yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[HTC EVO 3D] planet_x69:
The can and do seize property for prostitution, drugs and pretty much any VICE. They seize bank accounts and personal property and have done so to innocent people. Domain seizing is NO different.

That they failed to grasp that the shut down order would affect thousands of innocents is truly tragic and those domain owners should sue and rightly so for loss of brand and income especially in the light of the fact that the seizure was for child porn. I cannot and don't condone their technical failings.

That is our system like it or not. The Government can and will screw up but that doesn't mean it has unlimited resources or knowledge, its usually quite the opposite, they have limited funds and resources, and far too often take the wrong way down a one way street.

They rarely ever apologize for being stupid. You usually have to sue them, and that's the sad part.

Don't like it? vote for real substantial change. I know I have.
[HTC EVO 3D] Papa Smurf151:
Lol we see how that whole hopey changey thing gas worked so far. Lol jk
[HTC EVO 3D] TimidRat:
Quoting Palin is a good way to lose respect. lol
[HTC EVO 3D] Papa Smurf151:
Lol I never saw anything wrong with Palin. Now Obama is a different story
[HTC EVO 3D] TimidRat:
Never saw anything wrong with Palin? You're kidding right? She can't even raise kids without one getting preggers at 16. I hope you're messing with me.
[HTC EVO 3D] Papa Smurf151:
U ever had children let alone teenagers. Can't control everything ur kids do. Id rather have her ass in charge than the horrible person in power now. Nothing like socialism and big government
[HTC EVO 3D] TimidRat:
What has Obama done that Palin could've done better? I'm sorry but i despise that woman, and the thought of her as president makes me shudder, although it would be a good way to get the few people who don't hate america to hate it. No, i don't have kids, but i know if you're a good parent, talk to your kids, even buy em condoms if you have too, they won't have a baby at 16, Sarah Palin's too much of a redneck republican to even accept the fact her 15 yr old is ****ing every guy in town, so she would never get her condoms, apparently in her eyes ignorance is better than protection.
[HTC EVO 3D] Papa Smurf151:
U r ignorant as ****. Obama's a socialist little ****. Passing socialized medicine and bringing our country into a ****hole. If u don't have kids the stfu. U have no clue what ur talking about. I'm not gonna get into a political debate on a phone forum. Its not worth fighting with retards
[HTC EVO 3D] TimidRat:
Did someone not have their Wheaties? You have proven nothing except that you are a psycho. All i did was say my opinion, everyone's entitled to one, and you don't have to have children to have an opinion, and actually i do know what i'm talking about. Congrats on making yourself look like an ass! I can tell you've gotten far in life with that redneck attitude of yours. ;)
[HTC EVO 3D] Papa Smurf151:
I'm a redneck why? Cause I can't stand a liberal socialist Democrat. What let me guess u voted for him cause of color and ur need for entitlement. And yes u r more than welcome to have an opinion on how to raise kids but if u have no experience than ur opinion is ****. As for Palin as far as I know her daughter that got pregnant was not whoring herself out. Again ur options of a person is based off ur ignorance. I hope one day u have children and they r they most unruly of kids and one of them ends up pregnant or getting someone pregnant at a young age. As a parent u can try and instill values and teach the best u can but in the end its impossible to control everything they do especially when they r teenagers. As for the political aspect of things...uve proven urself extremely ignorant and obviously a liberal with the mental capacity of a uneducated thug. No need to carry on ur opinions cause they worthless
[HTC EVO 3D] planet_x69:
i think she has milf qualities....just so long as she keeps her mouth shut :p
[HTC EVO 3D] Runnin_IT:
Wow, speaking as a parent - did you REALLY just wish this on someone? Who does that? That shows a level of ignorance that is hard to comprehend. I try to stay out of political **** here, but wishing this kind of **** on someone's kid is beyond just political...
[HTC EVO 3D] felacio:
So when did XDA become a political site?

You instigated this argument by making fun of someones political view and then dropping some pretty ignorant Fox logic.

