yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] mastercipo:
This two are the classic example of noobs not reading the OP. I wish I have a dumbo button.

Do not use this if you dont know how to operate this rom, this rom is not intended for noobs.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] manu1991:
^^ Did you read the OP?

I am talking about the synchro bug comment.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] nitinvaid:
It is eating battery very fast

Mine was 60% at night and in morning the device is switched off due to low battery
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] codeworkx:
This post is 200% useless.

Log or it didn't happen.

Screenshot of OS Monitor ordered by CPU usage from highest to lowest.

Or ouput of "top"-command on adb shell.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Shaglok:
I thought a lot before posting that here. I know is not the right place to post CM's bug, but I consider this one a bit different. Is a bug present in Samsung's firmware that codeworks used as base and wanted to be sure he knows that.

I'm sorry if itsn't the right place (as I said I am not sure too), but anyway I'd prefer not to be insulted for trying to help.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] codeworkx:
cyanogenmod is built from sources, not based on any samsung rom!

we're NO COOKS, we're developers!

we're just using some precompiled drivers.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] jasspreet:
@codeworkx...if its not based on manufacturers' rom den we r facing pushmail bug here also in cm7???
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] codeworkx:
kernel bug?

baseband firmware bug?

ril bug?

there are a lot of possibilities.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Rewolution:
Hi,

First, sorry for my bad english. I have the same problem on my device. I think but not sure that the cause is the wifi :

- with wifi on i my device switch off in approximately 12 hours.

- with wifi off, after something like one day, i've 60% battery left

My logcat is also full of error from wifi, i've don't have them on one other device with cyanogenmod. I've also, read on this forum that some users have problem with the wifi on stock rom, so maybe a bad drivers?

More : (sorry, i've less than 8 posts, i cannot post link)

- logcat : dl.dropbox . com/u/47933778/I9003/logcat.txt (lot of wifi stuff but wifi was enabled one or two minutes only before the logcat)

- two screen-shot of os monitor (but don't see anything interesting here) :

dl.dropbox . com/u/47933778/I9003/screenshot-1320689499028.png

dl.dropbox . com/u/47933778/I9003/screenshot-1320689507989.png

- top output : dl.dropbox . com/u/47933778/I9003/top.txt

I will try to leave wifi enabled and see what appens. Will update my post later.

Edit : dl.dropbox . com/u/47933778/I9003/screenshot-1320735497245.png Here we can see that with the wifi on, the power consumption is higher.

Thank.

Rewo
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] theskull89:
hi all. at first big thanx to codeworks for his awesome work on this device

one thing to say - just to say- the portable wifi is not working is show -error- (not asking to fix) :D
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Rewolution:
Hi, you don't asking for fix, so what is the purpose of this message? If you create a message saying that an error has happened, give some information. Developpers are not god, they can not fix anything without information/log.

Without any log, your message is just useless, more, it "hides" useful messages.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] :
Hi people i want to try cm7 but can someone post the screenshots of how does it look and if i install this rom will all my data be deleted ?

and does everything like games and all work ?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] rbobot:
All data will be deleted.

Complete review here - http://www.androidgalaxy.net/cyanogenmod-7-detailed-review/
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] falex007:
all questions you should ask here
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vivekanandrc:
hey guys samsung released the official update of gingerbread for india 30 minutes ago.

India I9003XWKPG/I9003ODDKPG

cooolllll
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] jamsori:
And this has 'what' to do with CM7?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] shriom_manerker:
it was released 2 days ago ! now just get out of this thread ! it has NOTHING to do with cyanogenmod 7 development ! dont b that stupid !
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Lordrdx666:
Mods kindly clean up the thread appropriately.. Thanks

Tapashocked :) via my gt-I9003 with a random keyboard of my choice ! :D
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] k4mik4z:
No news no updates what about all those guys who gave their deionized accounts to code?

Has everyone given up already?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] blondbread:
As long as there's no official statement I'd say: Patience is a virtue. ;)
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] cmax24:
But only codeworks is working at this project??
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Unkalo:
Code is back tomorrow! The hope and the illusion is back!

