yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General] kersh:
[YOUTUBE]GhovjaqEIrU[/YOUTUBE]

[YOUTUBE]mMyaYNLFs8c[/YOUTUBE]

[YOUTUBE]JRzOj8O3rXM[/YOUTUBE]

[YOUTUBE]TPiIzGkrVYc[/YOUTUBE]

[YOUTUBE]ABZmYbfXai4[/YOUTUBE]
[Droid Incredible Themes and Apps] Splash01:
do u use anti virus for your droid inc.?
[Droid Incredible Themes and Apps] Kiboe:
No
[Droid Incredible Themes and Apps] SFxBA:
I did at one time run Lookout and didn't have any issues with it. Since trying some many different loads I have gotten out of the habit of loading it. I found that really the only helpful thing it offered was scanning on app installs, but I am only downloading legitimate apps, so in theory I don't even need.

If it helps you sleep at night run it, but as long as you are smart about things just like you would be on a desktop type machine there is no need for it on a smartphone.

SFxBA
[Droid Incredible Themes and Apps] Splash01:
i used Lookout as well.
[Droid Incredible Themes and Apps] SynisterWolf:
i leave lookout on my phone for the find feature. i take public transportation like trains and buses so it makes me feel better if someone where to take it or if i leave it i can locate it. but thats the only reason why i use "anti virus"
[Droid Incredible Themes and Apps] TomCat4623:
Lookout

Sent from me
[Droid Incredible Themes and Apps] enomele:
Same, and having used it since it came out I can say it doesn't hog much battery. The added benefit of it scanning on app install isn't necessary but welcome I suppose. :p
[Droid Incredible Themes and Apps] cmlusco:
I have yet to see a virus on an android phone. Exploits yes, info stealing apps yes, virus no. I use "Wheres my droid" if i need to find my phone. You can make it ring even with it set to vibrate, you can get gps location, and remotley wipe the phone if needed, all by sending a text message with a configurable code word.
[Droid Incredible Themes and Apps] ffuser1:
you don't need antivirus software for your phone. it's all a gimmick
[Droid Incredible Themes and Apps] GRZLA:
Or you could just use Prey, you can remotely install it on your phone once it has been stolen/lost and it will send you the location of where it is at and you can even remotely wipe the data. All for free.

Here is a link to Prey's site.

http://preyproject.com/
[Droid Incredible Themes and Apps] jbcode42:
I do not use an AV on my phone. I generally practice safe computing habits the best I can. Read review, look at what permissions apps use, etc.

I have tested prey in the past though. It looks nice, but I never did end up reinstalling it after I flashed my last ROM.
[Droid Incredible Themes and Apps] killrhythm09:
This is the best approach imo. Some of my friends have asked me about using an AV but I usually just tell them it's not needed...
[Samsung Infuse 4G] ALBGunner04:
EDIT: Problem solved! New update was available, flashed it, everything working now!

Hi all,

I've Googled endlessly and haven't been able to find a solution to my problem. I've got a Rogers Infuse running CM7 from the dev thread. The issue is that I don't get any sound coming when I receive an SMS, or any other notification such as new e-mail on Gmail.

I do however have the ringtone working for the Phone and have the alarm working. The vibration for SMS also works.

What I'm wondering is how can I fix this so I can get the SMS notifications working?

I've tweaked with all settings, whether it's deleting all profiles, tweaking them, making sure night mode isn't on, going to the Cyanogenmod settings, etc. and none have helped.
[Samsung Infuse 4G] rboone18:
If it was un official one, there was updated cm7 released with it fixed happened on my last cm7 before update.
[Samsung Infuse 4G] ALBGunner04:
The issue here is that I'm flashed on the 27 October ROM (my first CM7 ROM).

Should I just reflash the ROM?
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] TMBS414688:
Can anyone post a step by step basis for changing auto brightness values, or send a link?

There are other people to that wanna know that I personally know, and that I've seen in the forums.

New to Android, love it however, I wanna learn how to use adb correctly and SDK and APK manager. I'am also posting this so that I can break the 10 posts so I could ask in the original thread.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1297920
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] indef:
My little backup phone has a smashed glass digitiser, which means the touch part of the screen no longer works.

The problem I have is that the phone is locked - but it's only a left-to-right swipe lock.

Is there any way to remove it? I've tried every hardware button combination I can think of with no joy.

