yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] nabbed:
With all due respect. I am entitled to my opinion.

Here it is:

No, thanks.

No, thanks.

No, thanks.

Agreed. This is why I flash cwm4 every time I need to back up/restore nand.

This is not a requirement to package a recovery with your kernel, unless you are just copy/pasting someone else's work.

I use these "****ed up" versions without any detriment and to my benefit, as they were intended to be used. I back up and restore nand.

As I explained a few times already, I am only asking to have cwm4 packaged with the kernel, instead of cwm5.

I never realized that it was actually such a hassle.

Why are you so against taking an older recovery, available freely from others in this forum, and packaging it in with the stock kernel?

If I knew how to do it, I wouldn't even be asking for it. I'd be done here.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Just_s:
Probably because you are the only one/one of the very few asking for it. Why are you opposed to flashing the CWM4 you want as you have been?

So, the rest of us should have to flash the CWM that works with E4GT so that YOU can have the CWM that works with the SGS2 packaged? Pretty ballsy demand imo.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] nabbed:
Thanks, brother!
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] AbsolutZeroGI:
No one should listen to you. You came to the IRC Channel where I pointed you to This Thread 3 times and told you to flash the "older version" which would give you cwm5 that backs up and read from internal storage. You responded by complaining about your problem AGAIN. Like dude, I fixed your problem and found you a kernel you wouldn't go *gasp* ALL THE WAY TO THE 2ND PAGE OF THE DEVELOPMENT SECTION TO FIND.

Here's what I don't understand. You ask a question...you don't get the answer you want here, so you go to the IRC channel and actually DO get the answer you want. What goes through your head when you decide to complain about your problem and ask the question a 2nd time? A third time? I posted that link like 1/2 an hour ago (which answered your question and fixed your problem) and, this very second, you're still complaining about your problem and asking your question...

If you don't read, we can't help. Sorry dude, that's just the way it is. Close your mouth, cut off your fingers...do whatever it takes for you to take a deep breathe and read what people are telling you.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] expertzero1:
you can afford a Samsung flagship smartphone, but you cant afford/buy a SD CARD? They are cheap you cheapass...

SHAKING MY HEAD :confused::confused::confused::confused:
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] musclehead84:
If u want cwm4 so damn bad package it yourself into a stock kernel. Why make demands. I don't understand hiw some people don't have an sd card. There are only a very few phones that didn't come with an sd card. Most people should have one. If u don't have one then don't bother flashing things.

Sent From My Evo Killer!!!
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] buggerritt:
SD cards are so cheap, I have 4 16Gb ones collecting dust on my desk. Two of them, I got for free. If you ask a Sprint tech really nicely in a Sprint store, they will probably give you one. They have a bunch of extras just floating around in the service areas.

You own a phone that retails for $499, has the fastest processor in a US phone, and you refuse to spend $20 or less on a card that could greatly enhance the user experience? This is very foolish IMHO.

So, don't. Who cares? It's your loss of data.

So, do it and stop being a such big ninny.

The nerve of some people's kids...

Well, just continue to do so, then

You expect people to jump at your beck and call? Are you serious? You know these devs are doing this for free, right?

Personal preference and knowledge. Maybe you should learn to do it yourself and then you can make everything just the way you want it.

Exactly. So, be thankful for what is offered.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] dtm_stretch:
How would I go about adding boot animation support to this kernel or is that a no go since it is stock? I have tried renaming the zip to sanim.zip and replacing the files.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] chris41g:
you can try renaming /system/bin/samsungani to anything else, or deleting it (dont recommend)

then renaming /system/bin/bootanimation to /system/bin/samsungani

then your bootanimation would be /system/media/sanim.zip
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] dtm_stretch:
Awesome it worked perfectly.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] makmoneynslp:
I had an evo and i still have ext 3 partition on my sd card is there a way i can use this with my ept4g
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] starnostar:
On stock, never once got an LOS in 2 weeks...on this I was getting LOS ever 2 hours or so, now im back to stock and not LOS in 2 days....

I really wanted to keep it as close to stock as possible with root/recovery, but I guess its back to stock until this thing gets figured out. I'm not taking my LOS-free stock experience for granted at this point.

