yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Desire Android Development] groovepeppy:
Write Too Much Useless Reply

​

andreigherghe, count me in for your beta tester when it's ready to be tested ;)
[Desire Android Development] mrkite38:
This thread is back on topic as of now. Next person who strays off gets an infraction and a chance at a free vacation.
[Desire Android Development] donklaos:
What are the biggest problems building an ICS ROM for Desire?

The display resolution?

The internal memory?
[Desire Android Development] mattman83:
The fact it's being built from SDK and has no appropriate drivers is probably well up there ;) I don't think the hardware itself is going to be a problem.
[Desire Android Development] Terepin:
HW won't be the problem. In fact ICS will be the fastest Android ever due HW acceleration. The only possible issue could be memory.
[Desire Android Development] Droidzone:
Anyone with a link to the dump?
[Desire Android Development] andreigherghe:
I have school in 1 hour, but i'll try to use siulmagic's method to make it boot.
[Desire Android Development] DJ_Jedi:
Here you are:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1309893

I'm gonna try following the G2 guy guide.
[Desire Android Development] danarama:
No proprietory files for drivers or kernel is the biggest problem. They're going to need big hacking to work on the desire, either from desire GB to work with the sdk or from the sdk to work with the desire.

It's going to be challenging enough from source (how long did it take to get GB working well? GB still not got 720p but no biggie) let alone the sdk.

No offense to the op but I don't think he'll achieve this alone. He'll need lots of support from other knowledgable devs (im not knowledgeable enough)
[Desire Android Development] mattman83:
If you check the N1 forums there's someone over there who has a frankenrom booting, though I don't know how badly hacked up it is... might be worth collaborating if you need.
[Desire Android Development] Duker80:
Htc desire hd

HI

Nice Work.

It will work on the HTC DESIRE HD?

Thanks
[Desire Android Development] mattman83:
DHD is different, someone will need to port across when this is complete.

M.
[Desire Android Development] Duker80:
Ok. thanks
[Desire Android Development] JellyXDA:
Ask this guy - http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/20/ice-cream-sandwich-already-unofficially-ported-nexus-s-4g-gets/
[Desire Android Development] vasili_defy:
yeah, keep it up!! :)
[Desire Android Development] dr4ft:
There is now a download link to desire z port.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1309854
[Desire Android Development] tomtomhr:
Here is video of ICS running on N1...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyPeT-ZUbBw
[Desire Android Development] ShiftyBloke:
runs pretty good :cool:
[Desire Android Development] Droidzone:
Is there a link to the Nexus one port? Assuming it's someone on Xda who did it? ;)
[Desire Android Development] ciprigeorgiu:
looks very promising. i could bare some bugs until there will be a nexus porting of the rom.
[Desire Android Development] mercianary:
Has anyone got anywhere using siulmagic's guide?

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1312595
[Desire Android Development] DJ_Jedi:
I'm using it but the phone stuck at bootscreen. Now i've building again and in a couple of minutes flash again, you can follow live progresses on the IRC channel ics_desire_port on freenode (linked on the first post).
[Desire Android Development] Mike130784:
Awsome Mate ! i really cant wait to See 4.0 on my Desire im so thriled lol :D

Keep up the good work ,. i hope its going to be a fast and stable Rom for CM7/r2

either how Im following you on foot from now ;)
[Desire Android Development] DJ_Jedi:
Guys, join us on IRC and support me :D
[Desire Android Development] eckki:
+1

i'am with you. :-)
[Desire Android Development] P0MM3S:
It won't be fast and it won't be stable, it's an sdk Port ;-)
[Desire Android Development] Droidzone:
What kernel are you trying? Stuck Before logcat starts?

