yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] mitoVonDido:
whoaaa..my fav theme is back since KPE!

thanks kkraazzyy n pele78

you're superb themers ;)

Edit: tested n no problemos at all but it just not as the screenshots, not bad for v1 though
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] kkrraazzyy:
Hey to all i have ported this theme but ihave not tested this theme and please dont blame me if there are some bugs in this theme
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] ronhoover88:
Good job doc!!
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] kkrraazzyy:
Thanks ron
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] poolakkal Suresh:
looking great buddy:)
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] nikhilgavit:
looking nice.. professional one..
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] shreyas666:
nice one krazzy....just what i wanted...thanx a million dude..
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] kancilpintar:
This is one helluva of theme. Really sleek and nice, thanks krazy for porting it, still have no problem whatsoever till now, will report if anything happens ;)
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] jesrani:
On flashing your theme I lost network signal. I had deleted the apps "CarHomeGoogle", "Launcher2", "MiUiMusic" from the zip before flashing. Went back to blue obsession and got back the signal!
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] _-xXBilanoidXx-_:
awsome dude. Download now. thx button hehe...

XXKPQ_I9003_C-ROM
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] mr_alone_hvtt:
Tks for theme, down and try it :D
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] shreyas666:
cannot install...installation aborted...bitter dissapointment
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] mr_alone_hvtt:
Bug:

Network

Camera

Phone
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] kkrraazzyy:
@ shreyas

you can manually change the files using root explorer
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] superteekz:
il test it now and get back to you
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] superteekz:
if you delete 'carhomegoogle' the signal goes, and you have no phone app >< beautiful theme tho! good job :P

(EDIT) - actually after one reboot, dailer storage, dailer tab activity, signal, it all dissapears. hmm weird :s
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] shreyas666:
how to...manually change..?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] _-xXBilanoidXx-_:
waiting the fix for that pb phone no signal

XXKPQ_I9003_C-ROM
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] -Cronos-:
can you post some screenshot of how it actually looks?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] manu1991:
^^ Here you go:

The launcher is ADW and the theme is BBT black. everything is working for me.

thanks krazy!. if possible. can you change the colours of the popups in the next version so that they are easier to read? that'd make this perfect :D

this is what I am talking about:
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vandrix:
@krazy

What happend with your phone? Did i missed something.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] kkrraazzyy:
hmm the lcd of my phone is broken
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] desmail:
Sorry, but the phone signal has been fixed?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vishal24387:
so sad buddy...!!! Is it under warranty buddy??
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] kkrraazzyy:
yeah it is underwarranty but may be they will ask for some money for repairing it
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] dhruvwali:
Hey Thanks a ton kkrazzy! Awesome looks ..

but the link is not working anymore...

"This file is either removed due to copyright claim or is deleted by the uploader."

Please help...
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] kkrraazzyy:
sorry bro 2 months before my harddisk was crashed and i have lost all my themes and other data so cant upload this theme
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] xavisaldana:
Oh krazzy I'm sorry u r one of best themers and dev's for 9003, maybe some user can have the zip file downloaded, to upload.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] dhruvwali:
Really sorry to hear that mate.. know that feel bro.. :(

I hope someone else can upload this theme?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] TheFrankenstain:
Hey, i can send you this theme but you need tell me which files belong to it :)
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] shriom_manerker:
this is ur best theme ever kkrraazzyy ! if someone can uplaod it ! please do so !
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] bracula:
yes, I second that. I want it, too.

if anybody still has the file, please share it with us :D
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] 2009sebastian:
any news about the files? this theme seems to be great.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] cukierkas:
Hello. Do we have a live link?

If no, can we have the updates?

This theme is lovely, I always adored b/w simple themes:thumbup:
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] saywhatt:
bump

*i wanna see the link :p
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] pradeepbaskar:
Looks coool

Wish i cud use this theme.. :) love black :good: Can i use this with the rom indroid remics v5...
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] kkrraazzyy:
no it was for stock rom not for aokp
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] cukierkas:
any link updates?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] in0ah:
are these applicable to all firmwares?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] imjustafq:
wow...didnt notice this before..should support other gb rom..esspecially lf2..The dev still around??
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] prabuflash:
good theme
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 General] tixop:
When the new Tabs were announced, all the technical blogs were quick to

mention [I guess copying from some press release]: "full support for Exchange

ActiveSync (v14), on-device encryption, Cisco VPN, Sybase MDM and WebEx

support."