Just thought anyone might want to know that someone (me) got LOS with this kernel.....
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] digweed4me:
This is stock pulled kernel only repackaged with cw5 so it means pure stock, i havent have a single loss with this. I am running viper 2.0 with this kernel/
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] chris41g:
then you have something wrong outside of the kernel.... this is the stock kernel, not built from source...
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] dallastx:
Some reason i keep getting MD5 hash value is invalid StockCWM5.tar.md5 is invalid. I downloaded it about 4-5 times thinking bad download. I can flash anything else but this in Odin. Any help would be appreciated.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] satur9ine:
This. I flashed this from completely stock and it has behaved exactly the same as stock. No LOS, butters.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] trekrfc:
quck question please, is this the 2.6.35.7-sph-d710.eg30-cl435734 kernel your talking about?

Im trying to fix a SGS2 phone. My friend tried to root his phone WITHOUT doing the reading first and used a I1900 kernel in his D710 phone from sprint. Needless to say its all messed up. Stuck in airplane mode with a bunch of other problems.

I cant seem to find the mentioned kernel anywhere. I was hoping to use Odin and reinstall the proper kernel and see if that fixes his issue, or at least get me on my way.

Didnt mean to hijack this threat if im in the wrong place, but if you did read it and have any ideas... Im all ears.

Thanks

BC
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Mr Ian B:
Is this kernel deodexed and does it support themes?

Thanks,

Ian B
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] amoricaorbust:
Will this kernel support the official CWM released by Koush? Can I flash new updates through ROM Manager using this kernel?
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] dmarden:
That's something to ask about a ROM, not a kernel.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] chris41g:
Yes, koush has my kernel for testing now... we were working et4g rom manager bugs out with this kernel earlier via twitter..
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] chris41g:
There is only one stock kernel relased by samsung for d710, and this is it, though repackaged with cwm..
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] expertzero1:
do i just zip the tar file so i can flash through cwm?
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] xlGmanlx:
Either flash with odin or use the rid yellow triangle method
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] trekrfc:
I bow at your feet. You just helped me turn a nice paperweight back into a phone. Thank you Thank you!!:D
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] trekrfc:
Chris,

Moving on, I want to delete the yellow trialgle. Will the method you describe in your other post: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1297999

Work with this Kernel? Last thing I want to do is screw up this phone again.

Thanks

BC
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] xlGmanlx:
You didn't ask me but I did do what your asking exactly and it works fine
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] Darkmx2000:
For some reason I cannot install the kernel from my phone? I'm trying to download the. Tar so I can put it on my computer to flash but it keeps saying error and won't download for some reason.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] barondebxl:
So all the other Galaxy S 2 have this nice bounce effect when you hit the top or the bottom of a page on the browser or menu or anything like that. The T-Mobile version gets the light blue. Anyone knows if we can get that bounce effect in the menu anywhere or do we have to root tand have a Rom that ads that feature? Thankguys!
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] Jjday7:
When root is achieved it will most likely come.
[Atrix 4G General] silver03wrx:
http://www.facebook.com/motorola?sk=wall&filter=1 click the link people like it and comment on it.

I have seen first hand proof of this working. I had an evo 3d. Htc decided all futre devices would have locked bootliaders well that made alot of people angry. Someone posted a thread on xda suggesting we let htc know that is not gna fly. So it turnd out thousands of people got on there facebook wall and twitter. Guess what the next day htc released a statement saying that they wanted too keep there coustamers happy and that the bootloader would be unlocked. They were. Id like to be able too have a device and not have too get a new one juzt because moto or htc or sammy wants too put them out constantly get people too buy them and then ditch them and out out another. The atrix is 100 percent capable of runing ics and theres no excuae for it l not too recieve it just because moto wants people too buy new devices every couple months. I know many many people feel the same way well as i said we have the power too change that if people would stop bickering and take it seriously. And also if moto started supporting devices longer not just bug fixes but the new android flavors. Id definately make my next device a moto it would do nothing but benefit them
[Atrix 4G General] silver03wrx:
try and get as many people as you can too do the same. It will make a difference.
[Atrix 4G General] turl1:
I'd wait until ICS is released. As things stand today, Atrix has the latest Android version available.
[Atrix 4G General] silver03wrx:
Yes that is correct how ever the atrix 2 is not a good sign for us. And it is a good idea too voice our oppinion before they stop supporting our phone if we do after really wouldnt have the same effect in my oppinion
[Atrix 4G General] Gutterball:
Yeah but the atrix 2 is a stepdown compared to atrix 1! :D
[Atrix 4G General] antiochasylum:
It's running 2.3.7? Thats news to me, also have people not seen the leaked videos? It appears to have all on screen buttons. Like honeycomb. Not sure it would work on the atrix. The screen is already small enough :-P

