yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mmmcfc:
Not all chips are made to the same quality. They only have to reach a certain clock speed to pass quality checks. Certain devices can be overclocked due to being of higher quality.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Cr0nFixXx!:
Yes but the default clock of the ACE is 800Mhz right? But MY default clock is 600Mhz.

I dont have any options to overclock only from 124Mhz - 600Mhz.

The default clock of 800Mhz would be ok for me..
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kevinlekiller:
You sure its a ace? Galaxy fit / mini & 551 / europa are 600mhz MSM7227 vs 800mhz MSM7227-t 800mhz galaxy gio / ace.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Cr0nFixXx!:
Yes! Its definitely a ACE i have the Samsung box here .. and there are a big label Galaxy ACE "800Mhz CPU"
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] GerasVille:
Which rom are you using? Did you have the same problem on stock rom?
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kevinlekiller:
Do you have setcpu, if you do go on Info ; CPU what does it say ; Cpu Part / Cpu Revision / Hardware / Revision ?
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] xdaboy122:
If problem presist then go to Samsung service centre and change your phone dude
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Cr0nFixXx!:
Yes the problems are also on stock rom.

I have the costoum rom "CyanogenMod 7.1-cooper-KANG-RC1 Android 2.3.7" with OC-Kernel

Here are some Screenshots
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ReaperXL2:
Hi @Cr0nFixXx!...:D

It would seem to me that your problem is your Kernel... The details in your first thumbnail show the kernel to be that of a different dev to @Ketut...!!! Your OC Kernel details should read as this : 2.6.35.7-perf-CL562111 ketut@ketut-lenovo#4

The frequencies of the Cpu are governed solely by the kernel, so this is without a doubt your limiting factor...

The below kernel is tried & tested by thousands of users & is stable under OC...(check my sig for details)...

You can download this kernel from my dropbox here : http://dl.dropbox.com/u/44779766/cm-7.1-oc-kernel-2.6.35.7-perf-CL562111.zip

Flash this kernel from CWM recovery... Reboot phone, go to cyanogen setting/Performance & you should get the full cpu range for OC...

To see stable max OC set governor to "Performance"... Remember, only increase cpu frequency a little at a time & test for stability before increasing further...

Only when you have found your max stable clock speed can you tick "set on boot"...

FYI : OC kernels can only be used with custom roms... They will not work with stock roms... @Ketut's OC kernel will only work with CM7.1 / 7.2 Roms... Do not try with any other rom...

Stay Breezy n Be Lucky...:p

Pe"ACE"...:cool:
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Cr0nFixXx!:
Thanks for your help but .. same problem :(

I even cant get it to 800Mhz Default Clock :mad:
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ReaperXL2:
Hey Dude...:D

This is a very strange problem indeed... The Armv6 cpu is standard 600mhz cpu but samsung factory OC it when it is used in our aces... so we end up with an end-user frequency of 806mhz... Yours won't even reach that out of the box...?

Do me a favour... Flash this rom here : http://dl.dropbox.com/u/44779766/IceCreamSundayFinal_Tweaked.zip

It is IceCreamSunday Final by @Jusada... It is considered the fastest & most stable rom available on XDA & the OC kernel is inclusive of the rom...

Once flashed, go to cyanogenmod settings, performance, cpu & tell me what frequencies you get offered...?

FYI : It doesn't matter what your baseband or firmware version is... Ensure that you are using CWM 5 to flash with... Also ensure that before flashing you do a full system, cache, data, Dalvik wipe to ensure a clean flash... This rom is 7.2 btw...

Stay Breezy n Be Lucky...:p

Pe"ACE"...:cool:
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Cr0nFixXx!:
I dont know whats my phones problem but it dont worked for me -.- even max. 600Mhz...

