yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] 00McD00:
​

I have many mods which I have completed or are currently working on, so I have turned this thread into a compilation of all of those. Once I post a mod, I encourage all users to request it for any/all roms they wish to use it on. Just attach the appropriate file (will specify for mod) and the name of the rom and I will do the rest. All mods are flashable zips through recovery, please make a backup and wipe dalvik before hand.

*I take NO credit for app attached to the end of this post. It was not developed by me, I am merely posting it here for the convenience of the users of these mods. Credit for the MIUI battery bar goes to pvyParts.*

Normal disclaimer about how flashing a mod can be potentially dangerous for your phone and such. Please ALWAYS perform a backup before flashing any of my work (or anything at all for that matter). If you somehow manage to mess up your phone it is your fault, not mine. You are not allowed to sue me, all you'd get would be student loans anyways.​

Volume-Rocker Screen-on (file needed: android.policy.jar)

-DOWNLOAD FOR AOKP MILESTONE 2

-DOWNLOAD FOR GUMMYNEX 0.5.0

-DOWNLOAD FOR CODENAME 1.0.1

MIUI Battery Bar (file needed: SystemUI.apk)

*for "ICS Blue" set HEX color to: ff33b5e5*

-DOWNLOAD FOR AOKP MILESTONE 2

-DOWNLOAD FOR GUMMYNEX 0.5.0

-DOWNLOAD FOR CODENAME 1.0.1

*Example of MIUI battery bar, softkey mod NOT included*
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] drawde40599:
have u thought about posting /sending to AOKP developer ? i use the gsm version of the rom and would be real nice to see as option built in .
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] 00McD00:
Yup I have already talked to him and he is putting it in the next release. If you send me your android.policy.jar I can make it for you right now though. Up to you.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] drawde40599:
Much appreciated!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] drawde40599:
I gave u my file but it dose look like he already installed it stock, I appreciate u wiliing to do that for me tho thank u
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Hammer_Of_The_Gods:
Hi,

Here's the file for 4.03 rom (aokp rom by Romanbb,GSM):

http://www.multiupload.com/50TYOD87RQ

It's a nice tweak,thanks in advance :)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] jtseidner:
Is there any way you could do next track/previous track for the volume rocker like what's found on CM7?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] beekay201:
hi thanks for the mod.

i was wondering if you wouldnt mind making it easier for us that build from src and share that little piece of coding so that we can build with vol rocker unlock included.

/me sent this from a i9250 using Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] djras111:
Would like this for Android Revolution HD using 4.0.2 kernel
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] neederishelp:
Could you do this for gummy nexus? Thanks
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Moliang:
sent you the file, thanks
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] georgiapi:
Here is one for a stock rooted 4.0.2 Galaxy Nexus.

Thanks
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] PapaWangsta:
Is it possible to make one for the AOKP toro build 15?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] 00McD00:
I updated the OP with all the current ones I have and included the MIUI battery bar mod also. Please do not PM my files, just post in here and make sure to let me know what rom they are from. Enjoy!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] georgiapi:
Are you going to be able to do my rocker thing? Attached in previous post.

Thanks
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] SwiftLegend:
Would this work with AOKP build 15 and the Black Exodus theme?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ericphung123:
Can you add the MIUI battery bar for me please.

Thanks

Edit:And Volume rocker wake!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] 00McD00:
Nope, sorry but I can't be done on stock. Has to be coming from a rom.

Um not sure, depends on if Roman changed anything in the SystemUI from 15 to Milestone 2 (which I'm pretty sure he did). But I can guarantee it will work on M2 ;)

Can you let me know what rom this is from so I can label it when I post it?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Elemenopee:
Can you do a battery mod for bigxie's rom please.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] sluflyer06:
I can't get this(battery bar) to work on AOKP M2. I tried in vain and cleared cache and dalvik, re-flashed the ROM and then this mod and no go. This file also kills the network icon from showing when its on HSPA+ even though I've confirmed "4g" is working.

I am also running a 4 way lockscreen & modded stock launcher but neither contain a update to systemUI.apk.

Any pointers?

