yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Xperia Play Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ff7fan4eva:
Nope, and that in a way is the problem for me, i'm constantly expecting something bad to happen but it hasn't and the battery lasts for ages.
[Xperia Play Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] HearthC0re:
Just ordered the exact same one but from the german Ebay site.

Will arrive in 8-13 days.. Will give feedback :)
[Xperia Play Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] CZroe:
Could you try the Otterbox without the battery cover and tell me if it would fit the thicker battery? Perhaps with the rubbery skin cut under the black shell? I can't because I filed off the clips that attach elsewhere. I basically want to buy a second stock battery door and cut a rectangle in it and, if needed, the rubber for the extended battery to extend into the Otterbox Commuter. I wouldn't want to go without the battery door entirely because it wouldn't route the audio correctly and there is also a gap between the camera and flash which water and other contaminates can freely enter.
[Xperia Play Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Erikwithafro:
So I got the battery about 4 days ago and it's great so far! The added thickness is actually quite awesome. Anyone looking to get some great battery life for cheap should pick up one of these bad boys! If you're all about aesthetic and how your phone LOOKS, well that just shouldn't matter haha.
[Xperia Play Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ff7fan4eva:
Your welcome :)
[Xperia Play Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] HearthC0re:
Have gotten the same one a week ago.. and i dunno if it's just me, but the battery feels like my 2600 mAh right now ._.

Maybe it's just the starting affinity..
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] sfoksn:
Hey guys, so I flashed stock + root file from here http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=18768317#post18768317

I downloaded AntTek Program Manager (free freezing application), and now I have just finished processes that I think are useless.

These are the programs I froze:

WiFi sharing manager,

Yahoo! Finance

Sprint Zone

Sprint ID

Social Hub

Media Hub

AccuWeather.com

Android Live Wallpapers

Kies Air

Kiew via WiFi

Live Wallpaper Picker

Microbes

N.O.V.A. 2 HD

NASCAR

Ocean weather

SNSAccountLi

SNSAccountTw

SNSAccountFb

Sprint Mobile Wallet

Sprint Music Plus

Sprint Radio

Sprint TV & Movies

Swype

Talk

WIndy weather

WiFi Sharing

System Updates

Should I have not frozen any of these applications? I don't use any of them...

Also, have I forgotten any high battery consuming apps that will help me get better battery life?

Thanks in advance, everyone.
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dimokaktepa:
Good time .Today buddy brought his EVO 4G stacks problem.

When I press SWITCH lights Saver EVO, then the screen is black and four time vibratsiya.Screen is black, not on what does not respond.:confused:

If I plug it in this state to a computer, it is defined as

divays of download mode.When I press volume down buttons and the power button of comes in boot, trying to active rekavari - Phone reboots

four times the vibration and again a black screen.

If someone is aware of how I can pick up the divays?

Thenk you in advance for any information
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] {ParanoiA}:
Umm hard 2 understand u but u should try 2 run a ruu

Sent From My Pocket
[LG Revolution] holla420:
ok i need to know how to go back to stock rom that the LG revolution came w/it.If someone can help me out on that i appreciated?
[LG Revolution] mtmichaelson:
Use the zv6 tot in lgnspt and you are good to go!
[LG Revolution] bhp117:
heres a link for to downgrade to v4 or revert it back to v6

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1211295

and here's the link to the stock v4/v6 tot file

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1120062

it'll take around 15min for the process of reverting your revo back to stock so wait till LGNST says complete before you unplug the phone

and try to unroot it before you reinstall the stock firmware
[LG Revolution] holla420:
Thank u everyone for responding to my post and I'm back stocked. :)
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Joshuax8:
Hello everybody,

I'm trying to get CIFS working on my sgs 2 but I can't get it to work :-(

I've flashed the speedmod kernel and installed the cifs manager app, but it says "no such device"..

I'm sure I just forgot someything but I don't see what.. any commands I still need to run for it to work?

Any help would be nice :-)
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Deleted member 4038153:
According to the relevant thread:
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Joshuax8:
Thank you! It was pointing to /system/lib/modules/cifs.ko but i changed it and now it works! :D
[myTouch 3G, Magic General] livingincm:
Hey guys,

I really need your help on this one. Apparently my HTC magic does not read ANY SD card anymore after rooting the device and installing European RUU. Its practically unmountable.

