yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[HTC Incredible S] incrediblealex:
How is this kernel for battery life? Cm7
[HTC Incredible S] zukri90:
Is it good on cm 7.1 stable release?
[HTC Incredible S] Nonverbose:
Is there any support for this kernel? What about source code?
[HTC Incredible S] sif2010:
Does it have loop support ?
[HTC Incredible S] vieose:
Is there a Mirror? Multiupload seams down
[HTC Incredible S] ajeya:
http://www.4shared.com/zip/VC9M-tPU/lordmodUEv85-CFS-VIVO-20.html
[HTC Incredible S] khaidir84:
im using CyanogenMod-7.2.0-IncS-KANG with this kernel v2.0

keep restarting.. dunno why..

O/C: 122min - 1700max - Ondemandx

Quadrant: 3230 :)
[HTC Incredible S] LorD ClockaN:
rise voltage for max freq ;)
[HTC Incredible S] ajeya:
hey you promised us a new kernel after this to improve the small bugs...please if you get time then provide us with it...your kernels are too good :)
[HTC Incredible S] inSaN1Ty_X:
Does this kernel work with Virtuous Quattro or is it only for CM?

Both AOSP and so on? Don't kill me if this was stupid to ask :D

Edit: Nvm, tried and didn't work
[HTC Incredible S] bigeyes0x0:
Yeah I tried latest kernel in the first post and the Camera acting really funny :D. It only captures picture during screen rotation regardless if I'm in camera or camcorder mode.
[HTC Incredible S] ajeya:
gingerbread aosp only.
[HTC Incredible S] vido.ardes:
This kernel is for any AOSP GB ROM, Quattro is ICS
[HTC Incredible S] shiromau:
wat are the features of this kernel??? does it hav sweep2wake??? and wil it work on my phone??? i havin cm10 lacoste n m a s-on user...
[HTC Incredible S] -Maverick-:
It's a AOSP Gingerbread kernel, DON'T use it on CM10! :eek:
[HTC Incredible S] Splux:
Read all the other posts... and you'll realize that this kernel is for AOSP GB (like CM7 and MIUI) and not AOSP JB.
[HTC Incredible S] kcface:
Kernel is for "non-sense" roms as stated by Op.
[HTC Incredible S] vladabiber:
You've just responded to year-and-a-half old question :D:D
[HTC Incredible S] psone1:
Links not working, anyone can upload link to this kernel? Or any other kernel working with miui v3, I try only tiamat, rest links dead

Wysyłane z mojego Incredible S za pomocą Tapatalk 2
[HTC Incredible S] 072665995:
Hey can you not? Thread is dead -_-

Find another kernel.
[HTC Incredible S] skazi-parol:
Grab this!

Not so bad. I found the desired file from the Chinese. Found the file name.

http://dl.dbank.com/c0pg24mina
[HTC Incredible S] psone1:
I'm search but I don't see nowhere this kernel, you are the greatest! Thank you very much!

Wysłane z mojego Incredible S za pomocą Tapatalk 2
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] CandyNJ66:
I am happy with my Nook Tablet with HD Netflix HD Hulu Plus, BUT I got my eye on the Prime. Will the Prime be able to have these 2 apps working without jumping through hoops??
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] xTRICKYxx:
Netflix will run fine as it will support 3.2 and 4.0.1+ for sure. Hulu Plus? Most likely.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] Bimboy:
That's totally up to Netflix and Hulu. I think that with we might be able to use them out of hte box with HC, but the big question is if they would work on ICS. Given their track record of making slooow changes, I'd wager we might have to wait for ICS versions to work.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] XXX-KP:
..hey from where did you got this application for the tablet ??

because i have installed this newer android ICS update and i am not able to install those applications however !
[Off-topic] jburnette87:
Looking for a quality headset.

Here's what I want/need: multipoint,caller id,ability to listen to music,GREAT SQ on both ends.

Looking at the Blueant q2,jawbone icon hd,jawbone era,plantronics voyager pro hd

Anyone have any experience with these, or any other suggestions?
[Off-topic] jburnette87:
Hello
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] paolinhos:
Hi all, i've make a mistake and uninstalled the gallery 3d apk from system app remover.:(

Did you h'd the link for the gallery.apk of my Xperia Ray Android 2.3.4.

