yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Misterjunky:
links

The original link works fine, but it's not the "I777Uckj4" as the link

says it is, its I777Uckj2.

So if its kj2 then why is it advertised/posted as "I777Uckj4"?

The link is NEW with todays date and it says:

[Firmware][2.3.6] I777UCKJ4 (Galaxy S II AT&T)

Download: http://bit.ly/semlQ2

Changes 2.3.5 -> 2.3.6:

[Google] voice search fixes

[Samsung] removed home button double tap

Issues:

[Samsung] push email still drains the battery more the normal

clicking the above link you get a new IE page with a link for

Firmware][2.3.6] I777Uckj4 (Galaxy S Ii At&t)

Clicking on the link below the actual download is I777Uckj2.

Download: http://www.ponack.ne...wiki/I777UCKJ4/

Hope this makes at least some sense :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] shansmi:
Because whoever leaked this either made a mistake with the links or got a C&D then linked back to the original load. The load is real :-)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Misterjunky:
New link in New post

Well after reading all the posts after the new link was posted, I can't even find one person who actually flashed it yet. :)

So I will wait and see!

---------- Post added at 09:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:40 PM ----------

How is it working for you?

Do you still have it installed or did you restore a backup of some other rom?

Does the "about" in settings actually say its i777UCKJ4 & 2.3.6 ?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] shansmi:
So far so good. Yes it is installed and yes the about info is correct.

:cool:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] designgears:
haha, woops, forgot the edit the index before uploading...

all fixed.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] SeanHacker:
thanks a lot bro
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Misterjunky:
rooting

Will the superoneclick root this 2.3.6 or do we need a different

rooting method?

(I know we need to odin flash the CWM compatible kernel TAR file first.)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] pinoymutt:
Does the KJ4 leak have the new bootloaders that kills the jig trick like the KJ2 leak?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] designgears:
Sure does.. doesn't matter tho, find me an AT&T employee that knows how to check it ;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] SeanHacker:
Very true. My fiance works for att and doesn't know sh@t about this kinda stuff. She takes flashed out phones all the time and replaces them for people. All the reps aren't there to check that kinda stuff out. They just make sure its a phone you got from them.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] shoman94:
Can someone pull me the modem for KJ4? Thanks
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] bella92108:
HEHE, we all give ATT employees way way way too much credit sometimes. They still believe that AT&T is "leading the way..." in 4G technology, hehe.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] gharris040604:
So is this rooted or do we need to flash code's kernal.again.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] bella92108:
Did you read he thread? Clearly states it's not rooted. Also states if you do root it you're going to have the "!" triangle back and not be able to resolve it yet because this has the new bootloader.

Gotta read before you ask. Not like this is a 50 page thread that would take all day to read or anything, lol.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] gharris040604:
Thanks for the reply must of looked right over that part while reading. lol :confused:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] designgears:
The triangle part isn't true, once you flash that kernel it roots the system, then you dump the system, flash stock again, then flash system back.

simple :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] bella92108:
You can't go back to the old bootloader. You're mixing the two things up.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] shansmi:
This is now at least 3 posts where you bash employees. You are entitled to an opinion but remember the old saying about having one. Maybe those you come in contact with have less knowledge and there is very likely a GOOD reason for that but I can assure you there are those that know!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] bella92108:
Sorry, just not a fan of unionized workforces in the retail world, it creates the most horrid service. Did I mention I don't like ATT retail employees? hehe
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] shansmi:
Uh wrong AGAIN!!!! The bootloader is part of the one click installer. You can easily go back and the old bootloader is even posted so you can go back with odin as well.

---------- Post added at 11:28 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:25 AM ----------

I don't like unions either but that mainly affects techs in the MTSOs, not sales reps to my knowledge. I will ask about unions when I hit a corp store later today.

