yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S I9000 General] $omator:
isc theme port i think mostly, not much can be doune wo aosp sources thats why cm guys are holding for that source release
[Galaxy S I9000 General] telep:
I hate ports, cm7 still isnt good enough as stock samsung gb (used it few times), ok its faster but thats that, only benefit. I gave money to samsung not to devs (dont want to be disrespectfull) in turn i expect software updates. Many people satisfies with ports but we need to demand from oems to update our expencive phones.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] chiefy009:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1318526

Ics port fully working

sent from my commodore 64
[Galaxy S I9000 General] Fremen567:
If you're all about stock than why hang around here on xda?

Pozdrav :)
[Galaxy S I9000 General] telep:
So if i use stock rom on sgs i dont need to be on xda? Nice thinking. Most custom roms on sgs are crappy, only nice rom is serendipity.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] Fremen567:
Chill dude, ur gonna get ur ICS. Frankly I will not be upset if we don't get it from Samsung. If I really want stock ICS I'll just trade my SGS for Nexus S.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] $omator:
btw official for Poland (excluding one carrier) is still froyo :]
[Galaxy S I9000 General] dinuguang_tobol:
very well said! couldn't agree with you more

I have one question though, im just wondering why devs were quick to do an SDK port to nexus S but not sgs1, i mean, its not an official update from google, why isnt there any SDK port for galaxy s yet considering its much more popular and has more user support than nexus S..is it because of the hardware makeup for nexus s? sgs1 hardware too customized by samsung that it need internal softwares and drivers to work? i also noticed almost all custom roms for sgs1 are just modified source codes from samsung official source..is it safe to assume we wont have custom rom for sgs1 unless sammy provides an ICS firmware upgrade specifically for sgs1?

RANT alert:

It's because of this f**king carriers that samsung had to make different models, the carriers are the ones dictating the terms, like they wont buy them products if they cant customize and be unique to them, in a way I support apple for standing up against these carriers, apple is the one that dictate the terms, apple wont bend to their terms..in fact apple's strategy is to partner with underdog carriers (at&t instead of verizon, softbank in japan, korea..) so they dictate the terms, once the number 1 carrier realizes the potential benefit of an iphone, they will be begging for apple to sell their products to them
[Galaxy S I9000 General] chiefy009:
Nexus one wont be getting ics officially

sent from my commodore 64
[Galaxy S I9000 General] greeced:
I stand corrected. You are right. But upon some reading, its because of hardware limitations on the device that would deem ICS pretty much unusable on the G1 (multitouch being one of them I think). And I'd have to say, if there wasn't any limitation to functionality, I'd say google would have thrown it their way too.

Either way, thus far the G1 has had a pretty great run.. updated all the way to 2.3.6. been around 2 years I think? Well beyond Googles 18 month update policy anyway.

And honestly, if I had the G1 to begin with, I'd say compared to todays devices, its very underpowered and I wouldnt' be so upset going to the latest and greatest
[Galaxy S I9000 General] ccrows:
OK for the sake of keeping this short, I'm not gonna quote your entire OP, but I just want to say 2 things in response to your post.

First all we need is any major carrier to leak ICS to SamMobile (formerly Samfirmware) and we should be able to port it via Odin. Up to now including GB, its been an easy proceedure.

Second, "Nexus" IMO is kinda overrated. Yes it gets A LOT of dev love, but take the original Nexus 1 which just got denied ICS "officially" today. The Nexus S is "supposed" to get ICS, but if it does it will definitely be the last major firmware. Galaxy S will get ICS, and probably one more major. Lets also not forget that Nexus has been ditching Micro SD support.

IMO a Nexus phone is not that much better than say a Samsung unlocked phone...
[Galaxy S I9000 General] evil-doer:
nexus one and g1 are not interchangeable terms. the g1 is otherwise known as the htc dream and was the first android phone released.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] deanbilly:
What file system does the Nexus S use?

Is it the same as the SGS1?

