yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] lithid-cm:
To change it from source just change PRODUCT_PACKAGES (in common.mk) for AdwLauncher to your launcher name.

https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_vendor_cyanogen/blob/gingerbread/products/common.mk

To find your product name from your own launcher from source just look for your local package name in Android.mk.

example for Adw:

https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_packages_apps_ADWLauncher/blob/gingerbread/Android.mk

To add a custom launcher in Settings.apk

https://github.com/CyanogenMod/andr...rbread/src/com/android/settings/Settings.java

line 76 in that file change "com.android.launcher.Launcher" to whatever main activity is there for your new launcher.

also in settings.xml

<!-- Launcher -->

<com.android.settings.IconPreferenceScreen
settings:icon="@drawable/ic_settings_launcher"
android:title="@string/launcher_settings_title"
android:key="launcher_settings">
<intent
android:action="android.intent.action.MAIN"
android:targetPackage="com.android.launcher"
android:targetClass="com.android.launcher.MyLauncherSettings" />
</com.android.settings.IconPreferenceScreen>

Change the "android:targetClass="com.android.launcher.MyLauncherSettings" to your settings class on the launcher. After you compile you should now have a customer launcher available in settings.
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tymico:
Can you tell me where is the PRODUCT_PACKAGE

thank you ～
[HTC Wildfire S] KamiKorose:
Hello guys. I Have problem with my WS CM7 alquez port.

When i start oc(no mather what way - i mean smartass, smartass 2 etc-if they are not STOCK settings)

i have a problem with wifi, 3g data and my music player.

About wifi there was a thread ( i have grey icons, and not connection) but the biggest problem is about music player- i have lags when i turn on my display, the music just creaks, and when I off display, this is happening again. the same when i wanna turn up/down music;/

I don't know what can i do...

Can someone help me?
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] denbeach:
Hey all,

Have a Galaxy S, stock 2.3.5 jvt, rooted CWM3.

The TWLAUNCHER sux big time, i want the stock GGB Launcher, downloaded Launcher2.apk file somewhere on the net, but cant get it to work.

Put it into System/App not working, renamed it to TW3launcher.apk (or something like that), not working...

Can someone help me out ?

Dont want to use ADW or GO etc. just stock ggb ;-)

Thanx !
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] cabessius:
Why don´t you just download it from the market?
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] denbeach:
the version found on the market is for android 2.2

when using this one on 2.3.x you get blurry icons etc...

I want one who's integrated into the system.

Thanx
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Envy64ht:
or you could just use Zeam launcher instead
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] lim_kobe2005:
can use GO launcher instead...
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Envy64ht:
TS said no to ADW nor GO.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] denbeach:
Want to replace the current (default) launcher with the oreginal GGB launcher.

Go, ADW, Zeam, etc are all app's that runs next to the default launcher.

Thats the deal-e-o ;)

Is it posible?....

Yes?... How?

No?... :( ...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Earthdog:
So here we are approaching the 30 day window for returns with ATT.

I previously had a ATT Galaxy 2 and returned it for the SkyRocket because I am in an LTE area. Well I love the LTE Speeds but I have some negatives with the SR and would like some input not flames.

Concerns:

1. Processor is not as fast as the Exynos and the benchmarks support the statement. As a result video's can get choppy.

2. Kernel Development is limited and moving slow.

3. ROM Development is limited and moving slow.

I could live with issue 1 since I think with development 2 and 3 will be resolved.

I am not taking potshots at the development members. I personally have made donations to several members in hopes of stimulating the development and I appreciate all that has been done but it's not moving very well. Each and every ROM has issues whether its MMS or LTE Support or SoD on the kernel development.

So do I stay or go? What are your thoughts are you staying or going?

Does anyone see any solid development on the horizon?

Overall I believe the device is not being adopted a a high enough rate and this is definitely caused by Samsung segmenting the market by morphing this device to each and every carrier. Which has hindered the development efforts for each of these mutated devices.

