yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] sasho36:
Not so far, and yes, they also occurred with ondemand and ondemandx.

Edit: tonight, I'll do a full wipe before upgrading to Revolution 2.7, I'll see if it's better...
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] AndreiLux:
Dude you don't even know what the latest sources are or that this kernel is using them.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] ram3n:
Please stop spamming here !

We love SiyahKernel, just because it is the best on xda.

no rage :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] ebliss:
unfortunately, yes. and I don't mind running a slower, more battery consuming version to debug. on 1.7.4 now.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Остап:
First kernel that MY device works great with 800@100MHz and smartass2 is 1.7.2. !
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] idealforyou:
Your Kernel breaks all Security Apps with Password security. See App Protector etc. I ám return too Ninphitamine. This Kernel is at time not safe.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] beaver2233:
Mm the only kernel that doesnt break it is ninphetamine...speedmod etc all break it which is annoying (GoSMS i like to use the pattern unlock to open the app but these kernels all seem to bypass the security)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
there are several logging and debugging options that I have disabled and I really could not figure out which one is required. during the first days of development (about 10 days ago, I guess) I asked for help about it and asked if those security applications still work or not, but nobody responded.

if you can tell me what is broken, I can try to pinpoint the required kernel feature in the next release. I don't want to enable all the logging and debugging. I need the name of a security app which has a trial.

or, if pattern lock in gosms works will other security apps work?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] TheMatrix2000:
It's not the Kernel which is a security issue. It's these Programs Who are insecure. They depend on logging from the Kernel. Nimph Kernel Logs, but that does'n mean that his kernel is more secure.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
that is quite right indeed :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] TheMatrix2000:
Logging

Maybe a solution with this logging and debug. I don't know if it takes much time to compile a fully logging and debugging Kernel just for the developers inside this thread. Could be an advantage to develop your Kernel better, i think, when you can receive some logs :confused::confused:

I am a normal user and i don`t need any logs. When it runs its runs. :D:D

I just try not to ask silly questions so you can develop your great kernel. :D:D
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] dannyboyp:
Also in denial! But dont worry... your first steps in acknowledging your problem is your first steps to freedom :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] bLack_Q:
Finally works with Exynos Rom. Thank you dude and keep on working!

regards
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Yoyoa:
Great Kernel, i like the features in this kernel!

How can update the version of busybox, because with the app busybox installer my version is still 1.16.2, any tips for that?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] cez10:
@gokhanmoral

what is the lowest UV for the 100mhz you would recommend ? I've seen it has quite high voltage comparing to other values ?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] chadouming:
Hardcore added an option to use the logging and debugging feature, maybe you could check with him how he did.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] dica:
where is the siyah v2.2 final??? inst released yet ??
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
just released.

I will release nolog version in 5 mins (or when the compilation finish)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] CamoGeko:
Legend. :D

Communicated from a Galaxy far far away via an XDA premium quality neurotransmitter.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] melorib:
Where... :confused:
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] android_888:
1st post...
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
first post. I forgot to click on save, sorry :)

check again.

by the way, I set ondemand up_threshold to 80 again although I received a feedback from kalpik that 85 is smooth enough, just to make sure nobody complains about it.

I have also removed some leftovers from new mali drivers that I merged yesterday.

I hope this one is as fast and as battery friendly as beta6.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Muchoaliento:
OP 10 chars
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] melorib:
Thanks... :cool:
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
I've just uploaded nolog version.

printk, seclog and android logger is disabled.

but I think latest patches from codeaurora for printk code really works and I felt no difference between those two.

I am back to logging-enabled one.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] shahulvm:
Beta 6 was really a battery friendly one. Thanks Gokhan
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] age9990:
v2.2 final still can't mount /sdcard in CWM...

only me or still a known issue?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] droidphile:
Gokhan, First impressions :)

Stable as hell :) (No surprises there)

The all new ondemand settles down to lowest frequency beautifully when screen is idle and on. Was wondering why lower scores on linpack single/multi thread runs. Found out you increased sampling rate to 120,000. Changed it back to 100,000 and linpack is happy. Settling down still good.

Lulzactive reminds me of the good old beta 9. No lag in app drawer/browser.

Great job, once again Gokhan! After being bed ridden, if this is what you do, then you're great.

One question though.

Value 3 for enable_mask is to enable AFTR. What're the other possible values and their meanings, if any?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] melorib:
v2.2 nolog working fine, thanks... :D
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] sahidmiah:
I got quadrant score of 5890 on v2.1.1 -I got quadrant score of 4795 on v2.2.so less why?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] iamsmallpang:
Hi gokhanmoral,

v2.2 .....stable...ondemand

your kernel made me don't give up my GS2

Thanks
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] hiepgia:
Because remove trick Quadrant on 2.2. :confused:
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] iamsmallpang:
i don't believe Benckmark report

if the kernel work sable , smooth in your impression

that is the best kernel for you:)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] android_888:
Why people so look Quadrant? I don't understand. Is it so important which score you reach? Is it there some difference into a phone you can feel bethween 5890 and 4795?