Enviado desde mi GT-I9003 usando Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] neojith:
hope code returns to us..
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] codeworkx:
yeah, really hope he does!

Actually i'm trying to find some sourcecode.

Texas Instruments (TI)

omap3

liboverlay

version: 25INC4.4-P3
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] shriom_manerker:
http://focus.ti.com/general/docs/wt...ateId=6123&navigationId=12837&contentId=52605

i just found the infro of the hardware and the block diagram.. it doesnt sem helpful but since ur the dev i just thought of posting it
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] yamchirobe:
Looks like code really likes our phone he said he won't be back until the 14th, but is back on the 13th
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Unkalo:
Thanks code for to be still working in our device.

PD: Nice detail:

Enviado desde mi GT-I9003 usando Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] kartiksrireddy:
lol.. good come back man! ;)
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Erahgon:
Thanks! Although, he's looking for the source code rather than the hardware diagram.

Edit: ICS Source code released yet? Or are they waiting till later?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] codeworkx:
ICS sources will be released when ICS is available for the Nexus S.

Maybe in mid or end of december.

They did some changes to the HAL which means that proprietary files can't be used any longer.

This means that we have to opensource nearly everything before we can think about ICS.

And because i've not enough time and experience to do so, you'll end up with gingerbread.

Work doesn't finish itself.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Erahgon:
Indeed! We'll appreciate anything you'll give us Codeworkx! Been using CM7 nightly ever since you released nightly 25/10/11. It's been more smoother and feature loaded than any of the stock ROMs, and although not completed and stable, I've chosen to stay with it.

As for ICS... Let's see how it goes and how we can make it happen, if at all. But that's another flavor for another time! :D

Here's an updated review for nightly 5/11/11-2 if you so care (has no logs though... srry!): http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=19318664&postcount=130
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] nitinvaid:
Today is 14 and waiting for update
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] neojith:
Tarun, dnt rush it bro..
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Unkalo:
what are you saying? Stupid comment... I also I have this day marked on the calendar, but I don't demand any update
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] codeworkx:
have fun on waiting.

i'm still doing a break and after this i'll maybe work on camera again.

It might take some month to make real progress.

So don't expect any update.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] shriom_manerker:
welcome back codeworx,gud luck in your work.

no problem :) we can wait :) i'm learning bout kernel and compiling kernel ! i'll help u in future since i have some knowledge in c programming .. hopefully ..

@tarunagg - please BE PATIENT ! how many ppl should tel u this now ? btw sakindia is porting oxygen rom. go troubble him for a while ! beware he'll bite u :p
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] siasarrr:
Coderworks i see a lot of people are expect in the post and cant help to you because dont are ready to have a log with adb.

Can you help to use adb, if more user can get logs its better for the cyanogen support- I think?¿ Thanks for all
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] neojith:
google it.. i saw an entire thread dedicated to adb in droidforums..
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] codeworkx:
http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j...t-zAAw&usg=AFQjCNFxELBSQy-CMtTeICSL76nEMLEqRg

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=502010

Maybe we should start with "How to use google to find what you're searching for" ???

90% of all questions on xda are duplicates. and they're created because people are lazy or don't know how to use the search function.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] nitinvaid:
Leave the camera and work on other things like vibrater dspmanager and 3d performance so that we can use the rom on daily purpose
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] codeworkx:
3d performance = not possible

audio = not possible, will take month

vibrator = already did, but don't know what's wrong with the amplifer

kkthxbye
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vishal24387:
tarang let him do what he want. We should not distract his concentration.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] amit864:
ICS code is released. AOSP sync will be available soon. I guess it's almost time to say good-bye to codeworkx. Any ideas if anyone (from the devs who got dropbox access from code) would be working towards CM7?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Misledz:
What? I don't exactly get what your talking about. Sure ICS would be out but then it would be easier once it's out for specified handsets. Unless you wanna start working on a source code similar to XXKP7 that was entirely bugged out and utterly un-usable. Also there's no use trying to port over a half gingerbread half ICS based system, that's just being a mad scientist with a ticking bomb for a phone unfit for daily usage.