Thanks for your thoughts.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] xAnimal5:
The sprint and at&t og sgs2 are the most similiar to the International one.

The ****rocket and tmo sgs2 are the mutated ones.

I was planning to get a ****rocket, but after reading about the LTE throttling, bad ppi, and snapdragon chipset, I decided to sell my og SGSII and go with the Note.

Lets just say, once you use the note, you will not be able to use small phones anymore.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] the2rrell:
i would agree, but the note is not LTE ready if you buy it overseas so you can keep it. once it hits the US with LTE i will buy it and will not look back.

for now i am very happy with the rocket, i dont notice this lag in videos or ****rocket talk. i had the sgs2 for a week and was not blown away buy any means in the comparison. do what you will - ITS YOUR phone and you have to live with it. i plan on upgrading to either the nexus if it hits or the Note once it hits anyway so the rocket is just a short stop for 4 months or so till one of thoes drops anyway.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] silver03wrx:
Quadcores are just around the corner. Its pointless upgrading to a dual core. I will gladly keep my skyrocket until i pick up my quadcore sammy device. 4 cores mabye 2 gigs ram and a big super amoled with lte is what im waiting for
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] the2rrell:
+1.............
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] nuwayman:
Only time will tell as far as the development goes. I don't have a skyrocket cause no lte for me. Also now reading about the throttling going on I'm not sure if I care about lte anymore. Now another question for all you lte guys is who is going to return the skyrocket for the lg nitro hd lte coming out in about a week.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] the2rrell:
if its not samsung, im not switching<<<

and it seems ilke it has the same specs as the skyrocket less the screen.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Justinfedor:
My quad score on here (stock) is way better than my infuse. Idc about lte. My phone is always connected to wifi so its whatever. Phones take awhile to get custom roms. Give it some time to settle
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] silver03wrx:
+100...... ive owned htc hero. Htc evo shift.htc evo. Lg g2x. Htc mytouch 4g. Sammy epic. Sammy epic 4g touch. Sammy sgs2. Sammy sgs2 skyrockrt. Sammy moment.. Moto atrix. Kyocera echo.. and definately sammy is much better then moto or htc or lg or kyocera.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] justanothernoob:
Returned my Skyrocket, ordered the Galaxy Nexus and not looking back...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Mortem Tuam:
:eek: ordered from at&t? :eek:

is it available for at&t?

Only thing I don't like is the Nexus has no expandable storage.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] ajamils:
Nexus Prime or Original Nexus? If not prime then I see it as a downgrade instead of an upgrade.

Note is on my radar and that is one of the reason why I switched to blood sucking AT&T from Tmobile....... just so that I can use International phones.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] justanothernoob:
The "Galaxy Nexus".

Not the Nexus One or the Nexus S. I ordered it from Expansys-usa should be here sometime this week. Nexus Prime was just a name they used when the phone was being developed. Cost me $729.99 with a -$20 coupon code for the site. The no SD card thing kinda bummed me out and thats originally why I bought the SR over it but after using google music during beta and now that its out and free. I have realized that 16gb will be enough storage for me since I can stream all of my music through google music. The SR was nice but I really want that stock android experience and not to have to wait for updates from AT&T or samsung. I got burnt out on waiting when using the Infuse. How many times did AT&T promise Gingerbread for the infuse...

If anyone wants the coupon code for Expansys usa its: 20OFFLS
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] arberthebarber:
Skyrocket is a nice device and we'll start seeing roms for it soon. Just give it a month or so.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] AstroDigital:
I think so too, if all I was worried about was ROMs I would of kept my Nexus S but I love the LTE speeds......

I can wait,
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] justanothernoob:
Yeah LTE speeds are nice. But where I live there is no LTE. So The Galaxy Nexus was the right choice for me. Don't get me wrong the SR was a very nice device but I think i'm gonna like my Nexus better.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] mac231us:
....

