yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] :
I sure can my friend it seems that you though can not..I am voicing my opinion and explaining stuff about how i make my wifi go to sleep when the screen is off..you still do not lose any notifications that would of come through if you have your wifi on...What JD does for you the way i have my wifi does the same exact thing for me. Thing is i do not have JD taking extra juice from my battery...Now i posted my opinion i am not complaining about your beloved JD so just end it here.:D thank you and goodnight.:)

EDIT: ok you do not want your wifi to not go into sleep when your screen does then fine do not follow my little guide..it was not meant for you anyway it was for in general...people can either try it or just ignore it...simple as that...anyway i said what i said i will wish all a goodnight and new week may bring some new goodies and new themes for all you lovely checkrom followers.:)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] tbong777:
Buy an extra battery....and replace all that "battery anxiety" with the JOY of using the full power of the SGS II !!!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] vnvman:
Lol +1...i bought a spare off expansys and now i just run at stock speed all the time with a decent undervolting of both the cpu and the gpu...actually now that i'm using the latest siyah battery life is so good that i don't even need it anymore :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Noed:
If your response was not for me, why did you quote my message on the response?

JD is easy to critic.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mredfern79:
I set my wifi to never sleep and with this, data sync etc on I only see 1-2% battery drain overnight.

You should try another modem. It is this that controls the radios and the power they use. If you have the wrong modem your phone will naturally use more power trying to improve signal strength and quality.

Another thing to check with wifi is interference. Do any neighbours have a router using the same channel? Try wifi analyser from the market.

Sent from my Galaxy S2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] :
Right again i will say this and stop it right here cause this is the whole reason why this thread is full of moaners and whinners....My original post about JD was not in response to you..If you actually read through the posts i was talking to Jonny68 and no one else..

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=19107774&postcount=4896

that is my post that i replied to Jonny and no one else...

So next time please read to who the response goes to...And if you thought it was for you did not mean no offence:o

Anyway enjoy the rest of your evening Sir:)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Noed:
Very good, thanks

I've tried a few modems already, got improved 3G and phone signal, but not wi-fi.

Also tried wifi analyser, changed my router to the best channel and made sure other routers in the neighborhood are not in the same.

My wi-fi is weak at work too, other phones get better signal.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] andrei_me:
i always got good result with speedmod. initial result with siyah are interesting. after a day i got 63% with 1hours and 22 min screen on, with the lulzactive governor ( i'm curently testing the governor and i'm not impresed with lulzactive, i think for me smartassV2 is a bit better, and again for ME, for other another governor might be better). ( this is for the guys that wonder about my and others screen time when we get 2 days. )

---------- Post added at 10:27 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:13 PM ----------

and i don;t get people how complain about others who maybe want a better battery life. this forum is to address all issues from it's users. how does this affect your life is someone asked what kernel offers a better battery and so for. we all paid for the phone. you think your posts about your stuff are more important and people enjoy reading it?

if you can help that person help them don't "moan" about them and contribute to the high number of posts. and yes we all have electricity but i'm more on the move that maybe you and i want my phone to last me a bit longer than stock.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mredfern79:
The wifi driver's / firmware are in the kernel. Have you tried using the stock kernel with no tweaks changes to see how that impacts your wifi? It's the stock cf root kernel that I use.

Sent from my Galaxy S2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] tbong777:
Doesn't work that way Sparky. I am "helping" rational people to understand there is no battery issue....The more whiners about battery life the more I will post to buy a friggin battery. The device is powerful and Samsung has allowed for battery swaps AND LARGER batteries. What more do the spoiled people want? 3 days of not using their devices not enough?

Battery life is not an issue....Never has been never will be as long as there a re remedies....like electricity and extra batteries. now go and seek or proudly post some battery graph showing how you are getting a week of battery life with................ everything turned off..... because you live in the woods and can afford a $500 phone but not a $16 battery.

How about people posting some REAL issues that can not be solved so simply? So we will not have to wade through more useless battery posts to find solutions to them.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Noed:
Oh wow, wi-fi is in Kernel? I thought it's in modem.bin

The major reason I tried other ROMs, Kernels and modem.bin is because of weak wi-fi I get on stock, usually 70dbm, 30% signal... better than that only if I'm 4 meters or so away from the router.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] :
Check and Leo have a couple of beers on me :D

3P054433WK730715R
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Fauert:
Kernel

Hi , NEW ABYSS : AbyssPlus-KERNEL-12 :

http://www.multiupload.com/J83NXHV5W4 :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] apeiron6:
Abyss kernel is working great. Thanks
[Galaxy S II Android Development] rockys_hell433:
Quadrant benchmark are amazing in this rom
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ExilHh:
you've got a link to the thread please? would like to take a look on it.

thanx
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Lownita:
What the hell, didn't even know that this submenu exists :eek: Any more hidden menus in the menus I should be aware of? :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mredfern79:
Have a look at this app.

https://market.android.com/details?id=org.wahtod.wififixer

I don't think the app itself will help but there are some good tips to set up your router that will help signal strength and battery life.

