yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] itsme12345:
Mate i had come accross the same issue. So i had to clear the app which used to overclock. Mine is setcpu. Go to settings application and clear all settings of app u use. Reboot to recovery,clr cache. Wipe dalvikcache. Then reboot and go to app which u over clock and apply settings, and now power off the phone for a minute or 2, then poweron and try it should work, mine worked,not sure if there is other way. Tryit no harm.

Sent from my GT-I9003
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] juki_edan:
after i choose "reboot to CWM" in CWM app, i can't boot to normal mode if i choose turn off in CWM recovery... i tried to turn on my phone, and my phone go back to CWM recovery...
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] supergaijin:
you're reporting two different things: "after i choose "reboot to CWM" in CWM app, i can't boot to normal mode if i choose turn off in CWM recovery" and "i tried to turn on my phone, and my phone go back to CWM recovery..."

you can boot to "normal mode" without issues by selecting "reboot phone now". your complaint is regarding "choosing to turn the phone off from recovery"

whether or not it's "normal", that's the way it's been for quite a while at least. I deal with it by simply not selecting to turn it off, unless I'm trying to eject the sd card to add a file to the sd and then use it in cwm without fully booting the phone. in that case, since it shts off completely for a couple seconds, it's more than enough time to eject the card before it reenters cwm ;)
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] juki_edan:
yep it's true...

i tried to choose turn off phone twice, and then finally i choose "reboot"... then go to normal boot...

sorry, i just don't know about this rule in CWM recovery :)
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Napstar:
Thanx for pointing out. Never used that option as explained by supergaijin. :p

It will be corrected in next release
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] itsme12345:
Napstar, wating for full working sd-ext and power-off fix, Napstar what could be reason for going wifi in error state, i had this issue only once.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] juki_edan:
thanks before guys :)

finally i goes back to v8 fix... and everything going normal like before (before i used latest v9 #3009) :D hopefully next release will be better, i realy appreciate all of your works guys...
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vishal24387:
In vurrut v6 version kernel is underclocked to 120 mhz frequency. Can we have that in UC kernel???
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] DooMLoRD:
dude update the thread title
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] seizmos:
@vishal

XXKPQ is european rom, all mods , themes and kernels based on this rom, better for all to stay on this rom br'o.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vishal24387:
oh yeah...no problem for me bro :)
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] crk1995:
What does the numbers after the Kernal name (i.e. 1009, 2009, 3009) refers to?

Thanks in advance?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] amit864:
These are test kernels where the difference is how each is overclocked. Read OP to see details for each kernel.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] dedy3092:
Whether v09 Can using in miui rom???
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] alex88510:
@Doomlord

@Napstar

as i know previous version of v9 revert cf-root to older version.

is the latest version change back to the never version?

the GUI look kinda pretty, will test it later and report if there is any issue.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] itsme12345:
Napstar when is the next release. hopfull 1.35 gh OC and 120UC will be added too along with new theame background to touch recovery & fixed sd-ext, also one more good feature found in vurrut kernel, currently i am on v7 for temporary till you release nxt one, i am using 1.35gh and 120UC it has a good vibrat function when we click on tabs so can we have the same in next release in recovery. so that it will add value to touch theame. wating for the best.....
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] longfeng:
I believe 1.3GHz maybe the most stable speed we have currently. Going further is possible but may cause unexpected overheat or random reboot or FC issues in some phones with some CPUs.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] itsme12345:
I have been on vurrut kernel v7 with 1350mhz OC and 120mhz UC, and with my self modified ddkp3, i amd on it more than 48 hrs, i did not had any FC's nor i faced over heat, also battery seems to be pretty good as equvilent to UCv9 @1300mz. Had only once issue with cracked game which could not download the required data from its base site and had to remove battery and uninstalled the game, rest games work very smooth, battery is good, wifi no issues, GPS binds in less than minute in house. so lets have UC next release with same freq as vurrut ker. so that who ever needs they will clock to 1300 and rest who needs can clock to 1350. as vurrut ker can be set at freq as required. SCrn shot attached, i am pretty happy with both the Kernels, only lacks in vurrut Kernel is its not fine tuned as UCv9 and the Recovery menu lacks the touch graphical feel. Around 109 apps having more free memory.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] akashsgpgi:
i tried the latest v9 1.3ghz and my phone works fine for a few minutes then hang and i have to take out the battery

but 1.3 ghz works fine on vurrut v7

i dont find the use of underclock as it requires much time to test and not much performance benefit

the new full touch recovery is very cool:D
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vishal24387:
@ Doomlord & napster