But great thanks for your help! :)
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Doo:DAce:
LoL the first thing that entered my mind is "maybe samsung forgot to overclock" my suggestion is go to samsung and tell them to overclock that.. or simply say it's defective ;)
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] madman:
approach samsung and get new phone..
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] LazySam:
man if it showing 600 dont overclock

as overclock can damage your cell

be happy with what you are having
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] madman:
but he should get 800 which he paid for :p
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Doo:DAce:
hey wait isnt ace's cpu like the 600mhz ones but only OC'ed to 800?
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] CallMeVentus:
I'm done explaining
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] thedisturbedone:
A fault with the processor probably.. ARMv6 anyway has 600Mhz by default and Ace has been factory overclocked to 800Mhz.. which is the simple reason why each Ace is so different and has so many problems regarding battery life. Overclocking is a delicate procedure..

To the point:

Just take it to the service center to get what you paid for!
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Lorubik:
mmmh.. Can be a setcpu Bug? try install another app or reinstall Setcpu
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] CallMeVentus:
Are you sure you're using a Galaxy Ace ?

If he used a different kernel for other Galaxy devices the phone shouldn't boot .
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dragonnn:
CPU in Galaxy Ace is not overclocked by Samsung!! It's is an original cpu from Qualcomm, but he have made first a 600Mhz an the decided to make 800Mhz on the same core, but that isn't overclock! Cr0nFixXx! and think you have became on Ace with the lower CPU from factory, it can by that he had mistake by selecting the CPU for Ace. Go to the service center and tell that him.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] DelgerN:
help same problem default clock 600 mhz /MSM7227 turbo/
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dredremon:
go to samsung center dude reback on froyo build couz samsung doent fix a custom rom.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] CallMeVentus:
Device model ?

Sent from a Samsung Galaxy Ace
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ROMFlasherAce:
Hmmm......I like downclocking my Ace to 600MHz anyway :p

Go to the service centre or.......

Enjoy the extra battery life lol
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] DelgerN:
Galaxy Ace GT-S5830
[Samsung Infuse 4G] tmease1:
Does any know if there is way to change the build prop on the stock rooted KL2 so that you can get any apps off of the market? For some reason when I search certain apps they don't show up.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997
[Samsung Infuse 4G] dman3285:
Because some apps are builrmt with a target sdk version in their manifest....so that phones with lesser firmware(that can't run the app)can't download or buy it for nothing
[Samsung Infuse 4G] dman3285:
Edit...built
[Samsung Infuse 4G] tmease1:
I've tried everything. I did some research and on other phones people have edited the build prop. I was curious to see if anyone with the infuse had figured this out yet. There are a ton of apps this phone will handle that we can't get.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997
[Samsung Infuse 4G] dman3285:
I know how..but why would you download an app that you can't use???
[Samsung Infuse 4G] dman3285:
That's why we put an sdk target version in the manifest...just for that reason bro
[Samsung Infuse 4G] tmease1:
Because I know for a fact that some of the apps I'm looking for work on this phone and I can't buy them in the market.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997
[Samsung Infuse 4G] dman3285:
Well if your running 2.3.6 android version..just about all apps are available
[Samsung Infuse 4G] tmease1:
It must be something in how i got it set up then. I'll flash the KL2 leak and see what happens.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997
[Samsung Infuse 4G] tmease1:
The problem is with the new market. I went back to the old market and everything is fine.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] ncguy68:
While setting up Go Launcher EX I hid the status bar...now that it is hidden I can't bring up the preferences menu to restore the status bar. How do I bring back the status bar or how do I get back to Go Launchers Preferences Menu?

Thanks, William
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] liquidzoo:
Button Savior will do that. It's available in the Market if you're rooted.
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] skyward01:
I did this aswell, had to clear data to get it back. Then restored my backup so I didn't have resetup my home screens.

Sent from my rooted Nook Tablet.
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] ncguy68:
Thanks. :-) Clearing the data worked.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] wakers:
Has anyone on here had any problems with there SGS 2 and people not being able to hear you on a call ?

