yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Entropy512:
In theory, max shouldn't matter - however 500 will act as a "defensive measure" against misbehaving apps.

Priority doesn't matter until you set multiple profiles.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] shoman94:
Another useless post. He needs logs as he has stated MANY times.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] posthold:
My log is a couple of pages back. I was just stating that I was on stock voltages when it occurred. I failed to mention it when I reported the SoD with the log...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] jasvncnt1:
Good Morning. As always thank you again for your time and help. Greatly appreciated.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] AllFlasher:
Dont undervolt or overvolt and I have never had any issues with any of your kernesl. Just wanted to say thank you for your hard work.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] smknutson:
Entropy, saw you mentioned me a few back. Just wanted to add that I'm on 3/7 and have had ZERO issues. No crashes or SoDs whatsoever.

Tried 1/24, and it was stable. Been in a crunchtime at work, haven't had much time to do anything but work, commute and sleep. I tried 3/7 and, for me, has the best combination of battery and performance.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Solkamman:
On the other hand my phone loves the gpu 3 step and I consistently see better screen-on battery life and zero stutter or lag, much less any SOD's.

3/5 has been working great, but for some reason battery performance dropped on 3/7, even though (if I'm not mistaken) that's when you turned down some of the gpu voltages.

So many variables though, but it is fun to grasp for that holy grail combo...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] :
I've seen a few people say they prefer 3/5 over 3/7. I wonder why the difference in performance due to lowering the voltage?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Solkamman:
Yeah, didn't make sense to me either, and it took a while to admit...tough to stay impartial when I'm using software of which I have a very basic level of understanding.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Entropy512:
Doesn't make sense, unless somehow ExTweaks/the customization scripts didn't like the change.

If you are not using ExTweaks - the change to the defaults MIGHT not take hold unless you wipe out /data/.uci in recovery or manually change the voltages in exTweaks

https://github.com/Entropy512/linux_kernel_sgh-i777/commit/c56b1415c16d99d4b77a5f2de8d56a125fd6a58b

and

https://github.com/Entropy512/initramfs_sgh-i777/commit/05ace4648cf2bd3a941522fdd7a0834d51ed0d82

Are the only changes in 3/7.

Can't figure out why 3/7 is stable for smknutson, if anything the changes to voltages should make 3/7 less stable...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] :
we like to keep you on your toes, it makes you smarter. :D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] smknutson:
Can't explain it. Although I am back on Sh1trom while before I was on UnNamed. But my usage habits haven't changed.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Entropy512:
I wonder if there's something about UCKK6/UCKH7 that the newer source base doesn't like... I think nearly everyone who had stability problems was on an AT&T base.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] howtomen:
Im not awaiting ics from u :D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] SeanHacker:
@Entropy

your friend (source) decided to drop. its time for you to go to Disneyland. :D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] hlb3:
I had an SOD on 3/7 with stock voltahe this morning while my plugged inti the charger. I didn't have time to.mess with getjng logs since my alarm on my phone didn't go off and I was 20 min late for work, but I will see if I can get them next time if it does it again.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] glitchsys:
International Galaxy S II kernel source just dropped

As I'm sure you're all aware, The International Galaxy S II kernel source just dropped. Please tell me our AT&T devices are close enough to the International version that you can do something with this?

Are we one step closer to a 100% stable bug-free ICS (or CM9) running on our i777 phones? Or are our phones different just enough that it's (the international kernel source code) almost useless until a specific OEM ICS ROM is released for our phone and they release the kernel source for our phone [in which case, thanks to AT&T, we're probably many many months away])?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] alacrify:
Please read or search at least a LITTLE before you ask questions.

And nothing is 100% bug free - ever. Other than that, yes, this is what they needed (which one search or about three pages or reading would have told you).
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Entropy512:
When it's ready - the ICS kernel WILL have its own separate thread.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] :
Im curious as to what the ICS thread name will be called. Ive gotten so used to the Daily Driver name.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] mattdm:
You should call it Entropy's Ice Cream Truck. ICT is a nice acronym...