The only reason CM7 is taking too long is because this device's hardware hasn't been worked on by previous developer's, all this time we were based on the software part of the phone and find work around's over the phones hardware never messing with **** we didn't know, code's doing the opposite here, Heck we didn't even know the important of omap3/stagefright/opencore compatibility issues until code had mentioned them.

This reminds me of religious people who constantly ask "When's Jesus coming? today? tomorrow? Today's the 4th he didn't come" -.- Now really, ever heard of patience is virtue?

<golfclap>

Well done code, well done.

</golfclap>
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] neojith:
ICS source released..
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] neojith:
http://www.phonearena.com/news/Honeycomb-and-Ice-Cream-Sandwich-source-code-released-early_id23768
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] neojith:
So as code mentioned, CM7 might get delayed.. Sh#t..
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] akashsgpgi:
atleast codeworkx can release the current version he is working on
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] ganeshbiyer:
And after flashing it, start complaining that this not working that is creating a problem.

The I9003 lot is a real impatient lot.:(
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] maverickts:
Codeworkx: a new company called Verzo has released its phone named Kinzo with Ti	Omap 3630 chipset with sgx530 gpu, 5 mp camera, vga front camera etc..ie almost same specs as ours. I think you should request for their source!
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] YvanDF:
People too impatient should send 20 mails per day to samsung instead of harassing xda developpers, indeed ;)

This reply just to tell Codeworkx there's a lot of people waiting quietly, like myself, who understand one man can't create a world in 2 days.

Thanks for time you spend on it Codeworkx.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] neojith:
Akash, it aint easy.. Lots more to do.. He's working almost all alone in the project.. How much can a single man do?? Lets hope he comes back with support of more developers from CM team..
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] yamchirobe:
People if you are desperate, please bug Samsung on twitter and Facebook to give ics to our phone
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] codeworkx:
There will be no CM Devs helping on this because no one will buy this phone. ;-)

This phone is old. The Nexus S isn't more expensive than the I9003, so why should someone buy a I9003?

That's the way you should go!
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] alex88510:
If a phone released by Feb 2011 is consider old, then I9000 which released by Jun 2010 will be categorized as an antique now...

The only reason I buy this phone if compare to I9000 or I9010 or Nexus is, it's using super clear LCD.

Just some comment which I think I should say it. No offense.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] codeworkx:
the slcd is crap compared to the samoled.

the i9003 is basically a i9000 if you look at the specs so both are mid 2010.

and this is old for a smartphone. ;-)

no dualcore, no 1024mb ram, no 8MP cam, no led flash, no nfc ....

dunno if ICS will run very well on 512mb ram.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] alex88510:
this is how samsung promote their product.

A SuperAMOLED with color over saturated problem and they still able to promote them as a unique style of the product. Genius!

And there is still one problem with it, doesn't know how to describe it but I see it with my own eyes by comparing 2 type of screen side by side.

Anyway, I am appreciate your help with our "crap" phone and put this product problem topic aside, I don't want any argue.

After the ICS source code fully release, you will be concentrate on them right? after that, will you come back and help us?:confused:
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] codeworkx:
I'm owning I9000, I9003 and I9100. Samoled, SLCD, Samoled+.

In Februar 2011 i had a HTC Desire HD with LCD Display.

Mid of the year i got a LG Optimus 2X with Nova Display.

Samoled is better than LCD!

Sure, the stock samsung settings aren't very well, but we can tweak it.

And i prefer a real black over a light grey. :-P

ICS is released since yesterday, so i'm back on I9100 now for a long time.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] codeworkxx:
@codeworkx

pls stop being complete asshole.

the fact that you know a little more c++ than anybody else doesnt put you in position to insult and troll other people. stop showing everybody how awesome you are, what a good programmer you are! people know that already.

majority of people tend to be "noobs", they want everything right here and right now without any effort. they come here just to dl and flash stuff in evening after work, not to develop. they are consumers. but thats ok, thats harsh truth of life. this apllies not only to forums, this happens in everyday life. i can't believe that you didnt know this fact.

you cant insult people just because they are like that. it's like insulting rain or snow or wind.

