yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Fascinate General] skynet11:
I don't what to say this. What you guy though?

Terminators run on Android :cool:
[Fascinate General] droidstyle:
TimmyK @ rootz

"I came from GB and I flashed the cwm for cyanogenmod/mtd and flashed build 4 and running smooth.

I bet if you d/l 4 flash cache/dalvik/and do factory reset, it'll flash fine!

To go back the instructions are in the OP. to go back you have to do it twice it states.

Haven't contributed too much thus far, hopefully this helps you.

***will pics fun mtd kernels? May be a really dumb question, I'm just curious."
[Fascinate General] laureanop:
Ummm...can you repeat that a few times?

"the relentless pursuit of the perfect ROM "
[Fascinate General] skynet11:
From Rootzwiki:

Nothing you can't learn from a few of those free Home Depot classes - you'll be able to build your own room in no time ;)

(ZOMG another Uberdev in the making O_o)

Terminators run on Android :cool:
[Fascinate General] skynet11:
Terminators run on Android :cool:
[Fascinate General] hesh.monster:
Honey is delicious...therefore adrynalyne must be delicious, brb.....

"the grave will provide plenty of time for silence"
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] anotherxdauser:
Hi

Is there a limit on how many items can be in a folder?

If so, is there a way to change this?

I want to put all my games in a folder, but there appears to be a limit.

Thanks
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Ves:
I think you just answered your own question.

How many games were able to put in one folder?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] anotherxdauser:
16.

How rubbish :/

I do hope they change this.
[Verizon Droid Incredible 2] bsannes:
Ok I am currently running Cm7 on my Dinc2 and I recently have aquired a x2 and wanted to try it out. My question is after I activate the x2 and am ready to switch back to my dinc2 will there be any activation problems?
[Verizon Droid Incredible 2] cac2us:
If there is any problems with re activation of DIncII you might want to have a sense based rom on hand to access the ##778# send for the EPST settings.

CM7 seems to not be able to incorporate that "feature" into it's kitchen.

I went from a XV6900 to the DIncII for the upgrade and had to switch back to the 6900 so I wouldn't need 2 data plans.

Then had to put the Red DIncII on the primary line that has the data plan and had the Dark DIncII.

Tech support couldn't get it so I did it through the site with an old dumbphone to keep the service live.

Called Tech back right away to confirm my grandfathered data plan was still good.

Hope that helps...
[Xoom General] Godspeed123:
hi guys

just wanted to welcome myself for i am new to this forum

some of my friends use this as well

i recently just got my xoom

hoping to get it "ROOTED"
[Xoom General] wsigep1901:
Welcome! Start reading up and you will be rooted in no time
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] SquareBare:
Hey, I am seriously considering pulling the trigger on a nexus upgrade but there is one thing I really have to know...

Do the Voice Actions work in loud and noisy environments? Crowded bars? Car doing 60 with the windows down? Near a highway or busy intersection?

My current phone has great noise cancellation for CALLS but the voice actions are near impossible unless I am alone in a quiet room.

*PS, I am using an Xperia play with 2.3, I wonder of other 2.3 devices have this problem or if it is specific to my poorly designed phone.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] SquareBare:
I guess I may have to answer my own question tomorrow....
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] hinghing1113:
I downloaded .9b on below 2 sites, but they don't have the same crc32

one show ADD43A4A, other show 7CF6C6B9,

so which one i should use?

http://rootzwiki.com/topic/4550-app09-beta-snapdragon-dual-core-oc-control/page__hl__fauxclock

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1348007
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] x1tyme:
it the same app, just different site. You can install either
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] hinghing1113:
I knew they are the same app, but different CRC32 or MD5
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] mongo41:
either one is ok to install. trust me youll be fine.
[Galaxy S II General] danielsf:
I was just looking at Engadget, and I saw this: http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/17/bell-mobility-hints-at-ice-cream-sandwich-release-dates-for-gala/

Here is what the article it says:

"We've come across an internal document from Bell Mobility that's bound to raise the hopes of a few good Canadians. Yes folks, we're talking Ice Cream Sandwich. The carrier to the north estimates that it'll have Android 4.0 ready for the Sensation in February, which is to be followed by the Raider's update in March -- this handset may be more familiar to AT&T customers as the Vivid. Pulling up the rear, users of the Galaxy S II are to expect the upgrade in April, and while the Optimus LTE is also mentioned, there's no specific time frame for that one. Certainly estimated release dates don't always come to fruition, but at least we know what Bell's aiming for, anyway."

