yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] osm0sis:
They're just in order for the Governor Control tunables dialog in f.Ku, skipping boost because it's useless. All are divided by 1000 with the exception of go_hispeed_load since it's a percentage.

a_h_d / g_h_l / h_f / m_s_t / t_r

You should be able to figure it out based on those abbreviations. :good:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Khrushy:
Aggravated Hirsute Dwarves / Green Hawaiian Ladyboys / High-as-a-kite FranciscoFranco / Miniaturised Siamese Twin / Total Recall

And not the 2012 Total Recall, the original of course. With Arney.

Also, don't ask me for details of what 15,000 aggravated dwarves are capable of, but lets just say it's not pretty.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Controvrsy046:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Just curious, is r361 the final GNex kernel?

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Fenvarien:
AW: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

No, the next Milestone M7 is just around the corner. Just give Franco the time he needs, no reason to hurry. Until then r361 is the latest and greatest ;)

GNex with franco.Kernel r361 / CM10.1
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] malaroth:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Anyone still remember or have the link to rooting without pc posted a couple thousand posts ago? I don't have adb or Odin installed on my comp and remember an exploit to root from your phone. I have root now but want to install a vanilla rom that can be rooted but isn't and damned if I can find the post. Spent 1 hour 10 mins so far searching

JBSourcery 4.1 Franco 361 FTW! Keep the Magic alive!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] The Gingerbread Man:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Youl probably find what your after in here http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1812959
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Fenvarien:
AW: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Testing the N7 tunables now with ROW. I'm thinking about 30/96/1.0/45/15 to make this more battery friendly.

GNex with franco.Kernel r361 / CM10.1
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] joaquinf:
That's actually less batt friendly :p

According to yellowdie's post:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] osm0sis:
Nah he got it right. ;) higher = better battery for a_h_d.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] irminsul:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Regarding to worsened battery life with the n7 tunables: I don't experience it at all, battery is equal or better.

In my experience my phone feels a lot less warm during heavy usage with screen on, with previous settings it could get really hot. Now not hot at all! It could point on less battery use
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] vlc_marcos:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

can someone explain me this what it means where can I change and for what. I thanks
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] osm0sis:
1 page ago. READ.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] supernova_00:
Have you tried Minooch and Franco's ROM? I've never had any problems, sips battery, no SODs, doesn't come with any junk, you'll just have to update to the latest gapps and franco kernel once you install.

GSM (maguro): http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1790532

CDMA (toro): http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1855272
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] osm0sis:
Now that's an interesting point. Maybe it really was oscillating even though it wasn't visible from the CPU states or performance impact. The oscillation might cause it to heat up a bit more, so now that we fixed the tunables to match the new interactive and avoid that, it runs a bit cooler? That'd be pretty sweet. :)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] joaquinf:
doh you are right. Somehow i was thinking that he was going to 30000 from 60000 on the gnex magic tuneables not from 15000 on the n7 tuneables

My bad :p
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] RevengeFNF:
He is going to release the M7, but probably that one will be the last of him. He is now focused on N4, N7 and N10. No time for the Galaxy Nexus.

Personally, i changed to Lean Kernel(f.ku supports it), its still being updated and im liking it.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] joaquinf:
Hi guys. I've been testing some new tuneables on the n7 and they gave me really good results on the gnex as well. If you want to try them you will need trickster mod because there is one value that needs to be changed (target_loads) and fku doesn't have the option yet (it will be included, maybe in the next update, no worries ;)) Here are the new settings in case that anyone wants to give it a go, please share your experience

Thanks :)

EDIT: to edit the target_load value you can also use this method posted here by osm0sis :)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] supernova_00:
:confused: What's this target_loads you speak of?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] osm0sis:
Don't be an ass.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Angelakaro:
R: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Don't think so. Franco kernel was and is still the best kernel for galaxy nexus(there's a reason why his app is a best sellers and this thread is the most populated,don't you think?) and i'm pretty sure that franco will continue support our gnexus. r361 is so good that don't need any fix or enhancement,but jelly bean 4.2 still needs a lot of optimizations and this is why our phone isn't perfect. However only with franco kernel we can enjoy almost the max power of a galaxy nexus and that's all

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus usando xda premium

---------- Post added at 03:17 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:15 PM ----------

Thank you,gonna try and share my experience after some normal usage

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus usando xda premium

---------- Post added at 03:27 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:17 PM ----------

However,can you tell me what is target_loads value used for? Many thanks in advance
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] RevengeFNF:
Im not being an ass. Its how things work.

It happened the same with the Nexus S.