---------- Post added at 03:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:13 PM ----------

I got it...I found the control app on RootzWiki, its missing from this threads post. Once I installed it...boom :)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ericphung123:
It's the AOKP M2 rom but with mods on top from

rootzwiki.com/topic/14474-7-zip-add-on-team-kang-lives-aokp-milestone-2-now-with-fast-hotkey-modupdated-01112012-1130am-mst

sorry can't direct link under 10posts :\
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] 00McD00:
Definitely, just get me the SystemUI.apk and I can get it done.

Haha whoops my bad, I forgot to attach it (like usual). Glad you found it, but the OP has now been updated and it is attached.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] :
Whats The volume Rocker mod? Can't imagine anything
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] SwiftLegend:
Could you apply the MIUI battery mod to this modified AOKP Build 15 SystemUI ? It's from the Black Exodus theme.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] jug6ernaut:
Loving the battery mod, had it long ago on Wm forgot how awseome it is lol.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] CBMC:
Can anyone let me know what is being edited in the android.policy.jar that allows volume wake to work. It seems that this is causing problems on winners cnet and would like to be able to compile the file myself. Thanks in advance.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] nunggg:
please make for aokp_maguro_build-16a
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] sert00:
i'm very glad if you have the time and the possibility of do the volume rocker mod for manhattan rom...here the file needed..

thanks in advance,i tried myself but jar files i don't know how to decompile...systemUI and framework i can myself..but jar it's the first time!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] SerkSerk:
Is this thread alive, i really want to get the miui battery bar on my phone

҉Envoyé depuis mon Samsung Galaxy 3 avec Kyorarom 5.2 ҉
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] kanej2006:
I've had my Samsung Note for the last month and whilst I'm happy with it I cannot help but grumble about it's speed/response even when used on different launchers...

Though it runs ok it can be slow from time to time especially when suddenly unlocking it and opening your contacts or messages. This results in a few second delay.

Also when scrolling up/down through contacts/settings menu it's jerky, not smooth.

When comparing it to my Sony Ericsson Xperia Play which has a single core 1GHz cpu & 512Mb of ram it is miles faster and 100% smooth in every possible way compared to my Note. You'd expect the Note to be faster than The Sony Ericsson Xperia.

Why is a much lower spec phone much faster & smoother than my Note?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] easycure1974:
You might think on that the Note has almost three times the pixelamount to shuffle around compared to a SE Play
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] kanej2006:
That's true but then why make an underpowered phone which then results in lag & sluggishness?

Samsung should of increased the ram & cpu to solve this issue...

I know the SE has far less pixelmounts to shuffle but it's still bad considering a phone having just 512mb ram and a single core 1GHz processor destroy a phone having almost double the ram & a dual core processor.

I would of least expected it to be of a similar speed but it's lagging far behind.

The ONLY areas in which My Samsung Note beats my SE in tems of speed are:

Internet/browsing

Going through photos/zooming in/out

Aside from these 2 points the Note is far slower in every possible way. I hope the upcoming icecream sandwich can solve these issues...

I've seen several people running the proper official version of ice cream sandwich as standard on their Samsung Galaxy Nexus and their saying it's a HUGE & NOTICABLE difference compared to the previous version of Android.

I hope the same can be said when the Note gets it's upgrade!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] Gaugerer:
This sounds like an individual problem. For if the Note was faulty as described then it would have been noticed by the 80% in the poll here who like me think the note is pretty perfect.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] katyarevishal:
that is not an answer........note also has dual core prossesor wid more speed and double ram.....so whatever may b d reason, it should not b slow or laggy.....:(

Reason is not pixel or hardware, its software......

Gingerbread is not optimised for this, it is not utilising the power of note fully. just wait for ICS to come ;)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] easycure1974:
Of course it has do with the pixels also. My SGS II was way smoother than the Note even though it has been better with KL7 rom. And the difference between them is that the Note has three times more pixels wich the higher clocked CPU cant make up to. And SE are known to have on of the fastest launchers of all the Android makers. Much quicker than Touchwiz
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] kanej2006:
Could be. The strangest thing is that MOST other launchers I've tried are worse and lag. Examples are ADW Launcher, Go Launcher and even the Ice Cream Sandwich Launcher...

The ONLY launcher that runs quite well is Launcher Pro Plus which runs slightly quicker than the stock touchwiz.

