yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Igor 3:
Love this kerenl, very, very smooth. Im on 1.24 There are two things thats bugging me. My touch screen responsivnes has gone down from other kernel, sometimes and colors seems much weaker. Is it just me, i flashed Siyah and this, back and forth and dont believe that is in my mind.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] panteleimonov:
the live standart around the globe its so different.Here at Bulgaria its about a 6 leva-i can buy food for one day-bread,some meat and a coke :D

i really want to buy the app but..the price really its high :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] danieldmm:
Are you comparing the price of the apk with coke? hummm

Ao many cokes you buy by the price of your cellphone?

Cheers
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] nikzDHD:
And in the UK this costs £2.50, currently you can buy 6 can pack of coke for £1.50 in Asda, wow Brazil is expensive!

Exchange rates are out of our control, blame the global economy!

At the end of the day you don't have to buy the app, considering how much we shell out on our phones, accessories, other applications if you use this kernel and want the flexibility you'll support the dev. If you haven't got the money that's fine, save up until you do.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] :
Please add normal conservative as a module in the next version of the kernel.

Lionheart eats my battery alive.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] snout:
lmao - its about £3 a pint in uk - if your lucky ! In London its about £5+

But I have found a local at £2 :D.

Got The app ! nice work :D

I sniff a new release;)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
1.26 pushed.

Changelog in the usual spot.

Those who have the application can upgrade OTA (I did).

Those who haven't (by the way, I can't even go to cinema with 2.99€), refer to the downloads repo.

How god damnit? We have a sorcerer among us.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] AndreiLux:
Considering the market shows 100 to 500 downloads, I think you can afford yourself a movie or two with 300 to 1500€ 210 to 1050€.

Edit: Wrong numbers, now he can barely afford a movie ticket.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] remorema:
imho you should have priced it under setcpu value
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] AndreiLux:
Negative price? :D SetCPU is free for XDA users.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] freemini:
30% goes to Google. There's 2 devs not 1 too.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Thedonk13:
flashed 1.26 - May have a few issues

- only have lionheart gov

- Kernel Version = 2.6.35.7-Phoenix-v1.25-int+manuel@dreamcast#129

ps - sorry KNZO - i'd buy the app for .99 but i'm not gonna pay 4 bucks US for it...sorry.....maybe it will be Amazon's free app of the day one day! lol
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] panteleimonov:
+1 nice men :D
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
Why do I only see you trying to stirr up confusion in this thread?

The price is set, people only buy if they want to. And your numbers are still wrong (x€ = (nº downloads * 0.7) / 2).

Update again.

On the first run the int version had the config with 1.25, so I had to build again with 1.26. I updated again (via app) and everything is as it should. Regarding lionheart, it's lionheartX, just renamed back to lionheart, it's in the changelog mate.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] lsv-1:
@knzo, Yesterday I installed v1.25 (rebooted the phone twice just in case), as usual, at night I put the phone in flight mode and connect the charger, this morning the phone was off and very hot, removed the charger, tried to turn it on, nothing, took the battery out and that did the trick, the phone started but the charge was at 35% or so.

Do you think that this had to do with the charging currents set by default in phoenix kernel? 500 650 750? If yes, you may need to consider not to change those values.

XXKL1 - Phoenix Kernel 1.25 - No modified kernel settings / parameters at all.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] giorgosaero:
Where i can found the lioheart zip?or is pre-install in phoenix?Sorry for the noob question....
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] lsv-1:
Pre - installed bro...
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] giorgosaero:
Thanks man......
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] 13pointseven:
my phone seems to be charging extreamly slow, taking 5+ hours to reach 100%. It seems to drain fast also.

I'm using a 750ma charger but current widget shows between 300-400? I have formated cache/data/system/dalvik and used samsung cleaning script 1.7 before flashing cm7. Rebooted, again ran cleaning script then flashed pheonix 1.26.

After booting I UV/UC and turned up the charge rate to max using voltage control extreme.

What am I missing here?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] AndreiLux:
Because of the unbelievable audacity and ego that you keep showing here with absolutely no shame at all. You are nothing less than a crook :)

And you didn't answer my first question several pages ago; update your sources as I'm really curious how you ported over a governor optimized for an architecture with a completely different power management system/levels.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] rizcom:
charging currents set by default in phoenix kernel? 500 650 750?

Has no effect if you change the charging currents it will still charge at default are you using a samsung charger
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] lsv-1:
Yeap, you can see the charging currents with voltage control, I'm using a stock samsung charger.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] 13pointseven:
I'm using blackberry charger 750ma/h. Problem started when I flashed cm9 18012012 few days back? Chargers never been an issue before apart from it been blackberry branded :(

Ive had it on charge for an hour turned it on and it was at 38%. While posting on here using xda app its dropped 2% in 10min while its still plugged in? Wtf

So there is no option to change charge currents in this kernel.