Got [not only because of this, but it was one of the reasons] an EU Tab 8.9

with 3G few weeks ago, with almost none [OK, device encryption is included]

of the above applications included.

Searching the net for the last few weeks on any info and couldn't find any

clear confirmation if ANY Tab 8.9 [US only?] was actually shipped with those.

Can someone confirm they have them on the device? Prepared to flash a

different region firmware if I get a confirmation it contains the apps.

Thanks,

Tix
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 General] Hurrian:
They support installation of said apps, it's not rolled in with the firmware ;)
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 General] tixop:
Whoooops... Mea culpa then... Need to pay more attention to the fine print :-)

Thanks, Hurrian!
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 General] netxph:
For the activesync, have u tried the email app... It works fine for me.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 General] tixop:
Yes, I'm using the email app without problems, but if I'm not mistaken that's Google's code

[they're licensing ActiveSync if my memory still serves me well]. I was hoping that by "FULL

ActiveSync support" they mean Tasks and Notes - which Android still doesn't support natively.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 General] tixop:
Thanks lufc, two minor comments there:

1) I originally thought the enterprise apps are a part of some ROM - already

apologized for that in the post #3

2) I'm a regular [read-only] on XDA for about six years now, have learned the rules

by now - just when I started the thread there was no "General" for 8.9, only

"Development" under the "new Tabs" forum.

Thanks for giving 8.9 a proper home BTW :-)
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 General] nkrick:
Take a look at Nitrodesk Touchdown application for better ActiveSync support. It has been a long time since I used it, but I think it does much more than the native app.

WebEx is an available app in the market. For Cisco VPN, there may be an app, or you may need to get it from your company IT. My company uses an F5 VPN and there are several market apps for it from F5.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 General] snudel:
i am using cisco webex on my US 8.9 and it is working fine.

no issues so far
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 General] nycbjr:
There is something called AnyConnect and it is part of a new firmware update for newer cisco vpn devices. If you look in the market for AnyConnect there is a app from Cisco for rooted and non rooted, as well as a samsung specific build, to use the samsung build you must have a stock rom (this is why cisco has a rooted version, which makes me laugh!).

Then there is a matter of talking to your network guys. We just put new vpn appliances in here at the Library, but it didn't have anyconnect, we are looking at the upgrade for that now, I am excited, I might be able to get away from carrying my laptop everywhere!
[Galaxy S II General] spoiltz:
I bought my Galaxy SII, a few days back. At that time i had option to choose between I9100 and I9100G, as the vendor had both. So, i preferred I9100 over I9100G.

Many of you, may have got I9100G, recently, as it is the new stock available. Samsung is trying to replace the original SII, i.e. I9100 with I9100G, in the markets of INDIA, MALAYSIA & SINGAPORE.

This is to fulfill the demands of GALAXY SII, which has increased vastly. So, to fulfill the demand, before it dies out, SAMSUNG has quietly slipped I9100G version, which has PowerVR TI OMAP 4430 processor, and not the Exynos 4210.

So, what i have researched and found out is that, it is better, if you can get an I9100, before it extincts, instead of getting stuck with "G".

By no means, i am saying that, I9100G, is bad, what i am trying to say here is that, its not as good as I9100's Exynos.

Some major differences which i found out are:-

1. Galaxy SII I9100 will be the first in the GALAXY family, to get an ICS update.

2. Exynos processors still have huge RAW power.

3. The isuue is GPU used in I9100G has PowerVR540 TI OMAP 4430, at 300 MHz,which is single core and weak, compared to MALI400MP+, which is quadcore inside Exynos.

******I am talking about GPU, and not single or dual core CPU******

4. Regarding future updates, I9100G users may be isolated, as I9100G is not replacing original I9100 in EU, and so many other countries.

5. Also, the development support for I9100, is much much much greater than I9100G. As majority of the community still uses I9100.

6. The overheating problem is very less in I9100G, as compared to I9100.

7. Battery, too performs well in I9100G.

8. But, both overheating, and battery improvement, doesn't comes without cost. I9100G doesn't gets overheated, because its cpu is clocked max at 1.008 Ghz, unlike 1.2Ghz in I9100. Same, helps with improved battery.

Well, these were the major issues which i pointed out.

Also, here i am just trying to convey knowledge, which i gained to others.I have not posted this to decide whats superior, its just a comaprison.

Any Opinions, or views is warmly welcomed.
[Galaxy S II General] ambar_hitman:
Nice post. I suggest you head to Indian Galaxy SII owner thread for more details.

