yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] alzaq:
I have used the following command to get the proprietary files (from the device/crespo)

./extract-files.sh

I have got the following

744 KB/s (300352 bytes in 0.393s)

remote object '/system/vendor/lib/egl/libEGL_POWERVR_SGX540_120.so' does not exist

remote object '/system/vendor/lib/egl/libGLESv1_CM_POWERVR_SGX540_120.so' does not exist

remote object '/system/vendor/lib/egl/libGLESv2_POWERVR_SGX540_120.so' does not exist

remote object '/system/vendor/lib/hw/gps.s5pc110.so' does not exist

remote object '/system/vendor/lib/hw/gralloc.s5pc110.so' does not exist

remote object '/system/vendor/lib/libakm.so' does not exist

remote object '/system/vendor/lib/libglslcompiler.so' does not exist

remote object '/system/vendor/lib/libIMGegl.so' does not exist

remote object '/system/vendor/lib/libpvr2d.so' does not exist

remote object '/system/vendor/lib/libpvrANDROID_WSEGL.so' does not exist

remote object '/system/vendor/lib/libPVRScopeServices.so' does not exist

remote object '/system/vendor/lib/libsec-ril.so' does not exist

remote object '/system/vendor/lib/libsrv_init.so' does not exist

remote object '/system/vendor/lib/libsrv_um.so' does not exist

remote object '/system/vendor/lib/libusc.so' does not exist

husam@ubuntu:~/WORKING_DIRECTORY/device/samsung/crespo$

which means the proprietary files does not existed.

any idea?
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] burakgon:
Grab from cm?
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] alzaq:
I have solved a part of the problem by changing the extract-files.sh

most of these not existed files are stored in different directories and the extract-files.sh provied the wrong path. I have found that the /system/vendor/lib/... points to false directory and I have corrected it to /system/lib/...
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] alzaq:
another solution can be as follows

install the orignal CM7 from thier website

the perform the same command ./extract-files.sh
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Kaik541:
a smart user would have noticed in this part of the instructions: http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/wiki/Sa...le_CyanogenMod_(Linux)#Copy_proprietary_files

where it clearly states you must *already* be running CM7 to use the command as it is.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] ZaIINN:
Updated 1/17/2012

- Busy with college work until 1/20/2012, then I'll update benchmarks

- Benchmarks now much more accurate.

- Planning on including AnTutu Benchmark results​

! In the midst of running benchmarks, check back later for a more details !

Okay, so the Samsung Galaxy Player 5 is now supported with Tegrak's overclocking application!

__________________________________________________________________________

ADJUSTING THE CPU CAN "POTENTIALLY" BE DANGEROUS. PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU KNOW WHAT YOUR DOING BEFORE TESTING ANY CLOCKS HIGHER THAN THOSE CONFIRMED BY MYSELF OR OTHER MEMBERS. I AM NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ISSUES THAT OCCUR DUE TO OVERCLOCKING.

Read below to see what's been tested along with some benchmarks + info on each test! If you have any information you'd like to share, let me know and I'll edit it into this post!

Thanks and happy overclocking! Push it to the limit!

__________________________________________________________________________

Tested Clock Frequencies so far...

[1.0GHz] - Stable (It's stock)

~ Average Q-Score: 1445.2 (Out of 5 tests) {Known to flucuate from 1400-1600}

~ AnTuTu score: 3064 (one test so far)

[1.1GHz] - Stable

~ Average Q-Score: 1593.2

~ AnTuTu score: 3192 (one test so far)

~ Significant battery life reduction? : Untested, post if you have tested this!

~ Any noticable issues come up? : Not yet, post if you have had one!

[1.2GHz] - Stable

~ Average Q-score: 1761.5 (Thanks to Meticulus)

~ Significant battery life reduction? : Untested, post if you have tested this!

~ Any noticable issues come up? : None so far, post if you have had any!

[1.3GHz] - Stable (Haven't tested for a long period of time though)

~ Average Q-score: 1856.7 (Thanks to Meticulus)

[1.4GHz] - Seemed Stable (Haven't tested for a long period of time)

[1.5GHz] - Seemed Stable (Only spent about 5min at this frequency)

~ AnTuTu score: 3713

[1.6GHz+] - Haven't tested yet.

GOING TO UPDATE THIS WITH MORE ACCURATE INFORMATION:: Please check back later!

1.0GHz [Stock] - 1.275V

- Average Quadrant: 1445.2

AVERAGE:

_____________________________________________________________________

IF YOU TRY OTHERS: Please let me know so I can update this post!

