yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] lorenzo.themax92:
The evidence is this!!!!!!!

i make accusation because all system files have the same filesize of the leaked build alpha 9 of coenteje44 , that have ANDROID 4.0.0 ( and not 4.0.3, because this rom is not 4.0.3) , and are compiled 3 weeks ago or more....i think that codeworkx says that is ok to publish the rom because it is the same of coenteje44!!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] murdoch1:
Believe what you want lorenzo, thats your opinion. Mine is this, should this have been the case codeworkx would have made it clear he didnt like it. Also knowing xda mods they would soon be on the case.

Now let the dev get on without your interuptions. Cheers.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] idesire:
Damn, and there was me dreaming that I already had a Galaxy Nexus. :p
[Galaxy S II Android Development] lorenzo.themax92:
Excuse me, but of course mine is an opinion. I just noticed that the files have the same size and do not come from Android 4.0.3, and resemble those of coenteje44 build, because this rom has the exact same bug and the same configuration .. Change the file build.prop and adding a codec and small things, don't mean that the rom is compiled from source..

I only say what I know, I do not want to make accusations ..
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bryanchapman9999:
Assuming your talking about flashing gapps....

Wipe cache and dalvik-cache first
[Galaxy S II Android Development] murdoch1:
You blatantly have made accusations however Its nearly xmas so i aint going to be arguing with you. Merry xmas....... Lets look forward to another perspective on the aosp build.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] eisdrachen:
That is so annoying if somebody flames around the forum, others flame there to. Please stop that guys, this is a forum. If you want to discuss or do other things together, join mIRC, do an own channel in any network you prefer and discuss there. This is a solution, you can do other things if you want. But do us all a favour and keep this forum alive with relevant postings and not this bull****.

Thanks mates!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] lorenzo.themax92:
Yes.. ok stop, Merry xmas. stop .. i love xda and i won't to make really accusation, because all the dev here make good work, if he copy or not.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] SaneinOne:
Try flashing it twice or hold the power button until it shuts down and then reboot.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] cTrox:
Compared Coentje's build with the one from Airbus. Almost all binary files are the same just some apps and libs are different. I attached the winmerge report as a csv file if you want to see it yourself.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] SaneinOne:
Merry Christmas, peace on earth and all that other sh!# lmao
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Paradoxxx:
Suspicious.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] lorenzo.themax92:
Oh ok, thanks for posting the file.. and now?.. anybody believe in me..and now??
[Galaxy S II Android Development] murdoch1:
Belief?

Given you didnt actually provide any such proof you basically expressed an Unsubstantiated opinion.

Again, if codeworkx feels this is a breech of his work i am sure he will seek redress. Personally, i wish the dev well in his s. earch for resolutions.

We are all here for the same reasons.... Our continued support of android and the sg2.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bryanchapman9999:
Then they are not *identical* lets move on and let Airbus do his work without this in house fighting.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] akira02rex:
Let's get some real credible developers on here (like Codeworkx) and prune out these little kids (and yes, I gaurentee they are not older than 15) who have no clue as to what they're doing.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bala_gamer:
To all the who claims this is a copycat! Do you people ever know that there was no leaked build for android 4.0.3 and the airbuuis build is 4.0.3 indeed. So stop spreading sh*t news please
[Galaxy S II Android Development] cTrox:
Well but it kind of shows that it isn't built from the source, what also explains why some things from 4.0.3 are missing.

Anyone can add some libs and apk's to a build with winzip.

The OP wrote in the first post:

Please explain that ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] FirstNoobToBrickHisPhone:
Yeah like they're any better. We're better off waiting for Samsung.!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] cTrox:
Anyone who ever built Android from the Source knows how to make a flashable zip. OP doesn't seem to: http://twitter.com/#!/ICS_for_SGS2/status/149520050498449408

:rolleyes:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bala_gamer:
Hope you can read this, before bashing someone, every devs were once starters like this, if you cant support them atleast you can stop bashing them...

