yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Diewi:
Dear All,

please also check cpuspy before reporting and/or uploading any usage statistic. The device has a problem going to deep sleep. If you notice a larger drain open cpuspy, turn the screen off, wait ten seconds, turn the screen on, update the statistics. If the time for deep sleep doesn't increase, you'll have the bug of the device to not enter deep sleep any more. That drains a lot of battery. It can only be fixed through a reboot. Please report that. It's valuable information.

Also this is good for you not to hunt any ghosts ;-)

I didn't notice the bug in the stock software, but it has the Android OS bug that causes a quite high CPU usage.

Best is to use a .14 patched kernel. It fixes the Android OS problem. There will be a H2O kernel that fixes this. But for now there is the FM-kernel that also tackles this problem.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sherwink20:
am not particularly happy with my battery life as well..

went from 100% to 20% over the night within approximately 12 hours. 9 of which, I'm not doing anything since I'm sleeping.. (this is more or less the behavior at daytime as well.. something like 10% every 1.5 hours of almost doing nothing in the office - the good thing is, even when I'm using it, it still is using the same juice.. can't wait for CM9)

Why is the cell standby that high? upon backreading, it seems that none are getting this issue..

Would appreciate any inputs..

still loving my note :p
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Diewi:
This would be typical for the bug I described above your post.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] the red krawler:
The update to 2.3.6 massively boosted my battery life. From 12 hours to dead flat to:

... In fact I even leave bluetooth, GPS and Wifi (never sleep) on 100% of the time and still got this result.

Much happier chappy :D
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Tiamath99:
I noticed this also. The note consumes a lot more battery than any other cell I had over the years.

It seems that something is not right with these first firmwares.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] gn0s1s:
Do you have an app list, or is it pretty much the same as the SGS2?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] watch_mania:
Can you post your display details? 2.3.6 update indeed increases my battery life, albeit there are several background apps that I should disable first. However, there still very big difference whether you used the screen display or not.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Oneiricl:
After 2.3.6 update:

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/580/sc20111124064158.png

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/259/sc20111124064209.png

Am pretty happy with this kind of performance....

Brightness is at ~15%.

All autobrightness/auto power is off.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] disoxy:
Finally, after preventing many process from autorun by gemini app manager, turning off the mobile, wifi, closing all apps and freeing memory by the defaut task manager, my note eats only 2% battery after about 8 hours sleeping. But this is still wrose then my iphone4, it eats 0% after 8 hours sleeping, even with its 1-year-old battery. The checkin handoff and event log handoff were the first 2 listed in partial wakelocks. Is there anything to do for my note to reach the same deep sleeping as my old iphone4?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sibere:
Overnight with everything OFF I usually loose 2 to 3 % of battery and 1 or 2 more % with radio ON and data OFF. I had the same kind of battery drain with my previous android phone (HTC desire).

I think that this is pretty good and well within the standards on Android phones.

BTW battery drain on sby has nothing to do with how old the battery is ;)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Hussainally:
What about the app green power in the market?has anyone tried that?some say it helps?has anyone experience it?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] katinsh:
I have had realy awesome experiance. Plus 5-6 hours to battery life. I recommend.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] Przekret:
S5830XWKS9:

# autogenerated by buildinfo.sh
ro.build.id=GINGERBREAD
ro.build.display.id=GINGERBREAD.XWKS9
ro.build.version.incremental=XWKS9
ro.build.version.sdk=10
ro.build.version.codename=REL
ro.build.version.release=2.3.5
ro.build.date=Sat Oct 15 20:13:18 KST 2011
ro.build.date.utc=1318677198
ro.build.type=user
ro.build.user=root
ro.build.host=DELL130
ro.build.tags=release-keys
ro.product.brand=samsung
ro.product.model=GT-S5830
ro.product.name=GT-S5830
ro.product.device=GT-S5830
ro.product.board=GT-S5830
# ro.build.product is obsolete; use ro.product.device
ro.build.product=GT-S5830
ro.product.cpu.abi=armeabi
ro.product.manufacturer=samsung
ro.product.locale.language=en
ro.product.locale.region=GB
ro.wifi.channels=
ro.board.platform=msm7k
# Do not try to parse ro.build.description or .fingerprint
ro.build.description=GT-S5830-user 2.3.5 GINGERBREAD XWKS9 release-keys
ro.build.fingerprint=samsung/GT-S5830/GT-S5830:2.3.5/GINGERBREAD/XWKS9:user/release-keys
# Samsung Specific Properties
ro.build.PDA=S5830XWKS9
ro.build.hidden_ver=S5830XWKS9
ro.build.changelist=654989
ro.build.buildtag=
# end build properties