For what it's worth, its a Huawei Ideos U8150.

I've got another digitiser on the way from Hong Kong, but it won't be here for another 10 days.
[Captivate Android Development] TRusselo:
they call me Mr. RogerRogers...

... Mr. Boombastic...

[YOUTUBE]6W5pq4bIzIw[/YOUTUBE]

well it took less than a week (48 hours 5 minutes) from my original request for it....

I must have done something right, so heres what I did:

I went to open source.samsung.com send the contact button in the upper right corner. filled in my name device info and the message read as follows:

then I came to xda and asked others to do the same, but I'm not sure if anyone did...

**the 41 devs was a made-up rough-estimate/ believable large number.

**and I lol'd about typing "attempt"

here is the email i received back from opensource.samsung.com:

and here is my multi-upload link.

http://www.multiupload.com/RIJ5376Q6H (127.47 MB)

snip from https://opensource.samsung.com/

i will be posting untouched to git-hub later this week with my other rogers sources. - DONE!!!

https://github.com/TRusselo
[Captivate Android Development] Reamer09:
Lucky Canadian bastards..... lol.

sent from my Pinnacle Powered Captivate
[Captivate Android Development] q659503934:
finally.....
[Captivate Android Development] toy028:
Is this the real thing?
[Captivate Android Development] low99:
I was like, YAY, GB SOURCE...

continues reading...

f*ck...
[Captivate Android Development] TRusselo:
{exploitative} what? have a valid explanation? i896 isnt a bad thing for i897
[Captivate Android Development] nightshack0:
Maybe because he read that it's from I896 (Rogers), but it's 100% the same hardware-wise as the I897 (AT&T)
[Captivate Android Development] Yuna:
Yeah. Hooray - we can now have voodoo color etc. on KJ3 rom :)
[Captivate Android Development] amtrakcn:
Will this work with KJ3 ramdisk?:D
[Captivate Android Development] TRusselo:
kj3 is 2.3.5

this is 2.3.3

not saying its not possible but not pre-defined.
[Captivate Android Development] low99:
^ nah, just overly excited meeting with disappointment :D no offense at all to the Canadians.
[Captivate Android Development] FlKTION:
Wow nice man, does this mean we might get BLN on our 896/897 roms?
[Captivate Android Development] xdadooder:
Will this help with the people who are hoping that auto-call recording will be developed for GB?
[Captivate Android Development] DAGr8:
well GB source means we can use this source code and push the intramfs of newer kernel and compatibility willbe 100% so kernel devs will work there magic form there ..

and the rest of the goodies just need to wait for the kernel devs to pull there magic

no nto at all , we need a gingerbread device that supports call recording the only one known to date is i9088 and its doubtfull it will ever receive a gingerbread update .
[Captivate Android Development] TRusselo:
13 downloads and 1 thanks... yay!
[Captivate Android Development] mrhaley30705:
Update, 2 thanks. But I wouldn't know what to do with it even if you packed instructions with it.
[Captivate Android Development] studacris:
Even if you cant use it personally, realize it helps the community and so spanky the thanky!
[Captivate Android Development] mrhaley30705:
Exactly,..
[Captivate Android Development] parnz:
How about audience chip in I897?

Is I896 has audience chip too?

thanks Mr.Rogers xD
[Captivate Android Development] FlKTION:
No it does not but from everything i have read most people seem to think it is useless anyways.
[Captivate Android Development] shane87:
Awesome!! Thanks a lot man! I could really use the unpack scripts for sgs. I need to update my talon build to jvx? I think, or whatever the new initrd version for i9000 is.

Again, a HUGE thanks for your help, and hopefully I can figure something out to get this thing booting.
[Captivate Android Development] Jsmokey:
Look back at my other post, information added. Just hit me up if you need anymore information to get the scripts working. Its fairly straight forward other than the exists one which gave me countless trouble till I finally just copied it into bin.

Oh and if you wouldn't mind giving the old thanks button a smack that'd be awesome if you found the information helpful. Hoping to break 200 by the new year. lol
[Captivate Android Development] shane87:
I finally got the stock initram extracted from the stock kernel. I ended up using the script from dsixda's kitchen. The first script would extract the kernel and everything, but it wouldn't pull the initram. As it turns out, the Rogers stock initram uses no compression. Hopefully I can get a working kernel now that I have the stock initrd, and the modules that are prebuilt.