Get it? Truck? Driver? Daily Driver?

...

Nevermind.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] ryude:
Entropy's Double Dip lol
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] rav4kar:
Why not same way all his fans like ''$hit Kernel"
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] mattdm:
I'm just waiting for someone to come out with Neapolitan ROM. You know it's coming.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] dandrumheller:
$hit Sandwich Kernel? 'Cause you'll eat it, and like it!! :-)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Quadra_Slam:
It doesn't matter -- you will rename it whatever you want to anyways! :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Entropy512:
Probably just Daily Driver - only difference being [ICS] in the thread title...

I use the "****ty" names for kernels that I blind-develop.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] NJGSII:
That works. Being into cars, I like the term Daily Driver.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] smknutson:
Cannot wait.

Literally.

:banghead:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] vladm7:
me too, but as with the past presidential election - high hopes from public often (predictably) dissolves by average results (see ICS impression thread from 9100 forum) - so don't keep your hopes too high to not be disappointed then.

I think it will take some few iterations for Samsung to get things right with ICS.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] rav4kar:
I smell politics...do i? ;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] loughary:
@Entropy512

I am amazed at the skilled developers that we have in this community it's unbelievable. Your time and efforts are truly appreciated.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] herofmm:
USB connection failed on DD kernel/Stock romKK6

I don't know whether this is known issue and there are a quick fix, but I see failed USB connection to my notebook. USB worked before flashing DD kernel, and it also worked after I reverted back to stock kernel. I am using stock KK6.

Is it KK6 related problem? or is there a quick fix? Thanks

p.s. Never mind, 2/28 version works fine. It was 3/7 version which caused UBS issue.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] DeXel55:
As I mentioned before, I started to experience crashes starting from 1/2/12. I have been running 12/8/11 since my last post here for 4 continuous days and haven't experienced any problems (so definitely not hardware failure). I also flashed 1/24 as you suggested and got crash to LPM today. Well, I will be running 12/8 until you release ICS kernel :) (I hope it won't have these problems), unless you feel fixing this :rolleyes:. Thanks!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] shinji257:
I got another charging power off last night. I also managed to get the last_kmsg as well. Don't know if it will be any help. This is on the 3/5 kernel. Never updated to the 3/7 one. Filesize exceed forum limit so I just put it on paste bin for you.

http://pastebin.com/SdyyGyCM
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Entropy512:
WIll look tonight.

For log files too big, you can zip them BTW.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] clumsywob:
Entropy, is there a thread for your ICS kernel?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] tylercarter:
not yet.....
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] jazzboyrules:
Hi Entropy,

I am trying out SHOman2 RC5 which has your ICS kernel #164.

I faced 2 SoDs in within 10 minutes.

Here's the last_kmsg:

http://db.tt/u5pB8I8j

(I posted this here because I think that we still don't have the DD ICS thread)

Sent from myphone.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Entropy512:
There is no DD ICS thread because I am not accepting stability bug reports because I KNOW IT IS UNSTABLE. THAT IS WHY THERE IS NO OFFICIAL RELEASE YET!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Jank4AU:
I think he was just trying to help out, man. He didn't mean anything negative by it.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] alacrify:
I think he touched a sore spot. We're not letting Entropy work on it and answering all the mail is dragging him down. Releasing what he did was a favor so we all just have to be patient while he figures out the nagging stuff (I know you know that, just sayin').
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Entropy512:
Seriously, I've said over and over there's a nasty stability issue I'm working on, and there's lots of discussion of it in the siyahkernel thread.

I don't need last_kmsg dumps for bugs I can reproduce with no effort.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Entropy512:
bah i'm gonna have to get standard ramconsole working instead of this sec_log ****

Need the error checking

this is such an annoying bug
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Entropy512:
I think it may have always been there. Cog Beta4 includes the last kernel release I put out before adding standard bootanimation support. If the kernel sees /system/media/bootanimation.zip, it'll use this as the bootanimation instead of the stock Samsung .qmg format one.