Sent from my Galaxy S2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] :
i did not knew about it either...Thank the dev from Siyah for pointing it out on his thread...It makes the wifi sleep when your screen is sleeping also...And when your screen is awake the wifi wakes to. For me it works and no need to install task killer applications and other things....:) there are a few more hidden menus but they are top secret:p

just kidding...if i find anymore i let you know
[Galaxy S II Android Development] nEUTRon666:
This is all getting worse every day here now..for what do we have the kitchen? Since we don't get any answer on WHERE leo is, the kitchen app isn't maintained anymore (my feeling) with a bunch of old and non-working stuff in it i'm getting to believe that leo isn't really contributing to this. Makes me very sad since his revo rom's are still state of the art, so is his kitchen app.

All questions about some new stuff in the kitchen get's answered with "download from original thread" or "install it manually with cwm" ...sure i can do that, but then i don't need the kitchen at all.

Don't get me wrong, don't want to aggrivate anyone of the CR team or getting offensive here, but a little bit of info, maintaining rom/kitchen and so on would be awesome. When is something happening here again?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] tbong777:
Now THIS is an issue worth solving since the kitchen is an integral part of both Leo's ROMs. I have not used the lirchen much becasue of some of the issues.

I flashed Revolution theme and a few low level features. The rush to Ice cream is not a priority as I like go Launcher with the standard Revolution theme. Keeoning things simple saves a lot of potential issues as well as KNOWING what is happening during every flash. which I can see some people don't understand some things about flashing ,,,,such as clearing Davlik and cache has zero benefit when flashing a Kernel. LOL A basic understanding of how things work will help solve a lot of these frustrating bootloop issues using the Kitchen. It is not the kitchen that is at fault. ts more the people who willy nilly flash from the kitchen not understanding what is happening.

.

Mixing themes will cause issues. Makes little sense to flash an OC kernel if one doesn't understand what IO scheduling or the various Governess actually do or have a real need for the additional performance other than useless benchmark scores that have no real world indications. .

I decided on using SpeedMod because I prefer CW4 at the moment. and its always been a no frills Kernel (since the Captivate) that just works and is updated and tweaked a lot as well.

My Nandroid back ups are all CW4 created and until I see uniformity in that ability I will stick with the known. I didn't notice any performance differences with the DK kernel worth confusing Nandroid back ups..
[Galaxy S II Android Development] gopo2004:
man this is the ****ty rom y ever tested....

1. Market... force closed

2. Zedge(and other sound settings)force closed

3. Internet is so ****yng slow... Now y have drops in my Hsdpa...

4. Gallery... my pics is gone(they r in my files but not in my gallerY

Force closed in almost every game y play

All this after 3 in stall(2 fresh with complete wipe)

Wtf?! LEO pls come back... this dev suck sooooooooooo hard!!!!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] OzBoy1:
I am not sure you could call it "pointing out facts". Sure my time with Leo's ROM 2.6 and 2.7 was limited and now on CRR 2 and have found it as solid and stable as the previous releases. Had some minor issue's which were sorted by a full wipe and since then perfect. Yes there is a lot of complaining here but that is just people's opinions "not fact" and most of the complaints are related to issue's that can be resolved easily if people would search and or read the thread. It seems the ones who don't/can't do this complain the loudest and the ones who have a perfect working ROM just get on with it.

You are always welcome to an opinion and you are welcome to post it but please don't call it fact, it's not, it's your opinion and I get that it's important to you but please remember it probably isn't important to anyone else.

Finally if I was involved in the development of this project and logged on to see the messages that have been posted recently I think I would probably stay away for a while too, you bust you gut to put something out there hoping people would enjoy it and you would have some fun only to be slapped in the face continuously. I have seen other dev's leave projects at this stage due to the lack of respect shown by people who are using their hard work for free.

While I love the ROM I am not what you would label a fanboy just someone who appreciates something for nothing, it's not very often in life you will get something for nothing enjoy it and be thankful.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] FirstNoobToBrickHisPhone:
Lol you're the only one with those problems.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] tbong777:
you need to try this one.....

http://www.google.com/search?q=noki...&ei=Axm3Tu2qJOri2AXH8vm0CQ&sqi=2&ved=0CDAQsAQ
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ExilHh:
... and this is one of the ****tiest posts I ever have read!