I heard ICS ran on an entirely different file system to the SGS1.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] drakenabarion:
SGS1 has a different file system in stock roms to Nexus S but it didn't stop CM7 from converting the file system to the same system. File system changes are what stock rom "lagfixes" are based on anyway. :-)

SGS1 has sufficient hardware resources for ICS so if no official version is released, its because of something else. (Phone carriers, etc)

Sent via my GT-I9000 running CM7 (GB 2.3.7) using XDA premium
[Galaxy S I9000 General] kamelot.sk:
stock roms for SGS1use RFS, pure android (Nexus S) uses yaffs2, I think. But filesystem is not issue. If ICS would need some other fs, then we will format our system partitions to that fs... Even for current stock roms there is a solution - ext4 lagfix.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] deanbilly:
So if the file system needs changing to run ICS, doesn't that make it unlikely that Samsung would offer it for the SGS1?

Wouldn't the upgrade need a complete data wipe?
[Galaxy S I9000 General] eloisant:
No you can change the filesystem without loosing data. With a custom kernel you can already switch back and forth to ext4.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] haloimplant:
The conversion procedures in the custom kernels seem to just back up all of the data on the /system /data /dbdata and /cache partitions to /sdcard, make new blank file systems, and then restore.

Besides worrying about space on /sdcard to back up, space on the new partitions to restore, and the very long time that this can take, ICS will most likely want a fresh start anyways.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] twixter:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vfSOAHsDz8

fake? what do you mean
[Galaxy S I9000 General] $omator:
is it recorded with a shoe?
[Galaxy S I9000 General] telep:
Thats cm with ics theme, he could hide togglers from status bar, but with them on its obviously fake.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] zorxd:
I think Nexus S uses ext4
[Galaxy S I9000 General] drakenabarion:
Yaffis2 for most partitions such as system and ext4 for data. (I think its data? Its only one of the partitions in ext4 anyway.)

Sent via my GT-I9000 running CM7 (GB 2.3.7) using XDA premium
[Galaxy S I9000 General] deanbilly:
That's not a Galaxy S in the video.

---------- Post added at 06:10 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:04 PM ----------

Here's ICS on the Nexus S.

ICS on Nexus S
[Galaxy S I9000 General] Pieter19:
It IS Galaxy S, but on gingerbread. In the market you can download "ICS Laucher" with buttons for nexus prime (home, menu and back). In Galaxy S it is useless.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] deanbilly:
The bottom of the phone looks too rounded.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] Galaid:
http://android.hdblog.it/2011/10/28...android-4-0-su-galaxy-s2-note-e-tab-nel-2012/

Samsung has officially confirmed that Italy's new Galaxy will receive the update to Android 4.0 during the next year. The devices are confirmed:

Galaxy S2

Galaxy Notes

Galaxy Tab 10.1

Galaxy Tab 8.9

Galaxy Tab 7.7

Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus

.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] mathijs727:
Im missing the s 1...

Luckely we have cm9.

I like the stock ics interface more then the stupid tw3 stuff.

Mathijs
[Galaxy S I9000 General] Fremen567:
But they also said Samsung will evaluate other devices as well, but only those with WVGA resolution to include "old" i9000, they saying it naturaly doesn't mean **** but hey we can still hope.

LG flat out said no ICS for 2X.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] e34v8:
I think we will get ICS 100%, mainly because the Nexus S has the same hardware. I'm more concerned about the quality of the UI Samsung lay over the ICS. I still can not understand how Samsung manage to produce the best hardware and the worst software.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] Fremen567:
That is the issue here I believe, Samsung stuff on top of ICS. We know vanilla ICS can run on our device but what happens when Samsung ads another "hungry" layer.

They can always say "We cannot provide it 'couse we don't want bad user experience" or something along that line.

I'm hoping for good news from CM team once source code is out. They gonna come out and say what devices are getting next build. I really do not know if SGS being officially supported by CM means anything once they start work on CM9 or is it up to developers of CM7 for SGS to decide wheater or not they gonna work on port for us couse most of them have SGS2.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] $omator:
cm for i9000 still aint 100% reliable and working system, do you think that with ICS it will be otherwise? dont think so...

question about ICS on i9000 is NOT IF but more likley WHEN

other manufacturers like Motorola and especialy Sony are right behind Samsung on updates (and when they release there is no phone FC, draining battery after 100% charge or bsod) so it would be very unwise for Samsung not to update I9000 to ICS as soon as possible to get those milions of i9000 users very happy ones, and willing to stick to the samsung brand.