TouchPal-d from my Desire running Starburst Classic Rom - 450 apps and counting. .
[Desire Android Development] SilverHawk2:
Your're so right! Amen.
[Desire Android Development] DJ_Jedi:
Come over here :D :D :D

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1313577
[Desire Android Development] Terepin:
Pwned! :D

10char
[Desire Android Development] BOOBYROM:
merge treaba?
[Xperia Play Android Development] XperiaPlayer:
This thread is to serve as a destination for all R800i needs. Anything that is related to or works on the Xperia Play R800i will be posted below:

LATEST SONY FIRMWARE: 4.0.A.1.283

LATEST CM7.1 ROM: FXP42 - CM7.1

LATEST MIUI ROM: XMIUI - 0.1a

Kernels

DoomKernel - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1176502

CM7 Kernel - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1128216

Stock Firmware

4.0.A.2.368 UK - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1221105

4.0.A.1.283 NORDIC - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1269845

3.0.1.A.0.145 - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=14192328

Recovery Images

CWM Recovery -

How to use:

fastboot boot recoveryPLAY.img

DO NOT FLASH IT

http://www.multiupload.com/VC3JRZ74H0

Roms

CM7.1 - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1128216

GBMixerPlay - ="http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1251257"]http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1251257

Frasertag System - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1140540

GingerStation - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1250873

Zerorom - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1250351

XMIUI - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1303443

Themes

Galaxy S II - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1156802

GreenGlow - xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1253793

Universal Theme Kitchen - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1065789

xPlay Theme - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1138806

Transparent Home - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1078694

Gingerbread - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1088564

Honeycomb Style - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1147262

Black and White - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1168658

Simply Clear - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1135657

WP7 - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1134390

MIUI Blue - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1082506

Green Mod - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1086234

Full Black - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=983274

Gingerblue - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1150559

Sense Statusbar - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1090985

Tools

Mupen64Plus - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1260390

PSXPeria - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1201532

xCharge Reboot Options - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1123576

Flashlight - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1299749

Transparent Notifications - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1085118

Notification Widgets - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1292634

Bravia Engine - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1246402
[Xperia Play Android Development] XperiaPlayer:
Reserved for future usage.
[Xperia Play Android Development] nickholtus:
nice!

Thanks for the list!
[Xperia Play Android Development] XperiaPlayer:
No problem.
[Xperia Play Android Development] Logseman:
It seems like compilations are the trend now :D
[Xperia Play Android Development] Cat_On_Droid:
good thread. I see alot of cool themes to choose now :)
[Xperia Play Android Development] d31b0y:
Well played sir. Well played.
[Xperia Play Android Development] silvacrest:
nice work :)

im seeing themes and tools i wasn't even aware of
[Xperia Play Android Development] XperiaPlayer:
Yeh some of them are from the arc forums. Which also work on our device.
[Xperia Play Android Development] Nhialor:
which is the most up to date version sony version which supports PSXperia?
[Xperia Play Android Development] idan_mo:
great work! but please keep and update (rom & stock rom).

i've flashed the recovery and it doesn't load into recovery. any ideas? maybe i did it wrong?
[General Questions and Answers] htcevodakkar:
Hi! I have lost root access after recently updating my HTC Evo 4G. I checked with 'root checker' with the following response. I have looked at previous posts but none of them fit. Can someone help?

Thanks in advance.

Root Access is not properly configured or was not granted.

Superuser.apk - com.noshufou.android.su - version 2.3.6.3 is installed!

System Environment PATH: /sbin /vendor/bin /system/sbin /system/bin /system/xbin

The adb binary is set to default shell user access as a standard non-root user

Standard su binary location: ls -l /system/bin/su:

-rwxr-xr-x root shell 26324 2011-10-13 22:39 su

Standard su binary location: ls -l /system/xbin/su:

lrwxrwxrwx root root 2011-10-13 22:39 su -> /system/bin/su

Alternate su binary location:

/sbin/su: Permission denied

Alternate su type binary location:

/system/xbin/sudo: No such file or directory

SU binary not found or not operating properly
[General Questions and Answers] CallMeVentus:
Try re-rooting .
[General Questions and Answers] htcevodakkar:
Thanks a bunch!:)
[Huawei Ideos X5 U8800] n0_xQuZe:
Ok i think the question is clear enough, in your opinion, right now, which is the best combination of rom+kernel that has the best speed-smoothness/battery life-stableness?

