yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Motorola Droid X2] twobrare:
To answer your question you can flash another rom. But just make sure you do an android BACKUP!!!!! This is extremely important. Because if you do not like the rom and you delete it there will be no way to go back. I can tell you with experience Eclipse is a very clean rom but.... The wifi will not work for our device. It just says ERROR. If you do not use the wifi then you should be good to go. just remember to do the back up before you wipe the three areas!!!!!!!. To flash back if you need to the boot strapper in eclipse is in the section called, "eclipse parts"

I hoe that helps!

Yeah, I personally want MIUI but I am waiting for the next version. I use my camera way to much.
[Motorola Droid X2] clcrawl:
As an FYI I have modified the initial post I made with directions that worked for me. If anyone sees anything missing, or thinks something should be changed please let me know. Thanks again to everyone!
[Motorola Droid X2] clcrawl:
Would anyone have an issue if I made a new thread with the subject of HowTo: for reference for people visiting these forums? I don't want to create another thread to clutter the main page, but it might be more descriptive than the title I initially used.
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] partyk1d24:
Alright so I am playing around with my Logitech Revue, and I can connect via ADB is there a way I can use this to DL the files I need to compile the platform?

Also more generally without the use of applications like diff and grep what is the best way to analyze what files are necessary to pull down for a port.

So basically here are my skills...

I can build a platform using the source found at s.android.com

I can adb into my Logitech Revue

so how do I create a system image and flash my existing revue adding an additional system application (call it SampleApplication)

Thanks guys

P.S. If you want to connect...

1.) go into you Google TV and set your remote debugger to be the IP of the computer running adb.

2.) adb connect <IP of GOOGLE TV>

3.) adb shell

4.) profit???????
[Huawei Ideos X6] kshitij_bhatt:
Hey everyone i m seriously facing this issue of mms since i need to send pics to my friends not having smartphone bt having mms facility bt i cant do it with my android ... not only ideos x6 bt any android ... on ideos x6 no stock rom no miui no cm7 can send mms or receive one can anyone solve this problem ??
[Huawei Ideos X6] yourpappa:
Yes did somebody find a solution to this problem
[Huawei Ideos X6] natsuke:
I've found out that the gingebread setting for mss is different from the froyo setting.

1st, make sure that you already have set you APN for mms through the mobile network setting. And try to send MMS. If there is popup state that the service is unvailable, here it why i will do.

I will go back to Mobile Network setting, there is option on the top that state Data Enable, if it is disable, just enable it. If it is enable, disable it for more than 10sec, than re-enable it. Do this everytime you get the 'no service available' pop up.
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] FPJ:
Ive been hearing a lot about camera mods and was wondering if there was one that would work with my phone.
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Zeinzu:
Do you have an Epic? What kind of camera mod are you looking for?
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] FPJ:
Well i didnt know there was more than one...I just thought there was one that would improve quality of audio and video, maybe pics ? And yes i have the Epic 4g.
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Zeinzu:
I don't believe there is. Only mod I know of disables the shutter sound for the camera.
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] KennyG123:
HD Camera from the market seriously improves the pix quality.
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] FPJ:
Would this work?

http://www.inspiredgeek.com/2011/06...rate-video-stereo-audio-quality-other-tweaks/
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] RandomKing:
I'm not sure, but the last time I tried to use an SGSII Camera app on the Epic , the shutter button would glitch it out.

What app is this? I ran a search but can't find it.
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] KennyG123:
Oops, left out a letter HDR Camera, sorry. It seems to take 2 or 3 quick shots and merges the pixels for an awesome HD picture.
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ac16313:
Yup I use this app to. It takes one I believe saturated picture one less saturated and on with no edits and combines them, the only thing is that camera shutter noise!
[General Questions and Answers] Raikalo:
My employer has a wireless access point that is used strictly for shipping and inventory of supplies and products. They mainly use WinMo-based barcode scanners, but my employer wants me to set up a company netbook that runs Windows 7. They gave me a copy of the wireless profile, exported from the barcode scanners. How can I import the settings to Windows 7?

I tried just adding the registry key (the exported profile) to the registry in Win7, but it didn't show up after adding it.

