[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] AMDPOWERFIST:
Test results so far:

Testing is done in the same location each day a new kernel is released. Proceedure is as follows:

COPY NEW KERNEL ZIP TO SDCARD > BOOT TO RECOVERY > WIPE CACHE / DAVLIK > REBOOT RECOVERY > INSTALL NEW KERNEL ZIP > REBOOT RECOVERY > WIPE CACHE / DAVLIK > REBOOT

Battery Monitor Widget app info located here:-

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=19416214&postcount=4418

Conditions: 30minutes rest after restart / widget drain record value

SpeedMod Kernel (stock):-

K2-18-test3	=	104mA drain

K2-18-test5	=	87mA drain

K2-18-test6	=	43mA drain

K2-18-test7	=	44mA drain

K2-18-test8	=	41mA drain

K2-18-test9	=	40mA drain

K2-18-test11	=	34mA drain

K2-18-test12	=	27mA drain

K2-18-test13	=	40mA drain

K2-18-test16	=	48mA drain

K2-18-test17	=	40mA drain

K2-18-stable	=	42mA drain

K2-19-test1	=	21mA drain

Siyah Kernel (stock):-

Siyah v2.6.6	=	40mA drain

Siyah v2.6.6i	=	31mA drain

Quadrant Scoring? :-

Conditions: Fully charged / reboot / record 3rd attempt

*note* - Quadrant scores are NOT a measure of real life speed, they are behind the scenes speed and scores should only be used as a guideline for serious issues rather than how the unit functions. E.g. a score difference of 1000 – 1500+ can show some serious faults or flaws in ROM / Kernel Combinations or hardware faults.

SpeedMod Kernel (stock):-

K2-18-test3	=	4307 score

K2-18-test5	=	4723 score

K2-18-test6	=	4652 score

K2-18-test7	=	4102 score

K2-18-test8	=	4825 score

K2-18-test9	=	4607 score

K2-18-test11	=	4118 score

K2-18-test12	=	4483 score

K2-18-test13	=	4697 score

K2-18-test16	=	4423 score

K2-18-test17	=	4219 score

K2-18-stable	=	4433 score

K2-19-test1	=	4391 score

Siyah Kernel (stock):-

Siyah v2.6.6	=	4163 score

Siyah v2.6.6i	=	4302 score

Kernel Wakelocks:-

Conditions: 1hour after reboot / fully charged / screen off

SpeedMod Kernel (stock):-

K2-18-test3	=	10 types of Kernel Wakelocks

K2-18-test5	=	11 types of Kernel Wakelocks

K2-18-test6	=	8 types of Kernel Wakelocks

K2-18-test7	=	8 types of Kernel Wakelocks

K2-18-test8	=	5 types of Kernel Wakelocks

K2-18-test9	=	11 types of Kernel Wakelocks

K2-18-test11	=	12 types of Kernel Wakelocks

K2-18-test12	=	8 types of Kernel Wakelocks

K2-18-test13	=	11 types of Kernel Wakelocks

K2-18-test16	=	8 types of Kernel Wakelocks

K2-18-test17	=	11 types of Kernel Wakelocks

K2-18-stable	=	8 types of Kernel Wakelocks

K2-19-test1	=	8 types of Kernel Wakelocks

Siyah Kernel (stock):-

Siyah v2.6.6	=	9 types of Kernel Wakelocks

Siyah v2.6.6i	=	9 types of Kernel Wakelocks

CPUSpy 1hr % recording:-

(New Recording – started from transition between test 8 to test 9)

Conditions: 1hour after reboot / fully charged / screen off – record values of deep sleep / 200mhz %’ages

SpeedMod Kernel (stock):-

K2-18-test8	=	Deep sleep 92% / 200mhz 3%

K2-18-test9	=	Deep sleep 91% / 200mhz 6%

K2-18-test11	=	Deep sleep 91% / 200mhz 7%

K2-18-test12	=	Deep sleep 93% / 200mhz 3%

K2-18-test13	=	Deep sleep 90% / 200mhz 5%

K2-18-test16	=	Deep Sleep 91% / 200mhz 4%

K2-18-testt17	=	Deep Sleep 91% / 200mhz 4%

K2-18-stable	=	Deep Sleep 90% / 200mhz 4%

K2-19-test1	=	Deep Sleep 94% / 200mhz 4%

Siyah Kernel (stock):-

Siyah v2.6.6	=	Deep Sleep 96% / 200mhz 2%

Siyah v2.6.6i	=	Deep Sleep 96% / 200mhz 1%

These are however only tests done by my individual unit, every unit is different. Tests WILL vary from person to person / phone to phone.

Personal note:- I have been on SpeedMod kernel now for a few months, and decided to swap over to Siyah to see how it compares battery/performance wise. And it seems, that the battery is actually BETTER on Siyah than SpeedMod. Performance is also slightly better on Siyah than SpeedMod Kernel, measured through Go Launcher app draw being 100% fine in Siyah whereas it lags a great deal in SpeedMod Kernel, always has for some reason. Just thought i would share my recent benchmarks on this thread, so people could see how both compare. I will be staying with Siyah for a while now i think