Its definitely not hardware based as it's able to partition via clockworkmod. Im thinking it could be a software problem but I can't install any rom because it can't mount any sdcard.

Also I can't flash the ruu rom anymore.. it doesn't detect my device even though HTC sync and adb is connected.

I only have access to adb shell commands. I.e adb shell reboot etc

Fastboot commands doesn't work as it gives error. Some weird remote denied thing.

Please help as I'm really at a dead end and I don't wanna give up doing this.

Thanks guys.
[myTouch 3G, Magic General] 5[Strogino]:
Turn phone off.

Turn phone on by pressing and holding Back + Power.

Write here first 5 rows (all symbols are important)

This info need to understand what type of Magic you have
[Epic 4G General] Xiutehcuhtli:
This is one of the better App of the Day offers I have seen. I don't know about all of you, but I use apps like this all the time and it would be great to have a full version rather than the trial crap I usually get.

http://www.amazon.com/mobile-apps/b?ie=UTF8&node=2350149011&path=%2Fgp%2Fbrowse.html&useRedirectOnSuccess=1&ref=mas_faad
[Epic 4G General] Falstafff:
Very good deal from the appstore. Great info, thanks!
[Galaxy Tab Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] lilladyo2cute:
was gonna do the alpha 2.5 but the links don't work to download the rom. does anyone have a working link for the cdma honeycomb? I would appreciate any help
[Galaxy Tab Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] SWILK3RS:
I found the post on this forum and verified that the download link is dead a few weeks ago. I sent a PM to the OP but they have yet to respond. *shrugs*
[Off-topic] agentfazexx:
Source: http://www.infoworld.com/t/intellec...lock-patent-stomp-android-or-windows-8-177178

Anyone into the lockscreen development realm needs to be mindful of this, if they don't want to be sued.
[Off-topic] cp_kirkley:
The US patent system is FUBAR. I despise the ability to patent such a generic ability. Especially when it existed in other areas first.

Love apple hardware (best trackpad in the business, bar none) but I really dislike the legal/patent shenanigans.
[Off-topic] AllGamer:
ahh... no problem

slide 2 unlock is sooooo old school

we got Face Unlock from ICS

and 1 touch unlock from CM

and WiFi unlock from 3rd party apps

and... soooooo much more options in market
[Off-topic] agentfazexx:
Not just the generic ability, but it's open source they're trying to patent parts of. Android functions under GPL for the most part. GOD I hate Apple with such an indescribable passion!!!
[Off-topic] cobraboy85:
+1

they are ridiculous. pissed that a superior class of devices designed for a wider variety of users with a wider variety of income is outselling their overpriced and "on lockdown" garbage.

but hey, whatever let's make the consumers pay for it.

screw apple.
[Off-topic] agentfazexx:
Yeah Apple sucks. Their controls and locks are pretty stupid too. It limits functionality like crazy. Then they come in and try and force everyone to use their inferior product. I seriously hope they get sued for antitrust.
[Off-topic] Gusar321:
And the worst of it is, this is not even Apple's "invention": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tj-KS2kfIr0 (seek to 4:00)
[Off-topic] agentfazexx:
Wow, that's interesting...
[Off-topic] AllGamer:
+1

Outstanding! :eek:

I want one!

Customized version of WinCE

full spec http://www.gsmarena.com/neonode_n1m-1137.php

[YOUTUBE]Tj-KS2kfIr0[/YOUTUBE]

from 2005 wow!
[Off-topic] MartyLK:
This doesn't have to be a problem for Google. All they have to do is, first of all after making Android legal, simply license the slide-to-unlock property of Apple.
[Off-topic] agentfazexx:
The point is, they shouldn't have to worry about that crap.
[Off-topic] z33dev33l:
I believe the patent in question actually specifies a full slide where you actually have to slide your finger clear from one side of the locking mechanism to the other. If a flick gesture achieves the same end it is not in violation of said patent. I've never slid my thumb even halfway up the screen.
[Off-topic] Gusar321:
Neat little device, isn't it? I want one too!

Not very flexible though, not even java. And who knows how much the browser is capable of. But who cares, it's a really, really neat little thingy! :D
[Off-topic] dakine:
Damn thats annoying, i like apple's products but man they behave like such arrogant irritating f#cks, it just puts me off completely.

