yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Jirv311:
I was wondering if anybody was working on AOSP ICS for the S2. I just came from the Captivate and of course, right when I decided to upgrade they released AOSP ICS for it. Luckily I still have my Captivate so I can play with it. :D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] eep2378:
Same here. I'm running ICS Build 10 from teamhacksung on my captivate and its amazing how nicely it performs.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] AndreaCristiano:
Well its so weird that the captivate is already running it yet the sgs 2 is have so many issues with the port
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] eep2378:
Well its simply a matter of duration. The captivate has been out for over a year and a half. The dev community there has had all that time to work through the various leaks, numerous builds(whether samsung or att approved). Basically, a lot of the problems that are being run into with the SGS II have been solved months ago for other devices(captivate, vibrant). In short, they've been at it a lot longer. Keep in mind the GS II has been out just shy of 3 months and look what the devs have already done...:D

3 months from now, there will be a whole new slew of Roms(ICS or not)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] thephoneguyusa:
+1 agree with you completely!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] mike21pr:
Yea, i came from a TMO Vibrant and ICS Passion runs like a freaking dream. Since the GS2 is such a popular device, I thought ICS was very far along till I got it myself and checked the dev forum... pity that the forgotten Vibrant has a fully working ICS and GS2 doesnt yet. Anyway im still happy with it, but ICS is the peice of the puzzle missing for me (ASOP, not that Touchwiz crap BTW)

sEnT fRoM mY ExYnOs PoWeReD MoNsTeR
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] SeanHacker:
the thing is, is that we would need a kernel. Entropy won't hack-job a kernel for this kind of a build im sure.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] wonner:
Exactly. And Entropy has expressed it several times...he won't do any hack jobs.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] CyberpunkDad:
Was reading through that thread ...some scary development there. Seems unstable in all aspects. Just my two cents.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] eep2378:
Yeah there is quite a bit of childish banter. Stealing others work, etc.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] akira02rex:
I disagree. The gs2 has been out for 8mo. The issue we have is that no devices use our chipset really - its rare so to speak. The original gs series has a port basically because of the nexus s - same hardware to an extent.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] AndreaCristiano:
All true :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] ddominator:
Does anyone want to work on an ICS port of the AT&T SGS II? The thread there is only for the international version so it may not work on ours.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] brent8577:
people already are. despite possible donations, this type of thing looks good on resumes, so being first is good. it will come. that's all probably in the other ics threads.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] eep2378:
I'm speaking of the ATT variant(I777) which came out 10/2. International variant, yes, has been out a while longer, but there are some differences in each. Yes, they share the same chipset but that hasn't stopped the Dev's in the I9100 forums from putting out solid roms. Otherwise, why would we need Hellraiser if they are that "similar".

You disagree that its just a matter of time? If so, you don't think that in another 3 months we'll have made major progress related to Roms(whether ICS or not), kernels, etc?

Edit: Just came across this new thread started by codeworkx this am:http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1410400

Looks promising :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] jake:
after reading through the thread, i am not very confident that ICS will be so smooth with the phone actually .,. lol idk why you felt promised but i am glad someone does :) i am going to be swapping this thing for a g nex ~ too much waiting for me lol
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] DJSLINKARD:
i flashed the latest alpha and it runs like a wet dream!! i just cant use it as a daily driver until they get the mic in calls working as well as the camera
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Smith7018:
Did you try to hell raise it or did you just flash it and it works minus the mic, camera, and probably the buttons? Thanks!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] eep2378:
Its not meant to be a daily driver at this point(hence alpha). That's clearly stated in the OP and throughout the thread.