Its very minor issue but still I want to mention that when we go into recovery & when we choose any option then always we see like this

no

no

no

no

no

no

yes

no

no

I mean to say its irritating to see un-necessary so many no option. Plz if possible remove it in next version.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] itsme12345:
No's is like saftey for us in recovery, if there is no No then if some one mistakenly presss Yes when you are at format/wipe @ data or factory reset then you are gone. so that is where these No's are helpfull.... Yes its irratating but we need less No's...

There is no response from Napstar since one day may be he is Busy in doing some thing Big to give us...
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] DooMLoRD:
I already have it removed from my recovery for ARC/PLAY
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] mznk:
Maybe late for bug reporting, but here are a few things I have noticed in latest UCv9-1009:

1. The Root is always mounted as R/W instead of R/O. (Don't know if it's a feature or a bug)

2. Advanced Restore option is missing in the latest release.

3. Recovery makes a external_sd folder in external sd card. (Again don't know if it's a feature)

Lastly, Thanks for the continuous work and awesome kernel!
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] alex88510:
flashed v09 2009 since yesterday.

everything is good, the touch screen recovery is good, no problem.

but it look like my phone can't run at 1.25ghz for a long time.

if i run some games which requires the processor to constantly run at max speed, it will randomly reboot and/or the screen kinda funny.

apart from that, it is all good.

thanks.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] jamsori:
Looks like you got unlucky and got a poor overclocking CPU. :(

I've (finally!) gotten the time to flash to XXKPQ (from XXKPM) and i flashed V9 on my phone. Runs really nicely with the interactiveX scheduler. I haven't overclocked the CPU (yet?) but it runs really nicely. :)

Thanks!
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] alex88510:
ya, I wonder why I always bad luck...

desktop processor also the same, bad overclock potential.

I think I will stick at 1.2Ghz max.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] unichem:
im having a wifi error with this UC-KERNEL-v09 (3009) version 2009 ok but some games crash 1009 work like charm but still looking for bugs..
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Sabang:
Hi!

I'm using UC Kernel 3009 with full touch recovery. And I can't find WIPE DATA item in WIPE menu. Is this a feature or bug?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] unichem:
hmm...factory data missing
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] juki_edan:
hello DooM, how are you??! :D
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] DooMLoRD:
I am fine just busy with work....

Don't fill dev thread with things like this...
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] itsme12345:
Why there is silence and no word from Napstar on the Kernel update.. when is the next release.

Listed things wating for....

1) full work external /sd-ext

2) Good Looks for the touch recovery with vibrate feel

3)Removal of too much NO No No Nossss

4) 1350 mz if not scalable setting 1350-1300-1250-1200-*-*-*200-120-deepsleep

5) Partition table fix and convertion of ext2-ext3-ext4

6) Power off toggle fix as it boots to recovery when we use power-off...

Pls add any other things along with these....
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] bscraze:
Why do people demand so much things? Relax, politely suggest and as suggested by doomlord, he's busy with work, probably napstar too. Please do not post such things again. They're doing it for free, they're not obliged to do everything you expect and demand from them...

Cheers:)

Sent from my GT-i9003 powered by MIUI:D
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Napstar:
Will certainly look into your wish list.

Thanx!

And yes I am a bit busy with my work. ;)

Hopefully I will start working our device this week.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] seizmos:
New rom is released , xxkpu......doomlord/napstar can u make kernel for this new rom.

TT by galaxy SCL
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vishal24387:
this kernel will definitely work on xxkpu also. This kernel based on Amit's universal cf root. So it will work on every GB firmwares.