I really hope this estimate is wrong, what do you think?
[Galaxy S II General] Annihlist:
Kp1. Maybe P = April :)
[Galaxy S II General] xethor:
I think that is the date the Galaxy SII will get ICS on that carrier. Remember that a lot of carriers delay updates to their phones so they can be "certified". Also, if we already have a pretty much working build of ICS (give or take a few force closes and battery life), how can it take them so long to polish it?
[Galaxy S II General] jonny68:
At this stage i have to say im a bit pissed off that we still haven't been given ICS for our SGSII why cant they just release all the necessary code required so developers can do their thing.:confused:
[Galaxy S II General] mudferret:
Bell is very, very slow at releasing official firmware updates. As far as I know the SGSII still comes with their carrier branded 2.3.3

If they're releasing in April and that happens to be at the same time as ICS goes global, I'd be very, very, VERY surprised. Just a possibility.
[Galaxy S II General] luke05dee:
I will be issed also if it isn't released by February by the latest, if it isn't i think ill be getting a nexus phone next year.
[Galaxy S II General] danielsf:
I think I am going to get the next nexus phone regardless of when we get ICS for the GS2. :)
[Galaxy S II General] buxz777:
to be honest i hope they dont rush it , it isnt just building ics for their hardware it needs intensive testing as well

the sgs2 has shipped over 10 million units now , releasing a firmware with bugs in it could do more harm then good and id rather wait and get a rock solid ics for our phones and for the devs to have a solid base to tweak from

lets face it they got the firmware the phone shipped with pretty dam good and i hope too see a nice stable ics release from them too

i use my phone to much to be using beta software and ive had enough nokias in my time and had enough of unstable buggy firmware and waiting for patches to come to fix the bugs

i think april sounds about right for a genuine samsung firmware that has been fully tested for stabillity and compatabillity with apps and extras
[Galaxy S II General] armanderli:
Does not sound like an xda developer member...just sayin'

Envoyé depuis mon GT-I9100 utilisant Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II General] Intratech:
Here we go again! :o:o:o
[Galaxy S II General] mudferret:
They do it because they're mean. But I guess they don't like law suits either. Mean.

Sent from my MicroTAC 9800X using speech to fax modem
[Galaxy S II General] interfreak:
This really means nothing for international GS2's. More than likely Samsung's ICS will release in late December/early January and those on XDA will have it looong before Bell in Canada.
[Galaxy S II General] SiSL:
Bell is an North America carrier which does not have any Apple vs. Samsung court cases.

Yet, rest of the world do. That's why I can certainly say that Ice Cream Sandwich for SGS II & Galaxy Tabs will be the fastest delivery of an Android distribution (from Google release to End users) Samsung ever made.
[Galaxy S II General] xmfpdlemalnz@hotmail.com:
That date is for carrier branded phones.

For international phones it would be much sooner.

I'm expecting mid Jan
[Galaxy S II General] jangomango:
Dude... Have you ever tried to polish ice cream? Took me ages and it still wasnt that shiney...

Sent from my grammaphone
[Galaxy S II General] vicelord.leo:
Well let see when is ICS released Foote galaxy S2. There is no even ant sign of CM9. Earlier there was issue of mic not working during call. Now after release of the leak version, lots of stuff are working but unstable, but now no any news of CM9 for galaxy S2. It seems we have to depend on Samsung rather then cm9 team for ICS. Developers pls don't be hurt. Almost all devices are getting ICS except S2. It really feels bad that we are deprived of the same. Thanks
[Galaxy S II General] marcelotorres:
Hope you guys that live in Europe get the update Asap. Here in Latin America (Brazil), we will receive the update maybe on Q3 2012. But, i really hope that all of us can get CM9 before April.
[Galaxy S II General] 02ranger:
Its actually samsung's fault they haven't got it working yet. Samsung hasn't released kernel sources yet. I think the main obstacle right now for cm9 is the RIL is unstable. Codeworkx said once they can stabilize that they'd probably have a beta soon after. Kernel sources would give the cm9 team what they need to get RIL stable. So when we get that or a leak with stable RIL we should get cm9. I totally believe the cm team will get to the finish line long before Samsung. The other devices already getting alphas and betas of cm9 must just be easier to get working. I've read the galaxy sII is "unique" to code for because of the hardware.
[Galaxy S II General] HellcatDroid:
There's still a lot of work to be done by Sammy.