The day ICS(Ice Cream Sandwich – Android 4.0) will be made open-source is not too far. Once it is out, developers around the world(including OEMs like HTC, Samsung, Sony Ericcson) will start building the source code and start rolling out the update for android devices. But what bewilders me is the need for workstations with no lesser than 16 GB RAM to build the source code(I am not kidding). Ice Cream Sandwich is a Vampire that requires twice the amount of blood that GingerBread needed.

If you want to build Ice Cream Sandwich from AOSP(Android Open Source Project), these are the preliminary numbers that you should be looking at,

6GB of download.

25GB disk space to do a single build.

80GB disk space to build all AOSP configs at the same time.

16GB RAM recommended, more preferred, anything less will measurably benefit from using an SSD.

5+ hours of CPU time for a single build, 25+ minutes of wall time, as measured on a workstation (dual-E5620 i.e. 2x quad-core 2.4GHz HT, with 24GB of RAM, no SSD).

Never had I imagined that ICS would require such heavy-duty machines to build. Folks, its time to upgrade your machines !

Source:

http://www.tabletroms.com/index.php/2011/10/23/getting-ready-to-build-ics-from-android-source-code-heavy-duty-machines-required/
[Galaxy S II Android Development] cTrox:
With that quote I wasn't bashing him for the long build time. I was just quoting that he actually said he builds from the source.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bala_gamer:
Reading your previous post, i just fealt you are bashing him, if not then no offense mate, let the other bashers read it. :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] cTrox:
No problem ;)

Look I don't want to insult anyone here but my previous experience here on XDA has just shown me that there are a lot of self-claiming developers on here who just rip off others work, claim it as their own build.

I think the evidence here is pretty strong (the matching files + the lacking 4.0.3 features even though build.prop sais so).

Sorry but I'm just stating facts here.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] sansunggalaxys2:
I will wait for the mic fix:-)

I will miss siyah kernel and sensation...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Paradoxxx:
You better read post before your. It appears its NOT a 4.0.3.

Sent from HydrOG3N MOD S2.

Technology Evolves, Android Evolves.

HydrOG3N is THE Revolution.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Asgrad:
Even after I force the rendering I still have the window rotation glitch, any other way to get rid of it??
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bala_gamer:
But actually it is 4.0.3 and to confirm it i have just restored his alpha 13 backup. Im following his progress in his twitter and his website, so actually i could confirm its geniune
[Galaxy S II Android Development] airbus360:
SDK 15? Android 4.0.3 as 4.0.1 had SDK 14
[Galaxy S II Android Development] hotid:
developer.android.com/sdk/android-4.0.3.html

;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bryanchapman9999:
However this build originated, all I can say is great work.

Its the only build out of 3 or 4 other I have tried that actually work flawlessly (apart from the mic!)

With the other builds the mobile network would constantly crash, this build (once the mic gets sorted) is a daily driver for me.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] airbus360:
Oh I can! for my older phone. With S2 its is completely different with the kernel. When I go to flash my zip it goes error. Says something about flashing a boot img failing...

For all who don't think it is 4.0.3...

It is and when downloading from the google source tree you can see Android 4.0.3-r1 downloading!! Also it is SDK 15 for the APPS and 4.0.1 has SDK 14!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] dh2311:
Right! Everyone put your flamethrowers away! I'm downloading Coentje's build and going to compare the 2 and see what I can find.

In response to some comments;

Codeworkx wasn't happy when coenteje44 released it, hence why it is now hard to find. If there was a problem with this, it wouldn't have been released, or it wont stay here long at least.

The fact that some of the APKs are the same size means nothing, google don't remake every apk on every build they do. They could very well be the same apk as the leaked build, because nothing has been done to them. The fact it has the same bug means nothing, its an Alpha build, its buggy, maybe its not been fixed yet.

Also cant find the post to quote. Someone mentioned not being able to make flashable zips. If he had used the Alpha 9 build, that was a flashable zip, so he would just have to edit it. Also, its easier for dev's to work with backups, because they are cloning everything on their phone, so no files are missed out.