BTW: I started this thread with the intentions of exposing I777 users who DON'T read the I9100 forums, so they now whats being worked on.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Smith7018:
Just a quick note, CM9 alpha is available in the regular GS2 section. Once again, anyone know if we can just flash it, hell raise, or just lease it alone? It has a 3.x kernel... :\
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] eep2378:
Yeah I linked to that thread(CM9) a few posts back. It might be wise to leave it alone for now. Wait a bit for some more stuff to get fixed.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] boardsportsrule:
http://codeworkx.de/wordpress/2011/12/25/experimental-build-of-cm9-for-galaxy-s-ii/

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=20671183

pretty coool!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Smith7018:
Ah, sorry for not seeing that. Ya, I just noticed you need the ICS boot loader, which sounds like a problem in its own right. I know January/February is close, but God damn does it sucks waiting.... Every day that passes is another day closer, I guess.

sigh, /me goes back to hibernation.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Nyk0n.:
Yeah i tried out that cm9 build it runs pretty good, of course no calls cuz of nitz and soft buttons broken on our phone. Was easy enough, just flash the cwm zip and reboot.
[Samsung Galaxy Mini] badung81:
any one have youtube apk... please share it ..thanks.
[Samsung Galaxy Mini] nishanty13:
It can be found on market or just by Googling it

-------------------------------------------
[Samsung Galaxy Mini] badung81:
When i go to market youtube is installed,but in my phone no have youtube app...
[Samsung Galaxy Mini] galaxyminipop:
Try this:

www.4shared.com/file/IwEXeh0Q/YouTube_Downloader__251__2.htm

sent via galaxyminipop.blogspot.com
[Samsung Galaxy Mini] badung81:
ok thank you 4 shared ..... but i have alredy youtube apk
[Samsung Galaxy Mini] jrandroid:
You google it sir , "youtube apk" or you can search on market its there.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] deathpulse:
Hello everyone! I just took the plunge and ordered my Note from Amazon. I am a former Dell Streak/DJSteve user who has been forced to use the Samsung Infuse with MIUI for the past 6 months and I could NOT be happier about the Note.

When it arrives tomorrow, what are the steps I should take to ensure maximum compatibility with AT&T's network/speeds? What configurations settings should I modify? Lets start an AT&T optimization thread :).

I anticipate rooting the device as soon as I turn it on - any suggestions for a custom ROM/Radio while you are at it?

Thank you all in advance for the tips AT&T users!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] GenghisKhent:
I'm another refugee from the Dell Streak 5, for which DJ Steve could do only so much. You'll like the Note much better.

I can't comment on rooting. Let me start the ball rollling on getting you going on AT&T.

I popped into my Note the SIM I was using on my Streak. Others can correct me if I'm wrong, but you don't need a special "4G SIM" since the Note is not an LTE phone.

Next relates to your plan. Your post doesn't say what it is. I'm on a metered 4G Smartphone plan. Others have grandfathered unlimited plans. In any event, you need a compatible plan. The one you had for the Streak (assuming it was on AT&T) should work.

Third is the APN. There are a ton of posts in this forum on this issue. The wap.cingular APN works fine (if you can't find configuration I can point you to a link) but it is only 3G. You want the phone APN for HSPA+. But ... you need to be properly provisioned for that APN. Just having the SIM and the plan aren't enough.

if you call customer service, when they look up your IMEI, you won't be provisioned for the phone APN, just wap.cingular. (You can tell by the SOC for your data plan but that is a whole another discussion). Call tech support, nicely explain the situation. You'll need to give them an IMEI from an AT&T 4G phone. I used the IMEI for the Infuse (easily findable through a Google search). The tech then could provision me for the phone APN (if you can't find configuration I can point you to a link). I wrote here about this experience on my blog, and the AT&T tech even responded with a comment!

Hope this helps.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Jade Eyed Wolf:
If you're grandfathered into an unlimited plan, stick with the wap.cingular apn. The newer apn's are regulated much more closely. You'll still get HSPA+, but your speeds probably won't go much higher than about 6mbit at best, which is more than enough for most things really.

The other thing to do is disable fast dormancy. From the dialer, enter in *#*#9900#*#* and disable fast dormancy.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] GenghisKhent:
If you are metered rather than unlimited (can't tell from your post) I would think regulation would be a non-issue as you pay through the nose if you go over your limit. Also, I believe that theoretically the phone APN has a higher HSPA+ limit than the wap.cingular APN. Nevertheless, in practice my experience so far (in the Los Angeles area) is that the phone APN and the wap.cingular APN have similar speeds. So even if you are metered, you might want to skip going through the bother of provisioning to the phone APN as long as your speed is OK for your purposes on wap.cingular.

