yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[LG Revolution] RootedUser:
Ay hicks have u made any themes for the Max yet? Sorry I'm off subject here.
[LG Revolution] mattlwoo:
Thanks Hicks. I wasn't sure so I just went for it. Figured if it didn't I would start over. Thanks again.
[LG Revolution] spc_hicks09:
Lol that makes no sense at all. If you restore a nand backup, you're going to overwrite the files and have to flash it again.

To force your home launcher into memory, you need to open the build.prop and edit this line: ro.HOME_APP_ADJ=1

Make sure you have a "1" at the end.

It could simply be a coincidence but other people have reported that too so maybe this helps with that.

Not yet man but I'm itching to! Getting one in the works today but not sure how long it will take to make one.

Very welcome!
[LG Revolution] RootedUser:
sounds good let me know when ur finished
[LG Revolution] jamRwoo:
So, maybe this is causing the problem, maybe it isn't, but it certainly didn't seem to fix it. It seems to have made it worse but that's an entirely subjective analysis.

I get the whole, no touchscreen responsiveness A LOT and have to do the turn my screen off/on to fix it...So, how do I go about uninstall this so I can see if it's any better without it?

Thank ya.
[LG Revolution] spc_hicks09:
Sorry you're having issues! It could or could not be because of this tweak. To get rid of it, you just need to reflash the ROM you're currently on.
[LG Revolution] arcane spade:
anybody have this file? the link isn't working.
[LG Revolution] Mannn121:
http://db.tt/GAZgkWe6

First development post! :beer:
[LG Revolution] Bob_Bobber0:
link doesn't work. anyone have another download link?
[LG Revolution] capt730:
Here you go....

https://www.box.com/s/77fdz83a30avha3hzezi
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] akira02rex:
In lieu of all of these leaked ics roms from someone inside Samsung is this considered theft? And if we have this on our devices isn't there a chance we could potentially get in trouble if the right person were to find out?

With that said, xda does not support piracy because the software costs money and is given for free. The same goes with leaked roms that were stolen from samsung right? So xda mods, how can you support something like this and allow it on the forum? I'm neutral to this argument and would like your thoughts.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Miami_Son:
The "leaked ROMs" are technically made up of open source material, so there is no theft issue. As for the person leaking them, they may be subject to disciplinary action by their employer, but there is no illegality for having said ROM on your phone. Most of these supposed "leaked ROMs" are actually leaked on purpose by the manufacturer as a way to get the flashing community to do their R&D for free. We are only too willing to help them in that.:D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] brent8577:
haha yeah, samsung is just letting xda devs do some of the work!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Red5:
Its not theft per say. These are roms (or software if you will) that is build from free source code provided by Google and is made FOR OUR PHONES. They have to build several roms to make sure all the bugs are out. They send out these "leaked" roms to testing to find all the hidden (or non-obvious) bugs so they can fix them before the rom is considered gold (or stable, official). You know as well as I do that once something hits the internet it spreads like wildfire, so thats how they get out in the masses.

Since there is no price on the roms and they are built from free source code, XDA is not responsible for anything in this regard.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Entropy512:
The Apache license is a grey area in this regard. Similarly, the ICS leaks technically ARE GPL violations in that kernel source hasn't been included - however again it's a grey area since technically we're not supposed to have the binaries in the first place.

Also, I believe most leaks are not obtained by "theft", but by using an undocumented firmware update mode that lets the leaks be downloaded directly from Samsung's Kies update servers.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] akira02rex:
Hmm it just seems like that argument wouldn't hold up in a court of law? Its being taken no matter how you slice it. It was built using source but where's the intent to distribute? If there's no intent (yet) then they aren't obligated to release it based on gpl.

Thoughts?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] autonomous-inc:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1420996

Bam. Legal, official ROM. DONE.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Red5:
As Entropy said, its a grey area. I guess technically it is a violation of GPL due to source not being released with the leak, but then the leak isnt being documented as gold or official, so since its still in its "testing" phase, it dosent count (which is why all leaked roms are required to say that they are leaked testing roms, not official and to flash at your own risk... official dropped roms will say official). Now if somebody took a leaked build with no source and distributed it as gold or official, then yes that would not hold up and would be in direct violation and could be held accountable.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Entropy512:
No, not official, still a leak. The poster should not have used "Official" to describe a leak that happened to have a signed kernel.

