yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[G2 and Desire Z General] ohgood:
to use CM7 you need to do a full wipe. (do a nandroid first!)

the nightlies are good stuff.

to the OP: try cyanogenmod7 nightlies, they have DSM manager.
[G2 and Desire Z General] s09227:
So is the sound quality in miui roms really not that good? I heard that they suck LOL

I really want to go to miui for sometime but am I am not sure about the sound quality and I don't have the time to check out every rom by myself. I hope someone can give some advices.
[G2 and Desire Z General] rezapatel:
MIUI is pretty crap on sound output, although, the performance is pretty zippy but faced more FCs compared to CM7.1. Went for Bulletproof MIUI, but the general issues are inherited from the MIUI base.

Recently, I have moved to ILWT CM7.1 and used multiple versions from ILWT. This seems to be the best for me yet and plan to stick to it. Couple of things that made me move include much much better sound, more stable, less FCs and OS environment native to android.

Sent from my HTC Vision
[G2 and Desire Z General] rezapatel:
Try the ILWT CM7.1. Simply go to your CWM Recorvery, do a full factory wipe, dump your cache and install the rom zip. This has always worked for me for most roms - generally the miui or cm7 based roms worked flawlessly using the above method.

Sent from my HTC Vision
[G2 and Desire Z General] s09227:
OK thanks for the advices guys , just a few questions to ask. Is it fine if I am using 4EXT recovery than CWM to flash? And how is the sound volume? Cuz on sense roms the sound volume is really low.

Thanks.

Desire Z TRANS-AM sense 3.0
[G2 and Desire Z General] s09227:
And can someone tell me what player are you on cm7

HTC DZ with Sense 3.5
[G2 and Desire Z General] rezapatel:
I don't think that should be an issue.

Sent from my HTC Vision
[G2 and Desire Z General] rezapatel:
Don't use it too frequently, but when I do, its the default cm7 music / video players.

Sent from my HTC Vision
[G2 and Desire Z General] s09227:
What about player pro

HTC DZ with Sense 3.5
[G2 and Desire Z General] :
Right now I'd wait with playing with ROMs until ICS based ones are available...
[G2 and Desire Z General] rezapatel:
Sceptical, if they will work perfectly, offering the same level of multitasking and snappiness on our G2/Desire Z devices. Surely, not the first few rom versions.

Sent from my HTC Vision
[G2 and Desire Z General] rezapatel:
Sorry, no idea.

Sent from my HTC Vision
[G2 and Desire Z General] WTF?:
I like a fast lite ROM with rock solid reliability and no glitches or force closes and everything works as it should + crazy long battery life!!

I am a ROM testing junkie, but my all time favorite and daily driver is G-lite 1.07 with some additional optimizations of my own. (no sense though)

and by the way, Neutron Music player BEATS beats audio for sound quality!
[Motorola Droid Bionic] qubanaso:
Im having trouble downloading music from any webpage, anyone having the same trouble?
[Motorola Droid Bionic] Brenardo:
goto market and search for download all files
[Gen8, Gen9, Gen10 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ammaz.khan:
BUT. Since I have Chulri temp root, and have Rooted initramfs + kernel in my Archos101 g8, is it safe to follow the procedure of the above link :\ :confused:

Cant link O-o just arctablet(dot)com and cm7 post :p
[Gen8, Gen9, Gen10 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] cajl:
it is not possible

i use the recovery menu

and reinit the archos

before install the sde and CM ...
[Gen8, Gen9, Gen10 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] fzelle:
Chulri root and the OpenAOS Multiboot are not compatible, but OpenAOS ultiboot

does the same for the archos orginal FW, so you don't "need" both.
[Gen8, Gen9, Gen10 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ammaz.khan:
OK, so chulri is on dev edition, hmmmmm, a complete system restore should do the trick right?:confused:
[Gen8, Gen9, Gen10 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] fzelle:
You are talking in riddels.
[Gen8, Gen9, Gen10 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ammaz.khan:
Ikr? >_< iSuck
[LG Revolution] bken620:
I loaded 1.2 and am having problems with data, I'm stuck in 1x while my gf with a Droid pro, sitting right next to me, has 3g. I've restarted my phone a couple times and it has changed nothing. Any suggestions?
[LG Revolution] bken620:
Furthermore, if i pick cdma only, it goes right to 3g, is anyone else having this issue?
[LG Revolution] trampledbyturtles:
Was your phone in 4G when you flashed the ROM?