So.. how about all the political talk just stop and get back on topic.. mmkay? Nothing I hate more than people feeling the need to throw their beliefs into **** that has no place for it. Seriously, grow up and except that people have their own opinions.
[HTC EVO 3D] xHausx:
yay for generalizations and automatic labeling of people who you don't agree with, we've all been trained very well lol
[HTC EVO 3D] TimidRat:
Woah buddy, if you want to make yourself look ignorant, you shouldn't do it where everyone can see. You've proved to everyone you're a racist who gets angry for other people having opinions. You should turn your words aroung, cause you're the one acting like an ignorant thug, you can't even spell and i'm uneducated? This is pathetic, i'm done arguing with you cause you obviously can't think with an open mind, you're just like every other racist hillbilly from the south, always thinking your right although you have nothing to support your statements. Guess what? My generation's gonna be running this country soon, and we're not gonna tolerate the bigotry anymore. People like you should be in jail, i only pray you don't have a gun out of fear you will kill teenagers for having different views. Honestly, re-read what you wrote, and if you still think you aren't making yourself look like an ass, then, well, actually i don't know, if you still think you're debating like an intelligent adult after reading it, then i feel sorry for you. Pathetic. This is my last comment about it, back on topic.

I can't really see how this surprises everyone so much, i would be surprised if it was opposite, and they weren't watching..
[HTC EVO 3D] amace04:
Ah the joys of being canadian.

I ran this on my phone, gives me Rogers address. Ran it on my home connection, and I get Shaw's address. No personally identifiable information whatsoever.
[HTC EVO 3D] ckoadiyn:
Yay go Canada lol
[HTC EVO 3D] krankdroid:
in Denmark. My results just show the network provider company.

i was expecting to see the address of danish intelligence services

if i had paid to **** bricks i would demand my money back..
[HTC EVO 3D] SteelH:
You all do realize that the DoD essentially invented the internet? Started out as ARPANET, a communications system developed for the military to communicate.
[HTC EVO 3D] ckoadiyn:
One word yes
[HTC EVO 3D] cdg52:
One google search

www sprint com/business/products/categories/popup/popupDodOverview.html

www sprintdod com/

Sprint does a lot of ISP stuff for the DOD, DOD isn't watching us Sprint just manages the IP's
[HTC EVO 3D] geeknik:
Because there is a SHORTAGE of ip address in the ipv4 space, lots of places are giving their unused ip blocks back to ARIN for re-assignment and it's quite possible that ARIN hasn't updated their database to reflect this. The Dept. of Defense is quite possibly the largest owner of ip address space in the world. :) This is pretty much a non issue, and has probably already been mentioned, but I didn't want to read through 10 pages of 'OMG Big Brother is spying on you!!!' posts. =)
[HTC EVO 3D] LiquidSolstice:
;) Was just about to say this. IPV6 adoption will hopefully get a move on.
[HTC EVO 3D] tommymsw:
LOL

you guys are ALL insane! I mean how can you have so little understanding of the way the world works?

How is that giving up our privacy? Can they see the pictures on it? Hear the phone calls? And this is in NO WAY going to prevent terrorism... how could it?

And even if they COULD hear the calls, people could hear people talk to one another since the dawn of time!

People hate cameras on streets too... because somehow they think that without the camera, nobody could see them before by just looking at them! I see people walk down the street and I hear people talk on the phone every day! Big deal!

We all have license plates on our cars? Is that conspiracy?

We have deeds to our homes and we are assigned a property address? Is that a conspiracy? Does it stop terrorism?

Our credit cards have our names on them. The phone company has our names and addresses... not because BIG BROTHER wants to watch us (why would they?) but because this is the way the company BILLS you for the service.

You guys are confusing "running a business" with stupid movies and blogs you read.

There are millions of people in America and that means you would need millions of people to monitor each person. And as EVERY one of us are NOT working for the DOD checking people's phones, it is likely NOBODY is doing it! I mean think about the man hours and workforce you are talking about? And why? To catch the one in a billion person who is plotting an attack? You could win the lottery 50 times before that would work.

You guys watch too much TV. lol

we have been keeping track of this stuff WAY before there was a DOD. Record keeping is human nature!
[HTC EVO 3D] TimidRat:
Okay, so you think the government doesn't care and doesn't watch its citizens? I hope that's not what you think, I agree with everything else you say, but too think the government doesn't care too watch us is just naive. I already tried to make the point it would be impossible to monitor everyone but noone listens.
[HTC EVO 3D] tommymsw:
What is "The Government". People say that as if they are some aliens from another planet. WE are the government, any American who takes the job. Do I think a firefighter keeps an eye out for fires? Yes. Do I think police officers check to see if people are speeding? yes. Do I look at that is "big brother"? no.

Obviously the DOD will investigate people they suspect of being criminals, that is their job and we all want them to do that. But the idea that they are looking at ME randomly in the idea that they may be lucky and find somebody? That is absurd. Like I said... you could spend a lifetime and never find anybody by "cold" eavesdropping.

But the main point of this is that having your IP address be listed as DOD would have absolutely NOTHING to do with invasion of privacy nor would it help in ANY way to prevent terrorism. No matter where you get your IP address from ANYBODY can see who owns it. I just didn't see the relevance. Who cares if it says DOD, FCC, or McDonalds?

I think people get freaked out before they think about if they should or not. I am not saying people in the government never do anything wrong or illegal. I am just not going to make the jump to "They are watching us all".

I can appreciate anybody having concerns. We should. But they should always be logical concerns.
[HTC EVO 3D] ckoadiyn:
I agree sometimes everyone gets freaked out before they should but I would rather people be slightly paranoid about stuff then the majority of people not caring or or trying to see both sides or diff perspective. I feel most people are to stuck in their own tiny world. But that's just my opinion.
[HTC EVO 3D] TimidRat:
By "The Government" I mean agencies like the DoD, CIA, FBI, ETC. And i completely agrre, i thought you were saying that they don't really watch anyone. And it is beyond absurd to think they're watching us all, as someone stated earlier it's probably something along the lines of an algorithm searching for keywords. I also believe you're right that everyone is too quick to freak out, this thread didn't surprise me at all, haha, like you said, who cares if it says Dod, FCC, or McDonalds, there is no way they could possibly monitor everything that everyone does, there just isn't the manpower, we'd probably have to employ 20% of chinas population to achieve that, cause there sure as hell isn't enough people in the U.S. to do it.

Sorry i misunderstood you at first, you cleared it up now, and i hope everyone in this thread will see your post and be like "Hey, that makes a lot of sense." People are too quick to freak out, sometime's i am one of them though, but i only wear a tin foil visor, i'm not completely crazy. :) lol
[HTC EVO 3D] xHausx:
Slight correction here, the Department of Defense is in charge of national security and our armed forces while the FBI and homeland security are in charge of finding criminals and terrorists in the states. Although I would be surprised if the DOD didn't get tapped to help since they're in such a great position to do so.
[HTC EVO 3D] nawlage:
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Sent.
[HTC EVO 3D] ch1naski:
I'm sure they're watching this thread now, what with all the "trigger words" we've thrown out there. doh! Now they know that we know that they know. Dammit.

Warm & cozy.
[HTC EVO 3D] Bamba1260:
Wow, some people are too easily persuaded by the 'too protect against terrorism' propaganda. It's sad really.

I am just going to leave this here for you guys to think about...

Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.

Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759

US author, diplomat, inventor, physicist, politician, & printer (1706 - 1790)
[HTC EVO 3D] TimidRat:
I'll make it worse: Taliban, 9-11, Nuclear weapons of mass destruction, Al Queda, anthrax, hijacking, pilot manuals, CIA, crack Rocks, Apple, iPhone, iOS.

I think the last three in particular are the worst. lol
[HTC EVO 3D] ckoadiyn:
LOL wait sadam, bin ladin, hijack airplanes, BOMB, c4, white house, pentagon.

Edit: assassination president. Lol
[HTC EVO 3D] davec1234:
This explains the black choppers outside, I have to go now.
[HTC EVO 3D] LiquidSolstice:
Be careful, Bruce Willis will be waiting for you ;) (Top Gear reference, if you know)
[HTC EVO 3D] efan3719:
haha thought this was going to be a serious thread. *looks at last page* nope.
[HTC EVO 3D] RulingCzar:
Bricks = Shat
[HTC EVO 3D] TimidRat:
Read the other pages, we realized bricks should not be shat over this.
[HTC EVO 3D] TeknoJnky:
What are you talking about?

The government *is* watching everyone, they even made a TV show about it just for added plausible deniability.
[HTC EVO 3D] TimidRat:
Oh yeah! My bad, sorry I forgot the Dod enslaved billions of mole people to monitor every phone in the U.S. lol
[HTC EVO 3D] ckoadiyn:
No in the show they have computers listen and see patterns its called person of interest its a good show
[HTC EVO 3D] JT114881:
1984 is here...
[HTC EVO 3D] sydlexius:
...In light of the Snowden Leaks...

How prescient do posts like this from 2 years ago now seem? Perhaps someone needs to reach out to the NY Times or the Guardian to rattle Sprint's cage over this?
[HTC EVO 3D] Westnile:
Just a quick reference for people new to this arin.net is a good resource for looking up IP addresses
[Vibrant General] ibous:
The I9250 just passed through the FCC as a pentaband phone with both T-Mo's AWS bands and ATT's bands.

http://phandroid.com/2011/10/08/samsung-nexus-prime-gt-i9250-passes-through-fcc-with-t-mobileatt-bands/

This is my next upgrade path if it comes to fruition; so here's to hoping.

What about the rest of you?
[Vibrant General] }{Alienz}{:
You didn't look at the FCC sheet did you.

IT IS MISSING the 2100 frequency band...aka...T-Mobile 3G/4G WILL NOT WORK. This phone is not a T-mobile-banded device. At best it is the international version...maybe AT&T's one as second best but not T-Mobile's. Sadly I don't think we're getting this awesomeness for some time still. Sucks.
[Vibrant General] ibous:
You are mistaken. The FCC does not need / can't test the 2100 Mhz band as those frequencies are used for the downlink i.e. the tower is emitting and the phone is only receiving. The phone emits RF energy on the 1700 band since this frequency band is used for the uplink in the AWS-1 spec. The FCC is checking to make sure the RF emissions from the phone conform to regulations so they test 1700Mhz and don't care about 2100Mhz as far as the phone is concerned. mmmkay? This is not a phone spec-sheet, it is simply the FCC test results.

The phone shown on that FCC summary WILL MOST DEFINITELY support full t-mo 3G and ATT's as well. It's similar to many of the recent Nokia phones in that respect.
[Vibrant General] }{Alienz}{:
Wow hats off to you because I totally forgot about that. FCC really can't/doesn't need to test downlinks. Yay for new T-Mobile nexus then haha?
[Vibrant General] movieaddict:
it wont be coming to tmobil for awhile guys! as its a v exclusive first, sorry
[Vibrant General] xriderx66:
Jizz in my pants
[Vibrant General] Vibrant03:
Thanks for the info.. After reading the other guy's post, It was like the end of the world, thanks for giving us hope! LOL..

this is how I was before the Galaxy s came out, I'm excited about something again! LoL
[Vibrant General] SamsungVibrant:
One thing has me worried about the Nexus Prime, the size!

It is nearly 4.7 inches. Maybe possible to still keep the phone small since the buttons are built into the OS/screen, untill I saw the leaked videous. If the phone in the leaked videos is really the next Nexus, it is HUGE and has a bunch of wasted Bezel space at the bottom. Size alone is a huge factor, I can't carry around a huge phone. :(
[Vibrant General] }{Alienz}{:
Look at the dimensions from the FCC.

124 by 68mm.

For comparison the vibrant is 122 by 64mm.

The nexus IS BARELY bigger than the Vibrant. I'd say the size is perfect. The lack of those physical buttons apparently really makes a difference.
[Vibrant General] SamsungVibrant:
Thanks, I guess that huge black area of the bezel on the bottom on the videos is misleading if those dimensions you stated are accurate.

Gosh I want this phone, release it already! It better come to T-Mobile and not months from now! How much do you think it will cost at full retail without a contract? I hope not more than 500.

On a side note, if it uses the same PowerVR SGX540 as our Vibrant, that goes to show that our Vibrant still has a lot of power, at least in the GPU area. Nexus should have used a better GPU, but it's ok!
[Vibrant General] gun:
For those who still don't know how Bands work:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UMTS_frequency_bands

FCC tests only US bands for US market. So they always skip IMT Band (2100) even though it is present on the phone.
[Vibrant General] Emama:
+1 :o

Cant wait about it..
[Vibrant General] accordex:
http://news.punchjump.com/2011/10/08/samsung-nexus-prime-final-specs-deploy-in-new-report/

5Mp Camera? Not 8?

1.2 Dual core not 1.5?

1,750 mAh battery? Thought it was supp to be in the 2000?

Is this true?
[Vibrant General] طوني تبولة:
Google, please let me pre-order this phone NOW.

Does it really matter? can you see the difference?

It is a phone camera, don't expect real 8MP from an 8 MP phone camera. I mean even those compact cameras sensors are very small (little finger nail-size) and you can't compare their pictures quality with the ones from SLRs.

To me, 3MP is enough, more than that is a waste of storage space for a photo that is taken by a camera phone. My previous Vibrant camera had always been set to 4MP (Wide mode).
[Vibrant General] degeneration:
That's coming from BGR's old rumors... Newer rumors say otherwise. Either way I don't see why people get their panties in a knot without any official word. Anyone could, potentially, release rumors of whatever they wanted.
[Vibrant General] accordex:
Yeah it seemed weird, but it was dated OCT 8...didn't make much sense seeing as the Amaze has -the better ones- those specs and that phone is days away from launch...

And no I cannot tell the difference between 5-8MP couldn't care less...point is android phones come out with the newest hardware..always...so it seemed strange to have a camera that uses 2 year old technology is all...
[Vibrant General] gun:
Verizon version is supposed to have lower specifications than GSM version.
[Vibrant General] degeneration:
I might have not stated it too clearly but I found an article talking about how other articles are just digging up the rumors from the BGR article from forever ago.

Maybe that article was just optimistic and thinks the other ones were wrong, maybe it was right and the other ones were wrong. I am waiting until the phone is announced and Google (or the manufacturer) tells me what the specs are. I have no requirement to decide right now what I want to buy.
[Vibrant General] boystuff:
i'm pretty stoked, i thought about the Hercules, then was like hell i'll grab a gsm version of the sgsII HD then bam find out the Nexus Prime is a Boosted version of the SgsII HD, with stock android 4.0... can't beat that, straight ota updates from google, no twiddling my thumbs hoping my phone gets updates before my TV does. actually now that i think about it my samsung TV has gotten more Network updates then my Vibrant lol.

also who needs a 8 MP camera? anyone here gonna print out Billboards? that resolution seems silly. 5mp with a better lens and hardware is more then acceptable for a phone. you want to do true to life digital photography for business get Nikon, Sony, etc. Digital SLR.

---------- Post added at 04:39 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:36 AM ----------

last i checked it was a dual mode phone, capable of both CDMA/LTE and GSM/HSPA very similar to the Verizon Droid bionic, sim slot for travel and cdma here on VZ's networks

also as far as specs and Rumor's go i find GSMarena/Phonescoop to be the best two sites for updates and near accurate information.

http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_google_galaxy_nexus_i9250-4219.php

camparison between SGSII HD and Nexus Prime

http://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=4219&idPhone2=4198
[Vibrant General] SamsungVibrant:
wait, Verizons Droid Bionic has a sim card slot for GSM? It works with T-MObiles 3g bands?
[Vibrant General] gun:
At this moment everything about Prime is a story without confirmation. The only concrete thing is a picture of the profile and ICS. This's it.

SEOUL (Reuters) - Samsung Electronics Co said on Monday it had delayed launching a new smartphone based on Google's latest version of Android operating system due to the death of Apple's co-founder Steve Jobs.

Samsung planned to introduce the new product based on Ice Cream Sandwich system, which will unite the Android software used in tablets and smartphones, at its Mobile Unpack event in San Diego on Tuesday.

"We decided it was not the right time to announce a new product while the world was expressing tribute to Steve Jobs' passing," a Samsung spokesman said.

Samsung has yet to decide the new date for the release, the spokesman said.

Jobs death on Wednesday, following a years-long battle with pancreatic cancer, sparked an outpouring of tributes from world leaders, business rivals and fans.

Samsung is the biggest maker of mobile phones based on Android, which is available for free to handset vendors such as Motorola Mobility and HTC Corp. Android phones have a greater combined market share than Apple's iPhone, the world's best-selling smartphone.
[Vibrant General] shoerhino:
To me, it seems strange that Google would plan to announce the launch of their new nexus phone but because Steve Jobs died a week earlier, they decided to postpone it. I'm not trying to be cold but a week is enough time and while I could understand why Apple would delay their events, I'm suspicious of Google's motive.

Personally, I think that the Nexus Prime is further away than we expect, either due to technical reasons or all the carriers didn't want to launch the Prime on the heals of the SGS II. We haven't even seem an videos or demos of the Prime and it's usually at least a few months between the that and the release. Notice as well that they haven't even rescheduled yet....

My guess is that they miss Christmas and it comes out in January.
[Vibrant General] Supremancy:
Since this is a "google" phone do they get profits off the sales price along with they get for it being android??

If this is true, im sure they will release it on all carriers to maximize profits. With the Iphone moving to all carriers, phone exclusivity is dead.