yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] mbutandola:
Right. You've known this for quite some time it appears. Why didn't you raise the alarm at the time as your main concern is the users that are being fooled.

Knzo selling an app now doesn't change the fact that what is true now was true at the time. Still, I didn't see such determination. And none of the devs that came flaming here reacted at the time either.

Didn't see such flaming either when some dev came up with a bravia port.

Didn't see any of this when Hyperdroid team got their work kanged.

Basically you're saying that the reason for your committed intervention lies in one claim made by knzo? What about the credits on the first post? Is it just a strategy to fool everyone? And when some other dev makes comparisons only to promote their own kernel (saying their is lighter or better, will have a better app ect) there is no sense of rivalry?

It's just you guys defending us noobs and opening up our blind eyes? :)

You're very good at what you do. But regarding this matter I think you could have dealt with it with more subtility.

Envoyé depuis mon GT-I9100 avec Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] mbutandola:
Did they? Watched the game and don't think so. When you lose that many times to a team you just need to acknowledge that they are just better than you. Whatever the referee they end up having their asses kicked :D.

Just my 2 cents lol ah ah ah.

Envoyé depuis mon GT-I9100 avec Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] AndreiLux:
You missed a fire-storm of a discussion then. I already mentioned it a few posts ago, it ended up getting deleted by a moderator. The Bravia fiasco also ended up badly towards the credibility of the dev (Why do you think DarkKnight also stopped being updated?), as did the flaming about the Hyperdroid story. Take off the reality-distortion glasses.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] mbutandola:
Reality distortion? Ah ah ah. Very good. Fortunately I don't compile kernels. I would have been the next target. :).

You are talking about the DK kernel not being updated and the bravia but I didn't see that many devs getting at him the same way. If they did, it was done mostly in private. I've got no interest here. Just saying that you guys could have done things differently. Anyway keep on the flaming if you want. Got better things to do. First thing is to get myself some new glasses ;).

Take care.

Envoyé depuis mon GT-I9100 avec Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] blunted09:
So much hate and *****ing on these forums lately regardless of reason. can this be handled through pm perhaps rather than filling up a pretty good kernel thread?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] krinyo75:
Mising BLn support

hi

Nice kernel but you forgot BLN support from v1.26 :(
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Ferdimage:
Yeah had to revert to previous version too...

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] TecQuality:
just a little Q: Mobile Odin is supported?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] mbutandola:
I think he says some pages back that it's been fixed on next version. :)

Envoyé depuis mon GT-I9100 avec Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] JayJ-1974:
I've been using Mobile Odin, just download the .tar instead of the .zip.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Swyped from a distant star, the other side of the Galaxy on my GT-I9100 powered by V3TR3MA ROM using Tapatalk ©
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] zikarus:
Battery consumption needs some tweaking: encountered a 29% loss in 7 hours standby that night (data on, aftr and schedmc activated; sio lion)

GT 9100 tapatalking
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] TecQuality:
superb, another Q: is there a bootanimation with the kernel's logo?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] kimitza:
Wow..old habbits coming back...this time i'm with knzo.i bought his app and i dont regret it.in fact,knzo and jkay are the only reasons i come here.xda is not what it used to be.only a few real devs are here,the rest are gone because of the haters.all do respect for hardcore,supercurio,knzo,jkay and gochan.here on xda the so called devs pay more attention on hating/flaming than developing.same happened with damian.he was banned because some rules even the one imposing them dont follow and respect. I'm sick of it.

Knzo this is an official invite to come on damian's place. There is no quality debate there. On damian's place was releases the first odex custom rom for sgs,then it came a fashion here and guess what,many claimed they were the first. Now,there is a new way of cooking roms for sgs1.it will take only a few hrs to create a new rom instead of days/weeks.i bet my 2 cents soon there will be a "dev" here claimimg he invented it.

now, for sgs 2 we need a great kernel. We already have a great rom and the work for porting the new way to cook roms for s2. In fact it's something it can be inserted in the kernel. Just take a look.with damian working for sgs and soon note and you on sgs2...it will be just wow..

Anyway,i think its my last visit here. I will follow the updates on phoenix site and thats it.

Ps,i'm not a coder/compiler,but the quality of the work here is just low. Only a few trully respect this. I just cant beleive how some so called devs release their work labeled as final.on damian's place it would be at most a beta.i made some comparisons,a beta/rc release on damian's has less bugs/issues than a "final" release here. So i guess i'll stick with the quality this time. You should too.