=====================

One could root via the method that does not trip the counter or cause the triangle. It works great! :-)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] bella92108:
I know from personal experience the sales force is 100% unionized. :-)

At least the upside of them being union is that they're not compensated on individual sales, so they're not pushy like mall kiosks.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] designgears:
Updated the download to a no bootloader, pre-rooted edition... enjoy :)

also added the kernel and modem as separate downloads
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] bella92108:
So no more need for USB jigg? And so can just flash? Does it overwrite the OS so I have to reload my apps or does it just update the background?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] designgears:
its a stock firmware, it will return your phone to stock... minus the sdcards
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] bella92108:
Nice work. I don't want to have to re setup everything without any major upside. Hopefully the devs will make something cool of this tho.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Misterjunky:
Just wondering

I just wonder why this thread is not in XDA Developers forum

like all the other roms, kernels, modems and stuff? :)

Also I just downloaded all three TAR files and the actual firmware

"I777UCKJ4 Rooted, NO Bootloaders, Galaxy S II AT&T ONLY" TAR

file already contains a kernel and modem in the firmware file.

So what is the purpose of the seperate kernel.tar and modem.tar files?

Just trying to make sense of this "B4" flashing ! :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] pinoymutt:
The separate kernel and modem are just for folks who have their own "frankenbuilds" or feel like messing with just both (or either) of those components in another build.

If you are going to go all in with the KJ4 package, no need to worry about the separate components.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] kdwolf85:
If I remember right Samsung has to update the software, unless they want anotherlawsuit, because it uses the "bounce patent" that apple owns. Correct me if I'm wrong.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] mjgspr95:
Fails when I try to use odin. Went back to complete stock jk2 as well and started from there... still failed.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] pakxelaos:
I try odin too, no go. I was panic for a moment, I thought I brick it ;)

Got it back to KJ2
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] designgears:
ugh, not sure what happen to the file but it didn't get uploaded right, it is fixed now.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] vladm7:
so to confirm: this one doesn't have CWM embedded yet, so once loaded, we'll need to flash future updates manually via adb console (or via odin if we don't care for triangle)?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] designgears:
This isn't a rom, this is a stock firmware...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] kytrauma:
Has anyone tried the modems on one of our cooked roms yet?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] shoman94:
I just loaded KJ4 on UnNamed. All we can do is try them and see if it changes anything ....
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Misterjunky:
Google Search

Wonder why it is when I GOOGLE this firmware, every single results in google

lead right back here to XDA's i777 General forum which we are in now.

Below is an example of google search results, there are about 10 of these

almost identical results and nothing else pertaining to i777UCKJ4 shows up

in the entire google when searching. (Perhaps this I777UCKJ4 is just a big secret.)

[

Firmware][2.3.6] I777UCKJ4 (Galaxy S II AT&T) - xda-developers

xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=19087886

PDA=I777UCKJ4 ro.build.hidden_ver=I777UCKJ4 ro.build.changelist=691741

ro .product.cpu.abi2=armeabi ro.product.manufacturer=samsung ...

Check it out yourselves, do a google search for "I777UCKJ4" & and see your own results!

What do YOU think...... :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] RockRatt:
DG is it possible to get the modem from the 2.3.5 and 2.3.6 leaks? I am guessing they are different from the 2.3.4 modem from stock.

If so will we be able to flash different modems easily as we did with the captivate? Using multiple i9000 modems or the few i879 modems?

I would love to try out other modems to see what works best in my area as I did with the cappy. Thanks

Sent From My KICKASS CM7 AT&T SGS2
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] mjgspr95:
Had SU but not rooted... Just rooted and set up like before. Play with it tomorrow.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] spaml:
doesn't seem to be pre-roooted. no problem, i try to root but for some reason after flashing the kernel my wifi doesn't work

every time i connect the usb cable, it goes into MTP mode by default instead of mass storage
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] shoman94:
Just follow the link to the download .... this modem is posted. I'm using it.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] dwaleke:
I had no wifi with entropy's kernel (11/3 and 10/20 exp). Just rooted the stock kernel and everything seems to be working fine. Makes me wonder what is different with 2.3.6.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] mjgspr95:
Same fix I did in kj2 worked. in generl

Forum I'll link later

i777 stock

Entropy512 Doom

Onepointsixingit
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] SSJ_Gomike:
So freaking true it's unbelievable ....

