yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ayancold:
Try to flash some stable FROYO Rom first. Kryillos ROM 8.2.1 is very Good ROM to flash. And you will get the same feel of gingerbread in it unless ofcourse you want to see 2.3.4/2.3.5 on your phone try flashing CM7alpha 6 allover again. Hope this helps.

Hit Thanks if i helped you in anyway.:P
[Galaxy 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] bscraze:
Did u wipe data/factory reset at the cwm recovery?
[Flipout and Charm Themes and Apps] bagers:
Is it advisable to update to market 3.1.3 ? Or could it brick my phone?

I found it on google...

http://www.androidpolice.com/2011/08/23/download-android-market-3-1-3-

adds-1-for-apps-and-games-pin-number-for-purchases-and-more/

The market itself does not show up on my old market version 3.13.
[Flipout and Charm Themes and Apps] edwardshaw:
You cannot update the market app to 3.x because it don’t work on android 2.1
[HTC Incredible S] kaysen:
Is there a way i can optimize the ram of htc Incredible s so i can multi task more efficiently?
[HTC Incredible S] ultim:
The phone has plenty of ram, what can't u do currently?

To get the best of your phone, try installing a custom Rom.

Sent from my mobile
[HTC Incredible S] scoobysnacks:
you shouldn't be having any issues....

If you are it could be because of sense, which is kind of a resource hog.

Try a sense 2.1 rom instead of a sense 3.0 rom, or just lose sense all together.
[HTC Incredible S] jkolner:
You could try this RAM Optimization.
[HTC Incredible S] kaysen:
Thanks all for your kind advices...
[HD2 Android Themes and Apps] Marvlesz:
looks promising ..

reserved #2
[HD2 Android Themes and Apps] dimqs153:
looks good...im waiting
[HTC EVO 3D] skaffer:
Hi, my software number is 1.20.631.2 and whenever i try to find updates it says none are available, but for the rooting process it says i need some 2.+ software version. Any help would be appreciated, thanks!

also i have the gsm version of the E3D from rogers
[HTC EVO 3D] il Duce:
I think the 2.0xxxxx updates were only for the CDMA sprint evo3D. Go into the GSM development section and start reading everything, you will most likely find your answer in there :)
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] omar.abbas:
i didn't know what went wrong with my stock browser. everything was working fine and then i dont know what happened, whenever i opened my browser, everything started to force close.. i replaced the browser.apk with the original one that came with the stock firmware just in case but it didnt work either. so i flashed the same firmware i.e KH3 without a wipe but the browser problem was still there.. i replaced the browser.apk again after just freshly rooting it and then it got stuck at the first boot screen.. any idea how to get this fixed
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 General] XGrzesiuX:
Guys,

I have HTC Evo 4g and samsung galaxy tab 10.1 and i can get the two units to pair but i cant share the internet from the evo 4g on bluetooth. The only reason i want to use bluetooth is to save the battery life on the phone. Did anyone was successful and if yes how? Both units are rooted.
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 General] Bauxite:
I run the evo deck 1.3 rom and it works without issue.
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 General] .torrented:
sending internet via bluetooth?

@OP: you cant send it via bluetooth you need to enable wireless tether and tether the two devices...
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 General] Bauxite:
All I had to do was enable the Bluetooth on both, pair them and hit configure on the device from the tablet and enable tethering.

I am running tiamat kernel on the evo and the 1.4oc kernel on the tab (stock rom), both are rooted. Enabling the connection automatically turns on wireless tether in Bluetooth mode on the evo.
[G Tablet Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] etho2400:
I just got Vegan Tab 7.1 and LOVE IT... the UI is fantastic!

However, there seems to be an issue with several if not most of my apps on the Android Market. I get the message "This item is not compatible with your device"

All of these apps I have used with previous roms including Vegan tab 7.0.3 and Cyanogen Mod 7.1

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance :)
[G Tablet Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] cmart4:
clear market data, then try again.... worked for me
[G Tablet Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] etho2400:
Good Call, I should have thought of that.
[G Tablet Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] pfink42:
Clearing data is only only a temporary fix (at least for me). A few hours later Market updates and I get the "not compatible" message again.

I clear data again and later it again updates.

The other solution seems to be to freeze the market updater.
[G Tablet Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] SoNic67:
That happend to me too...

