yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] R1ptide:
I don't trust any kernel that isn't based off of stock pulled at this point. I have social hub, media hub, and all the drm apps frozen. I think I have the odexed nociq mod but that might've gone away when I had to revert to a nandroid backup not sure. Don't use a live wallpaper.. That's about all I can think of really. Every phone is different so we could have the exact same setup and get different scores.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] ilostmypistons:
Are you serious?

If you are press home and power at the same time
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Will of fire:
I got this
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] stangdriverdoug:
This is the best I can do...

Samsung Galaxy S II
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] cordell12:
Not to bad!
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] R1ptide:
trying to break 7800
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] lse4:
How do ya get your ram so high? Does launchers slow the phones down? I'm running the lostkernel
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] R1ptide:
I use the stock kernel and stock launcher so I don't know really
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] JoeBruin32:
Jeez, I can't much higher than 5900 at 1600min/max mhz, performance gov, calk rom, lost kernal.. it looks like my CPU float-point and integer are crap compared to you guys
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] frifox:
I got the same setup... 1.6GHz max, performance gov, calkulin's rom, lost kernel 1.0.0.8. got similar score in 5900 range. then I flashed zedomax 6.02, same story... something in calkulin's rom isnt liking our overclocking.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] R1ptide:
try the pulled kernel and tegrak
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] JoeBruin32:
Are you recommending chris' stock pulled repacked with cwm, or his eg30plus?

edit: not even breaking 5400 on stock + tegrak @ 1.452 :P
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] R1ptide:
stock pulled repacked with cwm,

try 1.72 :p
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Robbzilla:
I didn't know that either. Thanks!

---------- Post added at 02:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:33 PM ----------

Where's the Lance Armstrong ROM when you need it? We need to take the title from that French guy!
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] JoeBruin32:
hrm, I have tegrak ultimate, but it only lets me oc to 1.452?
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] R1ptide:
go to optimization
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] -viperboy-:
Did we really start a thread about who's phones e-penis is bigger?? *sigh*
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] chris41g:
It has its own script to control of at different battery levels
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] MrAndroid12:
On a stock Galaxy S II (1.2GHz) what is the battery life like when using 3G HSPDA (7.2mbps)?

And also gaming like Gameloft HD games?

thanks,
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] teiglin:
I only ran stock for about a day, so I can't give much of an estimate for that, but I get about 5-6 hours of screen on time, and easily two days of light use. I'm currently running HyperDroid with a mild undervolt and no overclock, but I assume it would be pretty similar for any Samsung-based ROM with bloat removed. As for 3D games, I can drain the battery completely in about 3.5 hours (Dungeon Hunter 2, Eternal Legacy). I wasn't able to undervolt my gpu stably though; that would probably help a bit.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] MrAndroid12:
hummm, maybe an extended battery will do the job.......
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] BryanNL:
I think its better for you to have a spare battery.

On stock, and doing all you said, I couldn't get more then 10+hrs. (absolute max.)
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ithehappy:
It's Display On time what matters. As long as you are getting 5-6 hours of it you are absolutely fine. Standby time doesn't matter.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zking:
I am fullday on 3G HSPDA battery life is maximum 14hrs...I use whatsapp alot so my battery goes more on display almost 50%. I have Samsung Vibrant too and on 3G HSDPA there is no chance anyone can get more than 15 hrs.
[HD2 Android NAND Development] prisonking101:
ICS Dump 1#

http://www.multiupload.com/CBK1W558VX

System Apps: http://www.mydroidfiles.com/downloads/ICS_Apps_Dump.zip

Sounds and stuff: http://www.androidpolice.com/2011/1...dwich-audio-files-including-brand-new-alarms/

more coming soon, also i am looking for devs to help port it to HD2
[HD2 Android NAND Development] prisonking101:
Ice cream sandwhich rom for hd2

System Rom:

Magldr Signed: http://www.multiupload.com/PBNZPJGZ2S

Non signed: http://www.multiupload.com/0X9FPZ5P7W

Courtesy of: the|gamer

Original Thread:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1315481
[HD2 Android NAND Development] mexicandroid:
Have you tested any of the system apps?
[HD2 Android NAND Development] ph03n!x:
Has anyone tried the APKs like GMail or Browser on Gingerbread (AOSP, CM or Sense)?
[HD2 Android NAND Development] mexicandroid:
I have Hard Droid 2 CM7 and tried to install then but must of them say there is a problem phrasing package except for like maps I think, or one or two other apps already available in Gingerbread
[HD2 Android NAND Development] daedric:
Why do we need two threads on the same forum about the same topic where the files on topic 1 are the same on topic 2 and the data on topic 1 is much more detailed than topic 2?
[HD2 Android NAND Development] ph03n!x:
I'm following that thread too, for an ICS ROM. But I wanted to ask if anyone was successful in deodexing these .apks, and successfully got them to work in Gingerbread 2.3.x based ROMs...
[HD2 Android NAND Development] prisonking101:
yes, most of them do not work yet. also if anyone knows how to convert a recovery.zip to a system.img it would be easy for me to make a MAGLDR SD build of it. thanks :)
[HD2 Android NAND Development] prisonking101:
Proper rom coming soon! :d

I am almost finished building a proper HD2 ICS Magldr SD build.. i need some peoples help to test it
[HD2 Android NAND Development] the_mouse:
I some how dont think testers will be in sort supply :)
[HD2 Android NAND Development] prisonking101:
yeah, I still need more, I only have about 15 testers at the moment, I could do with more :D
[Galaxy Tab General] manekineko:
Samsung Italy has announced which devices they are planning on upgrading to Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich.

That list is:

Source:

http://www.eurodroid.com/2011/10/28/report-samsung-italy-confirms-galaxy-s-ii-android-4-0-update/

This is absolutely ridiculous. Our tablet came out in November of last year. It's less than a year old, and Samsung is dropping us already despite being a member of Google's so-called Update Alliance.

Guess Samsung hasn't changed at all from the old days.

If this pisses you off like it pisses me off, maybe we can shame them if we complain enough on their Facebook and Twitter pages, I already did:

http://www.facebook.com/SamsungUSA#!/SamsungUSA?sk=wall

https://www.facebook.com/SamsungMobile?sk=wall

http://twitter.com/#!/SamsungMobileUS

http://twitter.com/#!/Samsungtweets

In the end, if Samsung drops us like yesterday's garbage, at least we still have our great devs here, like we always have.
[Galaxy Tab General] goughymachine:
I feel very lucky to have the developers!
[Galaxy Tab General] manekineko:
Updated the post with the Samsung Facebook and Twitter feeds that I complained on.
[Galaxy Tab General] bongski55:
With Samsung's "galaxy this and galaxy that" devices with different hardware specs you cannot expect the samsung team to come up with updates to each and everyone of them. That is a big nightmare.

As for me I will never again make a mistake in buying a samsung device. Support for an expensive device from samsung really sucks!:mad::mad::mad:

And to discover later that the device is not really up to quality and seems "untested" thoroughly adds to the disappointment. Example is the warming of the GT after some time of using. I have to mention that after using a rival tablet(I won't mention the brand) no similar warming happened .
[Galaxy Tab General] omr911:
Complain here too:

https://www.facebook.com/SamsungMobile?sk=wall
[Galaxy Tab General] bongski55:
Expect your complaint to be deleted asap!
[Galaxy Tab General] eongab:
it is expected that galaxy tab 7 wont have it. don't worry a port is coming soon.
[Galaxy Tab General] manekineko:
Thanks, added it to the original post.
[Galaxy Tab General] msgfromside3:
I would be just happy with sammy providing a official rom for the latest gb. I am asking even ics.

So I recently started thinking a lot about the fragmentation and it is whole mess. Everyone not just google is to blame. I will hardly consider getting android again until this gets resolved some way.
[Galaxy Tab General] droid512:
Can't we just get the damn drivers and source code... I trust the Dev community way more than any mfg

Sent from my rooted Nexus1
[Galaxy Tab General] msgfromside3:
If we can get the driver source code, we should be able to build ics for tab, just like almost any modem computer can run linux...
[Galaxy Tab General] phearus:
After the official Gingerbread update for the GT-P1000 I am kind-of glad that Samsung are not touching the ol' 7".