I would just ask the IT dept. for the wireless key, but the ones I'm in contact with on my shift are already off for the holidays.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] distraught:
Hi,

I apologize in advance if this is stupid...

I have a Samsung Galaxy S2 from Telus (Hercules). After about a week of using my stock ROM, I switched to Juggernaut 3.7 to address issues with my security lock and improve battery life.

With my stock Telus ROM, Voice Command and Speech Input was working REALLY well, it was able to very accurately interpret my voice for phone calls, navigation, searches, emails, etc. I was extremely impressed! But now that I've flashed the Juggernaut ROM, the Voice Command and Speech Input seems to be very inaccurate and virtually unusable.

Would there be any reason for this? Or is it coincidence that I was testing with easily recognizable words when I was using my stock ROM? Is there anything I can do to improve this?

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] Blue1k:
Weird. I'm running Juggs as well on my Telus phone and it seems to work fine (samsung voice app).

What kernel are you running?
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] distraught:
Thanks for the reply!

My kernel version is:

2.6.35.11

Bullet-1.8Ghz-v2.7b #42

SMP PREEMPT Tue Nov 22 19:07:07 EST

2011

Is there any way to tell the voice input engine version? Is it a common engine that is used for all apps? (Google Voice Search, Voice Command, Voice Talk, Speech Input)? Is there a way to train it?
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] Blue1k:
I'm running bullet 2.9. Are you having issues with the google voice search or the samsung one which dictates messages?
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] distraught:
I primarily use Voice Talk - so the chance of error when doing stuff like calling from your contact list should be quite small, but it almost always comes back with the "i did not understand" message
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Chubby_Skunk:
I have a Motorola Atrix right now and was looking to buy the Skyrocket. I had the Samsung Captivate and really loved Samsung's Android devices.

Some questions I have about the phone:

-The Galaxy Nexus has a 720p screen, since the Skyrocket only has a WVGA screen, does that mean less icons on the screen?

-We don't have LTE in Seattle yet, but how is the battery life while on HSPA? And how is it on LTE?

-Since the processor that is in the Galaxy S II isn't compatible with LTE, is Qualcomm's dual-core as fast and smooth?

-Is the camera take good pictures, and is the video quality good?

Thanks for those who help! :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] GalaxySkyrocket500:
Okay... Nexus is junk...next

I get 24-28+ hours on my LTE..

Snapdragon is more than capable for anybody's needs.. if all you want to do is do benchmarks, quadrants and play games all day.. Exynos is better. But we are in the real world so....

Camera is awesome.. this phone is awesome.. buy the phone and have fun.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Chubby_Skunk:
Perfect, the short but to the point answers.

Thanks so much! :D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] offwiththeface:
Hell yes you should buy it chubby skunk
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] offwiththeface:
Oops sorry how do I delete that?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] waiters:
Umm this phone kicks ass, but the camera sucks...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] DoctorQMM:
I installed one of the i9000 camera hacks (volume button shutter) and pic and video quality is awesome. Here's a link to my post and the camera.apk

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=20514178&postcount=3
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] slimslim:
Chubby_Skunk, I remember you from the Atrix forums :-). LTE is the way to go, impressive when you're under coverage. The battery life is great even on the Vivid. I went for the Vivid, the screen is the same qHD as the Atrix.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Chubby_Skunk:
I remember you too! haha

I was going to go for the Vivid until I read reviews about it.... :(

So I wanted the Galaxy S II and the Skyrocket seems like i'd be to big with the 4.5" screen and the AT&T GSII seems nice with the 4.3" screen.

Is there much of a noticeable difference between the 4.3" and 4.5"? it's only.2" bigger.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] slimslim:
Is not that big of a difference (size wize), but I would go for the Skyrocket, is newer and have LTE. Make sure you read first what users are saying about the screen though, I've heard there are some pretty bad batches out there.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Chubby_Skunk:
of the Skyrocket? or the AT&T GS2?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] GalaxySkyrocket500:
Appartently some people are saying the "screen" is not good...