I got my daughter an SGS 2 for xmas and its all fine other than people can't hear her when she makes a call, if she puts the phone on loudspeaker then you can hear her...

Its a vodafone branded SGS 2 and we've checked and applied updates so its on android 2.3.5 but that didn't make any difference...

I've also this evening rooted the phone and tried a few different Kernels and custom roms and the problem persists with all, sounds like it could be a hardware fault but a few people i've found doing google searches seem to have had an issue but none so far that i've found have posted on if its been resolved or not...

Thanks for any help...
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] andreimazz:
try to disable noise cancellation while on a call.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] bramandroid:
That works for me too. I am searching for a better and perminant solution without bringing the phone to a service center. Using a bluetooth earpiece works for me as well.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Digital_G0D:
I just backed up all apps and system data using the free version of Titanium Backup. It stored to the default location: /mnt/sdcard/TitaniumBackup

Now, when I connect with usb to my laptop and browse that folder it is empty, contains 0 files 0 bytes. I can browse both on my phone and through my laptop using adb shell and it shows the files are there in the folder, but folder shows empty through USB.

I would really like to have a backup of everything on my laptop, please help. I just finished searching for half an hour and found nothing.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] oilfighter:
I got the same problem on Mac (using the Android File Transfer)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] thebrightside:
i had the same problem using windows. i just disconnected the phone and tried again ~30 mins later and for some reason i could see the files. this has happened a couple times to me and each time if i'm just patient, the files will eventually show up. not sure why this is happening though...

---------- Post added at 03:00 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:51 AM ----------

maybe try restarting your phone as well
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Digital_G0D:
Solved

Just tried re-connecting the phone and that worked, strange. I can see all the files now and pull them off, thanks a bunch!
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] blastboi:
it works with international gs2, is ours too diferrent?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3F0FysH05GU
[Windows Phone 7 General] jason1175:
wmpoweruser.com recently posted the following article:

http://wmpoweruser.com/verizon-was-in-the-running-for-a-lte-windows-phone-but-turned-it-down/

Basically, the rumor is that Verizon has rejected LTE Windows Phones until at least the end of 2012 as well as any high-end Windows Phones..

???

Am I the only person who finds this very aggravating?
[Windows Phone 7 General] Alcoholic:
This probably isn't true
[Windows Phone 7 General] hunterjackson92:
What I heard was that Microsoft was having trouble making an lte phone
[Windows Phone 7 General] LoganNowak:
Can't be that, because AT&T is getting LTE phones in March, which means they are very likely already done and just undergoing testing now.
[Windows Phone 7 General] ohgood:
december, january, february, march-ISH

thats a looooong way off still in att time. given how eta dates tend to slip, well, you know.

(supposedly) Verizon asked microsoft for a roadmap, microsoft said 'meh'. You can't expect big red to commit to a marketing campaign for wp LTE devices, without a roadmap.

as awesome as LTE is, hopefully batteries will have a breakthrough before it's considered standard practice to be connected to that kind of connection all day long. ouch !
[Windows Phone 7 General] jason1175:
Well, to be clear, it's not just LTE phones but also any high-end Windows Phones. So it appears that Verizon blatantly does not want to support them. This is aggravating because I feel that Verizon has a responsibility to the consumers, not just their bottom line. Much of Android's success has been a result of Verizon's Droid campaign. Not to mention just about every phone in the Verizon store is an Android phone. So it would seem that Verizon is so far invested in Android that they will not welcome competition. This is what I find ridiculous.

If this is not the case then why only 1 Windows Phone(for which I own btw)? Would it be so bad to offer at least 2 options, one low-end and one high-end? This would allow both Microsoft and Verizon to gauge any potential success. With just one option compared to the multitude of options from Android, it just seems unfair.