Sent from my GT-I9000.
[Off-topic] MartyLK:
Well, it's really easy to avoid infringing this Apple technology, simply go back to what was being used before the iPhone's slide-unlock feature appeared: Tapping an unlock button.
[Off-topic] xaccers:
Perhaps you should watch the N1m video. Your timeline appears to be skewed.
[Off-topic] z33dev33l:
On winmo there was an application that looked almost like the top of a rotary dialer that you slid to unlock long before iOS had it. They were just the first ones smart enough to patent it, and good for them.
[Off-topic] xaccers:
Good for them? What exactly do you think the patent system is for?

The slide to unlock patent has already been ruled invalid in Europe.
[Off-topic] dakine:
Patenting things invented by others is ridiculous and should not be possible. A patent should only be able to go to the actual inventor. If the inventor foregoes that option it should automatically be public domain. Biotech companies pull the same BS they patent genetic strains cultivated for hundreds of years by farmers and then tell them they have to pay to use it.
[Off-topic] MartyLK:
Well, the first time I ever saw a "slide-to-unlock" feature was on the first iPhone. And I've been around a long time.
[Off-topic] sleepyfu:
I sure hope you never drove 0.1 mph over the speed limit.

[via XDA premium]
[Off-topic] N8ter:
If google had gotten this half the people in this thread would be demanding they use it to sue apple. This thread is hilarious.
[Off-topic] MartyLK:
Sadly I do it all the time. I need to slow down and be much more patient going from place to place. It's extremely difficult to obey the speed limits. But that's no excuse. If I get caught, I deserve the fine. Nevertheless, I certainly will bring it to the forefront of my attention and be much more careful. Maybe decide to drive about 3 to 5 MPH under the limit at all times.

Now, lets talk about Android, shall we....

If you owned something someone else wanted and they attempted to make an agreement with you to compensate you for using it, if you didn't want to, is that legal justification for going ahead and using what belongs to you without your approval and permission? Suppose you decide you don't care. all good and fine. But suppose someone else in your situation does care and does not want anyone else using their property without permission. Does that put them in the wrong? If it is theirs, do they not have the right to do with it what they want? Do they not have the right to tell the one who wants to use, they cannot use it?

Is the kind of world we live in better for disregarding laws if each of us determine a law is invalid? If so, how is that any different from anarchy? I mean, if you believe law "a" is valid only for others and not for yourself, how is that right?

Now suppose the person who wants to use their property goes ahead and does so without the owner's permission and the owner decides to let the legal system handle it, is that wrong? It's their property that is being abused. Apple wants Android dead and buried. That much we all know. However, if Android isn't infringing any of Apple's property, Apple can't do anything about it. But if Android is infringing Apple's property, it is Google's fault for any detrimental outcome to Android. Google is the offending party in all of this and as such has jeopardized the life of Android. When someone breaks a law, they are to be held accountable, not their victim.

If Google had spent the time and effort to invent an alternative to whatever they needed from Apple, Apple wouldn't have any case. Same goes for Samsung. But they didn't and apparently chose to take the easy path and steal and copy.
[Off-topic] lesp4ul:
**** you apple, i will continue to use slide to unlock, flip to unlock, kiss to unlock or any silly future patent you guys busy of instead creating new technology.
[Off-topic] sleepyfu:
I sure hope apple buries android, cause #occupyApple would be a fun site to see.

Oh and finally SJ will RIP.

I wonder what would happen if an i-device can no longer access any google service, you know like gmail, maps, youtube...

Stop fighting, embrace. Figure out why people like other products and implement to yours, oh wait, you have, look status bar shortcuts and voice actions.

[via XDA premium]
[Off-topic] N8ter:
More people use windows live and yahoo anyways and most of apple customers would probably just use iCloud services.

That, and google would get the Microsoft antitrust treatment.
[Off-topic] A2CKilla:
hmm, you know i think, oh no, apple is gonna sue me for the patent of the letter i, oh goodness i did it again, :o oh no, there it goes again :rolleyes:
[Off-topic] hungry81:
Your missing one essential point. Apple took ideas that were there being used by others, and claimed ownership via patents. To simplify: If there was a public park in your area, used occasionally by various kids and one day someone new enters the neighbourhood, comes along and says its their private property no one else can use it and demolishes the equipment to start building a house. Would you object?

What about then if they then started saying that they were the ones who originally made the park in the firstplace, despite the fact they clearly did not?

