yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[HTC Sensation] willhub:
I keep getting notifications popping up from the mail app saying I have new unread emails, I have auto sync turned off and I can't find any settings to stop it in the mail app (note not GMail app I have that deleted)

Thanks.
[HTC Sensation] tbiz592:
I'm running CM7 on an Evo 4G.

I'm having the same issue. Have you or anyone else figured out how to stop this from happening? My corporate email (exchange server with stock email app) always syncs even when I uncheck Auto-sync in Settings>Accounts & sync>Auto-Sync.

The only way I can stop the account from syncing is to change the "Inbox check frequency" from "Automatic (Push)" to "None".

I'm hoping to figure out how to make this app respect the phones syncing settings and not sync when I uncheck the Auto-sync box.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
[Eee Pad Transformer Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dc13:
Ok so the navy exchange is being retarded. Still thinks i have the transfprmer on order but i just got a email saying its discontinued any one else here of see that. Ill post the link when i get to work im driving to it now.
[Eee Pad Transformer Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] andrewklau:
Maybe because the TF101G is coming out. (3g model) (it's on their support site now)

or... tf102? Transformer 2 but most likely just a buggy system message.. But I doubt transformer 2 lol, icecream hasn't even been released on the "Nexus Prime".
[Eee Pad Transformer Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dc13:
hmmm i edited my OP to show what i got. i orded the 32GB 2 weeks before it came out.
[Eee Pad Transformer Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tornadog:
the way etailers are undercutting the price, I would imagine the TF101 is past the curve in its lifecycle.
[Eee Pad Transformer Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] aibo:
I doubt it's discontinued, the transformer sells very well. So I don't see why asus stops selling it. My guess is Exchange can't provide you with the device for some reasons, but said it's discontinued.
[Eee Pad Transformer Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Underwater Mike:
Newegg has it (or did two days ago) bundled with the dock for $50 off the full price. unless you're getting a better price through the exchange, just order it from the Egg.
[Eee Pad Transformer Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] buffalosolja42:
Better not be

I just got me and my girl transformers for our birthdays and she got us the docks, and unless the 3g version is free its not for me I have enough wireless dollars going out.
[Eee Pad Transformer Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Rumbleweed:
Might just mean that they have discontinued carrying it especially in light of all the maneuvering (Multiple orders/ cancellations) that went on after initial release
[Eee Pad Transformer Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] situman:
It wouldnt make sense to discontinue such a popular product
[Eee Pad Transformer Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] lathanub:
This just worries me more about buying this, now :/. I was very interested in purchasing the Transformer but if something better is going to come out really soon then I won't bother.

It's so frustrating that I've come in at the time the current TF101 is becoming out of date. That's my own fault for not being current enough, I guess. Should the people who've wondered about buying (such as myself) hold off for a little while longer, perhaps?
[Eee Pad Transformer Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] hardy81:
There's always something better coming soon. And a Transformer is a good buy.
[Eee Pad Transformer Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] PhoenixFx:
This doesn't mean anything, because their supplier is not necessarily Asus. Most probably some other 3rd party wholesaler and they must have discontinued selling it. That doesn't man the product is discontinued.
[Eee Pad Transformer Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] solom01:
Just keep in mind that even if a product sells extremely well, if it's a low margin product like a tablet where a seller is only making a little profit to begin with, it doesn't take a lot of returns/swaps before it becomes an item a seller doesn't want to sell. How many posts have you seen here where people had returned a transformer 2, 3 or even 4 times to get a perfect unit? Although low margins/price don't mean that a consumer shouldn't expect a good unit, as someone who works for a consumer electronics retailer I can assure you that if any product bcomes a liability in terms of cost we stop selling it. Obviously although we pride ourselves on customer service we are ultimately in the business to make a profit, so regardless of how popular a unit is it has to pay its own way. This is especially true for a company selling on the internet, since the Walmart idea of having loss leaders doesn't work - people go to your site and buy what they need, they don't often add other higher margin items.
[Eee Pad Transformer Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] An0mander:
There will always be something better. The Quad Core tablets are suppose to be arriving this fall I thought, so if you hold out until then that could be good. I got my Tablet back in June and am very happy with it.

Hell I am never satisfied though. I got a new Laptop (Sager) in May, Tablet (Transformer) in June, and now I want to build a new Desktop (custom build). If I do the desktop my wife is going to kill me!:p
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sachilleas:
I'm using Samsung's messaging client and I've noticed that when I receive an SMS, the time displayed is not the actual sent time but the time it was received by me.

