yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] andrei_me:
flash the recovery and wait, leo said that tomorow a new update ICS will be available with percentage on battery. on the curent theme you can't get percentage

and other mods and features.

---------- Post added at 09:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:00 PM ----------

there was something about this in earlier post. try that. i remember i saw something.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] eeliah:
ty, i read that Leo's post but there was something earlier then too :D i'll wait then!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] zainqaiser:
I am using the ics theme....really love this theme....but when i put the fon on silent mode....my status bar shows two identical silent icons instead of one....any ideas??? And which kernel is best on battery life and has bln support??? Thanks
[Galaxy S II Android Development] dbtomas:
CheckRom LOGO if You like ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kaynow:
Hi guys. Have a Problem. On the Jkay Deluxe Settings i set the option to don't show the vibration icon, but i still see it. I've toogled vibration on and off an i also rebooted the phone.

I'm on silent mode with vibration on and like i said, i still see the two icons in the top bar.

Any ideas? Thanks!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Lownita:
4036 in quadrant benchmark with checkrom and speedmod 2.9, hihi :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] v0dKa.mL:
I can't install another theme :-( i have the revolution super atm. When i download via kitchen and will install it cmw boots install something and reboot after all android is back but with my old theme :-(

Please help me
[Galaxy S II Android Development] android_888:
Me 4700+, same ROM, same kernel :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] jonny68:
hey i asked the other poster not sure if the seen it where did you get your signature from?:)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Evollution:
Can someone post some pics of miui theme
[Galaxy S II Android Development] brojoe11:
Thanks Leo for your and Chech's work. Everything I've tried has worked and looks great. This is your greatest work yet. IMO.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] CamoGeko:
It wasn't when I last looked.

Because the devs are working on it and they have their own lives too. Not just XDA lives lol :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] TonyK2005:
New version is;

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1720398
[Galaxy S II Android Development] CamoGeko:
My sincere apologies, didn't think the dev got that far yet.

Typed on XDA premium app
[Galaxy S II Android Development] hondilla:
... Kernel updated again ... :D

(Reverted back to original wifi drivers for now)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ToucherCD:
Any news for RevoHD ICS? :(
[Galaxy S II Android Development] baza14:
First new ChechRom is for SGS3.:( http://checkrom.com/threads/gt-i9300-xxlf2-4-0-4-checkrom-evohd™-v1.808/

GC wrote we will get rom first. So we will maybe get ROM soon. Maybe not.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] adz63:
Will be flashing it straight away f5 is gonna get a battering

Giving it some beans on my blue s3
[Galaxy S II Android Development] thanksgiving60:
the battery life is amazing!!!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] uppon2:
LOL Priority fail. Like I have said before. A man is judged by his word.

If you once again want to know the truth. I have been telling you guys for a long time. What a joke. Look here:

THIS IS WHERE THE TRUST STARTED TO FADE

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=25088719&postcount=19548

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=24292093&postcount=19032

Oh but wait. They have a perfectly working ROM but want the visuals to be perfect. We will wait for jkay....... Bwahahah jkay releases and then what? NOTHING. They never had any progress. If they did then they would have released already. If you can't see that you were lied to by now then you are clearly naive. If you want more then read below

You want more? OH I have more my friends

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=26625798&postcount=20391

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=25828331&postcount=20022

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=25734793&postcount=19929

I BELIEVE IT IS WELL PAST THE BEGINNING AND MIDDLE OF JUNE. June is almost freaking over. Nawwww you have a problem with your arm? But you were still pretty hyped up about SGS 3 and never stopped developing there did you?. As you will witness below the change in attitude

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=25703341&postcount=19889

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=26919259&postcount=20514

While reading this next post please read carefully at the part where GadgetCheck CLEARLY stipulates and I Quote "Ha so you can see the Kitchen/Rom there but we will first roll ICS for SGS2 aka you guys and then only SGS3"

Post is found here http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=26913757&postcount=20494

I don't know about you but there has clearly been a lot of lies going on here. It's all there.

Just to summarise

-ROM is still not released nearing the end of June and was supposed to originally be released after Jkay (Which was months ago now) Because apparently they had everything ready to go but were being delayed by jkay...? Um NO!

