yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Android General] 16k:
you can use the Tasselhof-RootScript.rar

Seems to be working just fine if you follow the steps.

http://www.slatedroid.com/topic/23750-root-ainol-novo-7-tasselhof-root-market-script-tools/

Download Link: Mediafire.com - Tasselhof-RootScript.rar

Alternate Link: DropBox.com - Tasselhof-RootScript.rar

This is a straightforward script.

It's sole purpose is to get your device rooted and provide the tools to verify it.

- Cleaned Up some extra unneeded files and added the Android Market App Upgrade from ContemptX! - Thanks!

I have added some options to Disable and Enable services to hopefully help with battery life.

**IMPORTANT PRE-CHECK LIST**

Connect your tablet using the OTG port (normal procedure)

- YOU MUST USE THE INCLUDED USB CABLE

Make sure USB Debugging is ENABLED

- Settings --> Applications --> Development --> USB debugging (Green Checkmark)

Make sure to check Device Manager to ensure that there aren't any devices with a yellow exclamation mark.

- Right Click on My Computer --> Manage Device --> Device Manager

Here is a link to a driver package I created... (not positive it contains the needed one for this device, but it is a good place to start)

- Download Link: Mediafire.com - Android-USB-MultipleDriverPack.rar
[Android General] goges:
thanks ... testing now

---------- Post added at 02:56 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:33 AM ----------

the root script work half ..

before i can't flash the recovery , it said read only

after i use this script, the superuser not installed ..

but i can flash recovery , and use cwm to flash the superuser..

finally my tablet is work

*** MagicCode for ICS is out
[Android General] LiquidL:
ICS kernel source

Does anyone know where I can find the source code for Linux kernel for Novo 7 Basic (MIPS)?

I looked on the Ingenic site but they have Linux for their older SoCs but not the JZ4770 powering the Novo 7. I went on the Ainol website but it's mostly in Chinese. I am interested in the latest kernel source on which ICS runs on top of.
[Android General] djjuice:
excellent...
[Android General] LiquidL:
I contacted Ingenic engineering and they said their kernel is 'closed-source' for the jz4770 but they have full sources for their older jzxxx chips for download.. Funny how open source can suddenly become closed when convenient. Shame it would have been fun customizing this mips tablet.
[Android General] giobell69:
I suggest to insist. They can't refuse to give access to the used kernel sources, it's Gpl. Only thing they can leave as closed are proprietary hw drivers.
[Android General] joe ferreira:
and you can copy these drivers out of the update.zip provided on their site.

also try this...

http://developer.mips.com/android/android-source-code/
[Android General] auand88:
I plan to buy this device next month

but the issue of the mips processor makes me a little hesitant
[Android General] oleg9595:
Say please and than you can open the ROM file

system.img

in 4.0.3 or 4.0.1??

thanks in advance:)
[Android General] lenik:
не уверен, что именно ты хотел спросить, но если тебе нужно добраться до содержимого system.img, это можно сделать в любом линухе командой:

mount system.img system/ -o loop

предварительно создав каталог system/
[Nook Color General] androidifyme:
NNow that Web OS is open source, do you think we could get it to run on the nook?

WEB OS goes open-source says webos

http://developer.palm.com/blog/2011/12/open-source/

sdk

https://developer.palm.com/content/resources/develop/sdk_pdk_download.html
[Nook Color General] slab:
I would certainly think it's possible. WebOS is Linux-based, so you could probably reuse the existing Android Linux kernel... you'd just have to get all the userland stuff working on it.

That said, I don't know if anyone's been actively looking at doing WebOS on the NC (or WebOS on any non-HP devices, for that matter).

There was an effort porting pre-open-source WebOS to the Hero (referred to here: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=948473) but it got shut down at the time.
[Nook Color General] patruns:
A question like this from someone called "androidifyme"? :rolleyes:
[Nook Color General] boomn:
The WebOS source hasn't actually been released yet, they have only announced a plan to do so in the near future with no specific dates given. Also, they won't be releasing the entire OS at that time based on the line in their press statement that they "also will contribute ENYO, the application framework for webOS, to the community in the near future along with a plan for the remaining components of the user space."