---------- Post added at 11:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:42 PM ----------

this kernel will definitely work on xxkpu also. This kernel based on Amit's universal cf root. So it will work on every GB firmwares...
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] neutronz:
XXKPU + uc-kernel v9 3009 = working :D
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] ss03101991:
UC & OC

hi. loved the v9 with optional OC.

had a little idea. i am sure u are already considering. can we make a kernel with optional OC and underclocking in one? i have seen similar ones on the I9000. just an idea. keep up the great work!
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] itsme12345:
R u the Kernel developer, then what is pain in you, i have not requested you.. i have posted because i requested all those in pecies 2 wks back, and was just trying to make the post awaken... i know what to aks and when tooo. dont finger in other things which are not yourss....
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] hpog:
deleted. my apologies.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] itsme12345:
sorry i cant help ppl who cant understand the post i posted....
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] prince_venom:
LOL.... Hes Demanding Things Here Like He Had Paid for this Kernel
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Napstar:
Please stop all this stuff. Don't fill this thread with such crap.

P.S. If anyone don't like or feel offended by any of the post here, then please send a p.m. to respective person instead of replying back in this thread. Please maintain a healthy environment.

Thanx
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vishal24387:
Just ignore such posts. Anyway I want to ask u little out of the box question. As u know that our GB roms are facing push notification problem, can u please confirm that weather this problem is related to kernel or related to modem or something else that we don't know??? If its a kernel issue then plz give it as priority to solve this bug. Many users are really frustrated due to bug. Plz ignore if its not related to topic. Thank u.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] ggclanlord:
Why do you think its out-of-box? Its been asked earlier and its nothing new.

No offence/aggression meant. Just mean to say, its not out-of-the-box.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vishal24387:
My intention behind saying out of the box is that if the push notification is not related to kernel then it would be out of the box question to be asked in UC kernel thread :) Anyway I am looking forward for UC team's response.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] ggclanlord:
Well, here's what Concise English Oxford Dictionary has to say on this

So what you actually meant must be "off-topic".

Anyway, apologies @UC team for such ot posts.

This ends here.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] DooMLoRD:
Oh god... Please take this debate out of here and continue it via p.m....
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vishal24387:
LOLLLL....
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] alex88510:
Here is some opinion of mine regarding the touch screen recovery.

Under flash zip via cwm, on the moment to confirm the flash(the screen with many NONONONOsss), the confirm button is too small and still need to show the full file name, end up all ".....".

My opinion is, why don't make it just showing "YES" but make the title in the top middle larger and with full file name?

This way we will be able to see it more clearly.

Hope you understand what I mean.

Thanks.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] ggclanlord:
Yea, but the nos are there so that one doesn't click it accidentally.

And anyway according to a post by UC sometime back, its already been removed.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] longfeng:
for usd10k, i am sure they can fulfill your needs. when can you transfer the money?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] alex88510:
what I means is, the "no" button can keep(or reduce) but the "yes" button can be set to a larger button or showing "YES" instead of the whole file name...

longer file name shown in a small button only result in many "...." which cannot clearly seen.

And the top middle title can be larger so that it will be easier to read.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] bscraze:
To tell the truth, there really is no point in removing the nos as we have touch recovery alrdy, no need to spam the volume up or down button to reach the yes option ;)

Cheers:)

Sent from my GT-i9003 powered by MIUI:D
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] deepanshu sharma:
sometimes the NO button is necessary since most of the times when you press the home key to select,it somehow 'double selects' and selects the next available option on its own.there is obviously no point of too many no buttons but 2-3 wont do any harm.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vishal24387:
@ doomlord & napster

I was just thinking about flashing a kernel without pc. For that we have already option of mobile odin. But other than that we dont have any other option. So I want to ask you that is there any way by which we can flash a kernel through recovery mode like how we flash flashable zip files????
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] bscraze:
Yes its possible. I've flashed kernels for my g3 thru recovery. Vurrut has also done that with his v3 kernel for cm7/miui

Edit: I know the question was for doomlord and napstar, I'm just shedding a little light :p

Cheers:)

Sent from my GT-i9003 powered by MIUI:D
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] DooMLoRD:
There is a way but easier to use MobileODIN
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vishal24387:
Actually whenever I try vurrut kernel just for a change then my phone always stuck at samsung logo. But after that if suppose I want to flash again UC kernel to get phone in working condition but as my phone stuck at samsung logo so can't flash any other kernel.