VS910 4G [ICK GV 1.2]
[LG Revolution] bken620:
Yes
[LG Revolution] jamRwoo:
Just out of curiosity...

Settings > About Phone > Network Type and Strength

What is showing in there? I'm just curious if it possibly differs from what the statusbar is showing you.
[LG Revolution] G4 Man2:
Just had this problem!! Aparently you need background data and mobile data enabled when u flash GV (aparently has something to do with 4G) i just enabled them and re-flashed GV and now i gots my 3G, hope this helps!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] chaosjh:
i have seen the t-mobile thread but no mention of att. do any of you smart fellas know:

1. is this phone coming to att and

2. will it have lte (dealbreaker for me as i'm looking to the future)?

3. if no to either of the previous, how can i convince my girl to leave att for verizon when she gets a discount at att?

edit: and yes i have googled and read for days...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] pukemon:
Unlocked version will work on atnt. Why convince your girl to pay more with a crappy company just so you can get a phone? How would you like it if she convinced a guy to get with her and leave you because he had bigger....discount?

I invented cyberspace. You're trespassing.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] justanothernoob:
I'm on ATT as well and to be honest with you i've saved my pennies and am waiting for the unlocked version to come to US. If the nexus comes to att it wont be for a while. I also doubt that there will be an ATT LTE version of this phone. And thats not a deal breaker as there is no LTE coverage in my area from either of the big two US providers and I dont expect it anytime soon.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] altimax98:
I dont know who your girlfriend works for but alot of companies like mine have discounts on all the carriers
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] chaosjh:
i don't want to go to verizon by any means, and i have little fear of my girl finding a bigger...discount, lol. assuming the unlocked version has lte that works, i am fine with that.

arvest, altimax, and only att...

att "claims" that it will be rolling out to 55% of the nation by end of 2012 and 80+% by 2013. i'm pretty sure i'm in there and thinking you maybe as well unless your a hilljack...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] pukemon:
Houston is supposed to be lit up but i could care less. Lte battery life is horrendous. Its still early tech. And hspa+ is plenty fast as is and can be turned up faster and still do faster and better on battery than current lte. Lte phone probably wont be on my radar for at least two years. In the meantime, i hope the nexus can hold up for ~2 years.

I invented cyberspace. You're trespassing.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] martonikaj:
No, the unlocked version does

not

have LTE. You'd be getting the HSPA+ version for use on AT&T. The only LTE version is CDMA/LTE for Verizon.

If you stay with AT&T, you surely won't be disappointed with the HSPA+ speeds.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] chaosjh:
i have the atrix, i know what hspa+ can do and it's fine. i'm starting to think it may just be better to wait for a ics handset next year, i have just always wanted a nexus and thought this was finally my chance, but i'm not gonna pay 800 bucks for a phone and not even get tech that will last over 6 months. sigh...such a beautiful phone though...pure...google...sob
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] s.m.knipe:
AT& T gets (officially) nexii a few months later, so with patience LTE MAY be a reality (come spring). I personally think this is reinforced by the rumors/leaks of a US Cellular (who hasn't even began 4G LTE rollout- unless they cut a roaming agreement with Verizon) LTE GN.

Yes the unlocked HSPA+ one will work, but i think there is a reason why Verizon is the "exclusive launch" for the LTE version, and not just the exclusive carrier of the LTE version... I think there is a reason why that wording was chosen.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] martonikaj:
I'm assuming you're indicating that your only option would be importing a phone? I'd just wait a couple weeks and see if it will be available unlocked in the US. If it is, then you'll be able to pick one up under $600, and won't have to import.

