yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Android Themes] egorain:
Very nice, thanks for sharing, great job!
[Android Themes] tadeas482:
Thanks, its magnificent :) ;)
[Android Themes] aminsetan:
Nice

sant from W8 Using XDA premium

Hw=W8,Sy=X8

Rom:GingerXperia V22

Kernel:naA 10

Sd:16Gb,class 10

Runing now Cpu now:721Ghz
[Android Themes] itsLYNDZ:
"our service is currently unavailable in your country" Can you upload somewhere else?
[Android Themes] badboyblue:
Excellence, thanks for sharing :p
[Android Themes] E_Tack:
Nice! Thanx man!
[Android Themes] oasis90:
Amazing!! :good:
[Android Themes] chacho90:
Thank man :)

Enviado desde mi LG-P970h usando Tapatalk 2
[Android Themes] Roberto1000:
Thx for Share :good:
[Android Themes] recepo1:
Nice crisp.colorful.wallpapers thanks
[Android Themes] mrgian:
I cannot open the downloaded .rar. why?

Sent from my Optimus 2X
[Android Themes] epistle:
there is no problem with file. Did you download completely?
[Android Themes] mrgian:
Yes i did.

Sent from my Optimus 2X
[Android Themes] epistle:
i do not know bro file is working
[Android Themes] CwbAnDroidCwB:
Same issue....
[Android Themes] epistle:
did u have problem with file?
[Android Themes] Amphibliam:
Clicked on the image and got a little more than I was expecting. 0____o
[Android Themes] ilnanny:
Thanks :thumbup:

Inviato dal mio Nexus S i9023 Italia
[Android Themes] epistle:
you aare wellcome bro
[Desire Themes and Apps] fusk:
Hi

I am using 2.3.4 through Gingerbread V3

Wondering if you can install a different dialer, maybe there is a thread somewhere with dialers.

Why?

Because this one does not search my contacts for the letters entered on the dialer, very annoying.

Thanks for any help, tried asking in q&a, but no help, so giving it a try here, just in case.
[Desire Themes and Apps] Sinbad_NI:
I had the GO dialer as it was the only one I could see that had a landscape mode, seemed to work we'll, although not sure how deep it's search was.
[Desire Themes and Apps] fusk:
The problem with GO dialer is that it does not support æ ø & å, there is no support for my langauge.

I'm wondering, how come this feature has been removed in the newer versions of android.

As i see Gingerbread V3, it's just a stock android 2.3.4 with tweaks and stuff.
[Desire Themes and Apps] mr_clean5953:
Touchpal dialer is the best.
[Desire Themes and Apps] JackCarv3r:
I tried touchpal dialer and Dialer One... Touchpal is the best for me ;)
[Desire Themes and Apps] Gusta_HR:
aTakephone dialer, from very start... i tried lots of roms but allways using this dialer app.
[Desire Themes and Apps] fusk:
Touchpal looks nice, but does not come in Danish.

on the + side, it does support æ ø & å.
[Desire Themes and Apps] sas_sas:
pls tell me if it has video call feature and button ?
[Desire Themes and Apps] FixedTheFernBack:
ex Dialer is another option, based on the MIUI dialer. I haven't used it because i use MIUI already, but i've heard good things
[Captivate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] s.7:
I was running 2.1 and downloaded ryanza oclf back when it was free and set it up. backed up all the data and upgraded to 2.2. oclf didn't make a difference so i uninstalled and did a factory reset. when the phone came back up it kept popping up a force close issue with the launcher. I force close it and it goes back to normal. I've tried all the reset methods from the settings menu, to the button combination, to the volume up+down and power button, odin, and even the kies official 2.2 update and still keep having this problem. Plus my internal space is 13g and external is 1.6g but if i try to download and app that is bigger than 20mb it says insufficient space. anyone have any ideas on what is wrong and how to fix it?
[Captivate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Squeaner:
20MB files from the Market are an issue for our phones at the moment. There is no current fix for it. The partition that the downloads are originally stored temporary is only 20MB, so it fails to fit and install properly.
[Captivate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] foxbat121:
You can either install the original oclf back and use that to preform the task of removing the lag fix (which convert the app storage space back to RFS) or flash a new firmware with re-partitioning checked. Simply uninstall the OCLF will not revert the lag fix effect. That's the biggest mistake most ppl make.
[Captivate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] s.7:
oclf is no longer free and i don't want to just buy to remove the lag fix. Plus I'm pretty sure that i had tried to remove it when i realized it didn't work.
[Captivate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] foxbat121:
Then you have no choice but to flash a new ROM with re-parition checked to format the storage.
[Captivate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] s.7:
I was able to use odin one click, the one with the 2.1 eclair version on it to flash back to original and this fixed the twlauncher force close issue. then used the official kies 2.2 update and everything still works minus the stupid android error.
[Windows Phone 7 General] Tone_:
Wonder if there is any truth in this..