Knzo......next build??
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] rizcom:
So there is no option to change charge currents in this kernel? same as over kernels

flashed cm9 18012012 few days back

not sure this could be the problem i'm using checkrom 4 with not charge problems
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] remorema:
maybe because youre the only one who "sells" a kernel where you have to buy an app to activate kernel modules(edit: that arent yours)

Tapatalked from "The ICS Killer"
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] 13pointseven:
I just assumed if there was an app with this capability then there would be a kernel that supports it? This only available on other devices?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] lsv-1:
I didn't try myself with voltage control, but it should do the trick.

Me, I switched to Siyah for now, I'll give it a try to phoenix later on.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] rizcom:
i don't think this would work on this device 13pointseven and it's high risk
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] 13pointseven:
What a tit! Changed refresh rate to 1sec in currentwidget and noticed drop in current when slight movement of connector. Seems the connection on the phone had bent slightly out of alignment. Adjusted and now averaging 600ma/h :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] khartaras:
I think the XDA scene has become a soap opera.

Developers should be working toward a common goal: better, cleaner, faster code. Not bash others.

**** like the drama that has been going on with Lionheart and Pheonix is not only stupid, but it is also childish and completely unnecessary.

You don't like it, you go somewhere else. Developers apparently have grown to like to flame knzo, for a completely stupid reason. From the start of Lionheart, he said that it was a patched and tweaked conservative governor. So what he did was add morfic's and arighi's patches to conservative and messed about with the thresholds. He didn't lie. Apparently, you can't rename a part of your work (conservative to lionheart) without stepping on the collective toes of all the oversensitive developers out there. Get off your pedestal.

About the app: 3€ is the cost.

Google takes 30% - the devs only get 2€.

There are 2 devs, so, applying your utmost mathematical effort, I'm fairly sure you can work out that each developer gets 1€. That's about enough to buy 2 cups of coffee at a café or 2 cokes. You can't even buy a pack of smokes.

And you can use all the modules you like without paying for the app.

You people can be so annoying, god.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] rizcom:
sounds like you fixed it lol 13pointseven

man i need a drink of coke and a smoke :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Thedonk13:
Oh I get it..we can only use different governors and junk if we buy the app..

Ya...uninstalled...going back to a totally free speedmod

It's a strong kernel knzo, but I'm pretty cheap and I've already paid for setcpu

Sent from my phone to your world inside my world.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
We discussed the price for hours and we picked this one even though we knew there were going to be complaints. Ultimately it's our decision and respect it. No one is forcing anyone to buy it and the kernel doesn't need the application to customize it. It's true that it enhances the overall experience but without it it's what you had in void, 1 governor, 1 I/O scheduler, OTB functionality.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tonysac:
Just updated to 1.26 through apk..nice and easy!

Sent from Galaxy
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tonysac:
Just updated to 1.26 through apk..nice and easy!

Where did the downloaded kernel went? I can't find file...usually goes to download folder but nothing there!

Sent from Galaxy[/QUOTE]

Sent from Galaxy
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] remorema:
sure its your choice. but I also have a golden rule for android market. only pay for apps up to 1.99€ all higher than that Ill go to blapkt instead ;)

Tapatalked from "The ICS Killer"
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Urokinase:
Thanx for this great kernel knzo. Keep up the good work and greets from germany. Buying your Phoenix App and it works without problems. 3Euro is not much money for the work you two guys do :)

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Entropy512:
Because the hardware in the I9100 limits charging current to one of 3 selections:

90 mA, 400 mA, 650 mA. The only thing the charging current control code does (and I still can't figure out WHY) is that according to some reports, it will allow changing from 400 to 650 and vice versa.

If you actually look at a dmesg, you find that charge current control in the I777 (and apparently the I9100 - I posted a YouTube link to someone running tests a while ago) is not handled by the MAX8997, but offloaded to a separate chip, a Maxim MAX8922. This chip is only capable of 90, 400, and 650 on our phones. If you've got a REALLY fine-tip soldering iron you can change the 650 by replacing a resistor, but that's it.