Declaring that something is a test version does not permit you to withhold source code.

The main thing is that if you read the license, if you give the binary to someone, you are supposed to provide source. If you received a binary from someone with a written offer for source, you must pass on that written offer.

The problem is that Samsung is "providing" test versions to their testers - some people on XDA have just managed how to intercept this method of providing builds by polling Samsung's update servers, but NOT the method for intercepting the source or the source offer.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] autonomous-inc:
Buzzkill.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Red5:
I should have been more clear. I didnt mean that it permitted anyone to have without source code... but merely that Samsung does not have to provide it yet since it isnt official. By Samsung giving out a test build to test for bugs, they do not have to give out source code yet (mainly why they kept testing in house so its blanketed under the same company because the company does in fact have the source code from Google) until they release it outside the company.

And yes, just because some members intercept the leaked test builds, they were not handed to by Samsung which is why they do not have the source code in the first place. People here distribute it to other members but it is not attached here on XDA, they upload it to a share site and simply post the links here at XDA.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] wonner:
I work for the FBI and it is illegal. This is a bust and you're all under arrest. Post your addresses so we can come and arrest you. kthxbai
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Entropy512:
Yup - that's basically it. The people whom Samsung is actually "providing" these builds to most likely have source code access.

We don't have source because they didn't really "provide" us the leak.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] clor01:
How u do dat
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] rboone18:
I agree what a wasteful buzz kill post
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Red5:
Nobody asked you.

Who are you even responding too? What a wasteful post.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] zelendel:
OK guys this has gone on long enough. To respond to the OP. OEM have long allowed early builds to be leaked to XDA for bugging hunting and troubleshooting. Should do a little research before you start a thread like this.

Thread closed.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Red5:
Buzzkill...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] zelendel:
Yup
[Android Apps and Games] Mateusz Baclawski:
The application offers phenomenal graphics in two colors.

Widget is available in two sizes (1x1 and 2x2)

https://market.android.com/details?id=com.bacastudio.batterymeter
[Touch Viva, MDA Basic General] Main_Man:
Hi! Does anybody know how to change the colour or theme of the TouchFlo™ in HTC Touch Viva? I'm sick and tired of that blue colour.
[Touch Viva, MDA Basic General] lhnzh12:
M2DC

You have to install this program M2DC in order to change your theme, in the first post you will see manila skins where you can download themes. :) heres the link http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=427392
[Touch Viva, MDA Basic General] Dblaster:
Here's the link to the software for changing the skins:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=427392

And here's the link to Manila skins:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=425974

If u feel any problem, let us know.....
[Touch Viva, MDA Basic General] Main_Man:
HELP!

Thank you. You guys are Awesome. I have two problems. One of them is with my HTC Touch Viva. I have downloaded a Manila 2D file (Zip file) in my cellphone. When I open it, which file should I extract? (Explain step by step).

AND the other problem, I AM LAZY AS SHI*.

Please tell me step by step how to install it with skins. I loved the skins. Thanks in advance.
[Touch Viva, MDA Basic General] Dblaster:
After installing the m2dc, u downloaded the skins in zip files, right?

Now u don't need to extract the zip files, just put them in any folder of your phone and open m2dc. Select the theme from there and wait till the process completes.

Important: Before installing any theme, make sure that u backup your original theme.

Good Luck!!
[Android Apps and Games] Mateusz Baclawski:
The application offers phenomenal graphics.

Widget is available in two sizes (1x1 and 2x2)

The application contains advertising.

https://market.android.com/details?id=com.bacastudio.slider_battery
[EVO 4G Android Development] Blacked-Out-Cobra:
>>>Vanilla-Swirl-ICS-4.0.3<<<

I am a new developer learning ROM development

I have decided to take over where thebakeryoven stopped

this is based on 4.0.3

I take no credit for what thebakeryoven has done to this rom

>>>Features<<<

Market is integrated

added dalvik mods and some script edits

many small unseeable mods

Trebuchet Launcher (may be changed to Nova give me an opinion)

Downloads

for V2.5 PM me its a lot better

it has scripts from luciferri integrated

toggles

Better Dalvik optimization than 1.0

GAPPS

Read me first

on first boot it will give you two options choose setup

also the background will be messed up after you finish configuring google account

reboot and background will be fixed.

