yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] superleeds27:
Yeah, im having problems. Had two screen freezes now, asin touchscreen been touched results in nothing, wont inniate oir anything.

Had to basically hold the power button for about 20 seconds for it to turn off.

Using SmartAss V2, Screen off profile 100-500

Anyone else having this trouble?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] :
I would never use profiles with smartass, ondemandx or interactivex, but that's just me.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] raziel19:
have you tried it without any profiles set?

EDIT: to slow :p
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] superleeds27:
Okay, any reason why?

Also whast the difference with the x on the end of ondemand and interactive?

Whats your current setup etc?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] cbeckstein:
doesn't SmartAssV2 do this Screen off 100-500 automatically?

maybe that conflicts with your setting this profile?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] superleeds27:
Will try it now, tbh, it has always been when trying to awake thr phone it ha happened!
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] :
because smartass, ondemandx, interactivex have 'integrated' screen off profile AFAIK.

Profiles are useful with ondemand or interactive.

My current setup is 100-1200 with ondemandx, no UV, stock ROM, but had one reboot.. with smartassv2 I usually run 100-1400, no UV, without any issues.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
I have taken out v1.7.8

I think some of you have missed my post about v1.7.8 is not stable and should be considered as beta.

I will release another version which explicitly states that v1.7.8 is beta.

those who do not want to have lockups or try a newer version should stick to v1.7.7
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] :
any other changes in 'new' beta or we can keep current one :)?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] bgx:
Till now, for me beta runs better than 1.7.4 wich I run before...

No wlan problems till before and no random freezes... and snapier than 1.7.4 ...

I'm happy with it... ;-)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
the new beta will be more stable than the latest unstable version :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] :
hehe, OK :) 'unstable' for some :p
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] PedroMRP:
gokhanmoral in final version of 2.6.5 will you keep SLQB as the memory allocator?

Speaking for myself I think in terms of battery that SLQB is better then SLAB.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
it will be either slqb or slub
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] :
have a look here regarding an explanation for governors and anything else you need to know

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=19846319#post19846319
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] alferret:
High battery usage due to Android OS

Just want to add something (havnt read all posts obviously as it would take weeks lol) Anyway I was suffering very high AOS and short battery time with CF's root, went to Siyah 2.6.2 & it dropped down to <10% tried N.E.A.K went back up to >60% in 24 hrs, put 2.6.4 on & now it is less than 5%

So if anyone is suffering high AOS usage the this kernel is the way to go.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] xuxuzao:
I am feeling the kernel much smoother without the thunderbolt! script.

Using miui + siyah 2.6.4 + thunderbolt + screenscale_state (bouth with latest releases)

Tried ondemandx, lulzactive and ondmand with SIO.

With none of them i felt that smothness..

should i use it without the scripts? How about battery life without?

I really enjoy my battery with the script!

tks
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tolis626:
Pikachu01,I think we have problem with Thuderbolt!.Let me explain.

I was using Thunderbolt,but I only had the init.d scripts and I had tweaked those a little,but today I decided to get the whole pack and see how it goes.After I flashed 2.3.5(didn't bother with screenstate scaling yet-probably won't either),I went to S98system_tweak to change some parameters about readahead(my SD card is particularly fond of 3072kb :p ) and saw that the script was like...well,half.Much of the script was missing.I thought it was a bad download and redownloaded and reflashed.Same stuff.I then downloaded from my pc,transfered it to the phone and flashed for the third time.It did the same thing.Then on my PC I unzipped your CWM zip,and pushed the script with adb.It did the same thing after a reboot.I cut the script in half(made two scripts,each with half of the first one's lines of code),but the same thing happened to both scripts,albeit fewer lines were missing.After that,I made four scripts and pushed them with adb.Now it works like a charm.Might want to look into that.Or maybe my phone was drunk or something. :p
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] N6666661:
damned itnt it a Siyahkernel thread????
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] blaex:
My battery drain in deep sleep is acceptable with 2.6.4, less wakelocks like an previous siyah versions, compared to speedmod s2-18 and Phenomenal 2.0.