Download:

CSC: XEO

http://hotfile.com/dl/134111608/e27442a/GT-S5830_XEO_S5830XWKS9_S5830XWKS2_S5830XEOKP2.rar.html

CSC: XEF

http://hotfile.com/dl/134113839/5f13d30/GT-S5830_XEN_S5830XWKS9_S5830XENKS1_S5830XWKS2.rar.html

Pass: sampro.pl
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] alexnm:
We can't complain, we get a new rom almost every week :P

I'll try. I do hope it fixes something... Wifi, mostly.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] abhdr:
i hope so too =) i just installed XEO. rom. Looks good i haven't seen any wi-fi problem yet
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] enbima:
Installed XEO Rom without any problems. I could not get root, has anybody rooted this firmware?
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] kujtek:
xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1034145

try to follow instructions in D point
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] Fishlips:
It would be great if this one fixes the WIFI problem. Can someone confirm, please?
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] Newmak:
I installed this version in my phone, now How can I root it?. Can I do it with Super One click or like Android 2.3.4?
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] ingbrzy:
No, use root methode for 2.3.3/2.3.4/2.3.5....
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] evilxdeadly:
on some 2.3.5 working but on this not...
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] denclaud:
I used the method and its working perfectly
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] evilxdeadly:
Xen............?
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] zt3:
Are these ROMs official guys? Would like to try 'em! :)
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] LeonardoDeKenji:
Sometimes screen unlock lag, delay 1s :(
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] evilxdeadly:
its on all 2.3.* :(

ps.

http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/6072/img2425n.jpg
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] LeonardoDeKenji:
It's not true :cool: XXKPH 2.3.4 never lag when i unlock screen :D At the same free RAM, XXKPH unlock screen better than XWKS9 (i use "Pattern" to unlock)
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] evilxdeadly:
and how many delay you get on wakeup? :D

edit; the problem was on ics1.2 behradgh -> downgrade to this fw is giving for me unrootable with errors + i flashed 2.3.4 and got same errors, then formated all and reflashed this, then installed with stock recovery root and it works :D
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] riccardoro:
Guys this firmware is perfect (for me)

I have update from S5830XWKPY. Quadrant score is 998 (1008 with XWKPY), the system is very fast. With 2.3.5 battery seems to lasts longer.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] LeonardoDeKenji:
XXKPH 2.3.4 unlock screen suddenly :)
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] alexnm:
I don't know which problem you're talking about, but I don't think it fixes any of them.

I'm still unable to connect to my University's connection (wpa2-Enterprise, Eduroam), and I think Samsung is never going to fix it.

I'm so fed up with this problem... I won't buy any samsung mobile in the future, this is frustrating :mad:
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] Fishlips:
Well, I flashed my moms Ace to stock S5830XWKS2 recently, but she experiences random reboots on heavy wifi usage. I cleared cache and everything, but nothing helped.

So I was wondering if this was fixed now.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] devilsking:
I dont think so. Can u show us video about ur phone & XXKPH?
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] artur.r:
I had the same. With KS9 it's gone.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] chadalu:
Works Great
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] drvalianto:
This rom is smooth but short battery life. Good for gaming, though.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] Zecanilis:
I also tried it and i think the same thing.

One thing i saw new it's the default overscroll glow.

One bad thing it's the non working mass storage (without samasung drivers).

Went back to KPO. The best for me so far.