I will post my comparison findings here later today, but right now I can't be arsed!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] airbus360:
You should all Appreciate that I am releasing and you are getting good ICS tastes. I am not like teamhacksung and not let out alpha's to the public. I like to offer help and work for FREE.. I am working on fix's and getting the mic. What is wrong with you all thinking otherwise. Just because my update zip's always fail doesnt mean I can't develop. Jeeese I thought XDA was a community developer site.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] dh2311:
Not 100% sure on this, but im fairly sure the problem is that the SGSII doesn't use boot.img's in CWM, you just put the kernel zimage in the zip

Trust me, more people support you than are against you, its the way XDA has gone now, too many people who know nothing about developing act like they do. I don't know that much, so I don't say anything and I think others should do. We need stricter rules in the development section, so only more senior members can post, and people who have something relevant to say.

I recommend a 3 strikes policy, 3 spam posts and your IP banned :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bala_gamer:
just came back to say the same

a few feedback to the airbus360

* sound effect setting not working in music player.

* auto rotation glitch.

Once the mic is solved ill probably shift to ics...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Flasher8:
@Airbus

Please ignore the idiot that not appreciate your hardwork...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] airbus360:
I do that but It comes with an error. I have to flash the kernel manually so I thought it is easy to just make a nandroid so that users don't get frustrated with it not flashing correctly.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] cTrox:
Like I said, I'm just stating facts and don't want to insult anyone. But please explain to me why the framework jars are exactly the same from Coentje's build (4.0.1) to Airbus' Build (4.0.3). Google most certainly changed some things in the framework with 4.0.3.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] airbus360:
I know that I have an alpha 14 coming with the new framework, I used coenje44's framework because my compiled has a lot of FC, Also there isn't any difference with the JAR files..

If you all wonder why rotation animations look bad is that the graphics aren't up to scratch with the GPU rendering
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Paradoxxx:
A Working Mic Version will get out all doubts outofme.

As for now, it just look, and have same broken fonctions as Leaked Builds.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] adversario71:
in fact,it is a developer community..but some devs or even simply users thinks they are gods of cyberspace or whatever......so,keep your execelent work and dont play on that stupid game of secrets and ghost protocol..hehehehehe....

greets;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] dh2311:
If you want to make a relevant argument, decompile the jars and compare every file inside them, if they are all identical, your point could be classed as relevant, otherwise stop stating useless points, two files can be completely different but be the same size. An sgsII rom can be the same size as a sensation rom, doesn't mean they are the same

Same logic I explained before, you cant get errors with backups, whereas flashable zips can be a right ***** to get working, for something that is being updated so frequently, backups are easier.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Paradoxxx:
So Alpha 13 Was 4.0.1?

Even the MD5? Huhuhu ;)

I didn't checked the MD5 as I don't downloaded any of the two Builds, Coentje's and airbus360's.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] exmatproton:
Come on...just let it be man! Everyone is using eachothers work. Thats the way to develop when things are getting really difficult!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bala_gamer:
No it is 4.0.3
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Paradoxxx:
I'm Joking. :)

Just checked your twitter airbus.

I saw your pics, and seems like you really compilated something. :)

Show US MORE :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] dh2311:
But with the same framework as 4.0.1, i think? But just leave it now, believe what you want to believe, if you think its fake, dont use it and leave this thread with your useless posts, this is the LAST post I will make on this issue and I hope you all stop aswell
[Galaxy S II Android Development] cTrox:
You asked for it...

Decompiled the framework.jar of both builds with baksmali. Results in attachment.

Edit:

Well that would explain it... why didn't you say that earlier?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] airbus360:
No, I used part of Coentje44's framework to fix some of the glitches K, I have a fully compiled 4.0.3 rom that is unstable without those framework files,
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Paradoxxx:
Identical. :)

You should have said that before.

