yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S I9000 General] chris83210:
This is ?

http://www.twitlonger.com/show/et8h8v

onecosmic and teamhack release it's ok no?
[Galaxy S I9000 General] panblock:
Nice thread... (Y)
[Galaxy S I9000 General] rayiskon:
It's obvious u get satisfied with lil things. There is only 1 arguement in this whole issue, and that is if the hardware can handle it (and devs proved that it can), then the phone should get an update,no matter how old it is or how many ppl like u are satisfied with their 2.3 roms. If iphone 3gs got iOS 5, then all phones that can run ics should get it. Period.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] abobobilly:
Well Samsung said they'll "reconsider" ... Which means still is hope :D

Thank those people who signed that petition, which made the damn company to reconsider their stupid decision.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] sjdean:
Yes but people have been saying that other manufacturers are supporting their older phones, which appears not to be the case.

My experience with Nokia has got me used to a lifecycle of a phone and getting used to the fact that a phone is obsolete within two years, if not sooner.

Apple however are something completely different.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] TigerCourage:
Apple should at least support their old devices since they are all low-spec overpriced ones.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] :
The 'low speced' 3gs still performs better than some high end androids. That's saying something.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] nunogand:
Let's hope for a stripped version of ICS just like HTC had done with Gingerbread on Desire.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] luftys:
i hope samsung will give new year surprise.. :D
[Galaxy S I9000 General] DeadSOL:
Well, Samsung don't want to experience what NetFlix and the Bank of America experienced this year.

I was reading some financial articles and it seems that NetFlix decided to increase the price of their products while the Bank of America decided to charge for debit cards. There was a slew of consumer outrage. Petitions were signed and NetFlix lost more than 800,000 subscribers while the Bank of America lost a tonne of customers. People began to think that both companies didn't care about their customer base. They felt that they weren't treated right. Stocks plummeted drastically for both companies. What a sad move by both companies.

Now, I don't think Samsung should sink themselves into the same quagmire. Customer satisfaction is REALLY important, as can be seen from the example above. If you don't take care of your customers, you are going to face massive headwinds in growth and future sales, Samsung!
[Galaxy S I9000 General] TigerCourage:
Good point! We're talking about 30 milion people here..
[Galaxy S I9000 General] thommcn:
While I've sympathy for those who prefer to use kies to update their phone, I'm much happier without Samsung's software on my phone. Thanks to TeamHackSung on that point, I love what they've done with ICS.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] Besthiroeu:
My friend has it and its twice slower then my Sgs. In same games aswell, his loading screens take much more time etc.

Anyway you cant compare 3GS with any of 1GHz+, 512+ MB ram android smartphones. Period.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] :
I own an iPhone 3gs and putting them side by side the iPhone is faster in many areas such as: the music app where general scrolling and cover flow are smoother(along with pretty much all of the rest of the phone). Some games on both platforms are faster on the iPhone(although I agree with you about the loading times). And lastly the battery rapes my galaxy s. It shows what optimised software can do when a 2-3 year old phone can still run today's apps and games, which android released back then can? That said, I prefer my galaxy s.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] adamsbankai:
Signed the petition! Hope Samsung make their minds about ICS on Galaxy S!
[Galaxy S I9000 General] bufferpl:
Sadly most of them don't even know witch version of android they use so probably only a little fraction of users like us will get really pissed off.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] bihod:
I think at some point every smartphone enduser has to realise, that the OS version is important, even if they dont care about build numbers and such. (I mean, try browsing the market with donut now).
[Galaxy S I9000 General] MrAndroid12:
I don't believe the i9003 is included since it is a crippled version of the i9000
[Galaxy S I9000 General] burakgon:
Only a stupid bluetooth service getting 34 mb ram even its not working. Android fails here.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] gaspernemec:
Yeah agree with this...most of people with android 2.2 on their sgs are totally dissapointed and says they are never gonna buy samsung product again, but when you tell them that they could flash it to gingerbread if they dont have baws to root it usually NOBODY knows what this is...
[Galaxy S I9000 General] omar ben jdida:
You are right

Instead of fu**ing and swearing they can flash custom ICS
[Galaxy S I9000 General] wGRV:
May true, but only fraction of users made SGS famous in the market, otherwise who knew what android OS was all about?? ;)
[Galaxy S I9000 General] mbba67:
ICS for Galaxy s

Good news for galaxy s mybe in the end we will get ICS:):D.