Is there any way to fix this ??
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Archer:
1. Read the forum rules

2. This is general, not Q&A. This is a question.

3. Search before you ever ask any questions. See here...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmvCpR45LKA

4. Finally, here's a thread discussing your question...

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1181716&highlight=text+message+time
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sachilleas:
You are right about the Q&A . You are wrong about posting this thread. I ask something different ....
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] AaronUK:
I asked this in my thread a while ago. See here:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1141973
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sachilleas:
This is a shame. Does handcent or gosms pro solve the issue ?
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] AaronUK:
I tried both on a previous old firmware but not newer firmwares. If you try it let me know the results.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Kirsebaer:
I think we all have the same problem with the time stamps, when the phone has been turned off or without connection. Whenever you receive text messages it writes when you receive them and not when they were sent. It really blows. It it not the same problem as the one you describe though, but the same as AaronUK has :)
[HTC Sensation] Michigan Jason:
So I rooted and installed leo rom and it was nice. Wanted to try the neon pyramid rom, installed and all was fine.. I noticed though it seemed as if the battery wasnt charging like it did before. So I chose to let it discharge all the way down to 0 and re charge. All was well, until I went to plug it into the charger and now I get a blinking orange light for a while, then it just turns off (no light.) The phone will not turn on and the only light i get is when i first plug it into the charger it blinks maybe 20 times and thats it.

Are there any tricks I can try to wake this thing from the dead? What should I do?

Any help is appreciated, I need my phone back!
[HTC Sensation] svdploeg:
Why did you post this in the Sensation forum? You seem to have a Nexus S, see your signature.

Back to the problem:

What happens is you remove the battery, put it back in and hold the volume down button and power button till you see something...does this work?
[HTC Sensation] redbullcat:
This is a known problem and can be easily remedied.

Basically, on some Sensation's, the custom recovery img (CWM) doesn't let you charge when the phone is completely discharged.

To correct this, follow these steps:

Take out the battery and put it back in

Plug in the USB cable to charge the phone

Leave it for an hour or two

Come back

Unplug USB cable and try turning the Sensation on. If this doesn't work, take out the battery and put it back in. DO NOT plug the USB cable back in.

You may have to do this a few times to get it right. For more info, look at this thread.

Hope that helps :)
[HTC Sensation] Michigan Jason:
I must update my signature...ive got both, but I get nothing when trying to boot to the bootloader
[HTC Sensation] Michigan Jason:
Trying it now, i will let you know, thanks
[HTC Sensation] Michigan Jason:
Tried a couple times, ive got nothing, is there something i am missing?
[HTC Sensation] Michigan Jason:
Ok, the above method did not work, HOWEVER I found another thread and tried it.

I cut the usb cable open, and connected the positive and negative to the leads on the phone, inserted battery and it powered on, now I am charging and good to go. Whew!

Thanks guys!
[HTC Sensation] redbullcat:
Aha, yeah. Every phone is different I guess :)

Glad you got it working though :)
[T-Mobile myTouch 4G Slide] bmakk2055:
Any body have a link to download the ones that come on the phone? Please pm me
[Droid Incredible Themes and Apps] dkris2020:
Ok ive looked around but i have had no luck in finding a red sense 3.0 skin. I would make my own, if i knew how 2. i wanted something more on the lines of the

skins from htc hub in terms of style.
[Droid Incredible Themes and Apps] localceleb:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1144572

There is one there that they call red, but it looks kind of pink in the screen shot....might want to give it a try though.
[Droid Incredible Themes and Apps] dkris2020:
tried it b4, all the links r dead........
[Droid Incredible Themes and Apps] jessejames111981:
I think the skin makers are very anti red. Plus have a hard on for "glass" style skins. I've been on the look out for a 2.1 or 3.0 red skin but no luck. I keep running across transparent glass style skins everywhere
[T-Mobile LG G2x] exPos3D:
When i try to push apps and etc, it goes directly to the phone but when i plug in my phone and do it through the usb it gives me whats on the sdcard and not the phone. but when i use i execute it like such "adb push C:\APP.APK /sdcard" and it still does that.
[HTC EVO 3D] Neo3D:
I'm not terribly optimistic this will go anywhere, but I signed it because I consider software patents to be the scourge of the software industry. They are especially deadly for start-ups and small companies working on innovative new products - exactly the people patents are supposed to protect.

http://www.petitiononline.com/pasp01/petition.html
[HTC EVO 3D] CheesyNutz:
the patent system in general needs a massive over haul
[HTC EVO 3D] DoctorComrade:
Don't know why software patents are bad. All you have to do is not do what the claims specifically state and you're clear.