- ROM got new release date for beginning of June. I don't see it?

-SGS 3 looks like it might get a release before SGS 2 Even after GadgetCheck clearly stupilated that it will be the other way around. Judging by the lack of posting/support here I can't see us getting it first. Where is the SGS 2 changelog and progress report? Hmm don't worry guys it's not like SGS 2 users have donated more and waiting longer than any SGS 3 user has. (Enter Sarcasm Here)

At the end of the bloody day. We weren't forcing you guys to LIE and mislead anybody. If you aren't going to deliver on time than don't say anything at all. At the least keep users updated if you are falling behind. I will say it again. I JUDGE A MAN BY HIS WORD. Your word means **** to a lot of people now. Well done. I know people donate and that is their choice but when you hype something up to gain more followers and then fail with your promises then I think that is pretty low. It's not hard to just tell the truth for god sake

I WILL LEAVE WITH MY FAMOUS POST: WHAT REALLY HAPPENED TO THIS ROM AND WHERE ARE THE USERS NOW

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=25865313&postcount=20060
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Scarface1991:
Just yesterday I came back from an ICS based Rom to Checkrom 6 again. Remember devs of this rom don`t owe nobody sh*t. They are doing it on their free time and if you can not wait just move to another rom. There are plenty of ICS roms out there to choose from. This rom is still the best for me because everything works and it is very stable. No problems whatsoever and I can`t say that about any other ICS based rom running on the Galaxy S II and I have tested many.

So guys chill out
[Galaxy S II Android Development] hondilla:
Maybe yes, or not. Wait and see.

If not .. then you'll need tons of mercy here ... I guess :rolleyes::o
[Galaxy S II Android Development] uppon2:
Dude. I haven't used this ROM in a very long time. I am here to stand up for everyone else because I don't really care what people think about me. I come through with hard evidence. I am not expecting anything other than what has been said to the users. People have waited and donated on the hype of a new release, due to the nature of the promises laid out. My point is simple. Don't say anything at all rather than lie. It's not hard to tell the truth. The devs can come and go as they please, but lie to people? That **** doesn't fly around here son. People don't get very far in life based on that attitude. You are missing my point and have your tongue too far up their ass. Or maybe you didn't read my post correctly. Either way.

EDIT* You are saying you haven't found a stable ICS ROM. I'm sorry guy but I think you're a noob for even posting that.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] thanksgiving60:
DAMN!

havent visited the I9100 forum much lately and looks like we have a soap opera going on here...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] MatangaChanga:
Same here, yesterday came from Wanamlite 12.0 to CR v6.

Waiting eagerly for v7!!!!!! :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] maranello69:
---wrong topic---
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iekansh:
It's stable because it's GB man. Can't compare GB and ICS atm and ICS is quite stable imho. I agree with uppon2, no one wants lies, other than you obviously.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] simes6600:
can compare GB and ICS easily. what do we benefit from ICS apart from facelock (joke!)? geez, even the S2 ICS had to be themed by Vert to make it look like proper ICS.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] beston94:
This evidence is just overwhelming...It's as if it was a puzzle. And suddenly all the pieces are there and they fit and they are clear. Wow. It's like a story, but without a happy ending..
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iekansh:
It's never use his theme on Sammy rom. If I'm so desperate for pure ICS look, then I'll use CM9.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] simes6600:
umm. thats what i just said ;-)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Scarface1991:
There are several problems with ICS based roms for me.

1. Some Apps have more battery drainage, especially music apps (media server keeps my phone awake almost the whole time while listening to music. I asked for a solution but nobody replied...

2. I cannot see the files on my sd card in the File Browser while on Android. I can see them in Mass storage mode. When applying the SD card fix I cannot mount my internal SD storage and my SD card in mass storage mode (I cannot access them anymore). This happens while I am on AOKP based roms.

If there is a fix for those 2 issues I would definitely have stayed with Hydra-H²o Rom. If you know how to fix this please tell me...

However I do think you are right at the point that telling something to the public and then doing it completely different is wrong. No question about it.

