[Droid Incredible Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] loonatik78:
Right here, Jackass. I never said nothing will ever compare. Pay attention... perhaps your abject lack of being informed is your problem. Now, allow me to school you.

The dInc2 and Tbolt use a completely different CPU/GPU on top of having more memory. Gingerbread has already been pushed to the dInc2, and I expect it to arrive on the Tbolt before year's end. Seeing as how I already run GB with Sense 3.0, I would be surprised if anyone could honestly spot that the Tbolt is slower than the EVO 3D just by using it. It runs Sense 3.0 smoother than the dInc runs CM7. Obviously you're one of those boobs when asked the question "If you had to get a phone today, what would you get?", you'd reply with "I'm gonna wait", which isn't even an answer to the question. TODAY, the ONLY phone that's technically superior to the Tbolt is the EVO 3D, but that phone isn't at all tempting because it has no LTE.

That said, LTE is probably the single biggest selling point on the Tbolt; a fact dInc loveboys seem to dismiss like it's just some gimmick. 32Mbps is NOT a gimmick, and the characteristics of it's connectivity makes the Tbolt the the most advanced device on ANY network. While the CPU/GPU are simply generational upgrades, the functionality of the MDM9600 puts it in a class ONLY the Tbolt occupies.

Seeing as how the common thought with dInc owners today is "I'm gonna wait for the Tbolt killer!", that leads one to assume the dInc is sufficiently powerful to accomplish virtually any task it's put to. Mine sure seems to be, so long as it has nothing to do with connectivity or graphics. If that assumption is sound, then it's reasonable to say the Tbolt and dInc2 are plenty muscular to accomplish all but the most daunting tasks. Since I don't play 3D games on a 4.3" screen, I can't imagine outstripping what the Tbolt does in the next 2 years. I definitely wasn't going to soldier on for another another year to see what MIGHT come down the pipe.

So, given the unequaled functionality of the Tbolt, and that it does things NO OTHER CDMA DEVICE DOES, and does it FASTER than any other CDMA device, it's a significant upgrade. It's really nice to not have my download interrupted by a call. It's nice to download a 300MB file in 2 minutes or less. It's nice to stream ANYTHING, regardless of how rich the content is. It's nice to have a battery that lasts a day and a screen I can read outside. I don't know anyone who'd say LTE is a "minor upgrade", and the friends I have with Tbolts came from dIncs and wouldn't ever go back. It's certainly fair to say LTE is an upgrade at least as important as a CPU, probably MORE SO, since CPUs outstripped what a 3G connection can provide back in the dInc days.

So, Jackass, to date the Tbolt is "the best phone ever". That is a FACT. Did I say the Tbolt is a major upgrade from the dInc for various reasons, which I've described? Sure as hell did, because it IS. Am I saying the dInc to is a major upgrade to the dInc? No, and it obviously wasn't meant to be. It's just every single thing about the dInc done a LOT better. I hope you're not so stupid as to read into this something I didn't say, but if you are, feel free to check out my other posts on this subject for clarity. Or, read the link in my sig.

Of course, if your name is Cleetus, your sister is your aunt, and you don't have LTE already, LTE doesn't really matter much. In that case, your Vigor will take exceptional pictures mom's 3 tooth grin and shoot excellent videos of you and your sis bumpin uglies.