He cannot work on all the phones, he also needs to have his own free time.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] joaquinf:
This should give you some light:

This is a good page on the n7 thread to read
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Angelakaro:
In fact! But you said it like franco is betraying us and some people can think that franco won't really update the kernel because galaxy nexus is becoming legacy. Actually,it's normal that he's more interested in newest device development but he left us with a great nightly at the moment and maybe is almost the best he can do for us
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] osm0sis:
Yes, and r361 wouldn't be as good as it is if it weren't for the work franco's doing on the N4, 7 and 10 right now. The man deserves to rest on his laurels once in awhile when the current build is as solid as r361 is, so please, everyone adjust your expectations if you're starting to feel somehow slighted by the lack of nightlies. M7 will also be amazing because of the ongoing work we're doing on the N7 right now. And don't forget a big part of the waiting game is for Google to fix their own **** from JB4.2.x.. After 4.2.2 drops then the whole process of innovation and porting will begin again and the GN will see some more nightlies. Try to avoid becoming too disenchanted until then.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] RevengeFNF:
I never said he betrayed us. I said i understand if he does not have time to update GN Kernel.

Imagine if he was still updating, LG P500, Huawei X5, Nexus S, Galaxy Nexus, HTC One X, Galaxy S3, Galaxy Note, and now N4, N7 and N10. It would be simple impossible.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Angelakaro:
You never said,but the post where you were talking about lean kernel suggests that.

EDIT: However,nevermind. We don't need any reason to quarrel. About new tunables,it seems that my phone is snappier. Going to test what my battery thinks :P
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] irminsul:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

It's a subjective opinion though, but its how I experience how my device behaves. But the fact that the settings are smoother are quite clear and widely experienced. Maybe a M7 is too early now and we need to finish testing first.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] _chanstar_:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Did you do Shiny? I know it doesn't come rooted to keep it stock as possible. In the OP there is a SuperSu zip from chainfire that will provide root when flashing (assuming you still have a custom recovery).

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] osm0sis:
Shhhh.. The troops are restless. ;):p

Also the next page (so 327+328). My layman's explanations of how the new interactive governor scales and what lowering target_loads does could be of some help for people to understand why the tunables need to change too:

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=36974153&postcount=3416

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=36974851&postcount=3424
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] joaquinf:
Please try g_h_l = 85

t_l = 70
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] aR_ChRiS:
TRAITOR
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] osm0sis:
They already agreed to disagree. We don't need you stirring things up again.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] _chanstar_:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

I've also been trying the N7 tunables or close on my N10. 15/99/1/45/15 and it flies smoothly with great battery life and idle time. Left it at 'Charged' 9 hrs ago and it still shows 'Charged'. Such beauty...

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Fenvarien:
AW: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Franco said on several occasions that he will continue to develop for the GNex. Of course his main focus is shifting to the newer devices.

If you look at his G+ account he's currently obsessed by Temple Run 2 anyway :)

GNex with franco.Kernel r361 / CM10.1
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Angelakaro:
My first impression is: less responsiveness
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] joaquinf:
Thanks :) how about 75/90 ??
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] whitedragonz83:
I actually like 65/99/1/45/15, targetload default of 90.

Basically allow for the boost to 1GHz when interacting, but try to avoid keeping there too long. Anything at 700 just feels laggy after doing this a little.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Angelakaro:
R: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Not bad :-/ so it seems that 85/70 is better for battery but less snappy and the others that i tried,90/80 and 75/90, give more responsiveness. Maybe i'm wrong and my impression is not exact,but i think what i just said

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus usando xda premium
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] joaquinf:
I actually feel the exact same way. 80/90 it's still on the top IMO. Same thing on the n7
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] creeve4:
I've been playing around with the interactive governor settings and have noticed some unexpected behavior.

Settings:

30/99/45/15 and t_loads 90.

30/95/45/15 and t_loads 85.

30/95/45/15 and t_loads 80.

In all all cases, the CPU freq jumps to whatever I have chosen for hispeed_freq (729, 1036, 1228, etc) whenever there is any screen interaction. What are others seeing?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] whitedragonz83:
That is how the interactive "boost" setting is suppose to work. Touch screen, go to hispeed_freq for xxxx time (not sure what value it uses, if any that we can change). Then it re-evaluates based on the other stuff "load/etc" to drop down or go higher.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] irminsul:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Wow Joaquin 80/90 is the sweet spot. Lowered g-h-l to 90, all ready had t-l on 80 but noticeable faster. My device is flying as never before. 4.2 started laggy with stock kernel and settings but it's never been as fast as now. All fluid and smooth.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] joaquinf:
Here is a brief explanation

Above hispeed delay = "Once speed is set to hispeed_freq, wait for this long before bumping speed higher in response to continued high load"

go_hispeed_load = "when the CPU hits X% amount of load, then jump to the hispeed_freq."

min_sample time = "how long do I wait before lowering the clock speed from what it's currently at."

timer_rate = "wait this long before changing the clockspeeds from what it's at now."