while still leaving full ICS experience to their latest devices (mainly due i9000 have crappier overall performance than nowdays high end phones)

---------- Post added at 02:10 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:36 PM ----------

with no I9000 ICS i will pick most likley latest Sony or Motorola device.

they maybe update with a bit 'lag' but those are very well enginered and tested updates(no FC on phone, bsod or discharging after 100%) and well hard to say but with same price range their design is better.

picking Samsung i had in mind Samsung Google cooperation and hardware specs, but now specs got simmilar and i guess Samsung got overwhelmed with a wide palette of their devices and got stuck between releaasing ltest firmware updates faster than competition and realy making a quality/tested product out of them.

not pushing ICS when we all know it will run on NexusS preety smooth would be that thing that would push me towards other brand i guess
[Galaxy S I9000 General] Galaid:
I'd be very surprised if we get 4.0 from Samsung before April if we look at how they pushed updates before, but already Samsung Italy is missing notion of SGS1 when they talk about updates, so more likely we are going to end with CM9.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] $omator:
they do not miss SGS1 on that list, it was not evaluated YET

and it is clearly stated at the source of this information

, some people fails in transllating the information fully. they saw list and made copy paste not bothering to reaad full information

and oh well suposedly Saamsung Italia and the site that published that info aint a reliable source for that type of leaks
[Galaxy S I9000 General] tetsuhito:
We still didn't have 2.3.7. And with the annouce from samsung italia. I have no hope for ICS officialy for our phone. The software update is really a huge problem for android.

No ICS for a phone with less than 2 years. Since the 3gs is still update by apple.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] $omator:
here is the 'source' of this information and it is clearly sted that only Samsung Korea can announce that and Samsung Italia is only assuming those devices would get an update first

pick a language to translate to and read by yourself

http://translate.google.pl/#it|pl|h...android-4-0-su-galaxy-s2-note-e-tab-nel-2012/
[Galaxy S I9000 General] bhu1:
Samsung has just confirmed those devices on which they have 'TESTED' ics working smooth, they will although put touchwiz on top of ics. And they will also test older devices including sgs soon, I think so.

Regarding optimus2x, it was always laggy. I saw a video of it when it was launched, the guy was just swaping screens and lag was clearly seen.

And also lg optimus 2x had very bad built quality , it doesnt always mean that your phone is awesome just because it has a tegra 2 or a exynos 4210 inside , the setting of the hardware inside the phone with each other is also very important in making a phone smooth and successful and I know one thing that samsung's hardware quality and setting is top notch and our hummingbird is able to handle anything that tegra 2 can handle so I think we still have hope.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] Fremen567:
There is no 100% with any software, stock rom is not perfect either and CM is stable enough to be daily driver, there is no doubt about it.

Hell even iOS is not perfect and 100 % reliable. I owned iphone before this and know it from personal experience.

I was just wondering if guys that gave us CM7 will work on CM9 port for us couse they all switched to SGS2 i believe.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] $omator:
but at least i can record and play 720p video with stock firmwre, or/and utilize all i9000 modules :) and unrooted it will run smooth for a long time, all the problems come from custom roms and kernels, but thats another story
[Galaxy S I9000 General] drakenabarion:
I don't get all the CM7 bashing :-)

I have been using CM7 for over 6 months and had no problems that were not my own doing (other than the small "not working" list of features I don't use). The project is more stable than "stock" roms.

If Samsung decide not to update to ICS then those who wish to use ICS will be depending on this project and CM9. But there will be an option to use ICS so lets not worry. It may just mean that roms will have more variations on the core level which is good for everyone.

Sent via my GT-I9000 running CM7 (GB 2.3.7) using XDA premium
[Galaxy S I9000 General] ccrows:
OK but lets say Nexus S gets ICS and everything runs smooth. You really think that's gonna go over well with end users if Samsung tries skipping SGS users?...
[Galaxy S I9000 General] gabster21:
CM7 is blazing fast but I have had a lot of FCs and freezes, I've done a dalvik wipe + Fix Permissions, seemed to fix the issue.