---------- Post added at 09:24 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:18 AM ----------

the Android kernel is pretty heavily modified from the stock Linux kernel to work with the Android system, and for all we know the WebOS Linux kernel could be the same way. I doubt it would work just like that, however having working kernel sources from Android would certainly make it easier to get device-specific drivers working in the WebOS Linux kernel. And like I said in my other post, unfortuantely the userland stuff does not appear to be a part of their initial open source plan anyway
[Nook Color General] androidifyme:
You are Ignorant, I just built my webos sdk, and could compile a webos platform I am just curious and will be looking into what needs to be done. name means nothing, I like the idea of several options and learning at this point because one linux to another doesnt really matter, at some point the nook, should have its own distro like its calling itself a "nookbuntu", so why not. and it would be nice to be able to utilize other carrier or os services that dont work on android vs webos. to stay connected
[Nook Color General] slab:
Yeah, I wouldn't expect it to be drop-and-go, but I also wouldn't expect the kernel to be the biggest stumbling block.
[Nook Color General] boomn:
I agree *10 chars

---------- Post added at 09:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:56 PM ----------

Sorry, but I have to repeat: WebOS is not open-sourced yet.

An SDK is just a set of tools to help developers build and test WebOS apps on their pc, and one of those tools is a pre-compiled image of WebOS for use in an emulator. It won't allow you to build WebOS itself, only apps that work in WebOS.

As required per the GPL, the source has always been available for their versions of the Linux kernel and various open-source libraries and tools they use (link here). The rest of the OS, including a lot of the system programs and libraries, the user interface, the libraries needed to actually run WebOS apps, etc has not been open-sourced yet. They announced the plan only a couple weeks ago, and they have a lot of work ahead of them before they can start releasing code for parts of WebOS. For example, they will have to strip out and/or replace any code or libraries they have bought licences for from other companies. Cleaning up "colorful" comments in the code is pretty important to many companies too
[Nook Color General] androidifyme:
Again I understand your attemt to be lame, please shut up, and leave this thread as you are ignorant.

http://developer.palm.com/blog/2011/12/open-source/

https://developer.palm.com/content/resources/develop/sdk_pdk_download.html
[Nook Color General] boomn:
Thanks for the continuing and escalating insults while I try to explain this all.

I've read all of those links as those were some of my sources for my previous posts. Your first link is to the announcement that they have a plan to release the source ("HP will make...", not "HP has now released..." or anything similar) to parts of the OS ("underlying code of webOS") in the near future. Further down you find where they make it clearer that their initial release won't be the complete source to WebOS ("HP also will contribute ENYO, the application framework for webOS, to the community in the near future along with a plan for the remaining components of the user space.").

As for the SDK, I already covered that. From that page: "HP webOS 3.0.4 SDK contains the libraries necessary to do both JavaScript development and C/C++ development". It's a set of development tools for app programmers. Wikipedia has a good summary article about SDKs here. HP/Palm been releasing updated versions of the SDK since WebOS first hit the market on Palm phones, otherwise 3rd party developers would not have ever been able to properly make apps that can run in WebOS, and the SDKs have never included the full WebOS source. Please excuse my silly analogy, but if WebOS were a house then the SDK might be a woodshop set up for building furniture to put in that house.

If you don't trust me then check wikipedia's current page about the WebOS open source plan that says: "On December 9, 2011, HP announced its plans to release WebOS source code under an open-source license at some time in the near future." Or google for "webos source code released" and see if you find anything besides the SDK, the GNU tools I mentioned earlier or a whole lot of news articles about the announced plan to eventually open-source their OS. Or check the WebOS Dev forum here on XDA, including comments like this one. When the base code is finally released there will be a lot more talk about it on all of those places.
[Nook Color General] androidifyme:
Yup you are officialy 10 and stupid, an sdk by definition is open source, htc sense is not open source but android is, this is what hp had done with webos, we will be able to create full distrobution of webos and configure it for a device and use the tools in the sdk to compile apps for that device. You might be able to read but you obviously have no coding skills. That all being said, just leave this thread once and for all we dont need you and your annoying as hell. but you seem to be a decent googler just hope one day you can get paid for it. until then keep googleing maybe youll learn something.