---------- Post added at 11:55 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:53 AM ----------

:) great to hear. This is pretty much the same i've experienced on the n7. I think we got it
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] stevensoaj:
So, the results you guys ended at are 15/90/45/15 with a target load of 80, correct? Did you use hf of 729 or 1036?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] irminsul:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

I set my n7 to 80/90 on r40, time to test later will report back.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] malaroth:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

That's what I missed... I assumed since I already had supersu pro... ass u me.. duh thank you

JBSourcery 4.1 Franco 361 FTW! Keep the Magic alive!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] creeve4:
I assume you are referring to input_boost. I thought franco disabled that in r361 (or at least the ability to adjust it). In either case, the governor is "boosting" to the hispeed_freq on interaction, not the input_boost_freq like it is designed to do.

Did franco remap input_boost_freq to hispeed_freq? This is the behavior I am seeing.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Angelakaro:
R: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Setting go hispeed load to 75 and target loads to 90 gives the best performance for me. Is so fast that the icons in the battery stats (the ones buid in android) doesn't need to charge, and that was causing some lags when you open that men with previous settings. I took the other settings from the screenshot of joaquinf (a couple of pages ago)

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus usando xda premium
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] stevensoaj:
I thought that this post from joaquinf was suggesting that we shouldn't set the target load_higher than the go_hispeed_load. Did I misinterpret?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] sparkdroid:
I seem to be experiencing a bug using Stickmount 2.2 regarding unmounting of the /sdcard/ when USB media is unmounted. The Stickmount thread indicates that it is a kernel bug:

I am currently using Franco's #361 kernel (on 4.2.1).

I can still access my sdcard by going to /mnt/shell/emulated/0/

But the /sdcard/ link no longer works.

Is this a documented bug? Is the fix known for it?

I am searching for an answer to this but wondered if someone else has experienced it also?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Angelakaro:
R: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

DELETED: i wrote a huge bullsh**
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] stevensoaj:
Are you sure? The first post (by osmosis) on the page he linked from the n7 forums says exactly the opposite. (Sorry if I sound rude, just want to make sure I understand)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] joaquinf:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Correct. I'm using 729

Yes, the target load should be lower than the go hispeed load

Nope. T_l < h_s_l

Read the posts osmosis and I have linked.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] stevensoaj:
Thanks for this. That's what I thought from your post. I have mine set to those settings as well, and it does seem to be pretty smooth!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Angelakaro:
R: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Sorry guys,i edited my wrong post.

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus usando xda premium
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] creeve4:
Interesting reading from franco's git:

cpufreq: interactive: change speed according to current speed and tar…

On another topic, did franco remap input_boost_freq to hispeed_freq? This is the behavior I am seeing.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] malaroth:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Sweet. All set up now, tunables set, rooted. Thanks supernova. This IS pretty much the most stock I can get

Shiny + Franco 361
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] cschmitt:
I don't use StickMount, but no issues when unmounting a USB OTG via the storage menu in CM10, the /sdcard remains mounted.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] supernova_00:
No problem. Minooch has a 6.1 beta up on his site (if you sign up for a beta tester account) that makes the ROM even snappier. I think it includes the newer gapps as well.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] _chanstar_:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Yup!! If you need more boot options, long press 'Power Off'.

The best thing is Wireless Display/Miracast is enabled. So it'll be fun to test once a Miracast certified adapter with official firmware is released. All in all, it runs great with Franco.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] malaroth:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

I also grabbed Franco's simple reboot

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=simple.reboot.com

Shiny + Franco 361
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] galakanokis:
Hot damn! Those new tunables are fantastic. Huge difference in my phone right now especially with ROW set. Got rid a of a number of lags I have been having for awhile now.

Might tweak them a little more depending on battery but I love the way the phone feels right now.

Thanks guys.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] osm0sis:
No he didn't disable or remap input_boost, he just put it back to the hardcoded defaults that Project Butter set, not sure what it's at now with the new interactive changes, but it used to be 1000MHz on stock where hsf was 700MHz.

Anyway if it's jumping too much then we'll have to see about adjusting the above_hispeed_delay to make sure we don't murder the battery. That or shifting the t_l; g_h_l back up to be better balanced between performance and battery.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] supernova_00:
That is built into the ROM. Also, there is an option when you long press the power button to expand the desktop to get true full screen mode. Don't forget to install the paid version of fku because the included one is the free one that hasn't been updated in months.