BadaBing.
[Windows Phone 7 General] Cotulla:
we all will die 21 December 2012, u forgot?

so they want to cancel it before, so inside hell they got some small bonus for that.

It's the final countdown...
[Windows Phone 7 General] colossus_r:
And YES.....We all die on Dec 2012 !!!!!! lol....
[Windows Phone 7 General] vetvito:
Siiiiick. Who's next
[Windows Phone 7 General] VonCrisp:
Sounds to me that someone from SamFirmware got butt hurt because of this thread yesterday and decided to post about the demise of WPx.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1251414&page=8

.. In short.. Samfirmware was trying to up the downloads of their firmwares before they would release the RTM mango for Omnia7. Turned into a flame war.

If Samsung has not made a clear roadmap for WPx, it does not mean that they are killing it. This is pure speculation on SamFirmwares part.
[Windows Phone 7 General] vangrieg:
Samsung is a very opportunistic company, so anyone who's trying to guess what they will decide in the end of 2012 is dreaming.

That Samsung has no commitment for WP7 now is sort of obvious by their lineup (or lack thereof).
[Windows Phone 7 General] Alcoholic:
This would make no sense since WP is destined to be the number 2 operating system in a few years according to multiple analysts. I can see Moto not jumping now that they are owned by google but not Samsung. Samsung , HTC ,and Nokia are going to be the 3 major players in the market. But who knows what the legal teams talk about. Maybe Microsoft pissed Samsung off asking a piece of their android sales like with HTC ( $15 per android device )
[Windows Phone 7 General] MartyLK:
That's why the space station exists, to give the big-wigs a place to watch humanity be destroyed...for entertainment.
[Windows Phone 7 General] N8ter:
Well if they doit will not be suprising. Samsung has their own platform and ecosystem which seems to be taking off decently in the grand scheme of things. Plus, they simply don't have the freedom they need to innovate on WP7.
[Windows Phone 7 General] WhyBe:
All Microsoft needs now is Nokia. The other's have not shown a legitimate commitment to WPhone. All the WP phone specs and design are lackluster compared to other brands. I think it's to MS advantage to focus on one hardware manufacturer that can create hardware that is totally synergistic with the Mango OS...the same way Apple does with their devices. In the Android market, there is a forgetable phone released every week it seems like. MS needs to focus on one or two very memorable phones to gain mindshare. A high-end phone (more expensive than iPhone or top-end Android), and a mid-range phone.
[Windows Phone 7 General] vangrieg:
I wouldn't worry about Samsung's frustration in this area. :-)
[Windows Phone 7 General] sh4d0w86:
i don't actually mind them backing out... their WP7 and coming known offerings aren't very worthy of consumer money, imho. though, i must admit, them backing out could harm the rest of us with increased pricing. : /

also, i do like the idea (proposed?) at the end of that article. Microsoft should pick up RIM, Blackberry enhancements would do great things for WP7, i imagine.

just my two cents...

sh4d0w86.
[Windows Phone 7 General] aquanaut88:
samsung's loss if true. bada is going nowhere outside of korea and low-end smart phones (think palm). they now compete head-to-head with htc, but with their vertical hardware component production (e.g., amoled) they have an advantage as long as that remains a leading technology. and have attracted the attention of competitors like apple... but for their hardware+android creations... not a dead-end bada 'ecosystem'.

cheers
[Windows Phone 7 General] lumpaywk:
tbh who cares? one word Nokia
[Windows Phone 7 General] Freypal:
I have an Omnia 7 now. Whilst the hardware is great, I doubt i'd get another Samsung phone with all the software issues there have been.

I don't expect to have to be putting resistors into my USB port to get into download mode for instance and Samsungs lack of any really decent apps in the market speak volumes.