I did go back to Harmony ROM.
[G Tablet Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] praveen1789:
one of the reason;

When using the Android Market website, a device will be grayed out if it isn’t compatible with the app you’re attempting to install. Most commonly, this occurs because the app isn’t designed for your device's screen size or version of Android.

source: https://www.google.com/support/androidmarket/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=1141074

I faced this issue as I changed my LCD density. After reverting back to the default LCD density value for my mobile, It worked normal.
[G Tablet Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] cranky_dan:
I have also noticed that after the vegan 7.1 update, my device has *vanished* from the list of my devices on android market. Is anyone also noticing this?

What is the "default" density? After installing 7.1 i noticed it's now 160...

Regarding cache-clearing: I have tried that and it didn't work.

Dan
[G Tablet Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Fuzzy John:
I am on stock 3588 plus the enhancement pack.

A couple of weeks ago I started having the same problem with the compatibility of most apps. In addition when I go the Market and then to My Apps now I only see a single app listed: LauncherPro. All other apps I installed from the market are no longer on the list.

I have reset the market by clearing the data and stopping Market and the Google Framework to no avail.

My G-Tab no longer shows as a device in my account.

I believe Google did something to eliminate the unauthorized devices.
[G Tablet Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mrphil101:
I also think they have changed to block the "unauthorized" roms from working. about half the app installed now tell me they are not compatible with my device, and some of them are paid apps. I have asked this question, and the Markets response was to do a factory reset on my phone. I told them that was a crock as I have been on this rom for months now and a factory reset should be a last resort, not a standard fix. I asked them if they changed the market so that it looks at that, and no response yet. on the reply I got from the original mailing, my "specs" are included in the mail I sent them. It has android_os listed twice. the first is gingerbread, and the second is "other". And the first paragraph seems to indicate that with the "warning" about unauthorized os's. And the os is actually what should be on my device (android os), just it is modified, which happens when you personalize your phone anyway by adding widgets, change wallpaper or toggle features.
[G Tablet Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] NullUser:
So is there any hack for that?

Or at least a way to find out what exactly in my device settings prevents the app from being compatible?
[G Tablet Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] plasticarmyman:
Use the modded market..you shouldn't run into that at all with it

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1582422
[Networking] bwstonemd84:
Uh looks like the merger might not be happening after all! Wow big news. The Sprint / TMOBUS may happen if this falls through.
[Networking] NewZJ:
I am satisfied by this
[Networking] MartyLK:
Sad news indeed. :(
[Networking] pmcqueen:
wow... this is EXCELLENT news.

what's really saddening to me, though, is that I truly believed that my government would allow for this merger to occur. that says a lot about my faith in those who I've elected to represent my country. oh well, at least (for once), it looks like the gov't will be favoring the people over big business... that's refreshing.
[Networking] Ace42:
??

This is good news for us T-MO users! We don't want AT&T bringing their bad customer service over here and their shoddy rate plans and bad business. If they win, then AT&T users will benefit more, leaching from tmobile's data network. Let att expand by themselves no one wants to be forced into something they didn't pay for. ;) Plus if they join, they'll be too many Iphones clogging the data streams, slowing down the HD video calls, people rarely use.
[Networking] shogunmark:
FYI this does not make the deal completely dead yet, the FCC would still have to rule on it! So this merger still has a chance, just not a good one.

I myself am really hoping this deal goes through!
[Networking] MartyLK:
We'll both hope. :)
[Networking] Ace42:
They need to hurry it up and just cancel this already, this will leave only AT&T as the main provider for GSM phones in the US! That's not a good thing, there will be less variety for the consumer and less competition for AT&T....AT&T went down the drain as soon as it brought Cingular back in the day, I would never use them again, I rather go back to Sprint. We'll be stuck with limited data, high rates, high rates, and extremely high taxes and rates. Why can't DTE or whatever realize this isn't good for competition and the consumers?
[Networking] shogunmark:
We are certainly the minority!
[Networking] MartyLK:
AT&T never actually bought Cingular. Cingular was part of the AT&T conglomerate all along. The only thing that was done was a name change from Cingular to AT&T. If you go into the APN settings of an AT&T phone, you'll still see the Cingular name.

But Cingular did buy out Cellular One.
[Networking] pmcqueen:
...because it is blatantly anti-competitive and a deal that was struck with no intention of bettering the industry with the consumer in mind.