Tx and sorry for my bad english.:rolleyes:

Edit: i've found the one from se arc (i think it's the same)tried to install but i havent succes,at the end it say installatio unsuccesful, tried change permission but didn't worj. What can i do?
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] masterflai:
If your problem still exists, send me a PN.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] paolinhos:
i've reinstalled all the sistem with pc companion, sorry, read too late your post, tx however.:D
[T-Mobile LG G2x] Dameon87:
Lets keep all discussion in this thread please.

Development thread : http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1309620
[T-Mobile LG G2x] erikiksaz:
great work on the touch screen! you guys are awesome.
[T-Mobile LG G2x] xile6:
OK so the hold up now seems to be LG right? in search for lg device drivers?
[T-Mobile LG G2x] :
I think its ready for a ALPHA test now.. touchscreen works 100% and so does the radio wifi etc.. hardware acceleration wont be coming anytime soon but i can live without it for now
[T-Mobile LG G2x] Dameon87:
There are a lot of things that will need to be ironed out before we can even consider a beta.

First hand, without hw acceleration the phone crawls.
[T-Mobile LG G2x] regP:
and hardware acceleration isn't possible without updated drivers correct?
[T-Mobile LG G2x] Dameon87:
Correct unless some kind of workaround is created.
[T-Mobile LG G2x] epicsquare:
Hope you can get HW acceleration to work soon. Can't you do whatever other roms like cyanogen mod did?

Its not like they got exclusive access to tegra drivers...
[T-Mobile LG G2x] TerryMathews:
The problem is the binary blob implements hw acceleration according to the way Gingerbread expects it which is different than how Honeycomb and ICS do it.

I've seen at least one person talk about rewriting the library from the android side to match how the nVidia blob works. Which would be a good backup plan if LG renegs on the ICS update for our phones.
[T-Mobile LG G2x] xile6:
Doesnt work like that. And cm doesn have android 4.0 for the g2x only gb 2.3.7
[T-Mobile LG G2x] epicsquare:
I understand it's not as easy as copy paste source code, but the strategy should be the similar. I've never done any low level development so I'm just shooting in the dark here.

Also cm9 is expected in 2 months and I assume it will support the g2x. I wouldn't count on lg for anything. So rewriting the library is probably the best bet.
[T-Mobile LG G2x] ericalanMICHAEL:
Glad to see so many new people jumping on and helping out. I'm sure most people here would help if they knew how.

Thanks for the work, guys! Where can we donate?
[T-Mobile LG G2x] babyinablender:
I've been a lurker on these forums for a long time and never realized I had to have 10 posts to post in the developer forums, so at least I can post in this thread. I will be getting up to speed on the ICS source over the next couple days and hope to join the effort in development of the port to the g2x as soon as I have my dev environment up. I'll be sitting in the IRC channel to ingest the info on where you guys are at so that I can jump in and help with any parts (sound maybe?) that you guys need assistance with.

Great job so far, hopefully I can be of assistance.
[T-Mobile LG G2x] mackster248:
There's never such a thing as too much help. :)

I'm sure you can provide something good to the already great team working on this!
[T-Mobile LG G2x] SefEXE:
NEW video on the front page of the development thread!... although most will probably look at that thread before this one, lol.

But anyways, the touchscreen is fully working now!

The speed of this devving is amazing! I commented on the video already, but wow you guys are doing an amazing job! Thanks for all the effort you're putting into this!
[T-Mobile LG G2x] regP:
Well seeing as the O2x is getting ICS we should be seeing a fully functional ROM afterall :D
[T-Mobile LG G2x] Grooveoriented:
Thought I read somewhere that they weren't working it for the G2x? Or at least not any time soon?
[T-Mobile LG G2x] iswope:
Actually, CM9 has been running on the G2x since Thanksgiving and according to a dev running well. They're still testing so aren't ready to release anything yet but we'll have it very, very soon.
[T-Mobile LG G2x] TerryMathews:
I'm very curious to see it in action.do we know if it's accelerated graphics or framebuffer?
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] tqk:
been doing some research online and alot of peeps recommended this site with unlock stuff. i have a used T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S 4g, Model #sgh-t959v. i see that most the utube stuff is pretty old. So if any has the time can you post a step by step directions to unlock this phone for uses on Att&t networks. Also can't seem to find that generate key zip file. please help thanks
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] vgcraze:
Are you looking only for a video guide? Because there are a few references to step by step text guides when you search "unlock" within these sub-forums.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] jager555:
Just call up tmobile and ask for an unlock code. It is free and painless. There are many great guides, but this is the easiest and safest way.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] Alfred E.:
Exactly. They WANT to keep you as a customer and they do not really care if your phone was initially locked to another network. Call customer service, explain the situation and you will be able to unlock for free. If a fist tier customer service rep gives you the runaround, ask to speak to his/her manager.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] tahirakramch:
I am using Samsung Galaxy Ace. I have default settings that are phone fetched from SIM card. But my MMS is not working. I can use GPRS.