Please show some respect!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] apeiron6:
Nice one :-D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] marcadam:
Well you seem to be the only one having those problems and disrespecting the dev in the way you did only makes you look like a complete tool. If you don't like it, install another rom simples.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mbutandola:
It's strange how people easily forget. When Leo released 2.7 it had many bugs that were corrected by 2.7.1. But before that, there were people whining too. Even Samsung sometimes release buggy roms. The iPhone 4S has bugs that see people not being able to hear through their earpiece when making calls. Their billions dollars and thousands of developpers didn't prevent that. We come here because we are not satisfied with what Samsung has brought to us. But still, instead of helping them with constructive feedback and encouragements, we complain and sometimes get disrespectful.

Those who are not satisfied have the option to flash something else.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] tallica55:
It doesn't matter what others do. It is the fact that the best Roms were the Revolutions made by Leo the master himself. And it seems to me and some other people that this rom is not controlled by Leos awesomeness.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mbutandola:
It seems? You're basing that on what? And how useful is such a comment? Very nice for the other dev's that have dedicated their time to develop this project. To me the rom is very nice. I've solved early issues which were more kernel related. And even if they were rom related I find such comments inconsiderate.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] longtins:
Well said.

I have had absolutely no real issues with this rom at all.. all has been working great with no fc's at all.

Haters gonna hate
[Galaxy S II Android Development] xsycox:
Actually, you are totally wrong. When Revoultion 2.7 with all its bugs came out, everybody was working towards Leo and giving hints. Nobody was whining or argueing. So, Leo managed to fix all the issues within 24 hours. 2.7.1 came out the next day (or was it even the same day?).

Here we have a different situation. For some reason CRR 2.0 is not as good as 1.0 and also there were some major bugs, which should not occur e.g. using a bad kernel (Hellcat) and other things.

Also, it has a ****ing bad battery life and you have to work out a lot until you find a prober solution (with a different kernel and tweaking).

Whatever, I wish all the best for the CRR development, but up to now I am still regretting changing from R 2.7.1 to CRR 2.0.

We will see, what the future brings and if it changes my regret for the better. =)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] V1TRU:
I dont understand what people complain in this last release... Kitchen is much improveed, all is smoothly as usual. Explain please
[Galaxy S II Android Development] jeffnz:
Been watching this thread for a while also others on xda and never cease to be frustrated by the sense of entitlent by a noisy minority that expect people to work full time for then. Think its called being selfish and ungratful. I think all the devs and those that try to help should be lauded not made scapegoat for the few that can't be bothered doing anything other than criticise.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] tbong777:
Go back to 2.1.7 before you bust a vessel........LOL
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Deli23:
CRR v2.0, DK Kernel, ICS Theme v2.0, no problems what so ever...

Thanks Team...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] neswii:
This is bad. My phone has horrible modem issues. Won't make calls after being on for a while. A restart fixes it, but then it stops working. It happened after a no wipe upgrade. I will try to reflash a modem. Has this happened to anyone else? Is it the modem?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mbutandola:
Right. That's why you stick with stock rom and don't need to root your phone. Because Samsung, with all their money have always made the best choices, haven't they? And how are you working towards this team to help them improve the rom? Actually, Hellcat's Kernel is not bad at all. Using it at the moment. There are some compatibility issues with CWM recovery 5.0.2.3. If you want something that works out of the box, you shouldn't be coming here. I don't know how much you paid for your phone but I very much doubt that you paid as much to get this rom. But still, I would be curious to see how many emails you've sent to Samsung complaining about touchwiz or the stock theme or anything that, if well designed, would have spared you the need to come over here.

As for battery life, I haven't seen much difference. It's true I initially thought that previous roms were better but in the end I realised that when using speedmod, CF-root or Hellcat's kernels, the phone feels smooth. Siyah's kernel gave me some hiccups for some reasons. But still, whatever the issue, we should respect the devs and their work. Because, at the end of the day, most of us still get a better experience than with stock.

Reporting bugs is one thing. Complaining and making demands is totally inappropriate.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mbutandola:
Well said!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] neswii:
Hmm, this is real bad, the error persists even after modem, and full rom flashes. It's not my carrier, since a friend of mine has the same one and all works well. Absolutely nothing works antennae wise. Worse is, I can't recall what could have caused this. I haven't done anything that's too dangerous. I will backup everything and do a clean wipe. Hopefully this doesn't have anything to do with this efs folder I have read so much about.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] joezy07:
since many other ROMs have been in KJ version, do we expect a newer CheckROM revo soon ?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] uppon2:
People will always moan and ***** about battery life. I am not saying this ROM is terrible but it is definitely not what I'm accustomed to. I know I am having a sooky la la but I am only voicing my opinion because I love this ROM so much when it is 100%

1. ICS should have been removed as soon as more than 1 person noticed something was going on (It's annoying having to flash again considering I racked up so many points on coin dozer and didn't have a chance to back up!!!!!!!!)

