜBER™:
I don't think that's as dumb-downed as it can get so ill give it a try. Your operating system (android) is a really hot girl....the kernel is the dbag she is with..... depending on how handsome, strong and big he is the more he is capable of doing......LMAO. hope that gets the point across better XD

Sent From My Cyan Samurai
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] androidmaster1:
hahahah, bigg now that's an excellent analogy. hahaha.

now let me take a different approach. a "kernel" is the engine in a car. oc/uv is like using nitros or ram air to help it become faster and somewhat stronger. and "roms" are the interior of your car. themes are the cars body frame. when you change kernels, you either put a 4cylinder, 6cylinder, or an 8 cylinder engine in the car. does that help clarify also?
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] IronReaver17:
Nicely said guys :)
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] MrEpic:
Haha...nicee...y somebody just aint say so....how can a guy not be able to relate to cars and women lol!!!
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] MrEpic:
I havent read yet...but imma thank you in advance lol....one moment please while i process this...<jeopardy theme plays>...
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] schnowdapowda:
What a cute gerbil!!!
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] MrEpic:
Reading this made me realize how important it is to ask your question ...correctly lol....thanks Sadie for that most useful information on Kernels!!
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] SadieNibblesworth:
I must state for the record, that the profile picture is not a gerbil, she is a Silver Marten rabbit named Sadie Lovington Nibblesworth of Hoppingtonshirebridgetonportburgville upon Northernlivingroom. Together, we develop for various computer platforms.

---------- Post added at 06:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:18 PM ----------

I just wanted to share with you some "classic" papers that serve as introductory material when first learning about operating systems in computer science. They are easy, easy reads, and if you want to start a journey into learning the more "technical" side of operating systems...

ALL of these papers can easily be found by simply copying the pasting the title in Google. Or Google Scholar. Or going to a university library:

J. Fotheringham, "Dynamic Storage Allocation in the Atlas Computer, Including an Automatic Use of a Backing Store," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 4, No.10, October 1961, pp. 435–436.

F. J. Corbató, M. M. Daggett, and R. C. Daley, "An Experimental Time-Sharing System," Proceedings of the AFIPS 1962 Spring Joint Computer Conference (SJCC), May 1962, pages 335–344.

F. J. Corbató and V. A. Vyssotsky, "Introduction and Overview of the Multics System," Proceedings of the AFIPS 1965 Fall Joint Computer Conference (FJCC), 1965, Spartan Books: New York, pp. 185–196.

E. W. Dijkstra, "The Structure of the THE Multiprogramming System," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 11, No. 5, May 1968, pp. 341–346.

D. M. Ritchie and K. Thompson, "The UNIX Time-sharing System," Bell System Technical Journal, Vol. 57, No. 6, 1978, pp. 1905–1929.

---------- Post added at 06:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:22 PM ----------

And here is a list of "classic" kernel papers I have on my computer right now (with links included):

M. Accetta, R. Baron, W. Bolosky, D. Golub, R. Rashid, A. Tevanian, and M. Young, "Mach: A New Kernel Foundation for Unix Development," Proceedings of the Usenix Summer Technical Conference, July 1986.

B. Bershad, S. Savage, P. Pardyak, E. G. Sirer, D. Becker, M. Fiuczynski, C. Chambers and S. Eggers, "Extensibility, Safety and Performance in the SPIN Operating System," Proceedings of the Fifteenth Symposium on Operating System Principles (SOSP), December 1995, pp. 267-284.

M. F. Kaashoek, D. R. Engler, G. R. Ganger, H. M. Briceño, R. Hunt, D. Mazières, T. Pinckney, R. Grimm, J. Jannotti, and K. MacKenzie, "Application Performance and Flexibility on Exokernel Systems," Proceedings of the Sixteenth Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (SOSP), October 1997, pp. 52–65.

M. Seltzer, Y. Endo, C. Small and K. Smith, "Dealing with Disaster: Surviving Misbehaved Kernel Extensions," Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Operating System Design and Implementation (OSDI) , October 1996.
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] IronReaver17:
Whoa O__O 10chars