yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Acer Iconia A500] fermunky:
This is all based on what your browser "broadcasts" to the web server. I remember way back in the day, some custom ROMs had an option in the settings menu, even on the native browser, to set your browser type to one of many options, including "Android OS", "BlackBerry", "IE", "FireFox" etc... Most web sites are the ones in control of which page to display to you based on what browser it detects hitting the page. Below is an example of one of my web site's access log

[IP Masked} - - [24/Aug/2011:14:55:57 -0400] "GET /forums/viewtopic.php?p=28441 HTTP/1.1" 200 11347 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Baiduspider/2.0; +http://www.baidu.com/search/spider.html)"
[IP Masked] - - [24/Aug/2011:14:56:09 -0400] "POST /forums/posting.php?mode=reply&f=11&t=2900 HTTP/1.1" 200 3144 "http://[URL Masked]/forums/posting.php?mode=reply&f=11&t=2900" "Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.3; en-us; DROID X2 Build/4.5.1A-DTN-117-15) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1"

It's from those logs where it says things like "Android 2.3.3" that tells a server which site to load. Unfortunately, most developers have hard coded anything as "Android" to be shown the mobile browser. Other browsers, like Dolphin and Opera, are either broadcasting a different type of browser, or give the option to.
[Acer Iconia A500] evelbug:
I have the settings in the stock browser set to viewing mode:desktop (under the advanced tab of the browser settings) and have not come accross any pages that get redirected to mobile. I'm running stock 3.1
[Acer Iconia A500] gammaRascal:
Right, you send USER_AGENT info when you connect to a site and based on that - typically what the OS is - the site can redirect.
[Acer Iconia A500] tkolev:
With 3.0.1 you had to type about:debug in the browser to get the debug menu in settings and there you could change the user agent string. In 3.1 we have that in the advanced menu but I still prefer the old way;-). Don't forget to clear the cache after you do that because the browser might have cached the redirect to the mobile site.
[Acer Iconia A500] jostarr:
Thanks for all the info. I have the stock browser, Dolphin and Opera Mobile. I have the user agent configured to Desktop in all 3 browsers. All 3 work on most, but not all sites. Only Opera works on all sites that I have tried. It is very disconcerting for sure as I really prefer the stock browser.
[Acer Iconia A500] fermunky:
Well, then it goes back to what I posted about the web sites themselves properly delivering the right site based on the user agent (thanks for reminding me of the name user agent gammaRascal!). The web designer has to write code to account for all the various user agents.
[Acer Iconia A500] jostarr:
There are some other differences too. Try this website in the stock browser,

dolphin and Opera: http://newyork.yankees.mlb.com/index.jsp?c_id=nyy

With the stock browser, the standings right below the picture on the left, is not complete.

with Dolphin, all looks like as on my PC.

with Opera, the page does not fit the screen.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] bvone21:
The Samsung Feeds & Updates widget was included in the rom I flashed. The rom is running Touch Wiz 3.

Can I install this from an apk?

I found this apk through a search but it didn't work, I tried dropping it in "/system/app" with root explorer and it wouldn't show in the list of widgets.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1007440
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] RaverX3X:
did you reboot after u did it?

if u did and u still dont see it drop it in data/app
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] bvone21:
Thanks for the reply, yes I did try a reboot.

I'll try dropping it in data/app like you mention.
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mrjeancw:
what is the wake lock issue? i have no idea what it is but i hear about it alot..

ive searched but i keep hitting threads with gazillion pages!
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] atapia984:
While your screen is off. There is a process running in the background. It could be anything.
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] HipKat:
It's when you get alike, a call or text, and your screen comes on, and stays on, even if you have screen-on time set to go off after x amount of minutes
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mrjeancw:
oh yea i def have this sometimes.
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dougjamal:
Go here for pointers.
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] BigRed Productions:
I thought it was the issue where the phone doesn't like to wake from a lock state. I know when i was running CM7.0 rc1 and the screen would lock and turn off, when I hit the power key, the screen wouldn't come back on. I usually had to press the power button then tap the screen to get it to turn on. Sometimes i had to just fight with the power button a few times to get anything to show. It was quite annoying. Might have been a kernal issue, not really sure as I updated to CM7.1 and a new kernal all at once.
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] HipKat:
It could be, or maybe we're both right :D
[HD2 Windows Mobile 6.5 Themes and Apps] mzobec:
Anibody here have Opera10-arm4/ whic could be signed or linked whatewer, with manila tv player. I have manila tv player but only work nbc and fox tv, when i try to load new station there is a message in att

wm 6.5. manila 2.5.1921 rom 1.66.479 (wwe) radio 2.07.51.22
[HD2 Windows Mobile 6.5 Themes and Apps] mzobec:
Is it possible that no one have some answer???
[HD2 Windows Mobile 6.5 Themes and Apps] mike2nl:
hi mzobec,

easy to figure out whats happend. Take a look in the ManilaTV.xml file. There you will find the tv links and the opera browser link.