I have tested both Miui and Oxygen with Franco.kernel and personally believe that oxygen+franco is much faster with the same governor and cpu value with miui, but miui has much better battery life and probably better "looks". Also miui has never let me down when it comes to stable phone whereas oxygen has caused me some headache with some unexpected restarts.

I know that it mostly has to do with what a person wants but i would like to know what does the majority prefer :)

That's just me, what do you guys think based on your experience?

Thanks!
[Huawei Ideos X5 U8800] Fistra:
Miui

Sent from my u8800
[Huawei Ideos X5 U8800] exafanizol:
Miui until geno fixes the battery drain issue on cm7, and ofc franco kernel
[Huawei Ideos X5 U8800] joshphilips:
Miui works well for me !
[Huawei Ideos X5 U8800] eddydc1:
Oxygen+franco, cuz miui doesnt support finnish language and cm7 not so stable for me
[Huawei Ideos X5 U8800] brdnacer:
cm7 + franco kernel.

really don't know what's wrong with cm7... ok camera stops working every 2 day, but restart helps... i have cm7 for a week and i'm pleased with it...

just flash rom, leave it for 3-4 days just for testing, and flash new one ^^ that's how i'm doing
[Huawei Ideos X5 U8800] mangoman:
I just got the phone, so had a hard time choosing between the "bugs" in each rom.

So did a read on each rom.

Was between oxygen and cm7, but on oxygen hey have reported pin problems lately.

Ended up flashing cm7+franco.Kernel+gapps-gb-20110828-signed. Then used 99francoRam and replaced libril.so and libsensorservice.so.

What should be "normal" battery time on the phone? Overnight (6h51min) battery went from 93% tp 70%, but cpuspy shows 6h12m deep slep.

One reason to try cm7 was that mount internal card problem was not mentioned in frontpage, but HwUserdata is not in \mnt\sdcard so not seen by applications.

Would be nice if link2sd wa sable to use it.

Seems to take longer to set up phone after changing rom than reinstalling windows..
[Huawei Ideos X5 U8800] smiley_nz:
Miui
[Motorola Triumph] whitesneaka:
Help! I ran gingerbreak on my phone. Upon installing it reset my phone and now it wont go past the Motorola "M" logo when booting... It will just keep on turning on and off... tried hooking it to my computer but I just get the connect/disconnect noise from windows repeatedly. I didnt even have a chance to create a back up file...

any suggestions or do I need to claim my phone was stolen and collect on my insurance? lol...
[Motorola Triumph] primetechv2:
Install ClockworkMod on your phone.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1282951

Install b_randon14's stock ROM.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1242761

Hopefully that'll bring your phone back to working condition. That and (shameless plug) my ROM comes pre-rooted too...
[Motorola Triumph] whitesneaka:
Thank you for the file. I gave it a try and im stuck in a boot loop... any other suggestions?
[Motorola Triumph] primetechv2:
Try this ROM instead. It's bigger because it's more stock. Try the deodexed version first; if that doesn't work, go odex.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1260816

The one thing I've always been able to do (with, well, the 4.x version of Clockwork) was to go back to this total complete original backup.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1218162
[Motorola Triumph] whitesneaka:
It seems to have worked in terms of booting! Now it is operating very slowly at the moment though...
[Motorola Triumph] primetechv2:
The first boot is always the slowest. Give it another restart for all the files to cement themselves in place.
[Motorola Triumph] Neptik:
I'm thinking you forgot to put debugging on. Because when I did it. Worked like a charm
[Motorola Triumph] primetechv2:
Yeah, that too.... following the instructions as Gingerbreak starts is kinda required.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] sulzer:
Does anyone know of a solution for getting badges for the default mail app to show up in Launcher Pro on either the app icon or the dock icon? It works fine on the app icon when using TouchWiz, but not when using Launcher Pro.

Initial research didn't yield any results; it seems to be a problem for other platforms as well. *sigh*
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] jorge89:
I know we can't have CM7 on out phones because Samsung has not released the source code for Gingerbread but what about Froyo source code? if it has been released could any one port CM6?