Oh and if you do contact them, and register they will send you the whole package to begin developing, thanks for letting me prove you wrong I have contacted them to receive such package. The reason for such measures is to keep fools like you from even trying to play with their source
[Nook Color General] boomn:
Wow. I can see the fruitlessness of trying to add further proof. You'll have to figure out reality on your own then. Please do me the favor of revisiting this thread once you've received all the HP files and had a chance to try building WebOS

I couldn't be 10 because it was about 10 years ago that I started using Linux. Got a minor in Computer Science since then too
[Nook Color General] therkr:
Why are(/were) you even trying to explain something to an A hole like him?
[Nook Color General] therkr:
Though I do appreciate your comments. They further cleared the picture in my mind
[Nook Color General] boomn:
I should have asked myself that earlier :o
[Nook Color General] Divine_Madcat:
Wow guys.... Take this kind of flaming elsewhere.. Its not welcome at xda..

Pointless thread closed.
[XPERIA X10 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] neoxx3m:
Nice question.Anyone?

Sent from my xperia "z10i" :)
[Galaxy S II General] leminhnguyen0703:
The maximum theorical HSPA+ speed supported by hardware on the SkyRocket is 42mbps while the S2 is 21mbps. The processor on the SkyRocket is a Qualcomm because our Exynos chip doesn't support 42mbps.
[Galaxy S II General] TheSopranos16:
Thanks for the reply. Interesting thought but according to this page, the Skyrocket is also 21mbps HSPA+, same as our phones.
[Galaxy S II General] leminhnguyen0703:
Hah ! I'm not sure, cos the SkyRocket amd the Tmobile s2 are supposed to be nearly identical. Can't find an exact quote by AT&T regarding this as well
[Galaxy S II General] crachel:
I get 6 Mbps down and 2 up with KL1 modem using the wap.cingular APN
[Galaxy S II General] TheSopranos16:
Ok I just tried the wap.cingular APN, I got the same performance as on 'phone'. What is your ping like? The Skyrocket was getting 50's and 60's consistently and I never approach pings that low in my i9100.
[Galaxy S II General] dan1431:
I have gotten as high as 8Mbps down and 2.2 up with the KL1 modem using the "phone" apn.

In fact at the office my GT-I9100 (the international version) is generally faster than my colleagues SkyRocket when testing download/upload speeds.

Dan
[Galaxy S II General] TheSopranos16:
Wow, really? Do I have defective hardware? I know speeds vary a lot by location but the Skyrocket has consistenly been faster everywhere I've tested it so it proves the network is capable of much more than my phone is achieving. Also, I've never wiped my phone since I got it, could that be a factor (I doubt it because I don't have a single issue but I'm just throwing it out there).

Anyone else able to test their i9100 vs a skyrocket or at&t gs2? BTW I am currently using KL1 as well and don't get the results you are getting.
[Galaxy S II General] MPKO:
Compare tcp reveive window size and window scaling settings, also if there is a proxy defined in apn, sgs2 is not following it unfortunately....
[Galaxy S II General] MPKO:
If there is a huge difference in ping it could indicate that skyrocket apn is "optimized" via special proxy. And as i mentioned, even u tried your wife's sim, sgs2 is ignoring it due to it limitation...

Only guessing...
[Galaxy S II General] teiglin:
You should put your SIM in your wife's skyrocket, then call AT&T and ask them to put you on the LTE plan--assuming they don't charge more for this--then switch back and run some more tests. It could be that the pta apn isn't allowing the I9100 whatever increased throughput it is granting the skyrocket because you're on a different speed plan.