but the battery drain while using the device is pretty high compared to previous versions.

my current Setup (referencing to the attachment):

CPU-Governer: lulzactive

IO-Scheduler: bfq

-50mw each cpu step, except 500mhz.

my lulzactive-advanced settings:

inc_cpu_load: 90%

pump_up_step: 1

pump_down_step: 2

Screen_off_min_Step: 5 @ 500mhz

up_sample_Time: 40 000

down_sample_time: 40 000

anyone noticed the same or has different experience with lulzactive, please post :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] linutech:
Hi,

Very good work.

Thank you very much.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] It_ler:
Results for SpeedMod / Phenomenal / void / N.E.A.K. / Siyah / stock kernels

Everything is specific to my phone, my "normal" usage and my home location. Most values are exact results, but some are rounded. I usually have wifi, synch (three email accounts, calendar and news), Google Talk and Skype on.

For all custom kernels, I was running on Frankenstein XWKL1 ROM (Modem: XXKL1).

For stock kernels, I was running on the corresponding stock ROM.

Always using the Samsung's standard / stock 1650mAh battery.

I just flashed Siyah v2.6.4 (out-of-the-box => no manual customizations / on default settings) and have run some benchmarks.

Here are my current results:

Benchmarks

Battery stats

My first impression of Siyah v2.6.4 kernel is: It is very stable, smooth and extremely configurable. CWM Manager app is fully supported and I have never seen more settings to configure in voltage control app on any other kernel ...

Thanks gokhanmoral for that brilliant kernel !

I am running battery test right now and will post my results as soon as all my tests are finished.

P.S.:

As I said before, I am running with default settings only - so nothing customized/optimized yet.

Just to get better comparable results (for different kernel versions) which can be reproduced easily.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] supercurio:
It_ler Impressive.

I would add that a system with better interactivity tend to have lower scores in RAW benchmarks.

Which means more is not necessarily better ;)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] TecQuality:
@it_ler: thanks for sharing!
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] EyeTech:
I have observed something similar. I was editing the main thunderbolt script today to make it run with the Siyah 2.6.5 beta1. I found that when I opened the script with almost any text editor (including the one built into script manager) only half of the script was loaded. But if I used a viewer (not editor) I could see all of it! Eventually I found that db text editor (comes with dropbox app) would let me load and edit the whole script.

I have no understanding of this finding.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] It_ler:
I absolutely agree.

For me, the subjective feeling that a kernel is smooth is much more important than a higher or lower benchmark score.

I list such benchmark results only for interest as some users tend to draw their conclusions from these results.

My focus is more on battery savings - on my phone using my apps and settings with my "normal" usage.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] TecQuality:
guys, someone could share me the 2.6.5b1? i can't find out any link for this.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] EyeTech:
It's a few pages back

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=21028786
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] supercurio:
Yes and battery life are rare − and take a long time to do in an accurate way so kudos for your work.

If I interpret the values correctly you proved that the factor that has the most importance is usage ;)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
v2.6.5 is up.

I removed experimental changes in cpufreq part. so, it should not be unstable as 2.6.5beta.

however, I enabled hung task detection. so, if you experience random reboots see http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=21055629&postcount=15846
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Milchbeck:
2.6.4 is the best Akku and very smooth for me! No toutch a very good runing system ;-)

Send with Tapatalk: Galaxy S2 CheckRom HD v4 2.3.6+2.6.4 Siyah + ICS Domination v1.7.2
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] PedroMRP:
I'm now facing an dilemma... using ThunderBolt! or not... because with these release using ThunderBolt! is almost useless. Now I'm only using the darky_zipalign script and it feels so smooth and responsive.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] grey77:
I guess its a temp. deep inside the chip; u cant feel it just by touching outside.

Radeon or Geforce chips heat up to 100C degrees.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] omeryounos:
Awesome.....just flashed it.....so far so good 2.6.5....
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Szaby_88:
That's what I thought ...

