yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] MattSkeet:
Anyone manage to under volt the CPU?? Any value I put I get in to boot loop .... what values you have in the UV menu?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] detritu5:
For the moment. Awesome battery life!! 0% in 1 hour and 10 min
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] pa.pn2:
same here

had to restore stock kernel
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ljwnow:
Haha Franco screwed up. I'm just kidding. I think it's just a simple typo in the program.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] lamecake:
It does teach me not to flash stuff during work hours. Didnt have a stock kernel at hand or a PC with the correct drivers/abd installed, so had to resort to full wipe / reinstall. :d (was stuck at an infinite bootloop) Damn my flashing addiction!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] lonnyrs:
I have to agree with you on this. looks like we're the 1% here. I had the best day of battery life to date on this phone. definitely making a backup of this combo!! Thanks again Franco...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] pa.pn2:
if you have a nandroid of your rom, you can restore just the kernel in cwm, under advanced restore
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ljwnow:
Yeah. No flashing while working. I don't even get any chance to play with my phone in the daytime. And I got really long stand by time... Almost 2 days with light usage.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Brandon3003:
Franco you are the man. Already bought the app but I think you earned yourself a beer or two. Latest kernel is phenomenal. Went to bed last night and had barely any battery drain. Now I can be lazy and not plug in at night without fear. Speeds are also the best so far.

Truly appreciate all your efforts.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] i4mt3hwin:
Did you remove this in 13.1? I can't find the script in etc/init.d.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] lynxboy:
I also had fantastic battery life on #13....

Regards.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] minooch:
Short answer will be no.

Actual tests have been performed, there is NO DIFFERENCE, zip, nil, nudda!

PS: I personally don't take kindly to threats (I.e. you leaving unless you get what you want) - Francisco may have a different opinion, but from me - go, I don't care.

Back on topic, looks good so Francisco, will update when I wake up
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] lamecake:
Battery life certainly is fantastic with Franco's kernel. BUT your graph is showing a glitch that I also sometimes have after using recovery: you lost quite a lot (20%) during recovery use. Rebooted, and then your battery actually charged itself. (Not possible) followed by normal drain.

Anyway. My point being, using recovery and rebooting sometimes ****s up the battery reading.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] lillypad_33:
What ROM is everybody using with this Kernel?

I was originally using Gummy when I flashed Franco's kernel, but I got horrible battery life ( the phone shut off over night ).

Can I just flash this kernel right over top of the ROM or are there any other steps that I missed?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Vangelis13:
Personally I use roman's aokp, great stuff. Seems to be one of the (if not THE) most popular..

But yes, just flash the kernel and you're off.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] pa.pn2:
same here

aokp b19 +francos kernel =awesome
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] lillypad_33:
Thanks Vangelis and pa.pn2

Looks like I'm off to download those two files and see what happens.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] kwurky:
Btw is TUN still in this kernel either as a module or compiled in? I remember seeing TUN mentioned in a past franco kernel topic iirc #5.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] jan-willem3:
Anyone got lower singal since #13?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] dr_drache:
where are these tests?

and are they based on the first round, or the 2nd set of GPU oc code?

because the first round of GPU overclocking was wrong. it never actually overclocked the GPU. the overclocking being done now, DOES. and to be more technical, it's stock clocking for the chip.

it doesn't create more heat, there IS more performance to be had, and you volt it the same. I understand his post is screwed up. but saying this feature isn't coming when your not the dev, is just as bad.

A lot of people feel that this is at least something to be given a test, and IMO it's more important than user UV controls.