That's why GM removed the charging current control (or at least I thought he did) from SiyahKernel - it didn't actually DO anything.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] freemini:
650mA charge would mean a 2h30m from 0 to 100%. I don't seem to be to achieve that. And that 90 is just useless, it can't even charge it in deep sleep(maybe in airplane mode).
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] paaaulo:
Works fine now (1.26 + app 1.2). Thank you.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] apeiron6:
Same her, everything is working perfectly.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Entropy512:
650 minus battery inefficiencies minus CPU/screen power usage. (The most frustrating thing about every Samsung I've used - All CPU/screen/etc power usage counts against the charge current limit. So if you are draining 650 mA and the charge rate is 600, such as running Navigation on an Infuse, you'll slowly drain battery.)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] JmPTaz09:
1.2.6 running well on my i777 model, soft button issues are fixed. Seems to be running fast and smooth, can't comment on battery life yet. Would like to see bln support as I typically use it.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] :
Same here. Running the kernel under CheckROM Revo HD4 on i9100. One of the smoothest and fastest I've ever seen, but unfortunately no BLN possible even with fix through the app.

Tapatalked with GS2
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
Still at this?

I find it laughable you're trying to make this a witch hunt.

That's right, I couldn't apply those first patches because samsung source already had it. However, I could apply them to an old version of a conservative-based governor called Scary which already has the smartass suspend profile and served as lionheartx base. If you looked at my source, you'll see the: "inspired by scary governor by: scaryghoul". As for Arighi tweaks, check today's commit from simone (https://github.com/simone201/neak-kernel-sgs2/commit/f41134d577051b56100370e16c5832757ef0ade0), line 453 and line 467, that's what I did too based on what I saw in arighi's commit.

So boo-yah, two more failed attempts to discredit me and two more reasons for you to shut your piehole with false accusations and this pseudo-debunkery. If you want to criticise the patches or the code, be my guest, but you crossed a line by calling me a liar. So in reality, it's you digging your hole even deeper as an world-class dip****. It's been 24 hours and you keep this going. Ignore listed again and until you send me a PM saying you're sorry for calling me a liar, I won't feed your rabies attitude. On the opposite, next time you post and keep that tone, I will treat it as spam and report it. I have already given you more attention than you deserve.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] JmPTaz09:
Seems that both Gokhanmoral and Simone made changes to their conservative governor to be more like Knzo's as a results of this debacle.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] BrandoHD:
What evidence do you have to prove that the smoothness experienced in this kernel is a placebo? Have you used it?

I think you are going to far and over reaching here by calling users of this kernel idiots and comparing them to those who believed in the Bravia port fiasco, I have used this kernel along with a couple others and this is the of the smoothest kernels (out of the box) I have tried at the sacrifice of "screen on time" and I know that it is not a placebo, and FYI I did not for one moment believe in the Bravia port so your comparison is out of line for me and many other informed, non-dev users on XDA.

So while you can present supposed evidence as to the the origin of code and governers, don't call me an idiot that is caught in a placebo effect unless you can present some empirical evidence.....

Leave the users out of the flaming
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
firstly, conservative governor was not Knzo's.

secondly, my changes are there for a long time and it was not Knzo's commits anyway.

thirdly, knzo calls it lionheart and has already told that flashing lionheart.zip will not give the same results while it give exactly the same results.

we didn't change its name and simone's today's commit is ALL that Knzo has did to lionheart.

just that simple: 1-) get conservative governor from upstream 2-) lower sampling rate 3-) comment two lines which already gives more or less the same behavior even if you don't comment them.

I cannot believe that how he still defends himself ruthlessly and shamelessly.

It was not about lionheartx but lionheart, and he knows it, but still he is pretending like a moron and playing to the audience.

Entropy512 is absolutely right from the beginning to the end and yet knzo says that he has already given more attention than Entropy512 deserves?

in his changelog, I see that knzo gives more attention to him. and I remember that he was talking about his master thesis. I wonder if he will be able to get that degree without learning the ethics of citation?

I hope he will report this post as spam. I'll be glad if the mods kick me out of this forum as I was telling the truth and trying to correct his lies. oh yes, I am also calling him a liar.

---------- Post added at 02:24 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:21 AM ----------

I have used it. inspected the source. and also the initramfs.

it is just a cheap clone of other people's work. and there is no contribution.

the smoothness comes from the conservative governor and he calls that governor lionheart.

lionheart my ass :p

and I have a proof: download and try v2.6.10 and you'll have the same smoothness with conservative governor. or you can just flash lionheart.zip to get the SAME behavior which is in contrary to what knzo defends.

EDIT: there is contribution but the contribution is not for the community but for the pocket of knzo. there are some scripts and modifications to support the app he is selling. just wanted to make this clear, I don't call it contribution. other kernels can perform just the same if not better and all you have to do is to use SetCPU which is free for XDA members and choose conservative & lower the sampling rate & thresholds.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] JmPTaz09:
I know that Gokhanmoral, I didn't say it was his, I said you two made changes to your conservative governors to be more like his; check my post.

I'm not taking sides, just commenting. I've been using Siyah for the main part of my SGS II ownership; I like to test them all out and pick my favorite.