Went to look at the skyrocket yesterday at the att corporate store.....

Asked to see the new Skyrocket ....after staring with a blank face for 10 seconds he said and I quote "Is that a phone?"
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] pakxelaos:
Thank You

Yeah, I got it from yours on previous (2.3.5 firmware discussion link) Replacing that 2 conf files in system/etc/wifi. Change permission and Voila my wifi working again ;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] dwaleke:
Worked for me too. Copied those two files over and flashed Entropy's 11/3 kernel. Thanks mjgspr95!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] pinoymutt:
Are you seeing any noticeable difference with the KJ4 modem? (coverage, sound quality, GPS)?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] shoman94:
Nothing noticeable except that it like to camp on 1900 a bit more. Give me a couplle more days on it.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] pinoymutt:
Maybe AT&T is getting ready to get some of the 1900 Spectrum back that they had to give away to TMo a few years back (at least in my area they did) :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] RockRatt:
Thanks for letting me know. I am gonna shoot you a pm with a question. Don't want to jump over DGs work here.

Sent from My KickAss CM7 Captivate
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] papashex:
DG - Could you do a 1 click KH7 w/boot loaders to help us (ok me) recover from the KJ4 boot loaders?

I have since learned how to get the previous full KJ4 w/BL rooted & CWM'd without odin, but will need to go back to KH7 when my jig shows up to reset flash counter.

Thanks for ALL of your efforts.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] pinoymutt:
You could just flash the stock bootloader itself from http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1316726 without needing to completely revert back.

Also -- if you are using the latest package that DG uploaded for KJ4, there are no bootloaders in the package.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] papashex:
Forgive me but I'm still trying to figure a few things out.

I thought SBL = secondary boot loader, implying a primary boot loader to be required someplace. I know in the captivate froyo to gb migration there were some problems with boot loaders of 2 different versions being accidently flashed.

If SBL is al there is to worry about I'll give that a shot. I was just hoping to make it idiot proof for myself and any others. Thanks for the link.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] pinoymutt:
You are correct, the SBL is the secondary boot loader -- but in this particular case, apparently it's the SBL that has the little "nastiness" that prevents the jig from resetting the counter, so the folks in the other thread found that reverting back to the stock one cured the issue.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] pinoymutt:
Just curious -- since for some reason the root doesn't seem to be there as mentioned above, has anyone tried the ZergRush root on it? Was thinking of trying this instead of messing with kernel swaps (or until Entropy updates the DD to be fully compatible with the latest leaks without needing to mess with transplanting wifi & tethering files).

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1321582
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] dwaleke:
Yes it does. I rooted with that before I figured out the kernel stuff.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] mjgspr95:
Curious, was your wifi broke after root?

Rom: i777 kj4 (leak)

Mod: 14 toggle

Kernel: Entropy512 Doom

Onepointsixingit
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] dwaleke:
Well I didn't try the wifi until after I rooted it. I had to replace the two files in the etc/wifi folder and then it started working.

Although the wifi that I was connecting to at work is a little flakey. So I guess it is possible that if I waited long enough it would actually connect, but the two files are different between this firmware and the rest that I've been using.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Misterjunky:
But why do you have to ROOT this firmware when the OP says it's ROOTED :)

[Firmware][2.3.6] I777UCKJ4 (Rooted, NO Bootloaders, Galaxy S II AT&T ONLY)

(perhaps it even contains a bootloader too so be careful.)

Gotcha!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] dwaleke:
Well I connected to the phone with adb shell. Typed su and no go.

Rooted it and then it worked. Some others posted about no root earlier in the thread too.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] pinoymutt:
Mr. J -- you haven't read the whole thread have you? :D

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=19124058&postcount=51

and the Bootloaders have been removed (DG updated the OP)

---------- Post added at 01:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:46 PM ----------

I was curious about the same thing -- whether it was the kernel/rooting process that seems to bork the Wifi (since it involved using a KH7 kernel) or if the KJ2/KJ4 firmwares themselves have some flaky wifi files (which would explain why these are "leaks" and not fully released updates)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Misterjunky:
OP not changed

I did check out the thread and the OP says its rooted, everyone else says its not.

