yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
No, I mean... on the phone, not screenshot. Try it.

I swear I can see it change on the browser preview below. Look at the whites and blues.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] JmPTaz09:
Yes, it's a subtle but noticeable difference. Native removes some of the sharpening, etc., that come with stock.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] ka2uki:
no..i said when use the phone connect PC transfer some files to the pnone...when is done unmount the connection .the system will scan the Media files on the internal SD card and external SD card(if you have one)..when finshing scan the internal SD card..but the phone can''t scan external SD card anymore.although you wait for a long time..some apps install in external SD card can't be reading or the phone will be hand up..you must reboot the phone to solve this problem.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] ka2uki:
try to put out the external SD card on the phone.and then connect PC again transfer some files and unmount the connection,system Media file scan is done ..not hand up problem..but in SiyahKernel never had this problem..maybe somethings wrong in it?:confused:
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] danieldmm:
You cote the OP! Why?

Cheers
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] :
@Phate

wtf???
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] ka2uki:
any way ,,my external SD card is 32GB C4 ..total space is 29.71gb ,available space is 6.77gb,22.94gb is in used..
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] barrist:
just a few hours in, and loving this. super smooth like void.echo was.. and maybe even a bit more ( could be just my imagination/placebo, but scrolling does seem damn smooth )

no issues so far.. will wait to judge battery life.

EDIT: are any of the tweaks enabled by default, or is the phoenix tweaks app required to enable them?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] panteleimonov:
@KNZO why dont you consider the decrease the market price of the app kernel,i think 3 Euro its a little much for this kind of app.I am useing the Phoenix kernel and its great but i want to buy the app for it but it come for me a little bit expensive.And if you decrease the prise i think much more people will buy it..Tnx
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] kickassdave:
The main differences between the two settings is the effect is has on whites and the effect it has on colour banding (the plague on this phone). Setting to native does noticeably reduce the banding. Not going to argue it any further.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] lsv-1:
Performance is awesome, but 50% in 5.5 hours it's too much battery drain (phone goes into deep sleep just fine), going back to void.echo!

:mad:
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tango280581:
Kernels spot on, bought app thats spot on. Definately ' the future '. Nice one
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] zikarus:
I had 30% decrease in 10 hours light to mid usage.

You should try to reflash after using the kernel cleaning script or manual cache cleaning...

GT 9100 tapatalking
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Mr.Greg:
+1 agree with you
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
We thought about the price really hard before publishing it and there are several reasons for it:

- It serves as donation both to me and aprold, you're buying each one beer.

- Amount of hours we spent in the application, initramfs, kernel, recovery, you name it.

- The amount of hours we will spend improving all the ones listed above.

- As far as I know, there's no other application in the market like this one, regardless of the community (at least yet, and I may be wrong though).

- And finally, it has a phoenix! :P

Either way, it'd also be unfair to those who already bought it if we lowered the price now.

So, sorry but the price will remain as it is!

Really? Fine here, something like zikarus.

Try changing the governor or inspect your consumption.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] lsv-1:
+1 :D

I couldn't buy it, I'm broke until the 28th. :(
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] JJEgan:
Fastest un tweaked kernel i have used so far hoping the battery life is good .

Whats 3 euros for such an expensive phone ???? Buy and support a dev .

jje
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] freemini:
If Google takes 30% like Apple, then devs get only about 2 euros, which they have to split since there are 2 devs we're talking about. You bought a 500 euro phone, 3 more ain't gonna kill you.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] dzel:
for 3 euro you cant support the dev?pfft.......
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tomeks:
exactly, people are using quite expensive phone with data plan, wants beter kernel every day and complain about 3euro.

some of you have no shame! really. if you could not afford do not buy, change the kernel, change the phone. there is much more choices. you name it :-)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] panteleimonov:
we may useing expensive phones but not many of us bought this phone from the market,some of us have second hand phones and more cheaper,but the disccusion ends there when knzo said that he would not decrease the market price so relax guys ;)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] mbutandola:
Come on guys! We are talking about 3€ here. Over here, a pack of cigarettes costs 6.10€. How much do you value the work of the devs? A lot of guys would easily spend more on a nice looking lady. :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
1.25 is ready to be released, we only need to integrate a few things on the application so you can expect it later today or tomorrow.

Main changes on top of my head include the fix to AOSP, init.d and custom boot animation erratic behavior. A few more tweaks, a new promising governor, oh and support for AT&T and NTT DoCoMo versions. Still working on the Korean one.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] bons:
Battery level drops while navigating.

Hi knzo,

Can you explain what you mean with "Current charge voltage interface".

- I installed your kernel succesfully, and bought Phoenix Tweaks from market.

