yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] GuestK00250:
this is really a bad idea. why should 9001 mix with 9000? both is a totally different phone. And not only that, by doing this, it will make us 9001 user difficult to find themes and tweak. because 1) it is messy now that 9001 has been mix with 9000. 2) we need to go page by page to see if there is any new themes or mod for our phone. Take for example today the ICS theme for 9001 in 9000 thread is in page 2. Then if there is a new tweak, the thread will be buried by 9000 thread and end up few pages behind as the users 9000 are more active.

previously everything is so much easier, i log in and i can look at first page of the thread to see if there is any new tweaks or themes. Now looks like it has been moved to some other sections which are not really related to our phones.

please think bout this.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] broncogr:
I am sorry but this is how things are going to work out from now on.

This is a development subforum and as such it should contain only development.

This has been heavily discussed before it was implemented.

Everyone should use the [9001] prefix in the other forums which will make things easier.

Cheers
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] sakindia123:
i have an idea

Y not make a stock,which will link to all guides/themes/other useful threads?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] nikagl:
One big question: what is development? Themeing is development (of content) too, and much theming stuff also contains development within the APK's...

Still someone that maintains those threads will need to keep that topic up to date...
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] broncogr:
Ok then someone can make an index thread which I will stick in the 9001 dev forum that wil lcontain all the links to themes and so on in the other forums.

Mind you this thread will need to be maintained a lot so the one who will make such a thread will need to be commited to it.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] broncogr:
Development in our case is Rom and Kernel development.

Also some mods can be allowed.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] reneph:
Started a thread here: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1405623
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] broncogr:
Ok, thread is now stickied.

Mind you this thread will need constant maintenance

Cheers
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] pyronia:
Huhu...so sad, there will be no dedicated forum to i9001...its like we not exist...sobs sobs....its a awesome...

i9001-2.3.6 zskp6|FeaCore_Phoenix

Adrenaline Shot v13|Instanet 3G Free
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] GuestK00250:
at least now is better. thanks broncogr and reneph :)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] nikagl:
Why not just remove the word Development of the forum name and leave all I9001 threads in here. Honestly, in my opinion you guys are taking up way too much work - you'll be continuously moving threads from 1 forum to the other :(
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] broncogr:
I am sorry but this is what has been decided.

Xda-developers exists firtsly for development and then for all the other sections.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] rayiskon:
the forum looks way better now-in terms of organization, thanks for that ;) i hope u're aware that u will still have a lot of work to do here coz every hour we get 1-2 non dev related threads :D
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] broncogr:
I will move threads as needed.

But from now on posts made here not related to development will lead to infractions for their posters...

Also please report all posts in the subforum not related to development. It will make my life easier...
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] nikagl:
And if I offer to be moderator for the 9001 forums?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] rayiskon:
There are enough mods for this section, but broncogr is the first one who decided to organize this forum with an iron fist :D
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] broncogr:
It doesnt work exactly like that mate.

You need to apply to be a mod and right now applications are closed.

Then your application must be reviewed by the moderator commitee and so on...

Here is the link for future reference though:

http://www.xda-developers.com/announcements/want-to-be-a-moderator-at-xda-developers-com/
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] broncogr:
You can find the list of assigned mods for any forum at the right hand side bottom of the forum page
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] nikagl:
Haha, didn't really want to be a mod, was just trying to find a solution to our problem :) it's just the way it is, and I'm sure we'll manage :D
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] valenti9:
finally a mod...thx broncogr, forums gonna be less messy now! sick of those newbie question popping up in dev...
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] RapGame:
seriously why not make a new forum just for 9001 like 9000 has? it would be much easy to find stuff.. now is gonna be a mess just trying to find new stuff.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] broncogr:
It has already been said that a new forum will not be created for 9001.

Sorry
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] mitcoes:
9001 and 9000 Apples and Pears

I9000

Chipset	Hummingbird

CPU	1 GHz Cortex-A8

GPU	PowerVR SGX540

I9001

Chipset	Qualcomm MSM8255T Snapdragon

CPU	1.4 GHz Scorpion

GPU	Adreno 205

If you think that a computer is the same because it has the same monitor, keyboard, mouse, webcam, case and hdd but one inside is Intel+Nvidia and other AMD+ATI and you call yourself developer thanks a lot I've just got a big smile.

Samsung names their models not by hardware, but by market segment or target.

Being a fruit or a fruit plus if they are Apple and Pears must not be at the same place.

At least the 9001 helps to find it.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] broncogr:
Pretty blunt for just your 5th post.....

Well it was not my decision but a 9001 specific forum will not be offred on XDA.

Also, I dont call myself a developer

But what do you call yourself?

Certainly not one that has contributed anything to this community...