But if we have option to flash kernel in recovery mode then it will become like another option to mobile odin :)
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] DooMLoRD:
If ur phone is stuck at Samsung logo then ur only option is ODIN
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] joelmonty:
@doom and nap , I have noticed color banding on screen especially on widgets while home screen transitions , on hd2 forums they fixed this issue, it was some kernel problem from the video driver, can you fix this issue , I have noticed this same problem in miui and cm7.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Napstar:
Have you tried booting into recovery when you are stuck at boot. Mostly, it will not even boot recovery because for our device we have kernel for both device and recovery in same boot.img file and they are flashed on single partition. So if anyone of them is not working, it is equivalent of saying that none of them are booting.

So there wont be any point to recover stuck device using recovery, Odin using PC is the only option for now.

Please provide complete information:

Kernel version,

ROM,

which launcher?

I have not faced such problems, I am on UC kernel 1009, stock XXKPQ, GO launcher.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vishal24387:
luckily i could still go into recovery mode when my phone stuck at samsung logo after flashing vurrut kernel. Anyway can u plz add underclocking 120 mhz bin in next version like in vurrut kernel? People reported that phone doesnt go in SOD state even at 120 mhz frequency which is really good for better battery life.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] itsme12345:
Only vishal has faced issue with vurrut ker, mine never had any issue with vurrut kernel. it is smooth and stable.. now a week old.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vishal24387:
ya...unfortunately i am facing problem with vurrut kernel :( But i observed that 2-3 members have reported same problem like me. We can discuss this in vurrut kernel thread. Its going off topic. Sorry.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] joelmonty:
Sorry for not providing information

Kernel version-UC V9 1009,

Stock DDKP3,I have got this same prob in other stock rom also

Go Launcher,i have tested this in all launchers,adw,launcher pro,TW3 this issue is there but its not there in TW4

have faced this in all ROMs that i have used but this isn't a big problem ,since it only come while Home screen transition's,here's an image
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] XDA_Bam:
I can confirm this bug. It happened to me with the Smooth Calendar widget since installing the first GB ROM. I never had this problem on Froyo.

EDIT: But it didn't only occur on screen changes. There always was heavy banding. Tested on stock ROM and first BCK releases.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] loSconosciuto:
This happens because the launcher is using 16bit transparency instead of 32bit. Usually 16bit offers more performance, but it's not as good looking as 32bit.

Some launchers offers you the possibility to choose between 32bit and 16bit (GO Launcher EX for example), CyanogenMod allows you to change this from the CyanogenMod settings.

You can also enable 32bit transparency in TouchWiz, I did it once, but I can't remember the result and which apk I modded to do that.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] joelmonty:
Oh thanks for that important info,I enabled high quality drawing option on ,the banding is gone but its very slow.how is the performance on touch wiz,with that mod?

I installed smooth calender widget im not getting that much banding ,even in low quality.

@napster-I have noticed one more bug ,if i awake the phone from stand by the phone is lagish,but if i swing or play around with the home screen's the lag just goes away,if i put a pattern lock then phone doesnt become lagish,i guessing because of using the touch screen intensivly at the start the lagg does not come.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] loSconosciuto:
As I said I can't remember, I'm not using TouchWiz anymore and at the moment I'm using CyanogenMod, so...