- made a trip of about 1 hour, navigating with Sygic: battery level dropped

- I raised the charging current using "Voltage control"

- made another trip: still dropping battery level

- (re-)installed n.e.a.k. 1.3.2: battery charged while navigating

Don't undestand it.

I am sad, because I really would like to use your kernel for everyday use.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
I don't have an answer for that.

The current charging interface is from gokhanmoral and it's implemented on phoenix like it is on neak and siyah. I can assure you it's there, it's being built and it's working. So I don't really know what to tell you... I can test it again though but my car is in the mechanic this week.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] remorema:
Hi knzo!

does this one have bluetooth mice and keyboard support ?

edit: tested it and unfortunately there is still no mice and keyboard support :( also /system/media/bootanimation.zip wont work.

red on black recovery. seriously? not even luis filipe vieira would think on that. ICS mystic blue is the way to go ;)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] lsv-1:
Something I noticed today was that my viber app was not delivering any messages, as soon as I unlocked the screen, the messages came up right away, are there changes to the data connectivity to save battery or something?

:confused:

I really like the idea of a new kernel based on void.echo (the best kernel to me so far), but I never expected battery drain or weird behavior on this one.

Hopefully all the issues will be fixed soon, I want to give a try to the phoenix tweaks app :cool:
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
1.25 pushed.

Please refer to www.phoenix-kernel.com > Downloads repository.

Changelog updated and I need feedback from AT&T, NTT and Korean users to know if everything's working.

AOSP support and init.d are also fixed and enjoy the first S2 kernel to feature the new Wheatley governor by Ezekeel!

Phoenix tweaks will be updated to 1.2 in the next few minutes so these new users (usa,kor,nippon) can also update via OTA. (The OTA will not work until you upgrade to v1.2).
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tonysac:
When I choose reset to default in the application then in general tweeks I see remove journalism and remove i/o synch ticked..is it suppose to be like that or it should be un-ticked?

Sent from Galaxy
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
The default values aren't everything disabled. Some things are enabled by default.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] :
Any information on wheatley available?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=21638852&postcount=56
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] BrandoHD:
Info I have found is HERE
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Ernest05:
Your kernel is awesome.

Thank you !
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] sc00by666:
I have freez on quadrant standard 3D test with moon & planet. I must restart my device. 1.2.4 & 1.2.5 kernel.

Antutu have problem with 3D test, no freez, no FC.

Others better than good.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] poyda69:
installed V1.25 but there is no Wheatley Govenor?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
You need to enable the module first, this can be done on Phoenix tweaks.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] poyda69:
So you want us to pay for an app to enable features on your kernel?:confused:
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] BrandoHD:
I can confirm the exact issue with Quadrant, but I have no issues with Antutu....
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Entropy512:
I'm 75% positive gokhanmoral removed this interface, because it has been proven not to do anything except possibly allow misc charging to be bumped from 400 to 650 mA. See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FL71G2YEIHU - It turns out that just like on the I777, charge current control on the I9100 is handled by a MAX8922. Anyone with an ammeter or CurrentWidget can see this.

If the user you responded to was able to recharge when navigating on another kernel, it is most likely due to reduction in power consumption or your kernel being bugged and dropping the current to 400 mA.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
I stopped reading here.

I never claimed Lionheart is original work and if you read a few posts back I described exactly what I did: patch, morfic tweaks, arighi tweaks, tunables. And in the latest version one more tweak.

Droidphile pmed me today and the description about Lionheart came up as the subject. He suggested me to write one and showed me the previous. I replaced "...governor by knzo" for "put together by knzo". I don't consider myself the author of it, I just merged a bunch of tweaks, played around with options and liked the result.

Next time think twice and ask me my thoughts on the matter before coming here with your guns blazing; you've just came across like an idiot from my point of view since you're accusing me for something I never said. I don't get these flame'a'holic intents, seriously. Now, if you wish to discuss this matter further, click my nick and then click "send a private message". Thank you.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] simone201:
THIS is what i call good criticism! TYhanks for doing this Entropy! ;)

We need to preservate other's work, and also using a giant patch a a source is not fully complaining with GPL

Use GIT, use cherry-pick, but don't do this horrible patch please, it is kinda a big funny joke, isn't it?

Just my 2 cents as being a recognised dev (and always respecting GPL)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Entropy512:
I clearly remember that when this was the void.echo thread, you were passing it off as your original work. Good job erasing history, you've gone out of your way to remove any trace of void.echo. As I stated in my edit - claiming you have arighi's code in here to gain credibility when it's clear that nothing he wrote is in Lionheart is also fraudulent. In fact, he has no patches against the conservative governor - https://github.com/arighi/linux-gt-i9100/commits/master/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c

The mere renaming of the governor to Lionheart is fraudulent and clearly intended to mislead users with hype, considering how little of a difference it is from the original conservative governor. Seriously - it's two technical patches away (Edit: Both of which existed long before void, and neither of which were considered by their authors to be even remotely justification for giving the governor a new name.)