I'm just flashing a new ROM so I have to scratch :P

Anyway ... thunderbolt isn't yet compatible with the newest release anyway :)) Will take a few days.

But back 2.6.5 release ... doesn't this it implement thunderbolt as well? I have seen something in the changelogs with thunderbolt I'm sure...
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] mavixda:
same here with ondeman-sio :eek:
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] PedroMRP:
It implements only a part of the Thunderbolt!.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] veyka:
I just had 3 hard lockups in a row with 2.6.5, one with UV/uc two with none.

Using rom on my sig plus newest thunderbolt.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tolis626:
Yeah,but still 90C would melt the **** out of the phone.It's plastic,not metal.

And Radeon and GeForce are GPUs with a size that exceeds the GS2's size,with bazillions of transistors,with very high clocks,independent cooling etc.They are built to withstand suc heat(maybe even more).
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Szaby_88:
So if I want full thunderbolt! I need to have version 2.6.4. Oke then!
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] PedroMRP:
NO! If you want to have full ThunderBolt! you need to flash the ThunderBolt scripts independently of the Siyah version.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Szaby_88:
Oh my bad. Miscommunication.

I ment that because the newest Siyah is so new .. that Thunderbolt may not work very well on it. (Some posts above me someone just mentioned that they have had hard lockups with that combo.)

What I ment was: thunderbolt! scripts would be (more likely) compatible with 2.6.4 then with .5. So my train of thoughts where: flash .4 to be able to flash thunderbolt! without any problems.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] omniwolf:
no, thunderbolt is not so reliant on the siyah version.

thunderbolt is made for like 5 different phone models, all with different kernels. it should work fine on siyah 265

[edit]

nope, i'm wrong. thunderbolt 2.3.6 has been released to fix incompatibility with siyah 2.6.5. download it here:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1296927

[/edit]
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] HellRazorGod:
White lines on right side of screen

Is it just me or you can see white grain lines on darker backgrounds appearing on the right side of the screen. It appears only on siyah's kernels lately. Since the 2.6 series I guess. Earlier siyah versions didn't give these lines in the screen. Any ideas?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] John E Dante:
Found a solution, nothing Kernel connected.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tolis626:
Did you check your IMEI etc settings?Maybe your EFS partition is poo-poo.In that case,just hope you have a back-up somewhere.

If it's not an EFS issue,it's more likely that it's a rom issue or hardware(maybe the SIM card?) than kernel.Maybe also try reflashing modems?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Dennys_Santos:
Before buying the application Control Plus Voodoo would like to ask a question:

It is true that the module "Voodoo Sound" does not work in "Galaxy S2" even after you set this kernel (with module support mc1n2_voodoo) ?

Someone could confirm me?

Thanks guys...
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] ajvulcan:
Voodoo control plus doesn´t work with galaxy s2.... for now and maybe forever. Because voodoo sound is impossible to make it work as the sgs2 audio chipset is a **** and for voodoo colors supercurio is actually working in other app (as he's told me reciently) for that purpose (Voodoo Screen Tuning R&D).

Regards.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tolis626:
Of course it's true.Voodoo Sound was for the Galaxy S which has a completely different(and better) DAC.For the Galaxy S II all you can do is use Supercurio's Voodoo LOUDER,which only amplifies sound so that it sounds,well,louder.Don't actually expect quality improvements.And for Christ's sake,don't buy anything that's related to Voodoo Sound(Unless you want to support Supercurio that badly-that'd be acceptable).
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] ctomgee:
Did you figure this out? Because what you're saying above (that you don't have /system/etc/init.d, but you DO have /etc/init.d) doesn't make any sense. The "/etc" folder is a virtual mapping to the "/system/etc" folder. In other words, they are the exact same folder.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] raptorjesus1337:
I must apologies in advance for my relatively nooby amount of knowledge and question.