They can't release something they don't have - makes sense, doesn't it?

As for the second part of your statement: They did. KP1, nuff said.
[Galaxy S II General] ithehappy:
Definitely for that carrier.

KP1 is already released and all the major functions work. So another month max it will take to release the stable version.

And I didn't pay 600 US$ to Devs, but Samsung, so it's their responsibility to release it at time, hence I don't give a damn what Devs are doing.

Still I think Samsung should take a little bit of extra time, if it's needed, it's far better to release a Stable version than releasing a non stable one in a hurry. Also Google said that they would like the manufacturers to use 4.0.3 as the base version, so I don't know if Samsung will give us 4.0.1 like KP1 or directly 4.0.3.

Source:

http://www.gsmarena.com/gsm_galaxy_nexus_gets_402_update_403_announced_already-news-3533.php
[Galaxy S II General] Tombias:
You're reacting as a little kid that isn't getting his candy quicky.

It's a privilege that we actually are getting ics. Is my opinion.
[Galaxy S II General] Neo.:
This.

Agree with every bit of it
[Galaxy S II General] jangomango:
It makes me laugh that some folks seem to assume they have paid for a phone and regular updates... A long time ago when phones were just phones.. The firmware you got was the firmware you got....

Sent from my thoroughly modern telephone...
[Galaxy S II General] JonesWTF:
Exactly what I've been saying. A lot of users, recently, seem to think that these updates are their god given right because they have paid money for the hardware. That is all they've paid for, the hardware. People can't just wait a little for something to be released.

It's like day one of the ICS source being released, next day "where's my ICS Samsung!?!?!?!?".

Sent from my SGS II via Tapatapatapatalk
[Galaxy S II General] tommo123:
and that's relevant how? we didn't care then. updates didn't do anything

a long time ago we didn't have smart phones.
[Galaxy S II General] danmullen:
+1 / Like / RT
[Galaxy S II General] jowett69:
would you be happy if your computer or xbox,ps3 did not have updates for bugs and security and paid lot of money for them!
[Galaxy S II General] ithehappy:
▲▲Sorry forgot that idiots will also view this thread! Why should I bash Samsung when idiots are here in our very XDA? Sigh..

Besides you load of kids will cry the most when ICS will delay a day after another, or you guys are so blunt that you don't use the phone but only for show off or excessive money needed to be burned somewhere?

• http://www.theverge.com/2011/05/10/google-promises-android-devices-updates-18-months/

• http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/10/google-clarifies-18-month-android-upgrade-program-details-far-f/

▼▼Don't waste your time guys, I am wasting mine, so save yours ;)
[Galaxy S II General] Intratech:
Even though this is XDA-"Developers" it appears that 97% of the members on here don't have a clue about software development or the factors involved. I know XDA tried operation Iron Fist but that was a miserable failure... even more than George Bush.
[Galaxy S II General] ithehappy:
Isn't that OFF TOPIC Intra?

Besides 'Developer' shouldn't be an equivalent word to ignore the hard fact, right?

Swyping from my I9100 via Tt
[Galaxy S II General] $omator:
that is info for canadian (amaricas) version of sgs2 yup?

i think samsung always pushed americas firmware updates with 1-2-3 months delay so europe will get it around jan/feb and then it will follow
[Galaxy S II General] Jeegsawk:
don't think so. I am absolutely convinced Samsung will do as ever. We will get official ics on our SGS2 only after the release of sgs3. So don't hold your breath. The wait is long

Inviato dal mio GT-I9100 usando Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II General] airwater9:
That would be a PR disaster for Samsung...there will be competition between manufacturers which users will judge which of them can delivery firmware updates in a timely manner.
[Galaxy S II General] valentinrascu:
For usa !not for europe!!;)

Inviato dal mio GT-I9100 usando Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II General] jonny68:
No im not actually and it is not a privilege at all it's a right, if you've spent €500 on a product you don't just expect the company who's product it is to just do nothing you expect upgrades when they are available, like if you buy a laptop and Windows suddenly didn't bother with updates would you find that acceptable.