I'm not looking to start an Android vs. WP7 flame war as I actually think they are both cool. My intent is to bring attention to and discuss the ridiculous way Verizon is handling the situation.
[Windows Phone 7 General] Alcoholic:
yea which makes me wonder if Nokia and MSFT perfected the battery life problem. A lot of companies are waiting for a new chip that better hndles lte radio.
[Windows Phone 7 General] ohgood:
i don't think Verizon dislikes wp, i think they don't have faith that the wp devices will be profitable (sell) in numbers to justify the outlay. Verizon likely has access to htc, samsung, nokia, and other phone hardware makers that might hint of what the actual sales numbers are, whereas microsoft isn't publishing them (to us). If Verizon thought they could make a killing, you should believe they'd be doing it.

Verizon loves the -profits- they make from android / iphone contracts, but would likely care less what OS was actually selling, so long as they (big V) was the one reaping the profits.

Give the ms roadmap (whatever it is) some time.
[Windows Phone 7 General] prohibido_por_la_ley:
Don't know y they're hyping LTE so badly, just so they can overage people like crazy, especially with that NFL app that streams games in HD. Oooo weeee. Verizon SUCKS!!!
[Windows Phone 7 General] jason1175:
But that's just it. It's a sort of catch-22. Verizon is arguably the largest carrier in the US and only provides a single WP7 option. You walk into a Verizon store looking for a new phone and you're immediately pointed to an Android powered phone. Ask an employee about a Windows Phone and they immediately say "it's not good" or "i don't know enough...but this Droid...".

So how would you see WP7 as profitable when this is what's happening? As I said previously, maybe just adding a couple more options would help. Why not have a low-mid-high end option set? Educate employees and have them offer it to consumers as a viable option.

Why not?
[Windows Phone 7 General] jason1175:
The same reason they push their Android phones so hard, they have a huge investment in it.
[Windows Phone 7 General] ohgood:
Maybe wp7 has stigma already... I dunno. The re-education of salesfloor staff would cost money, and it would be ongoing given the turnover rate. <--- maybe why

There are so many catch22's dealing with new products of any kind. Apple has the mindshare that will buy -just- because its the new model, on whichever carrier has it. Verizon is enjoying the contracts the iphone brought, along with the benefits of a couple of "droid does" splashed across screens during football games.

Microsofts ads may be too far above the intellect of consumers to register ?

Lots of questions. Good ones.
[Windows Phone 7 General] Alcoholic:
Because lte manages their network more efficiently and its cheaper because the lte towers are smarter. Can do a lot of things on the tower instead of sending data to HQ
[About XDA developers] boardsportsrule:
I saw the posting on the portal about switching off of GoDaddy, and first of all I want to say THANK YOU!

From all of us who don't have a website they can switch off of GoDaddy, we thank you. Putting your money in the pockets of companies you approve of is GREAT. I only wish I could do more to help.

The article did leave me wondering if you had your domain registered with them, or also used them as the host for all the content. After I pondered that, I wondered if there would be any outages due to the swap. I would certainly not complain if there were, I am just curious if there might be.

Again, thank you for doing this, I hope that large communities continue to pull their money from companies their members do not approve of.
[About XDA developers] Archer:
I would have seen it on my RSS reader at some point, but thanks boardsportsrule for posting this and bringing it to my attention. I've only got 1 domain registered with them, but I've just cancelled the auto-renew.

More people need to be made aware of the small things they can do that can make a large difference, together.
[About XDA developers] pulser_g2:
It is merely for domain registration. The site is not hosted on godaddy, and the actual dns resolving is done by xda servers.
[About XDA developers] boardsportsrule:
Happy I helped!

Gotcha, thanks for the information. I was secretly hoping it was fully hosted on GoDaddy. That'd be a blow to their wallet!
[About XDA developers] Archer:
I didn't need any further reason to end my custom with them, but if I'd have known that then I would have done it long ago.
[About XDA developers] F2504x4:
Golf Clap for XDA

Here is the statement from XDA, i hope many others will follow suit...