I recently got Android for the first time in the form of S2 and I rooted it soon enough using Odin and the CF-root method. I wanted a custom ROM so I went for CM7 but since alpha of CM9 is out, I upgraded to that instantly. I've been on it for a couple of days and plan to stay that way since its superb but regardless, it lacks one feature - the ability to turn off soft key lights.

A fellow XDA member forwarded me to the MIUI Q&A thread where he had found this script:

I had also tried BLN control before but I didn't really understand how it works (I thought that BLN integration depended on the ROM rather than the kernel) so I looked around and found this kernel. Since I don't care much about the other tweaks or advantages, I was just happy to see that this has BLN support and so I went ahead to install it.

I backed up in CWM, flashed cache & dalvik using "Kernel clean up script" by hawker. Moving forward, I then flashed SiyahKernel 2.6.5 (I got it from the website) and tried to reboot however after the default Samsung screen, there was no boot up animation and even though I left it for a while (~ 10 or so minutes), nothing happened so I assumed I had done something wrong. Factory reset, flashed cache & dalvin again using same script, flashed the kernel and then flashed CM9 (with GApps but thats irrelevant). This time it booted normally so I went ahead and restored my CWM backup and all was fine.

However, when I moved the script to my SD card, I didn't get a notification (about the soft key lights) like I should've and so I downloaded BLN control and it says that BLN isn't installed.

I apologies again for the noobishness and the fact that I've poured out my life story but I'm really baffled by this whole deal. In fact, I don't even understand why this is called a kernel since I thought kernel is only installed when you're cf-rooting so according to this view, I would be installed a kernel on top of a kernel.

Anyway, hope someone can enlighten me.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] stevehkim:
this kernel doesnt work with cm9.

tweaked - by me

kernel - siyah the og

rom- me you eeee.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] raptorjesus1337:
Oh...

Thanks for the answer. I had my suspicions but I didn't want to believe it.

Well, since it doesn't work, can I delete it just by factory resetting and flashing CM9?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] HellRazorGod:
*White lines on right side of screen

Is it just me or you can see white grain lines on darker backgrounds appearing on the right side of the screen. It appears only on siyah's kernels lately. Since the 2.6 series I guess. Earlier siyah versions didn't give these lines in the screen. Any ideas? All the videos have disbanded colors coz of this
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] JPxM0Dz:
Phone powers on boots automatically when charging ever since flashing to 2.65, anyone else ?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] droidphile:
Put these lines in one of your init.d script. It sets the brightness values to almost exactly the samsung defaults. Your problem might be solved.

echo "30" > /sys/class/misc/brightness_curve/min_bl
echo "1" > /sys/class/misc/brightness_curve/min_gamma
echo "24" > /sys/class/misc/brightness_curve/max_gamma

Also see if different gamma sets in supercurio's Voodoo ScreenTuning app can further eliminate the issue.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] radicalgel:
Ok so 2.6.5 feels super smooth. Thanks a lot gokhan. Small doubt, i'm on criskelo and I noticed the init.d folder was empty, however I want zip align, so is it enough to just put the S70 darky zip align script that is bundled with thunderbolt into /etc/init.d/ and reboot or do I need to do something more to get the script to work?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Necrolust:
Using siyah kernel with cm7, does anyone getting the phone being awake for no reason all the time? Stock cm kernel does not have this weird problem.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] HellRazorGod:
Didn't work. I'm pretty sure it's kernel related coz it doesn't happen for any other kernel. I'm surprised no one else noticed this. Here are screenshots of the problem
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] ka2uki:
2.6.5 super smooth..thanks..@gok..
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] JmPTaz09:
U don't even have to factory reset, just flash cm9 again and it will overwrite the kernel with the one it comes with.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] JmPTaz09:
P.S. 2.6.5 running great on my sgh-i777
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] torchedlh:
sorry for the newb question but i searched the thread and the rest of the forums....

Is this compatible with the i9100M? Is the i9100M identical to the i9100 when it comes to compatibility of kernels/ROMs?