The Indian I9100G got an official 2.3.6 update via Samsung KIES and I9100 DIDNT get any update. Its still stuck on 2.3.3 in India, where as most of the world got 2.3.6 1-2 weeks back. So in short, Samsung has stopped supporting FW update for I9100 via KIES and OTA.

Check the thread for more details. Members are posting Samsung India on Facebook, Twitter, their customer support chat etc etc. Only way to upgrade Indian I9100 is to flash European Firmware.
[Galaxy S II General] netchip:
I9100G is better for porting cyanogenmod etc.

TI is a very good Soc vendor

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II General] ambar_hitman:
^Yeah, that is a plus point of I9100G. The TI OMAP processor is very dev friendly, thanks to its source being released and its presence in many phones like Optimus 2X, Galaxy Nexus, Nexus S, Moto Razr etc. This is one of the reasons why 2.3.6 update of I9100G was released earlier than I9100 in India. I bet ICS porting will also be easy as Galaxy Nexus is also using Ti OMAP (4460 instead of 4430) but same Power VR GPU.

Expect ports of all major ROMS soon. CM9 and MIUI ports are already confirmed.

Also, the I9100G sound quality is better than I9100, thanks to OMAP processor. We all know about the audio quality of S2 from the Anandtech article, which criticizes the Ymaha DAC used on I9100.
[Galaxy S II General] MrPhilo:
The Mali GPU isn't quad core, doesn't mean it says 4 cores its quad, e.g my amd gpu has 600 cores, so whats that?

The Mali GPU is a single core in the SGS2, it is better than the SGX543 which Apple A5 chip uses but has 2 SGX543 which is why it outperforms all GPU even Tegra 3 which atm is the best single GPU.
[Galaxy S II General] spoiltz:
The official support for indian i9100, is not closed.

Still, the phone will get ICS, confirmed it via Samsung India.
[Galaxy S II General] spoiltz:
Both the phones got pro's as well as con's.

I9100 still got better development support, as it is available in majority of countries. Whereas, I9100G will only be pushed to India, Vietnam, Malaysia & Singapore Markets.

Updates which are being developed, will be first pushed to I9100, as its community is vast.

It doesn't matters, if an update is being pushed to India or not.Actually, this is the point of us being here, that if we don't get something, and are not satisfied, we can look at development at xda. A EU firmware, or any other firmware, doesn't really matters.

Same thing applies, with I9100G, it really doesn't matters, what you have got with it, there is always development, as long as devs support it.

For now, I9100 got better support, as it was here from a long time. Now, that I9100G is here, it too will get supported.

Rest TI OMAP4430 PoverVR540, too is on par with Exynos 4210.
[Galaxy S II General] bala_gamer:
I9100G replacing I9100 is not true, Until the stock arrives for I9100 , the"G" series will be replacing it.
[Galaxy S II General] spoiltz:
The thing is, to meet the demands of I9100, Samsung pushed I9100G, quietly, so that the demand doesn't dies out.

Also, as i was informed by the Samsung People, was that I9100G, will be available from now on.
[Galaxy S II General] micmaccc:
malaysia

in my state, no more non-G version :eek:
[Galaxy S II General] ambar_hitman:
Can you confirm why 2.3.6 or 2.3.5 or even 2.3.4 not released for I9100 in India?

Also, all online retailers selling I9100 have increased their prices in one day, hinting that I9100 stocks are limited.

Unfortunately, most Asia-Pacific markets wont be having I9100 anymore. Its already stopped in Malaysia, even proper I9100G boxes are there. They announced it on their Facebook as well. Soon, it will be the same in India.
[Galaxy S II General] netchip:
OMAP is better than Samsung chipset.

Okay, the processor is almost equal to Exynos.

Only Mali 400 is beating SGX540 (I've it good?).

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II General] khartaras:
Wrong. The Exynos chipset is the fastest processor on a phone to date.

The OMAP4430 in the G is not anywhere near as good as the Exynos.

The Mali-400 is faster then the SGX540 by a mile.

The 9100G has inferior performance then the 9100.
[Galaxy S II General] netchip:
OMAP 4430 == OMAP 4460 the last one get 7000 antutu WITHOUT OCing, LOL

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II General] spoiltz:
Guys, guys.... the thread really doesn't make sense if we get back at each other like this.

Being in a community, every one has right to express their views.Be it Wrong or Right.
[Galaxy S II General] spoiltz:
U are right buddy, Mali 400 beats SGX540.