you dont like i9003, you think its old and crappy phone. you regret agreeing to help and buying it (for other peoples money remember) - fine. then maybe you shouldnt take this work in the first place? you have nobody to blame, just yourself.

pls either quit whining/trolling/abusing people and start working (in exchange for a free phone), or gtfo

kkthxbye ;)
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Unkalo:
I haven't enough money to buy a nexus s or a s2, I would like. But my phone company gave me in May a i9003 for 49 € and paying € 19 each month as voice and data rate, and as it's a decent offer and support me, I accepted. This is the reason why I have a i9003, and now that people like you help us in all of you can, are good news for me, and means hope and that I can enjoy some of my phone. Thanks for all and sorry for my english.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] neojith:
As the android police states, " Cyanogen mod devs are out there rolling updates for phones that have even been forgotten by their manufacturers ".. Compared to some phones ruing CM7, we aint that bad..

Are u toying with us noobs, code?? Being a senior at college?? :D Let me torment these complaining noobs.. ;):D

Anyways, enjoy your work with CM9.. And come back.. The gt-i9003 needs CM7(may be the CM9, if u can help it :p)..
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] yamchirobe:
I'm sick of this forum, why can't people understand, our phone is a mid range phone, the i9000 was a flagship, nexus s costEd 10k more when you ppl bought this phone, lets be honest we bought this phone because of the price and not because LCD is better than amoled, everyone knows that amoled is better, guys please stop crying because our phone does not have roms, its just a fcking firmware, you still got the apps to kill time with.

P.s development is never easy,cm for i9000 became stable only recently, even the legendary Droid x suffered bad developmenT initially.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Bewinxed:
Da Fuq

@yamichirobe kudos to you man!

i thought this was a thread for Cyanogen on i9003, not a "which phone/screen/whatever is better" Derp

The comparison between i9000 and i9003, and the superiority of the i9000 has been discussed SO MUCH that it has become just RIDICULOUS to even discuss it D:

the phone sucks in comparison, but itself is quite decent, and has a good price to go with it! and we're stuck with it ok? not everyone has the resources to buy a phone each day, we have the phone, we have people working on it, we're happy, so everyone who post discouraging comments can either Contribute or GTFO D:

I mean seriously, this what happens to someone who volunteers to do something to you for FREE?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] amit864:
thanks code. Hope you put cranium on i9003, and enjoy the 40 hrs of battery life.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] yamchirobe:
Dude you seriously need to get a life, your scolding a person who willingly is trying to help you,remember even he is a normal guy working at Siemens and has a family, he is taking his time off and working for you and you are now scolding him, remember code is one of the most respected developers for the i9x00
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vishal24387:
Now the real game has started :D:D:D ....!!! Those people who just come & download stuff here & go away, they deserve this....!!! And I am dam sure that when we donate phone to Doomlord now, then again lazy people will beg him for development free of cost.

This thread need to be heavily clened.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] ganeshbiyer:
This thread need to be password protected:D:D
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] codeworkx:
Who actually is the real troll?

Who's balls are so little that he is not able to post with his real nickname?

Go away and come back if you got real balls!

That was in the very past. This was true for the first android phone HTC Dream or the HTC Hero because there was full sources available from google.

But time has changed. Manufacturers are modifiying android very hard today and so it's harder for us to get things working.

I think CM will drop a lot of devices with ICS if the manufacturers are not going to support us.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] neojith:
so we got one more thing to fight for now.. Guys, samsung shud hav some official representative in xda.. Lets bug them in everyway to provide support for CM team to develop for i9xxx.. Kinda like what sony ericsson did..

Code, we might be starters here in xda.. But we are fighters.. i9003 wil not die.. Its d poor man's high end android… :-P

Sent from my GT-I9003 !!
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] akashsgpgi:
codeworkx thank you for working on our device and sparing your valuable time
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] kartiksrireddy:
@code: do ur best bro. :) good luck!
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] malungkot:
You are very cool and very patience man ;), you are getting stronger with this kind of messages..