I too prefer to put my faith in the development community. Look at Technomancer's CM7 port. That ROM really kicks some ass.

Opensource FTW!!!
[Galaxy Tab General] ruina_84:
We know that the Galaxy Tab is a powerful device as much as other devices that has been upgrade coming soon. This movement isn't good for Samsung because everybody will not trust in them. I think they have the best hardware in the market, but actually there are other companies that have work too hard, as Sony Ericsson.
[Galaxy Tab General] olyloh6696:
shame on samsung
[Galaxy Tab General] frake:
Just tested alpha2 of the first ics port - no network for data yet, but smooth feeling on p1000 - glad I bought that one ;-)
[Galaxy Tab General] olyloh6696:
Nice! I will try it soon.
[Galaxy Tab General] hardeep:
Used the Galaxy Tab P1000 before... changed to EVO3D (Asian edition cannot be hacked)... regret it to the max... who the hell wants to unlock the bootloaders from htcdev.com and void their warranty.. .definitely not me...

HTC, nice build quality, but really for a 1.2GHz dual core, it still kind of laggy... probably my hacked out Tab P1000 works much smoother... plus, with all the hacking and flashing and bricking my device TWICE, still manage to get warranty repairs by Samsung...

had the EVO3D for only 2 months.. just got rid of it and bought the shiny new Galaxy Tab Plus... this dual core tab really kicks some ass... and manage to root it easily...

multi tasking on the fly.. do you see the bar at the bottom, click on it and easy access to mini apps over your current running apps.... Nice...

I am never a brand fanboy, been using HTC since like forever, but the increasing "LOCKED" bootloaders philosophy by HTC is getting on my nerves... they forget, many gadget freaks are buying Android phones for their "customization and being open source"...

at time being, will stick to Samsung, and will put my faith on XDA developers to bring this device to the next level... long live XDA Developers...
[Galaxy Tab General] para76:
Who needs samsung when you have a bunch of cool devs on XDA ;)
[Galaxy Tab General] DenimTornado:
Samsung did not release even 2.3 for Russia..This is funny to wait ICS)
[Galaxy Tab General] agc93:
Same here. Never had a Gingerbread update here in Australia (but that's my carrier's fault, I think) so jumped straight to Overcome and haven't looked back, apart from the odd dabble in CM7 and a quick run with Honeycomb.

I'm more than happy to wait for the devs to release an ICS build which will probably end up better than anything Samsung could've done anyway.
[Galaxy Tab General] NeoTechni:
Samsung agreed to a year and a half of updates. So yes, we should be able to expect it
[Galaxy Tab General] cpgeek:
I have an open support question open with samsung over this, and though I do believe you, do you happen to have any references to this effect that I can point samsung to?

Thanks
[Galaxy Tab General] agc93:
Sorry, but no, they never ended up committing to that universally. The update agreement is not required, it's part of negotiations with Google, and since Samsung never negotiated a universal guarantee on updates, there is no requirement for Samsung to update this device. In fact, I don't think they have obligations on any of the Tab line devices.

As much as we hoped they would, the fact of the matter is that Samsung has confirmed that there will be NO ICS update for the original 7" Galaxy Tab line, so no you can't expect an official update from them.
[Galaxy Tab General] BeauGiles:
Telstra did launch Gingerbread for the GT-P1000T; months after the Samsung release, but a release nonetheless.

http://ausdroid.net/2011/10/21/tels...msung-galaxy-tab-we-told-you-about-weeks-ago/

(Vodafone AU haven't released an update yet)
[Galaxy Tab General] ultramag69:
Mate, Telstra are the worst for releasing firmware updates...

I'm still waiting for an update from a previous phone I had that I was "guaranteed was in the works" from a Telstra rep, both in the shop and from the website....