Also, Exynos was the chipset designed for best phones of samsung. TI OMAP, is comparitively not so new, and nxt gen.
[Galaxy S II General] Jasonhunterx:
I've seen Mali lose in some open gl benchmarks to sgx 540 in the optimus 3D an when it does beat Mali its not by a lot an I think To has best gpus that's y Samsung used it in the Og Galaxy
[Galaxy S II General] hakgao:
And here i was worrying so much that ive gotten myself a i9100g. After hearing that the CPU was only clocked at 1ghz, and was built with a completely different chipset, i felt cheated. I was also worried about the amount of DEV support that my phone would be receiving...But after reading this thread a little i guess it gave me some confidence in my phone :D

Is there a reason why the i9100g version was only clocked at 1gz? because ive clocked it to 1.2ghz most of the time...im afraid that might cause problem :(
[Galaxy S II General] override182:
Im from Malaysia here.. its a quite a debate seeing galaxy nexus potential users saying the exynos aint that superb compared to the G variant.. but im not seeing any ICS yet to it despite it having omap just like galaxy nexus itself..

And they compared about the DAC.. is yamaha dac is that bad and is the one in the G variant is damn good till voodoo sound applicable? Thats a debate indeed

I own a 9100 non G and happy with the support it has from the devs for now.. best to say that for now if ur flashing custom roms and kernel, go for the original sgs2 instead of the G variant.. thats all.. the rest is too argumentative
[Galaxy S II General] spoiltz:
I9100G , is clocked at 1ghz, is a good thing for "G".

It doesn't overheats, easily, as I9100 variant.

Also, the battery life is better.
[Galaxy S II General] spoiltz:
OMAP 4460 is faster than OMAP 4430 as expected. However, the similarities between OMAP 4430 and 4460 are many compared to their differences. The main difference between the two is the performance improvement achieved in OMAP 4460 over OMAP 4430 through faster clocking of both its CPU and GPU.

OMAP 4460 is NOT EQUAL to 4430.
[Galaxy S II General] spoiltz:
First thing, Exynos 4210 is way better than OMAP 4430.

Benchmark tests, doesn't display a true potential.

Also, while comparing the sound, it really won't matter. Be it a yamaha dac, or some other. I am completely satisfied with mine I9100' sound.
[Galaxy S II General] spoiltz:
Benchmark tests doesn't reveal the true potential.

As far as optimus 3d is concerned, its 3d phone, not like I9100G.

When google, launches its flagship phone, it takes over with complete control. It looks after the hardware, software, and everything the phone will have. So, decision for including OMAP 4460 in Nexus, was completely google's. And, remember OMAP 4430 is different from 4460(used in nexus). Don't compare these two things.

OMAP 4460 is a competitor of Exynos 4210, not OMAP 4430.
[Galaxy S II General] rsaged:
Hi. I was reading thru and when u guys say that the G variant does not run at 1.2Ghz, how to confirm this?

I used apps to check and it shows real time CPU speeds which jumps (expected) when more load is applied and it does hit 1200hz.

Pls correct me if im wrong but does that show that its not capped at lower CPU speeds?

BTW i am using the "g" variant and i couldn't be more then happy. Hope those who wanna buy will buy :) I can play shadowgun, asphalt6 HD etc... I am also running 2.3.6 via OTA.

EDIT: Using Antutu i got 5k plus. Is that ok?
[Galaxy S II General] spoiltz:
U got good score in antutu, even i get 6k,without any tweaks or OC.But, benchmarks doesn't matters.

I9100g is really a good phone. For now, only the dev support lacks in comparison to i9100, as the latter is here for quite a time.Processor too, is on par with each other.Rest, only thing i9100 has a better gpu performance. But, the thing is, u really won't be able to find differences in performance.

Its good thing, u are happy, after all, we have got the most powerful phone in android family for now.

It really doesn't matters, u get a 'g' or non g, both are way powerful thn others.
[Galaxy S II General] rsaged:
yeah true. Thanks

Sent from my GT-I9100G
[Galaxy S II General] akira02rex:
Guys the i9100G is almost an exact replica of the Galaxy Nexus LOL. In fact, it's probably "better" in the fact that it has a better 8mp camera sensor (the sensor itself is just plain better at capturing light/detail). I wouldn't mind owning this.

Edit:

For those questioning the 4430/4460 debate:

http://www.ti.com/general/docs/wtbu...ateId=6123&navigationId=12843&contentId=53243

The difference is nothing really for these devices. 720p vs 1080p stereoscopic 3d? who cares, it's not a 3d phone.