Good bye
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] 5152:
@knzo

It would be nice if your "expensive" Phoenix Tweaks might work with other kernels too.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] 13pointseven:
£2.50....expensive?? I'm a student mate, absolutely skint at minute and even I can see that this is cheap. Nobody forcing you to buy it, its not essential to have this app just makes quick changes a little easier. Nothing stopping you making manual changes like on every other kernel?

It would be nice to see compatibility with other kernels, somehow I cant see that happening :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
I know BLN isn't working in 1.26, it'll be fixed in next version.

I will discuss it with aprold but that depends more on the other devs than me, they need to support it on initramfs. Besides, I don't think they want to. If they do, they can always talk to me.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] snout:
:D lmao - needs a whole lotta lovin for that to happen - at the moment anyway ;)

made me laugh though. nice one.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] SPACE ALIEN:
Agree with this!
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] 5152:
Thank you!

If you read what is written, not what you would like to see ...
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
why would a kernel developer want to edit initramfs to support an app for such echoing and reading operations?

the app can support installing other kernels without the help of other developers.

but that would be pointless to promote other kernels, right? :p

we already have setcpu and voltagecontrol app and the latter already supports a lot of kernel dependent (my kernel and some other generic patches for sgs2) features and they can do that without my initramfs support.

knzo can support other kernels if he wants.

xan did it for my kernel and he did it without any of my help.

but it would be pointless for knzo to do it because those modules that you load with that tweaking app is already loaded in other kernels and from the screenshots I can only tell that there is not much other useful options that the app offers. some of them are dangerous to set and some of them are just pointless to unset. this is my humble opinion.

oh, OTA is useful, very useful.

and that part I will implement and I think I will support other kernels as I am not targeting any audience or customers.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
I open myself to the idea of making the app support other kernels and you take the subject so you can diss it?

I may be wrong but that sounded like a provocation. I asked for interested developers to talk to me, not uninterested developers to make a post with their biased opinion.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
sorry for making my thoughts about this public and explaining the irrelevance of the request by answering a user's post :)

I was explaining the reasons and if you oppose them I'd like to hear.

except for that, I don't care about your thoughts about me provoking the audience.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
I'm not feeding another flamewar sorry. I didn't expect this from you.

I've been in many communities and this is the first time I'm facing some pretty ****ty and childish developers who try to kill instead of cooperate (even franciscofranco was disgusted when I tell him what happened here). Even after all this crap for the last posts and accusations, I'm willing to support the kernels of those who tried to discredit me and you reply like that which was totally uncalled for. I seem to value more the opinions of users than you do - if there's some request, I tend and listen to it, I don't discard them right away for my pride.

This chat with you ends here. I stick to my words, interested developers can

talk to me

.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
again you are playing poor to the audience :)

I replied to a post and the content was relevant both with your post and the user's request.

if you cannot live with other's thoughts it's your problem mate.

I have nothing to talk to you now as it is you that has to talk to me if you are interested in supporting my kernel. after all, you are the one selling it.

don't create a false judgement of users that I am not interested to be supported by your excellent app.

'nuff said.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] chareos12:
Hi,

what do you think about this tweak ?

I enabled it via init.d script, my GTalk client disconnects way less frequently, and market fires up really fast.

Perhaps a version less extreme (heartbeat every 5 minutes sounds fine) could make its way in Phoenix scripts ?

Best regards
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Urokinase:
Where or what is Damians´s Place ? :o
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
@gm - if you are interested then I got it wrong and I'll get back at you soon by pm.

@chareos - I will explore that when I get home.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
thank you :)

If you need I will tell you the details of the device files via pm so that you can support setting them both while running and on boot.

I never hesitate to answer the questions that I know the answer of.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
As soon as the kernel check interface is done I'll reach you. You'll need a web host for the ota upgrade and to execute a specific init script but this you already know.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
I wont need that part as I have already started working on it. Luca's sources are great for that purpose. But it will be good to have a paid and commercially supported option. Thank you.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] gnkgr:
Real wonderful kernel.... but we need support for BLN asap.....

Thank's knzo.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
Let me get back from the university and I'll build 1.27 with fixed bln.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] eric-filth:
@gm

why you dont continue developing you kernel and will go write the answers about your kernel in you thread?

@€2.50

half the people said is expensive the app smells cocaine almost every day.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] vanahaim:
Just flash the newest 1.27 via app and.. can not boot up, stuck at GALAXY SII logo :( What´s wrong @knzo ?

(I think something like this I have had with one of latest version of NEAK kernel..)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
are you trying to silence me? how dare?

I have all the rights of all other users in XDA Forums and nobody but only mods can tell me something like that.

if you have problem with my posts you can always add me to your ignore list.

in this way, you won't spend your and my time to discuss on such idiocity.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
1.27 pushed.