*off topic point, why can't you internal testers find these bugs? then maybe Franco wouldn't have to patch **** after he releases it*
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] joaquinf:
Ok this is a recap of what i've tried so far:

All of them have been tested with

row/2048

192/1228

a) 15/90/0.7/45/30/80

b) 30/90/0.7/45/30/80

c) 30/95/0.7/45/30/85

So in my opinion, in terms of smoothness a) and b) are very similar so i lean towards b) for batt's sake but a) would be just fine. When trying c) i perceive some frame drops on animations specially when opening an app from a folder located on the desktop. They all feel smooth though :) Any other suggestions we should include as a candidate?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Angelakaro:
R: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

I think a) is the best for performance but also stability. I'm atm with c) configuration,it's not bad but slower than a),as you said. (However,the best that i tried is 15/75/0.7/45/30/90 but osmosis says it may be too aggressive)

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus usando xda premium
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] joaquinf:
It's not only too aggressive, i'ts a perfect example of setting the tunables the wrong way :)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Angelakaro:
R: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

I know it's wrong,but it feels so smooth and snappy and battery was almost the same :( but you have more knoweledge about this,so i trust you!

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus usando xda premium

---------- Post added at 08:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:14 PM ----------

Also,you asked me to test that configuration 2 days ago. Can you test it again for a while and give me your overall impression?

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus usando xda premium
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] The Gingerbread Man:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

I've been running A on my gnex all day and I find it smoother than B which I tried earlier and looking at C with its 30 ahd I know won't be as smooth as A. The other combo could be ahd 15 and 85 tl to mix things things up a little between A and C.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] osm0sis:
Okay so sounds like we're down to:

a) 15/90/0.7/45/30/80

b) 15/95/0.7/45/30/85

so we have tested all the permutations. ;)

Also, once we've chosen between a & b, are we sure 30 t_r is better than 15 for the GN? We should maybe give that one more comparison with our finalist ghl;tl values.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] whitedragonz83:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

A. Felt great for a day or so. Same as N7 except 0.7 speed. Makes sense due to the smaller.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] osm0sis:
Yeah, I'm of the opinion they're different animals though, given the number of cores and hardware differences, so I'm not expecting the tunables to necessarily be the same.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] joaquinf:
I'm sorry if I confused you two days ago. We've messing with target_loads on the n7 thread for a week now and i t_l is a "newly included" tweakable parameter on the tuneables so there wasn't a standard way to reffer to it. Back on the page 3829 when i said you to try 75/90 i meant t_l/g_h_l as t_l must be lower than g_h_l as it's been explained many times.

For me is quite hard at this point to notice any difference between t_r set to30 or 15 so i'm running some cfbench tests as franco said that was pretty accurate because we are messing with cpu values.

Anyways, i'm always open to listen to different opinions
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Angelakaro:
Don't worry,we're humans :) (maybe :confused:)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Fenvarien:
Version a) is my favorite, I tested it against other variants including b) during the day. Regarding a t_r of "15" or "30", I think we need another test run to get more opinions. Before that, we should make sure, that we agree on all other tunables or we'll get to many mixed (and worthless) results.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] pkgnex:
Timer rate of 30 give me some jitter when swiping through launcher or swiping away recent apps in the memory list. t_r=15, however, is good-to-go!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] osm0sis:
I agree completely. I do think there's pretty much a consensus on all the other tunables now. I didn't see the part where we figured t_r of 30 was better than 15 though, I think we just brought that over from the N7, so that deserves a final test to make sure for the GN, because the tunables don't need to be/shouldn't necessarily the same for such vastly different devices. :good:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Kapetan:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Just to clear something:

15 - is 15k for above hispeed delay

90 - is 90 for go hispeed load

0.7 -is 729600 hi speed freq

45 - is 45k min sample time

30 - is....? target loads?

80 - is...? time rate?