You can expect updates from Vodaphone and Optus long before Telstra get their finger out of their butt and start on an update...

Suppose you can be that lazy when you have the majority of the infrastructure.
[Galaxy Tab General] cpgeek:
I contacted samsung technical support with this message:

I am a happy owner of a Samsung Galaxy Tab 7. It is a phenomenal multifunction device, however, I have started to see news that the this very expensive device that I purchased less than a year ago won''t get updated to android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich). Could someone at Samsung please verify that these claims are incorrect and put me at ease that Samsung will in fact (eventually) release a version of Ice Cream Sandwich for the original tab?

And recieved the following in response:

Thank you for your inqury. We understand that you're having confusion whether the tablet will get the icecream sandwich or not.

We apologize for any confusion.

However, we are unable to speculate when/if a software revision with this feature might be available due to the fact that this might lead to inaccurate information and confusion.

Should this be available, it will be posted in our website or you will be informed by your service provider. Please feel free to check with us periodically for updates.

Thank you for your understanding and patience.

Sincerely,

Carlo Technical Support

Which im interpreting as "anywhere between tomorow and never, wait and see"

How incredibly annoying
[Galaxy Tab General] Justin^Tan:
If I'm not mistaken its a statement from Google, not from Samsung, CMIIW. who knows if google push samsung enough, they will eventually release an update.

Pioneers who jump on board making the tab 7 original a success should be given a "better" treatment from samsung >.<
[Galaxy Tab General] agc93:
Remember that an ICS update for our Tabs would be a pretty big undertaking. Trying to get ICS to run on aging single-core device which is no longer part of their lineup would be a tricky thing. Plus, if they have limited resources they, like every business would prefer to expend those resources on their newer, more supported and more popular devices with more future potential.

Oh, and I'm actually running my P1000T on Optus so there is no update there despite the fact they claimed that one was close in April. Damn you Optus, and thank you Honeycomb Alpha/Overcome.

And you're partially right Justin: that deal is a manufacturer one (with Google) but manufacturers have no obligation to enter into one, and absolutely NO reason/obligation to enforce it retroactively.
[Galaxy Tab General] goughymachine:
considering how incredibly well ics is running on my galaxy s i think it will run very well on our tabs once the developers have it all running. It is easily my daily on my s with everything I can think of working, even a2dp to my Bluetooth car unit.
[Galaxy Tab General] redikx:
Most of us use home made roms anyway so not a big deal whether Samsung will give it us or no. It is known that they are doing good stuff but customer services is terrible
[Galaxy Tab General] Ragin69er:
I'm impressed they updated it to gingerbread! I would rather have the dev's do the heavy lifting though, the fact that the ICS port is working maybe two weeks after the source dropped is beyond impressive! I hope Technomancer brings CM9 our way.
[Galaxy Tab General] conchchowder:
Yeah. Considering the SGT is a GS...just in a bigger package.
[Galaxy Tab General] olyloh6696:
I hate it when people say this..

True, we will be using custom ROMs, but its always better nonetheless to get a base ROM and kernel source for devs to work and tweak the ROM.

Otherwise of we are using ports from other devices, we won't have the official best kernel source to work with for the best battery/performance combination
[Galaxy Tab General] markgamber:
Just a couple notes...I don't use any kind of custom system, ever. Period. And I'm none the worse for wear because of it. Being a developer, the last thing I care about is whether or not my apps run on Uncle Steve's Almost Stable Kind Of System With Root Whether You Want It Or Not. Second....isn't this just a repeat of the same "Galaxy Tab not getting Gingerbread from Samsung" thread, complete with "technical reasons" it wouldn't work even if Samsung wanted to do it and empassioned condemnations of Samsung, that we can now almost all read on our stock Gingerbread updated Galaxy Tab devices? I mean seriously, this is kind of laughable.
[Galaxy Tab General] rangercaptain:
This tab does everything I want it to - what could ICS do for me? Having the latest and greatest isn't important. Having a fast, reliable tool matters. Anything else is just lipstick and mascara.
[Galaxy Tab General] coopaclown:
Stock ROMS, simply put, are delightfully easy.