No luck with the sleep of death though, happens once a week and really annoying when it makes me miss my alarm! :(

I downloaded an app called "Wake my Android Pro", which is supposed to prevent your phone from going in deep sleep, hope that will fix the issue.
[Galaxy S I9000 General] drakenabarion:
Well each phone responds to custom software like CM7 differently so it may also be the nature of ICS for I9000 if Samsung decide not to support our upgrades. Lets hope that there will be a release suitable for all levels of experience and not just tech nerds like me :-)

(CM7 - If you have a lot of apps installed, there might be a full cache - search for moving cache from /datadata/ to /data/ often fixes the problem but isn't 100% the same speed after)

Sent via my GT-I9000 running CM7 (GB 2.3.7) using XDA premium
[Galaxy S I9000 General] jcagara08:
c'mon let's just be positive for nexus s already has a stable port and it is a known fact that that is a twin device to our I9000. GALAXY S = NEXUS S right???

keep ya heads up!

BTW I'm on CM7.1
[Galaxy S I9000 General] $omator:
Not only stable "port of sdk" but also a fully operational firmware that is internal samsung jazz for now. And probably will stay that way until galaxy nexus lunch this month. After that the NEXUSS update will follow shortly as well as the source that will mean cyan team starting their game on it. Peace out :-)

Sent from my GT-I9000
[Galaxy S I9000 General] jcagara08:
Amen to that somator! Wow nice avatar! Is that the boot screen of ics?
[Galaxy S I9000 General] $omator:
my mod logo ;-)

anyways no ics on s1 will be a shot in own leg by samsung

i want updates and real support not buggy firmware after firmware, and dropped support "because we have new device for you to buy" - that would be intact very aple'ish by samsung

so at the end that would be galaxy nexus for me I guess next year and wherever google would take their toys to in the future

Sent from my GT-I9000
[Galaxy S I9000 General] sohell:
Not seen an answer to or a discussion on this - hope someone can enlighten me :-)

is it possible for the onscreen navigation buttons (the back, home, menu buttons) on ICS to be toggled on/off?

I hope so, as it will be silly having the onscreen button AND the capacitive/hardware button as well!! What a waste of space! :eek:
[Galaxy S I9000 General] $omator:
Are you even serious? lol

This video will give you answer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQ3U4G2jxmw

Sent from my GT-I9000
[Galaxy S I9000 General] upichie:
Yes, that is possible.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] ProTekk:
No download will be made available. Sorry, just wanted to shut people up about getting a crap SDK port because the source is apparently too far away (2-3 weeks away).

Enjoy the clip.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] church101:
Needs to be closed this just retarded
[Thunderbolt Android Development] idkwhothatis123:
On rootzwiki someone ported the sdk for the tbolt. Its completely useless. No touch support, no voice or data, nothing. Just boots and you can use adb commands to maneuver around
[Thunderbolt Android Development] justin654:
And the link to download that port is here. http://mirror.jdkoreclipse.net/rom/bolt/ics-mecha-15.zip
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Pithism:
im glad XDA has put out some great work recently.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] ProTekk:
You're ALL very welcome and I sincerely hope you enjoyed a great production.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] ThunderStick:
I second that motion

Sent while tapping my ThunderStick on a bolt of lightning...
[Thunderbolt Android Development] g00s3y:
Completely pointless and dumb, maybe to jersey shore loving teenagers this might be funny.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Grizzly420:
Fantastic. That was awesome! lol
[Thunderbolt Android Development] calebv2:
+1 bravo
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Ryanmo5:
This garbage wasn't posted by xda, put the blame where it belongs. Thread closed.
[Captivate General] jazenf:
Is there anyway to port the the original camera from the Samsung captivate to the miui ROM.?
[Captivate General] Bowsa2511:
I miss the touchwiz camera, it's so superior.
[Captivate General] mrhaley30705:
To put it simply, no. I would think out had something to do with it being a Samsung thing. One if the biggest problems cm developers had was getting a camera to work. Since MIUI is built off of cm7, you figure it out.
[Captivate General] zelendel:
Miui and CM based rom's use the same open source drivers. The default device camera's. Like the Samsung camera and HTC camera will never work as they need the proper device drivers and framework. I heard the MIUI camera is good. Ill never use it my self but you could give it a shot
[Captivate General] mrhaley30705:
I use the MIUI camera occasionally, and its not bad, for a 5mp camera with no flash.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] dross333:
HI,

I loaded Serendipity 8 and think it's great. Only issue is that I am unable to send MMS messages. I checked on the DEV forum and tried the fix with deleting the telephony.db, but that did not fix it for me.