So how are we to believe it has no bootloaders by just reading the OP?

People really need to check it out just to be sure...

In the very first OP it did not even have the correct filename if you recall.

Check the very first post and you will see it still says ROOTED and NO BOOTLOADERS.

I again copied/pasted the OP thread title below.

It's NOT rooted and since it says it is rooted it might be wise to check for bootloaders too...

(Who knows halloween was just a few days ago if you get my drift.) :)

( [Firmware][2.3.6] I777UCKJ4 (Rooted, NO Bootloaders, Galaxy S II AT&T ONLY))

For some reason I cannot make heads or tails of that link you posted, I must have read it at least 3 times, it looks

like whoever wrote that post is already having problems with this firmware and he is just a NOOB! :)

Oh well, that's enough of my conspiracy theories....... :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] dwaleke:
The stock 2.3.6 kernel works just fine with the wifi. Had to change the two files to have it work with Entropy's kernel.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] allyrocky:
Hi does flashing to this firmware wipe of all apps and settings ?

Also does it increase the flash counter
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] mjgspr95:
Does not increase flash counter.

I've been using this for a couple days now rooted (non kernel method) and using Tegrak Ultimate for OC/UV. I've yet to find any flaws or bugs and battery life is good. My phones bench marks are just as high as with Entropy512s Kernel higher on some because Tegrak has GPU OC/UV as well. Broswer seems to do text wrap now too. I think a Dev should create a ROM from this, I wish I knew how... just Deodexed would be nice to theme easier.

No I haven't changed my signature yet... stock kernel now. Still onepointsixingit...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] pinoymutt:
I'm with you on that one -- surprised no one has jumped on using KJ4 as a base for some ROM goodness.

Maybe, it's as someone suggested in another thread that many of the Devs expecting some ICS goodness to possibly be available in some form or fashion on the i9100 side soon, so maybe better to play with this stuff than mess with a leak.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] shoman94:
I guess non of the devs we have so far want to play with leaks. :(
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] allyrocky:
Thanks. I updated to 2.3.6 and it looks like it is not rooted as the OP claims.

Any idea how to root it without increasing the flashcounter ?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] gtg465x:
Try installing superuser and busybox from the Market.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] allyrocky:
did it already. When I open BusyBox it says the device is not rooted
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] mjgspr95:
I was able to extract a few things from Blue Monkey Theme (odex) to work with jk4. Notifiction dropdown and most apps. Do not mess with system framework.

i777 ucjk4

tegrak

blue monkey tweaks
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] mjgspr95:
Few shots

ROM: i777 uckj4

Kernel: uckj4

Theme: blue monkey (pieces)

tegrack oc/uv
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] gtg465x:
But did you install SuperUser first?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Misterjunky:
Rooted

Why would anyone expect this firmware to be rooted when the OP says it's rooted! :)

I mean the OP is always right, right? :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] allyrocky:
Anyways Thanks guys for your reply . I rooted the device ..
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] eep2378:
I might have to give this a try:)
[HTC Sensation] webmaster:
It was suggested to me that in order to prevent excessive battery drain and heat when using CM7 I should disable one of the cores. Has anyone done this? What negative impacts could doing this cause (if any)?
[HTC Sensation] Chilled26:
If anything it would increase battery drain due to all the processing being put on one single core, what I would recommend for a decrease in battery drain is different kernels with under volting options. That's what's worked best for me.
[HTC Sensation] webmaster:
It was my perception that the older single core phones had better battery life. Do you really think it would hurt the battery?
[HTC Sensation] aNYthing24:
Dual core isn't properly utilized yet so it might not be a bad idea.
[HTC Sensation] Chilled26:
Here is an example of my battery drain for today with the bricked kernel v1.4.
[HTC Sensation] septix:
Changing kernel and undervolting did the trick for me. Getting 20 hours moderate use.
[HTC Sensation] webmaster:
What are your settings?
[HTC Sensation] Ace42:
Most of the time when both cores are on the 2nd isn't doing anything, because the first core isn't even pushed enough to reach max. So, I feel 1 core is sufficient, I'm running 4.1.x w/ 1 core @800 and the battery and speed are fine. Although I see others running speeds of 1.2 and higher, but I barely notice the difference of the freqs. The S3 is so fast that the higher clocks are overkill IMO.
[HTC Sensation] webmaster:
I suspect you see a noticeable difference in battery life then? Also, what method did you use to disable the second core?
[HTC Sensation] Chilled26:
Honestly I don't even touch the settings I just run at default.
[HTC Sensation] hev88:
Pretty snappy ;)