Last two confuses me :/
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] joaquinf:
I think that was me trying to make the tuneables more batt friendlly :p

a t_r of 15 should be ok as we already have tried that here with excellent results :)

So i guess that bring us closer to a final decision :good:

---------- Post added at 04:09 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:08 PM ----------

30 - time_rate

80 - target_loads

Following the order in fku :)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Fenvarien:
So we try now:

a) 15/90/0.7/45/15/80
b) 15/90/0.7/45/30/80

Let the final tests begin :):good:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] joaquinf:
More like:

15/90/0.7/45/15/80

15/95/0.7/45/15/85
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] 93fuelslut:
i need help on overclocking

my droid 4 is pretty fast so i never looked into overclocking cause i didnt want to risk burning up my battery.

but this gnex is a turtle with almost 200mb of ram.

i am running the r361 kernal for 4.2 roms.

so whats a good overclocking freq that would be fast but not so fast it causes problems?

thanks fella's.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] osm0sis:
Most people I've seen comment say that 95/85 is slightly laggier than 90/80, so I'm with Fen, I'd like to see if we can tell the difference with:

a) 15/90/0.7/45/15/80

b) 15/90/0.7/45/30/80

Hmm.. but you're right, maybe lowering the timer_rate to 15 allows us to use 95/85... okay, so:

c) 15/95/0.7/45/15/85

;)

It's got a gb of RAM.. and any good OS keeps most of the RAM used. Anyway.. anywhere from 1305 to 1536. I found with r361 1305 actually runs smoother than 1536 with the default tunables. Perhaps our new ones will fix that. We'll see. ;)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] joaquinf:
I didn't want to take your 95/85 out of the equation just yet that's why i include it. Also you've done a great job with yellowdie before when finding the sweet spot for timer_rate so i think 15 would be just ok, so far people are finding t_r 15 better than 30. I'm sold with 15/90/0.7/45/15/80
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] osm0sis:
Haha yeah but this is a different rodeo now that interactive has changed, so I don't want to count out your 30 just yet either, especially since it worked well on the N7 and 50 worked on the N4. I agree though, sounds like people so far are leaning towards 15. :)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] joaquinf:
ok i'm gonna throw this here (following francisco's advice as i'm not a benchmarks guy :p)

using t_r =30 the cfbench results are

Native score: 10497

Java: 3184

Overall: 6109

using t_r =15

Native: 10378

Java: 3134

Overall: 6031

However, scrolling with t_r set to 15 is much more smooth
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] osm0sis:
Interesting! So 30 performs slightly better. Definitely worth factoring in. I'd like to hear if more people can feel a tangible difference though.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] joaquinf:
I do :p

I found 15 smoother than 30 on scrolling through google + stream, falcon pro and tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] osm0sis:
Funny that it's the opposite of what the benchmarks say, eh? Ah well, it's only a difference of 70 so if we're liking 15 based on feel, then 15 it is. :D
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] malaroth:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Osm0sis.... go dance naked in the rain....(inside an 8x8 ten foot tall fence for our virgin eyes) to bring about the release of 4.2.2 for more awesomeness (though Franco will indubitably work harder to acclimate to the change) but as second in command (sorry yellowdie you're same rank) it is your

duty

to make it happen. Whatever it takes

Shiny + Franco 361
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] pkgnex:
t_r=15 definitely feels better to me to. However, I can't tell any difference between a). and b).
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] osm0sis:
Which a) and b)? Gonna need to be more specific again. We got a little crazy with our a's and b's in the last couple pages. :p

Nahhh I'm not 2nd in any way shape or form. Franco's the Boss Man, and I just have a pretty good memory and know how to Google. ;)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Wynnded:
It's an in-the-process-of-being-updated to 4.2 version of BAMF Paradigm. Not ready for public consumption. I contacted the developer about what I found so he downloaded r361 to have a look at it. Knowing that anything too technical was beyond my understanding, the dev just said that the ramdisk in the kernel was missing things that were needed to get the ROM to boot.