Sent from my Insanity powered SGS2
[Atrix 4G General] BravoMotorola:
The Atrix is really close to being officially supported by CM. Once ICS is released and the CM team makes their latest version (will be CM9) it will have ICS and will work with with the Atrix.
[Atrix 4G General] wintermute000:
re: official CYyanogen support, do you know this officially or are you speculating?

not being rude, genuinely want to know
[Atrix 4G General] ccrows:
I have no doubt that the Atrix "could" handle ICS.

The Nexus S is rumored to get ICS, and that phone has half the muscle of the Atrix...
[Atrix 4G General] elementaldragon:
.... i don't see what the idea of potentially spamming their facebook page will do (Didn't actually go to their facebook page... just read that's where your link was going to redirect). The phone is only 7 months old.... i'm fairly certain they're WELL AWARE that we want ICS. I mean wtf... look how much flak they got from every moron in the world when the Atrix was still running Froyo.
[Atrix 4G General] edgeicator:
They got tons of flak for promising gingerbread for the Motorola Milestone (gsm version of OG Droid) and then saying nevermind. Mind you, this was merely 1 year after the milestone came out as well. Gingerbread for the Atrix was inevitable. Not giving the Atrix gingerbread would be a PR disaster. What people fail to realise about a CM port of ICS to the Atrix is that if Moto decides to EOL the Atrix after only a year with no ICS upgrade, you lose out on updated drivers, kernel, and baseband. Sure we'd have ICS, but it won't run as well as a phone that natively has ICS.
[Atrix 4G General] ccrows:
You mean Froyo for the Milestone. They had to release it since they advertised flash on the box.

However the Froyo update basically killed the Milestone. Even Motorola put out a disclaimer that basically said the upgrade may cause performance issues.

The memory on the Milestone was perfect for eclair, but Froyo gave it a brain freeze... :(
[Atrix 4G General] antiochasylum:
Half the muscle? The humming bird chipset is far superior than the tegra. Just not clocked as fast. And the exynos chipset blows the tegra 2 out of the water.

Sent from my Insanity powered SGS2
[Atrix 4G General] ccrows:
Still the Atrix has the extra core which is supposed to be optimized in ICS, plus double the ram over the Nexus S...
[Atrix 4G General] silver03wrx:
I was not implying spamm there pages i meant voice our oppinion let moto know theres alot of people who like this device and we want them to continue its support. And if they do that would really be. In there favor id most likely choise moto for my next device
[Atrix 4G General] Wond3r:
Not so much

Froyo runs great on my Milestone, I heard GB makes it very sluggish
[Atrix 4G General] ccrows:
Froyo was the reason why I sold my Milestone. Eclair was smoothly, and for whatever reason I could never flash back to Eclair. Every time I tried going back, I got forced closed errors everywhere.

If the Milestone had 512mb of ram, I probably would still be using it since I really liked the build quality of that phone...
[Atrix 4G General] Wond3r:
I guess Milestones handled the OS differently than other
[Atrix 4G General] Magnetox:
Guys. The atrix is getting ICS.

Chill
[Atrix 4G General] ltdanno360:
god if ics is any better than the ics launcher in the market ill bee in heaven

cause this launcher is sweet
[Atrix 4G General] KingKuba13:
Thanks for the laugh.
[Atrix 4G General] edgeicator:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4910/motorola-droid-bionic-review-dual-core-with-4g-lte/7