It's also possible that the Qualcomm HSPA+ hardware is just better (please don't lynch me for this suggestion).
[Galaxy S II General] TheSopranos16:
Ok, thanks all for the input. Tonight I am going to try her sim in my phone with the pta apn. Then if the speeds improve I'll know thats the issue and I can work on getting my sim provisioned to the LTE plan as well. I know her sim is set up on that plan and will work with the pta apn so I'll be able to test it that way. I'll also put my sim in her phone and set up the 'phone' apn and try that, just to see. I'll report back late tonight or tomorrow with my findings.
[Galaxy S II General] crachel:
using XXKL1

down/up in kilobits per second

5894/1075 - 122ms ping

1551/1082 - 167ms ping

6806/1080 - 119ms ping

1160/781 - 121ms ping

..kinda all over the place but this is expected at 4pm
[Galaxy S II General] Lancez:
This is what I got a few min. ago using wap.cingular APN. Upload speed is on the slow side but download speed is on par as your wife's. Keep in mind, the test was performed in LA area around 16:45. I'm using DXKL1 modem.
[Galaxy S II General] spdapimp217:
I'm interested to see how this turns out. I've been wondering the same thing. I know LTE is definitely faster but I still think that my speeds should be faster than they really are. Later this week I'm going to go to the AT&T Corporate store in my area and compare my speeds against some of their other "4G" devices and see where I fall.
[Galaxy S II General] TheSopranos16:
So I tested my phone with my wife's LTE provisioned SIM card and got the same slow speeds. But, I then was able to change the apn to pta and try again and that did the trick. I started getting ping's in the 50-70 range and much higher download speeds (hit 6.5 around my house for the first time ever). So I can confirm that the Skyrocket gets better speeds because it is using the 'pta' apn. And to use that apn, you have to have an LTE SIM with the LTE data plan. I went to my local AT&T store today and upgraded my sim and switched that plan and I am now enjoying consistently better data speeds.

I will update the first post to reflect my findings so everyone will know how to get the better speeds.

On a completely different topic, we were in Brooklyn NY last night where AT&T has LTE coverage. I did a few speed tests on my wife's Skyrocket and WOW, its insanely fast. With just 1 bar of signal it got over 10mbps down and with 4 bars it got 58 mbps down and 17 mbps up. I couldn't believe my eyes but I ran multiple tests and all were incredibly fast. I don't know if AT&T will be able to maintain speeds like that once the network gets saturated but the idea of having substantially faster internet on my cell phone as compared to my FIOS internet at home is really insane. I can't wait for them to expand the LTE network, hopefully they get it up and running in New Jersey right in time for my next phone upgrade.
[Galaxy S II General] spdapimp217:
Just went to the AT&T store to get an upgrade for my dad. Did his upgrade and then was in the process of getting my LTE sim but their system wouldn't let them process the request. He told me to just come back tomorrow and he'll try it again.
[Galaxy S II General] TheSopranos16:
Cool, let me know how it works out. For me, they had to play around with the imei to get the system to allow the LTE plan on the account. I just told them that I sometimes put my sim in LTE compatible phones and I need it to work for when I do. Took him 10 minutes to fight with the system then he was able to get it to work. They did it for no charge and I was able to keep my unlimited data plan.
[Galaxy S II General] spdapimp217:
OK cool, I know there was no issue when I first did that for HSPA+ when I got my GSII. I'm going to try it again tomorrow. The guy that helped me out was cool and I told him he'd have to probably get the IMEI from one of their LTE devices to "activate" me. I also have unlimited so that's good to hear.
[Galaxy S II General] spdapimp217:
Just left the AT&T store and got a great rep. I was literally in and out in 15 minutes, 12 of those were waiting for someone to be able to help me.

I updated my APN and can successfully connect to the "pta" APN. Ran it twice so far and ping is between 50-70 which is better than I have gotten so far. Thanks a lot for this btw. Hopefully speeds will improve slightly overall.
[Galaxy S II General] Entropy512:
AT&T's HSPA+ network doesn't actually support anything higher than 14.4 mbps or so I'm fairly certain. They haven't actually enabled 21 Mbps support anywhere.

Also, I've seen reports that the "pta" APN may have some content filtering not present on the "phone" APN.
[Galaxy S II General] TheSopranos16:
@spdapimp217 Glad you are getting better speeds as well. Without the pta apn I never got pings below 100 so the change literally cuts the ping in half. That will make a big difference for things like video calls.