Check this :---

http://nvonews.com/2011/12/29/samsung-galaxy-s-to-get-android-ice-cream-sandwich/
[Galaxy S I9000 General] pitucorto:
ICS for SGS!:p
[Galaxy S I9000 General] disclaimernotice:
For me, 2.2.1 is far less laggy than 2.3.6
[Galaxy S I9000 General] Riv3n:
Official drivers please...

I'll second that. I'd rather hope for the drivers than an official ICS from Samsung. They just make crappy one anyways.

Official drivers should make custom ICS roms even better and stable. :D
[Galaxy S I9000 General] houstonsveryown:
Do you sgs owners have gingerbread yet?
[Galaxy S I9000 General] Banx4you:
I hope ICS will hapend soon,ICS ports are to bugy...
[Galaxy S I9000 General] poisonborz:
It's f'in sad. I bought my SGS early 2011 in the hopes that it has enough muscle for the next big revision of Android. Seemingly it has, but Samsung says nope, and whatever happens in the future, this is a bit of a death blow.

Everyone can argue endlessly how the community would handle this, but according to my experiences, no custom roms can match ones that are based on original, more so in the department of battery usage & speed. I'm sure we'll all watch Android 21.0 running on Galaxy S on YouTube, but that's all its gonna be good for. Bugs, even smaller ones can destroy the experience.

Sure, we have ICS on the identical Nexus, but firmware-wise I think there are big differences. Sure, current roms are pretty usable, but it's simply not the same.

I hope I'm mistaken, but history shows otherwise...
[Galaxy S I9000 General] mkalter:
Hello guys,

I'll try to port xxkp8 to the galaxy s1

here's a little preview:
[Galaxy S I9000 General] demon507:
comlaint

for a phone which bring samsung to front line

not getting major os update is tragic............
[Galaxy S I9000 General] wGRV:
Just now watched the video on new leaked Samsung Galaxy S2 ICS rom, Samsung has officially r@ped ICS by adding TouchWiz to it !
[Galaxy S I9000 General] Axxell19:
If Samsung won`t release ICS for SGS, or it will be crappy, I am satisfied with Onecosmic`s ROM.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] rayiskon:
ok so i9000 sooner or later will get a decent (not sayin devs of the current versions haven't done a great job) custom ICS even if samsung doesn't release an official version, but what about other devices like i9001 and i9003? no one has even gave ICS a shot in our forums, so guys who say they don't care about official ICS coz they can flash a custom rom, well , that's not the case for all galaxy s series.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] gaspernemec:
dude im not talking about 2.2.1, i talk about 2.2! I know 2.2.1 are amazing for our sgs, but im talking about 2.2 versions which i got sgs with and it totally screwed my experience + i wasnt able to upgrade to 2.2.1 even trough kies, that made me flash and eventually root^^
[Galaxy S I9000 General] hocacihan:
http://thenextweb.com/mobile/2012/0...-deliver-value-pack-for-galaxy-s-smartphones/

new bad news !!
[Galaxy S I9000 General] Leonardus97:
Sad meh

This sucks!
[Galaxy S I9000 General] rayiskon:
Don't believe all these suspicious articles from suspicious web pages, unless it's from an official source or a relyable web page.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] devonblue4u:
I had to live with 2 MBoard SD card replacements via Froyo upgrades. Had to flash 2.3.3 unofficially because Bell was 6 months late to the party (still fashionably late with the mid-April launch of ICS on the SGS II). And now this?! I just wish somebody would offer Samsung-Class screens on other products. I'd really like the the Note, but after all this Sammy leaves me a little nervous. I'm sure glad I'm not on contract (paid cash), else I'd be really pissed.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] nCoder:
That is wrong. It was based on a wrong translation.	Sadly most tech websites copy from eachother.

What Samsung said was that due to hardware limitations "full ICS experience" cannot be delivered.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] GIRIDEGR8:
no ICS value pack too !

no value pack based on ICS, may be features from ICS into GB

http://androidos.in/2012/01/there-i...-update-for-galaxy-s-says-samsung/#more-28418

http://phandroid.com/2012/01/03/samsung-backing-out-of-plans-for-galaxy-s-value-pack-update/
[Galaxy S I9000 General] chris83210:
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_drops_plans_to_release_value_pack_for_galaxy_s-news-3607.php

is dead : no driver official :(
[Galaxy S I9000 General] DeadSOL:
Well, it's official; Samsung don't care about their customers and I don't care any more about any of their products. The Galaxy S3 can suck it.