Please, Keep it up.. God Bless you! ;)
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vishal24387:
If codeworkx permit me then I will request to mod to temperorily close this thread to stop useless posts.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Misledz:
I think I understand why the vibration amplifier doesn't work, usually under Sound there is an option to control the Vibration Intensity amplification in the stock, But on CM7 I never got to see this option, There's only Haptic feedback tweaks. I looked under sound hoping to find this option but it wasn't there.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] malungkot:
I guess he have the power to do so.. he is a recognized developer.. he can close and open his thread/forum.. ;) ( just a guess :D )
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] codeworkx:
It's not as simply as this. ;-)

If i can trust the kernel debug messages, i've enabled the amplifer using a custom vibrator implementation.

But it doesn't make any difference if its enabled or not.

So there must be something else to twiddle with.

EDIT:

We've started looking at the ICS sources and tried to build for GT-I9100.

We're totally fuct. :-(
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] bubwet:
lots of problems? even for the I9100?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] amit864:
Yay!!, now sgs2 is also a crap phone. Work with our device code, atleast it's cheap. :D
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Misledz:
Well I've always wondered why the option was etched out, I thought it wasn't implemented for a reason, I tried looking at the CM7 on the I5500 Galaxy 5 and they had a vibration option so I was kind of on edge about it, But anyways, thanks for clearing it out code :) Too bad to vibration isn't that strong that I don't know even if a woman would find pleasure with such vibration levels LOL -.- Can't feel it in my pocket but the sound is crazy loud :D So it's somewhat OK :P
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] codeworkx:
nope, sgs2 is a very powerful phone with crappy audio drivers. ;-)
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] jamsori:
Heh, have fun on the sgs2 :)
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] amit864:
good phone with crappy audio eh? enuff said :D
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Erahgon:
He said crappy audio *drivers*, like the I9000 had when it first came out, until the voodoo guys decided to do something about it!

On the other hand, how's that audio hardware - DAC? I'm guessing it's not the Wolfson DAC, but is it as good or better?

C'mon peeps, stop being so condescending and let code go about his work!
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] maverickts:
Yeah s 2 has Yamaha audio or something. .considered to be inferior to wolfson dac
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] manrock:
i'm in

Looking forward to deep diving into the pending issues this weekend.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] manrock:
Looks like my notebook is no good when it comes to building android
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] waleedq:
i've been working on fixing the camera for about 1 week trying to debug and know what is causing the camera to stop working after closing and opening it several times, today i found that the issue is from the kernel it self , i tried the kernel on a stock rom and the camera just did the same behavior

the kernel used in CM7 Port is this one made by codeworkx http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1311983

it seems there a bug or some misconfiguration

i tried the kernel that was made by Skin1980 and it did work on the stock image and the camera didn't crash, but i couldn't boot CM7 using this kernel, i've been searching for the sourcecode for Skin1980 kernel but i couldn't find anything, any body can help me finding the sourcecode maybe i can give it another try
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] amit864:
Nice find. Pm skin.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] XDA_Bam:
This probably has to do with the fact that Skin used a stock kernel, and codeworkx compiled his own.

@codeworkx: Can / will you update the kernel sources to the recent CHN_update1 ?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] waleedq:
hmm so skin just used the precompiled stock kernel and didn't compile his own kernel from the sources?

does the CHN_update1 differs from the other update1 sources ? is it newer or it's just regions matter? i will check out today and see if it will work.

thank you.

---------- Post added at 12:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:53 AM ----------

i've just PMed him now i hope that we can find the solution and fix the camera, so we can move to the other bugs and have a stable CM :D, if we fixed these issues i think ICS is not too far form now :D
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Sp8ky:
wow if you guys fix the camera, it would be the best thing ever

my galaxy sl would be complete
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] francesco9482:
What are you saying?????? code said a lot of time that for official cm support he had to build up an open source kernel! Nothing related to stock kernel! He could have fixed camera as you're trying to do but this is not accepted by cm team!!!!so if you want to do such thing please open another thread and call it UNOFFICIAL cm7 port. From my side I'm not interested in it

Inviato dal mio GT-I9003 usando Tapatalk