Edit: /facpalm, I forgot again to change to 1.27 on about. Repushing in 20 minutes.

I just updated fine via app...
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] rizcom:
Just flash the newest 1.27 via app and.. can not boot up, stuck at GALAXY SII logo What´s wrong?

(I think something like this I have had with Neak kernel..)

try wiping cache and dalvik cache
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] vanahaim:
Reflash 1.24 via ODIN a tried 1.27 via app again - but the same situation - stuck at logo.. Can it be bootloader (xxlp6) or something other depended? :(
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] meniak:
At last... I sure hope this war is finally over and dev' ers start working together (or separate) towards the same goal: having fun while dev'ing and as an end-result delivering something beautiful. Knzo, I'm running your kernel atm and so far I quite like the smoothness of it. Used Siyah before and liked battery life. Guess I'll stick with Phoenix for daily use and switching to Siyah when summer comes, festivals begin and I need battery-life over performance. Nice to have options. Really really hope the war is over, axes get burried and everyone continues where they left off.

For me, it's probably gonna be investigating Android some more as this is my third week on the OS. Coming from a HTC Touch HD with Windows Mobile 6.5 there's a whole new exciting world opening here!!! :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] vanahaim:
I had the same idea, but cannot get into recovery.. Thanks anyway..
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
That's awkward to say the least.

I only changed things in the kernel this time, I didn't touch initramfs. If it boots for me, it should boot for you too.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] rizcom:
take the battery out for a few secs then back in , try holding the vol up home button and the power button (i use a usb jig)for this

or try a reflash with odin vol down (download mode)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
As you can see, fine here:

manuel@dreamcast:~$ adb shell uname -a

Linux localhost 2.6.35.7-Phoenix-v1.27-int+ #143 SMP PREEMPT Thu Jan 26 12:05:36 WET 2012 armv7l GNU/Linux
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] vanahaim:
Don´t know.. Boot up to the first screen, reboot and again.. Only download mode is available, recovery no way :(

Older Phoenix version is ok, Siyah too..
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Pfeffernuss:
Same here, updated using the app, works just fine...
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] gnkgr:
The same here .....

All work fine ....

Thank's knzo
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
Later today I'll paste here a link for instructions on how other devs can add support on their kernels for phoenix tweaks.

They'll be the ones choosing the active options/features, including OTA upgrader. Everything on the app will be at their disposal.

I honestly have no idea. All the changes I did are kernel-level, doesn't make sense not booting for just one guy. Try flashing the .tar via odin.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] vanahaim:
Wow.. So I tried to flash the 1.27 via Odin and it works! Thanks knzo..!

But when I tried to reproduce the error - downgrade via Odin to 1.26 and flash the 1.27 version via app, the boot stuck is there again.. (But the Odin way works, so now is all ok. Before this I was upgrading from 1.24/25/26 through app without problem.)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] panteleimonov:
why the thread its not updated or you have some more work around the kernel?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
I forgot. Jesus, you guys don't play around. I'm a short leash here.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] panteleimonov:
problem here!! after flash 1.27 via Odin the reboots over and over again..
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
Did you download int version?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] nedooo:
Any plan on changing display drivers for more brightness and color balance, it seems that Samsung original display driver settings with a bit tweaked sharpness and voodoo support is a winner.

Just a suggestion.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] varenathan:
Hi knzo,

Just flashed v1.27 over v1.24 through Phoenix Recovery. It works just fine. Oo yeah, it supports boot animation :) BLN, haven't tried as no one hasn't called me or sent me an sms.

Battery performance, when it comes into deep sleep it's very good, tested 11 hours only 7% drained. When it comes with WiFi, tested 8 hours, drained 22%. It seemed something waked phone as i saw in betterbatterystats.

Now testting it with 1.27. Thanks again knzo! I would like to donate as i know you're a developer but also a student.. but i still can't buy Phoenix Tweaks.

cheers!
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] panteleimonov:
ofcourse mate.:confused:
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Kaboosey:
Anyone got issues on boot animation?

Since 1.26, everytime I reboot my phone, the boot animation doesn't seem to sync correctly.

After the boot logo, it will only display blank screen (but with the back and menu button lights on) for few seconds (maybe around 5-10 seconds). The boot animation sound is also played during this blank screen.

Only after few seconds again, the boot animation is played.

Not a problem for me though, just curious whether others have this problem and maybe have a fix with it.