Exactly..I tried the SGS2 orig because of this Exynos talk..well it was slower than the Skyrocket. In terms of ROM, I have it working complete with 14 toggle mod, camera hack to use power button to click, 3200-3500+ quadrant (if it means anything really) without any special kernels no overclocking etc, no random reboots, no locks to freeze and take out battery etc., NO! SODs, no video lags (whatever folks talk of..have downloaded many videos and play them directly), no MMS issue at all !...Vis Voicemail etc all work..even modified the dialer so that have the Tmob type dialer with extra button for voicemail along side the button for the phone on one side and the messaging button on the other side.

only miss in-dialer video chat (3G direct..not talking of Google talk) that is there in I9000 (orig SGS not SGS2) ROMs and the Infuse (modified dialer there too for direct video chat)..the ROM for the Sky and the T989 do not support this (maybe trying to move folks to Google Talk..do not need that)..neither does the orig

SGS2 anyway

Even have a TMob rom set up for this device with all the above except Vis Vmail..even fixed in-call volume using I727 library files..

wonder what folks are complaining about..do not care 4G LTE all that stuff..it is fast no matter what..

however .lost 70$ because of this Exynos nonsense (in my opinion)..35 restocking fee to return and 35 to change from Sky to org SGS2 back to Sky..my loss the hard way.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] shansmi:
I am not sure why everyone is freaking out on throttling. The SR is a nice device and I have seen no problems with the chipset other than some graphics like the default homescreen image and the boot image being slower than normal. This is no different than when new GPUs come out and all the benchmark apps and drivers have to be updated/optimized for the new hardware. Throttling only comes into play IF you are on an UNLIMITED data plan and you hit the top 5% of all other users on an unlimited data plan. For me around here, the throttling SMS came in last month at at about 6.5GB of usage but I never was throttled after using about another 1GB.

The SR is a nice device that I plan on sticking with until the quads hit.

My only complaint with Samsung in general is their damn bootloader code. But then again the laughs will be on those GS II owners as well once they update. hehehe. That would be a mute point if carriers listened to customers and actually gave them what they want or actually use vs. trying to force things down our throats. In my opinion custom ROMs beat carrier ROMs for one main reason - flexibility. Those authors usually remove the crapola and add back features the carriers like to remove.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] draztikrhymez:
Ill never return mine unless it breaks. Phone is too nice
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] aretzios:
Personally, I find spending $749 vs. $0.01 for something very marginal a little over the top, to be honest. In fact, I would not even consider getting a phone locked to 3G speeds even a marginal gain considering that it does not have any storage expansion. I would regard this as a downgrade. But different strokes for different folks, I guess. Yes, it runs ICS but the Skyrocket would be running this in a few months. In addition, as this is not a phone supported by a major carrier, it would not sell into millions and it would not create the accessory and development support that carrier phones would definitely have.

Now, regarding Android 4.0 vs 2.6.6. ICS is nice but not that nice. It really would not affect much of the functionality of the phone. What does one want to do that cannot be accomplished well in 2.6.6? I cannot think of much. Wow, now you would get to customize the bottom row of the icons and have resizeable gadgets and few more goodies. You would be bored with this in a day or two. Not worth the hassle. I simply concentrate on the functionality that I need.

Now, what I need is good OS-based voice dialing. That is not available even on ICS.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] iRide113:
After playing with both the Sky Rocket and SGS II for about a month each, the SGS II is overall better - specs and use. Development will come to the Sky Rocket surely, although never on the same scale as for the SGS II.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Danielk425:
can I get a big storage wars yuuuupppp lol sorry I don't know where that came from
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Mortem Tuam:
I'm ok with development coming slow. I'm only going to root my skyrocket, no ROM. It works just fine as is.

How's it going Tony :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] tejones36:
Well, this seems more of a troll -- even if you bought the phone day one you have another week - But I'll attempt to correct your innacuracies.