I am also keeping ALL of my friends away from Samsung products. In this day and age, to render a less-than-two-year-old monster of a phone is an epic fail. I hope there is a lot of backlash from the community for this!
[Galaxy S I9000 General] Spikeworld:
Makes my decision for my next phone to be a nexus even more easy... i guess they will get my money anyways cause the nexus is made by samsung right :)
[Galaxy S I9000 General] Droidminator:
That pisses me off even more...
[Galaxy S I9000 General] nCoder:
As I said before: All this sites have only one source that did a wrong translation from Samsung spokesperson. (read above) Don't panic ;)

http://www.ubergizmo.com/2012/01/samsung-value-pack-is-ice-cream-sandwich-with-a-lite-version-of-touchwiz/

BTW: even if Samsung doesn't release something, in the Android world there is no real alternative to longer support (Nexus? Made by Samsung). SGS already is one of the longest survivors: we get frequent updates since Eclair (2.1).
[Galaxy S I9000 General] MasterJam882:
I think this gives us the final information:

http://thenextweb.com/mobile/2012/0...-deliver-value-pack-for-galaxy-s-smartphones/

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9000 mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy S I9000 General] pxrave:
why we cant find any statement on samsung directly?

cuz all u write is bull****, if samsung plans ics for our device we will se it

they will make lots of promotion we are the only dev who give so an old phone ics ^^ you all know the business they dont care about customers
[Galaxy S I9000 General] nCoder:
Check the updated info at the end of the page:

http://androidcommunity.com/samsung-backtracks-on-value-pack-for-galaxy-s-and-galaxy-tab-20120103/

"A full update to Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich for the GALAXY Tab(7-inch) and GALAXY S is not practicable due to hardware limitations."

This statement from Samsung is still cohherent with the previous information - Samsung is working on a LITE version of ICS for the SGS, probably without TW, or a simplified TW.

Amazing how reputable news sites simply copy from eachother without validating the information.

No need for panic. Sadly the reputation of several websites was severelly affected.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] MasterJam882:
This sounds totally different with the official words. We will see what happens!

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9000 mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy S I9000 General] kellermanv:
This isn't official ?

sammobile.com/2012/01/04/no-plans-for-value-pack-or-android-4-0-for-galaxy-s/

Since i don't have 8 posts to post a link, just copy the link into address bar.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] telep:
No, why it would be? That's sam mobile not samsung mobile.

When i read something about sgs and ICS on samsungs official blog i will belive in that, other than that i dont give a f..k.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] teox_:
all this is disgusting..
[Galaxy S I9000 General] pritishd:
Really, my Onesonic ICS Rom says otherwise......bah.....as someone said the lack of support for a phone that is less than 2 years old is pathethic.

Dear HTC, you have won me over.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] telep:
But HTC wont update their less than 2 years old phones, Desire for example.

Sent from my GT-I9000
[Galaxy S I9000 General] kellermanv:
S plus is just a couple of months old, still no update, and we have more capable hardware than i9000.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] David Sebb:
The ports developed should be sent to Samsung and their reaction should be sent back to us. Im really curios on what they will say after seeing that the ports nearly fully work on our phones.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] rayiskon:
Samsung is aware that ICS can run on SGS , but they just don't have the balls to release a clean build without their ****wiz.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] pynex:
Your're right - and to be honest - Touchwiz isn't really amazing.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] cspiby:
Your CPU is more capable, your GPU is a pile of **** though.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] gaspernemec:
Here is my 5 minutes of bull**** that doesnt even belong in this topic^^

As far as I noticed reason that sgs#1 isnt getting ICS doesnt lie in its 1GHz CPU, it lies in lack of ram for TW (512MB)-as i know SGS+ got same amount of it, plus as it was mentioned above, SGS#1 got far better GPU (allthough not best, but still same as galaxy nexus, and its ICS flagship), but on the other hand you got better CPU, so i guess reasons that SGS#1 nor SGS+ gets ICS are quite same and simple; lack of RAM to run samsungs ****wizz! My personal opinion (allthough thats not post to review SGS+) is that samsung kinda screwer sgs+ quite hard, it could give it at least some bonus ram (they should have reviewed that 512 wont be enough to run new android+TW - if they were up to make kind of mid-flagship device, since sgs+ is ment for those who want to be better than sgs and they cannot afford sgs#2) and they could place lil better gpu inside...