On my machine, only a few seconds. I assume you mean this one for flashing?

adb shell dd if=/sdcard/zImage of=/dev/block/mmcblk0p5
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] DevilDogAK:
Can't wait for your latest update. Running your experimental kernel and it works great!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Freddy2Fred:
Which kernal should I use for overclocking and performance?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Entropy512:
Why don't you try reading the first post in its entirety and making a decision based on the feature list whether this is right for you?

I realize the feature list is a little disorganized right now, but it's not THAT bad.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Entropy512:
Update release 10/16 - Miscellaneous bugfixes, ramconsole (/proc/last_kmsg) support, NFS modules compiled into initramfs (/lib/modules).

Note that the ramconsole /proc/last_kmsg entry will only appear if there's a log to pull, so:

1) It won't be there on the first boot of this kernel

2) It won't be there if you fully powered off

3) It should be there if you did a reboot or the kernel rebooted itself.

If you ever have an issue with a spontaneous reboot and you are not overclocking or undervolting (SetCPU profiles to reduce clock when screen is off or battery is hot is OK), pull the contents of /proc/last_kmsg and post them here.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] mcorrie1121:
I've read it twice and I may be missing something, but OC is only listed as being available in the "doom" version. There is no "doom" version attached anymore, V2 or newer.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] phonic:
If you read the first post, you will see under "Current Features" that OC/UV has been supported

since

the 10/07 doom release. If you read the posts in this thread, you will also see that it has been confirmed to be working since that time.

As new features get added to the kernel, those features get added to the list of "Current Features", generally with a version that they got incorporated into (such as the three most recent 10/16 ones). While no features previously incorporated have been removed (AFAIK), I imagine that if that occurred, the corresponding feature note would be removed or annotated in the feature list.

While there is an experimental and stable kernel, those are the only two version trees that exist right now, and the primary difference is the version of the kernel, not the feature set.

So if your goal is OC/UV (both of which the developer has made it abundantly clear is at your own risk and without support), either one should work for you. His recommendation is to try the experimental kernel first, and only go to stable if you need it.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] mcorrie1121:
Thanks, I missed the part where OC'ing was integrated into all releases. It used to be doom only.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Entropy512:
If I yank a feature, I'll post it - otherwise, assume that if a feature was present in a previous version, it will continue to be present.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] SeanHacker:
@Entropy

Just wanted to drop in and say what a good job you're doing on these kernels bro. keep it up!!!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] nyydynasty:
+1

10char
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Entropy512:
Thanks man - and thanks for the great ROM on the 10.1.

You probably noticed I'm a bit behind on ROM updates, too busy with the GS2. :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] roadrash7:
What is everyone using to undervolt. Control freak crashes and voltage control is limited. Im on dd 10/16/11 exp. Is setcpu the only one that works
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] eep2378:
If you read the OP, and have been following this thread, OV/UV questions are sort of frowned upon in this thread. Entropy has already stated that he included OV/UV capability mainly because people "wanted" it. It's in big red font in OP if your wondering. Also UV with the SGS II may yield negligable improvements in battery life(i.e it may not be worth the bother)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] nyydynasty:
i find that UV'ing doesnt help much (or at all) with battery life...unless you're OC'ing, then you might need to do it to stabilize your phone.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] roadrash7:
Thanks but it doesnt say anything about what to use to UV in the op. It only says do not report bugs or problems, i dont have either. I simply wanted to know what to use because it doesnt say what to use. It only says what to use to change the governor. So as i had no clue cause it didnt say and VC and CF didnt work which is all i thought there was to use for UVing i thought this would be the right place to ask.