Being that this particular ROM has not been released, I'm not going to worry about it. I'm able to tweak the kernel settings and able to kind of "play along" with you all.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] supernova_00:
I agree! What ever the heck franco changed in the fku app dramatically increase battery life! Don't touch a thing! I got an extra hour of battery life with the setup I've run forever using the same apps!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] The Gingerbread Man:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Who needs over clock when you can play tunables and get more effectictive results for less battery cost :D Im using 15/95/0.7/45/15/85 my gnex is even more ridiculously fast now, seriously it feels about the same as my n7 which is running 15/90/0.7/45/30/80 which is the same as what I was running on my gnex until I changed to these recommended values. So for gnex really all that needs to be worked out now is just the timer rate to be 30k or 15k.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Piccles:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] bigbear6708:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Tr 15 wins for me. Major micro lags at 30
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] jcoleridge:
R: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Now i'm using 15/90/60/15 with target_loads at 80 and hispeed_freq at 1036, 384/1305. I tried to find a more aggressive setup as i'm interested in smoothness, and i think this is the sweet spot for me, as i'm also having really good battery life. What do you think about my settings guys? Are they too much aggressive?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] joaquinf:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

My gnex beats the s**** out my N7 anytime. It is only smoother on games but not even close to the gnex on "everyday" usage
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] The Gingerbread Man:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Perhaps its something to do with the TI cpu being more open than tegra, I was going to say the gnex was built for JB but forgot all about ICS and the n7 was in actual fact designed for JB+ from the design. Guess perhaps just how diffent soc's are I suppose or quad core not yet being fully utilised. Think of the n10 running on that fat 1.7 duel core exynos I bet it runs like a beat possessed :cool:

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] osm0sis:
Alright, seems like enough people favor 15 that we're in the final round now:

15/90/0.7/45/15/80

or

15/95/0.7/45/15/85

both with row, and read ahead 2048.

So far people seem to be favoring the former, but it'd be great to have a few more opinions on the comparison since The Gingerbread Man favors the latter.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] whitedragonz83:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Dropping the tr to 15 helps make the 2nd choice feel better then when it was at 30. Going to test it more.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] 93fuelslut:
what is tunables that u are speaking abt? because i was thinking abt overclocking my gnex since its so slow. but i need battery life for pandora.

how do i run that set up for my gnex?

---------- Post added at 09:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:13 PM ----------

Is this that fku app to do "tunable"?

---------- Post added at 09:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:24 PM ----------

is this that fku app to do "tunables"?

if so, where do i get the app?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] osm0sis:
f.Ku (franco.Kernel updater) is available on the Play Store and from Android Pit. The one pictured is Trickster.

I recommend f.Ku since it supports Francisco's ongoing development.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] 93fuelslut:
so thru any of those 2 apps, i can set my tunable's?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] The Gingerbread Man:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

I know this is off topic but just wanted to point out I made an off topic thread, all are welcome to join if you fancy some 'down time' perhaps maybe get to know more of each other without derailing francos thread (who is more tham welcome to join also) if any of just wanted to discus general stuff then come on through to here http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2119662 hopefully it will pick up more positively soon lol

---------- Post added at 02:45 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:42 AM ----------

Indeed you can, I like osmosis will recommend the fku app (Franco kernel updater) to support him and his work. The ui is nicer than trickster too.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] joaquinf:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Preferably fku but yes you can
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] The Gingerbread Man:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt;

Double post delete
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] 93fuelslut:
Yea my bad. My Internet got hung up so I didn't know if I posted my reply

---------- Post added at 10:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:58 PM ----------

if u were to advice some one, would the top tune above be the better one? i read somewhere, where 95/85 was to aggerasive and laggy.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] The Gingerbread Man:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

The whole point is to test and see what you prefer and make a vote or announce your preferance to one, its taken a fair while to get down to 2 and now we are just going through fine tuning them
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] osm0sis:
Actually 90/80 is the more aggressive one. I'd advise you to read a bit more since you're new to the kernel. Play with just frequencies and scheduler for now. :)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] 93fuelslut:
OK thanks. I was just being cautious in case I brick my phone or over heat.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] osm0sis:
Nah you won't brick it with OCing and there's a thermal throttle and hardware heat shut-off to protect it from any damage. Lots of good reading to be done in this thread. :good:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] 93fuelslut:
yea lol, over 3,000 pages! lol.....if i dont like my tune, how do i go back to default? restore my backup?