So thanks to you for Siyah, and thanks to Knzo for making AT&T version for me to test Phoenix. Thanks to Entropy for Hellraiser.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
I'm sorry that I misunderstood.

but I still stand by the points in my post anyway :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] BrandoHD:
I am doing this as we speak.....

It would be nice if some other users could also try, as I am not one for taking sides either
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] michal_alton:
To start with, I'm a n00b here and all this technical vocabulary doesn't tell me anything. In terms of performance or battery life I don't see much difference between this kernel or (lets say) Siyah which I was using for a long time before.

After reading all this discussion(?) between devs and devs it looks to me (n00b) that Entropy512 and company are throwing really serious evidence against Knze and all his got to say is "believe me, they are all liars and idiots" not backed up with anything.

And its not only about putting different things together and releasing it as original work, its about taking money for work he didn't developed (if it's true).

And yes, I paid for this app which I will really regret if it turns to be truth what Entropy is claiming. I don't mind paying for applications to developers, I have 200+ applications bought on my phone, its about taking money for something you didn't do.

Thats my 2, not important cents ;)

ps. Im not going to argue about what I think, I may be wrong but as for not this is how it looks to me.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] :
I actually tested both and tried gokhans conservative today and they feel and performance the same. All he did was use the governor as default. Nothing else. So outcome conservative is lionheart and lionheart is conservative. But anyway i still say this goes on bit to far Entropy you proved your point get Pulser to sort this out or do your flaming in private. And Knzo if you got nothing to hide prove your sources to mods to end this stupid childish flaming. And then they say about us noobs. Lol.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Ferdimage:
Went back to void..for some reason it feels and looks smoother on my launcher scrolling with live papers on

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
I already posted my "recipe" to reach to lionheart.

None of the steps including anything from siyah or neak or netarchy.

From day one, I never denied what it is (conservative based governor with patches and tweaks), claimed it was my own (I even corrected droidphile's definition on this regard) or even hid it (it's been available in my source all along). In fact, I released it for LG Black first, not even Galaxy S2 so you can see how ludicrous the accusations are.

Besides, I don't have to prove anything to anyone. I even find it funny they use words like "stolen" when in the kernel world (GPL license) there's no such thing. Either way, I followed my own path in the building of the governor and I already shared the "recipe". If the end product looks like someone else other's, it's not my problem but I still won't tolerate being called a liar. Simone's today commit to bring his governor closer to mine just proves my whole point.

As for the rest, this kernel has features that no other here has and most feel the difference. The application was made from scratch for LG Black too, then ported and improved for Galaxy S2. If you're going to doubt this, then they accomplished their task of discredit me and managed to kill down some competition that is innovating with app integration when they aren't. I seriously hope it's not the case because that'd mean this community is, on the words of franciscofranco, ****ty. On each post by Gokhanmoral, AndreiLux, Simone, Entropy, I see all the others immediately thanking it. This witch hunt gangbanging is ridiculous and I swear this is my last post on this subject, eveything from here on is noise and reported as spam.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
Here's a heads-up: BLN is broken in 1.26 (thanks to whoever submit the issue on the tracker) but the problem has been identified and fixed.

On the next version I'll also need some feedback regarding the battery and performance / snappiness as I'm going to give another run on jRCU (which was in void first version) instead of Tree + Fast NoHZ. The purpose of this RCU is to have one core focused on garbage collecting and leaving the other core always ready for more demanding tasks.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] snout:
@ Gokhan

Only 37, You just made me feel really old.:(

50 Very very soon for me - BUT I feel like an 18yr old - two would be good ! :D

Geez - what did we argue over back in the day on the net ? Ooh nothing there was no net , the only NET then was for Fish ! LOL, And a mobile phone that you had to strap on your back to carry it and it did not have a kernel - lol, it was so easy then.

Just a quick update Knzo - Im finding the lionheart Gov much smoother than the Wheatley Gov, The Wheatley Gov appears to give me some micro stutter flicking between screens - not all the time though.

As for battery i am not seeing much Difference between the two - but that could also have something to do with what i have disabled through Rom Toolbox.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
He said "smoothness experienced on this kernel", learn to read.

Unless you're reducing the smoothness of a kernel entirely up to the governor, in which case I'll laugh at you.

Why are you still here anyway? Grow up and turn off the flamethrower, even the users have asked you to for 24 hours.

In case you didn't know, I exchanged private messages with the ones who felt what I said before as unfair (including gokhanmoral) and everything was settled; if it weren't for you, this subject was long gone. But you had to come here with that childish attitude and now you managed to pull 10 pages of crap. Good job. Worse than that, only real madrid being stolen by the referee against barcelona.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] JmPTaz09:
Mine is running smooth on 1.26 with Hyperdroid V6 rom. Using default settings. Fast as well; only thing left to determine is battery life.