If you previously had one, then you can't go back unless the AT&T store guy was incorrect when I asked about the return policy when I bought mine. That wouldn't surprise me, but I'll be very amused if he's right and you are stuck with the phone unless you want to pay full price.

There's an entire benchmark thread stickied, take some time to read it. The skyrocket is faster on every benchmark, outside of some Quadrant runs, mainly because Quadrant is a random number generator. I benched both the original Galaxy S II (I had it as well) and the Skyrocket, and the skyrocket is faster. Assuming you own the phone, try it for yourself, but there are plenty of screenshots there.

There are a couple of Kernel's, and while I am only using Da_g's, it overclocks quite nicely, underclocks and undervolts to save power, and is quite stable. Exactly what features are you looking for? Entropy makes a fine kernel agreed (even if he is a bit too inflammatory about his opinion of the Skyrocket IMO), but I certainly wouldn't see the community development here as "limited" or "slow". It's open source, you could always contribute if you are unhappy with the progress...

I'm not really a big ROM guy, but it's a new phone - we're not exactly going to have a CyanogenMod daily yet. There's not one for my Kindle Fire yet either, but I'm not complaining about it ... it's been out only a week less than the Skyrocket. (The Galaxy S II is a rehash of the International, so yeah, they have a lot more development time in - after all, it's an old design.)

... Da_G's Kernel 0.4-pre had an SoD issue (for me anyway). 0.3 is quite stable; and that's why it's an actual release. So that's inflammatory and innacurate - if you are going to complain about alpha and beta releases, stick with actual releases. That's just plain silly.

I'd vote you to go personally. :) Good luck returning that phone.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Meilannu:
Had them both and prefer the Skyrocket.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] tejones36:
There really should be some type of theme music that plays for invasion of the trolls. :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] iRide113:
See, it's going to be different for everyone.

I just couldn't handle the screen size. Soooooo big, it barely fit in my pocket haha. My dad loves it though, so I think I am going to sell his SGS II I got him and get him a SkyRocket.

It's been good! Finally have a break from college and can come back to XDA to play around. I miss it. :D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Earthdog:
Wow buddy slow down there a bit. I have been here since the day it released.

I have a Corporate Account and they are quite flexible.

Sorry but if you add a custom kernel and ROM the SGII currently is quite a bit faster and does not have the documented video studders.

I wish I had the skills to help develop but I don't however, I put my money where my mouth is and I HAVE donated to the cause.

Please point me in another direction for another kernel to try. And Da_g's kernel does not SoD for all and .3 is the most stable. He himself is seeing the SoD and is working very hard to resolve this and I am sure he will get this working.

To note I appreciate vocally and monetarily to the Dev's we do have. However this phone has not drawn a big development group yet. Its clear by the donation thread there are many wanting to come to the SR but to date its a small team.

I was simply asking for an opinion and its clear everyone has one as do you.

Thanks for your input.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] andTab:
I would be tempted by the skyrocket but the lack of dev support and the huge size are pretty big turn-offs.

Are there no LTE phones on the horizon that are "normal" size, eg like the Nexus S and Nexus One?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Earthdog:
Have you actually put your hands on one? I personally did not see much of a difference from the Atrix to the SGII and then the step to the SR wasn't noticeable at all.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] GalaxySkyrocket500:
$749 for a phone? lol...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] the2rrell:
my skyrocket was 700....and i will pay that for my next phone.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] iRide113:
I would never pay more than $300 for a phone.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Meilannu:
Maybe for you guys that tweak the phones there is going to be a difference but for someone like me both phones are great. But i prefer the larger screen of the SR because i swear the keypad is a bit larger. Also to me it's faster. Plus the 4G is blazing fast in my area. Best phone i have ever had. Added the PowerSkin to it and I'm set.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] GalaxySkyrocket500:
$700? Where do you live?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] the2rrell:
im not knocking a good deal.....i aint mad, lol wish i could have gotten for that. but i didnt and its ok :D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Meilannu:
Do you know if we will be able to update to ICS? And if so would the phone have to be stock to update?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] GalaxySkyrocket500:
Me neither.. was thinking of getting the Nexus, but will never pay more then $300 for it.....:D