EDIT: Oh, his app adds icons for the home screen but the ROM does have those options in the power menu or whatever you call it.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] joaquinf:
How about 60/90/729/45/15 t_l = 80? i can't perceive any downfall on performance and should be moar batt friendly in theory
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] osm0sis:
Mailed mine off to Quebec for a screen replacement this morning, so I can't tell you first hand sadly. ;)

Raising the a_h_d the highest it can be without perceivably worsening performance would always be my first step though before calling any tunables final. :good:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] stevensoaj:
I'm going to test this for a bit, then I'll let you know if my results are the same.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] joaquinf:
shoot ... forgot about that. So you are basically sans-nexus. No gnex, no n7 for poor os :(
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] osm0sis:
I have visitation rights with the N7 in the evenings. :laugh:;)

Can't wait to flash r41 when it gets home.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] joaquinf:
LMAO that's the price you have to pay for having split custody :sly:

---------- Post added at 04:27 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:21 PM ----------

I've lowered it to 30k due to some lag using the keyboard
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] stevensoaj:
That's funny. I haven't noticed any lag from use of the keyboard, and I've been texting or surfing the web most of the day.

Edit:

I am however noticing some lag when returning to the homescreen from within certain apps. The problem seems to go away when set at 30k.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] malaroth:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

We had some nice, quiet, friendly days and now everyone wants to argue:P waiting patiently for some goodies to come our way. There's gotta be something in the works

Shiny + Franco 361
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Kapetan:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

If I'm coming from another kernel (Trinity), whe n flashing Franco's r361 as suggested, I need to wipe what?

Cache/Dalvik/System or just Cache/Dalvik?

ROM is stock rooted Jelly Bean 4.2.1.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] anshulajain:
Just Dalvik...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] joaquinf:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

No. There is no need to wipe anything

Smh
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] malaroth:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Although Joaquin.... I DO advocate wiping thoroughly... it's a cleanliness issue ya know? :P

Shiny + Franco 361
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] yellowdie:
In the words of Morfic:

:):D:laugh::good:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] chasy:
AW: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

I'm testing then as well just with 30 instead if 60. These new tuneables really seem to make a difference. My phone feels way better.. Most of the lag seems gone and I was already thinking about going for the n4.. Maybe it has to wait now ;)

One question though.. What is t_l can't find it in my Franco app ^^

** update

Ahh never mind..it's target load,the value we need trickster app to change :)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] malaroth:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Exactly, you can always blow a snotrocket

Shiny + Franco 361
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Kapetan:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Hahaha, good one.

Anyway, what are your color setting for best and accurate color display? Settings I used with Trinity's kernel and defs in TrickerMOD aren't what I want now, screen is somehow different. I can't match white color at moment (to be nice, clean and not yellow-blueish :/).

Ty.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] shreddintyres:
this varies from device to device,

for me i prefer

multipliers 190 195 215 (stock colors that franco kernel comes with)

rgb -5 0 5

-24 trinity contrast

1.2 omap gamma
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] gaich:
Franciscofranco

Some weird things happen with me when I flashed Minco 6.1, minooch said it`s kernel related. Could you chek it please, if you have some time? This is the start of the conversation, there are explanations and last kgsms on the same page...:confused:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] alfiemenace:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

I see many different settings for tunables, isn't this like the color settings where it differs from one device to another?

Stock ROM, custom user.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] whitedragonz83:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

More just personal preference.

I ended up leaving all Franco stock values except changing go_hispeed_load to 99. Feels great.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] alfiemenace:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Followed 15/80/1.0/45/15 and I'm experiencing lags while scrolling on XDA :| so I guess it's result differs from one another. But aside from scrolling performance is good!

Stock ROM, custom user.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] whitedragonz83:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

If you didn't change your target_loads lower then 80 you need to put your go_hispeed_load around 95-99

Some apps can still suck. Try turning the governor to performance. If XDA still sucks then it is a pure app issue.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] alfiemenace:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Yeah I agree, maybe it's an app issue because everything else scrolls just fine.

My t_l is set to default 90, will try changing g_h_l to 95 :)

But which is more preferable in your situation? Lowered t_l to 80 then g_h_l is 90 or default t_l and g_h_l = 90-99?

Stock ROM, custom user.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] tetrakinitis:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Guys one question. From where you change the target load?

Sent from my SmoothCriminal™
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] parkson:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

TricksterMod
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Fenvarien:
AW: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

It's possible to do it via init.d ;) Osm0sis showed how to achieve this over here: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=36995305

GNex with franco.Kernel r361 / CM10.1
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Zixin:
Stil lmy most favourite kernel!!:laugh: