[LG Optimus 2x] spica1234:
Truth which I kept mm always

There are some wrong misleaded puposely spreaded informations are written about me like painting me as a GPL Violator. If somebody has the rights to write False Infomarions about me then I definately has the rights to give clarifications about what is right and what is wrong.

as inreference of http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=32997245&postcount=1752

Okay, first of all, we'll see which sources I've not released.

-All the sources prioror to RC12 was/is in this repository https://github.com/spica234/HP-Krnl-2.6.32.9 all the sources were full only till RC11. RC12 has two more additional files added include/linux/spica.h and lib/spica.c that RC12 patch as mentioned in below line released seperately.

-RC12 was introductions of OTF, its changes was attached in main post http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1295486 in attachments as .patch file. As per GPL if anybody makes changesto sources then he needs to release CHANGES not CHANGES WITH FULL SOURCES like http://algo.ing.unimo.it/people/paolo/disk_sched/sources.php. Creating a patch file is also valid as per GPL,

-Now moving to SR3R. 1st of all SR3R is not only SR3R sources as descirbed, Instead of using the same old repository I merge one by one changes in my PC since RC1-12 in V20Q sources on mp PC, then made SR3R related changes and pushed them to git as a new Repository https://github.com/spica234/HP-2X-V20Q. And instead of re-committing every changes through RC1 to RC11 which was already mentioned in https://github.com/spica234/HP-Krnl-2.6.32.9 , I mass-commited by using 'commit -a' option provided by Git, There is nothing wrong is mass commit for eg. somebody upload it as a whole zip where there is no commit, that's why git has given this option. So SR3R is not only SR3R Sources.

-Now all the SuperSonic TBs till SS13's sources were updated on git as new repository https://github.com/spica234/HP-TestBuild-Repo-upwords-Sr3R, Which clearly mentions sources after SR3R, Now instead of committing each and every changes since RC1-SS13, changes were mass-commited by using git mass-commit options as TB Sources. So if it's mass commited that doesnt mean There is no changes in between SR3R and TB sources. By observing both sources by using diff command it clearly shows the changes those were made post SR3R. Mass-commit is nothing wrong, otherwise Git has removed it. And by mass-committing public commit will always show 1 commit if all changes were mass commited in a new repository. So no public commits doesnt mean sources were not released nor it means GPL has been violated, If I've uploaded same sources of SR3R as TB without including TB changes then it violate GPL, Instead of mass-commit many developers(including HE) has released his sources as ZIP file so where are the public commits inthere?

Okay as i said sources upto TB13 was uploaded in https://github.com/spica234/HP-TestBuild-Repo-upwords-Sr3R and has been verified by senior moedarator, So here half the story ends with proof TB sources till SS13 was uploaded on May29th on https://github.com/spica234/HP-TestBuild-Repo-upwords-Sr3R and mass-commited as "HP Post Sr3R2 TestBuild Sources"

Another wrong statement:

"6 commits to cover 22 publicly published releases (while each release should usually have at least 1 commit otherwise there would be no changes)"

Most of the kernel related changes were done during SS1-SS13 as found here https://www.dropbox.com/s/npxnecvwyr7lv4o/SS.patch ,I've created this patch by using diff by comparing TB source from git repo to SR3R Soruces, there were significant changes made (more 60-70 changes not 6, affected files 80-90) during SS14-SS22. you can confirm the same by downloaidng sr3r and TB sources and comparing them. they're mass-commited in rest SS Seriies(SS14-SS22) changes were mainly done in toolchain but not in kenrel itself which will have less commit as there were no kernel related changes.

Now moving next about rest of the sources and only 6 public commit.

-HP SS14 changelogs you can find here(Note the date, post has not been edited by me) http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=27402340&postcount=6083 , Read the changelogs, . Rest were toolchain specific changes, I did clearly mentioned in changelogs about ToolChain specific changes at that time.

-HP SS15 Changelogs http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=27914679&postcount=6289 .Toolchain specific changes and used old freq table in kenrel

-HP SS16 changelogs http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=28135280&postcount=6374 Toolchain specific changes, and re-included v21y nvrm daemon

-HP SS17 Changes http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=28545280&postcount=6612 there is only one kernel related changes that was FUSE oriented changed cpu freq https://github.com/spica234/HP-Test...mmit/8d4ac4fce457406a920a709d6e5ca63d4eb92003 other was toolchain specific

-HP SS18 changelogs: http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=28662418&postcount=6653 Again toolchain specific changes

-HP SS19&R http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=28978328&postcount=6741 ToolChain Specific kernel specific https://github.com/spica234/HP-Test...mmit/6ffd06ee6cdbd6a3b25a12eac4f9f3569c2c31d9

-HP SS20 Changelogs : http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=29157469&postcount=6761 Toolchain specific and init.d file specific

-HP SS21 Changelogs:http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=29247111&postcount=6782 ,changes kernel specific https://github.com/spica234/HP-Test...mmit/aa2056bfc592a6fbf71a0909dbefb8d08824e5eb

-HP SS22 changelogs: http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=31703489&postcount=7062 Toolchain specific changes, One only kernel specific changes were not uploaded to git that was of HP Pro RT Scheduler as it was instable in alpha stage and i dint finished writing it.

PLUS somebody purposely wrote it wrong that there were no changes since 23 july-oct-19.

Wrong false purposely written statement

"this means at least all the HorsePower releases between July 23 and today (October 19) are completely closed source (and the previous builds are only covered by partial commits)"

I last released SS22 http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=31703489&postcount=7062 18th sept after that i released no kernel as i was busy in my assignments and project work. I dont know why it was falsely purposely written 23-july to oct-19? lol Do i've to submit my assignments and projects of my master thesis education to git ?

Although there is no requirement to release sources of tools(aka toolchain) used to compile open source softwares ,Now as I've completeld optimizing toolchain I've released informations as well for other users to build toolchain binary such as source used gcc-linaro and flags used to build toolchain http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=33162446&postcount=1 instead of releasing pre-compiled custom toolchain

It clearly stated that I've not violated any GPL Policies and all the below purposely written public statements are FALSE and written completely for a wrong purpose of abuse http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=32997245&postcount=1752 These all statements are false and written for the purpose of abuse. and i wonder still his post is there?

Either I should keep mmmm and accept wrong claims or i should clear the truth and flase ,Every time i've stayed mmm and accepted everything wrong but this time I'm clarifying whats truth and lie, that's what i did.

Anyways, This guy has wrote wrong statements and i've just given clarification of what is truth. if he has done nothing wrong by posting wrong info about me then I dont think i've done anything wrong by letting you guys aware what's truth and flase.

I want peace, I am tired of everytime these being started

as always

Now i wont reply to such topic if he ever starts back and whatever false info he writes in future:)

Sorry english is not my native language, I wrote this post without aggression and in cool mood, no other meanning it has.

never mind:)