yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Nexus S Themes and Apps] xmRipper:
I tried on NSCollab instead of Ultimate Crespo right now, then worked.
[Nexus S Themes and Apps] elinho:
Did you get it to work?

and for the notice, thank you everybody for helping us noobs out :)
[Nexus S Themes and Apps] mattallica76:
Conventional installation worked fine on Bugless Beast GPA19. So far it's working great without any FC's.
[Nexus S Themes and Apps] fergie716:
Here's a flashable if anyone needs it

http://db.tt/MuOblYFt
[Nexus S Themes and Apps] shane8002:
don't work
[Nexus S Themes and Apps] JakeOcn:
Replaced Vending.apk on /system/app/, made sure all files had same permission, reboot phone.. And Market was giving me force closes, I cleared data, fixed permissions everything working fine now
[Nexus S Themes and Apps] Braneless:
Thanks for this. Up and running without issues.

*Deleted vending.apk and marketupdater.apk from System/app.

*Renamed new market Vending.apk.

*Pasted in System/app.

*Set permissions.

*Rebooted.

This was in Brainmaster's Miui, but would be identical for most roms.
[Nexus S Themes and Apps] cadguy:
Updated from 3.1.6 to 3.3.1.1 magically without any input from me...
[Nexus S Themes and Apps] obsanity:
Just installed it right from the download. No problems. I'm on CM7.1

Sent from my Nexus S 4G
[Nexus S Themes and Apps] taronas:
Does the auto update actually work? I have it enabled for two days and nothing got updated so far. But looking in "My Apps" shows a bunch of pending updates...
[Acer Iconia A500] dlsinmd:
I just got the invisible sheild screen protector at best buy for $10, that's 20 off if anyone else is interested.

Nasapredator
[Acer Iconia A500] ybnormal70:
I just ordered one for store pickup. $10.89 with tax. That's not bad. Thanks for the heads up.

L8r,

Kevin
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] zenopzz:
I made another, here is my story.

I bought mine Oct 2nd so I was just a few days off the 30 day cut off. I went to AT&T and they said the only way I could upgrade is to return my phone today and be without a phone (or use old phone) until the 6th. I said that wasn't worth it and left. Later they called me and said they did some tweaking and will let me return and get the sky rocket on the 6th.

I can't decide if it is worth it, I will have to back up, unroot, stock rom, and then wait for root on skyrocket and wait for Zagg to make a screen protector.

All that for .3 bigger screen and a 1.5 ghz. No 4G LTE in my area.

What do you think? Is it worth it?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Kadin:
Personally I don't think its worth it. Even if LTE was in my area, I'd pass. I'm much happier with this screen vs. my Infuse.

Even if the exchange was an even swap, I can't say I'd do it to be perfectly honest.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] foxbat121:
If you are going to return current phone, you have to pay $30 restocking fee. The new LTE version will cost you $250 plus activation fee ($18). All in all you will have to pony up for around $100 extra for .3 inch of screen and SLOWER processor, not faster regardless of the clock speed, and LTE that you currently can't use.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Kadin:
Good points but the $18 would be a wash since it's an exchange.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] kornklown69:
I love how people speak out of their ass and call the processor that has yet to be announced and that they know nothing about slow
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] vl221:
No restocking fee for people that purchased on Amazon. Free return shipping also.

If Amazon sells the skyrocket, I can buy the skyrocket for full price and Amazon will credit the account back after they receive my SG2. Free 2 day shipping with no tax.

Just talked to them today.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] xAnimal5:
I know right? They need to hurry up and and announce the processor so these trolls stop trolling. :P
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] HTC Chris:
I just returned mine to Best Buy since my 30 return policy ends tomorrow. There was no restocking fee, I just have to wait 3 days for my upgrade to be returned.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] brent8577:
Oc to 1.5 And don't pay for 4g if u don't have it
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] jayosee:
The question is, why are they so willing to do some "tweaking" to trade out on this particular model? Why were they not selling the GS2 at local AT&T stores (here in california)? Maybe because they have an agenda to sell the skyrocket? I dont know, but it sure does sound suspicious.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] foxbat121:
I love how ppl speak out of their ass for something they have no clue about. Google Samsung Celox. It's not exactly unannounced product, only not for AT&T. I have seen reports from ppl who field tested this new AT&T LTE phone and confirmed the sluggishness of the 'new' processor.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Stevenrogers_420:
Keep what you got. Unless its got Exynos 1.5, only way its worth it for you...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] defnow:
I say try it...since they're giving you a extended return.Don't like it? Return it and get the GS2. Simple
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] xAnimal5:
100% agree. I have till OCT 7, so I'm gonna wait for others to buy it and report back. Pretty much of everything we know is SPECULATION, who knows.. it might be amazing.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] kornklown69:
When they field tested it im sure they were not field testing the final version....celox has been a "lochness monster" for months no...im sure there has been updates and improvements
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] jbsg02:
It's tempting for me cause I'm in an LTE market, but hspa+ speeds are generally good enough for everything I do mobile. The bigger screen will make it a little harder in one hand (I had the bigger sprint version of the GSII for a couple weeks), I think our screen is about the perfect size for a phone
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] pguillory08:
it's snapdragon.