EDIT: I reviewed some tests and I noticed sgs#1 suck quite hard compared to SGS+ on some bench (except GPU), i wanna know, is Stock sammy rom of SGS+ is written in EXT4 or RFS?
[Galaxy S I9000 General] nail16:
samsung galaxy s+ is a great phone but has very few devs working on it, i remember when i had the i9003 the phone was completely dead the development section was empty,later the i9003 community donated a i9003 to a dev for kernel development and now the i9003 is really good apart from the ****ty lcd screen, plus the kernel has gpu overclocking, looks like we have to donate to some of the devs or our phone will be dead, the i9000 became a legend cause there was no phone like it at that time, and now we have the dual core sgs 2 so all the devs have turned their attention to sgs 2 :(

sorry for my bad English
[Galaxy S I9000 General] rvila1507:
The real issue here is that is better for Samsung to sell SGS II than develop ICS to SGS in wich it´s "impossible" to put all samsung standard stuff.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] :
im a S+ user too and I say

SCREW U SAMSUNG!
[Galaxy S I9000 General] andmail:
Samsung, make it happen!!! Go! Go! Go! )))
[Galaxy S I9000 General] gaspernemec:
SAmsung is MISSING one important thing here.... US users of SGS, screw SGSII if SGSI can work like charm....LONG LIVE SGSI
[Galaxy S I9000 General] sabretooth30:
If ICS dont come to SGS1...Never gonna buy a Samsung Device again...I got a Samsung Netbook, Samsung Galaxy S and a Samsung E1100 phone which I use for roaming for text message from Philippines. They will loose 1 loyal costumer. Lolz :D
[Galaxy S I9000 General] gaspernemec:
i think samsung slipped from my #1 potential next phone (nexus sent him to 2#)
[Galaxy S I9000 General] matthewgwilt:
Don't complain

why complain? Our device is old....:mad:

There is nothing wrong with gingerbread... Just because the "grass is greener on the other side" you want it all

I love my galaxy s and am stuck with it for another 12months... but if I worked on marketing for Samsung then I would do exactly the same as they are now..

They are a business that needs to make a profit...

New gingerbread roms are still being leaked all the time
[Galaxy S I9000 General] rayiskon:
After updating gpu drivers on i9001 3D benchmark on antutu gives around 1200 (+/- depending on the device) , i wonder how much better is the i9000's gpu if that on i9001 is a pile of ****.

Secondly, if xperia arc and arc S (both with 512mb RAM) will be getting ICS , it proves that samsung has no excuse even if they'll be forced to release a clean version without their bloatware.

Thirdly, if my i9001 doesn't get an official update i'm not buying samsung anymore, and i'm not just talking, i already did it with htc coz they treated us like crap before they released gingerbread for desire. I'm already convincing people around not to buy htc, guess i'll have to add samsung to the list. My next phone will almost surely be a nexus (hopefully made by motorola mobilty).

And lastly, to people who keep writing that the phone is old and that they are satisfied with 2.3 , this thread is really not for u, y u bother even reading. Even if the phone is 10yrs old ,but the hardware is capable of running the new software then it should be updated, it's a matter of principles. If samsung can't officially release ICS without TW coz there are people who actually love it, then do what htc did with the desire, and release a clean update without TW on their dev's forum for whoever wants it instead of giving it as an OTA , and everyone will be satisfied. Ignoring the masses is not the way, i'm pretty sure SE will win a lot of samsung users for their next devices.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] MrAndroid12:
GPU in i9000 is PowerVR! antutu gives around 2100+ without lagfix. The crappy Adreno 205 slips between PowerVR MBX lite and PowerVR 530
[Galaxy S I9000 General] rayiskon:
2100+ overall , i was only talking about 3D benchmark. i9001 on antutu scores 3400 overall ;)

Edit1: Here it says 3D graphics: 1111 , so i don't see any difference in gpu ;)

Edit2: let's not get off topic here :)

lol u don't have to act this way if u lose in a discussion, next time come up with better arguements and u won't feel this way :)
[Galaxy S I9000 General] MrAndroid12:
EDIT 2:No ICS for "SGS", so yes, indeed you should F%^* off
[Galaxy S I9000 General] uzishan:
ICS was supposed to bring hardware acceleration which means devices should run faster on ICS than on gingerbread! or any other android version.......so if we won't ever get original ics its bcs of marketing
[Galaxy S I9000 General] .Slane.:
Pathetic post...

My SGS worked very well in 2.1 (a bit laggy), in 2.2.1 and now 2.3.6 with stock Samsung ROM like 90+% of people who owned a SGS. Samsung have released plenty of stock ROM during 18 month without Google pressure. What have Android 4.0.x what made the SGS + 2.3.6 a BROKEN phone ? If people doesn't like the SGS and 2.3.x why use it ? Buy another phone (and another brand if you like) and no more come here to spam XDA Dev with this kind on whine.