When I was using Froyo, problem persist. Now I have flashed my phone with GB 2.3.3. But issue is still there.

Any one can help me on this?

Attached file contains screenshot of my MMS settings.
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] shawnhoong:
Hi I have to ask and I've tried searching and I came up with nothing.

I recently upgraded my stock Froyo Samsung Galaxy SGH T959 which I had rooted to Gingerbread by flashing on Odin3 v1.82. The problem now is that I used the rom for a GT-I9000 instead. So, pressing the home button does nothing but move stuff to the left. Is there a way I can get my phone to run the appropriate Gingerbread rom for SGH T959?

My concerns are is it safe to immediately flash to 2.3x for the SGH T959 or is it safer instead to downgrade it to 2.2x then flash it to 2.3x?

This is the information I get from Settings>About phone

Model number: GT-I9000

Firmware version: 2.3.4

Baseband version: I9000XXJVQ

Kernel version: 2.6.35.7-I9000XXJVQ-CL281085 se.infra@SEP-39 #2

Build number: GINGERBREAD.XXJVQ

In using Odin3 v.182 I had ticked 6 boxes "Re-Partition, Auto Reboot, F. Reset Time, PDA, PHONE, CSC. I also had used a PIT which was "s1_odin_20100512.pit"

the .tar's I used for PDA/PHONE/CSC were;

PDA:PDA_XXJVQ_Sbl.tar.md5

PHONE: PHONE_XXJVQ.tar.md5

CSC: CSC_OXAJVQ.tar.md5

I hope whatever info I gave was relevant and I anticipate and thank you in advance for any help that you can offer.
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Sugartibbs:
Its your phone, but i would not do it. your about phone 19000 model shouldnt be the, and the button issues need to be addressed. If you think it will overwrite the gt, it may not,it could brick. Id start over. My opinion.

I mean stock, 2.2 may brick too, get more info.
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] bigtom624:
You need to flash your phone back to stock JDF Rom with Odin and start over with a GB Rom made for the Vibrant.

Get the AIO Vibrant toolbox from the top of the development thread. Make sure you read the instructions first and you'll be fine. Good luck.
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] shawnhoong:
So if I flash back to stock JDF Rom with Odin using this link http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=734475, why would I need the AIO Vibrant toolbox for? Also where can I get a GB Rom made for the Vibrant? I look around and I see unstable custom roms like cyanogen 7, etc etc. Also I tried searching for the AIO Vibrant toolbox and I can't seem to find the download code. Thanks.
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] bigtom624:
The AIO toolbox has all the JDF files included in it. That's why I suggested you use it. It is in the Development section at the top of the page. You can use the files in the link you provided also, they are the same ones that are in the toolbox. It is just easier to use it since its just one click to flash it. As for CM7, it is very stable. I have it running on my Vibrant now and have be using it for months. I get around 20 hours of battery. I would suggest using Eugene's Kernel with it also. It is in the development section under CM7 Streamline Kernel. Give it a try. You wont be disappointed.
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dasatti:
I did the same a couple of days ago. You can see my thread here http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1363535 . With GT-I9000 Rom the volume buttons of my phone swapped. Search button stopped working (infect started working as Right arrow button). media speakers of my phone also stopped working.

I used AIO tool box and it worked like charm and my phone was back to Eclair in few minutes. Just make sure you follow the instructions carefully.
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] shawnhoong:
Well after a whole day of testing around I soft bricked it once and managed to get it back to Eclair then back on to Froyo. Right now I still don't dare to play around and try to upgrade to Gingerbread. At least not until I back up my current rom and know how to use it properly.