---------- Post added at 08:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:26 PM ----------

I have used the OGSGII and its nothing compared to the SR.. its smaller and if the sgII is faster then the sr then its marginal... I just got damn near 6600 on Antu with stock rom and rooted clocked at 1.72... how much faster you want these things?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] iRide113:
I got my SGS II for $.97 along with my SkyRocket.

Originally when I got my Cappy, I got it for $75 the week it came out without a new contract.

My Galaxy Tab 10.1in was $200 only.

^All of these thanks to BestBuy matching deals. I am going to pick up my Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime 32GB 10.1in for $250 brand new without a contract. BestBuy is the best.

Can't wait for a quadcore tablet! :D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] GalaxySkyrocket500:
Thinking of getting the Galaxy tab 10.1.. here in Houston its $499.. How do you like it?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] iRide113:
It's good but not worth $499.

I would pick up the Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime. Ages ahead of any other tablet out there.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] the2rrell:
got one of those too....have to say i like it alot. its smooth and just as simple to root and rom and kernel up as a phone.

i also paid 400+ that. but it was worth it to me...would never buy apple. i use it just as much as my laptop. and use dlna to stream it to my tv from the couch wich is pretty cool ;)

im just a samsung nut
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] GalaxySkyrocket500:
I thought $499 for steep as well... They did mention this tablet you are speaking of with high regards.... Looks like its very nice and will have ICS and be around $500 or so...:D

Should be out very soon..
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] iRide113:
Not even a question it will be the best tablet out there right now.

The Galaxy Tab was the best Ver1 tablet out there, but now the Asus Transformer is the best (and only) Ver2 tablet out there.

Here are some comparisons.

Online, Sam's Club had it on pre-order for $250 during Black Friday. I went to BestBuy to see if they would match it. With hesitation they did. They won't match special sale prices, but since the add had no starting dating (only an ending one), they agreed to match the price.

If you wait till the beginning of the year, you will have tons of deals on it. Best deals are always right after Christmas.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] GalaxySkyrocket500:
Thank you for the info.. but question is can I wait till after Christmas?:eek:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] iRide113:
You could always buy it from BestBuy for the full price and when sale prices come, go in and get them to give you store credit for the difference. ;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] GalaxySkyrocket500:
Wow.. they will do that? Im in!:D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] iRide113:
They have done it for me time and time again! Don't quote me on it, but call them and ask them, or if you can find it on their website then you should be good. :)

It's somewhere on their website for sure!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] GalaxySkyrocket500:
NIce!.. Now I won't get any sleep till December!..lol...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] V@no:
Why not? Or you could just return it and get new one for the same price. With that they will loose more, so it's in their best interest to give you the credit ;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] AllGamer:
re: Development / ROM

there are plenty of Development going on, and CM7 is in alpha state for T989 / I727

anything found on the T989 can be applied on the I727, including ROMs with a minute tweak

and if you guys haven't looked over the fence, the T989 Deving is going strong
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] 00mred00:
They will for 30 days 45 if you are a silver member

The only time they will not match are black friday through cyber monday, out of stock items and online items are hit and miss

I am definitely bummed i missed the transformer deal....completely missed that one

As for this topic...i had the chance to test both the skyrocket and sgs2 prior to release and I am glad i waited for the sr. the phone is a beast and lte rocks.

Both are great phones. the .3" size difference is minimal either way.

My only complaint is lack of accessories haha. dev work is already progressing much faster than previous phones from this year like the infuse and thrill so i am good.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] iceman4357:
Although its pure android and will have lots of development, I think its a step backwards with respect to hardware. I am going to keep the Skyrocket, and wait for the quad core Samsung phone for next year.