When trying Windows 7 Launcher it didn't work period, the home screen shakes up/down when trying to scroll...

Hopefully the next update should fix my problems. I am hoping Ice Cream Sandwich will resolve ALL my issues!

Thanks for backing me up. I fully agree 100% that Gingerbread has NOT been properly optimized to make full use of the Note, unfortunately...

The Note was made for ICS and as you also mentioned I hope ICS gives us an even better and faster Note.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] Gaugerer:
This must bean individual problem. For if the Note was faulty as described then why isn't it a problem for every Note user?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] kanej2006:
I've read many posts on this very forum with people grumbling about lag and smoothness...
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] Gaugerer:
That doesn't answer my question. If the Note is faulty then why doesn't everyone have the problem?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] stesteste:
Try rocet rom defosnappy like sg2 freeze apps u dont need wifi sharing etc
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] InverseSandwich:
Why don't you flash a custom ROM
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] Braxos:
Because people doesn't see a problem on the same issues or doesn't have noticed at all custom brightness on high never used the phone on low light places. Never played a dark video, using Samsung wallpaper. Never where on forums to read about the problems. My phone didn't have a pink spot on camera till I headed about it and reproduced low light with white paper on macro shot, and there was a pink spot, used flash on same pic no pink spot same conditions. Simple if you don't know it isn't there :P
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] aigoya:
Coming from the gtab 10.1, adw launcher was recommended to get rid of slight home screen lag, which it did.

So I threw up adw launcher on my note, and it is definitely slower than stock twlauncher.

Kinda strange.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] tsekh501:
Well, adding more RAM won't make it more responsive, and it is already running the fastest dual core SoC on the market. So spec wise there is not much Samsung can do. Maybe in a few months when quad core SoC becomes mainstream it will release a Note 2 with quad core SoC.

My dad has a Note and I do feel that my Galaxy Nexus is more responsive. Given that the resolutions on the two are similar, I think after the ICS update the Note will run smoother overall. That is of course assuming that the new version of TouchWiz won't screw the phone up.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] kanej2006:
Since when did I mention anything about the Note being faulty?

I simply said it is not performing as well as it should and most people will agree with me.

You are the one who implied that my Note is faulty, not me.

There is nothing wrong with my Note apart from it's sluggish performance.

Many other users on this forum have opened up threads with regards to performance issues as well as methods of trying to speed the Note up.

If you go through the first few pages of the Galaxy Note General section you will see several threads with forums regarding input lag, slowness & other response issues...

As katyarevishal kindly explained ONE big reason for the lag/slow downs of the Note is due to the high pixel density of the screen.

Aside from the pixel density the Note's performance is let down because of Gingerbread and it's poor optimization.

Last but not least, WHY do you think so many people are counting down the days and looking forward to the release of Ice Cream Sandwich?

Simple, because they are hoping it will solve issues many of which I've already mentioned, mainly the lag and the fact it's not running as smoothly as it should.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] Gaugerer:
Polls here show 80% of owners have no issues with the Note, get real.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] Braxos:
I don't think it is the same if you say having issues and the phone has some issues. As I said before my phone has issues I don't have with the phone. They will get fixed some day
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] aigoya:
Polls here show: Out of the people who TOOK THE POLL, 80% of them have no issues.

Here is the poll you mentioned:

http://xdaforums.com/poll.php?do=showresults&pollid=7143

Sample size of 139 people.

80% which you have claimed have no issues = 111 individuals without problems.

This is not considering poll bias, skewed data, and other extra factors.

80% of Note users here on xda and 111 individuals who own a note here on xda are TWO different things.

So stop going around posting your canned 'it must be an individual problem, 80% of users love it, galaxy note is not faulty' responses and try to say something useful.

I can't tell if you're a troll, a horribly misguided fellow who doesn't understand how internet polls works, or just a terrible marketing intern
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] kanej2006:
Well said aigoya, never did I say the Note was a bad device, only that it's performance was slightly sluggish and it's not performing as it should.

It's performance is being held back due to Gingerbread & will hopefully perform better in everyway when Ice Cream Sandwich is released, that's what many of us are hoping for.