I don't have any issues, nor do any of the 10 buddies of mine who own the same phone..
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] iSeeNubs:
I was skeptical about switching from iPhone 4 to the Skyrocket due to its enormous size difference. After using for a day or two, I got used to it and the 4.5 inch screen really made a difference for me. However if you're switching from an OGS2, then it won't be that big of a difference but still good.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] ampm325:
Girlfriend has the 4s, and she doesnt need to ask siri which is a better phone. i have had both att gs2's. The skyrocket is faster but the other is more refined. i like them both, but like skyrock speed
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] ckck543:
hey, my dad actually has the iphone 4 and he says all the time "hey whats that on your phone" because this phone is just so capable. I came a Sony arc and the speed alone should be enough to get this phone :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Primenay:
Hahaha almost died laughing :D at your post
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] icenight89:
please attempt to pay a little more attention to last post date my friend, this thread is 4 months old
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] ckfmunoz:
24-28 hours on LTE?

I'm impressed.

May I ask what ROM you are using that achieves this battery life?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] chappatti:
I have the Skyrocket and overall I think I made a mistake getting it.

** The skyrocket is a hastily put together phone. The plain SGS II is actually a better built phone. Even the Captivate was a much better built phone.

**The only reason for the Skyrocket hardware is to enable LTE for AT&T. The plain SGS II gives you 4G which should be more than enough, since LTE IS NOT AVAILABLE at most areas.

** The plain SGS II has far superior screen resolution.

** The exynos processor in plain SGS II even at 1.2 GHz is so much better.

** Unless you ABSOLUTELY want LTE, Skyrocket has not shattering advantage.

** The Skyrocket HD of course is a different question altogether.

** AND the HTC One X has the same specs as Skyrocket, with a HD screen and may be something to consider. Check this phone out too. http://www.mobilenapps.com/articles/1769/20120420/htc-one-x-release-date-att-may.htm#

Good luck !
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] icenight89:
Sorry, I think all ur main points are wrong frankly.

1) Build quality and quality control of the skyrocket has been excellent so far

2) I have access to 4g and LTE everywhere I go in all of Ontario, and let me tell u for what I use my phone for, late makes a WORLd or difference, 4g isnt even in the same league. This us basically just ur opinion

3) better screen resolution? where'd u find this info? link please?

4) find benchmarks showing me that exynos slaps the S3 1.5, please. Cuz I guarantee u won't. Sure if all u do is run benchmarks all day, yeah ifs faster. but in real world use u won't even be able to notice the difference. I'll take a pentaband radio that I can use on any carrier over 5% not even noticeable performance increase.

5) again ur opinion, see second point

6) skyrocket HD is same phone, better screen... so I don't understand this one

7). HTC One X has no SD card slot for expandable storage and lacks a removable battery, HUGE turnoffs for me ans several other users here, plus its HTC, and it may or may not come with a locked boot loader. Our dev took off out of the box, becuz we had no obstacles. Sammy's are definately the best for custom stuff.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] deezhemi:
+1
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] jaymony:
Yes

I agree
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] xcrazydx:
ALL WRONG!!!! see below
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] chappatti:
Let me start with the more important matters. Here are some side by side comparison comments:

"Despite the extra gigahertz, the Exynos processor outperforms the competing Qualcomm dual-core chip…. the Snapdragon S3′s Adreno 220 is a major downgrade from the Mali-400 in the Exynos.

http://briefmobile.com/att-skyrocket-to-feature-snapdragon-s3-not-exynos-processor "

"hardcore gamers may miss the Mali-400 GPU inside of the AT&T Galaxy S II and other Samsung phones, most will be perfectly happy with the still powerful Adreno 220 inside the Snapdragon S3.

http://briefmobile.com/review-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-skyrocket-att "

" Cons

Extremely low resolution

No Exynos processor, unlike other Galaxy S II devices "

" In our speed tests, the Galaxy S II, although an “older” device by industry standards, ran out ahead thanks to its dual-core 1.2GHz Exynos processor. Even though the Skyrocket comes equipped with a 1.5GHz processor, the dual-core offering from Qualcomm isn’t quite as powerful.

http://www.technobuffalo.com/comparisons/galaxy-s-ii-vs-skyrocket-smartphone-smackdown-video/ "

2. If you are on AT&T, like me, you would realise that LTE is no big deal. For all the headache in NEW YORK CITY to keep a proper 4G, let alone LTE, is not a big reason to go with an "LTE" phone. With Rogers in Canada, you may a lot more lucky than us AT&T suckers. So its not just my opinion.