NOTE

even though it looks like google apps it doesnt install gapps

that is not allowed if you want you can download them for the market.

>>>What's Coming<<<

in later version the two options at first boot will be fixed. (will be in 2.0)

also more stability is coming in 2.0

USB-MS integrated in 2.0

better dalvik optimization in 2.0

Latest Trebuchet in 2.0

USB mount fix

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1389375

Not Working:

Camera

Wimax

4G

I overclock to 1075mhz and it runs really snappy

happy new year
[EVO 4G Android Development] MrDSL:
I wasn't aware the ICS google apps were downloadable from the market? I thought those were the older version?

I could be wrong though..
[EVO 4G Android Development] Blacked-Out-Cobra:
not sure about that either but they work.
[EVO 4G Android Development] MrDSL:
It would be nice to have a gapps zip to flash with this though as having the newer ICS gapps is one of the bonuses of running ICS alphas in the first place..Just a suggestion.
[EVO 4G Android Development] Blacked-Out-Cobra:
I will put upload gapps and link it on main post in a minute.

Link is up
[EVO 4G Android Development] storm68:
Not a big fan of nova, I like original.. Just a thought... Thanks for taking over... Great challenge! :)
[EVO 4G Android Development] Blacked-Out-Cobra:
thanks for the input on this that helps greatly feel free to give me any advice/suggestions at any time.
[EVO 4G Android Development] arcejefferson:
Does cam work on this
[EVO 4G Android Development] Blacked-Out-Cobra:
No should have added a list of not working sorry.

will add one.

waiting on someone to compile a driver

I am not that experienced yet.

if someone wants to compile one be my guest

I think someone is working on it though
[EVO 4G Android Development] guih:
I know Decks been working on camera. Is this still based off of Decks or is it independent now?
[EVO 4G Android Development] Blacked-Out-Cobra:
its based off thebakeryoven

which is based off of decks so yes.
[EVO 4G Android Development] Blacked-Out-Cobra:
Update

I have done endless work this morning 2.0 is almost ready.
[EVO 4G Android Development] The Batman:
Can't wait to test it out!
[EVO 4G Android Development] Blacked-Out-Cobra:
2.0 Update

It is finished right now when I get home tommorow I will upload it as soon as i get there.
[EVO 4G Android Development] asd87:
I'm running decks, which is great...with that said, what is the feedback on this?? And where are some screenshots? (Not trying to be pushy)
[EVO 4G Android Development] Mazda:
I'm getting ready to release my rom which is based off of yours which was based off of thebakeryoven which is based off of decks...hahahaha...I mean, how many times is decks work going to get ripped and turned into an "improved rom"....I mean, I could see if you were actually developing this BUT you're just editing the build.prop to make it your own and MAYBE adding or taking a few apps here and there BUT at the end of the day, you're not doing NOTHING....thebakeryoven didn't do anything and you most likely won't do anything but wait til either jaredthegreat or decks to do something so you can kang it.....JUST saying!...hahaha
[EVO 4G Android Development] sobaked2921:
So what made thebakeryoven drop work?????
[EVO 4G Android Development] Mazda:
His laptop broke and he decided to quit supporting that rom so he can learn first instead of kanging people's work left and right...
[EVO 4G Android Development] Blacked-Out-Cobra:
@mazdarider23

before you start saying anything on thebakeryoven or me get your facts straight build.prop wasnt the only thing "just edited" dalvik mods where added look for yourself also systemui.apk settings.apk and framework-res.apk where all decompiled edited and recompiled.

yes I understand that is not much I am not an experienced Developer but that is a lot more than just editing some text or build.props

I hope you do some better modding to this Rom but check the work before you go off saying things about thebakery or me.

this is the reason most developers are banning these projects.

and also I am not to proud to say Deck is a way better dev than me and is far more experienced.

and yes you may even be a better dev than me but you cant expect much from a single inexperienced dev

if you want to criticize take time out of your day to show us more!!!
[EVO 4G Android Development] Blacked-Out-Cobra:
visually wise it looks the same havent changed the actual look yet but market is integrated in and like I said in the main post dalvik mods are done and some other mods I listed to mazda rider

P.S. chevy stomps mazda any day all day ;)
[EVO 4G Android Development] Mazda:
Nah dude, we don't steal people's roms! We're above that kind of stuff!!