hummingbird no where close to the Tegra 2. Exynos blows the water out of the Tegra 2 in pretty much every bench, both cpu and gpu-wise.
[Atrix 4G General] Sass86:
Cool. A chipset designed in 2010 isn't better than one designed in 2011. Samsung also built their processor so it should function higher with its counterpart hardware. Hey, I bet tegra3 beats exynos lol
[Atrix 4G General] edgeicator:
Stop trying to make up bull****. That's not how hardware works. The wifi/bluetooth module, audio codec, hdmi chip, usb switch, framebuffer controller, geomagnetic sensor, touchscreen sensor, etc. are all made by various manufacturers. It doesn't magically work better just because it's a samsung SoC inside a samsung phone. It's straight up faster. Period. What affects performance is the kernel, OS, drivers, and hardware. In single threaded performance the Exynos will still outperform the Tegra 3. Tegra 3 uses the exact same cores Tegra 2 does. The ONLY thing Tegra 3 does is add 2 more cores, clock the cores slightly higher, use a slightly upgraded gpu, and adds a 5th ULV core just for when the phone is not in use to save power. And guess what? The vast majority of apps only use a single thread. So in day to day use The exynos should match and/or exceed the Tegra 3 in performance. Next time, try and research some facts before running your mouth.
[Atrix 4G General] silver03wrx:
Well said..
[Atrix 4G General] lilhaiti:
Actually, all three (Exynos, Tegra2 and Tegra3) use the same A9 processor cores...as a matter of fact so does the OMAP4's. The biggest differences are the GPU's and the memory channels. In day to day single threaded operations, all of the chipsets should perform similarly with the major performance factors being the ROM and kernel that are installed.

And just my two cents on Atrix ICS...I don't think we will see an official ICS released for the Atrix...it doesn't make business sense for Moto with the Atrix 2 launching. I mean we are still running on a froyo kernel with the official Gingerbread. And with Nvidia getting ready to launch Tegra 3, I don't see a whole lot of support coming that way either.

Unofficially I do believe we will see ICS some day. I think that CM or some other port will make it to the Atrix.
[Atrix 4G General] :
Interesting, I hadnt heard about the T3 yet.. But five cores in a phone? Thats nerdy even for me lol. Does it come with five batteries to compensate for those cores? I know I cant be the only one who is happy with dual core, I mean, I never have to wait for anything and I never have any lag of any kind (except att's ****ty data that has nothing to do with the dual core).
[Atrix 4G General] G-Man.:
I really wish people would stop starting MORE threads about ICS... Just stfu already!! We'll either get it or we wont. BooHoo. If you want it THAT bad - get in line to buy the new Nexus Phone being launched with ICS. otherwise STFU. be happy with what you have.
[Atrix 4G General] edgeicator:
Except no. It's the same architecture. A9 is an architecture for the core, not the actual core. Apple designed their own SoC for the 4S, which also uses the A9 architecture, and it was manufactured by Samsung. The Exynos and the A5 are 2 very different SoCs despite being based on the same architecture and manufactured by the same company. Just a look at the benchmarks.

Even though the tegra, omap, exynos, and A5 are all A9 based, keyword being based, SoCs, their performance varies in CPU tests. A9 is similar to sandy bridge in that it's an architecture, but not a chip in and of itself.

---------- Post added at 05:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:18 PM ----------

It's a quadcore version of the Tegra 2, an upgraded gpu, and a hidden 5th core used for powersavings. When the cpu isn't needed, it switches to the 5th core which is underpowered (500MHz clock), for battery savings. This happens without the the kernel or OS knowing.
[Atrix 4G General] Phoneguy589:
On the Samsung Galaxy Nexus site there is a sign up page that asks what carrier you'd like the phone in.....The more At&t customers that fill it out maybe the sooner we can get an ICS based phone on our network. After it's here, maybe Cyanogenmod can start a CM9 build once we've gotten "officially" recognized.