Happy new year

P.S. Dont lose the smile....
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] vdb4:
Somewhat blunt indeed. But on the other hand, I don't think he really meant it as an offense. Rather you're the representative of us and you are in position to make improvements like this happen (or at least propose them). His post did make some sense. We're on a dev forum, and I9000 and I9001 are totally different beasts to develop for.

My newbie 2 cents ;)

Cheers and happy new year!
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] broncogr:
Thats why you have a specific forum just for 9001 development...
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] rokliqad:
isnt it possible to create a seperate "Galaxy S Plus I9001 Q&A" additional?

everthing in one threat and hidden in the "Galaxy S i9000 Q&A" are not very usefull.

no one find and read this and we need a place for noob (like me :o) questions to keep the dev forum clean.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] rayiskon:
or maybe move the general i9001 thread as a sticky in the dev forum, but then penalty everyone who writes general and Q&A stuff in the wrong place .
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] broncogr:
You mean move it BACK to the dev forum.

Well mate that didnt work so well last time it was there, everyone would still post in the dev forum.

I feel the forum is much cleaner this way.

Cheers
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] rayiskon:
nah people are still writing non dev stuff (u can see that from yesterday there are 4-5 non dev threads ;) ) ,but other mods where cleaning in the meanwhile too :)

i only thought that a sticky "general" might be more attractive to some people , than going to I9000 general to look for the I9001 sticky. but it's not an issue, either way works for me :D
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] broncogr:
Please report everypost that is not development then so it can be quickly moved out of here...
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] djdana:
Just want to share that we can vote to make our stand as i9001 users to get out of the i9000 section!!

So vote:p

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1416406
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] kellermanv:
Kinda pointless now...
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] djdana:
No it is pointless not to vote at all.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] kellermanv:
So, we gathered like 100+ votes during such short time. I guess if our device would have been added earlier, we would have won that poll.

Therefore, i beg you, make us a new damn section, i saw a lot of threads which got lost in i9000 general because there are too many i9000 users.

Seriously, it only takes 5 minutes... :mad:

P.S: Also, looks like there are more and more roms and kernels for us...
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] broncogr:
This has been discussed before.

Please read above...
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] kellermanv:
It was discussed BEFORE. Now it's not before, NOW it is NOW, and the community grew up.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] broncogr:
Drop the caps please mate, it is considered shouting.

And no, ther will not be a dediacted forum for this device.

At least you have a dedicated development subforum.

Cheers
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] wintel_mac:
Sad that those votes still are not enough for a dedicated forum :(
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] kellermanv:
It is considered shouting when i write the whole sentence in caps. Otherwise, it's just highlighting a word.

And what is the teason behind your decision ?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] broncogr:
Read the thread...

No it isnt my decision.

But it is final so no point in discussing this further
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Rhonin86:
Concerning the structure...

Hi Bronco,

i wonder why this Thread had been moved.

kernel 4pda.ru

I think it belongs to the develloping section of the I9001 because this kernel was made for this phone. And it is still under devellopment as far as i understand vitaly - So why have you moved it and why was it closed ?

I refer to your post:

i9001 is meant for Roms and kernels

Please give us an explanation so that the next threads will be placed in the right manner...

Cheers

Rhonin
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] chasemyass:
kernel.4pda.ru was made for GT-I9001 or Galaxy S?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Rhonin86:
Hi Chasemyass,

the kernel was made for SGS+ I9001 therefor i can't understand why it was moved. I have installed the kernel so i can proof that it is made for our phone.

Nevertheless maybe Vitaly opens up a new thread. It might be interesting to see more of the russian devellopers.

Cheers

Rhonin
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] chasemyass:
My opinion is like this:

I love to see work fromvother part of the worl regarding phones (specially for sgs+) but if they want to post it here they have some rules they gotta stick too BUT and I type BUT with big letters because of this particular reason of that thread closed and you know why? I think that moderator, as it should be, has to check the thread to see if it's dev related, even if the ppl who start it didn't respect one rule (let's be serious a thread title that doesn't contain some typos) isn't a good ideea to close it but rather correct the title and move it to the right section and if the forum moderator can't prove isn't dev related but other users do, then it should be closed...A bit of more understanding regarding this can be done, at least when we see people coming here from other forums.I can say that there are alot more "bloatware" to clean around than what happened with the russian fella' that all he wanted was to share some work from other part of this planet. ;)

Sorry if my english isn't perfect, I'm doing my best at it :D
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] wintel_mac:
In the opening post, there was no description at all. The thread name was ok I think. But there are rules over here and there was a project to keep the DEV sections clean. And if you break those rules the holy mods come out and move and close your threads. It's as simple as that.

I'm not always happy with this and moving them to the huge 9000 forums is not a solution at all in my opinion.