~ Zane
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] iJimaniac:
Well, been messing with it a little with my 4.0 U.S version, and I really don't feel good about going over 1.2 ghz, but it is cool. I would like to know how this thing scores so much higher with quadrant than the original galaxy s, even without overclock, weird. The biggest problem I experience with this is the stupid lack of ram! It is supposed to have 512, witch would be okay, but for some stupid reason it only has 300 something! Really, this thing doesn't need ovrclock, it needs more ram.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Meticulus:
Here is the link to tegrak's guide to overclocking...

translate.google.com/translate?&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fpspmaster.tistory.com%2F98
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] klin1344:
It's strange, I can get around 1400 in quadrant without overclocking. How come your scores are so low?
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] tapioco2000:
great news!

I really need overclock!

Just bought ultimate version, soon I'll test it!
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Wheatly:
You have pretty low scores on Quadrant, I get 1400 stock and 2000+ at 1.3 ghz. I want to know if there is a point to overclock because I am fine with stock speed, fasters speeds would be better but it looks like the cons outweigh the pros on overclocking.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] ZaIINN:
<user removed this post due to old info>
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Meticulus:
Quadrant testing using Tegrak Overclock Ultimate.

Notes:

1. Player is rooted

2. Chainfire3D pro installed but default settings are in place.

3. Model: US YP-G70CWY/XAA

4. Mhz and voltage changes are made after a reboot.

5. Quadrant Standard Edition Version 1.1.7 Revision 1518

6. SetCPU used to verify speed.

7. Scaling = ondemand.

8. Tegrak Overclock Ultimate 0.9.1

Stock: 1ghz (1275v) - Best: 1676 | Average: 1589.3

1. 1301

2. 1436

3. 1590

4. 1665

5. 1583

6. 1657

7. 1676

8. 1665

9. 1656

10. 1664

1.1 ghz (1275v) Best: 1784 | Average: 1693.9

1. 1387

2. 1596

3. 1646

4. 1758

5. 1772

6. 1760

7. 1711

8. 1753

9. 1772

10.1784

1.2 ghz (1275v) Best: 1910 | Average: 1761.5

1. 1504

2. 1670

3. 1855

4. 1864

5. 1869

6. 1686

7. 1910

8. 1769

9. 1752

10.1736

1.3 ghz (1275v) Best: 1966 | Average: 1856.7

1. 1561

2. 1701

3. 1720

4. 1963

5. 1894

6. 1949

7. 1966

8. 1965

9. 1961

10.1887

So that's my test. I'm going to try out higher speeds later. Let me know if you are getting significantly more or less. Please note any programs you may be using that may be influencing the results.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Meticulus:
I have not tested it but doesn't SuperOneClick 2.2 (or later?) have Unroot button?
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] cramblda:
If you used supeoneclick, it has an un-root option. The others may as well, I haven't checked.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] tapioco2000:
Don't return the device, i have results similar to you (about 1400 with 1,2 clock).

It may depends on backgrounding apps or something else, the important fact is that device is faster with overclock.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] ZaIINN:
Er I meant return it for a new one haha, I'm still under the return thing until Jan 21st (or so) with Bestbuy. And if others are getting 1400 stock and near 2000 oc'd, I'd assume there is something wrong with the hardware =( I just hope that kind of thing will work with the "Geek Squad" or if they'll just laugh at me.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] tapioco2000:
I've understood, quadrant is not Bible, it give just indications.

Now i'm testing 1.3 Ghz and 1.375 V (so overvolt) , very fast and no freezes.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] GalaxySwifi4.0:
Does it work with my french SGS wifi 4.0?
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] GalaxySwifi4.0:
I've just tried : yes, it works. :)

1524 : my first Quadrant with 1152 MHz. :)
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] tcb4:
wow

I had mine up to 1.5ghz... Ran smooth but obly had it thre for like 10 minutes... Ran like tow benches. 1st was 1997 second was 2019. It didnt heat up or anything, but i would prefer not to burn out my chip. Only reason I went so high is because the galaxy s has been clocked to 1.6 .

I think at 1.5 i could max at 2200-2300 with the stock rom. I got 1400 stock... Yp-g70
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] rumirand:
Well, here is some undervolting results I got:

Mhz - CPU volt - Internal volt

- 100mhz 750 mv 770 mv

- 200mhz 780 mv 870 mv

- 400mhz 870 mv 870 mv

- 800mhz 1020 mv 940 mv

- 1000mhz 1090 mv 940 mv

Maybe this values are useful for someone.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] ZaIINN:
I tried 1.5GHz and it seemed to make the Android notification bar lag, what did you change your voltages to?