@Enthropy512 I believe AT&T supports 21mbps according to this article. Also, I wasn't aware that pta has content filtering, do you have a source for this? I'd be interested to understand how that works.
[Galaxy S II General] Hogir:
OK guys, Im glad I found this thread :P

I was using KL1 modem and the Cingular APN. But it doesn't work that good. I lose connection every 2-3 minutes. I have o turn data on and off in order for it to start over again. Sometimes restart.

For now I'm on ICS. But it sucks because it drains my battery sooo fast, but the internet is decent.

What can I do? I really want to go back to GB...
[Galaxy S II General] mbwatson:
I stayed on GB but using XXLPS modem with no problems. On AT&T in West Texas.
[Galaxy S II General] ronj1986:
10 chars
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] mimart7:
I've seen some threads about SR users reporting echo when using a case. I'm looking for something that provides good protection, but is echo free, and ideas?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] a320ca:
You'll need to find a case where "both" mic holes (top and bottom) are larger than those on the phone itself. Too many of these cases have tiny holes and thus if not "perfectly" aligned will block all or part of the mic.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] mimart7:
If I have to, I can enlarge the holes, slightly.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] 00mred00:
That is exactly what i dod
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] ReggieSmith:
Will this cause you to hear an echo of your OWN voice or the voice of the person you are talking to? I ask because my girlfriend just got an iPhone 4s and has an Otterbox Defender case on it and has been complaining of an echo.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] a320ca:
The echo I experienced with the SGP Neo Hybrid and some others with the Otterbox were such that when I would talk to someone (my end would be loud and clear), while they would report hearing an echo when they spoke. I removed my case and no more echo.

I'm now running the Seidio case with no problems. :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] d451d:
+1 for the Seido cases, all of the Mic holes line up and are larger than the ones on the phone its self. I am constantly on speakerphone stranded on conference calls at work and never get any complaints. (I switch between the Active and Surface Cases depending on where I am going that day.)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] hooha23:
not gonna say it...not gonna say it...not gonna say it...

no but seriously, the diztronic cases on amazon are outstanding. no echo problems at all. fits like a glove.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] MrSub:
I have the casemate pop case and there is no echo. I like it better than the otterbox commuter.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] mimart7:
I'll be buying a Seido or Casemate, later this week.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] gcretro:
Bumping an old post.

- I got a otter-box commuter case put on my AT&T S2 skyrocket and everyone is complaining of echo on their side (i.e. they hear themselves)

I see that there is a hole on the top and the bottom. Should I enlarge these?

Appreciate if someone can share the specifics (those who successfully modified the commuter case).
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] droidbabyxda:
Have the same problem... took the case off.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] thecalip:
Is anyone using Groove IP with T989?

I am having a problem with Groove IP not able to re-connect while the phone is sleeping after a connection loss.

For example: You walk into a mall or go into the subway and your phone signal is loss. Then when your phone acquired signal again, Groove IP does not reconnect automatically. When you wake up the phone, then Groove IP reconnect.

I first noticed this yesterday at a mall and then did some testing with WiFi.

These are the step to reproduce it (Tested on both stock and Juggernaut):

1) Connected the phone through WiFi

2) Once it is connected, put the phone to sleep

3) Go to the router and disable WiFi.

4) Wait a few minutes, call your groove IP #. Phone does not ring

5) Re-enable WiFi from the router.

6) Wait a few min, Call your groove ip. Phone does not ring

7) Wake up your phone and you will see Groove IP logging in.

I have also performed this test on Evo 3D, and EVO 3D is work as expected. When you loss and re-establish connection, Groove IP will connect again.

Groove IP said it is because the CPU go into power saving state while sleeping. If this is the case, does anyone know how to fix it?
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] SwervFusion:
When u say put the phone to sleep do u mean turn the screen off?

I cant really test ur steps til tonight but i dont experence too many issues with groove ip. At first i noticed it wouldnt connect when switching from 4g to wifi...but i may have resolved it by checking the setting to auto connect on start.

Its under misc > startup > auto start

maybe u should clear groove ip cache...uninstall...reinstall from the market and update it. Maybe it ll help?

On my setup i use an app to turn wifi on and airplane mode when im connected to wifi...and when i disconnect from wifi it turns airplane mode off and 4g on and groove ip always reconnects for me...