I'm very happy with my Note in every other aspect.

As for Gaugerer I have no idea why he is having a go at me. We are here to discuss, help & trouble shoot, not troll and misguide others...
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] PurpleMelbourne:
I have seen you post useless replies in three different threads (oncluding mine) where people have a problem and are going to the trouble of publicly trying to fix it. You basically troll in and dismiss their concerns as "not affecting 80%" of people. The implication is their problem is umimportant as their problem is not yours so it doesn't matter.

Posting to a minor thread can be slightly helpful to keep traffic up. But you seem to be on a campaign to disrupt solutions being found to problems which are real. Maybe in the end it will be an easy fix. That would be great and does not mean a problem doesn't exist.

Don't be a troll. Our Galaxy Note is a great device and finding solutions to problems with our phones makes the world a tiny bit better. And XDA developers exists for this very reason.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] kanej2006:
He is indeed a troll, in EVERY forum he boasts how perfect the Note is and that ANY problem regardless of what it is, is individual.

check this out:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1414350

Scroll down to post number 7, the EXACT same answer he uses in other threads. Sure he's not a spambot/marketing person?

As you will see once again he has trolled & put the very same answer he put on here, as if it were a copy & paste.

Users like him should be banned since their unhelpful.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] katyarevishal:
Dude he never said his note is faulty.:rolleyes:

He is just saying his note should be faster and not laggy... thats it.....

So do you mean these many pixels cant be handled by phone? What about Galaxy nexus then ? its way more responsive than note in spite of having lil slower processor and the reason................ ICS (Well optimised OS ! )
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] eddiee:
Surely this is software, not hardware problem. I still hope that some rom update will fix it (hoping before ICS comes out).

If it would be only pixel count, how is it possible that e.g. GTAIII runs OK on full resolution? Pixel count matters almost exclusively for graphics chip which is fully ready for such resolution.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] paulshields:
I think a lot of the perceived sluggishness is due to how Samsung have integrated TouchWiz into the Android OS. TouchWiz is a lot more than the launcher so swapping that out doesn't remove the other "enhancements" that Samsung have blessed us with...

The delay after pressing the home button is at least partly due to the OS waiting to see if you double-clicked - an action that normally launches the voice actions app. You can see in logcat that then home key is pressed it waits for a short while for another tap.

I/ScreenCaptureAction( 2819): updateHomeKeyPressed(), pressed = true
D/RestrictionPolicy( 2819): isHomeKeyEnabled :true
I/HomeKeyDoubleClick( 2819): addAction() is called. action = 0 canceled = false
I/HomeKeyDoubleClick( 2819): in addAction(), now add
I/HomeKeyDoubleClick( 2819): in addAction(), down event. now call postCheckRunnable().
I/HomeKeyDoubleClick( 2819): postCheckRunnable() is called
I/HomeKeyDoubleClick( 2819): in postCheckRunnable(), now posting.
I/HomeKeyDoubleClick( 2819): in postCheckRunnable(), posting success.
D/InputReader( 2819): Input event: value=1
D/RestrictionPolicy( 2819): isHomeKeyEnabled :true
D/InputReader( 2819): Input event: value=0
I/ScreenCaptureAction( 2819): updateHomeKeyPressed(), pressed = false
D/RestrictionPolicy( 2819): isHomeKeyEnabled :true
I/HomeKeyDoubleClick( 2819): addAction() is called. action = 1 canceled = false
I/HomeKeyDoubleClick( 2819): in addAction(), now add
D/RestrictionPolicy( 2819): isHomeKeyEnabled :true
I/HomeKeyDoubleClick( 2819): run() is called *****************************************************
I/HomeKeyDoubleClick( 2819): isSingleClick() is called
I/HomeKeyDoubleClick( 2819): list value = (0) 0 (1) 1
I/HomeKeyDoubleClick( 2819): in isSingleClick() true
I/HomeKeyDoubleClick( 2819): -------------------------------single clicked
I/HomeKeyDoubleClick( 2819): singleClickJob() is called.
I/HomeKeyDoubleClick( 2819): in singleClickJob(), mSentHomeDownToApp is false. Now call launchHomeFromHotKey()
I/HomeKeyDoubleClick( 2819): launchHomeFromHotKey() is called.
I/HomeKeyDoubleClick( 2819): in launchHomeFromHotKey(), now call startDockOrHome(), #2
D/StatusBarService( 2958): animateCollapse() - updateViewLayout
I/ActivityManager( 2819): Starting: Intent { act=android.intent.action.MAIN cat=[android.intent.category.HOME] flg=0x10200000 cmp=com.sec.android.app.twlauncher/.Launcher } from pid 2819
I/Launcher( 3102): onPause. Launcher: 405a0ec0
I/HomeKeyDoubleClick( 2819): reset() is called
I/HomeKeyDoubleClick( 2819): in reset() after reset, mPosted = false mHomeActionList.size() = 0
I/Launcher( 3102): onResume. Launcher: 405a0ec0, mIsNewIntent: true