I added a poll to see what every one thinks.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] jorge89:
If you go to https://opensource.samsung.com/ and search for T959V, you can download 2 files named SGH-T959V_Opensource.zip and SGH-T959V_Opensource_Update1_Kernel.7z, I don't know anything about coding, but would this be the source code that is needed to port Cyanogenmod?
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] jorge89:
I downloaded the files to check but I don't know anything about coding so I don't know how to tell.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] RaverX3X:
its possable to make a asop froyo kernel as we do have the froyo source
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] jorge89:
I'm assuming people would rather have Gingerbread with touchwiz than Froyo pure Google awesomeness since all the ROMs I see are touchwiz, I personally would rather have a pure Google experience. If enough people ask for it would devs port CM6?
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] htaak:
I'd check it out if it was available....cm6 would be good compared to our current cm0....

Sent from my SGH-T959V
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] TheKucho:
Wow, never thought of this! Doesn't seem too outdated to me as I'm still on froyo. I would love to test this and possibly donate when i make a paypal.

If this is for real, im as excited as i was when i first flashed a rom to this phone.

Q to the devs: How hard would this actually be? And is it "possible"?
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] RaverX3X:
not impossable.. just takes time...
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] camalus:
I vote for CM6.

Its better than nothing. It would be awesome.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] jorge89:
Some one should start a poll so we can see how many people would rather have cm6.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] TheKucho:
Would you kindly do that? I'm also scared of some ignorant people who'll vote no because they already have some awesome gb roms lol. ): this is sone great "news" lol. Thanks for bringing this up jorge. An ABSOLUTE yes from me.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] krylon360:
2 words... why settle?

Why settle for something obsolete. Learn patience. Seems all people do is want want want, but I've only seen a handful of people actually put any effort.

All this "hey, here is a froyo source, I don't know what it is or how it works but I want a rom from it"

Good things come to those who wait! You won't get CM6. Nuff said. You'll get CM7.

Another reason. There are NO MIUI froyo roms, nor source, so you would be reinventing the wheel.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] mzangui:
it feels good to see Krylon around this forum again :)
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] RaverX3X:
i know the feeling really lol like the 35 + pms i get some of them from the same people two or 3 times about hey can i have miui when u gong to be done with miui really it gets old quick..... we appreate that u love our work but this is a hobby not a job.. not trying to take away from what our getitng at just stateing i knw how u feel and can empathize with what you are saying 10000 percent...

im sure i could finish it up and make it for the most part as stable as a frankenstined build goes but updates? no not going to happen period not without a proper build and sorry no i love u all but im not going to port every update that comes out for it by hand...

so as kryon said why settle.... really why settle for an inferior cm 6 when u can have 7.1 and why settle for a inferor miui when once we get source we can do it right.......
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] jorge89:
I'm not complaining, I'm really thankful for all the great roms out there and realize most people don't have any right to say what roms you should make since most people just ask and don't donate, but it is my personal preference to have vanilla over touchwiz, I will be patient and wait, I never said there was anything wrong with the roms I'm using, and again I thank all the devs for spending the time and effort on making phones better than they already are.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] jorge89:
I don't have any coding experience but if any dev wants to take me under their wing and teach me what they know, I'd really appreciate that. I can start by making a port for cm6 and when gingerbread source code is released I could help port cm7. If you'd like to help me out and point me in the right direction please send me a pm. Thank you.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] RaverX3X:
do you understand

linux

c compileing

how to build a linux kernel

java

etc
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] FBis251:
Google is your best friend to learn. Try to learn a few if not all of the things Raver just mentioned on the post before this one.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] jorge89:
I don't, but I'll start learning those.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] Fluidification:
I thought of this a few months ago, but I thought I would be flamed. And everyone would be yelling at me. sure, I would CRT and Overscroll, but cm6 is beautiful, and I can theme it to make it look like cm7.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] camalus:
Please god someone do this. It's better than nothing. Ill donate $50 to get this done. I bloody hate stock.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] stephen_w:
I do, on the first 3 (very novice in C, though). Reading up on Java for Android now, so definitely lacking there. I'm more than willing to help with whatever I can in any way I can; not just with CM[6,7,...] but with whatever. I'm with jorge89 on this one. Props for volunteering.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] s15274n:
Two words.... "Why Hate?"