* Double post, idk how to delete it >_>
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] ZaIINN:
I tried mine @ 1.5GHz, but it seemed make the Android notification pull-down bar lag, what did you set your voltages to?
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] WT Ho:
Are you using Froyo or GB? I recall that my YP-G70's benchmark score became lower after upgrading to GB.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] maxq1:
thanks for this, bro! oc'd mine to 1.2ghz & just replaced entry for 1ghz: 1275mv & 1100mv; lazy governor via your kernel. device is snappy as hell and lasts eons! i don't think pushing it to 1.3ghz is advisable though as performance bump is not that worth it compared to 1.2. just my 2 centavos though...
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] ZaIINN:
Updating the 1st post with more accurate information over the course of today, adding Antutu benchmark results as well.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Antarctica32:
this is what i get on quadrant standard.

I promise none of this is fake, although a couple of my benches look fake compared to that first post. I ran no programs in the background except for a notification widget that tells me the battery level, cpu temp, and weather. I have chainfire3d installed but its not in use. I am also running 2.3.5.

1 GHz Best- 1708 average- 1605.7

1. 1481

2. 1639

3. 1708 (that's really high, right? just want to make sure cuz I haven't slept in a while)

4. 1566 (thats a little better)

5. 1577

6. 1505

7. 1683

8. 1669

9. 1574

10. 1655

1.052 GHz best- 1808 average- 1694.5

1. 1615

2. 1719

3. 1629

4. 1683

5. 1714

6. 1639

7. 1736

8. 1658

9. 1744

10. 1808 (i swear im not making this up)

1.1 GHz best- 1798 average- 1742.9

1. 1687

2. 1798

3. 1751

4. 1722

5. 1756

6. 1781

7. 1782

8. 1709

9. 1788

10. 1655 what happened? lol

1.15 GHz best- 1767 average- 1653.3

1. 1660

2. 1403

3. 1576

4. 1655

5. 1765

6. 1749

7. 1767

8. 1658

9. 1691

10. 1609

1.2GHz best- 1928 average- 1885.8

1. 1925 WOW!

2. 1842

3. 1851

4. 1874

5. 1877

6. 1817

7. 1928 new best

8. 1905

9. 1921

10. 1918

I'm afraid of going any farther than that. Is anybody getting any benches like this? If I'm the only one that would be cool. You guys must be running something in the background. This is very interesting.

edit: i am also using the US version with only 377 RAM and is the YP-G70.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] ZaIINN:
I don't doubt it, Quadrant can vary, but in some cases its fairly accurate. Try downloading AnTuTu and seeing what you get at those frequencies.

I'll add your results to the first post when I've got time! =)

Oh and 1.3GHz seems fairly stable. I haven't had an issue with it at all. The only frequency that made Android hiccup a bit for me was 1.5GHz with the notification bar acting up a bit, but that only seemed to happen once. The 2nd time I tried it it worked okay.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Antarctica32:
OK, I have had antutu installed, but never used it. I first did a 1ghz full test on the whole thing including SD card and what not and got 2912.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Antarctica32:
check out this graph i made.

How should i continue doing the antutu benches? my sd card sucks so that might bring it down.

edit: attachment removed because it was not the right file, check out the new file
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] ZaIINN:
Okay, that seems to fit with what I got @ 1GHz : 3064; Fluctuation is expected, but a general trend should show through tests at different frequencies.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Antarctica32:
How should i continue doing the antutu benches? my sd card sucks so that might bring it down.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Antarctica32:
how did you get it to 1.5GHz? Tegrak only goes up to 1.3GHz

ok now Im going to run quadrant at 2.5 and 3GHZ.

1.25GHz best- 1945 average- 1884.9 (that 1737 killed it)

1. 1921

2. 1902

3. 1800

4. 1909

5. 1943

6. 1737

7. 1930

8. 1945

9. 1912

10. 1850

1.3GHz best- 2010 average- 1913.9

1. 1925

2. 1997

3. 1929

4. 1915

5. 1659 (well there goes my average)

6. 1884

7. 1991

8. 1863

9. 1966

10. 2010
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] ZaIINN:
The paid version of Tegrak allows up to 2GHz with adjustable voltage. 1.3GHz is the MAX for the FREE version.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Qwerty9736:
Does voodoo lagfix help at all? ive heard that it works on samsung devices but I dont know if it supports the galaxy players. anyone know if the us galaxy player 5.0 yp-g70 is supported?
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Antarctica32:
crap, that is the wrong document. here is a correct one:
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Antarctica32:
Here are some AnTuTu tests.

I am not running the default test!

I am running a custom test that doesn't have the SD card IO. That way it is more accurate from device to device.