Search for this file = \Windows\Opera10-armv4i.exe. If you can' t find this file, use the default. I think it was opera.exe. I hope that helps out to fix this.
[HD2 Windows Mobile 6.5 Themes and Apps] mzobec:
i will try and post result thanks
[HD2 Windows Mobile 6.5 Themes and Apps] mzobec:
I have just ManilaTV_Pages.xml & not ManilaTV.xml what sould i do
[HD2 Windows Mobile 6.5 Themes and Apps] mzobec:
Hey mike2nl have you any solution for me?
[HD2 Windows Mobile 6.5 Themes and Apps] mzobec:
Anibody can help me pleaseeeee!!!!!
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] WastedJoker:
Hello,

I followed the instructions at http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1103399 to flash CF-Root to v4.1 via Odin but after the reboot, I go to CWM and it shows as CF-Root 4.0

So I did the kernal flash via CWM - same thing, the version number does not change.

What have I done wrong?

I'd post in the above thread but I don't have sufficient privileges or posts. I tried searching the thread for version nubmer etc but no success.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] fr3quency:
It says 4.1 for me.

1)Don't flash it via CWM.

2)Go into download mode and use the .tar file inside the 4.1 .zip file(or whatever file type it is) as PDA in odin. :)

3)Profit?
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] WastedJoker:
I already did it via Odin but I'll do it again and see if that resolves the issue.

e:

Well, judging from the filename, it seems the kernal for my version is at 4.0 (KF3).

I just assumed it would be 4.1 for all kernals from the thread title.

Nevermind!
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] JJEgan:
The latest Kernels have 4.1 KF3 is an older Kernel .

jje
[Galaxy S II General] Nitroz:
Thanks alot for this mate, we need more of these to compare as people are looking for more battery rather than speed. In my opinion I prefer speed.

I'm going to be flashing Cognition 1.50 tonight for my next theming project and I'm going to test Hellcat Kernel to see how the battery is there.

Great work.
[Galaxy S II General] adz63:
i can give you some rough results from ROM/ROMS I HAVE USED

i have only had my sgs2 a few weeks and only really had time to test 1 ROM fully lite'ning rom with ninphetamine 2.02 and 2.05 kernals

on heavy use i was getting 26hours

i have just yesterday installed leomar revolution and altho going through the calibration process (i have calibrated , now just waiting for it to discharge so i can full charge again ) on ninphetamine 2.0.5, since calibrating 10hrs 10 mins ago with heavy use apart from the 5 hours sleep i have had im down to 20% battery which is not looking so good at the moment . after my full discharge and full charge i will be able to post more accurate , but looking at this its a huge battery drain compared to lite'ning rom . all the same settings are applied all the same sync times etc , wake locks seem to be better on leomar and everything else infact in beeterbatterystats , so i dont know why the big drain
[Galaxy S II General] Nitroz:
LeoMar's ROM is fully Odexed which may cause the issues with Battery drain and he also uses a ROM Kitchen which relies heavily on his ROM which is probably why it drains like a b****.
[Galaxy S II General] yeahtyeaht:
i think 2.6 is deodexed
[Galaxy S II General] adz63:
what does odexed and deodexed mean whats the differences ..

i read a bit about it but dont understand
[Galaxy S II General] Nitroz:
There isn't much difference, deodexing makes your boot faster and increases speed.

Odexing is just leaving as is for compatibilty, like for example JKays Themes & EDT Tweaks you need an odexed ROM or a Semi-Odexed ROM.

It was kind of confusion to me until I learnt about it.
[Galaxy S II General] adz63:
cool cheers chap
[Galaxy S II General] Nitroz:
No problem :) It's about time my knowledge came to good use :D
[Galaxy S II General] m444266:
heavy usage can be very subjective. :) can you try before going to bed to sleep the ff so we can get really see how long you battery last when compared to others.

apply a white background on an empty homescreen if possible.

disable the screen time out. i used widgetsoid app for this.

adjust to highest brightness.

then just leave it on while you sleep.

the next day while you charge your phone, you can go to battery usage, take a screeny(home+power button), then upload it here.. dont forget to include your rom and kernel used..