it's the first LTE phone from AT&T, and they want the LTE speeds with that large screen to last through the day. snapdragon is a weaker processor that takes up less battery. so therefore, there you go.

my SGS2 is oc'd to 1.6ghz, and it flies through anything you throw at it. so if you have one, keep it. lol

i work there, so yeah.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Entropy512:
There is nothing about the 1.5 GHz Snapdragon that's unannounced. Yes, right now, it hasn't been officially announced that the 1.5 GHz is a Snappy - but the evidence all points that way. There are no 1.5 GHz Exynos chips, and Samsung reserves the Exynos for flagship devices like the I9100 and Galaxy Note - we should consider ourselves lucky the I777 got one. Everything about the Skyrocket looks identical to the T989 except for the LTE radio.

So far, across the world, Galaxy S II devices have had either:

1) A 1.2 GHz Exynos

2) A 1.0 GHz Tegra2 (in foreign "niche" markets) - actually these have been rumored but I am not sure if I have ever seen one

3) A 1.5 GHz Snapdragon (in "niche" markets like T-Mobile and also apparently AT&T LTE).

The chances of it being a 1.5 GHz Exynos are slim to none. The chances of it being a 1.5 GHz OMAP4 are slightly higher - but not a single report points this way, and the T989 points away from this too. All the evidence says that 1.5 GHz dual-core A9 on a Samsung = Qualcomm APQ8060.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] eddies92:
I agree with most people here. ASSUMING it's a snapdragon ( I don't know) the exynos runs circles around it. Look at the reviews between the tmobile sg2 and its siblings.

Touch wiz is not fully optimized for snapdragon. Something tells me samsung hasn't put to much effort on it.

LTE while awesome. Is a potential battery drainer if any experiences from phones on verizon hold true still. Honestly I love hspa+. its speeds are decent enough. Its a phone people... not a computer. Its a good balance of speed and battery consumption..

If indeed it turns out to be something other than a snapdragon then I suppose that would change the game a bit but I dont see paying 80 dollars extra when lte is only in like 5 markets. I'd hold off for two years and then get a better LTE phone when the LTE footprint will (hopefully) be mature(d)

Just my two cents..
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] ceo.mtcl:
:) why is every one getting so defensive? Let the phone come out. Everyone has different choices, you like gs2 good, very good. Someone else might prefer rocket. I returned mine gs2, I'll get HTC vivid and keep my eyes open for rocket in our forums. I think this was the best choice because, if anything, I'll have 30 days to get back to gs2.

And since I do business from best buy there is no restocking fee or any charge.

Coming from atrix, screen resolution and root matters to me so I've made my decision.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] DJSLINKARD:
Im keepin my GS2. I want the exynos and I feel like the dev support for this phone has been awesome so far and thats something worth sticking around for.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] owmygulay:
+1

Lots of good dev support. But are people going to start buying the sky rocket and gs2 support is about to drop off?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] quarlow:
People (users) may jump ship, people that either live in LTE coverage, or HAVE to have the "best". These LTE phones may look better on paper, but the consensus so far is that in practical use the GS II will outperform them both (with the only exception being data speed if you live in LTE coverage).

But I have yet to see ANY dev say they are leaving.

Sent from my Galaxy S II (i777)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] getbuzzin:
Same situation here, my 30 days ends tomorrow. Only difference is I went to best buy to get a price match, not a return. Got $80 back. Didn't even think twice about doing a return. This is an awesome phone running on unname v1.1.0. Happy with what I got.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] vl221:
Is anyone actually jumping ship over to HTC Vivid?

What are the perks HTC Vivid has over SG2 or Skyrocket?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] AndroidAnime:
This forum is hilarious. I stumbled upon it trying to find out information about the newly announced skyrocket.

I come from a life of to-go phones, and around a month or so ago I finally decided to get myself a nice high end phone and figured out how great an android phone would be.