Technically, bringing ICS + TW on SGS seems to need a repartition (so loosing app, data, etc. etc.) because base system is bigger. Please note that many people doesn't root (and use SGS without) and don't care about, so they can't backup / restore with Titanium or a nandroid backup in recovery when you use an advanced kernel.

We already knows that a ICS (without Touchwizz framework) can work on SGS but why bring a crippled version that REMOVE feature (Hardware acceleration on video player for example) ? Many people don't care about ICS, removing feature is more stupid that not bringing ICS that implies new internal NAND partitioning and it's risky operation and if only 10% of this doesn't work well, Samsung must handle (or not) nearly 1 million of unusable phone..

If you're in the 10% people who want the bleeding edge Android OS, if you post here you already know that CM9 will bring Android 4.0.3 or better in a near future. And stop blaming Samsung to not open some device drivers to help TeamHacksumg to support some feature, Samsung doesn't made ALL devices in the SGS and have buy chip + drivers which are closed by the manufacturer (and they're dumb), and not Samsung.

Hope to never see you here again so..
[Galaxy S I9000 General] andmail:
Samsung, you can, I know!!!
[Galaxy S I9000 General] TigerCourage:
We're all here because of this guy's fault! >>>

Dr. Martin Cooper
[HTC Sensation] mizey1990:
can sum1 teach me how to use this?

after i root can i install this and backup my stock root?

after i install root n i want to reuse my own stock root wil my stock root wipe if i wipe ? tq :)
[HTC Sensation] jampe:
what are you exactly planing to do? I'm sorry I don't really understand your question. when you describe your question a little bit better, I'm sure that someone will actually help you ;)
[Galaxy S II Themes and Apps] hvniranjan:
Hi All,

Am using Samssung Galaxy s2

I have created groups which has more than 20 contacts

Am unable to sent text messages (SMS) to more than 20 contact at once.

Is there any tweak for this? Is there any app that I can use in order to sent bulk sms to the contacts?

Thanks in advance

Niranjan

PHONE & PDA : I91OOXXKI3

CSC : I91OOKEUKD1
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] yeeson:
IML74K Kernel

Credits: turl, isaacj, Michael Huang, erasmux, Mathieu Desnoyers, ezeekiel

Special thanks to:

- cyanogen,firefart,trock79 for the JDkernel app.

- Ziggy for teaching me how to patch kernels.

- Imoseyon for general help here and there.

So, its finally here! After rigorous testing, my testers and I feel that this kernel is acceptable for release. I spent the last few days squashing bugs and optimizing the kernel, testing it, and making sure it works well on the Maguro and Toro

Features:

JDKernel Updater App

CIFS

Optimized Smartass2 Cpufreq governor

Hotplug Cpufreq governor

Optimized LagFree Cpufreq governor

Patched as close to mainline as possible (3.0.14)

Overclock to 1.35ghz

CFQ IOSCHED

Undervolted a nice amount

removed some bloat

Using EXT4 for EXT2/3

GPU O/C

FAIR_SLEEPERS

Optimized makefile

Lowered default_dirty_ratio to 10

Lowered vfs_cache_pressure to 50

Swap enabled

SLQB slab allocater

other mods too small for me to remember.

CHANGELOG:

v1.1.2: Re-did source, removed some bloat, changed to CFQ, changed to SLQB, Undervolted, optimize smartass and Lagfree govs, removed interactiveX

v1.0.0.5: Initial release

DOWNLOAD: http://db.tt/lmbJ2nT6

Source: https://github.com/jdkernel/android-omap-tuna_3.0

PS:

There are 3 ways to donate for this work (whichever works for you):

1) Donate to Michael Huang by buying SetCpu

2) Donate to your favorite charity

3) Donate to me here: http://jdkoreclipse.net/donate.php

If you have any problems and need to hit me up in real time, go to my IRC channel here: http://jdkoreclipse.net/irc.php
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] MultiCulti:
so, just to make sure .... this kernel is NOT working with 4.0.2 or?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] lordofcamster:
Thx for your work!

Use this Kernel with MONACO r8 and it runs like hell!

GTA 3 is working!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] lynxboy:
Runs like hell? I don't quite know what to make of that!? I take it the phone gets quite hot?

Regards.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] stoneyfordni:
He means fast
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] franciscofranco:
Few pointers: why do you have swap? We don't need bloody swap in this devices. BFQ scheduler? BFQ is for rotational devices, we have flash devices. Why SLAB and no SLQB or SLUB? Why smartass2? Smartass2 isn't working good, even after changing the tunables for SMP. Why interactiveX? We already have interactive and it already has a built-in sysfs screen off freq parameter. Lagfree governor? It looks like Minmax to me.

Merry christmas!