My contract is up around March time. The thing that sold me on the Omnia was the AMOLED screen and since Nokia seem to be using them it's a bit of a no brainer for me.
[Windows Phone 7 General] george232:
The only thing I'd miss would be AMOLEDs, but if Nokia keeps using them (but Clear Black is just a filter, it isn't necessarily AMOLED...), I'm fine. No way I'm going back to LCD.
[Windows Phone 7 General] N8ter:
Super AMOLED+ is so superior to AMOLED, it's kind of insulting and ignorant to compare the AMOLED panels on the DVP or a Nokia phone to the Samsung panels.

Seriously, Samsung's displays are in a league above practically everyone else in all areas except pixel density these days. And I expect to see some qHD mobile displays coming from them soon.

Samsung phones tend to have a number of advantages in hardware:

1. They tend to use NAND Flash instead of SD Cards internally like Dell and HTC (offers better performance)

2. Their Camers are always at least "Good"

3. Their Cell Radios tend to be wildly superior to anything that isn't Motorola

4. Their sound tends to be wildly superior to anything that isn't an iPhone or dedicated media device (Zune or iPod)

5. Their displays are superior to anything else on the market outside of pixel deisity vs some qHD/LG (iPhone) displays

6. Their higih end smartphones always have at least a decent battery size, and aren't weighty

The thing they always miff up, though, is the software. Microsoft was supposed to negate that weakness of thiers, but I guess Samsung always has to find a way to fail ya know :P

I don't expect a phone OEM to provide flawless software, though. I just want a good phone. Let Microsoft worry about the software. Dunno how they miffed up WP7, but I guess they were trying hard. I think some of the issues were a the wrong ROM being loaded on the phones (focus?) or something...

Samsung is the only OEM outside of Dell that actually put some thought into their flagship WP7 devices (Focus and DVP), so they do deserve a bit of credit.
[Windows Phone 7 General] ohgood:
samsung has the sales numbers in hand (their own information), which most likely m$ wants kept quiet. As a globally present company, they don't care what os is run, so long as the phones sell. They have no alligience to a software platform, only to sales. Nothing would surprise me at this point with the very slow uptake of wpx.

Then again, this thread speculates about things that might happen in 2012-13, which means nothing. The holiday season of 2011 is where the golds at.
[Windows Phone 7 General] vetvito:
Bada is going nowhere? Millions upon millions sold and its going nowhere?

If Bada is dead end and going nowhere, why is it outselling WP7?
[Windows Phone 7 General] JamesAllen:
A loss but how big?

Look, I have had the Focus since last December and love it. Sure, it has had some frustrating and random issues but I am a very old guy and grew up with the earliest computers so am accustomed to dealing with these. I bought the Focus mainly for the screen, my eyes aren't what they used to be. I have had all HTC phones prior to the Focus and tweaked, flashed and updated until I grew weary of it, but liked the hardware. I will just go to Nokia or HTC but will not move away from WP7. There will be phones with screens equal to Super AMOLED or better, I have little doubt of that. The support (or lack of it) from Samsung for the phone and software has been terrible so goodbye to a poor company from that standpoint.
[Windows Phone 7 General] N8ter:
Yea, I didn't even see fit to care about that post, Lol.

And Samsung has an Allegience. It's called Bada. And when they feel it's ready I'm sure they will do what they have to do to convert as many of their users to it as possible.

The world does exist outside of a few major 1st world nations, you know... And there are more people out there... Many more.

Personally I cannot wait for them to release ChatOn so that I can drop WhatsApp, etc.
[Windows Phone 7 General] vangrieg:
Bada schmada... Samsung will make whatever sells, they've never made any long-term commitments to anyone except for themselves. They've played with Symbian and WM, now it's Android and a little bit of WP, they also extended their dumbphone platform to a smartphone (kinda) status to have their own cheap Android lookalike, they'll do these things for as long as they're Samsung.

They also make strong public statements during negotiations and they've always done it. They are negotiating now with Microsoft and Google, so sure they need a Bada bargaining chip. Which at one point may become something great, who knows. They have a long way to go though. Because what many people fail to realize when looking at Bada sales from carrier-controlled markets is that where Bada does sell it's dirt cheap. Nada phones here cost 150-350 bucks, that's half the price of a smartphone actually, and the cheapest SAMOLED option available. So while Samsung does save 15-20 bucks on licensing and royalties Bada isn't awfully profitable. And they made tons of handsets that don't sell through all too well, I see them on every corner. Samsung needs to take up Nokia's shelf space, and they are doing it with all they can gather.
[Windows Phone 7 General] normz.muufin:
Good point. Things are much different here than they are there.