I guess if you like kissing big businesses' asses and fanning their executives with exotic leaves while feeding them grapes from gold-plated platters this might be the type of merger you'd support, but other than that... really? :confused:
[Networking] Ace42:
But Cingular merged and is now under AT&T, I'm sure they replaced the cingular employees during their take over, I'm sure the same will happen if T-mobile is taken too-even more people could end up w/o jobs. I'm aware if they acquire tmobile they'll expand 4G, and will create LTE stations in various areas, which is a good thing at least. But I don't like the rate plans being used by AT&T at all, to get my current plan renewed under AT&T would actually put me at a loss, and probably others that are on Prepaid/Flex-pay.
[Networking] shogunmark:
I disagree, i am a consumer and it would definitely benefit me! Especially since i dont want to go to t-mo, but i sure do want their network!
[Networking] Ace42:
The network expansion and possible job creation are the only upsides to the acquisition here, but who wants to pay an arm and a leg for their plan? I made a dummy plan to compare rates, and unlimited on AT&T is way beyond 100, compared to the ~75[exc taxes] i've been paying on tmobile. I'm sure Sprint and verizon are cheaper than that too.
[Networking] MartyLK:
Cingular didn't merge with itself. Cingular existed as an AT&T division all along. There was no change to Cingular other than the name change. Some time before the name change, Cingular did buy out Cellular One. CO was a completely different company and, no doubt, CO's employees were adjusted.
[Networking] pmcqueen:
yep, so it benefits you, the AT&T customer, and screws everyone else... including people who have nothing to do with AT&T or T-MO.

guys, it's really simple:

less competition, worse for consumers. it's not rocket science.
[Networking] :
I wouldn't mind a list of bullet points as to why you think this merger benefits the consumer...

Not you, "the consumer".

AT&T would improve it's network? They had an opportunity to do that for $3.8 mil once before and didn't jump at the chance... they didn't care about YOU enough to build up the network they're already sitting on. The writing is on the wall here and even lowly simpletons can make out exactly what would happen... Rate plans = up (for both parties customers), Network = the same with the addition of "some" LTE stations which you may or may not be able to utilize fully and customer service would diminish. If you want the merger simply to utilize Tmobiles network, then go ahead and pay your ETF and jump ship... we don't have unlimited data anymore (in anticipation for this merger, gaurunteed) and the rates have slowly risen up and customer loyalty is already starting to fall.

"We'll add 5000 domestic jobs"....

yea, it's called slapping your ATT signs on existing T-Mobile call centers... lol.

The FCC would be amazing if they get behind this block and it all falls through. At least at that point Tmobile could die a slow death and THEN at&t can pick up the pieces, assuming Sprint doesn't come up with a miracle.
[Networking] MartyLK:
But...but...they have the iPhone :D
[Networking] shogunmark:
Believe it or not, i am not the only one, sure it benefits AT&T customers, but there are also T-MO people that were looking forward to it as well. So it doesnt screw everyone else!
[Networking] Ace42:
Okay, so Cingular bought AT&T, and CO, then AT&T replaced Cingular name-wise later on?

http://news.consumerreports.org/ele...umer-reports-cell-phone-survey-att-worst.html

Look at that from last year, I've heard nothing but bad stories of the support from at&t, I don't want to experience it myself.
[Networking] shogunmark:
That seems to be how it works! SBC bought AT&T but took their name. However SBC (among others like Ameritech, etc) was the result of them breaking off from AT&T many many years ago.
[Networking] :
dude, use google.

http://money.cnn.com/2004/02/17/technology/cingular_att/

Cingular basically absorbed ATT wireless, then proceeded to rebrand itself as AT&T since AT&T had such a recognizable name across the world... not everyone recognized Cingular, and by everyone I mean foreign politicians and shareholders...

AT&T once dominated land-line service and that was the goal for wireless, which as we see now is still in full effect.
[Networking] shogunmark:
that survey was for iphone users..
[Networking] MartyLK:
No. Cingular was AT&T's wireless division from the beginning. AT&T, rather than differentiating it's wireless division, changed Cingular's name to AT&T Wireless. No employees were canned or moved or anything. No changes were made to the company system or infrastructure at all. Cingular is still the same as it always has been, except for its name.