i just wish motorola phones had these options like yal do.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] osm0sis:
Yeah but there's a search bar at the top of every thread in XDA for a reason. ;)

Just uncheck "set on boot" then reboot, and cpu will return to default. Otherwise all you'd need to do is press the defaults option in the f.Ku menu, or clear app data+cache on f.Ku, then reboot to clear it all.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] 93fuelslut:
OK thanks
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] malaroth:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

I've OC'd to 1.8 and 54°c for an hour and thermal throttle didn't kick in. I KNOW there's a lot to read and search but the answers are there. #1 rule osm0sis taught me.....SEARCH

Shiny + Franco 361
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] 93fuelslut:
it says r361 is empty..well "activtly not found".
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] moomingstarz:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

The zip for it? I can download it. Maybe you clicked something by accident?

http://minooch.com/franciscofranco/Galaxy Nexus/JB/JB-4.2/zips/
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Fenvarien:
AW: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

95/85 along with a t_r of 15 is perfectly smooth for me, just like The Gingerbread Man pointed out. :good: :)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] 93fuelslut:
That's odd, ur link worked. I guess my phone is just sketchy
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] yumeul:
Are you guys still undervolting while using the tunables?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] The Gingerbread Man:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Nope the voltages are hardcoded for stability so very few sod or reboots going on.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] yumeul:
I see... but my phone is heating up really fast without the UV even on normal usage.. do you experience it ?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] KostasR:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Can someone please post a screenshot of the default Kernel voltages?

Much appreciated :o

Sent with my thumbs using Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] bragih:
Never did any UV-ing before, but I feel like my phone heats up more than it did with the last version. Also the whole system seems more laggy.

Is it normal that the kernel uses about 38% of CPU power at all times?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] yumeul:
Just do a reboot.. it will return to stock voltages
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] The Gingerbread Man:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

Nope, just make sure your max cpu speed is 1228 amd youl be fine.

Uncheck set on boot and reboot or in fku in the right corner youl find the menu button and in there youl find a button to clear the setting

---------- Post added at 09:35 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:29 AM ----------

Maybe you have something running in the back ground. Honestly it doesn't matter how hot you think your phone is, unless you physicly get burn marks from it. No damage will happen unless it exceeds 110 Celsius, even then there is a hardware safety net which forces a reboot at 110 degrees so unless you turn off thermal throttle you can't cook your phone.

If you feel lag try the setting we have been talking about in governor control 15/95/729mhz/45/15/85. Leave boost, timer slack and boost pulse duration alone. These settings make my phone fly, also using interactive, row, 1228/192mhz.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] bragih:
Well there really isn't that much running in the background, but my system sometimes freezes completely. I guess that's an issue that has nothing to do with the kernel though.. Will do a factory reset later.

I tried searching the thread, but couldn't find a lot of helpful information, rather people posting problems: Is there an up to date comparison of the governor's included? Comparing speed and screen time?:confused:

I don't really want to tinker around in the governor's settings since I don't really know what each setting does and I think that's not the best basis for doing stuff like that to your device :D
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] yumeul:
Its running pretty smooth now.. using the settings mentioned above but I still don't get what those values mean...any links where i can read up on it ?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] KostasR:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][GN] franco.Kernel-r361 -&gt; 4.2 | r300 -&gt; 4.1

I changed to Lean to see how that goes because in Franco's battery drainage is quite high especially after 4.2.1. I just want to try his voltages in Lean's and since I don't want to flash kernels back and forth just to take the voltages screenshot, I would highly appreciate your help in this :)

Sent with my thumbs using Tapatalk 2