Oh yes and no need to get insulting here buddy ;-)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] simes6600:
simple fix dude. don't use AOKP. they look great, some lush customisation, but ultimately, battery life is average, and they have flaws like the SD card issue (which i had like you, tried fixes, hence reverting back to sammy roms). try Neat Lite rom with siyah if you wanna stick with ICS.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] LeoMar75:
Closing the Thread for Now

I am Forced to Close this thread because of the Off Topic Rants...

I will reopen this thread only when V7 comes.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] LeoMar75:
V7

There!

After a Break and after all the Up's & Downs in Life

Here is What all you Guys want: http://checkrom.com/threads/rom-xxlq5-4-0-4-checkrom-revohd™-v7.844/#post-12524
[Galaxy S II Android Development] GadgetCheck:
Thread Reopened!

Go crazy!!

And This took time to Deliver :laugh:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] :
wow... absolutely gonna test it. Waiting.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] vivmar:
Omg! I can't believe it
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ephraim:
I hope the kernel included was stripped of of the hard brick bug, like gokhanmoral did :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] :
Kernel: Dark Knight V2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] CamoGeko:
V7 deserves a new thread imo. :D

Sent from my HTC One X using Xparent ICS Blue Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] GadgetCheck:
V7 wont get the 3M views we have hahah haha
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ApriliaM3:
That doesn't answer the question.

SGSII GT-i9100 via Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II Android Development] hawkerpaul:
Gadget/Leo

Has the DarkKnight kernel with LQ5 V7 been tested for not having the hard brick bug? (ie. perform a CWM factory reset/CWM restore AFTER its been installed)

There have been unfortunate cases of LPQ based kernels causing this catastrophic bug.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] anshmiester78900:
Great i will definitely try it :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] jebuchanan:
Where is the download link?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] joshuab227:
+1
[Galaxy S II Android Development] :
Of course... the kernel will come to us bugged so we can brick our devices... CheckROM devs are too perfectionists to make such a fail. Either they release a stable thing or they release nothing.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Gorjess:
wow all the sudden they come up with the newest V7 based on LQ5, the first! :victory:

i always love CR, much kudos to GC and his affilates..
[Galaxy S II Android Development] adz63:
I gave my s2 to my gf when I got the s3. I told her she has to wait til checkrom v7 arrives before I start modifying so on behalf of her thanks

Giving it some beans on my blue s3 Powered by CheckROM EvoHD™ V2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] jebuchanan:
Will the kitchen include the JKay framework?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] imfun:
I'm not going to a party tonight.. Tonight I'm instaling new V7 !! :D :P
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ApriliaM3:
Why don't you just keep quiet and let them confirm it. It is a legitimate question that has been asked given the recent bricking episodes and the answer is important enough for the DEVS to answer it without people like yourself "muddying the water" with your unproven statements.

SGSII GT-i9100 via Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II Android Development] daniel_costa_rj:
Uhuuuuuuuu

Enviado de meu GT-I9100 usando o Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] :
You don't have the right to shut me up. Of course that DK will be brick bug free. THINK, before being such a noob talking to me this way. Do you really think they would release something that could break devices? We are talking about CHECKROM, kill me if they release even a "nearly stable build"

btw, I was being a bit ironic in the other post.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] joshuab227:
If CF root kernel can brick a phone...surely all new kernels must be double checked to be free of the "brick bug"

It is a very legitimate question
[Galaxy S II Android Development] hawkerpaul:
Sorry mate, but you're way off the mark here.

Sometimes bugs slip the net, no matter how good you think the developer is.

Microsoft, Apple, Samsung, all with their limitless resourses have issued software with bugs in, and always will. CheckROM is no different in this regard.

This is legitimate and extremely serious question, so let them answer it. They, or anyone else for that matter, do not need your sycophantic comments.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Krendelrus:
nevertheless, answer straight from the developers of the supplied kernel will be nice

[offtop]p.s. you don't have to be so sarcastic and so sure in other people's work[/offtop]
[Galaxy S II Android Development] :
Bugs slip the net, but this brick bug is already known, and since it's happening, they know how to deal with it. It isn't like Siyah 3.1rc6, he released but it slipped the net.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] MaKTaiL:
LQ5 is dangerous. Don't use that.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Goldie:
+1000 the other guy obviously doesnt read the note forums.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] :
Actually, I have to say sorry, I didn't mean to be "so sure in other people's work", kinda a accident.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ApriliaM3:
I'm not trying to shut you up. I'm saying that we have listened to your fan-boy comment but I and many others would prefer to hear the answer from the people that the question was asked of: The Devs.