What about if you went and checked this and you found out that they had purchased this public land from the local council without anyone else in the community being consulted, and without any of the normal checks and balances? would you just say oh well its the law it must be right and continue with your life, or would you push for an inquiry from a higher independant body?
[Off-topic] z33dev33l:
if they buy the land it's theirs. Same situation applies.
[Off-topic] hungry81:
Sorry my fault. I can see where my example is a bit cloudy/misleading. And no one likes a poorly thought out example :embarrassed :eek:

Basically I was attempting to equate the purchase of the public land from by the private investor, to the patenting of applications and functions that are already in use. I can see in my example where that can be confused with one company selling its patents to another, which is a seperate issue in itself.

Basically without all the example BS, I agree with the others who have stated that features and functions that have evidence of prior use by other parties should not be able to be patented. And if they are, the patents should be thrown out when strong evidence supporting prior use comes to light. I do not think that stating its patented its theirs its the law, is a satisfactory answer when clearly its an abuse of the law.
[Off-topic] z33dev33l:
I'm going to sell my car, let me notify every imaginable car-buyer in the world that I'm doing so. That's totally sensible.
[Off-topic] hungry81:
Sorry. I edited my post to fully explain my thoughts at the same time you were writing this. Hopefully it explains my point of view slightly more coherently. It's been a long day lol
[Off-topic] 12345ss:
oh of course, just like every other good citizen, we need to obey the law no matter how ridiculous it is. that's the whole point right?

so, is there any legal action that we as ordinary citizens could take against this ridiculous patent law? ;)
[Off-topic] gkalen:
**** apple and all ****ing apple products..

They are so ****ing idiots.
[Off-topic] upichie:
I didn't feel your post was in any way misleading. I completely understood your point, and I completely agree. I feel that both z33 and Marty would give their lives if the law said so, just because it did. It is undeniable loyalty, and in one way I can repsect it. I also think it's horrendously ignorant, and everything that's wrong with the USA's current form of thinking. (But maybe that's why neither of them get the point, both being from the USA.)

No offense to any American's (consdering my culture is for the most part the same).
[Off-topic] xaccers:
Ok think of it like this, there's public land with a public right of way, it's sold to a developer and they try to deny public access to the right of way.

They can't do that without proving that it hasn't been used for bloody ages, and even then if people start using it while the case is being heard it shows it's an active path.
[Off-topic] z33dev33l:
I'm not the law abiding type but I just don't see the problem. I mean this land comparison, regardless of how the land was obtained, means the land is owned by this new company. Trespassing is still trespassing.
[Off-topic] xaccers:
There is no trespass as there is an existing right if way.

If you built a house on it the people could legally walk straight through that house because they were already using the right of way.
[Off-topic] z33dev33l:
as someone who's built my own house and had to deal with all of the ordinances that's just not the case. The point might make more sense if you said a guy was trying to buy a supposedly abandoned road but had to prove that there was no traffic on the road when a few actively drove it daily then the point might make more sense, at least here. I'm not certain of the laws in your area.
[Off-topic] xaccers:
It's common law.

A public right of way cannot be denied. It's why there's been loads of cases in the past of ramblers walking over private land and through properties because the developer hasn't adhered to the law and has claimed ownership.

Likewise in the case of Slide to unlock, the court ruled that as it was pre existing technology the patent was not valid.
[Off-topic] upichie:
z33dev33l still holds his crown for king of not being open-minded. ;)

If it makes you feel better, xaccers, I full understood your anology—and your second one, and your third one. They all made sense. z33 says, "I'm not the law abiding type" (direct quote from him), yet thinks that if I corporation pulls strings to bend the laws in their favour, as long as they now own things, we must be happy about it. People like him are why corporations are able to get out of hand.

Let's throw another anology in there: Apple bends the law in their favour and buys your house, without your consent. Let me guess, z33: you shake their hands, congratulate them, and move out? Thought so. :rolleyes:
[Off-topic] OptimismPrime:
i know where this will lead, to "breathe to not suffocate", apple will have a patent on it, only iBreathe users will legaly be able to use it.
[Off-topic] z33dev33l:
I own my house. No one owned this technology prior to apple owning it and if they did apple bought it from the previous owner. For the record, all the similarities I referred to were software.
[Off-topic] ArcticWolf91:
So can Google now claim ownership of the pulldown notification bar?
[Off-topic] Kailkti:
Lets all claim ownership of sometjing. Imma go patent my idea of mechanical pencils with coloured lead.