Cheers
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] drvalianto:
So you mean XWKPO(2.3.3) or XXKPO(2.3.5)?
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] Zecanilis:
XXKPO sorry! Deodex + CF-Root (with a2sd)

Cheers
[Galaxy Ace S5830 General] LeonardoDeKenji:
Why do you can say "dont think" ? Have you use XXKPH before ? :D

About me... Hm hm, i'm used to using XXKPH 3 months before using Cyanogenmod 7.1 :cool:

p/s: i haven't got the device to recording video, but i am sure
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Stigy:
Found this over on MoDaCo forums -- they have obtained temporary root on the Galaxy Nexus: 03 Nov r1: Superboot - rooting the Galaxy Nexus - Android @ MoDaCo
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] FISKER_Q:
Great news, but shouldn't we let the author post it if he wants to release it here?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Stigy:
I guess you are right -- probably should have put it in General Discussion and let author of this make his own thread for support.

I'll let the mods decide what they want to do with this.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] joshw0000:
The OP did link to the site instead of posting the download. I use XDA primarily and would have never found that link had someone not posted it. I don't see why the dev would be disgruntled.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] FISKER_Q:
Oh yeah, i don't think he'll mind at all.

More for purposes of keeping the forums a bit cleaner for when he does post here :P
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] spences10:
I don't see why this is a big deal, nexus devices have the ability to have the bootloader unlocked out of the box.

Simply 'oem unlock' download su and busybox from the market, job done.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Stigy:
I've never had a Nexus device before -- didn't know it was that easy.

You can download SU and busybox right from the market, install them and you have root access after a 'fastboot oem unlock'?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] FISKER_Q:
I may be wrong but while it is easy(Being that google considers these devices as developer platforms), it's not that easy.

Even with the bootloader unlocked, you won't be able to write to the relevant directories (as those require root permissions), and as such you still need root unlocked before you can install those from the market.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] matt2053:
Right its almost that simple though. The typical procedure is:

Fastboot OEM unlock

Fastboot flash recovery clockwork.img

Boot into recovery, flash superuser zip
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] _hyperdude:
Well technically you need the su binary installed before Superuser app is useful. You don't need root before you can install Superuser lol
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] FISKER_Q:
Yes, of course, i meant the actual installation of the su binary :)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] spences10:
Ah, think you may have a point there :D so actually what POB has done is enable root without CWMR [as you would need to flash the super user binary from recovery] which is quite handy thinking about it because it may be a while before someone manages to compile a compatible recovery

So I stand corrected, it is quite a big deal
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] RegnierD:
Yup. And the new SuperUser has the option to fully download and install the SU binary. So temp-root means super fast real root.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] matt2053:
Why is flashing a boot image preferable to flashing a recovery image?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Chirality:
I don't think it's flashing a boot image, I think it's just booting off that image which then modifies the system partition to include the su binary and the relevant changes. Then you restart and boot your regular boot image, but this time you've got the su binary.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] matt2053:
Understood, thanks.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] kidserious:
Yea, root access is only relevant when the phone is booted up. When in recovery, to write to any partition, root access is not needed and doesn't matter.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Chirality:
Hmm...it seems superboot is using a modified boot image from a dump of the GSM Galaxy Nexus. I guess this won't work with the LTE Galaxy Nexus?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] kidserious:
Hmm.....well, even if it won't, root won't be a problem. I guarantee koush will have a recovery for the VZW nexus on day 1.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] donsh00tmesanta:
So this means its not rootable like the nexus s? (ie fastboot oem unlock)?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Chirality:
No, you still need fastboot oem unlock to apply this rooting method if you get a Galaxy Nexus with locked bootloader. fastboot oem unlock gives you a unlocked bootloader, it doesn't give you root.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] donsh00tmesanta:
Thats what I meant, unlocking.

But since this is out that means a rom dump might occur???
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] blunden:
Some people already have rom dumps. They are not releasing them yet though.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] donsh00tmesanta:
I bet they are enjoying it right now
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] wobbu:
Quote from @CM_arcee:

Hmm... some exchanges on Twitter between him and Paul

@PaulOBrien:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Chirality:
The problem there is the first part of step 2. How do you pull the boot image when all you have is an unlocked bootloader? fastboot doesn't seem to have any function that does that. So you'll have to get it some other way, and it might be difficult to do without root.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] paulobrien:
How is this NOT appropriate for the development forum? Trigger happy...?