Anyways i figured out setcpu works. I didnt know this cause i havent used it in a very long time and i dont think it always could adjust voltages. Thanks though for the extra info. Wouldnt be a bad idea to say what to use in the op though since its a feature and VC and CF dont work. Great kernal working smooth thanks
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] mjgspr95:
VC is working smoothly for me. OC'd and UV'd stable on non-experimental kernel.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] eep2378:
Voltage Control and SetCpu should both work fine. Also I think he doesn't provide any info about what to use mainly because its a feature he may not have wanted to include, were it for others. Furthermore, he probably doesn't want the thread turning into, "what are your UV settings" thread. Every device is different and it would diminish the threads purpose.

That being said, happy undervolting :p
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Entropy512:
I test with SetCPU, VC should work.

sysfs is sysfs...

However, you must be VERY careful to reset VC to defaults and remove any scripts it put into init.d if you change to a kernel with different frequencies or a different voltage control mechanism. Some Infuse users that came from a different kernel got completely hosed up by the init.d scripts.

SetCPU is more "graceful" here and detects changes, resetting to defaults when it does.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Simba501:
Need some help.

I use widgetlocker and it has an option to wake the device with the volume keys. However, on the GS2 (and Captivate), deep sleep seems to cause this not to work. I've had other devices that could use this option and still get good battery life. My question is this - could the kernel affect the ability to use this option? I'd like to know because if it does affect this, swapping kernels (currently on the original codework kernel) could be the key to helping me achieve waking my device with the volume keys (with widgetlocker).
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] jazzboyrules:
I am sorry, didn't mean to aggravate you. I saw this as the best communication channel to you and so I posted it here.

Had I known that ICS kernel bugs were banned from getting reported, I wouldn't have.

Thanks.

Sent from myphone.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] JordanElliott:
give entropy a break guys. He busts his ass off for us. And I know because I came from the infuse. No offense to the devs there. But he was thr only one that stayed for us. And helped us out of his heart. I guarantee u he's not getting near as much money as the work he puts into this.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] JordanElliott:
Could somebody be so kind to post the kernel from 12/8/11
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Simba501:
http://db.tt/afeJgx4r

Sent from my Galaxy S II (i777)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] JordanElliott:
just asking cuz i didn't see it in first post. but does this have voodoo lagfix and vodoo sound?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] :
Jordan its been known that the SGSII does not have the sound chip that allows for voodoo sound....

and there is NO NEED for voodoo lagfix...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] alacrify:
You can get Voodoo louder - that plus DSP manager should cover your needs.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Virus1x:
Thanks entropy for your help and suggestion that on stock the most recent daily driver was best
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Virus1x:
I'm using most recent kernel and I'm using battery like a mofo in standby anyone know a stable dd kernel or should I flash back to stock? Or will I need to wipe my phone again?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] JordanElliott:
12/8/11. Try it
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] seanpr123:
Truth, I ran that all the way until I switched to ICS last week.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Virus1x:
Anyone have a link for this?

I don't see it posted in this thread.

I really went through 10-15 pages I don't wanna sift through 240 pages
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] seanpr123:
Not positive this will work but I uploaded here:

http://www.2shared.com/file/mZKUFJH3/DD_120820111.html
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Karashta:
I know this isn't the right thread or even on topic but I just wanted to thank you entropy for exposing me to zombie ass!

sent from my magic shiny box using the tap tap tap
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] JordanElliott:
Just a fyi. I flashed the 3/4/12 kernel. Its the best one that is most current
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] sam1forever:
The 3/4/12 kernel. Not the 3/4/12_B right?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Waggles:
Just wanted to report in, been running 3/7 for a week now, getting pretty good results. Battery life does seem to have improved in standby/sleep mode, I assume due to the 3/4 change (previously I was on 2/28).
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] JordanElliott:
I flashed 3/4/12 cuz I don't want gpu Control. So ya. Release a
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] JordanElliott:
Could somebody tell me the default voltages for gpu and charging are? Im on ics and cant flash back at the moment cuz im not by my pc
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] alacrify:
Sorry, wrong kernel.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] JordanElliott:
For this kernel? Are they the same as neak?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] JordanElliott:
Im talking about this tab on this kernel.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] alacrify:
Sorry, I thought you were still on AOKP. That's the only ROM I've got right now.