To the point, I can not believe how many butt hurt OG GS2 users have been shamelessly whining all over this forum for the past few days. It's clear they're worried their phones are about to become obsolete (not at all saying they are), and puffing their chest out as much as they can about their OG GS2 being far superior to the skyrocket and going to have the best dev support, etc. The OG GS2 is an absolutely awesome phone, I've had some hands on time with it and really liked it, but personally I'd like a bit more real estate, it felt much too narrow for me and the 4.5 inch screens I played with felt perfect. I live in an LTE market as well. As for the processor, I really could not care less. From what I've come from, this phone is going to be more kick ass than I'm probably even expecting it to be. Let the dam phone be released and tested out before you whine about its inferiority. It simply may be the better choice for some people, as it will be for me.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] kytrauma:
all of you guys that are planning on returning your gs2 to get the sky rocket I sure hope you didn't buy from Att. If you did and don't like it your stuck with it because Att only allows one exchange. I'm not going to return a phone I know I love for one that I haven't even seen.

http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/legal/return-policy.jsp

Read the beginning of the third paragraph.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] defnow:
Find the right csr or manager and that 1 return policy is BS. I've exchanged and played with almost every device offered by at&t. So give that "limited exchange" a rest.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] dirtbagg:
Ftw
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] kornklown69:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1319484

Here is the Rogers version alas it tis a qualcomm chip but that doesnt change my mind i want it lol
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Misterjunky:
Best Comparision

Here is the most accurate comparison you will be able to get between

the Samsung i777 SGS2 and the Samsung SGS2 LTE.

You can check it out here: http://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=4124&idPhone2=4130

Pay special attention when comparing dimensions and weight.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] RockRatt:
That's probably the most accurate I have seen other than it list the OG SGS2 having a FM radio still and the oic of the Ltd version is of the i9100? or something with the center home button.

Sent From My KICKASS CM7 AT&T SGS2
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Synner12:
Couldn't agree more. Although I do understand the sentiment. People don't like the prospect of spending so much money only to find out they might not have got "the best". So we will argue about details that most end users couldn't care less about in an attempt to demonstrate that either we're smart or someone else is dumb.

You see similar arguments in the MMORGP gaming world. People spend so much time researching character builds, asking people to look them over to look for flaws, and reading site after site after site. Then they finally choose and if ANYTHING negative about their choice is brought up after the fact, they launch into tirades trying to defend their choice, which really never needed defending in the first place. Here, people will blow through every single rom/mod available in every combination possible seeking the same sort of justifications. In the mobile world, much like the MMO world, these things come down to what works for you. There is no such thing as "perfect", as defined by the masses. The best you can do is line up the things that are important to you and find the best fit. Trying to tell someone else what phone is best for them is no different than shoving your religion down someone's throat.

Discussion is awesome...condemnation of choices that don't affect you in the least is idiotic, to say the least.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] jjesusfreak01:
Clear example of cognitive dissonance, if any of y'all were wondering what that particular term means.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Product F(RED):
Forget the Skyrocket; it has an inferior processor (same as the one in the T-Mobile GSII). Exynos is WAY ahead of Snapdragon and I know because I have the Evo 3D and the GSII, and the 3D has the same processor that's going into the Skyrocket.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] bkeaver:
in looking at the specs the sky rocket has a slightly bigger screen and has a slightly bigger processor and has fm radio... other than that they are the same. Same pixels, same memory, storage, ect....

IMO these are 2 really good phones and oh I left out the big difference which really wont matter to 90% of the population for awhile and that's the LTE bands. Att won't be rolling this out to all areas in neck breaking speeds just because its started releasing their LTE phones. In all honesty i really dont look for it to hit my area for another year+.

I am personally awaiting the quad-core processor phones that are rumored to hit the market next year. :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] poofyhairguy:
They are not the same.

The regular SGS2 has a WAY better CPU. You are right, Qualcomms are bigger (not faster) so they suck more juice.

The regular SGS2 has a WAY better GPU. Like almost twice as good. Not even in the same category GPU-wise.

Finally the regular SGS2 has a WAY better DSP. Our SGS2 can play full 1080p mkv Blu Ray rips out of the box. My friend's Evo3D can't even play my 720p mkvs. It is night and day difference.

Finally the regular AT&T SGS2 is almost exactly like the international version which means ICS faster and overall better ROMs (MIUI).
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Product F(RED):
I have both the 3D and Sprint GSII and you're 100% right. DO NOT GET THE SKYROCKET IF YOU VALUE PERFORMANCE AND UPDATES. Seriously, it's a HUGE downgrade. The LTE ain't worth it, especially with no coverage and huge battery drainage.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] djkinetic:
Here's My Take on the whole Skyrocket vs SGS II debate.

If you live in an LTE market I can see the reason for wanting to make the switch. That being said my personal opinion is that regardless the phone is not worth the swap if you have an SGS II. Also if I were deciding between getting the SGS II and skyrocket, I'd still choose the SGS II. Here are my reasons.

1. Yes LTE is fast, but if you're not in a LTE market you aren't going to be getting LTE speeds, you'll be on good old HSPA+ with HSPA+ speeds. makes sense but some people don't realize this. Also there will surely be better phones with LTE out later this year when AT&Ts rollout is more extensive.