That should have been more clear to us. ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] airbus360:
Just forget about. I will prove to you in my next release that is coming tonight!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] dh2311:
already been explained now, is the same framework files, but different rom still. Sorry for going mental, just im pissed off with people on here, hence why I haven't been posting much recently

DAM! just realised I said the post before this would be last :s deffinately last one for today, going to stop reading this thread now so I am not tempted to go crazy again!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Razer(x):
Well done, i'll flash this as the mic is fixed!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bala_gamer:
Excuse me!!!! Where did i said this thing is fake!! possibly a wrong quote from you i think. Im actually saying this this geniune .
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Paradoxxx:
You don't have to prove anything.

Just makes things more clear mate.

Waiting for you new build and new fixes :cool:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] dh2311:
Sorry, it wasn't aimed at you, I was adding to your quote, it was aimed at the others, who seemed to have calmed down now its been explained
[Galaxy S II Android Development] sardroid:
With working mic?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] marcelotorres:
Man, why don't U build your own rom form source?

Go there, do your best, and create your ICS-Based rom.

Or....

Stop to post useless posts.

The OP create the rom and he is spendig his freetime to build the rom for us.

He is working for FREE and not asking anything in return. he is sharing with us your work for free!

If you think you can, which I doubt very much, do better.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Flasher8:
+1
[Galaxy S II Android Development] dh2311:
Misquote? I was supporting him! Read my other posts. I wasn't complaining at the fact it was 4.0.1 framework, it was merely a statement. I'm thrilled at having ICS, I applaud the developer for his work, and putting up with this argument.

You try and help someone, and everyone flames you, geez this community has changed in the last few months
[Galaxy S II Android Development] marcelotorres:
You don't need to prove anything for anyone. You're doing your best, and we trust you. All the best and if you need something, just PM.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Paradoxxx:
Same here, if you need some help on ICS, as I've been with AospSGS2 team, I maybe could help ya ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bala_gamer:
You dont have to prove some jerks that you are good , just carry on with your awesome development works, we will wait for the builds even if it takes longer and provide some valuable feedbacks. Hope the other who questions you will soon learn. But this happens to all the new devs here :( Trust is the most needed tonic to all the new devs, hope XDA could provide that
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Chad_Petree:
Haters gonna hate, a lot of guys here ( including me) really appreciate your work, can't wait for the new version :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Razer(x):
I don't wanna act like the #1 of noobish noobs, but what's gonna change in next release?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] dh2311:
He's gonna change every single file in the rom to stop people accusing him of stealing :)

But seriously, IDK, and he mightn't either, whatever can be done will be done
[Galaxy S II Android Development] GIPAQ:
Guys, relax we all want ICS for our S2. Give airbus360 a break and support him on his efforts. I do not understand why people accuse each other in this forum. We are here to help each other and get the best out of our S2.

I would say all relax and let airbus360 work on his rom. He has nothing to prove to anyone since his doing this for free and for everyone.

Where is the Christmas Spirit!!!

I hope we can see a fully working ICS Rom for our S2 soon.

GIPAQ
[Galaxy S II Android Development] marcelotorres:
Guy I'm not against you, and I have no reason for it. But just think unnecessary to be talking about something that you do not have full assurance. I follow the work of @ airbus360 and there is no reason to doubt him. All he does is work to improve and we can use to make a decent rom, AOSP.

How would you feel if people come to doubt of your work?

Think about it.

You and no one is obliged to using and enjoying this rom or whatever. You can develop your own roms to your liking and save them for personal use, without necessarily share them.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] dh2311:
When you've been Christmas shopping all day, it doesn't exist, anything drives you mental

---------- Post added at 06:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:45 PM ----------