Even now, you are claiming that LionheartX is original work, right from your first post:

"The original LionheartX governor" - I'll need some time to look at it, but adding screen-off states to your kang is highly unlikely to constitute original work.

Let's not forget the post of yours that started this, where you claimed that no other kernel had the capabilities of the Lionheart governor, when if you read the above code, it's clear that at the very least, the following three kernels have the benefits of Lionheart included within the Conservative governor code:

My Daily Driver series on I777 (since October 6, 2011) (I admit, my minimum polling rate is higher at 25000 uS - but 10000 uS is getting dangerously close to the CPU's transition latency, to the point where the CPU is likely to spend more time jumping than actually doing work. Also the CPU load estimate will become poor at such a rapid sampling interval.)

Gokhanmoral's SiyahKernel (Since November 26, if not earlier)

Simone201's NEAK (Since October 28 or so)

As to why this was not a PM: Your history with void, the decision to rename a governor based on a tiny patch that has existed for months, and the very current title of this thread ("The future starts here!" - seriously?) show that you rely on misleading users with hype and marketing, when the reality is that your code has little to back up the hype.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] mbutandola:
Are we gonna witness a dev war here? This could have been dealt with in private. Anyway, with all due respect, I think I've lost confidence here. If this is just a patchwork of others work what's left here that is original development?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
You keep going at this? I already told you to send PM.

It's sad that you actually think you're trashing me when you're being pathetic. Arighi doesn't have conservative tweaks but has a commit for early behaviour on ondemand that can be somewhat applied to conservative. Thus, "arighi tweaks" and good opportunity for you to drop this.

Yes, clearly intended to mislead users with hype. Don't project on me.

We have a saying here: "pensa ladrão que todos são de sua condição". Roughly translated means: "Thieves always think the others are like him". So, don't put words in my mouth.

I'm starting to get a crack out of this. You only see what you want to see. The "original" here means it's the first S2 kernel to feature it, much like Wheatley.

At the time I got lionheart released, neak didn't exist, siyah didn't have conservative updated nor with any of morfic tweaks for instance. As for me starting this, I can see that now but I sure as hell didn't expect it. People see what they want, I meant it harmlessly even though the choice of words might have been ambiguous enough to pop some e-penis out there.

Now, enough nagging. Sigh.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] acolwill:
Nah, you'll be witnessing an actual developer verbally beating the **** out of a prolific liar.

You reserve the right to lose confidence. It's clear that knzo has no real answers and changing a couple of lines of code doesn't make him a developer.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] simone201:
NEAK didn't exist when you released void, in this you're right...but my repo was here since a month before! I was working on NEAK since a lot of time, but i thought to release it only when it was full of goodies...

Just see my repo history at the beginning and you'll see it! ;)

PS: and searching a repo is very easy in github

EDIT:

Here it is my "lionheart" commit: https://github.com/simone201/neak-kernel-sgs2/commit/f1a4606a07be603ee610d3c89635a30821c2f7f8

that is basically the netarchy commit for infuse
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] remorema:
I always liked void kernel but asking 2.99 to enable kernel features is just wrong.

Tapatalked from "The ICS Killer"
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Lulavc:
knzo, keep your good work.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Entropy512:
BS. The first post of this thread (which used to be the void thread...) is dated November 21, 2011.

https://github.com/simone201/neak-kernel-sgs2/commit/f1a4606a07be603ee610d3c89635a30821c2f7f8 is dated October 28, 2011

I'm not sure in what universe you live in that October 28 comes after November 21.

Also, you made the post that set this off at 8:51 AM TODAY, where you claimed that other kernels out there did not have "Lionheart" capabilities, when it is clear that they do, and have had the polling rate patch for fairly long periods of time - in fact for some of them, they had the patch before your kernel even existed.

Siyah's first commit of the polling rate tweak is pretty close to your initial release, but it is clear that its origins are netarchy's patch and not your release from the way it is written. That said, almost two months later you make a post claiming that SiyahKernel doesn't have a feature that it CLEARLY does have.

Morfic tweaks? Is this more marketing and hype to mislead users? Are you trying to claim that Lionheart has some special "morfic magic"? - as the diff above shows, it doesn't. It has NO tweaks other than backports, a one-liner from GM, and the polling rate patch.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] knzo:
Yeah, this is definitely cracking me up.

If you two want to be pathetic, then by all means, be. I'll tell you how pathetic you are being on your accusations. Let me see if I understand, you're saying I got stuff from that neak repo? Let's see...

First, I never saw that commit in my life. Supposedly I came across a repository that no one but the author knew that existed? Clearly the case, indeed.