1GHz best-2763 average-2749.6

1. 2720

2. 2757

3. 2749

4. 2759

5. 2763

1.05GHz best-2855 average-2828.4

1. 2819

2. 2815

3. 2816

4. 2855

5. 2837

1.1GHz best-2917 average-2892.2

1. 2897

2. 2887

3. 2898

4. 2862

5. 2917

1.15GHz best-2991 average-2956.4

1. 2960

2. 2937

3. 2991

4. 2940

5. 2954

1.2GHz best-3014 average-2995.4

1. 2968

2. 3002

3. 3004

4. 2989

5. 3014

1.25GHz best-3098 average-3097

1. 3098

2. 3096

1.3GHz best-3181 average-3158

1. 3181

2. 3135

anybody else getting similar results?

check out the graphs i uploaded. the first shows three separate players' results together and the other shows my antutu results.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] ZaIINN:
Very interesting, I'll do a few more tests tomorrow with AnTuTu without the SD card IO and post what I get. Thanks for posting your results!
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] tulice:
i just changed my system to ext4 and this is a result that i got.

Quadrand [Overclock at 1.2 Ghz]

i got 2529. (at 2nd test)

and Antutu Benchmark

i got 3434. (at first test)
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Se7enex:
Could you tell me how you changed it to ext4? :p

Also, I imagine anything over 1.2 GHZ wouldn't be worth it. I only use that speed if I'm playing a game that isn't natively supported. (GTAIII)
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] tulice:
[ROOT REQUIRE][GINGERBREAD 2.3.5 XXXKPF AND ZSKP8 ONLY]

[MORE THAN 12 MB FREE SPACE in /SYSTEM REQUIRE][u can check your free space by CF-ROOT ext4.]

1.install this custom kernel

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1414565

2.enter to CWM recovery

3.back up to internal sd and reboot

4.connect usb to pc and open internal sd -> clockworkmod -> backup -> xx.xx.xx [dd.mm.yy]

5.change .rts to ext4 [e.g. from data.rts.tar -> data.ext4.tar , system.rts -> system.ext4]

6.right click at "nandroid.md5" select open with notepad Edit it to match .ext4.tar files and save.

7. Download "root uninstall" from market and select "System App" and delete some stock apps for more free space [i deleted swipe and tw launcher, i got 28mb free space :rolleyes:]

8.enter to CWM recovery again

9.restore it and reboot

10. CONGRATULATION !

ps. sry for my poor english,bro :(

and i just test Quadrand again at 1.3 GHz, i got 2802. :)
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Se7enex:
That sounds terrifying lol. Not too mention I already have a custom kernel :(

Is ext4 supposed to be faster? I heard it is glitchy.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] tulice:
maybe, the different between rts and ext4 is speed performance on disk, not sure.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Antarctica32:
ext4? as in the filesystem for pure linux distros like ubuntu and fedora? that doesn't sound safe for an offshoot of linux like android. does it really make it that much faster? those scores are higher than the galaxy s 2.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] tulice:
In Galaxy S2 is also using ext4 because sammy found that RTS file system is a problem (Lagfix in Galaxy S and Galaxy Player)

and approximately score for Galaxy S2 is 31xx^ with stock rom
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Antarctica32:
ok weather or not the ext4 is safe, can anyone post the results of the antutu test without the sd card. My guess is that it will show that my device is just as good as the others. I bet quadrant is wrong.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] rumirand:
It is safer and faster. One of the reasons is because it has proper journaling. RFS is only FAT with POSIX attributes and some kind of journaling.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] :
Confirmed, just made the switch to ext4 with Entrophy's Daily Driver ( recommended name change "Operation Cowboy Lightning" LOL ;)) and got 2663 @ 1.3ghz in Quadrand standard; sdcard inserted.

Thanks Entrophy!
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Antarctica32:
how safe would it be to always run it at 1.05GHz? Should I adjust he voltage in any way at any clock speed?
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] ZaIINN:
Hmm, I think I'll do that as well. That's quite the performance boost lol didn't realize the file system was holding the SGP back so much!

I'm not too sure of the Clock-to-Voltage ratio, but I don't think it needs adjusted at 1.0-1.3GHz, considering the free version of Tegrak allows those without any kind of voltage changes, while enabling it in the pro version if your willing to go past 1.3GHz.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Antarctica32:
yeh but I mean just how long is it safe to go at 1.05GHz? I have relatively low experience with this so any answer at all would be great.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] kekx:
Mine runs at 1.5GHz (1,3V) for almost 3 days now. No freezes/errors yet
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Antarctica32:
do you mean 1.05GHz? 1.5GHz for 3 days is a little extreme. not sure if that could damage you SGP, but something like that on a computer could kill it.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] exodus454:
I've been running 1.5ghz for over 24 hours now without issue. The system is super snappy and I'm at the stock voltage.