Think about it mate
[Galaxy S II General] soulicro:
Really? So when you bought a computer with Windows XP, and then Windows Vista came around, the company you bought your computer from just sent you a free Windows Vista install disk with a cd-key and everything?

That sounds great, where did you buy your computer from? I'd like to shop there as well.
[Galaxy S II General] jonny68:
look at my above post mate, i am not usually one for comments like this but if you have spent a good bit of money on a product like many on here have who purchased the SGSII outright have done you should be entitled to major upgrades and not have to wait while other handsets get them beforehand, this is Samsungs flagship andset and has sold millions of units therefore they really should IMO be pushing a lot harder to get an ICS upgrade quicker.

No need for :o i aint no noob!!
[Galaxy S II General] soulicro:
Sure, I'll reply to this post of yours too. What other major companies have released stable ICS builds for their devices?

Also, I hope you didn't miss my other reply to one of your posts
[Galaxy S II General] jonny68:
The difference is you have to pay a lot of money to upgrade in Windows as they try and milk as much out of you as they possibly can, with Android any upgrade is free and so it bloody should be as well

---------- Post added at 04:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:48 PM ----------

your a bit of a smart ass aren't you, so far as far as im aware only the Galaxy Nexus with more to come, besides the point anyway:rolleyes:
[Galaxy S II General] soulicro:
Right.

When you bought your SGII, where did it say "free upgrades for life!"? When did Samsung commit to you that they would upgrade your phone the second a new version of Android came about?

No other company has released a stable build of ICS yet, and everyone is all pissy as if the whole world has been getting stable builds of ICS and Samsung is the only company not to release anything.

You'll get your ICS build, I can assure you. But it won't be within one month of a major edition of Android that overhauls a lot of internals. I mean, what, you think it's as easy as double-clicking an .exe file and waiting for it to finish installing?

---------- Post added at 05:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:55 PM ----------

Please keep your insults to yourself.

First of all - whoops, the GNexus is a Samsung phone. So, it seems that so far they are the only one that released a phone with ICS. How about that.

Second of all - it isn't besides the point, you said yourself:

You're not waiting while other handsets are getting them beforehand. NO ONE OTHER HANDSET HAS GOTTEN ANYTHING BEFORE YOU, because no other handset has gotten a stable build of ICS. As far as I know, the only other company that released ANYTHING was Sony Ericsson, and their release is a half-working alpha build which is arguably worse than the leak we have (except, their leaks can't even make phone calls).
[Galaxy S II General] mr mystery:
If it drops in April I'm done with anything not Nexus! And that sucks having to keep one device for a year and no hardware choice. Google needs to fix the fragmentation issues it really is silly now.
[Galaxy S II General] jonny68:
Again i repeat when you have spent a large chunk of money on a smartphone you should expect upgrades, i wouldn't care too much if i spent €50 on a basic phone that just makes calls and does the basics, when you have a product like the SGSII which has broken records and become Samsungs biggest selling item ever you EXPECT upgrades when they are released and you expect Samsung to push as hard as possible to get this upgrade as soon as possible to keep their customers appeased, for me that is the right thing to do if you don't think so then no problem.
[Galaxy S II General] Martin5000:
I'm afraid you're right...

To my knowledge KI was released in september, KJ in october, KK in november and following that, KL will be december, KM january, KN february, KO march... which fits with KP in april... and the announcement earlier from Samsung Italy stating a Q2 release :-(

I'm crossing my fingers that the good devs from CyanogenMod, MIUI etc can brew something useful faster than Samsung *sigh*
[Galaxy S II General] soulicro:
It's been a month since ICS sources were released and we've already got a leak, so obviously they are working on it. You will receive an upgrade.

Then where do KM, KN, and KO fit in? You think Samsung will waste their money in pushing upgrades to Gingerbread? I find it a little doubtful.