su

chmod 644 /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online

echo "0" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online

chmod 444 /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online

Someone in faux kernel forum was talking about doing this. Gscript app makes it easy to run script. If you dont like it just reboot and 2nd core is back on.
[HTC Sensation] webmaster:
I tried Faux's and it was ok, I plan on trying Bricked tomorrow. However if disabling a core gives even better results then that might be the way to go.
[HTC Sensation] Ace42:
echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online

I do see a difference in battery life, which is why I prefer this setup, when we have ICS I will use both cores. But I feel cheated on Ginger so I use 1 for now, and whoever said two cores has better batt is wrong...Logically two cores use twice the voltage, that means 1 cores will save a significant amount of power. A weak dual core w/ 1 core on will have bad life, but a fast on is different.
[HTC Sensation] webmaster:
Is that permanent or does it need to be run each time you reboot?
[HTC Sensation] Ace42:
Every boot, you can make a linux script(.sh) if you want, and then use script manager. But, I'm only testing this for comparison, I can't see the speed difference w/ 1 or 2 so I just use 1. 1 @800 core feels how fast my MT4G did when OC'd @1.4Ghz.
[HTC Sensation] webmaster:
How long have you been running like that?
[HTC Sensation] mattbutsko:
I run Faux kernel, Joe's RCU, undervolted -50mV and underclocked to 1Ghz, I can now easily make it through the day and I'm a moderate to heavy user. I'm pretty sure disabling the second core isn't necessary, and frankly, if you check out how little it's used, it probably wouldn't benefit that much anyhow.
[HTC Sensation] mrg02d:
Completely false. Just because something has voltage across it doesnt mean that it is doing anything. Voltage times current equal power. Using power uses the battery.

You guys need to SERIOUSLY change the way you make decisions. Just because something SEEMS logical to you, doesnt mean it is correct. I see alot of BAD info being pushed around here.

I have CM7 and run Fauxs kernels. I FORCE both CPUs online and run at 1.56Ghz. My standby is around 30mAH...Nuff said.

Something else is messed up. Chase facts, not fiction people.

Another issue? UVing. You guys break so many rules in electrical engineering that it isnt even funny. Ive explained things so many times that I am sick of it. I wont anymore, but will let you know that you have missed some key facts.

Matt
[HTC Sensation] Ace42:
So me having better life w/ 1 core is false? Even though I've compared it w/ 2? And I don't know what your problem is but keep it to yourself, I didn't force you to respond to my post, only sharing my experiences.

Almost 1 day, battery around 30 still. But I listened to music, internet, sync and played some games so my life was shorten.
[HTC Sensation] mrg02d:
I didnt say this. It is obvious what I said, so why would you even ask me? Just scroll up pal.

You didnt simply give an experience...You implied that your experience is LOGICAL. It may to you, but it is incorrect. Dont just throw things out there, please. It makes people with backgrounds in power and energy pissed off.

Also, my finding completely debuncts your theory. At night, while I sleep, I see 5mAH draw.

Matt
[HTC Sensation] Ace42:
Yes it makes sense to me so why does that bother you? And I never said power isn't drawn in sleep, i've own many android phones and I know power is takes in sleep but at a lesser amount. The phones enter a deep sleep mode and the CPU(s) go into a lower power state. So why are you telling me about your mah draw? Power is always drawn but what does that relate to me saying 2 cores vs 1? And I know 2 cores is power efficient and that's why we no longer use 1 cores in computers, but as you know async is bad in Ginger anyway. You make it seem like I stated it as a fact or something chill out.