Definitely good advice. I forgot that one.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ericshmerick:
I'm on grandfathered data and have never noticed speed differences between the APN settings floating around on the net. It's not a 4G phone, so at max, any APN will give HSDPA+ (i.e. fake 4G) speeds any way you slice it.

I'm just using wap.cingular and it works well enough.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] GenghisKhent:
ericshmerick was the guy who got AT&T to recognize the GTN-7000 as a phone so we could have voice + data. When I called AT&T yesterday and gave them my Note's IMEI, they knew it was a phone, not a tablet. We all owe ericshmerick a lot of thanks, since now all we have to do is pick and choose among APNs, as opposed to dealing with AT&T trying to kick us off the voice network.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Jade Eyed Wolf:
+1

Indeed! Major kudos to Eric ^_^
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ericshmerick:
Thanks guys. It's hard to take credit for something that was broken to begin with. I just emailed and called a few people who probably wondered how I found their information (google is amazing).

But since AT&T has fixed their issues, we can all celebrate and use this awesome smartphone as it was designed.

Enjoy!
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Namuh:
So I'm on a 2GB a month plan. Is wap.cingular ok or should I change it? If so, change it to what? And what does dormancy do?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] p51d007:
Just got mine around lunch from UPS, threw the battery in just to

fire it up. WOW! Screen is clear as a bell & bright.

Mine came from Germany via Amazon. Sealed Note box, inside a box

with the adapter & instructions to set it to English.

It will get all setup tonight.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Jade Eyed Wolf:
On the 2GB plan, you should use the Phone apn. You'll get the best speeds that way. Just do a search for the correct settings on the Phone apn, and make sure that your account is provisioned for 4G. I believe you need to make sure that it using the "HSDPB" SOC code.

As for fast dormancy, you should disable that by entering *#*#9900#*#* in your dialer and disabling it from the menu that comes up. Basically, fast dormancy is a feature that some networks use in order to more quickly transition from an idle UMTS state all the way up to HSPA+ and back to idle again (when the connection isn't being used for a period of time). The idea behind this feature is to a) conserve battery life on your device and b) more efficiently scale and distribute available bandwidth between you and the cell tower. However, as AT&T does not use this feature on their network, having it enabled on your device can have a negative effect on your battery life in addition to making your data connection more erratic and generally slower (because there's wasted overhead being transmitted). The effect of disabling fast dormancy while on AT&T is that you'll notice the initialization time for your connection from idle to active will be slightly longer, but once active, it will stay at the highest available transmission rate (HSPA+) for longer before going back to idle instead of rapidly going between 3G, H, and H+ all the time.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] GenghisKhent:
I'm not positive, but I believe that SOC code is for unlimited plans. Mine is a metered plan, and my new SOC code is HSSMT7. Once my SOC code changed to that, I was able to access the phone APN. Before I could not.

I'm curious if anyone else with a metered plan can confirm the different SOC code.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] QuarterToNine:
I'm on the 2GB Smartphone plan for 4G and my code, assuming I'm looking in the right place in my bill, is HSSM. I had to view my data plan details for my prior month billing to find it. But, I'm not sure that's the correct code because nowhere do I see the acronym SOC.

In any case, I'm using the "phone" APN settings and I get 6.6 down and 1.0 up.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] GenghisKhent:
I view my SOC code by the following method which I learned somewhere on this incredibly useful forum:

1. Log on to my AT&T Wireless account.

2. Choose Manage Features.

3. On the next displayed page, find and choose the hyperlink to your data plan. Mine is called DataPro 2 GB for Smartphones on 4G.

4. On the resulting popup window, take a look at the URL, particularly the end, which shows the SOC code. My URL ends: olamexecute?selectedFtrSoc=HSSMT7

Admittedly this roundabout way of viewing your SOC code is sort of like driving from LA to SF by way of NY. Reportedly there is an easier way viewing your data details, but if that alternative works, I can't figure out how to use it. Perhaps one of the countless more knowledgeable people on this forum can chime in.