I have not even seen a Bada phone before. Is it actually considered a 'smartphone os'?
[Windows Phone 7 General] vangrieg:
Well, it's certainly a smartphone OS in that it has "apps" and does email, browsing and stuff. So if you've heard on TV that smartphones are the thing these days and go shopping without actually knowing why you need one, a Samsung Wave is a steal - it costs like a dumbphone but has SAMOLED (which, you've heard, is cool).

Things are really different when phones aren't subsidized. For reference, Mozart costs $430 here, and it's the cheapest WP7 device announced. 16GB iPhone 4 is $800-900, Galaxy S2 is $600-700.
[Windows Phone 7 General] N8ter:
Yes, Bada is a smartphone OS. It runs TouchWiz and has Social Hubs and everything. It can integrate with more services than practically any other smartphone, including IM services and Email/Calandar/Contacts from several dispirate services like Windows Live, Gmail, Exchance, Yahoo!, etc.

It has an HTML5 browser that supports HTML5 video. It has Adobe Flash. Supports PUSH, Widgets, yada yada.

It's definitely a smartphone OS, that's for sure.
[Windows Phone 7 General] vangrieg:
Actually, in terms of raw functionality, Bada may be even superior to other OSes. It supports all media formats you can think of (including mkv and flac), it has built-in offline navigation, it has, as N8ter mentioned built-in Facebook and Twitter support and so on. It has some "real" multitasking.

As such, it is very much like Symbian, and is aimed primarily at feature phone audience who don't want to bother with setting up accounts, exposing credit cards, looking for apps, and basically expect a lot of functionality from a phone at a cheap price.

The problems with Bada are also similar to those of Symbian, however. It's rather buggy, background apps may slow it down to a crawl, the app selection is rather poor, the Twitter client only pulls like five tweets at a time, the UI is, (while being an iPhone and partly Android ripoff) inconsistent and sometimes confusing, and cheaper Android phones are getting closer and closer to it in terms of price. Bada 2.0 brings some UI overhaul, but it's still not there. You just can't help seeing that it's cheap stuff. It's aimed at a relatively large market, but it's shrinking nevertheless, especially with components getting cheaper and cheaper. Basically, just like with Nokia's Symbian right now, Bada is a hedging bet intended for keeping their core audience until smartphones become more affordable. It doesn't make much sense in subsidized markets because the price difference for the end user is negligible there.

That said, theoretically Samsung could improve it. Will it? I'm not sure, Samsung isn't exactly known for its software capabilities. Just like Nokia. And I think it's just too expensive for a single OEM unless they set up a real software division. One shouldn't forget that perfecting things is difficult and costly. It's one thing to take an OS used for dumbphones and attach some sort of API/SDK stuff to it and declare a smartphone, and another thing to make it excellent. It may take 20% of resources to get 80% of the functionality, but then it'll take 80% of resources to complete the job.
[Windows Phone 7 General] N8ter:
It will be interesting to see where they go with Bada. I think refining the graphics and making it look less like its UI is composed of ASCII art (and issue Symbian had as well) would go a long way. Looks only count for so much, but they're in the gutter for aesthetics with Bada at the moment.
[Windows Phone 7 General] MikeyMike01:
Samsung is a terrible company.

However, I don't buy this rumor one bit. Just announced the Samsung Focus S and Focus Flash for this year.
[Windows Phone 7 General] vetvito:
Vangrieg, those might be real problems IF Bada wasn't selling.

Doesn't matter what it looks like, as the **** is selling. That is the ONLY thing that matters to OEMs.

Cheap to you is affordable to someone else.
[Windows Phone 7 General] vangrieg:
Sure, that's the point, Bada has a target market and it appeals to many due to its low price. It also has very good distribution and a lot of marketing support. AND, regardless of its shortcomings, it's a decent product for its price. The funny thing is I can say the same about Symbian.

But I'm not dismissing it.

What I'm saying is that in my view (and according to what Samsung says) it's a stopgap solution right now. Whether it'll become something more is an open question.