Also, there are always leaks, and Codeworkx himself said all they're waiting for is a better leak than the one we've got. I'm sure it will come around.
[Galaxy S II General] doctor1991:
How could be the final build named as the alfa build? If now we have the various kp1, kp2 it's nearly impossible that the final build will have that codenames.
[Galaxy S II General] cipry189:
actually no, from what I know form my old omnia there is a leter for the year so the k must have been for the year 2011, and L will be for 2012, the letter for the month will reset to a, or what ever the start form on January
[Galaxy S II General] Intratech:
Samsung have been releasing performance, bugfix and security updates for Gingerbread just like M$ and Apple does via new firmwares. I don't think M$ or Apple sent you a free upgrade disc when they released a new OS which is essentially what you are suggesting here. This is the flaw in your argument.
[Galaxy S II General] buxz777:
i still cant believe people expect a fully working , fully stable , samsung firmware to be ready in a few weeks

the source code was only sent to them a few weeks back

do people not understand that samsung have to get this firmware bang on , there is a lot of coding to be done , coding can be extremley complex , change a bit of code it cold break other coding , its a very tricky job , this is why we should have so much respect for the devs that sit infront of their computer and make roms for us

at the end of the day samsung cant afford to release a half buggy ics just so users can say ''yeah ive got ics on my sgs2''

with over 10million units sold if the update introduces bugs it could mess up what people think of samsung , what people think of the sgs2 , put people off buying samsung phones etc etc to rush ics is more hassle then its worth

peeps just need to chill out and learn to be patient , yeah we may get some versions from devs that arent fully stable etc but samsung cant afford to do the same

as others have said we already have a leaked version with touchwiz so its not like samsung are just sitting on their hands thinking about what they want for dinner :-)

patience is a vertue and ics sandwich will come so just wait a bit and enjoy what we have , ics doesnt suddenly turn our phones into some sort of life changing , cancer curing , space exploring time machine

peace

edit

id love to see the people maoning about ics not being out already get the source code and actually try and build it for us :-) ha ha ha :-) then they might actually understand why it takes time and things have to be tested as well as just built :-)

when ics is ready it wont be released straight away they will test it intensivley so they know that it is stable and ready to be uploaded to kies for users to flash :-)

edit2

ut oh imagine what people will say when they find out that the nexus s is now getting the latest ics build sent via ota :-)

http://www.gsmarena.com/google_begins_rolling_out_ics_update_to_the_gsm_nexus_s-news-3534.php
[Galaxy S II General] jonny68:
Of course they didn't because it has never been something they have done especially Microsoft who charge obscene prices for software is it any wonder so many people download pirated copies of Windows i done it myself before i got a new laptop with Windows 7 pre loaded, what i am suggesting is that Samsung are more transparent, it just appears that there are too many rumours and too much hearsay with regard to ICS and nothing definitive, ive every respect for any dev working on a ICS project but i just think Samsung can be doing a whole lot more than what they actually are.
[Galaxy S II General] :
Dear Samsung,

If you happen to read this, we're not ALL ****s.

Thanks,

Biff.
[Galaxy S II General] jonny68:
Thank you for your thought provoking post, bravo old chap.

if your gonna call me a **** you can at least say it to me directly:rolleyes:
[Galaxy S II General] PlanDreaM:
I have patience, maybe kp3 is better.
[Galaxy S II General] :
Umm...okay? Don't recall reading any of your posts, you're free to presume at will.
[Galaxy S II General] jonny68:
What else would one assume when the next post after mine says "we're not all ****s" if you didn't call me a **** then accept my apologies but it sure looks as if you did.

over and out.
[Galaxy S II General] :
I would've quoted you, or at least replied to your post. A direct reply would be visible in Hybrid view rather than the forum default.
[Galaxy S II General] Intratech:
You serious? Transparent with what? They haven't commented or said anything probably because they want to release a proper firmware instead of committing to a date and having to release a half arsed firmware. The mad rumours on the net are not their doing, it's people like you who are responsible for that and the loads of mis-information that is floating around.

What more can Samsung LEGALLY do? Please tell us as inquiring minds want to know.
[Galaxy S II General] Anibaaal:
K

D

=

April

. 2011

KE = May. 2011

KF = June. 2011

KG = July. 2011

KH = August. 2011

KI = September. 2011

KJ = October. 2011

KK = November. 2011

KL = December. 2011

KM= January. 2012

KN = February. 2012

KO = March. 2012

KP = April. 2012

K = 2011 --- L = 2012 --- A-L = Months

LA = January. 2012

LB = February. 2012

LC = March. 2012

LD = April. 2012