It is a bit annoying, and it happens at a low level within the code. Changing launcher from TW to another one doesn't remove that double tap check. What would be interesting is running a pure AOSP version like cyanogenmod with these Samsung layers removed. I suspect the phone would feel a lot snappier in areas where it currently feels "sluggish". Having said that, I generally think the Note performs very well. Just need to get a pure ICS on it to really start motoring :).
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] pjm77:
Exactly, this is software problem and the underlying reason is the way Android deals with rendering the GUI. It's been explained before and it has to be changed at some point but Google are too busy with other things at the moment. Plus Samsung itself do shoddy work software-wise, most of the programs that came with my note had some issues. It needs time bo get ironed out, otherwise the device wouldn't be here yet. Flash the newest firmware, it makes a difference.

The man that you call a troll isn't one. He simply has problem understanding how personal perception is. I remember seeing clips on youtube with people using the note with lags that made my teeth itch and commenting in the background how snappy this device feels. Different preferences, different expectations. The choppines of GUI on the Note doesn't render the device unusable, it just robs you of the pleasure while using it. The simple way of understanding what we're on here is to go to the phone shop and take the note in one hand and the iphone in the other and just do some basic operations. Scrolling lists, swiping screens - then it becomes obvious but it's simply not important enough for most poeple. For me it is essential so I'm all with you here.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] Braxos:
+1 on your post

But don't compare iphone with a none apple phone. Apple is making the hone and the os for it, it should fit exact to it. Every other phone has a os and tries to fits to the produced phone. A huge difference. Wait till Google buys a manufacture company and produces phone and os for it. Of then the OS will not be open source as those atm.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] pjm77:
I don't compare it to apple, I don't give a **** about apple. If I thought that apple is better I'd get one end of story. What I'm trying to say here is that this level of smoothness is becoming an industry standard (iOS, Windows 7,

PalmOS) and Android is lagging behind and they shouldn't postpone addressing this issue anymore.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] Jade Eyed Wolf:
I know it may be expensive, but try using SPB Shell 3D. It's not as buttery smooth as it is on the SGS2, but at least it is consistent. I think shifting the homescreen rendering off of the CPU over to the GPU instead makes quite a bit of difference. If this is what ICS will be doing, then things are looking promising for future development!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] kanej2006:
I tried this launcher, it wasn't bad. Of all the launchers I've tried I wouldn't say it's the best but second best launcher.

It's quite snappy and eye candy but the only major negative was that it took a lot of ram & cpu resulting in bad battery. Even on standby it would drop like hell...

My number one favourite browser in which was the smoothest and best looking would have to be Launcher Pro.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] martcerv:
The note has a far as I know the fastest processor and most ram of any mobile phone, There is none out there with better hardware so its the top of the current generation and your asking why its not double the ram and has a faster processor :confused:

This is as good as it gets atm, the next gen will be faster but the note is pushing the limits with mobile technology and amount of pixels its pushing. If you put the same hardware in a lower res screen you will get better performance.

If that's what you want then get a Galaxy S2, if you want a higher res screen then you will have to accept this wont be as smooth no matter what software optimizations you throw at it.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] nbass668:
personally my note unlocks so smooth and fast and lunches any application so quick... I am on stock 2.3.6

do I face some lags? yes but extremely less and I believe this will vanish with ICS...

turn off power saving and screen animations... perhaps this would help