The 4460 is clocked higher which they probably were able to maintain this by feeding it more voltage. It's the same mfg process @ 45nm so who knows. But overall performance should be nearly identical.

The cake is here:

http://www.ti.com/general/docs/wtbu...teId=6123&navigationId=12863&contentId=103102
[Galaxy S II General] Jasonhunterx:
That is true but its not just any bench its open GL which is best benchmark its test fill rate of gpu an others
[Galaxy S II General] vnvman:
Guess who's getting ICS next week...woops. There's no question, the original i9100 will always get more support from Samsung, basically it's their most widespread device all around the world. Software > hardware imho...also, how can some people be so sure about the Nexus hardware outperforming the GS2 one? Wait one more week then we'll be able to make kind of a fair comparison between the devices.
[Galaxy S II General] ambar_hitman:
My I9100G benchmark at Stock 2.3.6 with NO MODS:

Stock I9100 Benchmarks:

Source: http://www.indianvideogamer.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=16389&st=7140

Not much difference, eh? And I9100G CPU is capped at 1008 Mhz. If OCed to 1.2 Ghz, who knows how much more the score will be? Also see th IO performance? I9100G even beats the Mali 400 in 3D graphics score?

So can we stop this sh*t? The benchmarks mean nothing. Both phones have awesome performance.
[Galaxy S II General] Andrewtst:
I just hope soon dev support on I9100G as I owning the G version, it seems hard to get non G version at my country already, even Samsung official site has already change to I9100G labeling now.
[Galaxy S II General] sangalaviral:
Has anyone tried flashing I9100 official rom on I9100G???
[Galaxy S II General] vnvman:
Are you serious?
[Galaxy S II General] spoiltz:
You can't be serious. Nobody wants to brick their phones. I9100 ROM's are not meant for I9100G, or vice-versa.

Both got completely different Processors.
[Galaxy S II General] NZed:
im pretty happy with my non-G version. fast and snappy already! lots of roms on the original android and android thread!
[Galaxy S II General] spoiltz:
Same here mate!!
[Galaxy S II General] sangalaviral:
DoomLord rooting kit works for I9100G too. But you need to keep the ram usage above 500MB during the whole process.

No need to have a insecure kernel or anything. Just keep using heavy apps on your device and let the kit do its job. Rooted ZKI1 with this method.
[Galaxy S II General] ambar_hitman:
^yeah, its a nice method. It can be unrooted too, right?
[Galaxy S II General] spoiltz:
Yeah, DoomLord's has an unrooting tool too.
[Galaxy S II General] hahaboy:
lol
[Galaxy S II General] rajarshi10:
I just figured out the I9100G version has more RAM than the I9100 version. The latter is 867 mb compared to .91 gb which is 960 mb to be approximate. Here's one more plus point for the 'G' versions :) :)
[Galaxy S II General] iNeri:
Of course. That's for the gpu chip. Mali 400 use more ram for video processing that power vr. In sgs1 171 of ram are not available for use. I guess that's a why g series have more ram available.

Enviado desde mi GT-I9100 usando Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II General] spoiltz:
Whatever makes u happy mate!!! :)
[Galaxy S II General] rajarshi10:
So all in all. The 'G' version turns out to be better even if the chipset is changed. Right?
[Galaxy S II General] pulser_g2:
Nope lol. Mali > > > > G

This thread is the reason not to believe everything you read on the internet... It's full of people trying to justify their purchase of something less good than the UK/EU model, by presenting stuff as fact...

Just look at the posts, then compare the datasheets. At the end of the day, the G is a version cut down for some markets, to let them get more on the shelves sooner...

Look at availability of development for devices... I only touch the I9100, and most serious devs do likewise...
[Galaxy S II General] NetDevil2:
I'm from Malaysia, planning to get a Galaxy 2 today by sign up contract plan, worry the telco will cheat and give me the G version as I saw their online advertisement was showing the non-G spec, moreover I also called in their support line to checked with them and they told me it was non-G version, not sure whether on that time I walk in to their centre and they supply me with the G version...:eek:
[Galaxy S II General] override182:
As far as i know, maxis and digi dosent have the 9100.. its all the 9100G now for ori sme set
[Galaxy S II General] rajarshi10:
Development my foot. The 'G' versions are exclusive to Middle East & Asia where the 2.3.6 updates are already out. The non G versions haven't got that update yet. Plus the G version is issue less. No pink spot. No lag. No dead pixel & no over heating. And yes, having used both G & non G versions. The G has much better battery backup :D