Btw, did you mean sarcastic?

SGSII GT-i9100 via Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Krendelrus:
btw, why not use the chinese 4.0.4 rom - it has been officialy released in China (LQ5 is a leak) and has all the usual languages? using it with latest Siyah, all good except from not working camera preview and bluetooth
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Rulandas:
you sure its 4.0.4?! as its LP. I guess 4.0.4 starts LQ
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Gorjess:
keep arguing like this would thrash the thread with useless unrelated crap that will eventually jeopardize it.. GC reopened this thread not long ago and you guys made a great opening.. end it already, it wont do any benefits..
[Galaxy S II Android Development] :
Ok. Where's the mod to clean up? Really, it's better if some mod clean this up.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Mr.Greg:
If thread is reopen, I think non development questions should ask in Q&A Checkrom thread, leave this thread clear. Was reopen and already one quarrel, one predicts, one cry ... developers spend lot of hours trying to improve our sgs2 day by day, for free.. Let's respect their work and don't post here non useful words:fingers-crossed:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] SergeF1:
Kernel is DK V2 or stock? Homepage shows DK V2 and if you open the post shows Samsung stock (bold) :P
[Galaxy S II Android Development] centavar:
What do you mean?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] legola:
LQ5 with cf root kernel have reports of brick phone when hard reset is perform. The workaround from danieldmm was to use stock samsung kernel. However, stock don't have CWM. So how can we flash other rom from CWM?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] GadgetCheck:
V7 Post

Based on XXLQ5 Firmware from Samsung

Kernel: Stock Samsung (Wont Brick ur Device)

No Wipe

Build.prop tweaks

Hardware Acceleration Enabled (GPU UI Enabled)

resolv.conf added for faster gps lock

Multi CSC

Deodexed

Zipaligned

Battery Optimization

Most of the Samsung widgets and app's removed!

Fully optimized .png's Smooth animation's

Note:

Because this is ICS after all, Kitchen Content will be fully updated in under a week.

For Now will add Modem's and Kernels and App's

Jkay Support will be Pushed Later on via Kitchen
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Dharam_Maniar:
Hey guys, please wait...For now use the stock kernel...I'll develop the DarkKnight Kernel v2 so as that we can flash it on 4.0.4 Samsung ROM's as well :)

Samsung has done something weird with 4.0.4 drivers for Bluetooth and Camera i think...

Lets see if they release any new sources soon...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] legola:
Can't wait for DK2, your 1.8 is superb. If the kernel of CheckROM v7 is stock, this means no CWM. However, can we flash siyah 3.3.2 for the meantime?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] MaKTaiL:
But stock kernel is exactly what's causing the problems.......
[Galaxy S II Android Development] eseregin:
Why, exist rooted kernel from Chainfire with CWM

---------- Post added at 06:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:00 PM ----------

Just dont do backup and restore in cwm and all should be fine

---------- Post added at 06:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:01 PM ----------

Probably could you use rooted kernel from Chainfire or this is what you mean anyway speaking about Stock kernel?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] legola:
I hope I'm wrong in reading the thread of danieldmm.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] intelligencexan:
Cant wait.

When can i start hitting the mighty f5?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ephraim:
Sorry for the question/statement i made earlier that caused conflict to all of you :)

Anyway, the devs answered the question so case closed.

-Cheers!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] -Grift-:
Waiting!!!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] GadgetCheck:
Released V7 for now enjoy
[Galaxy S II Android Development] noscentsbrad:
reserved

Good to see the dev's for this from building it even better
[Galaxy S II Android Development] sannik:
downloading it now..!!!!!!!

everyone are posting about the kernel here..can i flash siyah with the rom???
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Skrilow:
Finally guys ! I'm soooooooooooo happy :D Checkrom v6 was a masterpiece ! :DD

BIG THANKS :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] aceian:
Download started before servers get overloaded :p
[Galaxy S II Android Development] rajarshi10:
Someone please post some screenshots
[Galaxy S II Android Development] edwardeutsch:
Hey guys...sorry but i dont understand! What are the problem??