Are there any temp monitors that work on the SGP? Everything I've tried can't find hardware sensors for the CPU, only battery.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Antarctica32:
check out the battery solo widget. it displays the batery percentage and if you tap it it shows you the temp. I also found a touchwiz bug that involves that widget:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nimkMfhaz5w&feature=email&email=comment_received

the SGP doesnt have a CPU thermometer, but does have one for the battery.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] noisyfox:
I don't think that we need overclock to high. 1.2GHz is good for most games.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] exodus454:
1.3ghz+ seems to make the system really snappy though.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] exodus454:
SGP didn't like rebooting at 1.5ghz.. everything crashed as soon as it reenabled the OC at boot. Currently at 1.4ghz without issue.

Also as a side note, knocking the voltage down at idle (100mhz @ 800ma) seems to save some battery life.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Antarctica32:
Would anybody care to run the Antutu tests (without sd card test) like I did so I can compare. You don't have to do more than 1 test at each clock speed, 1 is enough. I just want to get a general idea.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] marcusmarcus:
Here are my test results with Antutu without the sd card test.

1GHz = 2887

1.1GHz = 3027

1.2GHz = 3172

1.3GHz = 3349

1.4GHz = 3504

1.5GHz locked up my device so I could not test that

I have my file system changed to ext4. I did not run the tests before I change the file system so I can't tell you if it changed the results

EDIT: Just changed back to RTS file system and ran the tests again. It does not seem to make a difference in benchmarks as the results are so close.

Results with RTS file system:

1GHz = 2858

1.1GHz = 3057

1.2GHz = 3180

1.3GHz = 3320

1.4GHz = 3449
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] Antarctica32:
OK, so quadrant says mine is faster, but antutu says mine is slower. I wonder why? We all know that benchmarks like these are terribly inaccurate, but with this consistanncy? on the same device? how strange.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] lesikklas:
My results in Quadrant Standard Version:

1.0GHz(without overclock) - 1856

1.3Ghz - 2778(best); ~2600 - usually

I dont know why your results are so small..:p
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] kesongpinoy:
has anyone here tried undervolting for 1.2 GHz? do you have some stable values for voltages? :)
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] marcusmarcus:
I undervolted mine at 1.2GHz to 1200mV and it is running stable, have not tried to go lower on the voltage at that speed. I am using SetCPU with rj12 kernel to overclock and undervolt mine though. I found using Tegrak made my system to unstable even after adjusting the voltages every which way.
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] kesongpinoy:
thanks for the reply, also using rj kernel. yeah, tegrak is not needed any longer since the kernel already supports OC and UV, and it messes up setCPU's settings
[Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0] DZonikg:
I overclock it to 1.3ghz and all test show huge difference from 1.0 like super pi 64k calculation drops from 102 seconds to 61 ..all other cpy test show same difference..that is much more then 30%.
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] iamdestruktor:
Recently I've noticed my wifi doesn't connect to any of my normal networks. When I check my wireless setttings, it'll say "connecting" but not to any specific network. Then just says disconnected. Finally, it'll say out of range for all my networks. I haven't done anything major with my phone, just small things like downloaded GO Launcher and played with icons and themes. Any ideas on what I can try or what it might be? Thanks.

Sent via Tapatalk on my *voided* Evo running CM 7.1.0
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] marcusva79:
Are you using any kernels? Have you resented your router?
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] iamdestruktor:
I'm currently using the Tiamat-sbc kernel. But I'm pretty sure I haven't touched that kernel because it was working fine a while back. As for the router, it can't be a router problem. I have issues connecting to other networks as well. Should I clear my delvik cache?

Sent via Tapatalk on my *voided* Evo running CM 7.1.0
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jwhitney83:
I am having this very same problem. For the longest time I was sharing my internet connection from my iMac(mac acts as hot spot). But recently purchased a real wireless router. The problem is my phone connects for awhile then it quits working, it shows its still connected. But doesn't work. I am running Cyanogen mod 7 nightly latest with stock kernel. Anyone have a fix for this? I am thinking about re-flashing the radios.

Thank You
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] nrm5110:
How soon does it disconnect immediately, screen off, after 5 mins, we need details in order to assist you
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jwhitney83:
It is random. I could be browsing the internet and click on a link and it just sits there. Other times I could use it upwards of an hour without problems.
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] nrm5110:
On the same network??? Sorry I'm just trying to help and get a gauge of the issue