2. Processor - Only confirmed spec is dual core 1.5 We don't know if its Exynos Snap Dragon OMAP or Tegra. That being said its highly unlikely a new Exynos CPU is in the Skyrocket, possible but unlikely. OMAP and Tegras are possibilities but chances are good Samsung won't use either. More likely its a Snap Dragon due to the fact the phone is carrying the Qualcom LTE chipset also the TMO variant of the SGS II has a 1.5 Dual Snap Dragon, it will be a bit slower then the 1.2 Exynos. Thats why users on TMO feel their SGS's are sluggish so to speak. Fact is Exynos > Snap Dragon.

3. Screen - yes the Skyrocket as a .3 display bigger, well unfortunately its the same resolution as the SGS II which translates into less PPI (pixels per inch) meaning blurrier text. Case in point again compare the TMO to the ATT and you will see a difference in clarity of screens when viewing the 2 side by side. Its a matter of preference do you want more screen space with slightly worse text, or a crisper screen with less space..i prefer a clearer screen (I've had the Atrix and the screen on the SGS II is so refreshing to use).

4. Memory - yes the Skyrocket has 1.3gb ram... the SGS II has 1 gb. yes the Skyrocket is suppose to have dual channel... but unless you are running bandwidth intensive apps, you're not gonna be missing out.

5. This is the big one folks DEV Support. The SGS II has immense DEV support. Why? Because our version nearly mirrors almost identically the international version. This translates in so much more customization/optimization of our devices. I can load CM 7 or MIUI anytime I want..or flash a debloated stock rom and OC if i want. I know that we will have an ICS port long before ATT gets us an update. All this is possible because of an established DEV community based on the international version. Thank god ATT got this phone right by sticking with the international version as a base. Now I realize this might not matter to everyone but if you dont mod or customize your phone why the hell are you on XDA in the first place... I've had the Atrix for the past few months and the community was all but dead until the BL was unlocked, which thank god it was. If you want to see how you're dev experience will probably be with the Skyrocket, take a peak at the T989 forums. Point is I love the options I have with the SGS II and would never go back to a device where dev support is difficult to come by or non existant and you as XDA members shouldnt either.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] vuoflfan:
for what its worth..I just came back from my local AT&T store...I have a friend that works there, we keep up on new roms and new phones....He said

the processor thats coming in the rocket is the exynos....and 4.5" screen with 800 x480 screen. 1.3g ram
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] bkeaver:
You misses my point 100% yes they are the same in every way except for the differences I already pointed out. Same screen Res, same camera and video, same memory same features except different processor, bigger screen, lte, ect.

Never did I say better processor

And yes I said same Res but never said better display. Look at the comparison on phonearena.com between these 2 phones. If those specs are correct they have more in common than differences.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Entropy512:
Even a few hardware differences can make a massive difference in terms of dev support - just look at the Infuse. More hardware commonality to other devices than the Skyrocket will have, but still, nearly every developer there got frustrated with being AT&T's ***** for updates. Rogers Gingerbread kinda tided people over - but it was a crippled crap release and Rogers never released an update afterwards.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] tylerdurdin:
Same resolution on this device is not a good thing ......bigger screen ....same resolution? That's a downgrade.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] bkeaver:
Very true.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Dungeon47:
To a point, but look at iPhone users. Higher res screen, but it's 3.5" I call that a downgrade.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] quarlow:
Every time I pick up my wife's iPhone I am reminded of this, and I say "Never again", but that is referring to many things about the phone besides the small screen.

Sent from my Galaxy S II (i777)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Entropy512:
Also to note - if it has as many similarities to the T989 as it looks like it will, Heimdall won't talk to it, only the absolute latest and greatest Odin.

This makes the phone a developer's nightmare - especially for kernel hackers.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] djarpit:
Im gonna go to the store and.play with the phone before making.my decision
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] ceo.mtcl:
I'm gonna laugh at every rocket 'hater' if all these speculations against it are false. Lol
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] david032766:
Same here and the vivid as well
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] RockRatt:
Here you go

http://www.theverge.com/2011/11/3/2535251/samsung-galaxy-s-ii-skyrocket-pictures-hands-on-att-lte

Sent From My KICKASS CM7 AT&T SGS2
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] planoman:
Yes, but the skyrocket will still blow your phone way way out of the water in all things data in an LTE area. Sorry, your processor cannot help you there...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] planoman:
Wait until Monday when the comparisons of the phones hit you tube and they show the speedtest app test for both phones in an LTE area. I predict an increase in sgsII returns!

All the processor talk will go by by.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Entropy512:
No it won't... An LTE radio does nothing but eat battery and make the phone fat for 95%+ of this country.

Hell - I'll be lucky to see HSPA+ service where I live before my next upgrade cycle ends.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Product F(RED):
Wow...the chasis is basically from the Sprint version but thicker.