$1 gets you a reply
[Off-topic] z33dev33l:
if they or someone else haven't then they need to get on that.
[Off-topic] upichie:
I claim control of z33's account! Sorry z33, but I'm going to be deleting it—since I'm now the rightful owner.

Keep blindly obeying. I see it's working great for you so far. :rolleyes:
[Off-topic] DahIzzo:
HTC should patent the "click the power buttom to go into "standby/sleep" and click again to wake up your phone from it" function...since they had it before the Iphone at WMobile...

(well yea other non smartphones in the very past may had it aswell-> but who cares?

apple doesnt care either :P )

srsly...
[Off-topic] CallMeVentus:
Who those d*cks trying to kid , flip d*ck , they did opposite
[Off-topic] gt5402.1:
okay

who want's to use also ''slide to unlock''?
[Off-topic] bojarevics:
that's insane! omg.
[Off-topic] spovat:
+ 1. right on point
[Off-topic] spovat:
you can with galaxy nexus
[Off-topic] Kire101:
The slide to unlock gesture was overrated IMO. I really enjoy the puzzle piece unlock.
[Off-topic] MikeyMike01:
In this thread? Yes, yes there is.
[Off-topic] sparkplug619:
Wish I read this thread sooner.. My laugh of the month
[Off-topic] kutster:
I laughed and shook my head when I saw this. Ridiculous!
[Off-topic] sparkplug619:
Apple, you are the whiny ex-wife of all good men.

You are so great at the beginning, but when the man grows tired of your bs and wants a divorce, you patent him.
[Off-topic] z33dev33l:
stock android is more unpleasant than touchwiz or sense.
[Off-topic] upichie:
You don't even have to say anything about this guy, he discredits himself. Too easy! :D
[Off-topic] sspikey:
surprised it took them so long to get angry
[Off-topic] MikeyMike01:
It really is. Maybe ICS will fix that... Probably not.

Won't matter either way because your phone will never get it because Google doesn't care enough to fix the growing fragmentation problem.

Sent from my SGS II
[Off-topic] hiu115:
Apple wanted to own the world by selling one device *EPIC FAIL*
[Off-topic] InfiniteRisen:
What's next apple?
[Off-topic] xaccers:
Anti competition investigation and hefty fine in Europe, possibly larger than MS was slapped with, perhaps?
[Off-topic] phatmanxxl:
Not if they all get shiney new ipads and Macs.
[Off-topic] upichie:
... and then sue even MORE people for (allegedly) copying the looks of the old AND new iPads and Macs. :rolleyes:
[Off-topic] phatmanxxl:
Suing/banning bathroom stall manufacturers for using "slide to unlock" on the stall doors. :rolleyes:
[Off-topic] upichie:
Haha! I laughed. Hard. :D
[Off-topic] InfiniteRisen:
Lol!

&10chars
[Off-topic] 915rko:
The law says F U, is that valid?

Seriously, I'm just joking. I couldn't let this pass. No hard feelings :-)
[Off-topic] captain67:
I actually laughed out loud there, nice one. I'll be sure to copy your joke and post it on Facebook.. Please don't sue me.

Sent from the best phone ever
[Off-topic] xaccers:
Well now you know you're wrong to credit Apple for it.
[Off-topic] Tatsuya79:
I wanted to go pee but I was afraid at getting sued by apple for unzipping my pants.
[Off-topic] MartyLK:
Nah...they only sue on the upzipping, not the downzipping. That way they have you by the gonads. They let you relieve yourself free of charge, but make you pay afterwards. :D
[Off-topic] slinkyslinky:
This is ridiculous! How can a gesture be "owned"!?
[Off-topic] limpexowns:
LOL true said!!
[Off-topic] MartyLK:
Since Apple owns the actual technology enabling that gesture...the capacitive touchscreen tech...they have the right to anything done with what is theirs.
[Off-topic] Gusar321:
First, Apple does not own capacitive touchscreen tech. Second, the notion that anything can be patented just because it happens on a capacitive screen, doesn't matter that it already existed before, is so beyond ridiculous, I don't know how a person can say something like that with a straight face. Actually, I do know - RDF.

Like I said in that other thread that got moved into off-topic: The only thing crazier than this patent are people who actually defend the patent system.
[Off-topic] z33dev33l:
gotta agree, I patented fire so the combustion engine is my invention by default right?