Unfortunately, I will be out of town this weekend, but Monday I should have time to get a proper build and do some testing.
[Captivate Android Development] Yuna:
Okay. i am eager to test :)
[Captivate Android Development] shane87:
Well, after removing lagfix, and a full flash to stock i896 gb rom, I flashed my custom built stock kernel. Nothing. It hung at the I 896 screen and refused to move, regardless how long I waited.

So I looked back through the configs, and I can't find anything that would cause it. I thought that it may have been due to the uid/gid that are mapped to root. The stock config maps 0 to root for uid and gid. On talon, the i9000 kernel I run, the config maps 500 to root for uid/gid. So I changed that, and still no luck. Then I checked the default kernel command string, which seems to be in order as well.

So I am stumped, and I am not so sure on the initrd being the cause, since I am using exactly the same initrd as the stock kernel from kies. I am going to do some more poking as time allows, but, at least for now, I'm at a loss to explain it.
[Captivate Android Development] Wdustin1:
......dang lol thanks for putting in some time and work into it. It may be a lost cause comon already at&t
[Captivate Android Development] Illidine:
well，shall we have voodoo kernel and several costom roms now
[Captivate Android Development] bumbernut:
Does this contain the missing drivers to improve CM7 battery life ?
[Captivate Android Development] mrhaley30705:
Hopefully. Cause if it helps CM7, it helps MIUI.
[Captivate Android Development] stoobie-doo:
Am I interpreting the ROM naming correctly - doesn't JL1 imply this won't be released until December?
[Captivate Android Development] mrhaley30705:
JL1 is froyo.

KH2 is gingerbread.

J=2010 L=December 1= first build that month

K=2011 H= August 2= second build that month
[Captivate Android Development] tkienzle:
We can turn on hspa err what ever its call :) but I'm thinking that is on now with kj3...

Sent from innerspace on my hacked telly...
[Captivate Android Development] sremick:
What I see suggests differently. Majority of people dismissing it as useless seem to be trying to justify in their own minds the fact that they can't have it.

One of the reasons that people might think it's not as useful as it is is because that, without the hardware support, much of the voice processing instead has to be done in software (by the modem I believe). So while the end-result might be similar in some cases, you're putting more burden on software and CPU. It'd be much saner from a performance/battery standpoint to utilize the existing (and rather nice) hardware we have for this task, and offload this from the primary CPU. My Captivate bogs down enough as it is.
[Captivate Android Development] mrhaley30705:
HSDPA(download) has always been available on Captivate. HSUPA (upload) never has, and still isn't.
[Captivate Android Development] mattern1974:
The "useless" audience chip in my i897 Cappy is wonderful when activated with an AT&T stock derived rom.

Call quality is far superior than any i9000 based modem/rom I have used.
[Captivate Android Development] TRusselo:
first off without the hardware there is no software support, so happens that paragraph does not make sense. secondly this audience chip discussion its way too heated way too quickly and I believe it has more to do with usa canada rivalry then the actual phone. unless a cl kernel developer has something to say about this specific source I do not want any discussion about the audience chip in this thread.
[Captivate Android Development] boog:
Now I get to learn about source :)

Should be way different than the unpack/repack I have been doing.
[Captivate Android Development] stoobie-doo:
Thanks for that; I had in my head J was for 896, not the 897... need to keep to something simple, like Hex.
[Captivate Android Development] geokilla:
Let more ROM developing begin!
[Captivate Android Development] nbell13:
Pretty sure it is on cm7 with stock modem... i routinely get upload speeds in the range of 1.5 Mbps or higher :-D vs .2 or .3 with the KJ3 modem... This source is a very good thing... Hopefully CyanogenMod can put it to good use
[Captivate Android Development] Jirv311:
CM7 is not based on Samsung/AT&T source.....yet. :)
[Captivate Android Development] mrhaley30705:
What is the stock modem for CM7? I'm willing to bet it's an I9000 modem, which has HSUPA enabled.
[Captivate Android Development] :
Yeah it is.
[Captivate Android Development] 1tontomato:
Thanks TRusselo for doing the leg work of sending the emails to samsung and getting the source. Anyone that doesn't see this as a huge jump in development is blind.
[Captivate Android Development] TRusselo:
thank you for seeing!
[Captivate Android Development] nbell13:
I was thinking it was a Samsung Vibrant modem, since its called T959TLJL3
[Captivate Android Development] mrhaley30705:
Hey, TR, any chance you can convince then to let go of ICS source code? :D
[Captivate Android Development] FlKTION:
Definitely! I was so tired when this thread broke that I slipped on mentioning that. I have been praying the source would be dropped and every-time i visit XDA I always hoped to see a thread like this announcing it.