Website Update: We’re moving from GoDaddy

Posted December 29, 2011 at 4:30 pm by Russell Holly

Website Update: We’re moving from GoDaddy

As many of you may be aware, we here at XDA-Developers occasionally stand in support of our members. All of you feel that you can submit things on the forums, knowing that the information is appreciated, used, and shared. We have members all over the world, and we know that the rules aren’t always the same when it comes to what you are “legally” allowed to do. I think I can speak for a great many by saying that while our unified voices are strong, there is nothing stronger than action. In keeping with that, we have decided to move XDA-Developers away from GoDaddy entirely.

This won’t surprise many. GoDaddy’s original support of the Stop Online Piracy Act, followed by their frankly cowardly flip-flop when that stance showed unpopular was enough for the decision to be clear. If SOPA clears, The very existence of a site like XDA would be at risk. For the record, SOPA would allow:

The US Government to selectively censor the web based on requests made by organizations who disapproved of content

Deny the owners of a site due process of law by blacklisting a DNS based on just a claim of copyright infringement

Force sites like XDA to aggressively monitor and filter all content

Hold site owners accountable for everything users post, with consequences like jail time and heavy fines

If SOPA passes, XDA would be forced to switch to a review system, where the forum moderators would have to inspect and approve every post on every subforum. The result would seriously decrease activity on XDA, and it wouldn’t be very long after that we’d likely be forced to close our doors. Obviously this is a “worst case” scenario, but it doesn’t change the fact that this could be a reality if SOPA passes.

Over the next few days, we will be moving all XDA assets away from GoDaddy. In the mean time, we encourage you to head over to the EFF, where they have created a page for how you can do your part to oppose this legislation that would allow the US to firewall content from their own citizens.

---------- Post added at 07:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:00 PM ----------

found this from searching lol :eek:

Hello, SONY.

We are Anonymous.

It has come to the attention of the Anonymous activist community that you have chosen to stand by the Stop Online Piracy Act

http://www.cinemablend.com/games/Nintendo-Sony-Stop-Supporting-SOPA-Anonymous-Threats-38195.html
[About XDA developers] Deleted member 3820412:
I decided not to move my domains from godaddy. Reason being is that im letting those domains expire on them, so they take the cost of maintaining them. They aren't getting any more money from me.
[About XDA developers] Mephikun:
It's not /just/ the elephant for me, it's their SOPA support, too. Thank you, xda.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Vanhoud:
I was extremely paranoid about scratching my screen. However, I have the absolute worst luck when it comes to install a screen protector with NO bubbles. Im kinda OCD, and if i install a screen protector and there is even 1 single small bubble I have to throw it away and start over. After many failed attempts, I started looking for cases with screen protection built in. I ran across this case on Amazon...

http://www.amazon.com/SAMSUNG-PREMIUM-LEATHER-QUBITS-PACKAGING/dp/B0062VEF98/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1325196994&sr=8-1

At only $8.95 I thought this was a steal. Judging by the photos it looked like it could do the job of a screen protector and case just fine. In fact, it would probably protect the screen BETTER than just a regular screen protector in case it falls.

After using the case for a day now, I can say I am extremely pleased with it, especially since its so cheap :). Using the Gnex with this case actually feels more comfortable in my hands than without. Here is a run down:

PROS:

Feel more comfortable to hold.

Magnetic clip makes it easy to secure case.

Material feels great.

Really gives a sense of protection.

Phone feels really secure once placed inside.

You can use the extended battery (see images below).

Cons:

With the extended battery, the on button can be a little difficult to press

Can add a little too much bulk for some people.

Taking the phone out of the case can feel difficult. Try too hard and it will pop out so be prepared.

With extended battery, the device slightly rises above the plastic clip.

To sum it up, if you want a case that can also provide screen protection on the cheap, you should check this case out :)