He did not request anything, he offered a great suggestion. He volunteered to help/learn. What more can you ask of someone?

Personally, I put more faith in getting our device into the hands of codeworkx or atinm.... I think once they have our device, we will get CM7. Having CM6 is certainly better than the TW version some people are currently running.

Nobody mentioned MIUI either.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] jglm4u:
People like him if someone teach them the basics they could be a great dev that will make sgs4g a better phone....I think a dev from any forum from any device should make a guide on learning on what raver says...or y not record A video when u making a rom and just put it on youtube ...users like me and him could learn from that....and when more people learn from that video the more dev we can have on sgs4g. ..;) just saying...!
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] RaverX3X:
no One was hateing krylon just pointed out valid facts yes we can get it running off a stock kernel running asop but it would never be supported or merged into nightles as it would break other builds

And no one wants to port updates manually all the time thats just insane
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] s15274n:
CM6 does not need to be updated, or even be official.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] krylon360:
CM6 would require a new dev box to be built. It's based on Froyo, once GB hit, Google changed the required files needed to build, these files changed in Ubuntu 10.10 repositories also. You would need to downgrade your linux install to 10.04 in order to build Froyo due to the repositories not responding on newer builds. It also requires an older install of java, sure, you can switch the java version within linux, but you would still need to downgrade in order for the repository with Java5 to respond.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] cybok0:
I agree with Krylon and Raver, just be patient, it will come.

If people are tired of stock than flash a ROM that isn't stock like Octane or Vallhalla.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] camalus:
Those are stock roms. They may be based on leaks... but they are based on stock roms.

They are basically just themed versions of stock.

Totally different than AOSP.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] cybok0:
I for one don't want to go back to froyo, I'll be patient and wait.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] RaverX3X:
Ok dont take this as a flame and im not getting mad just i am finding it hard to understand how it is so hard to comprehend that we need the source for the kernel to finish a asop kernel? Really handing the phone to another developer isnt going to get you cm 7 any faster. without source we cant complete a kernel for the verious reasion mentioned above not going to re itterate stuff thats been stated 40 times already not to mention we would have 0 ways to sign the kernel.. The best we can do right now is inject voodo and busy box to the kernels right now for ext 4 support and cwm and voodoo sound.... Most in part do to we cant sign our own kernels and to put it simply and the kernel cant be changed or it fails signature verification and wont boot......

krylon also stated what you would have to do if you wanted to remotly attempt going back to froyo and building cm6.... Honestly is it worth it not really.. The benifits of even a modified stock tw ish gb greeatly outweighs cm6 for froyo..

you say our roms are nothing more then themed versions of stock roms thats not 100 percent true.. They are based off the stock rom but thats about it

lets see stock

no ext 4

no themeing

no voodoo sound

no improved battery life

no lock screens

no init d

more bloat

no root

poor excuse for battery life (even tho stock gb roms actually got a little better at this).

no custom tweaked build props

and the list goes on and on

modified stock roms

themed roms ( and gasp u can actually change them if you want to spend the time to do so :P (this includes mms phones music players etc etc etc

init d support

ext 4 support

modified build props

way less bloat

root

the ability to change out kernels and modems :P

lock screens (prob goes with theming but eh)

voodoo sound support

cwm recovery

nanoid backup

bloating and debloating options u have the choice of what u do and dont want on your phone....

way better battery life

and the list continues i think i made my point

no ITS NOT ASOP

BUT ITS SURE 10000X BETTER THEN STOCK...
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] cybok0:
@raver thank you, you said it better than I could.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] TheKucho:
I guess it's a lost cause at the moment, seemed to me like Raver WAS the only dev who would actually attempt to make it. But I think he's been convinced that it's not worth it.

Still appreciate and love your work Raver.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] RaverX3X:
its not the work thats the issue its just the time that would be put into it doesnt add up to the benifits to me its just a downgrade for you all and going back for what? to say omg we got froyo cm6?