But the XDAs do not want to have a dedicated 9001 general forum. So we are screwed.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] chasemyass:
Well i`m ok with rules but still they have to be warned or somethin` if they screw it not to delete thread.And you know I am right when I say there is alot of "bloatware" on forum that still needs some housekeepin` ;)

Anyway I think that particular russian should give a chance to make it right before closing the thread, it`s the beauty of variations to have more work on one forum, and you guys know that XDA forum is THE MOST ACTIVE regarding android dev ;) so please don`t "ban" work, ban stupidity instead ;)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] broncogr:
The problem is that the thread was not development.

It was just a link to another forum where the kernel could be downloaded, so it was only that, a link.

For it to be development we need features, changelogs, SOURCES, and SUPPORT!

A mere link is certainly not a dev thread
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Rhonin86:
Ok, i understand and we should try to tell it to Vitaly, the russian DEVELLOPER of this kernel because it seems to be a liguistic problem. Maybe he starts a new try with all this information offered by you. He tried it already but not at the beginning of the thread. Vitalys explanation

THX Bronco

Cheers

Rhonin
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] broncogr:
Are you sure that his english language skills will suffice for him to have a dev thread here?

He even made some posts is Russian....

Plus the thread was not started by him...

So who is the dev finally?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Rhonin86:
Give him a try ?

Hi Bronco,

maybe it is a chance to learn more and to grow with the task ? Look, i have started also a thread in the name of a german developer and try to give the best to support all readers and users of the forum, but at the end i'm still a noob and not a developer. But i learn with each post.... ;)

Thx for your good work

Rhonin :D
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] broncogr:
The thing is that the developer should be the one posting the thread....

Listen this is not a forum to learn english communication skills, this is a dev forum.

As long as the threads concern actual development rather than posting links as well as them containing all the proper info to classify them as dev threads, then we are ok.

If not they will be closed and moved.

Sorry but we need to keep the forum clean and up to the rules
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] alexyuh:
Very badly!!!

In vain you have closed a thread. The developer I or not it is unimportant!!! I have brought valuable and the essential information for I9001!! Which has helped and will help much!!! If at you would be I9001 you so haven't arrived!
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] nikagl:
Relax dude, don't get worked up so much... what thread was closed? The ops do their best to keep the forums clean, please treat them with respect...
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] alexyuh:
!!!

I simply wanted to help and unite efforts for common cause, and have encountered a misunderstanding wall??? Let then will help with transfer at us is other questions and ourselves can help much!!

You by the way the test the last version from

http://www.android-hilfe.de/root-ha...xy-s-plus/203994-lauter-kern-mit-4pda-ru.html
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] nikagl:
I have seen your threads. Biggest issue here is the language problem we encounter. Although the information provided (Vitaly's kernel and new version of Adrenaline), the only thing you do is point to another website and do not provide credits, details of what is exactly in the development, etc., etc. Without proper formatting of the Original Post (OP) and inclusion of credits, version numbering, etc., there's no use to keep those threads as they only refer to threads that cannot be read by 90% of the community...

So... the info provided is appreciated, but if you really want to contribute, please add the original information correctly (version numbers, what it exactly does, actual binaries, etc.) and be the communicator between Vitaly and us.

Regards,

Nika.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] broncogr:
The reasons for closing the thread have been clearly provided. It was not a dev thread it was just a link. I suggest you watch your attitude. And yes, the developer is the one who should be posting the thread as it is done in 99% of all dev threads. Where is the VALUABLE AND ESSENTIAL info you have provided? I only saw a link...

That my friend is not a dev thread

Exactly my point
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] BriKeD:
A good thing:)