Bigtom624, 20 hours of battery life is amazing! I'll definitely give CyanogenMod7 a try. What do you mean by Eugene's kernel by the way?
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] bigtom624:
Here's a link to the Kernel. http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1324212 After you set up your phone with CM7 download it and flash it in CWM and you'll be good to go. Since your new to all this flashing I suggest you read as much as possible before you try anything. So many people hear don't and the wind up messing up the phones. I don't mind helping anybody cause I was new once, but you have to do some things yourself if you want to learn. Let me know how you make out. If you need any advice let me know. Here's the link to the AIO Toolbox http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=954509.
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] djjonastybe:
*#*#4636#*#*

I went there messed with some GSM WCDMA settings. When I set it to GSM I can send text messages without error.

After reboot I am getting errors again but my friends can receive my messages.

Anyone know whats wrong? I think I need to reset my /efs. I do not have a backup however :/
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] AeroEchelon:
I had a similar issue once before though I could recieve text but not send.

All I had to do was rewrite the SMSC number which is based off the carrier your with.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] zevrosenthal:
I just got my Nexus yesterday (from Negri Electronics) and comparing it to my SGSII:

Nexus is rooted and I've installed CWM - otherwise "stock" ICS

SGSII is running CheckROM RevolutionHD 3.1.1

Quadrant Standard for SGN is 1891 v. SGSII is 3648! - any idea why the SGSII is so much better?

Speedtest (with both phones sitting next to each other) is SGN 4.573UP & 1.554 down (H+) and SGSII is 4.634UP and 1.639 down - pretty much the same even after a couple of tries.

While I'm loving ICS and the better screen resolution, I'm having a hard time letting go of my SGSII. When you exclude the screen space used for the "virtual" buttons on the SGN, you are left with essentially the same size screen on both units. Also, even though the SGN is really only a little bit taller than the SGSII, it really (IMHO) makes a difference.

This is going to be tough. Any reason why the quadrant performance is so much better on the SGSII?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] bangdrum:
Who cares. Quadrant doesn't mean ****. Use the one you like better.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] player911:
Well ICS uses the GPU for acceleration in its apps. Perhaps ICS is dedicating a chunk.

Benchmarks are useless anyway. Our G2xs can be modded to read over 7000.

You also need the SGSII on ICS for any decent comparison.

G2x - 2.3.7 CM7

Transformer - 3.2 Revolver OC/UV
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Chris95X8:
Really? You compare phones by quadrant results?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] nikosrs4:
well, what feels better/faster to you? :rolleyes:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] martonikaj:
Quadrant doesn't matter. Does the phone perform the way you want it to? Is it smooth? Then who cares?

If bragging about quadrant scores is that important to you then keep our SGSII.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] qreffie:
For starters you're comparing a mostly stock phone to a phone with a rom that's been optimized to run better. You're also using a benchmark that hasn't even been updated for 4.0 yet. When the NS came out you had to run it 5-10 times before it finally finished and gave you a meaningless score since it wasn't updated to run on 2.3 at the time. And let's not forget, it has to render the graphics at nearly double the resolution of the SGS2. Give the phone time to stretch its legs, it'll show you how good it is. Besides, benchmarks really only good for posting screenshots on online message boards.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] farfromovin:
Quadrant doesn't even run both cores correctly. Besides that, the GS2 has better CPU/GPU. However, it doesn't have the screen or, the developer support that the GN will have. Personally, Id have a hard time shelling out the cash for a GN if I already had a GS2...

That being said, I'd never consider getting rid of my GN for a GS2 if that makes sense.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] kindiboy:
so you using the phone doesn't matter? You would prefer what a software that hasn't been updated in over six months to tell you which is better?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Hunteres:
nexus is flying machine! and even with revolution HD

there is no lag, no delay... everything is blazing fast! and i had SGS2 running cognition...and i can tell without any benchmark that it was not as fast as GN is!

remember this is pure android - vanila - and its need some time to get over developers that will make it even faster. and once SGS2 will be running ICs we can do a reall test. but at this stage any results are pointless mate.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Baguett:
Why did you buy the Galaxy Nexus if you want the best benchmark results?

If i had an SGS2 then the only reason to buy the GN is ICS and the design (maybe NFC too), you dont buy it for the specs obviously.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ericshmerick:
Before someone chimes in about the GNEX camera sucking, it really doesn't. It may not be as good as the SGSII (I owned it, so I know) but it's perfectly serviceable for a phone.

Took today while on a hike...