Bottom line, it was epic of you to go out of your way and hunt it down then report your findings. Most of us (including myself) just talk about it and hope for it, you got results and for that many people are going to a much better experience on there cappy's!
[Captivate Android Development] proper69:
thank you. I hope this makes all roms better. I currently use cm7 and the only reason is for better theming. I hope to see some nice roms out of the source code
[Captivate Android Development] stayintwisted:
thanks for the effort,, the more info available to the devs the better our phones so much appreciated
[Captivate Android Development] TRusselo:
someone owes me an awesome "Effin Kernel", lol.

not that anyone owes anyone anything on xda, but it would be ... well Effin Awesome!

-Effin Eh! Rom Dev.
[Captivate Android Development] erbsmokah:
Its ok the i896 has the same hardware as the i897, only the branding is different. If you open up an i896 its identical to the i897. People like to argue that its different but its not. Heck on my i896 if I take the battery out it says i897 on the identification sticker.
[Captivate Android Development] TRusselo:
yeah has the same FCC id as well. and research FCC ids.... but please no audience chip talk. as i stated before.
[Captivate Android Development] LNJ:
Same FCC ID. You can't recycle FCC IDs for different hardware!
[Captivate Android Development] TRusselo:
OP updated with exact time and message i used to obtain source and time of reply email. A MUST RE-READ .

I must have done something right.

vote to portal!
[Captivate Android Development] mbc663:
Is it really that simple or did u just get lucky? Has anyone even attempted to email for a kj source?

Sent from my Captivate with audience chip
[Captivate Android Development] studacris:
Rogers had officially released their gingerbread to the public. They HAVE to release the source within a certain amount of time.

Since all we have from at&t are leaks they are not obligated to publish source at all.
[Captivate Android Development] TRusselo:
source isnt created or released for leaked beta versions.

EDIT: damn beat to it. (give you some thanks, let u catch up! lol)
[Captivate Android Development] mbc663:
It slipped my mind for a second that Rogers officially released it. Thanks guys.
[Captivate Android Development] b0uncyfr0:
Finally...Voodoo colour.
[Captivate Android Development] boog:
I have the totally stock kernel compiling now. Had to fix one issue where it wouldn't compile.

If I make one work, then I might hand out a test :)

Thanks for letting us know about the source drop TRusselo.

I need new stuff to learn! lol
[Captivate Android Development] erbsmokah:
I would be willing to test. I have a backup captivate that i am willing to do just about anything to. Only problem is that it has no ear speaker or headphone jack. I busted my headphone jack in the phone so i removed the flex cable and hardware and i am currently waiting for the replacement part to arrive. If i have success on that phone i can flash my good phone and test more.
[Captivate Android Development] 4-2ndtwin:
Thanks boog !! U R the Man !! That is, along with "Mr. Boombastic" Errrr Uhhh, I mean TRusselo :D
[Captivate Android Development] gilpdawg:
This is good news. Me likey.
[Captivate Android Development] boog:
Thanks, I will probably just do a public test though.

Thanks, guys! But, so far I am just getting a non booting device on my tests. Might take me a bit to figure it all out, I might have to consult the experts, like existz (he has been a huge help to me so far on my other projects, and I really appreciate him!).
[Captivate Android Development] nkrick:
Can I ask if anyone has confirmed whether or not the i896 contains the second microphone that is required for "hardware voice cancellation" to work? It could be that the boards are identical but a microphone was left out. (there, I didn't mention the forbidden words at all!) ;)

Thanks for requesting the i896 source and then publishing the information TRusselo, I am sure the devs will give us all kinds of good things from it.
[Captivate Android Development] TRusselo:
considering we have kernel source for some of the older I 897 models and this new gingerbread source for the 896 we probly should be able to mash up noise cancellation. Topic over

EDIT: this is the first i heard of 2nd mic. thanks for new info. (for once on this topic)
[Captivate Android Development] LNJ:
The i897 doesn't have a second microphone!
[Captivate Android Development] erbsmokah:
It doesn't matter how many ways you prove people wrong... they will find another way to beat the dead horse. Poor thing.