As far as AT&T carrying it with a subsidy, I wouldn't put too much stock in that. I don't see it happening.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] systoxity:
I feel ya, I recently glanced through sprint's plans and pricing and am considering switching over. Hope they get a Nexus phone XD.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] martonikaj:
Ugh. I used to be with Sprint. Their plans are nice, but their coverage really isn't great, their 3G is abysmally slow, and their WiMax (even when you can get it) isn't worth the battery drain.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] chaosjh:
I'm assuming importing would be the quicker option as i don't see the US getting an unlocked version until verizon is done with it and by then other phones (quadcores) will be sporting ics and it won't matter. i want 4.0 pure and would prefer lte for the future but i don't see myself getting that this month unless i import. do you think differently?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] xManMythLegend:
I have to be honest...Im truly shocked it wasnt ATT trying to get exclusivity going.

They seemed Android lusty after iphone went to VZ. Dont know why they wouldnt go after the GN.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] martonikaj:
What I'm saying is we really don't know... anything. So just hang out a couple more weeks and see. Don't make some decision based on rumor and speculation. I don't see VZW having a long exclusivity (if any). I also don't see other carriers picking it up for subsidy. There's no money in the Nexus program (compared to made-for-carriers locked handsets with carrier bloat and control). I do see it coming to the US unlocked very soon though. Google has no reason not to.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] chaosjh:
i wish they would do what samsung has done with the galaxy s line. actually i wish they would all do this. the galaxy s is on all carriers (although with a few changes as the carriers feel they want to buy to be different). this approach is the start of one of androids biggest problems, splintering. if motorola, samsung, sony, and google gave all the carriers the droid, galaxy, ericson/expieria, and nexus lines to all carriers, splintering would be less of a problem. but carriers are to greedy and spend millions for exclusive rights on lines instead of puuting money into projects worthy of such funds (um, 4g). i am glad ics unifies android a bit more but i am still certain that hardware will still have to be worked with in order to work right that's why i think the gnexus has tried and true hardware instead of the latest and greatest...which is why i want the phone so bad. here is to the future of only a handful of android devices, one of the few things apple almost got right.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] s.m.knipe:
Speculation on AT&T

THIS IS PURE SPECULATION AND INTERPOLATION FROM THE PREVIOUS RELATIONSHIPS OF AT&T AND THE NEXUS LINE

I am going to go ahead and call that there will be an official AT&T LTE model in as early as about two months, but no later than 6 months- with 5-6 months being more likely. (Sadly this seems like it will be well past the GN's industry-driving moment)

Path to this ASSUMPTION:

There was an official AT&T banded Nexus One launched 71 days after the T-mo version.

There was an official AT&T banded Nexus S launched 231 days after the T-mo one.

There has been a (possibly fake) leak of an LTE version on a regional carrier that has not focused on LTE (to my knowledge) yet- If there is a possibility it will go to them as LTE why not to a carrier that has (limited) LTE now? (also, as I acknowledge in an earlier post this is probably through a roaming agreement on Verizon's LTE network, but US Cellular would still have to market/talk about/make a big deal about it, and the fact that they haven't really hyped it tells me that it isn't ready yet)

AT&T's network arrived earlier than originally thought- phones on it were planned originally for 2012, as per their comments to questions at the Atrix4G announcement last winter. We now have two phones launched on the network. I am not saying they sped up network development for the GN (far from it- AT&T seems to hate the Nexii), but the network has been sped up and is now in place for the GN to take advantage of.

I say that 5-6 months is more likely because of three reasons:

Statistically (which if you know about statistics, this doesn't mean much), the average delay time (from device launch to AT&T specific launch) is 151 days.

AT&T does not trust/like having unlocked developer/Nexus devices in the hands of the masses on their network (they have lightened up on this somewhat lately), and so will push off the launch of an official GN as long as they can (as they have done).

Like the Nexus S (which had a delay time of 231 days), the GN is made by Samsung who seem to take a little while getting US phones out the door, and so the AT&T model will probably see a similar delay as the AT&T NS.

I should also add that I don't think AT&T has ever subsidized a Nexus phone- so don't expect them to with this one either. Like I said, they seem to hate the prospect of these unlocked developer phones running around on their network. Funny thing is, I have three friends who work for AT&T and all of them have the Nexus S, and they tell me all the time how much the engineers hate them having "open" devices. Craziness.

Hate on me if you want for feeding the speculation fire, but this is how I see it playing out. And honestly, despite my initial disappointment, I think I am fine with a wait time like that. I hope I'm wrong on it, but it will be fine.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] pukemon:
Ant never had a 'branded' nexus device is just compatible release of the phone.