click THANKS if I was helpful for you!!!!!☺
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] BulletproofIdeal:
I have a personal line that I want to give to customers but I don't want to waste my family plan's minutes talking to them. Is there anyway I can send numbers that are not in my contacts straight to my voicemail? This way I can offer up my number (which is better than giving my store's) and at the same time keep my usage down. Oh and Google Voice is not an option since it isn't available here in Canada.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] rmw1980:
I rooted my sgs2 I777 with CWM a few months ago. Now my phone is trying to run updates, but the updates keep getting interrupted. I'm assuming it's because th device is rooted. Is a newer version of cwm available, and should it fix my issues?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] creepyncrawly:
Several users have updated successfully with root, and the root stick with the update. However, it appears that a custom kernel will cause the update to fail. You could try flashing the stock kernel, and then doing the update. And once you update successfully and retain root, you can put a CWM kernel back on the phone. Get the stock kernel Odin flashable tar here.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] rmw1980:
Thanks dude, I appreciate your help =)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] rmw1980:
I reflashed cwm to my device after updates were complete. Just noticed my wifi isn't working. I flashed the device with cwm 5.0.2.3. Should I have used a newer version of cwm, or is something else causing the wifi to malfunction?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] jack man:
I hear clearing cache/dalvic cache has corrected the wifi problem for some people in the same situation.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] rmw1980:
how do you clear the cache? Sorry, I'm kinda a noob.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] jack man:
It's one of the options in CWM recovery. From main menu choose Advanced, then clear dalvic cache. It will probably take longer than normal to reboot. Since this didn't happen with mine, I'm not sure if this will fix the wifi, but heard it might. It surely wont hurt your phone, dont worry.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] rmw1980:
Thanks, trying it now, I'll let you know if it works.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] rmw1980:
Clearing cache didn't work. Will attempt to flash daily driver mod, by Entropy, next. Th mod has been said to fix the problem.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] jack man:
you might also want to try the wipe data/factory reset from CWM. I would back up anything you don't want to lose, but the more I think about it, this may be the fix I read in a different thread. I'm not sure how much it would wipe though.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Cozmo1:
Your WIFI issue will be resolved flashing Entropy's DD from 1221. Clearing your cache and/or davlik will not do anything to resolve it.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] rmw1980:
Thanks, do you know where I can find it in a tar package? I prefer flashing with Odin.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Cozmo1:
I have not seen a tar package for it. I could probably put it in a tar, but I prefer loading it with its CWM package or loading it the way I have outlined here. Honestly, the CWM package is your best and safest choice, imo.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] rmw1980:
Thanks for the information. Will try it tomorrow.
[Streak 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] waune:
Well i have a AWS Streak From Cincinnati Bell Carrier locked, i bought the phone from a guy that said he put the Power_Rom on its the 1.2 Build

Its

2.3.4

GAUSB1A134934-EU It should say aws at the end

2.6.35.7-perf

ASK's Power_Rom

1.2

Is their anyway i can change the baseband back to an aws version so i can get 3G or is their no way to do that i did some searching and could find any certain aws baseband versions. And this phone is an aws version phone i had check and verified with cincinnati bell.
[Streak 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TheManii:
Is it unlocked now? that's the only thing that really matters.
[Streak 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] waune:
Its not unlocked i check when i got home i put in a tmobile sim att sim and and a international version sim and they all say carrier locked and ask to put in a code but it works fine on the cincinnati bell sim but only gets edge

I also checked the apn settings and everything is correct
[Streak 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TheManii:
Well unless you happen to have a cincinatti bell in your area then, it wouldnt matter as it's still sim locked
[Streak 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] waune:
I dont think you get what im trying to do

I live in cincinnati and have a cincinnati bell unlimited plan 4G/3G

Im just trying to know if i can restore the baseband back to normal to get the 3G back

and if so what baseband could i use? Right now the phone is acting like its an EU

European model on my Streak box it has UMTS900, UMTS1700, UMTS2100 And its the

M01M002 so its AWS

Is their a way for me to do this are am i screwed
[Streak 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TheManii:
Oh, I guess I misred it then, as I figured you lived in europe from the title.

You cant change the sub-model, it's physically impossible. BUT 349 is the cincinatti bell rom.

If it were a different rom i'd suggest reinstalling 349, but that isnt an option as that rom has never been dumped (i have no information at all on it except the version number)

When in doubt, install 360 and work your way form there, the files and instructions are on the xda wiki.

If your device is truely GAUSB1A134934-EU then something went terribly wrong somewhere.
[Streak 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] waune:
I did as suggested and everything went smooth but it still says eu

Is their anyone with an aws update pkg?

And is their a such thing as an aws amss.mbn?

Any help would be great, but I might just sell it and get another streak after tonight.
[Streak 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TheManii:
Basebands dont care about whichever submodel you have.

I cant say what you should do, if you were the original owner i'd say take it to CBell and ask them, but who knows if they'll support a 2ndhand owner.
[Defy General] qsmyle:
Dear Defy owners,

As you may know we have PowerVR gpu wich is strong but there is a lot of beautiful game wich doesn't support our video chip.

I look for the proper solution to run Tegra games on Defy. Especially the Fishlab's Galaxy On Fire 2.

There is the ChainFire3D stuff, wich is able to emulate Nvidia's Tegra video capabilities. In theory. But I haven't get any happy result with it.

But there is a thread about ChainFire3D and Tegra: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1137034

Is it possible, that we need special Tegra plugin for ChainFire3D wich is compatible to our Defy?

What is your experience about ChainFire3D, guys?
[Defy General] nameite:
Well isnt the Tegra 2 a lot more powerful than our SGX530?

So some games would be very bad, especially after emulation.

Did you try activating 16-bit texture etc? That should help a lot.

Just curious, which games are you playing where you having problems?