Tapatalk @ CM9
[Galaxy S II Android Development] aceian:
There aren't any problems ...

Just there were some doubts, misconceptions which are cleared now ...

All is well :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] imfun:
Just flashed the rom :D I feel great great great great smootnes and no problems so far :D BIG Thanks :D Amazing smooth and fast scrolling!! :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] edwardeutsch:
What about kernel? Stock kernel or CF? Stock kernel doesnt have cwm...right?

Tapatalk @ CM9
[Galaxy S II Android Development] imfun:
Yes, no cwm.. :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] avetodave:
Ok, so no cwm... But can you install cwm afterwards? And what about having root permissions, is the phone still rooted afterwards? Of course after full wipe!

Do i have to do a full eipe when coming from checkrom v6?

And btw does the kitchen provide noice reduction off mod?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] imfun:
After full wipe, phone still got SuperSU

Not yet.. Maybe, but i don't find it in kitchen..
[Galaxy S II Android Development] AllSeeyinEye:
Yup, it's time for some answers. Is the kernel rooted? Is cwm available?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] rajarshi10:
And if we backup/restore... will I get a hard brick? Checkrom should publish a FAQ as soon as possible cause this might cause many bricks as reported by users flashing 4.0.4.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] MaKTaiL:
- Rooted

- Stock kernel

- No CF-ROOT

- No CWM

Use Mobile Odin to flash a custom kernel with CWM. DON'T install CWM through ROM Manager.

If you perform a full wipe using CWM on stock kernel you will BRICK your phone.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Skrilow:
Kernel will not brick our devices,don't worry guys ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] smeatr0n:
I'm confused. I will sit back and let some guinea pigs flash it first lol...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] eseregin:
So what about Chainfire rooted kernel? with cwm?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] MaKTaiL:
Yes, flash Chanfire kernel afterwards and you won't have any problems. :good:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] AllSeeyinEye:
If we're not to use CFroot, there's no kernel fit for this rom base. A fully functional cwm is the most important part of the phone.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] XDA mark:
I can't believe my eyes. V7 is here :O
[Galaxy S II Android Development] rajarshi10:
Okay... so we flash it normally, then we flash the Chainfire's kernel to get CWM. After that, if we want to restore our backup then will we brick our device?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] therion21:
XXLQ5 isnt it related with major bricking ?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ermacwins:
So what improvements does 4.0.4 bring?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] dharmil007:
This is ICS right ???
[Galaxy S II Android Development] eseregin:
Right, of cause 8-)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Cangir:
Can I flash N.E.A.K ? or will I brick my phone :S
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iekansh:
It will break wifi and all.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Dharam_Maniar:
Your bluetooth and Camera wont work...We are waitin for Samsung to release new source for 4.0.4 to develop kernel for v7 :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] origins:
bricked my phone... can't enter download mode too... :(

i flashed cf-root kernel with odin after rom, then i was flashing samsung app (to connect galaxy with kies to recover messages, address book etc) so it bricked.. don't know what to do..
[Galaxy S II Android Development] rajarshi10:
Yikes! I'm not flashing this anymore :laugh:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] spaxx24:
How do I restore backup when on samsung kernel? :|
[Galaxy S II Android Development] smeatr0n:
You don't. Flash another kernel with Odin first.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Dark Emotion:
LoL... there was many stable official ics roms and no checkrom. Now when buggy, brickable 4.0.4 is out you guys release it few days later... That's funny
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mysterio619:
****!!! Bricked my phone :(.......now its completely dead........cant boot also........ppl please dont flash custom kernels with recovery........i did a factory reset and my phone got ****ed
[Galaxy S II Android Development] rajarshi10:
Gosh! Thank god I didn't. Thanks guys, u saved my life. I wont flash this anymore. I feel bad for you guys. Everyone had high hopes for Checkrom :(