I invented cyberspace. You're trespassing.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] s.m.knipe:
Yeah, that's why I said "banded" not "branded" ;)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] pukemon:
Oops. Whistles and walks away.

I invented cyberspace. You're trespassing.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] upyouratrix:
I can agree with your theory, however, you left out one important piece of of hope... the HSPA+ version is pentaband, so the same phone will work on AT&T and Tmo. Did you notice that Tmo has had the Galaxy phones first? I'm willing to bet (and this is just my theory) that Verizon doesn't have an exclusive on this phone (I hope Google is smart to realize that are far more people on GSM that have supported the Nexus line for years), and I'm willing to bet Best Buy will carry the Galaxy Nexus in store for Tmo (subsidized), but since it's pentaband, we could buy the phone at full price (it should be unlocked) and just pop in our AT&T sim card.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] s.m.knipe:
I agree totally. I am just torn over pulling the trigger for the HSPA+ (and settling) or waiting for an LTE capable version. Above I am just reasoning the likelihood and approximating the waiting period to get an AT&T LTE friendly version...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] ragingclue:
I agree. However, I'd rather get the H+ one soon and not hold out entirely for the LTE version. Six months down the road, if I decide I need LTE for whatever reason, there might be some better options.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] deeken:
According to this Samsung Rep this phone will only be going to Verizon:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQ8t1VHqDGE
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] chaosjh:
http://www.samsung.com/us/register/galaxynexus/

i know somebody here already was asking about this register having at&t and there where speculations, but here is a thought. maybe they want to see how many at&t users are interested. just an idea but to intertain it, would everybody do me a favor and register? (preferably to at&t, lol)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] justabrake:
That's very old
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] chaosjh:
oh...so not worth it?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] s.m.knipe:
I wondered about the same thing. The list seems more like a survey (all possible responses) than a selection...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] chaosjh:
that's what i was thinking and since it's at samsung, no harm done right? idk, i really want the gnexus...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] aldo37:
I don't understand, the GSM model coming out is an AT&T model, along with T-Mobile. It will work on both.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] farfromovin:
Maybe the OP is looking for a carrier subsidized version? Personally, is like to just see one, non carrier specific GSM Pentaband, but oh well. I hope the LTE version gets little developer interest. It's quite dumb to have two different versions of a developer phone.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] s.m.knipe:
HSPA+ yes, but I was thinking LTE now that AT&T lit up their network
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] player911:
Hush your mouth. :)

The talks sugguest that the phones will be identical aside from those two parts. Hopefully roms simply require an exchange of drivers. Hopefully devs can incorporate both radio drivers and be done with it.

My company uses Verizon and o hope to gain a GN and cancel my personal tmo service. Kinda pointless to have a Nexus if it doesn't get support.

G2x - 2.3.7 CM7

Transformer - 3.2 Revolver OC/UV
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] upyouratrix:
Ugh... Fox news, really? They're the "Verizon" of news.

I still think we'll see the GSM version here unlocked same day. If we don't, I think we should put together some sort of a lawsuit to stop this stupid exclusive BS that these US carriers pull!!! I'm an N1 owner, and gosh darn it, I want a GSM Galaxy Nexus that I can buy in the US, at a store, same day as it's released in the US. It's complete utter BS that I even have to THINK about importing one, considering one phone will work on both US GSM carriers. And the fact that the US dollar stinks and $700+ for a phone is a little insane! AHHHHH... I'm so frustrated!
[Defy General] yuffany:
Currently Defy Cm7 is a Gingerbread system based on Froyo core drivers (from stock Defy rom). Compared to "real" Gingerbread-based Defy+ system, cm7's setting has a few drawbacks:

1. Hardware acceleration of video codecs are under-supported. (Defy+ support H/W acceleration for a wider range of formats including h.263, and plays h.264 faster than cm7. Capability of 720p recording is also a merit.)