Cellular One was a completely different company that didn't belong to AT&T at the time. AT&T bought Cellular One and merged it with its Cingular Wireless division. Then, later one, AT&T changed the name of Cingular Wireless to AT&T Wireless.
[Networking] MartyLK:
That's actually more accurate than what I stated.
[Networking] Ace42:
I did look it up :P That's why I put the events in order lol

Yeah, they'll be clogging up the Tmo data if they jump on over here :mad: . .Problem is they don't have many smartphones, since they recently picked up Android, and before that they didn't have anything that would use up a lot of data like the Iphone. Many android users with 2gb and higher plans can reach the limit.
[Networking] shogunmark:
Thats why i want the addition of the T-MO network :D it all boils down to the d@mn iphone! i wish that thing would have never hit the ATT network!
[Networking] Ace42:
One thing that still doesn't add up here, is how can AT&T force their phones to operate on Tmobile's 3G frequencies? They're different so only edge/voice would actually work...
[Networking] shogunmark:
I would imagine that this would be a gradual change, like when the former name cingular went from tdma to gsm. ah, i remember my old nokia that would do tdma and gsm, those were the days, lol
[Networking] NomNuggetNom:
Ugh. I'm personally a t-mobile user, and I want this to go through. You people talking about bad customer service? Hey, welcome to our world. People at t-mobile stores don't do ****. They're like "buy the most expensive phone and plan". It's horrible trying to negotiate anything with them. Plus, we have hardly any coverage.
[Networking] MartyLK:
There has been speculation that AT&T would make the T-Mobile high-speed data bands their LTE network...somehow. Eventually current T-Mobile phones would no longer work on the data network of T-Mobile if this is correct. But it would take a long time...maybe several years...for this to settle in.
[Networking] Ace42:
Sounds like they have a long way to go then, won't really be seeing the expanded coverage anytime soon.

Depends on your location, that can be said about any carrier. Urban areas will have the best coverage out of any place, places with less people might have less coverage.

@MartyLK Wouldn't LTE be obsolete in a few years? There should be a faster technology being developed, maybe LTE+ or Super LTE?
[Networking] MartyLK:
I would think so. But AT&T would likely use T-Mobile's existing bandwidth for whatever technology they employ
[Networking] Ace42:
Guess we'll just have to wait and see how everything plays out then, it could go either way, with AT&T losing money from US Justice or the merger going through.
[Networking] MartyLK:
Yeah. You can expect AT&T to fight like a dog over a T-Bone steak because they have 3 billion dollars riding on the merger. If the merger doesn't go through, they have to fork over 3B to T-Mobile...that's what they promised T-Mo.
[Networking] :
not to mention another 4 billion in "other stuff"
[Networking] Ace42:
I could sure you one of those billions right about now, they make it seem so small. By the time I make that much I'll be moderating the graveyard.
[Networking] rr5678:
Yeah. The ones that are actively or were previously doing crack at the time of reply.

I know damn well I don't want this to happen. $79.99/month for unlimited everything is better than Verizon's $84.99/month with tiered data with hotspot plans and data overages, Sprint's $99/mo unlimited, and A **** and Tee's $135/month for tiered data, hotspot plans and overages. DOUBLE THE PRICE for LESS DATA than I get with T-Mobile.
[Networking] Ace42:
Good to know someone else doesn't want the higher rate plans too, I pay 79 now, excluding insurance fees and taxes...I would hate to see the bill on at&t, it would be 135+taxes=150! 150*12= 1800 per year, 79.99+taxes= ~87, 87*12= 1044 per year on TMO.

The difference in the bills, is way to much, that money could be going towards something else, but instead it's for insane plans with even less features! :mad:
[Networking] rr5678:
And those $756 dollars saved could be spent on other bills :p
[Networking] shogunmark:
Even if the merger doesn't happen, do you really think the tmo plans will stay that cheap? I still have unlimited data on my line and unlimited text on all of the phones on my account (which is 4 total) and still pay less than 140 a month
[Networking] MartyLK:
Yet look what those lower prices has done to T-Mobile. They can't survive. It makes no difference if AT&T and T-Mo merge or not as to what you'll be paying down the road. If the merger doesn't happen, T-Mobile will die away and you'll need to go to another carrier for service. If you plan to stay with GSM...plan on paying those higher prices with AT&T. Either way, my crystal ball foretells AT&T in your future.
[Networking] SuicideMyk:
no matter how you look at it Deutsche Telekom is going to sell T-Mobile no matter what

Deutsche Telekom, unwilling to keep investing in the U.S. wireless industry, had been seeking ways to offload T-Mobile USA for at least two years before it settled on the sale to AT&T.