1.27 runs fine and smooth for ME :)

Thanks knzo! You deserved my $ for Phoenix Tweaks and now that you're going to add support for other kernels, that will be AWESOME!
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] iamsmallpang:
hi,

can you make phoenix kernel compatible with "chainfire "CWM
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] pepe2909:
+1 same request
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] j3di:
+knzo Thanks for your kernel work, much appreciated!

Bought the app too :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] brack11:
Is application available only on market?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Igor 3:
+1...........
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] varenathan:
Mine is fine. I always use kernel cleaning script before flashing a kernel (updated or new kernel). Hopefully, it might help you otherwise sorry, i can't help you. Knzo might know the solution or others might know it.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] zaclee:
im having the same issue on the bootanimation also exactly like u
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Urokinase:
When i will update kernel OTA with Phoenix App it shows me MD5 checksum mismatch.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] apeiron6:
I noticed that the battery life with Phoenix kernel is poor. I got excellent battery life with void.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Kaboosey:
Thanks for your input, but I have used kernel cleaning script just now but the problem is still there. :( It's fine, I'll just wait for knzo. Thanks!

---------- Post added at 11:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:08 PM ----------

Well, just wait for knzo's input regarding it. :)

So far, I have tried:

- flash a flashable zip of stock boot animation

- flash kernel cleaning script and then reflash the kernel

It doesn't fix it.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
I hate github but here it is:

https://github.com/knzo/phoenix-tweaks-support

All the information needed for other developers to add support to Phoenix tweaks is there. The interface is still in the works but we hope to start testing it today or tomorrow.

I'll add this to the OP too.

P.S. I saw many requests for the display driver changes. I will look into that later.

I have it too, it seems to be late.

I think this is due to jRCU. I activated it again now (was in void alpha) to give it another go. Let's see the feedback from battery/performance on v1.27. If it's positive (including my perception), I may have to sacrifice a few seconds delay on the boot animation for a better experience.

Standby or under heavy usage?

Actually I've been reading reports with dispersed results. Some get awesome battery, some others don't. Personally, my standby battery is quite good but I'm careful with background processes draining or wakelocks. However, also personally, the battery consumption under heavy usage isn't still where I want it (aprold on the other hand is getting awesome results). This battery consumption under heavy usage has been there since void alpha so I'd need to retrace my steps a long way back to find what modification I might have made that isn't as battery-friendly as I'd like. But on the other hand, I'm kinda lazy since ICS sources (3.0 kernel) should be coming out really soon and it'll mean starting over either way.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] apeiron6:
Standby
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Kaboosey:
Sure thing, not a problem for me though since it's just on bootanimation which you wouldn't be seeing all the time on your phone, Lol.

But hey, it's better to report if there's something wrong so you could actually look into it for the next release, IF there is.

Thank you! :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
My standby battery is nice.

Make sure to monitor the processes and what not with applications such as BetterBatteryStats and PowerTutor.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] noke955:
+1

what I tried already:

- clear data from app

- deinstall app and install new from market

Problem appeared with all new kernels, 1.25 / 1.26 / 1.27

edit: seems to be a "german+vodafone" problem...
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] snout:
Just love this OTA Update feature..:D

That is worth the APP Cost on its own.

Rolls out of bed - not a PC in site 1.27 in - up and running.

GREAT WORK MY FRIEND..
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
Uploaded it to the issue tracker:

http://code.google.com/p/phoenix-kernel/issues/list

Will look into it later.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] JmPTaz09:
I'm glad to see Gokhanmoral here, the more good developers we have sharing knowledge, the better kernels us users have to play with :-) as long as they're not arguing, lol

p.s. just flashed 1.27, seems good so far, will see how it goes! BLN is working.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Jibreil:
Bought the Phoenix Tweaks app yesterday. Can someone suggest the best settings in it? I need good performance but better battery saving.

Thanks in advance.

@knzo: Please can you include the RedPill Recovery in your future releases
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
Never heard of it; what's so special about it? Sell it to me.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] TheFaixy:
boot time long first black screen then the boot animation but sync with sound
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Kaboosey:
As stated by knzo in his previous post, he will look into it but for now, he needs feedback on 1.27 regarding performance etc first.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] droidphile:
It's a modded recovery from hyperdroid team.

Main attraction being the ability to mount internal and external sdcards.

Siyah 2.6.11 released today has this cwm.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
Alright, one more thing for me to look into.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] JJEgan:
Moved from kernel xx to 1.25 gives 25% sleep battery drain with no wakelocks and very high Android OS exactly the same with 1.26.

Will test 1,27 tonight .

jje
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] droidphile:
You may want to contact af974 for the same.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] sydknee:
Early signs are improved performance compared to siyah 2.6.11. Will give it a go for a few days for battery.