Also, sales aren't the only thing that matters to OEMs, profitability is also important. And it's easy to see that adding Android to a handset adds $50-100 to the price compared to Bada, for more or less the same hardware. Bada competes with cheaper feature phones, which dictates pricing, and it's not all that rosy (especially if you account for distributor incentives, advertising costs, promo materials, shelf space, huge stocks etc. etc.) All these costs will be a worthwhile investment if users will be willing to buy another handset with the same OS. This is not at all clear to me (or anyone, for that matter). With distribution and pricing like Bada has (in places where it is sold), you can sell donkey's ears in large quantities. But that's not the whole picture.
[Windows Phone 7 General] netghst1:
Point taken, you have to wonder how rumors like this get started initially. Until something actually appears in a press release or news conference, it is pretty irrelevant to speculate on what the mid-term market conditions will be 8 quarters from now...
[Windows Phone 7 General] geddeeee:
I think the 'rumour' was started by samfirmware.com.

Seems they got a bit stroppy after posting at XDA. They got well flamed here.

Ho hum.... Samfirmware were pretty childish!!!!

WP7 is potentially a huge market for Samsung. To discontinue any WP7 devices would be bad for business. And, as pointed out, they have new WP7 phones ready to go.
[Windows Phone 7 General] N8ter:
SamFirmware has 1000% more credibility than the people who flame in this XDA forum, tbh.

Doesn't mean I believe it, I'm just throwing it out there.
[Windows Phone 7 General] magicsquid:
Would be surprised if Samsung decided to stop making WP devices completely.

WP is on a yearly major release cycle and has relatively standardised hardware. Would seem relatively little effort for Samsung to put out a couple of Windows phones and refresh the hardware once a year.

Keeping their WP devices ticking over would also leave them well positioned if WP takes off (e.g. because of Windows 8 or Nokia etc).
[Windows Phone 7 General] N8ter:
Business isn't about effort. It's about money. What they choose to do will be based on how it affects their bottom line.

And the Yearly Server pack deal is becomming a showstopper for me.

So I'll have to wait until next November for Video MMS? Maybe they're banking on all the dumb/feature phone users upgrading to WP7 by the?
[Windows Phone 7 General] vetvito:
Just go to Google news and type Bada. Samsung is taking it very seriously. The CEO himself even stated that people are underestimating Bada.

All current handsets will receive the Bada 2.0 update. 1.4 ghz versions are due this October.

I guarantee you they will push Bada before anything else. WP7 is just a BS hobby to Samsung, just to keep MS off their ass.
[Windows Phone 7 General] kwajr:
**** Samsung. Anyway
[Windows Phone 7 General] munkeyphyst:
Nonsense, their Focus is currently the top WP7 phone, they are releasing 2nd Gen wp7 devices with the new Focus S looking to be the current best in that group (Brandon uses it), and they're making the new windows 8 tablet. They aren't going anywhere.
[Windows Phone 7 General] FTC:
...what do you expect a Samsung CEO to say about his own OS?
[Windows Phone 7 General] ohgood:
hooray

Hooray for more competition ! Competition = innovation, so that's a good thing. With iphone5, ICS, bada, wp, and whoever resurrects palmos, this is great competition ! Bring on the NEW INNOVATIONS for me to enjoy. Oh, please no patent lawsuits though, stiffling innovation is such a waste.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] chruez:
Hi together i've flashed my phone it's FW few weeks ago to KH3, and it's working awesome, I really enjoy it, so far!

Sadly, my bluetooth headset is not working.

My galaxy2 just can't see/find it.

Thus far, I updated the FW of my headset to the latest version.. But it didn't help.

There is something wrong with the FW on the phone, cause my earlier phone (galaxy 1) worked perfectly with it.

Thanks in advance for for any help in this case, else I have to wait for the next update.

rgds dani
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] diesiren:
Same Problem on My GS2 with CM7 Nightly

My headset is MW600
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] chruez:
it's so annoying, i got one step closer, but it's still not working!

tried several FW's in meantime, even all the exynos rom (by the way it's awesome, if it works ;-))

anyway in meantime I lost the hope that this issue gets solved with 2.3.5!

annoying is that my old galaxy with FW 2.3.3 got absolutely no problems with my headest!

the most depressing thing is, i can see the headset, but when i try to connect to it, it brings back the error that the password is incorrect.. (WTF!!)

(i mean something is **** anyway in this fw! if you turn on the bluetooth and off again, you can't turn it on without reboot! such stupid developers..

i would really be happy if SOE can help me out of here please!

is it possible to get the bluetooth settings from the old environment
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] chruez:
I've sent an email to the vendor let's see what happens.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] chruez:
finaly bluetooth and wlan module were broken on my mobile..