Secondly, I never touched the MIN_SAMPLING_RATE_RATIO or .freq_step in Lionheart. Here's the source from void: http://pastebin.com/xhcYS2mW - by the way, hint hint, see the "patched & tweaked"? That's right, I never took it from more than it is. So if I "stole" this, why did I only steal part of it? Oh, wait...

Third, "MIN_SAMPLING_RATE_RATIO * jiffies_to_usecs(5); // 10" - do you see this on my source as well? Or do you see something different? Perhaps the morfic tweaks that you call "misleading": https://github.com/franciscofranco/Nexus-S/commit/e189d02cbb32c7aa400056ebc7959f3938b2a7ea - yeap, seems so.

Like I said before, you keep thinking you're trashing me when you're just embarassing yourself by shooting blanks there.

I tried to be polite and respectful, and forwarding you to private messaging where we could talk about this, but this is hard when you are not and doubt my word and keep the pathetic accusations. As you can see, I never lied when I said: patched, morfic tweaks, arighi tweaks, tunables. Keep saying otherwise if you want but to me you're just throwing petty arguments with no substance except the wish to see me trashed for whatever reason that is. Now, I won't post on this matter again (shouldn't be needed after what I posted above) and I do hope you **** off.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] BrandoHD:
Can you explain why?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Entropy512:
No, you didn't touch MIN_SAMPLING_RATE_RATIO - you commented out the code that calculated the minimum polling interval from this value and replaced it with a hardcoded value - an ugly hack that eliminated all portability and all safety checks (floors calculated from the cpu transition latency.) You commented out three lines of code (more if you include whitespace and comments) that calculate the minimum sampling interval for the governor, and replaced them with two hardcoded values, instead of changing the variables used to calculate this interval, which preserves the safety limits to prevent this value from becoming too close to the CPU transition latency. (Edit: This is especially significant since you blindly took the patch from a different CPU architecture)

Are you such a patch-o-matic that you can't even read a patch and see what it does? The comment above indicates that you are.

You have no arighi tweaks in Lionheart. You have no new tunables in Lionheart - The only "tunable" that really changed was the minimum polling interval, and the manner in which you did it is a hardcoded hack.

Now, I would have let this go, except you had the balls to say:

Which is a blatant and complete lie - Lionheart, in its essence, is nothing more than a reduction in the minimum sampling interval of the Conservative governor. You claim that no other kernel has this improvement, when the evidence is clear - Siyah has had it since nearly the same time Void was released, NEAK had it in its source tree on October 28, and for I777 users, my own kernel had it on October 6. Edit: The original patch dates all the way back to August 17.

And there's still the fact that you went out of your way to eliminate every single comment from the code. There's no possible explanation for this other than trying to hide the origin of your code. Too bad it couldn't hide from diff...
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] franciscofranco:
I had a laugh reading all this ****. I'm knzo's friend, for a long time already, but this is not the case here, and what I'm going to say it's for everyone:

It's ******* DISGUSTING what I read and watch here. I'll say it again, ******* disgusting. I thought XDA was a forum where intelligent, bright and friendly people got together to SHARE their ******* experiences and knowledge to take the most out of our devices. Instead you come here to cry about stupid ****s and who did this and who did that or whatever ****ing repo was taken from. GOD ******, you sound like 80 year old ladies. And you call yourself developers? ******* hell this is utter ****. I'm very disappointed about this community. This "was" all about the users and giving the best of us to discuss the best for our devices so lesser knowledgable users could afford our works, our codes and our experience.

The human greed is something that disgusts me, and while I sit and read all the **** that came out from all of you crying ladies, I begin to realize that this forum is soon to be lost. If you want to do something for this device, for gods sake work together and share, that's why Open Source software was created.

Good day.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Entropy512:
You realize you just reinforced my point - you claim that we should be sharing and open - well, if you look at my git repo, I make a point of being as open as possible. I actually make a point of commenting my reverts to say why I reverted something, which VERY few people do. I go to a significant amount of effort to try and preserve credit in my repo to those whom my code comes from. I have nothing to hide.

Contrast to knzo:

Void source was only released as a gigantic complete tarball. While this meets the letter of the GPL, it doesn't meet the spirit. It makes reviewing the code as difficult as possible without breaking the law.

One of my main complaints about the Lionheart code (other than the blatant hype) is that he has done more of the same - he goes out of his way to delete every single comment in the conservative governor's source code. There is no legitimate reason for doing this other than trying to obfuscate the code.

On top of that, he went so far as to market his own "product" and flame others, claiming that no other kernel had the same capabilities, which is blatantly wrong - plenty do, AND many of them had such features before void even existed.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] alinawyx:
No problem here.. on v1.25..