3. My wrong words. I should been more specific and said better graphics.......see above.

Even at 480 x 800, every review agrees that this is so low for phones nowadays......and as an upgrade this does not make sense.

4. See above on processor performance......

5. If the processor on SGS II and graphics are performing better, and LTE SUCKS on AT&T as an AT&T customer, why would you chose the SKR....I fell for that assuming LTE would be good. It makes no difference in NYC, NY state or Connecticut.

6. The Skyrocket HD is definite improvement on screen, so automatically is better than Skyrocket. So what's the argument there.

7. For HTC One X, I said specifically, "with a HD screen and may be something to consider". If you are comparison shopping, other brands besides Samsng are out there with similar specs (hardware).

This business of SD card, and battery etc. is like the Asus Transformer vs Acer Iconia tablets. Iconia has built in USB, and other stuff, but Asus is so much more popular because of it CORE performance abilities. This also is easily verified on Google....

To get carried away by sexy "specs" alone is not often the best way......

EDIT: Oh yeah, another effect of the hardware shift is Skyrocket has poorer GPS than SGS II. It is not a deal breaker, but is definitely a negative.

THE WHOLE REASON FOR THE SKYROCKET ON AT&T IS FOR AT&T TO PUSH ITS LTE. The SGS II hardware is NOT compatible with LTE, so they had to switch to Qualcomm.......BUT TO MAKE IT LOOK A LITTLE DIFFERENT THEY USED 1.5 GHz processor.

C'mon folks, IN THE USA, this phone was not INDEPENDENTLY conceived by Samsung. It was made SPECIFICALLY for AT&T. AND to keep one step ahead of T-mobile's version.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] kr3w1337:
Why would you buy a phone that's a year old anyways?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] icenight89:
Alright, let's rebutle your main points.

1.) I don't know where that site gots its information, but look here:

http://nena.se/nenamark/view?version=2

These are user submitted through the application. The adreno 225 and 220 stomp on everything, including the Mali-400. Please also remember that these benchmarks are run WHILE the gpu is constantly upscaling and rendering at a higher resolution.

Just to drive this point home, here is a link of video game rendering on a adren 220:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBBMVc9-fuk

Here are actual proof benchmarks:

http://www.phonearena.com/news/Samsung-Galaxy-S-II-Skyrocket-benchmark-tests_id23514

I did say that the exynos was faster, but i also challenged you to find proof that the exynos slaps the S3, meaning significantly faster... you did not.

2.) This point is irrelevant, as it is, yet again, personal experience. Several users in this forum have posted INSANE speeds from Texas, Florida, and the like.

3.) See Above

4.) See Point 1

5.) Again this is area specific to you. Unfortunate, but true.

6.) I agreed with you on this point, but you made it seem like the build quality on the skyrocket was garbage and the hd was going to be so much better? The only difference is the screen.

7.) But that's exactly my point, which you so graciously stated. All the things i named have nothing to do with CORE SPECS, which are nearly identical. The screen may be HD, but not enough of a bump up to excuse all the other flaws. What if someone needs more than 16gb of internal storage? Or is a very heavy user and burns out the battery in 6 months? Pay for a repair? Why, when you can simply remove the back cover and slap a new one in.

As for your last add-in, that's incorrect, im sorry. They chose the Qualcomm SOC not because they wanted to look different and havea "1.5", but because it was the fastest one at the time that supported LTE. They surmissed, and rightly so, that the slight loss (only measurable by synthetic benchmarks) in cpu performance was worth the gain in mobile data speeds.

It was not carrier specific, it was a strategic move by Samsung. Even now we are still waiting for a exynos LTE chipset, and it has been what, roughly 6 months since the skyrocket release? It was very successful and well received, enter the galaxy note.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] tomtommy306:
Since everyone has a take on this, here's my thoughts...