It's obviously compressed so I could attach it. The original file is crystal clear.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Eclair~:
The Samsung Galaxy S II has a significantly better SoC than the Galaxy Nexus. It is no surprise than the Galaxy Nexus doesn't hold a candle to it in benchmarks.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] pukemon:
Why am i having deja vu? Of deja vu? Lame thread. And lame comparison.

Sent from my samsung gt i9250 which is in the wrong country.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] whatzup282:
Quadrant scores don't matter due to the fact that you have to compare the two devices using the same rom. once ICS is on the SGS2 then there will be a comparable quadrant score.

But can't wait till I get my hands on SGN in a few days
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] treUse:
probably not, the sgs2 has a better gpu
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] darkhawkff:
I don't really know where you get off saying that...

The SoC isn't really any better. And consider that the GN also is running underclocked.

Anandtech Article

That should really say it all.

Also, chiming in to say that benchmarks like Quadrant really don't mean much overall. Keep the phone if you like it.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] zevrosenthal:
Wow! A lot of responses. Thanks to those who helped me understand the differences between the phones. I've only had the SGN for a little more than 24 hours so don't yet have an opinion on one over the other in day2day use. Love the screen resolution on SGN and ICS in general though hard to find anything to not like about the SGS2. Hopefully future ROMs & enhancements will make the differences even more pronounced. Usually my "old" phone goes right on sale as soon as I've configured the new one. In the case of SGN v SGS2, I think I'll keep the SGS2 for awhile longer ...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] pewpewbangbang:
ugh....so many clueless pointless remarks and evidence to back their comments.

To the person that said the SGS2 doesn't have the type of developer community the GN has. You do realize the SGS2 has the largest developer backing of any phone right? It's larger than the Nexus etc...Galaxy phones have always had large developer community and backing since the original one came out and its not changing I wouldn't really worry about one having a larger community than the other as they are both going to be huge.

The Galaxy Nexus is more of a side upgrade than a complete full upgrade (thats what the SGS III is for).

Galaxy Nexus has advantage of vanilla 4.0 ICS and a larger 720P screen that also performs better than the SAMOLED + on the SGS II.

CPU - might as well toss it up as a tie, the TI OMAP has some things that make it favorable for ICS

GPU - no competition the MALI destroys the older SGX 540 even if it is over clocked.

Camera - the SGS II is better but it doesn't really matter, the 5MP on the GN takes fine shots and really you should be using a point and shoot or DSLR if you want real photos.

Quandrant is not a good way to see what phone is faster since its become really pointless lately and can be cheated. It's also not updated for 4.0 ICS as others have stated making the scores even more pointless.

But yea, don't really see the point at all of dishing out $700 for a GN if someone already has an SGS 2.

SGS 2 on ICS will likely be faster than the GN though just due to the MALI GPU and exynos being probably one of the fastest clock for clock. And initial benchmarks from the Galnet ICS show the SGS 2 getting some better scores on things like sunspider but they're close enough.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] InternationalNexusFan:
I have tested both the Galaxy Nexus and the T-Mobile S2. The Nexus is worlds apart better.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] pewpewbangbang:
and what exactly makes its worlds better than a SGS II? Take note the T-mobile one runs on snapdragon and is slower than it's exynos counterparts. Reviews have said it feels slightly slower but of course not a total killer since samsung uses hardware acceleration.

I've also played with a GN and while the screen and ICS are beautiful....don't see it as being that much more amazing than an SGS II. SGS II might even feel more fluid while being on gingerbread. Engadget also thinks the SGS II and Galaxy Note feel faster on gingerbread while the SGN is on ICS. So i can only see the SGS II and galaxy phones being faster when they actually get ICS.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] matt2053:
This is not a very scientific statement, but you'll get the idea:

Every time the S2 draws or displays a frame, it has to push 384,000 pixels.

Every time the GN draws or displays a frame, it has to push 921,600 pixels.

Yes, there are almost three times as many pixels on the Nexus display as there are on the SII display. So we have three times as much visual information to render.

If the S2 was pushing 921,600 pixels, I think it will still win the benchmarks because Mali GPU is a beast, but at least it would be in the same ballpark, because the difference in hardware is not much at all.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] pewpewbangbang:
Well we already know what kind of performance an SGS II with an HD display would get.

Galaxy Note ;)

1280x800 display using the same exynos/mali combo but clocked at 1.4ghz and it gets even better scores than a stock SGS II. So it's safe to say exynos/mali is better even though the galaxy nexus is running a 1280x720 screen.