I'm not going to lie, I'd like to get the phone but the sooner it's here the more devs can try to port it.
[Atrix 4G General] edgeicator:
Getting the Nexus sooner on AT&T has nothing to do with how fast we get an ICS phone on AT&T or how fast it gets ported to CM. All of that solely depends on the ICS source code being released, which should be in about 2 weeks time when the nexus is released worldwide.
[Atrix 4G General] silver03wrx:
L

First of all no one cares what u think second im sick of people like u. If youdont like the thread dont read it. Did someone not love you enough or tell you your special growing up poor little fella things will probobly get better for you
[Atrix 4G General] G-Man.:
Good for you. Doesnt change the fact that there doesnt need to be 100 !@#$ing threads on the SAME thing.... people need to learn to read/search before they post. The forum RULES should be one of the things they read...
[Atrix 4G General] ranova:
oh sweet, we got a "maybe" prediction:

http://www.androidcentral.com/will-my-phone-get-ice-cream-sandwich

funny thing is that the Atrix 1 probably will have a larger user base than the Atrix 2 will ever have... OG for life
[Atrix 4G General] edgeicator:
I seriously doubt it. The primary reason the Atrix did very poorly was it's high price point. The Atrix 2 is starting off at a more affordable 99 on contract. Atrix sold poorly, so they refreshed it with a revision hoping it will boost sales.
[Atrix 4G General] Dabrego123:
This thread should be renamed: Lets complain about each others chipsets. Nothing to do with porting ICS to atrix 4g.
[Atrix 4G General] sipjca:
I have to agree this bickering is all bull****. Who cares if a chipset is faster if it works then I cool. This is coming from an android dev and general hardware nerd too.
[Atrix 4G General] Sass86:
You sound like a fanboy... I said exynos was newer and performed better than tegra 2, but tegra 3 will be better. With samsung building their phones and SoC it seems reasonable they would perform better, even if not all the hardware is from them. As for "running my mouth", you speak tough from behind a keyboard lol. As for the apps, that's like saying they haven't been modified for better graphics and performance in the past. You sound like someone just **** in your cherrios. Exynos is great, tegra3 is better, and you know it.
[Atrix 4G General] ccrows:
Can we please close this thread already?...
[Atrix 4G General] silver03wrx:
I started this thread hoping people would come togther and let motorola kjow we want support to be continued for the atrix. And it really would make a difference its been proven and was done with htc unlocking bootloaders but people seem to just want to argue which is not helping in anyway come on people we have an opportunity here tell motorola not too abandon the atrix. Who cares about what processor is better.
[Atrix 4G General] edgeicator:
Yup, because slapping in 2 more cores of the EXACT same specs will somehow outperform an SoC that already beats it in single-threaded tasks. Here's a clue. Extra cores mean jackall in single-threaded tasks. Zip, zero, nada. Tegra 3 literally uses the exact same cores as the Tegra 2. Maybe you should try doing some sort of research before making up your facts.
[Atrix 4G General] rewen:
Why are people comparing the Nexus S to the Tegra. Who cares.

I've had both phones, the Atrix does seem snappier, but I'd rather have the Nexus S back. The Atrix has a crap screen. Terrible colors. I miss yellow.

And the Atrix screen is also probably the reason it doesn't excel as much as you'd think, when compared to the Nexus. It has to pump more pixels so unless the benchmarks were done using the same res then you can't even compare the results.

C'mon ICS. I'm trading my Atrix back for a Nexus S lol
[Atrix 4G General] malickie:
Simple fact is Most apps don't really take full advantage of more than 1 core let alone the OS bogging the Devices down still. I am guessing GB does Not take full advantage of more than 1 core and if the OS doesn't take full advantage than No app is going to be able to take full advantage and show the performance gains correctly. That is an assumption so I could be wrong.
[Atrix 4G General] Sass86:
Your quite annoying, you are claiming you have facts on a SoC that isn't released yet. Tegra 3 will be clocked at 1.3ghz - 1.5 ghz per core. Thats the same is it? The 2 extra cores help us do this thing called multi tasking better, but you knew that. The 5th core is clocked at 500mhz and is only used when phone sleeps to save battery power. I refuse to talk gpu with you because tegra 2 has better gpu right now, exynos 4212 MAY match graphics of kal-el, we'll have to see. Basically exynos 4212 for smartphones should probably be slightly quicker in performance, but with less graphics and multi tasking power. Projection scores and actual performance are two different things. I am done with this pointless argument...
[Atrix 4G General] Sass86:
That's why we want ICS, its made for multiple cores
[Atrix 4G General] malickie:
Yup :) I was making the point that the Benchmarks are not True of what the devices can do yet considering the OS doesn't take advantage of the cores so software can't actually make True Benchmarks yet. So really every app to check Benchmarks and what not is currently not 100% accurate.