Thank you! the more data the better! :D
[Galaxy S II General] GadgetCheck:
Great mate!
[Galaxy S II General] TimmehPS3:
Epic thread, thnx man! Much appreciated, just switched from Ninphetamine to Speedmod thnx to this thread.
[Galaxy S II General] dentix:
Nice to see someone do this kind of tests. Im looking forward to see some results from the new Ninphetamine kernel 2.1.0.
[Galaxy S II General] Rasmusvm:
Well i didnt compare the kernels but im running lite'ning rom 6.1 with Ninphetamine 2.0.5 kernel, lots of sms this weekend and lowest brightness tho but 5hours and 40min screen time, I dont think thats bad at all ?
[Galaxy S II General] biba.butzemann:
switched between cf kernel and the one which comes with lightning mod 6.1 and i dont see a big difference
[Galaxy S II General] cCeT:
maybe on a heavy usage you can get that result but on stand by i got better result with ninphetamine even wifi was enabled.speedmod was consuming more power.
[Galaxy S II General] m444266:
yeah.. on stand by of course we'll all get better results.. but I'm afraid that would take me days/weeks/ probably months to test how long battery would last on stand by.. I need to get at least 10% drop on stand by and rather take the estimates.. but again 10% drop on standby may take long..

ANYWHOO... New results added! Used Jeffrey_Speedfrey kernel
[Galaxy S II General] majoodmud:
Thanks Man, that is a great info

please try It with 6.1 and give us the result if you have time
[Galaxy S II General] m444266:
will do that after I test ninph 2.1.1 and speedfrey 3.0
[Galaxy S II General] kungvn:
Great. :eek:
[Galaxy S II General] m2smoe:
I use latest Ninphetamine, but I think the best one for battery is probably 2.0.2.
[Galaxy S II General] ithehappy:
So why you are using the latest one?
[Galaxy S II General] m2smoe:
Well, because first of all, it's not like I really need better battery life, the way my phone is right now suits me perfectly. Also, I like to test things, and I like the FUSE/CUSE support from nin 2.1.2 (I can hook up my NTFS external hard drive).
[Galaxy S II General] Pfeffernuss:
Why do you think that 6 hours and 30 minutes is a bad result? I think it's a amazing result. Would be very happy with something like that. Over 9 hours of screen-on time is impossible using a "normal" brightness level and using the phone in a "normal" fashion.

Most people will have an empty battery after around 4 hours of screen-on time. When you game a lot this is especially true. When you browse a lot as well. So your result is very, very nice.
[Galaxy S II General] ithehappy:
Yes pal I know my result is very fine, but still with a simple voltage tweak if I could manage to get another 3 hours extra Display On time that would be a nice thing. I did the same test as m2some did, so there is a definite betterment with that kernel.

BTW- I've flashed Ninphetamine 2.1.2 and installed SetCPU. Now as I am not overclocked so I can use 1250 mV for my 1200 MHz, right? And also the same settings for other clock rates.

PS- I am confused. Why 1600 MHz and 1400 MHz are listed under SetCPU while I am not overclocked? And should I check 'Set on Boot' option?

Regards.
[Galaxy S II General] m2smoe:
setCPU is used to overclock, so 1400-1600Mhz is there, in case you want it (you choose this through profiles, or on main screen). As far as voltages go, do -25 by -25 and test each time to make sure everything is stable. The lower you can get, the better.
[Galaxy S II General] abhi021:
UPDATE

Here's an update from my above post.

Finally managed out 6+ hours and still have 41% battery left out. Am going to end the test here as my display has been on all 6.3 hrs though the temperature remained at 32 deg.C

I suppose if the test is extended could easily get 10 hrs on with the display.

below are the screen shots. :)

Looks like 2.0.2 works out the best for me. But soon will get the SGP glass shield and think will try out T27 speedmod kernal with it as it is modified with better screen sensitivity. Will begin the test tomorrow for the same.
[Galaxy S II General] abhi021:
You are on stock Rom i suppose, you need to root you device. download Cf root to root your device and than try. Also you could minus another 100mv from each parameters listed. I use 1175 mV for 1200, 1100 mv for 1000, 975 mv for 800, 875mv for both 500 & 200. Havn't set for 1400 and 1600 since I rarely find the to overclock. Mainly use setcpu with profiles like screen off and sleep time where have set CPU between 500 to 200mhz.
[Galaxy S II General] ithehappy:
Well I don't had the idea that a Kernel will support Overclocking up to 1600 MHz! I though Tegrak Overclock was needed for that. Anyway.

I have set the Voltages as yours, same as in your siggy. I didn't touch the Main profile. And added only one profile, 'Screen Off', 500 MHz max, 200 MHz min, On Demand scaling, tried Conservative, but it's taking a little bit long to wake up, I don't like it. Please check the screen shots, say if there is anything wrong.