I bought the skyrocket only because they didn't have the i777 in stock. I knew the exynos was a better all around chip, and I liked the build of the i777 better.

I had to purchase in store because I used my wifes upgrade, so I was limited at what I could do.

Now that I have the skyrocket, I'm pretty happy overall with it.

There are a lot of things I would have rather had from it. Number one was the feel of the phone is a little cheap to me. It is a fairly sturdy phone, but it doesn't feel like that to me in the hand. Secondly is the exclusion of major development like CM or MiUi. Those were the main reasons I wanted the i777 to begin with.

All of this being said.... I get an upgrade again in a few months and already have plans to move on to something else. I may keep or sell my 727 but it has been a decent phone to toy with. I missed cm7 and now I have cm9 on an aria thats much older and would have liked to see it as well on the rocket.

So in the end I'll call it like I see it: The Skyrocket is the stepkid of the galaxy s II series and in being such has suffered in numerous ways.

These are all my opinions and should only be viewed in that way. Sorry for the EXTRA long post..... needed to vent.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] chompy630:
Honestly if I was you I would just wait for the galaxy s3 they are unveiling it soon from what I've read and it should be a better phone overall.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] chappatti:
Ok...since people like numbers: Here is a direct quote from the website in the above rebuttal: From http://www.phonearena.com/news/Samsung-Galaxy-S-II-Skyrocket-benchmark-tests_id23514

"However, we do notice that it’s only a notch down from the performance that’s exhibited by the AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II – though, it’s negligible."

Simply put: 1.5Ghz Snapdragon = 1.2 Ghz Exynos right?

Huh? :)

The defense rests its case !
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] :
My lte spanks the dog crap out of the 3.5g bahaha I've been as high as 40mb in Indianapolis guys "Indianapolis" come on the red headed stepchild state aside from maine
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] icenight89:
And from both my original post and the one u JUST quoted, I succeeded that, I never claimed snapdragon to be faster. Quite the contrary, I did state exynos to be faster. I challenged u to prove it was significantly so, and u could not. My point was that the difference was negligable.

As for your lack of a rebutle for the rest of my arguments, and i guess u admit defeat? U are of course entitled to your opinion, but the majority votes in my favour my friend.

*#* Google dropbox, its useful.

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTcwNDE0ODUyOQ *#*
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] icenight89:
I have the phone in a case, so the smoot back doesn't affect me, but I can see what u mean by it possibly posing an issue.

I still disagree with build quality, when clasped in, the battery cover s solid and almost feels like one piece.

GPS on STOCK skyrocket AND gs2 is crap at best. Not so much a hardware issue as a software one. AGPS path fixe this problem.

I will also agree that the audio on both phones is crap. This is a known issue.

As I again state, your gpu isn't as good as ours, my benchmarks proved it. This will only become more obvious when an official Inc is released for our phone.

Let it be know that on some level, I understand that the skyrocket was released to fill a gap. Exynos LTE still hasn't been released, and the skyrocket has been out for months. But, the open NEVER posted a question about migration from s2 to skyrocket, it was atrix > skyrocket.

My advice, if want LTE and see none of the points of disagreement between myself and chappati an issue, get a skyrocket. If u do, wait for the S3, guaranteed to be bad ass.

*#* Google dropbox, its useful.

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTcwNDE0ODUyOQ *#*
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] chappatti:
Hey, ice, it was fun man !! :D:D Please don't take anything personal.....Big props to you for sticking with the debate. It was very informative for me, and I hope others will take some info from it.

FOR THE RECORD: I HAVE THE SKYROCKET, TOO, in white !! :D:D

Happy xda-ing !!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] icenight89:
Dude, no worries! :D. I didn't take any of it as a personal attack, and I'm glad u didn't either. Its great to see someone else on these forums capable of having a discussion and sticking to it, focusing on arguments and points of contrast, rather than stooping to an online verbal pissing match.

I knew all along u had a skyrocket, from other posts you've made lol. After being here for awhile, u remember the more prominent members.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] :
Hey winning pissing matches is an art bro lol