FWIW, the very helpful AT&T tech who helped me provision my account so I could use the phone APN told me that the actual SOC code wasn't that critical, there were several that would get me to where I wanted to go (the HSPA+ fast lane).

Hope this helps.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] QuarterToNine:
Thanks! I'm on HSSMT7. Also, it's good to know that the SOC code isn't that critical. Thanks again.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] GenghisKhent:
You're welcome. One caution. I'm relating what the AT&T tech told me (about the actual SOC code not being that critical). He seemed knowledgeable as well as helpful. But I can't 100% confirm. Though after his change I had no problem accessing the phone APN.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Jade Eyed Wolf:
Good point. I hadn't thought of that.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Namuh:
Hmm thats weird my code is olamexecute?selectedFtrSoc=LTESMT2....I used my wifes APN settings from her skyrocket and I get way faster download results in speedtest from 1.92mbs to 6.0mbs, but it times out in the upload phase of the test. MMS works, text works, phone calls work and internet works. I'm gonna try the "phone" apn settings next. Her skyrocket APN name is ATT pta. We don't have 4g LTE in our area yet. I'm on the 2GB 4g LTE data plan (I had a skyrocket too and returned it) and so is she. I also have AT&T's LTE provisioned SIM card in my Note kept over from my skyrocket. Should I call tech support and have my IMEI provisioned for HSPA+?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] GenghisKhent:
Namuh, I'll let better minds than mine answer that. My advise is to hold off until you get those answers. Once you go back you may never go back, if you know what I mean.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Namuh:
On the phone with tech support. My account is provisioned for 4G Hspa+. under a different imei number than the note though. They did give me the option to replace the imei number that is on my account with the Notes imei number. Not sure what to do. She told me that her supervisor told her that the only apn settings she could give out is wap.cingular because its an international phone. But wap.cingular only gives 3g speeds right? I'm in an Hspa+ area. I'm off the phone with tech support. I'm going to wait on a reply in this thread or other threads to see if I should have them apply my Notes imei to my account.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] GenghisKhent:
Again there are better minds than mine, but I'd say "Just say no!" The Note IMEI, at least for me, did not provision me to the phone APN. I had to use an Infuse IMEI. So there is a third alternative to (1) doing nothing and keeping your skyrocket IMEI and (2) switching your Notes IMEI, which is (3) using the IMEI of still another device besides the skyrocket and the Note, such as the Infuse, or maybe something else. Curious what better minds think.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] onalfonso:
Hi, I ordered a Galaxy Note from Amazon, it gets here on Wednesday.

The difference with you guys is that I will be using this phone in Mexico with the carrier "Telcel". They use the same frequencies than AT&T but different APN Settings.

I have a voice and 3G with them. I hope I can get it to work :S

Sometimes I have to travel to the USA. Will I need to change the APN settings when I go in roaming mode?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Namuh:
Nevermind his post, he doesnt even have the note in his hands yet. Lets figure out my problem first lol Just kidding onalfonso! :D so Im using the "phone" apn and the seperate wap mms apn and everything works but Im getting slower speeds (1.2mbs) on speed test though.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] QuarterToNine:
My account is provisioned under the imei of my sgs2 for 2gb/month - 4G plan. On my Note I can use either the phone or wap.cingular apns and get 6.6mbps down. Although that information may not solve your issue it may be a bit to help make the correct choice. You may also be in an area where faster speeds are not possible.

Also, be sure to turn off/on your phone between setting changes.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Skiddledank:
My SOC (using the aforementioned method to determine) is HSSMT7 I currently have a 2Gb data plan with unlimited messaging and any mobile to mobile.

I had AT&T provision my sim for a GII and received a white and orange card that doesn't say 4g on it so I don't know if they sent me the wrong card or not. I had gone through a very frustrating time just trying to get the card, it took over two weeks with the last tech I talked to finally just sending it to me overnight Fed Ex. I do not know if my location (Central Florida, east coast) makes a difference but following has been my experience thus far...