2. There was a reason why CF Root was given as default kernel previously. Don't get me wrong I think Hellcat has given me the best experience with this release in terms of speed and battery but considering it is not compatible with the kitchen and was obviously not tested makes me a bit frustrated. The kernel is the voice between software and hardware and mediates it all in to beautiful harmony. All I hear now is people crying and getting frustrated but for good reason

I can understand why other users are mad especially less experienced users.

---------- Post added at 01:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:00 PM ----------

I agree that people repeat themselves without reading BUT Kernels/Modems are 100% responsible for the way our battery is used up (Not including people actually using their phone)

People need to learn about battery cycles and giving it at least 3 days and a couple of complete recharges before commenting. I can also suggest reading the threads for said kernel/modem BUT! In most cases people are using different ROMs and can not gauge the outcome hence why they all dump the problem in this thread.

Your response was more of an attack than anything else and just shows you don't really know what you're talking about in relation to the topic.

I am happy if I get a full 24 hours of medium use considering the size of the screen and the power of the phone vs the capacity of the battery but some kernels fail to give me such results.

A lot of people have had great a experience with Dark Knight but this has been the worst kernel I have personally used and would fail to give me this outcome of usage so I changed to CF Root and problem was fixed. Now for example just say another user was to be experience the same issue with said kernel, they might be able to try what I have said and resolve the problem. To those who are using DK and love it then that's great!

People have 100% right to complain about battery usage in this thread HOWEVER not repeat the same **** over and over when there is a fix 2 pages back.

---------- Post added at 01:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:15 PM ----------

Agreed but the problems with the last 2 releases weren't firmware bugs. Simple rookie mistakes.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] GadgetCheck:
What the heck is this.

If u have a problem with the ROM and u don't know to help your self then better find another Rom enjoy it.

You don't need to ***** about a ROM.

After ever useful comment there is 10 pages of bull****!

Now there are some great devs and super helpful users on the thread who cover for us in our absence so please if u can't help them or support them please don't litter our thread go some other ROM, for which xda has plenty of choices.

EDIT:

New Rom when jkay approves his v13 for release
[Galaxy S II Android Development] uppon2:
I agree there has been a lot of useless complaining but a lot of it could have been easily avoided
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mbutandola:
Good to hear that. Meaning that while people complain, you're still there working for us. Thank you to all the devs for that. I wish it were like the autosport's forum where inappropriate posts get deleted and some members could get the boot!

Anyway is the new rom gonna stick with KI4 or is it going to be based on KJ1 or KJ2, which, I hear, are much better?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] shawnaye:
hey guys, is there a guide to install this rom? because i downloaded the rom but how do i find the wipe version, coming from another rom.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mbutandola:
There's no wipe version. You wipe manually then flash from recovery.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] GadgetCheck:
Ok to wipe!

Reboot into recovery

Do a /data wipe a.k.a factory Reset

then Flash from SD

Reboot

Done
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mbutandola:
With all due respect this is not a customer service. We know what to expect which is "nothing ".

Besides, there are always people that help. I got bootloops after flashing that ICS theme and started thinking that I had bricked my phone but somebody kindly helped me. That's how it works.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] shayne77:
+1 Well said.

All you fools above (who seemed to have tunnel vision for Leo) I've been a longtime user of Gadget's CheckROM's like many many other happy users so how the fark do you know it wasn't Leo's ROM that caused your issues since they merged? Ya ever think about that...

Anyway, been using CRRv2 / ICSv2.1 without ANY issues.. (battery life is determined by USE... a small percentage is about the ROM/Kernel)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] uppon2:
This has never happened with Leo before and when there were minor issues they were resolved within 24 hours.

I personally don't have "tunnel vision". I have used CheckROM before when he first released it and then again with the Dark Knight edition to give it another shot. I have used plenty of other ROMs and even created my own in the past. That's beside the point.

I think the argument now is that issues were never this bad and anything else would have been fixed long ago. Do I expect it NO? That's why I fix things myself but for other users that can't they have relied on Leo's constant support and fixes and that is what seems to be lacking right now due to his absence

I know GC has a life of his own and so does Leo. I can understand that every dev does this in their spare time and I applaud them for that but when other users come along and try and make it look like everything is going as it usually does for the Revolution users I am not going to sit quiet and pretend.

Like I have said before. All of this complaining could have been easily avoided

---------- Post added at 02:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:20 PM ----------

Customer service? I expect to be using a tested ROM and kitchen unless it is released as a Alpha, Beta or RC. Which I would still use and report back

You were scared you were bricked because of a bootloop? *sigh*
[Galaxy S II Android Development] superspacey:
Happy user here from Canada. Info in the signature :) Thanks guys!