Oh, How will I do the Stable test? What software is needed?

Regards.
[Galaxy S II General] goldbergx:
Software called "stability test". Settings look good - please note that something that works on someone else's cpu might not work on yours. Would suggest taking everything 25 mV higher and then checking how much lower you can go using the "scaling stability test" (an option in the stability test app)

Do not check the "set on boot" on the undervolting setup till you have something that runs stably for 30 odd minutes.
[Galaxy S II General] m2smoe:
yes, exactly what goldbergx said.
[Galaxy S II General] m444266:
shortcut

heres a shortcut for those who can't wait until 0%..

get yourself a battery monitoring app that can calculate estimates. I use "Battery Monitor Widget" app from the market.

with your test environmen. do a full charge and start your test. but now you can jsut wait until you're at 60% or 50%..

after that you can just launch the app, click on the "Estimates button". then you can add the estimated time "using average since (un)plug" to your current time on battery.

more or less that will calculate when you'll get 0% using (as stated) the average since (un)plug.. its an calculated estimate, better than any guestimate. :)
[Galaxy S II General] poch_1421:
have u tried neophyte's mirage kernel for your tests?
[Galaxy S II General] m444266:
nope. not on my list..(yet)..

btw currently testing ninph202 and its not looking good.
[Galaxy S II General] zzz777:
many people report that Jeffrey-SpeedFrey_Kernel 3.0.0 has good battery life but no one tested it

BTW 2.0.2 has good notes :D
[Galaxy S II General] f4lkon:
look@1 page "Jeffrey_SpeedFrey3.0.0 : 4h 33m "
[Galaxy S II General] pileot:
Ready for tonight's test, which kernel should i stress test now?
[Galaxy S II General] lestat1929:
Hi,

please try RAGE v1-t27. It's based on speedmod + uv.

Regards

lestat1929
[Galaxy S II General] zzz777:
oups, i missed it so i let RAGEmod-v2-T27 :D
[Galaxy S II General] ithehappy:
Well I had to follow a reference that's why I followed m2smoe's. Anyway, I tried to to run Stability Test at 25 mV higher than previous and after 20 mins the phone got turned off and from then only once it turned on just for 2 minutes and turned off again. I am trying to turn it on for last one hour but no response. Is the phone completely DEAD?

Any ideas? I am just trying to turn it on. Tried battery out, charging, nothing works. Enough of this tests, as soon as it turns on the first thing I am gonna do is uninstall SetCPU and go back to CF kernel.

Regards.
[Galaxy S II General] darylimjz:
Hi guys, first post here on this thread and on xda.

Just want to say that I've not had good experience with speedmod t27. Both battery life and performance weren't up to expectations (I apologise for not having actual results to share though). Anyone else feel the same? Also, I'm not sure if its due to the kernel, but I wasn't able to post with my xda app (option wasn't there. Weird. I was logged in.) Had to use browser to post this.

Add: I will run on this kernel for one more day before deciding to switch to something else. Probably a Jeffery one or latest ninphetamine. 2.0.5 was good, expecting better for 2.1.2.

Running on litening 6.1 btw.
[Galaxy S II General] TimmehPS3:
Try Ragemod t27 and undervolt with SetCPU to the settings below. I'm also running Lite'ning ROM 6.1 and my batterylife is very good.

1400Mhz - 1250mV

1200Mhz - 1150mV

1000Mhz - 1050mV

800Mhz - 925mV

500Mhz - 850mV

200Mhz - 800mV
[Galaxy S II General] zzz777:
I installed setcpu but don't know how to configure it for my SGS2

when started i choose "autodetect"

can you please help me ?
[Galaxy S II General] m444266:
so will there be any difference between ragemod and speedmod under the same voltage settings? I just wanted to ask before testing this.

all I know is that it doesn't work on all kernels. it depends on what kernel you are using for your device. I can't help you very much with the configurations, I believe there's a thread for it tho. you might be able to get some help there.
[Galaxy S II General] zzz777:
i'm using RAGE v2-t27 , configured setcpu like TimmehPS3 and cheked "set on boot" is it right or i missed something else ? :rolleyes:
[Galaxy S II General] pileot:
Day 3, here we go!

Recap:

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=17000771&postcount=160

Kernel:

2.6.35.7-RAGEmod-v1-T27

ravenger@RAvenGEr-VirtualBox )

Rom:

DarkyROM2 XXKH3 Base R2

Drain Time:

5130 seconds

4.147V to 2.994V

Max Temp 55 degrees C

Keep in mind this is an EXTREME DRAIN test, even a few seconds means a lot of diffence in real life usage. Im also not using setcpu or any other tweaks, just keeping the default settings of each kernel.
[Galaxy S II General] TimmehPS3:
I'd wait with "set on boot" for about a week. Because you're undervolting, your phone might become unresponsive, and if you set it on boot it might result in big ass problems. Just uncheck Set on boot for about a week and when you haven't had any random reboots/freezes in a week, check it again.