Sent from my Shooter.
[HTC EVO 3D] Craysh:
The problem is that the people approving the patents aren't technical at all, and they're approving them despite obvious prior art.
[HTC EVO 3D] phatmanxxl:
Disent apple have the patent of "LCD that produces light"? That almost every electronic with a screen.
[HTC EVO 3D] EniGmA1987:
No not exactly, they have a patent on a screen you can touch to input information. So They own and "invented" the touchscreen now according to the judge. All the banks, supermarkets, UPS, FedEx, Tablet makers, Smartphones, etc etc etc etc better beware, using those touchscreens is an illegal act because the company that made them has not paid for a license to use them.
[HTC EVO 3D] 4dthinker:
And before apple came out with anything touchscreen I had touchscreen PDAs. Before that I was touching all sorts of things and getting a response. I'd say a copyright should be fine for software, but not a patent on actions. When I used to write programs I could do most action/response routines 4 or 5 ways depending on the programming language used, and if that wasn't original enough I'd code it (differently) in another program language.

IMO any concept that is so obvious as touching a screen should be granted an anti-patent. In other words, it should be against the law for any one person/company to claim the right to it.
[HTC EVO 3D] ftc_osiris:
Do you really think that removing software patents would help small businesses???????!!!!!!!

People who disapprove of software patents don't understand that if software patents were not available to the small start ups, the established companies would simply steal whatever new process the start up came up with and put the start up out of business.

No start up has a prayer of getting funding without some protection in the form of patents.

I should know, I am a patent attorney and I do a lot of work with small inventors.

Believe me, Microsoft, Apple, Sun, etc have no problem taking a great idea developed by a outsider and adding it to their own products.

There is no protection in copyrights for the small inventor. As long as the big company recodes the innovation when adding it to their own software, there is no copyright infringement.

Now I know you're going to flame me and tell me that I have a vested interest in patents as a patent attorney but I am used to it.

Think about it this way. I don't like that some people publicly say certain blatantly untrue and nearly slanderous things. Still, I wouldn't want to take away the freedom of speech to stop them. They would probably continue to say those things and I would no longer have my own freedom of speech.

Similarly, the giants have lots of patents that protect their market niche and it does make it harder for startups to carve out their own niche. The problem with getting rid of patents is that there would no longer be any way for the small business to carve out its own niche. The giants would no longer use patents to war amongst themselves but they would not longer have to worry about a start up putting out a new OS with great features that are somehow patented by the startup and which the giants could not simply steal or copy into their own product.

There is also no justification for saying that software patents should all be invalidated simply because the United States Patent Office has granted some patents that prior art should have precluded.

Fix the Patent and Trademark Office's examination quality, don't punish the inventor.
[HTC EVO 3D] ftc_osiris:
First, things that are obvious now were not always obvious

before they were thought up.

Second, there is such a thing as a quasi anti-patent but no one uses it. Statutory Invention Registration.

Basically, if you come up with something or feel that it is obvious, you can describe it and file it with the Patent Office.

It serves are prior art as of the day it is filed with the PTO and if you disclosed the touchscreen (for example), the examiner's will use that to reject patent applications directed to the touchscreen you disclosed and filed after the day you filed your SIR.

That said, I have yet to have a SIR cited against a patent application. I have never heard of a SIR being filed for that matter.

Anyhow, all I want to point out is that there are two sides to the patent right.

Yes, big companies have many patents to things that they have developed over the years that protect them from start ups developing the same things.

Nothing but patents stop big companies from taking any good idea that comes out and adding it to their own products.
[HTC EVO 3D] ftc_osiris:
I would like to see this all encompassing touchscreen patent that Apple supposedly has.

I know that it doesn't exist because touchscreens are more than 20 years old.

Patents are not forever.

They expire.

Patents are also rarely broad enough that you cannot design around them. Show it to me and I will explain ten ways to avoid infringing the patent.

That said, Apple does innovate quite a bit. On the other hand, so does every other major smartphone company. Its a very competitive industry.
[Galaxy Tab 10.1v Android Development] rs125:
Rs Series ROM presents:

Rs HDBlog Galaxy v1.0 con HoneyComb 3.1 + TouchWiz

​

Bug ROM:

Camera not working.

3g now working.

Porting in progress ;)

Changelog 1.0

Initial Release

Removed script kernel

Added Kernel by Pershoot

Thanks:

...to seo for help me

...to pershoot for his kernel

...to dsixda for his kichen
[Galaxy Tab 10.1v Android Development] rs125:
DOWNLOAD P7510UEKMB Based:

Rs HDBlog Galaxy 1.0

NB: Per installare questa ROM dovete scaricare il Soft-Wipe per l'EXT4 che trovate al post n.3!!​
[Galaxy Tab 10.1v Android Development] sitiweb-italia.com:
vado?

la provo? :)

non riesco a darmi pace, tutte le volte che riflasho devo reinstallare i programmi, login e password, e sopratutto mettere i giochi che usa mio figlio :P

Bravo RS la proverò subito...:)
[Galaxy Tab 10.1v Android Development] rs125:
It is still available :D

Non è ancora disponibile :D
[Galaxy Tab 10.1v Android Development] the_arcade_mani:
link is broken bro
[Galaxy Tab 10.1v Android Development] sitiweb-italia.com:
RS sono Fabiottocento sul hdblog ;)

Ma che è un pesce d'aprile ? :D:D
[Galaxy Tab 10.1v Android Development] rs125:
Ahahah...ciao Fabio :D Comunque è disponibile da ora...è un TEST e la camera non funziona ancora :p

Hahaha ... Hello Fabio: D However, it is available now ... is a TEST and the camera still does not work: p

ROM ONLINE ;)
[Galaxy Tab 10.1v Android Development] rs125:
Link now working ;)
[Galaxy Tab 10.1v Android Development] outcorpse:
I tried everything.