Anyone have any suggestions. I use this MMS a lot.

Thanks

David
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] TechSilver13:
Did u wipe data and cache in recovery before flashing? If not I'd recommend it. I didn't have a problem with it.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] dross333:
Yes. I also just reflashed and same issue. Just sticks at sending and then eventually times out. I was just using this yesterday on stock with no issues.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] dayv:
http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=18683082&postcount=231

Then read this post

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=18684582&postcount=232
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] garrand:
Have you tried manually adding the proper MMSC apn config?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Misterjunky:
RE: MMS

Here are the two MMS APK files, just push or copy them with

a file manager to /SYSTEM/APP in your internal sdcard and

reboot the phone before using.

Download Link: http://www.multiupload.com/XAI5KHI2OZ
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] dross333:
How is this done?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] garrand:
Settings > Wireless and Network > Mobile Networks > Access Point Names

Create a new APN, (assuming you have AT&T) then:

Name: MMSC

APN: Phone

MMSC: hhtp://mmsc.cingular.com

MMS Proxy: wireless.cingular.com

MMS Port: 80

APN Type: mms

When done, press Menu > Save
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] dross333:
Perfect. This fixed it. Thanks a million!!!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] GiSS88:
I've attempted all the suggestions above, as well as in the main thread, and no luck. The only thing I haven't tried is the one directly above--how would I push the unnamed mms .apk's to the system/app folder?

VERY new to the Android scene, but so far love the customization.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] dross333:
You would need to copy the two apk files to your phone. After that replace the current two files with these ones. I use root explorer file manager but I'm sure that many other will do just fine. Then restart your phone and you're all set.

-David
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] SpectraDawn:
I tried this, and not my message.apk is crashing like crazy...

This did nothing for me...

I can't even see the APN settings that are under AT&T HSPA+ and AT&T MMS. So, If I were to try this, how will I get the stock APN settings?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] onthezone:
Since 8.1 I'm now having data problems, I'm thinking about ditching this ROM
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] GiSS88:
Found a file manager, copied them over and reset phone. No noticeable changes, and most definitely can't send MMS. Unfortunate, as I really like S8 otherwise. Might have to try Unnamed though.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] MikeyMike01:
"It doesn't work" isn't useful.

I've tried everything I can think of and I can't get an MMS to NOT work.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] mastergrillo:
This is the apn i used and it works perfect

Name: AT&T MMS

APN: wap.cingular

MMSC: hhtp://mmsc.cingular.com

MMS Proxy: wireless.cingular.com

MMS Port: 80

APN Type: mms,supl

Dont know if supl matter but all o know is that it work
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] mastergrillo:
Downloan APN Manager and edit from there
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] GiSS88:
When I follow the steps in the first link, that file/folder doesn't exist. Any suggestions there? Attempted to create an APN, still no luck.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] robstunner:
Heres my advice:

#1: Download CM7 on your computer

#2: extract MMS.APK from the app folder within the zip

#3: move that apk into your phone, and using root explorer, move it to your system/app folder. (back up your original apk first).

#4: make sure the permissions are correct.

#5: Enjoy perfect MMS messages that don't show up as pictures, and gain the opportunity to use black background and custom notifications settings.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] SpectraDawn:
I personally don't know how to explain this. In stock it works fine, switching to the UnNamed Rom worked fine, then with yours it just doesn't work. I shouldn't have to bring an apk or w/e from another Rom to Serendipity, and I shouldn't have to change APN or any other setting because I'm using a stock AT&T sim card. I'm not unlocked or anything so it should work. It, for some odd reason, does not work with your Rom... :(
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] GiSS88:
Was able to successfully switch to the Unnamed apk...and still no luck on actually sending MMS messages. Just switches how the texts look. Very annoying so far. Going to try the CM7 files again.

EDIT: No luck at all with the CM7 files. It actually changed the messaging to the CM7 app once, force quit when I tried to adjust settings, and wouldn't open anymore from that point. Giving up for the night, already too late.