When I use the Phone APN, I can send and receive text...and data such as going to the net, I cannot however send media in messaging.

When I switch to the wap APN I can do it all. I don't understand why it would be different for me as it would seem everyone else with this SOC can use the Phone APN. So it has me wondering if they provisioned the wrong sim (not even sure if that's possible) is it my location? or have the others here just not tried to send any media via text as without doing so, one would think the Phone APN to work just fine because in all other respects it would.

edit: Wondering now if this might be the problem...anyone else with a tiered data plan have this...Data GPRS MB WAP/BBRY/ISP 2GB DOM $10.00/1GB ADDL - HSSMT2GBH under INDIVIDUAL TEXT/DATA MESSAGES in their My Wireless Usage tab?

It looks like I'm provisioned for a Blackberry no?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] reinbeau:
I haven't seen a link yet to this sticky thread in the Note General forum: [GUIDE] Getting your unlocked Note fully functional on AT&T (including MMS)]. I think many of answers can be found there.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Skiddledank:
Yes, read that, that's what I went by to setup the APN's in the first place but most peeps in that thread are coming from unlimited plans, I chose this thread because most in it are on the tiered data plan...different SOC's and all.

I'd like to know what people on a tiered data plan have in their My Wireless Usage section of their accounts, if they have BBRY in there or not as that seems suspect to me.
[Motorola Milestone Android Development] mohitrocks:
Hey everyone,

An early ICS build has been created for the Droid, and if the droid is getting 71mb of free ram while running ICS, I believe our milestones can handle it too. I'm not a developer by any means, and I have seen kabaldan write about the limitations in terms of hardware, but if it is possible on the droid, could it potentially be ported to the milestone despite the bootloader?

Link for ICS on Droid: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1393632
[Motorola Milestone Android Development] adome5:
+1 somebody please?
[Motorola Milestone Android Development] scores87:
I don't think it will work well on our milestone, sadly the bootloader prevents some optimizations that are very useful, but then again we have some great developers on the community so I don't know.
[Motorola Milestone Android Development] lnwtumza95:
It's maybe possible on A853. -0-
[Motorola Milestone Android Development] Rotundjere:
Yes, of course it can be build & run on our *stone* :D

please note they don't touch the kernel ^^
[Motorola Milestone Android Development] BooZon:
@lnwtumza95

is this Sense on Milestone?
[Motorola Milestone Android Development] lnwtumza95:
Yes it is,but not suitable for daily life because lack of some function and ram.

PS.Wish someone could port this to A853 :D
[Motorola Milestone Android Development] DannyDroid:
http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=19449240&postcount=62
[Motorola Milestone Android Development] LuigiC6:
Actually Kabaldan made a much more recent post saying that he is working on porting CM9 to the milestone :) Don't really feel like digging it up, but it was made in December I'm pretty sure :)
[Motorola Milestone Android Development] DannyDroid:
Yes, he did but you are missing the key point. He said he would *try*, not that it's totally doable.
[Motorola Milestone Android Development] adome5:
The link not help us!

Its from November and now we on December..

And kabdalan say ther that ICS will not get to milestone that what i understand..

So you say that cm9 will get for milestone?

I asked on cm post on this forum but he dont ansawre to me.. he dont have answare to me or what?

Please try to ask him to get a answare update(past 1 month prom then November to today Decmber..)
[Motorola Milestone Android Development] DannyDroid:
Yes, it is very helpful. Kab looked at the sources, saw what needs to be done, and reported it.

Facts do not just change over time...

Also, there is a reason the Droid and Milestone have two different dev forums.
[Motorola Milestone Android Development] mcdevtingz:
I know of two devs who are working on it...
[Motorola Milestone Android Development] kabaldan:
Porting pre-alpha builds released only in binary form, made for another device, is a waste of time.

There's still a lot of work to be done in the source to make ics builds eventually usable for our kind of devices (= older omap3 motorola phones).

Use the Source, Luke! ;P