Edit;

For even more juice; use SetCPU profiles.
[Galaxy S II General] obionenairobi:
do I understand correctly that speedmod t27 does not support setcpu?

when I open the progam I do no longer have the list of voltages under advanced
[Galaxy S II General] TimmehPS3:
Not entirely, speedmod doesn't support undervolting. It does support SetCPU manual speed and profiles though....

RAGEmod t27 is a modified Speedmod t27 kernel, RAvenGEr added undervolt and BLN-support...
[Galaxy S II General] ithehappy:
Update- Kept the battery out for 5 mins and then it booted but as soon the screen goes off it never boots again.

Any ideas are welcome, I am facing a weird problem here.
[Galaxy S II General] abhi021:
Ref to my post 187

After my test on Lt V6.1 with ninphetamine 2.0.2 I decided to test the Speedmod T27 kernal.

The result with nin. 2.0.2 with display at full brightness was 6 hr 20 mins with 41% battery left out. With nin.2.0l.2 had also UV.

After testing with Speedmod T27 ( running at 1200mhz ) compairing the same display time that on nin.2.0.2 of 6 hr 20 mins, I have 44% battery left out. 3% better than nin.2.0.2 kernal.

All I can say is looks like T27 kernal is just a wee bit better in comparison to Nin. 2.0.2 kernal.

Next up would be the Ragemod T27 kernal.
[Galaxy S II General] zzz777:
it seems that you have "data off"

just to understand our test : all over your tests you don't use your gs2 for calls, internet or anything else ? :eek:
[Galaxy S II General] abhi021:
Data is on and so is the wifi along with juice defender.
[Galaxy S II General] rocketpaul:
can you get into download mode?
[Galaxy S II General] m444266:
ninphetamin 2.0.2 result out

that's alright.. as long as they are consistent with other tests.

fyi had wifi on with some push mail and some sms from nagios
[Galaxy S II General] ithehappy:
No, absolutely nothing.
[Galaxy S II General] rocketpaul:
Might be an idea to try a different battery?
[Galaxy S II General] TimmehPS3:
I think you're UV'ed to much. Try to boot again and turn of voltage control in SetCPU.
[Galaxy S II General] khein:
I agree with the post above. Try a different battery with charge. As some semi-bricked SGS2 won't charge the battery anymore until it is unbricked.
[Galaxy S II General] zzz777:
so tests are not equal :rolleyes:

it depend of wifi signal, frequency of push mail, sms quantity ... :rolleyes:
[Galaxy S II General] rocketpaul:
surely the uv setting doesnt activate until the phone has booted?
[Galaxy S II General] ithehappy:
It turned on for about 2-3 minutes and I uninstalled SetCPU, also did Wiped Cache+Dalvik cahce+Factory Reset, then as soon as the green Android icon came it's not booting anymore.
[Galaxy S II General] abhi021:
Can you enable it to download mode and flash the stock kernal, clear the cache and dalvik and reboot.
[Galaxy S II General] vtngmmk:
me too, battery life seem ok or even better with speedmod T27. But having use for 2days, i had always disconnect with 3g hspda network. Something browse keep sending out but no coming in data flow. Everytime i just switch to plane mode and de plane mode just to get back signal. So decided to switch back to nimptemine 2.1.12 solve all those hiccup. My experience with speedmod T27. anyone face it or just me.
[Galaxy S II General] m444266:
I also scrolled the screen, openned the app drawer, checked the battery a number of times and I did not count. so yeah, their not equal but close to equal(for me) as possible.. the frequency of the mail and sms are quite same coming from a 24/7 service alerts. still, c'mon, receiving a few extra/less sms and email, no calls, will not make any 'significant' difference. Usage graphs attached have a somewhat linear line from 100 down to 0 which would somehow suggest a constant usage.
[Galaxy S II General] m2smoe:
While you were doing StabilityTest, did you check the temperature? How hot was the phone before this problem started?
[Galaxy S II General] ithehappy:
After 20 mins it was around 46/47°C.

Update- Had it plugged in AC charger, suddenly the green battery icon came up from nowhere and I enabled Download Mode and flashed the Stock Kernel. Then it was on about 3-4 mins and then again got off!

Tried to re flash the firmware, but it got disconnected 3 times straight.

I am going mad here.