The lags you have are probably due to the slow CPU scaling, it's not a bug. Try a different governor (if you don't know what is it, do a quick search).
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] joelmonty:
I've tried all governs but the initial lag is always there even in the performance governor, but your right the lag is very similar to the lag I get when I kick the phone to 300,Not sure if I'm only having this issue
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] DooMLoRD:
can someone upload XXKPU stock kernel here? normalboot.img
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vishal24387:
@ doomlord

xda bam has successfully removed mail sync bug. Now phone can notify new mail even in deep sleep mode. I have tested his kernel. He used some froyo code in kernel. Can u plz include it in ur next version...?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] DooMLoRD:
thats great news!

honestly we never faced this issue on our development device...

but anyways i will contact XDA_Bam and ask him for the required patch...

though currently Napstar has the device with him so he can update the kernel with it & test it out...
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] jamsori:
Is this what you need?

http://www.mediafire.com/?eibh78yl75ayug3
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vishal24387:
In galaxy s forum developers have developed 5th version of kernel included usb otg which now support mouse & keyboard (but still need power source). I saw ur github account. I saw that u had tried for usb otg nearly a month ago. Are u not going to try it to patch it in our kernel?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] DooMLoRD:
vishal u have to understand a few things...

Galaxy S & Galaxy SL ARE NOT THE SAME, they are based on different platforms, Galaxy S is Samsung hummingbird platform & Galaxy SL is TI OMAP platform

so the patches which work for Galaxy S will not work on SL

i am very busy with personal work, so i dont have much time to work on this kernel

Napstar has the device with him but he too is busy with his work

we know that u want more features and its not that we are not trying... we try our best to get amazing new features/fun stuff to this device, as i am sure most of you would have appreciate that we have done a lot for this device... its not just this kernel, we also support other devs of this device and keep helping them when they need help... but try to understand that we have our own lives and android development is done just for fun in our spare time... it is extremely annoying to see users DEMAND stuff... i dont want to start another stupid debate but please try to understand... we are looking into it, when we find something useful to add & it works then we will update the kernel with it...

thanks, Napstar will check it and see if there are any relevant updates in ramdisk for XXKPU compatibility...
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vishal24387:
oh u misunderstood me :) Actually in galaxy s forum developer has said that usb otg patch is quite universal for samsung & not depends upon specific device. Thats why I asked u casually. My intention was not to demand something to u. And of course I understand that how much u are busy with so many devices & some personal stuffs :) So take ur time buddy. We all are here always to test ur precious work.

Thank you
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] jamsori:
Glad i could help :)
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] supertommy82:
i m using this kernel (2009 max 1.2 ghz version) from some month and i m experiencing a strange problem... sometimes i have data loss problem about CALL LOGS that disappear totally from phone... it happened that SMS PROGRM crashed also and phone reboot was required to work again... can this issue related to kernel mod? Or is other stuff??

(i have ext4 mod also)

Cant understand how to have a stable phone...
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] DooMLoRD:
it would be great if u can give details of ur current setup, along with screenshot from "About Phone"
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] khandelwalsiddharth:
Stuck at samsung logo when flashing to XXKPQ stock KERNEL !!! HELP!!!
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vineet_n:
Works perfect on my device..ty
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] RonnYap:
Work perfect on my device?????User will :confused::confused::confused:

Next time when posting thread, give more detail..

Which stock rom? Ext4? Stock rom or custom rom?

If all user post like that, story will never end..
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] supertommy82:
i have just few programs installed and some widget nothing special

wich info can i give you to find out problem?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] shriom_manerker:
ron he said its working properly :P lol chill man ! and its working fine on my device too :) waiting for new version :)
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Nikscas:
Doomlord request,you can do 1200 5th opp and 1350/1400 6th opp thanks
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] DooMLoRD:
Napstar has device with him... right now he is busy with personal work... he will post updates when they are ready ;)

FYI: me & Napstar are both students, so we have to concentrate on our personal work schedule too... XDA development we do in our free time but unfortunately both of us are currently caught up in work...
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] slowadi:
I use'd v3009 ... but I had problems with WIFI:confused:... the problem was solved ... Thanks in advance
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] ggclanlord:
I know you both busy and stuff

But just a recommendation,

Please consider including. XDA_Bam's kernel's push notification fix patch in your next update.