I understand that updating all of their devices to the newest OS would probably hurt their new products, but it would also increase the sale of their current products... products they don't need to spend development dollars on. I don't know, it just seems like they're not the most customer supportive company.
[Galaxy Tab General] agc93:
Not quite. The difference this time is that Samsung never ruled out Gingerbread. They indicated it might take time, and they even suggested it mightn't come to every model, but they never fully ruled out the update. Honeycomb was a closer case to what you're saying, but in that case, we never did get a 3.x update. The last, and most crucial, difference is that this time, Samsung has said that there will NOT be an update. There's your speculation gone. So, no, it's not really "laughable", but simply logical.

Also, for the others in the thread you really can't condemn a company as big as Samsung for focussing mainly on products they currently sell and support. I've never had a problem with Samsung Customer Service, and there comes a point at which updates will be more trouble to them than it could be worth, and since our device isn't even sold anymore, that time is probably here.
[Galaxy Tab General] StarLog:
SO when your current SGT breaks and cannot be fixed, what are your next options, because no one makes a 7" that supports Cell service, that I know of.

Loving my SGT, and will really have heartache if it breaks.
[Galaxy Tab General] cpgeek:
I suppose thr most logical replacement would be the Samsung galaxy tab 7 plus 3g on att or 4g on T-Mobile. Neither support GSM voice, however if you port your number to Google voice you can use voip to place and accept calls just like if it had cell service only typically with better quality and less expense assuming you mostly call us numbers.
[Galaxy Tab General] cpgeek:
Though I completely agree that this attitude is entirely reasonable and logical, the main reasons I'm personally looking forward to upgrade when a good stable ICS rom is released are mostly application support. There are quite a few apps and widgets that are currently being soley developed for tablet devices using the honeycomb sdk, and I'm guessing once ics gains mainstream acceptance, the ics sdk. Which will give developers easier access to the underlaying hardware making their jobs easier to build things that look right on a tablet.

As it is, though perfectly functional, gingerbread is a telephone operating system through and through. It is capable of running comfortably on tablets, however, there are quite a few gingerbread applications that look just plain silly (due to being designed for phones) on larger devices like the SGT7.

I am very much looking forward to things like the multi-pane layout view for apps like gmail, settings, and youtube to take better advantage of the display real estate and such, and also the honeycomb (and especially ics) sdks are designed to display "the right layout / ui" for whatever your device is based upon it's specifications (resolution, dpi, cellular, cameras).

Does gingerbread work fine? absolutely, I'm honestly quite happy with it, I'm using it right now. Does gingerbread have shortcomings (specifically layout determination issues) on tablet devices, and have improvements been made in the latest versions of android, absolutely! Will there be pleanty of applications in the comming year that are honeycomb or ics only? All signs point to yes as it's easier to write for ui wise, there are many more good features that average apps will be taking advantage of on the backend, and evolutionarily it's a decent step forward.

I'm happy with my tab, currently running overcome with adw. It's pretty snappy, does what it needs to, and overall it's a pretty good experence, but there are always newer os's with more features that i'd like to have.
[Galaxy Tab General] cpgeek:
There is "working" and then there is working. The devs in the ICS thread are doing an AMAZING job and I too am quite impressed with the way things are going, I follow it a little bit every day, and do my best to contribute what little I'm able to the effort (which I honestly wish was more), but it's still clearly a work in progress and FAR from being a daily rom due to the lack of implementation of a number of vital features, and even many of the things that ARE working are flakey. I have no doubt that the development of a stable rom will happen by these guys in a few months, but it's not anywhere close to being ready. As I said elsewhere, as soon as the guys from the ics thread get a decent base system set up that has drivers that work for all of the hardware features, then it'll be time for the cyanogen and or overcome guys to work it over, re-inject it with the features and tweaks that people have come to know and love from those various rom makers, some lenghty testing, and then we'll have some decent stable roms. From what I'm seeing as far as progress, I guestimate that it'll be at least late feb/early march before we see something that comes close to a daily stable ics rom.