I understand that, but why have a go at me when I didn't do anything, I was trying to stop the useless posts that have been put on here, I admit im no developer, I have a basic knowledge, but nothing advanced enough to build a working rom from sources. I was trying to support airbus
[Galaxy S II Android Development] marcelotorres:
This is the point man, support the OP. I'm with you. Let's support the OP.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] airbus360:
Also I don't really care what people post on here even if they are off topic. I like to help the Noobs etc.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] superleeds27:
Whatc ahnges you got planned in the next release>?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Razer(x):
Just flashed, but seems like i can't download any apps from the market, what's happening??
[Galaxy S II Android Development] airbus360:
You need to re wipe data
[Galaxy S II Android Development] idesire:
@airbus 'Its a matter of wills. If your will to do good is stronger then theirs, you bring them up with you. If not then you will drown with them.'
[Galaxy S II Android Development] airbus360:
Got Kernel 3.0.9 to boot!! Thanks to @koous on twitter :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ddominator:
Best way to prove someone is not kanging is to post source code repo (github) with all the changes. It also enables for more development and help.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] qsec:
ICS_for_SGS2ICS_Samsung_GS2

@mobilegearz Its ok now; thanks to @kooud the 3.0.9 is working now :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Razer(x):
What does it mean, i mean, what's gonna change?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] airbus360:
USB storage is working and External SD! Ril is a different story :( No ril at all

Going to back port older ril to get gsm/calling/mms to work
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ambrish7:
Think of a Kernel as like a BIOS on a PC, it controls the hardware. Its like the brains of the operation. The better the kernel the easier the functionality of the phone, you then build the additional fixes around the kernel... The kernel updated provided in this ROM addresses issues outlined the first page... check there for the fixes.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] cTrox:
Do you use KP2 RIL Files? With those it seems to work for operators without NITZ support and still get a connection with NITZ enabled ones but unstable.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] SignalX:
cant wait for your next release mate :-)

thanks for your hard work on this project

it would be nice a donate button ;-)

JUST ignore silly posts mate

cheers,

SX
[Galaxy S II Android Development] eaglerazor123:
2nd Confirmation! USB Sharing working flawlessly with 3.0.9 kernel ;) :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] qsec:
Yea, try that. My provider has no NITZ support ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Dorilife:
Good to see you making progress..

But RIL "/ is the main problem of most ICS roms out for the SGS2..

Samsung and AOSP..
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bala_gamer:
What about the camera? does the kernel and ril in the kp2 leaked rom has a working mic?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Dorilife:
I'm screwed...my provider has NITZ and I get nothing but signal loops..

I hope porting over older RIL will work..:p
[Galaxy S II Android Development] airbus360:
Does anyone know if O2 have NITZ?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Remoteconcern:
It doesn't in the UK, I don't think.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] eaglerazor123:
Flashin with Old KP2 Ril files ;) And happy news is from now next builds will be Flashable Zips ;) :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] superleeds27:
So glad im on O2. But, we still won't have Mic will we?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] SharkbotJR:
This is exciting. I'm glad there is a cool Dev like you that is willing to help us noobs and share what you are working on. It gives me hope for this community. Good work!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] razor 116:
Not sure about O2 but GiffGaff runs on the O2 network and I have no issues, so I'm guessing it doesn't
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Razer(x):
This rom is working pretty good, i'm only finding some problems with apps like PowerAmp (crashing) and Root Explorer (seems to have problems with resolution) guess they've got problems with ICS, but the other things are ok!

Thank you so much!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] airbus360:
I got RIL :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] SignalX:
+1 for mic

?

SX
[Galaxy S II Android Development] idesire:
Does the same apply for tesco and giffgaff who run of the O2 network?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] sardroid:
You're GOD:)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] magote:
So the issues now are just livewp and camera? Ill says grab camera and Mali drivers and libs, hwcomposer.co included, and try to mix them with your build :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] airbus360:
Testing Mic soon, bare with me as I am off to eat now
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Razer(x):
I feel like i fell in love with you :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Asgrad:
No word on mic or camera?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] SignalX:
suuuuperb work! :D

+1 for "your'e God" too :D

THANKS

SX
[Galaxy S II Android Development] razor 116:
RootExplorer has been updated for ICS I have no issues with it, update yours through the market.