Why would you even think of doing something like that?
[EVO 4G Android Development] :
Dude I thought we broke you of that hahaha
[EVO 4G Android Development] KommodoreHeinz:
apparently not
[EVO 4G Android Development] theonebakery:
I was refering to how its all kanged and based off someone else, why not more?! Lmao
[EVO 4G Android Development] infamousteeboy:
At least you accepted/admitted that you kanged decks lol

TrevE Supporter!
[EVO 4G Android Development] dzee206:
isnt hi jacking his thread and running him out good enough?? not to mention the roasting going on lol
[EVO 4G Android Development] -EViL-KoNCEPTz-:
This rom should be called i-steal-ics

Sent from my iCS'd out EViL4G, soaking in a bowl of Ramen Noodles
[EVO 4G Android Development] KommodoreHeinz:
I spent all day creating you a new Team Logo. Hope you like it

---------- Post added at 08:37 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:36 PM ----------

I just have too...
[EVO 4G Android Development] theonebakery:
I never knew you were so artistic!

Sent from my Evo4G
[EVO 4G Android Development] dzee206:
hahaha +1 that sounds much more better
[EVO 4G Android Development] luciferii:
you cant steal opensource, tards.

if you remember the origins of team ramen it was a bunch of people that were so annoying they got the first ICS thread for the evo shut down.
[EVO 4G Android Development] -EViL-KoNCEPTz-:
U can steal open source code by not giving credit to the developers and then claiming it as your own. custom mods are not truly opensource when a single Dev spends their time creating it then someone else tries to take credit for it

Sent from my iCS'd out EViL4G, soaking in a bowl of Ramen Noodles
[EVO 4G Android Development] hotrodssnova:
Honestly, you guys sound like a bunch of little *****es crying over some lipstick some teeny bopper took from you. If you would put the effort into improving this board as you do trashingit, it would be so much better. Like stated above, its all open source, get over it. Move on...go figure out the camera drivers...do something constructive.

.......just saying........

Get real!

Blah
[EVO 4G Android Development] scottspa74:
Wow, I never thought I'd see a thread at xda devolve into such a deranged, juvenile circus. People that are grown generally have more restraint . And all android code is open source, so as long as credit is given, I dont see an issue.

But to read 15 pages of name calling and child-like, pathetic behavior, (not to mention NOT leaving someones thread if you dont use what they've played), is just sad.

I just can't believe what I've seen here, on xda (the bulk of it being team limp noodle) , obviously.

OP, do what you do. You will learn if you keep it up.

(Not to mention, many of the ROMs here are 'stolen' from htc , with tweaks many have made over the last 18mo by Virus, toast, aamikam, calk etc., ) combined/compiled into one flash able rom, and shared. Then built on further. ....it's all the SAME, DAMN , thing. )
[EVO 4G Android Development] dzee206:
its a little too late to be playing captain now. whats done is done get over it. open source or not, taking some one elses work claiming it as your own and not give credit for it is stealing.
[EVO 4G Android Development] Mazda:
Cool Story Bro!! How long did it take you to write all that down?? I bet you feel like a man now huh?..hahahaha
[EVO 4G Android Development] welshwarriorsf:
LOL. Can't disagree. Let the Guy do his thing and LEARN. Get a F'n life trollers/"devs".
[EVO 4G Android Development] Deputydroid:
+1 well said!
[EVO 4G Android Development] dzee206:
wow its funny how all of a sudden every one has to throw in their 2 cents and try to be captain save a hoe after its a little too late. if yall really had that devs back should of done it a while ago and plus this thread needed to be closed. hell he even said it, he wanted it closed before everything went down.
[EVO 4G Android Development] Mazda:
Ok first, I know the reason thebakery aka Andrew dropped support for this Rom. I know this because I talked to the dude just about everyday. Also, if you want to LEARN how to dev then why not LEARN by asking questions and reading and doing all the things that an inexperienced person like yourself would do if they had their head on right? You're going to learn how to dev by taking on a project that even the most talented developers are having trouble on???