P
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] FISKER_Q:
Well it could be that the mods felt the same way as i did, that instead of having some random user posting about it, it would be better if the author did, especially since you're a frequent visitor.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] nsavani:
I installed the latest android sdk r14 so I can be ready to unlock the bootloader on the galaxy nexus. But I don't see fastboot anywhere as in previous versions of the ask? Anyone know where it went?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] _hyperdude:
It's under /tools - fastboot.exe (assuming you're using the Windows one). I'm guessing it's there in Mac and Linux ones.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] donsh00tmesanta:
So now the rom dump is out what does that mean? Sdk rims rendered obsolete ?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] duce102:
Anybody wanna post a mirror? Filesonic sucks.

Edit: nevermind. A moderator made a mistake by closing another thread. I thought this one had the stock recovery, stock boot, and system dump.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] pascanu:
My understanding is that "fastboot oem unlock" voids your warranty. Can we hope there will be a way to root it w/o voiding your warranty? Is it possible for other Nexus phones for example?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] FISKER_Q:
With the Nexus One, HTC said they would honor the warranty as long as the issue was not caused by unlocking it, i.e. if you bricked your phone because you flashed custom software on it.

Not sure about the Nexus S, or the Galaxy Nexus though, but if you find their position on the Nexus S, it's probably the same for the Galaxy Nexus.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] blunden:
They would have a really hard time denying warrenty for actual hardware failure in the EU. As far as I know it's mandated by law here. They could probably deny obvious cases of software bricking caused by the user though.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] FISKER_Q:
That's "Reklamation" and it's not warranty :)

They're also pretty good in Denmark at avoiding it when it comes to phones since arguing that the phone was damaged by moisture is so stupidly easy.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] blunden:
No, I'm pretty sure there are laws about the warrenty obligation too. To claim it was damaged by moisture they have to show that the moisture "sensor" has been affected. Sure, that can happen but they can't just claim that without proof.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] FISKER_Q:
There are laws of course, but a warranty is an extra service, and pretty much they decide how the "extra service" is handled.

Of course they can't lie about your device voiding warranty, or in the example i mention, lie about the repair after a "reklamation", but i doubt there's any law that prohibits them from removing their warranty, which is an extra service, if they say the device must not have an unlocked bootloader.

FYI, i was talking about reklamation and water damage, and the issue is that pretty much all devices will be positive for moisture, and in this case they're using that as an argument a device is not working, however unlikely it is.

If you take it to our government body responsible for these claims, they will basically accept this explanation with no questions asked, granted i don't believe anyone has actually tried going to court over it, so i can't say for sure that it will stay that way, but atleast now it's a blanket statement to deny any device, and it works.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] blunden:
Well, at least the seller is obligated to provide warranty for it for at least 2 years if bought within the EU. Perhaps not the manufacturer though. This is the reason the Nexus One had 2 years warranty in the EU instead of 1 year in the US.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] player911:
On the Nexus One, when you Unlocked it, it displayed a big ugly Unlocked Padlock when booting. With no way to "relock" it. I'm not sure if they ever fixed it but they quickly found ways to gain root without unlocking the bootloader.

Once you had root, you could download Rom Manager and install CWM.

I used the SD Card method, where you would pull out the SD card at a certain point and run a special code. It only worked on a specific Froyo version, but it was easy to flash an original update.zip, and upgrade to the version that it worked in.

I don't mind "unlocking" the bootlaoder but I don't want some huge ugly cosmetic icon I can't get rid of. Luckily my headphone jack went wacky and it was exchanged for another one and I went with the alternatives.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] AndyCr15:
It looks like this superboot doesn't work on UK retail units... :(
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] :
did you fastboot OEM unlock it?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Reviewers:
If you have a Galaxy Nexus dump your ROM for me & PM me it .
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] spences10:
Hi, if you can give guidelines on how to do one [I'd like to know] and I'll happily PM it to you :D
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Shodney:
Is this it?

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1351739
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] spences10:
I hope not =/ using dd scares the crap out of me >.<

Plus that command says su, I dont have su - thats what I'm trying to get on there
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Shodney:
Oh right...