These results don't present nothing. Just to compete bethween each other with numbers. I prefer better battery life than numbers in Quadrant..
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] droidphile:
If anyone want the 'old high' scores back in quadrant, you can re-enable the cheat that is disabled for all/most of 2.2 betas, rcs and the final.

To do so, navigate to /sbin/siyah and open tweaks.sh

Towards the end of the file, copy all the commented lines starting after the line "#to show why quadrant score..." and paste it in your inti.d script.

(from #mkdir /tmp/q to cp -a /tmp/q...). Remove all the comments. Reboot. Run quadrant. You will get higher scores now.

This is only to make quadraholic people happy. Quadrant scores doesn't make any sense
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tolis626:
I won't bother with bull**** such as "OH MEIN GODZ!2.2 is super smooth! :eek: ",you already know it Gokhan. ;)

I'll just add two things:

1)The moment my phone booted after flashing 2.2 final and rc3 for that matter,I experienced some terrible jerkiness,even with my battery raping overclocks.In the case of rc3,I went back to rc2.But with final I wanted to know what was causing it.It stopped the moment I unplugged my phone from the charger.Go figure... :p

2)Has anyone tried pikachu01's Thunderbolt scripts?I'm thinking of trying them out,but do not know what good they'll be for the GS2.I would have already tried but free time has been less than scarce these days. :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] droidphile:
Hello trollis, err...tolis :D

I think it's worth a try. You may have to remove the lines for ondemand tweaks, if you don't prefer ondemand being less battery friendly. Zipalign scripts and sqlite db defrag scripts should be worthy. Script has a tweaked deadline scheduler too, among many other things, afaik.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] scorpion667:
Please share the init.d script line you used for this
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tolis626:
:eek:

I really hope you don't actually mean it... :confused:

Ok then,I'll give it a shot,probably tomorrow.

PS:There seems to be something wrong with performance governor.If I switch to it from ondemand,it locks the frequency at 800MHz.Nothing important,just pointing it out. :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] droidphile:
just add this line to your script (provided your active governor is ondemand)

echo "100000" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/ondemand/samping_rate

Also, if you want ondemand to be a little less responsive with slightly better battery, change threshold to 85. (2.2. default is 80)

echo "85" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/ondemand/up_threshold

Just kidding. As to performance gov, try setting min and max to same freq and set to performance.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tolis626:
Phew...For a moment I thought "Woah,when did HE turn into a prick?" :p

Anyway,I already did that and no joy,still it sticks to 800Mhz while I'm running Antutu.

As for what you posted for the other guy,I think it's the other way around.Think about it. ;)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] FrenchSparda:
OMG !! 2.2 is so smooth ^^ what a surprise :D..and what a great work. I tried many of your betas before...trying diferent settings/governor...but on my phone..stuttering were always there.

But now with 2.2...phone is so smooth and quick. Merci ;)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] droidphile:
?? :confused:

Sampling rate to hundred thousand micro seconds or 0.1 second and scale up threshold to 85. What's wrong in it?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] sahidmiah:
My I didn't understand. Can u say it plain English. I thought the higher score the raster it is. I/O I SCORE IS VERY LOW
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] FrenchSparda:
I dont understand why peoples are so obsessed with benchmark...maybe they all have little c... :p
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] kalpik:
If you're comparing the IO score to void kernel, don't. That kernel has sync disabled on the filesystem, which is very dangerous (and disabling it only helps quadrant scores). Think of it as driving without a seatbelt: everything's alright until you crash ;)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
I'm happy that v2.2 gives good performance.

the beta phase is important for me because I try different compilers, parameters, patches etc...

then I put the feedbacks together and try to mix the good parts together.

so, please do not give up trying betas :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] droidphile:
And knzo talks about quadrant cheats as if it's the dirtiest thing to do ever in a kernel!
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] bu2askoor:
Guys I was using v2.1 smartassv2 and now 2.2 huge difference. No lag for me

Great job and thank you.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tolis626:
The lower the sampling rate and up threshold are,the more responsive and less battery friendly it will be.An up threshold of 85 is NOT more responsive than 80,but it is more battery friendly.Differences seems to be negligible though...

Anyway,the problem with performance gov seems to be with Antutu benchmark.Everything else is fine.So **** Antutu. :p

Something else surfaced now.I use to overclock my GPU too,but when using ondemand,it's like the GPU is running at 267MHz instead of 400MHz,no matter what I set it to,even 400/400Mhz,which means scores in Nenamark2 are in the 40-45 range insted of 56-57 I usually get.With performance it's ok.