Thanks!
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] pikachu01:
2.6.5 doesn't seem to work for me. Launching any games will hang it. Also, there's no last_kmsg file in my /proc.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] ka2uki:
work well here,maybe clean up the init.d files. wipe the phone,and then do the tweak again will work out the problem.

来自我的GT-I9100 使用XDA高级版 发送
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] pikachu01:
Yup. 2.6.5 isn't compatible with ThunderBolt!. I'll work on it now. :) For now, refrain from using it. Sorry about that.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] pikachu01:
Tested 2.6.5b1 retrospectively after removing ThunderBolt! and sure enough, it didn't hang. I'll release a ThunderBolt! version with the fix for the hangs :) Sorry about that!

Hey gokhan, the experimental CPUFreq is not the cause for the hangs. I'll research some more and get a fix out soon.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] damnreaper:
+1 on these.. me too
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] EyeTech:
If I'm running checkrom and 2.6.5 without thunderbolt, what files should be in my init.d? as I need to do some cleaning.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] omeryounos:
I'm also on checkrom v4.0 with Siyah 2.6.5, It should be following.

02modules

05modules

90ram-tweaks

98mounts

99complete

s95zipalign

---------- Post added at 10:03 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:58 AM ----------

Strange..I'm on check rom v4 with Siyah 2.6.5. I have around 8 gameloft HD games & EA games like NFS Hot Pursuit and Shadowgun etc.. No problem with 2.6.5. Everything works perfect.

I'm not using any additional scripts or mods
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] canadianrider:
yes.. and that goes for any i9100 rom... i9100m is a i9100 with a fancy "m" tagged on the end for (im assuming) identification reasons.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] greatmagician:
voodoo control

hello .... I'm on kernel 2.6.5 i try the voodoo control plus but it's not working

i got error

Module need to be loaded Device or Kernel version not supported

i know this module is auto loaded

i try to load the mc1n2_voodoo.ko using insmod >>

file exists

where is the wrong :confused:
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] ajvulcan:
Voodoo control plus IS NOT compatible with sgs2.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] greatmagician:
so how the mc1n2_voodoo.ko will work ????

only for voodoo louder ??
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] supercurio:
Little mix-up between LOUDER and Voodoo Control Plus on your side ;)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] greatmagician:
hello bro u know what we need solution for the country not support purchases market :(:(:(
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] ewok666:
Sorry, I must have missed something: what's with the changed charge limit in 2.6.5?

Thanks
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] supercurio:
Yes indeed thats why I started this project: Alternative and independent in-app billing system for Android apps

PS: which country?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] HellRazorGod:
Help supercurio

Hey supercurio,

You're the man with the expertise. Could you answer my question as to why white grain lines are appearing on the right side of the screen on darker backgrounds. It fully covers the right side of the screen and appears only in siyah's kernel. Your screen tuning app isn't helping as well. Refer 2 pages back for screenshots.

Could you figure out the reason why this is happening only with siyah? All videos appear disbanded and discoloured coz of these lines.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
that is because I lowered the lowest brightness level and the values I used for making the brightness lower are not samsung's official values.

if you try droidphile's advice again it will solve your problem.

if it doesn't then you are making something wrong. because using min_gamma=1 should prevent that lowest level to be used.

you can also try another display mode (movie or standard instead of dynamic)

this is the only solution. supercurio or anybody else will not be able to give you another solution for this problem.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] rodries:
Have you read my post?

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=21051437&postcount=15833

The solution for your script and another fix is there.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] veyka:
All good with my normal UV/uc here on 2.6.5 without thunderbolt.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] HellRazorGod:
Tried droidphile' and your advice. I simply modified the values as you guys suggested in the bolt_siyah script to 30 for min_bl, 1 for min_gamma and 24 for max_gamma. I'm pretty sure I'm not messing up on any script formatting as I'm simply modifying the values. I've even removed thunderbolt. Damn these white lines just won't go. I've attached a screenshot of the script