I have no idea what dd is, so I'm probably not the best person to try it then :D
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] spences10:
This worked for me on my retail unit

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1352004
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] wilfredcool007:
hey guys....i'm developin a custom ROM.... so i would like to add some extra features to it..... i'm on official gingerbread DDKQ5.... and in the message settings there is no option to change the skin of the mess as it is in FROYO.... is der any means by which we can port or include this feature into KQ5..... :confused:

i've attached the mms file of froyo and ginger bread..... pls do the needfull.....
[Samsung Galaxy Fit GT 5670] rajrocks:
Dude i dont think so tell yet
[Galaxy S I9000 Accessories] arr0ww:
PSA: Momax X-Level 1700MAH @ Directmobile.ca $12.99

http://www.directmobile.ca/store/products/1029000526/BASAI9000XL/Momax/

I bought one from NCIX and priced matched it!!! Better than taking a chance with a fake from ebay
[Galaxy S I9000 Accessories] arr0ww:
Figured i'd reply to my own post.

I'm still on the first charge. I was at just over 22hrs of standby, 2hrs of on screen usage, 15 minutes voice calls, and some texts and emails sitting at 63% still. This would have brought my original battery down to about 30% at least!
[Galaxy S I9000 Accessories] peper0ni:
Can you tell me, how many days you could use the phone with one charge?
[Galaxy S I9000 Accessories] tomer555:
i bought 2 X momax 1700 battries hope it is good battries .

btw: what is the rom that you guys use that gives u the longest battery life?
[Galaxy S I9000 Accessories] arr0ww:
that depends on the usage, but i would say 2 days for me, with about 4+ hours of on screen time. Wifi +3g always on.
[Galaxy S I9000 Accessories] cristianandrei6:
In comparison with the normal battery how long does it make the battery life?
[Galaxy S I9000 Accessories] lusoul:
2 days here
[Galaxy S I9000 Accessories] lazuli22:
I'm also using this momax battery. very glad with lifetimer,about 2 and half days
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] ElAguila:
Is anybody else having issues with their ET going to sleep and you have to pull the battery to get it come back up? I thought it might have been my setcpu settings. So I cleared them and uninstalled it. I tried the midnight rom and the starburst rom. I tried the stable and exp LosKernel. None of these got rid of this issue for me. Randomly through out the day I can try to wake the phone up to use it and nothing happens. After a minute or two I have to pull the battery. I am currently testing the stock kernel.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] vikramjatt11:
Thats weird, the only time that happened to me was when i had setcpu, and i tried putting "screen off" value to 200/200.

You should install setcpu again, and make screen off value 500/500, and if you dont have the issue, then try making the value 200/500, if you dont have the issue at this value, then leave it as is.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] ElAguila:
I agree it is weird and I am not sure why it is happening. If it stays okay with the stock kernel then I may wipe and try the viperrom.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] lojak29:
Yep happened twice the other day... Im on stock rom with lost kernel..roooted i put setcpu to 200/1200 after waking my screen for a minute used google came back 3 min later and phone was either off or wouldnt wake .. I had to pull battery twice.

I setcpu up to 1200/1200 never happened again.

This is a nice phone but very touchy.. Seems alot weird things goin on for some Et users.

Worst of all for this phone is Los or just weak /radio signal in general ..which is a samsung issue.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] KCRic:
Why people still insist on screen off profiles amazes me. When you hit the power button to wake it - the phone is stuck at 200MHz, you do realize this? If snything else is going on while it's stuck at 200 or SetCPU doesn't sample the phones state fast enough, it never gets out of 200MHz and locks up. Just like any other processor does when you overload it.

All the background processes going on even when the screen is off and somebody thinks setting the CPU max to 200MHz is a good idea? That's just asking for it. Not to mention the screen off profile is known to cause this issue. Notice how Virtuous, Viper, Cyanogen, and many other developers don't use one in their native OC daemons? There's a reason why. The phone sleeps just fine without it, just let it do it's thing.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Overstew:
Don't use offscreen profiles (the kernel is smart enough) and avoid using task killers, as those are likely to be the second leading issue.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] ElAguila:
I am having the issue even with setcpu uninstalled. I still have not found out what is causing it.