Anyways, I'm looking forward to the kernels that drop from this source.. Though I gotta say.. the kernel dev's have done pretty well without it.

BTW its November now... Brace yourself for UCKK spam lol. Maybe AT&T will push a rom live one of these days. :P
[Captivate Android Development] mbc663:
It is exciting for us guys still on the captivate. Every week gives me another reason not to spend a couple hundred on an upgrade.

Sent from my Captivate running GB with a functioning audience chip.
[Captivate Android Development] parnz:
sorry for start talking about audience chip :(

Because he says

So I doubt it is i896 has audience chip too?, Then I just ask for 100% sure:(

I didn't take a quote from nightshack0 before asking my question, It lead people to miss understanding my purpose.

Really sorry MrRogers

I'd like to press thank button if you've the other one (in OP :D )
[Captivate Android Development] Wdustin1:
I figured once this hit everybody would be going nuts trying to implement it but I'm just not hearing much about it. Is anybody trying to use this or is 2.3.3 to old to be cared about

Currently Fusionized
[Captivate Android Development] popfan:
I know Boog is using this opportunity to learn more about have a source to do kernal develeopment. He may find out that he can incorporate some of the source code into the newer kernals to make them better, but there is a learning curve here so it may take a little bit.
[Captivate Android Development] TRusselo:
no 2.3 .3 is not too old. everything you ever wanted can be compiled into 2.3.5 colonel eventually. Go back and read the thread. It will take a while to compile kernel from source. have some patients. compiling a kernel from source and now being able to modify the values in it make it a lot harder to do. and a lot lot longer process. have patients

it's quiet in here because were busy working on it
[Captivate Android Development] boog:
I have been fighting with it, I think I am closer to getting a build that will at least boot. Then have to get it brought up to kj3 :)

Might be a bit for me, doing some cold weather camping with the scouts again this weekend. So, I will be away from my dev machine.
[Captivate Android Development] Wdustin1:
Lol I got plenty of patients I was just curious as to why it was so quiet now I know....shhhh.. let them work.

Currently Fusionized
[Captivate Android Development] studacris:
Lol patients are in a hospital.

Patience is the word you guys are looking for.
[Captivate Android Development] dalewest:
I blame autocorrect.
[Captivate Android Development] nkrick:
Sure it does. We know with 100% certainty that the i897 has an audience chip and the diagram from Audience shows that the A1026 needs two mics (http://www.audience.com/processors/a1026.php).

As far as location of the second mic, my guess is that it is the small round hole in the upper left under the grill covering the rear speaker. You need to remove the back plate to see it well.

Unfortunately, a teardown of a i896 would still be required because the presence of the "mic hole" does not confirm the presence of a mic behind the hole.

---------- Post added at 01:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:53 PM ----------

I only first thought of it the other day. I always assumed that the i896 was missing the Audience chip, but if the part numbers of the board are the same, that is highly unlikely. However, if the second mic was missing, the audience chip would essentially decide there is no background noise, thus there is nothing to cancel with an end result essentially the same as if the chip wasn't present at all (at least my guess is that is how it would happen).
[Captivate Android Development] erbsmokah:
Doesn't make sense financially to make two slightly different phones. All the part numbers are the same.. The FCC ID is the same.. How much longer are people going to kick this dead horses ass?
[Captivate Android Development] studacris:
They're already slightly different...

one says at&t the other just says Samsung...

Just sayin :p
[Captivate Android Development] TRusselo:
yea but like others have said to defend their point, other branded phones dont get different model numbers...

but also that round hole on the back is on ours (896) too but its not a mic. and not a reset button, (its not a calculator!)

i still go back to the OP and play the video every day. i love that song.
[Captivate Android Development] nkrick:
I am not saying that the i896 has or does not have audience noise cancellation. I just have an inquiring mind and would like to know for certain if it does.

As far a financially speaking, leaving a microphone out of the design saves money because it is a component that does not need to be purchased or installed. It does not require a redesign to leave the second microphone off the i896. Besides, you are making the assumption that companies always make decisions that make financial sense. If that were the case, the only Galaxy S phone would have been the i9000 and variations with different frequency/modem support and the Captivate, Fascinate, Vibrant, Epic, etc, would not have existed as different looking phones with different features.