Read more: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904716604576542373831069388.html#ixzz1WfWruNNA

for all you know if the deal falls through I heard Fed-Ex is a potential buyer :D
[Networking] rr5678:
But you were grandfathered into that. You gotta think about it from a new customer's perspective, which is what most of T-Mobile will be if this merger happens.

And now, unlimited voice and text and 4GB data is $135 for one freaking phone.

And instead of selling it's assets, DT should just let T-Mobile US break away from it's parent company. Let it be it's own business. I mean, they'd be ridding themselves of all the towers and stuff anyway if the merger went through. Buuuuuut.......since AT&T is offering $39 billion, that has to be why this is happening instead.

Yep. That is also true. I wonder if they had seriously pushed the low price advertising onto the public would things have been different? And what if they had gotten the iPhone first?

And my crystal ball reads Sprint or Verizon :p I may hate CDMA, but I hate AT&T more.
[Networking] bwstonemd84:
Don't forget tmobile will still be given 3 billion dollars for the merger not going through. If at&t has 39 billion to buy tmobile then they have the money to add more towers and increase the better all experience for at users. Verizon had a plan and did well with their plan. Sprint will pick up TMOBUS and now at a cheaper price once the fcc puts an end to this merger. I just wonder it tmob would be integrated into sprint or would it be a subsidiary of Sprint?
[Networking] SuicideMyk:
just look at what Sprint did to Nextel... just saying
[Networking] rr5678:
Instead of changing their name to Sprint Nextel, they shoud have changed it to Sextel :p
[Networking] SuicideMyk:
lmao :D

.

.

.

.
[Networking] MartyLK:
AT&T may well be able to afford a great many new towers, but it matters for nothing if they don't have the bandwidth to send to those new towers. The wireless spectrum isn't available outside of the FCC providing it generally through auctions. Right now, the only way to get more bandwidth and frequencies is to acquire existing ones. Which is what AT&T is trying to do by merging with T-Mobile. If the merger goes through, AT&T gets T-Mobile's wireless spectrum...all their frequencies and bandwidth...and then can build up a larger infrastructure...put up a great many more towers and all associated systems.

The merger would make AT&T the wireless carrier for all others to envy. The service they would offer down the road would revolutionize the wireless industry. Cell service would be a reliable and happy service.
[Networking] rr5678:
It'll be pre-1984 all over again
[Networking] MartyLK:
It isn't looking good for the merger:

http://www.dailytech.com/For+ATT+Legal+Nightmare+Over+Acquisition+Has+Just+Begun/article22601.htm
[Off-topic] sakai4eva:
I guess some of you knew my little project TiBo failed. No worries mates, actually... this is how I feel right now.
[Off-topic] idavid_:
Maybe she rejected you because you're not sexy enough?

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1242089

;) :p

Swyped from my HTC Sensation
[Off-topic] sakai4eva:
I have no idea. I have no idea why because she is ignoring me all of a sudden.

Anyway, since most of contacts are not around for the holidays, I'm fsking bored.
[Off-topic] Dirk:
Women :rolleyes: She's probably feeling awkward and doesn't wanna deal. Her loss mate. When the next one comes along, who is ten times better... and everything is going really well, you'll look back at this and think 'close call...!'
[Off-topic] sakai4eva:
Weelll....

If that is how she responds to my advances, she actually shows me that she lacks maturity.

Now, if I can just find something else to focus my mind on...
[Off-topic] Dirk:
I mean, Sandwich...!
[Off-topic] sakai4eva:
Lolx. I explained over in the Mafioso thread...

I'm bored because I no longer have something to focus my mind on. It's feeling very much underutilized at the moment. Lolx
[Off-topic] Dirk:
You need a project. How about an excuse to get out and about on foot, spend some time exploring and appreciating the beautiful world outside?

i.e Photography! Take your camera on some trips outdoors and have a cathartic and creative experience.
[Off-topic] sakai4eva:
Too lazy to go outdoors.

I hate photography with my pesky cam-phone. And I have other things I wanna buy before I get to a camera.