2. Call recording is not supported, workarounds are buggy. (Defy+ supports call recording flawlessly)

Since there have been fixed-sbfs ripped from Defy+ stock roms around the internet for some time, will cm7 shift its development to a "real" Gingerbread base of Defy+?
[Defy General] hackergnome:
U can use defy+ as ur base for cm7...
[Defy General] yuffany:
Really? I couldn't find a way to do that. :(

I flashed fixed sbf of defy+ and then flash cm7-nightly, but failed to go beyond the red M sign. The only working way was to flash CM7.1-stable, which installed its own Froyo base over the existing defy+ base. Therefore I still ended up having a cm7 system with froyo base.

Maybe I missed something? :confused:
[Defy General] yuffany:
The unofficial CM7.1.0-11 is starting to integrate video and camera enhancement (720p recording is around the corner), maybe Quarx is starting to integrate defy+ core driver into defy CM7. I'll try this version.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] tigerz0202:
ok ive never liked samsung phones before till i got to play with this beast in the tmo store the other day ,ive already orderded mine and will be getting it in a few days.ive always i guess you could call it "hating" on samsung because i thought their build quality was poor and they tried to be too much like iphone. Well that was then and this is now.The sgs2 won me over instantly when i started playing with it and i even forgot i was looking at a screen with a lower resolution than my sensation because it was so clear and bright. i cant wait to root this thing and install custom roms .ive heard that samsung phones have data issues and reception issues. that didnt seem to be a problem with the demo i got to mess with .any info will be appreciated
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] movieaddict:
that was only with the vibrant, so far that i know! My new sgs2 is fine with all that
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] teshxx:
I can't wait for root either. Coming from sensation, which is a big phone, this feels humongous. I am sure using different launcher we can utilize the screen size with 5x5 . Love it so far.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] tigerz0202:
yeah it looks massive. i had an HD2 which also was a little bigger than my sensation screen .i guess i just missed a big ol' screen to look at.I played som HD videos on both phones right next to each other and i really could not tell a difference aside from the samsung looked a little brighter. The camera on my sensation was probably a little better but i had the Amaze camera on it and its pretty good, but the camera on the S2 looked great as well so no loss there.Phone was snappy as hell and for people who judge by quadrants i was getting over 3300 on the Demo ,any how thanks for the replies
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] digiholic:
Like many people I've been eyeing the SGSII since last winter. I wanted it more than the Sensation. It just took the phone too long to drop here. I used a family upgrade on the Sensation in June and fell in love with it. The Sensation ruined me for this phone. I checked out the SGSII today and the 800 x 480 screen is a no-go for me. It's a personal thing for me as I like very tiny text on the screen and it is much easier to read on my Sensation. Plus there is a ton of ROM development for the Sensation. That and I'm perversely attracted to the feel on the Sensation.

The next family upgrade might still be with Sammy though as I'll be eyeing the Prime and even more resolution.

Other than that the SGSII is a beast internally. TouchWiz is lame IMHO but ROMs should fix that problem soon enough. I do like the phone a lot and don't want to say the Sensation is better, I just like it better. I had the wife try out the SGSII to see if she wanted one, but she just aggravated me. ;) I tried to explain to her what a beast of a phone it is, but it was lost on her non-technical mind. That and she knew if she got it, I would be f'ing with it all the time.

Alas Sammy you guys took too long (probably US carrier's fault) and released this badboy here right before you drop the Prime? The delay cost you possible HTC converts (like me) and maybe Sammy fans with the Prime so close.

Is it just me thinking that way?

Sorry if I sound negative against the SGSII, the phone rocks so that's not my intent.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] j0hnZ:
I can't stand vanilla android or small text, so no.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] tigerz0202:
no offense here. main reason i got rid of my sensation is the damn dust under the screen issue . i dont know if i just hit a homerun in the bad luck dept. or what but i sent the phone back 4 times and the last return they sent me had the problem worse than any that i had. It didnt bother me at first but i just couldnt see paying that much for a phone with a repetitive defect so i decided to give samsung a try
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] aim1126:
I've gone through about 6 of them because of the same issue. The last one I got finally doesn't have any dust but the wifi keeps dropping no matter what rom I use
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] Jjday7:
Just out of curiosity. Has there ever been reports from older samsung phones that had dust in the screen issues?

I have a plug that I use for my aux 3.5mm but if I don't have to use it, then I rather not.