I hope it's just my phone that has these problems,else a lot of noobery will come here and complain... :p
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] bala_gamer:
Performance governor is stuck at 800 mhz eventhough the max clock i set is 1.4 ghz..

Is it reporting the wrong frequency or is it really stuck?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Jodelaplaya:
Sorry for the noobie question (too much post here..) but what are the difference between normal and no-lig version ? Thanks :)

Edit :with the no log version there is no log lol but what it means ?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] frankcilo:
I do not understand what has changed with the 2.2rc3 and 2.2 final: in practice the folder "conservative" still does not appear in sys \ devices ...:confused:

even if I set "ondemand" governor, not appears to me the folder "ondemand"

How I can solve this problem?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] droidphile:
Oops! Did i say setting 85 is more responsive? Less responsive is what i meant. Was brain ****ed when i typed that i guess. As to sampling rate, one user asked me how to set it to .1 second instead of .12, the default.

You have to check this folder /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq

Use root explorer.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tolis626:
It means that you have logging stuff removed.This version is *supposed* to be lighter,but bleh,it's the same.For the guy who needs logging though,it means you can't use logcat,dmsg,app protectors etc if I ain't wrong. :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Jodelaplaya:
Thanks, for a "normal" user which one is the best ?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] pepemosca:
I cannot find the efs backup of the 2.2.

Can someone explain me where is backup?

How can I start the backup process?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] incubus_fr:
I experience this after sleep mode and wakeup.

According to Antutu it is stuck to 800mhz.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] bala_gamer:
Not only antutu , but most of the apps reporting 800 mhz.

Edit:

It seems a restart solves the issue.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tolis626:
Practically,they should be the same for the guy who:

i)Isn't mad with making everything too light

ii)Doesn't need logging

If you don't fall into one of these categories,it's the same for you.Choose the one whose name you like more. :p
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Jodelaplaya:
Haha. Thanks :) gonna choose the no log :P
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] CamoGeko:
You can also use nitrality app from thw market to backup your efs. ;)

Communicated from a Galaxy far far away via an XDA premium quality neurotransmitter.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
are you sure you are looking at the right directory?

/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq

I removed other old sys directories.

I've just set the governor to conservative and I see the dir in that location.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] sierrafox:
thanks! 2.2 has got great performance, but i just realised that it stutters on HD video playback (720p/1080p) using stock video player (no OC/UV, governer/scheduler independent). the last beta which didn't stutter was 2.2b15. has anything changed significantly (dvfs locking Hz?)

many thanks again :)

ps: also noticed i updated voltage control by xan with bus Hz (i haven't changed it) will retry 2.2 with voltage control disabled and report back.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] frankcilo:
ah ... now I've found it! I did not know you had changed the directory path of "Conservative".

Thanks !!!!!!;)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] qwerty warrior:
whats new with 2.2 ?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
and yet he claims that I catch up with him :P http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=19689981&postcount=395

oh well... I believe in advertisement but this is way more than that :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] beston94:
You worry about the battery ?? you'll miss out on actually using this beautiful phone..... What would Jesus do?!
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] kidau:
I think I saw somewhere in earlier versions of the kernel that there might be video problem for some people when using sio scheduler, try cfq?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Noed:
Thanks!

Got both just in case :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] scorpion667:
Can someone confirm this?

I'm extremely happy with B15 flawlessly smooth and pulling about 5 hours screen time (30 hours total on battery), although I have adjusted my init.d script for 2.2 Final if the reviews continue to be good.

I'm obsessed with b15 I've never been happier with my phone... this thing flows through homescreens like water. After setting Sched MC to 1, upping BUS to 400 mhz for all steps beside 200mhz it's a beast, I wanna run folding @ home on this LOL
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] CamoGeko:
Changelog - http://www.gokhanmoral.com ;)

Communicated from a Galaxy far far away via an XDA premium quality neurotransmitter.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] qwerty warrior:
guys there are many Init.d Scripts

i looking to save battery

+

i heard about that u can disable the 2nd core with siyah

any help ?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
I will try to see if anything related changed since 2.2b15

this kind of feedback is very important for me (was working in Xrelease but it is not working in the others)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Alson McLaren:
I got boot loops every time after flashing v2.2!!!!

sorry but so disappointed...

is there any reason for that??

should i wipe something??
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] CamoGeko:
You can save battery by undervolting the cpu and gpu. Also to turn off 2nd core you can download tegrak's 2core app from the market.

Communicated from a Galaxy far far away via an XDA premium quality neurotransmitter.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] CamoGeko:
How did you flash it?