Gotta stop multitasking (badly) :D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] JordanElliott:
Ya i am. I just think the voltages for neak are wrong compared to entropys
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] alacrify:
Entropy may correct me, but I see no reason the voltages on a completely different kernel would need to be the same as Entropy's voltages on a Gingerbread kernel. Have you tried looking in the CM9 gits for Entropy's input to that? Or for that matter Task has the CM9 kernel packaged separately in the thread now - you could just flash it and look.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] JordanElliott:
Will u still be updating this kernel? Since when the ics source drops we can use it on ics?

---------- Post added at 08:40 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:13 AM ----------

like these commits:

https://github.com/simone201/neak-ics-kernel/commits/master

https://github.com/Entropy512/linux_kernel_sgh-i997r/commit/75a22934b2ad18d190153a4ac60c4638390ffc89
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Edgarhighman:
Mmmm I'm using the 3/07 kernel on unnamed 2.2.1 uckh7 GB - is this safe? My wifi doesn't go blue when I enable it (it stays gray) and my gmail associated with everything on phone cannot log in.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] alacrify:
Sounds like you didn't flash a kernel cleaning script before flashing the kernel. Leftovers will do that to you. Search on jivy26 kernel, I don't have the link on tap right now.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Edgarhighman:
I went from 12/12/2011 kernel to 03/07/2012

The only reason I didn't run a cleaning script was because I figured it would undo some tweaks of the unnamed rom (zip align, odex, deodex, w/e that stuff is)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Entropy512:
Maybe nuke /data/misc/wifi/* - could be due to the wifi permissions changes needed for UCKK6 compatibility. That said, I don't remember anyone having issues back when that wifi change was made in 12/21.

Or reboot your router... My ISP (Time Warner) did janky **** to me last night, had to reboot EVERYTHING in my damn apartment.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Root-Maniac:
Sorry for the noob question, done tons of reading, what kernel should i flash when rooting my phone to get wifi working?? im using this guide http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2KhSKpt4hs and the kernel he says to use is not listed, also i plan on flashing ics, so does ics come with its own kernel meaning i can skip that step and just flash a rom after i root?? thank you so much in advance!!! buying my sg2 next week! :) :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] alacrify:
You've probably been here, but always good to reference: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1511838 - as far as kernel, the only answer will be "whichever one works best for you". If you're sticking to GingerBread, then Entropy or Siyah are both good choices - OTOH, I can't use the Siyah kernel because my phone does NOT like it.

If you're looking at ICS ROMs, the CM9 kernel works fine, and the N.E.A.K. kernel works fine if I tweak it a bit (and it's FAST) - Siyah still doesn't work. The one downside with NEAK is that it strips out a lot of the diagnostic logs (dmesg, last_kmesg) so if you're working on tweaking your phone it's not as friendly.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Nuskul:
Ok guys its been so long since I rooted my s2 originally. I'm having a senior moment. Buddy just got an s2 and wants me to root it. Can I Odin this kernel to get root and CWM. We get spoiled by cwm to flash something every day. I just can't remember how to get it originally.

Yes I did search and think this right just need a little reassuring. Thanks

Sent from my CM9 controlled I777
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] mattdm:
You can, but you shouldn't. Doing so will trip the flash counter. You should use Odin to flash the stock with root package from this thread, then use Mobile Odin to flash Entropy's kernel.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Nuskul:
If I Odin this and then use a jig to remove yellow triangle does that also reset counter

Sent from my CM9 controlled I777
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] alacrify:
Yes.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Nuskul:
Thanks guys, did further research and will see which bootloader his phone comes with whether or not the jig will work. If not looks like he'll be purchasing triangle away after I flash Cm9 for him.

Thanks again

Sent from my CM9 controlled I777