Now dude, you can turn this into a forum internet pissing contest if you want so your buddies can all tell you how big your e-penis is BUT the truth of the matter is that you could of simply taken this and post your "tweaks" on decks thread and save us ONE more thread that's not going anywhere! First you take a CM7 rom, slap Launcherpro on it and post it as YOUR ROM..hahaha..NOW THIS?!...COME ON!!

If you want to learn a thing or two, PM and I'll be more then happy to but you know you're just gonna kang decks or jaredthegreat's work....you, me and everyone else knows you are!
[EVO 4G Android Development] Blacked-Out-Cobra:
I have posted any pm'd many devs never get an answer finally one dev "who isnt the most experienced tried to help me" and I appreciate him very much if you want to help me have at it. I would be extremly appreciated.

Like I said before. I take no credit for what anyone else has done to this ROM I gave you a list of what was modded.

I didnt put this ROM up to "complete" decks work just to add some small mods that increase performance I am sure when Deck releases another build my "little stuff will no longer be wanted or needed.

just figured if a dev seen I can actually do some stuff with ROMs they would chip in and help a new dev.
[EVO 4G Android Development] Mazda:
PM me dude...I'm done putting on a show for the trolls!
[EVO 4G Android Development] Blacked-Out-Cobra:
+1 for that
[EVO 4G Android Development] The Batman:
Come on version 2!
[EVO 4G Android Development] MrDSL:
Kanged or not go ahead and release 2.0. Nothing wrong with some variety.
[EVO 4G Android Development] ix3u:
I feel like this has to be a joke... Did the bakery guy really do anything other than change the launcher and add a couple of things that most non-devs could have done? It really seems like nothing useful has been added. At all.... Might just be my opinion, but seriously, stop saying you're a dev if you aren't. I when I saw lithid's post about "real deving" pop back up after you got ripped on in that cm7 rip off you posted that it was you who posted in it.... Just call it a day and wait for someone useful to finish the rim. If they can't do it, you most certainly can't. Just my two cents
[EVO 4G Android Development] neno2323:
Man who cares let the guy do his thang.. its almost 2012 man live and let live..
[EVO 4G Android Development] Papa Smurf151:
It comes down to this.....did u really dev anything? No

Did u compile from source? No

Pretty much ur a chef that is still learning. But why release a whole rom to start. Obviously your new and inexperienced as u stated in op but does that mean u release a rom that has nothing really done to it other than a added launcher and some scripts put into it that are readily available to others already.

Did u write the scripts? No

Yeah u decompiled a few system apks. What did u edit some pngs or an XML here or there.

I am not knocking u for wanting to learn and become a great dev. By all means go for it. This community needs that. But learn first then post work. The bakery shop realized this and is starting to learn what it takes to do this. What is so hard to understand? Is it that hard to search and read and apply and keep doing it until u have something unique?

It takes most great devs weeks if not months for them to get a base that they post. Some r quicker some take longer but what they don't do is release someone else's work and promise to make it theirs eventually once they learn.

Hope i don't get flamed for this and that u take it to heart
[EVO 4G Android Development] njdan30:
Who shives a git
[EVO 4G Android Development] gears1979:
You guys are funny! Arguing whos a dev and who's not. Does it really matter? No. Is he hurting anyone? No. If you don't like what he or what the other guy did or have not done then just move on to another thread. Oh and the last time I checked ICS was developed by Google.
[EVO 4G Android Development] Papa Smurf151:
Actually the source was built by google and released to aosp(android open source code) then compiled on a Linux box by someone who knows how to compile from source using github and such then worked on relentlessly by a few great devs who know how to code to get hw acceleration working plus countless other things and then released to us and have someone copy it and add a launcher and few pngs and scripts and call it their
[EVO 4G Android Development] DertyDOH:
all I say about the dev argument, is all the ROMS for gingerbread are based off 2 or 3 roms, mostly CM7, nothing different here, plus Decks is built on top of what Evervolv started