Communicated from a Galaxy far far away via an XDA premium quality neurotransmitter.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Alson McLaren:
Using Recovery..

btw.. my rom is Sensation 1.9..
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] CamoGeko:
Wipe cache and dalvik before flashing?

Communicated from a Galaxy far far away via an XDA premium quality neurotransmitter.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Alson McLaren:
Nope..

should i??

sorry but i thought it will do it by itself like b4..
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] scorpion667:
using odin to flash .tar's has never failed on me in 6 months of compulsive flashing, I much prefer this method.

Flasing .zip's with CWM is safe too, but it DOES fail rarely (happened to me twice in 6 months).

Maybe you got unlucky.

Try flashing the .tar version from download mode VIA Odin 1.85. If that doesn't work try flashing CF-Root, if that fails also you will have to do a nandroid backup, if that fails also re flash the ROM and install siyah right after.

Sensation 1.9 is cute and all but it rapes your battery life acording to 45% of the posts in that thread. I would switch to another ROM of I were you.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] CamoGeko:
Yes you should, especially if you're getting bootloops. ;)

Remember after doing that, booting will take some time because cache has to be rebuilt.

I flashed 2.2 nolog about 15 mins ago, and no issues here.

Communicated from a Galaxy far far away via an XDA premium quality neurotransmitter.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] robertolm:
Great job....

I used the 2.2b15 and works very smooth.... on tunein radio (radio over internet) are the best....

I will test the finall....

What is the best setting or profile to setcpu???

One thing:

Automount NTFS : ..??????

do you have a script to gscript lite??? or where the rom had to have the files to automount????

Do you has any examples of this???

Thank you.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
any feedback on log vs nolog kernels' performance?

I felt no difference at all..
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] AndreiLux:
Did you mean "now" instead of "not" ? :confused:
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Alson McLaren:
Thanks pal...:)

i know it will take sometime...

what is the different between nolog v and the other one..?

sorry for asking 2 many questions..;)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] CamoGeko:
I came from the love of beta 15 to nolog, charging now. Then will do some tests.

Communicated from a Galaxy far far away via an XDA premium quality neurotransmitter.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] scorpion667:
Please use the search function, this was answered 2 or 3 pages ago =)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] gokhanmoral:
just plug in the ntfs formatted stick and look in /mnt/usb

your rom may tell you that the filesystem is not supported but it will be mounted anyway.

since the rom will not be aware that the ntfs volume is mounted, I mount it in readonly mode to avoid any data loss.

if you want to remount it in rw mode, you can use your own script.

you can find ntfs-3g binary in /system/xbin. I copy it to /system/xbin if there is no ntfs-3g binary.

I didn't put it to /sbin because it is huge and I decompress&copy if it is not present in your system partition.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tvhak:
i have the problem with stuttering video to.

my daughter of 5 just said to me stop messing with the phone.

the videos are stuttering

hahaha lol is there a way to get them smooth again?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] CamoGeko:
Don't mind about the questions, click thanks under the helpful posts when you can. ;)

Difference is the logging tools are disabled, which in turn can improve charging time and battery life.

Communicated from a Galaxy far far away via an XDA premium quality neurotransmitter.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] jetpackjeff:
Nice work! 2.2 is solid stable here on cm7 #114. CM7 auto-brightness kind of sucks though.. could be be the lower screen brightness level causing this?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Alson McLaren:
Guys, just got another boot loop!!!!

even after wiping cache/dalvik cache!!!

anyone got this problem 2??

should I flash the nolog version??

back 2 v2.1.1...:(
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Evollution:
so no log version will be better for battery life?...
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] scorpion667:
Fix it like so:

Enable Auto Brightness in Settings -> Display

then go to:

Settings -> Cyanogenmod settings - > Display:

Disable the first checkmark which will disable all the Light sensor filter options.

Checkmark use Custom but leave those settings stock

Checkmark allow light decrease and enjoy.

You can also modify the brightness steps under "Edit other levels" but the stock ones are fine for me.

The Siyah brightness settings with Samsung ROM is indeed better, but this way it comes close.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] sierrafox:
thank YOU lol. you're pretty chilled out which helps. if it helps any, 2.2b12 - 2.2b15 work perfect. 2.2b16 stutters only a little (sorry no quantitative measurement). i haven't tried the release candidates. 2.2/2.2nolog both skip quite a lot. i've gone back to 2.2b15 for the

@kidau: i tried switching governers but no joy ...
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] CamoGeko:
That's weird, did you already try flashing via ODIN?

Sounds to me like your ROM doesn't support the kernel, or you didin't uncheck "apply on boot" in setCPU or something....

Communicated from a Galaxy far far away via an XDA premium quality neurotransmitter.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] gh.rohit:
i am on siyah 2.2rc3......

using smartassV2....is it best governer??

can you give setting for Voltages??