I have unlocked bootloader, installed busybox, installed wipe.zip, recovery 4.0.0.4, and the rom. when it boots it just stays at Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1v. I have P7100 10.1v TAB.
[Galaxy Tab 10.1v Android Development] rs125:
Download the ROM and try again ;)
[Galaxy Tab 10.1v Android Development] outcorpse:
H man. Would really love your rom. Tried again. Just hangs at bootup screen. I've got 10.1v 7100 model. Any ideas. I've tried others roms which works but i want to try yours!
[Galaxy Tab 10.1v Android Development] rs125:
Make a wipe and re download my rom ;)
[EVO 4G General] Neo3D:
I'm not terribly optimistic this will go anywhere, but I signed it because I consider software patents to be the scourge of the software industry. They are especially deadly for start-ups and small companies working on innovative new products - exactly the people patents are supposed to protect.

http://www.petitiononline.com/pasp01/petition.html
[EVO 4G General] MaxCarnage:
If we get rid of software patents altogether, then startups and small companies will never get off the ground because as soon as they release something bigger companies will just take that work, repackage it, and drown out the small company with their vast marketing and advertising funds.

So who is being helped by eliminating software patents?
[EVO 4G General] lithid-cm:
Most larger companies are not innovative enough to just uptake a new project. they are usually interested in the profit. Not the innovation.
[EVO 4G General] MaxCarnage:
So, let's say that I am an independent developer (I am not) and I come up with an awesome new word processor that has amazing features that are unique and will revolutionize the industry. There are no more software patents so I package up my innovative new software, spend time gathering investors, create a small marketing campaign, and get my software boxed and stocked at Best Buy.

Microsoft sees my software and takes my designs and integrates them into Word. They then spend millions of dollars (pocket change to them, my entire company to me) advertising Word and getting my software pushed down into oblivion.

Where is the benefit to me as the developer in getting rid of software patents, unless I am a FOSS advocate and never intended to make money off my work anyway?

EDIT: By the way, I am not trying to troll or be argumentative just for the sake of it; I am genuinely trying to understand the benefit of eliminating software patents.
[EVO 4G General] cmdrogogov:
I'm not keen on removing software patents all together as I do believe in their ability to encourage innovation.

However, the current system is FUBAR and needs to be scrapped (which will never happen because any move towards reform represents a direct attack on the power base of the very wealthy - any prospective legislation would be DOA before it even got into committee)

Patent term lengths need to be drastically reduced to perhaps ten years tops with progressively higher patent fees to renew the term ($100-$1000-$10,000-$100,000 etc.) they need to be far more specific in scope than they currently are, and the way such infringement is handled internationally needs to be harmonized.

Such reform would have to go hand-in-hand with strong fair use protections for the general public.

Without a strong populist movement towards such a result, I doubt any politician would touch it as it would mean zero campaign contributions from the only entities capable of bankrolling an effective election campaign though.

Patents can only encourage innovation if innovation is NOT stifled by ridiculously broad language and obscenely long patent terms. Lifetime+90 years is absolutely insane.

The realtipping point is likely to be when corporations start uploading simulations of real animal and human consciousness (which will be possible one day soon) to digital storage and start trying to patent them - because the direction this society has chosen to head in will only result in precisely the above occurring.
[EVO 4G General] Award Tour:
Logic in the EVO 4G forum? I must be in heaven.
[EVO 4G General] Award Tour:
This is weird argument. It doesn't take much innovation (if any) to steal someone else's innovation. By doing that they also diminish a competitor's advantage, possibly/probably increasing their own profit.
[EVO 4G General] MaxCarnage:
Yeah, that was kind of the point I was trying to make. If companies can just steal ideas from independent developers without consequence, then there's no need for innovation once you become the top dog company. Wouldn't RIM be happier today if they could have repackaged and rebranded iOS during that first year that Apple entered the smartphone market instead of desperately trying make something competitive? Or PALM or anyone else?

Knowing that your hard work is up for grabs the second someone else gets wind of it isn't going to encourage innovation.
[EVO 4G General] matt2053:
I'm opposed to software patents, but not because of some noble ideal about protecting small developers. They don't deserve state-granted monopoly privilege and artificial profits any more than the big companies do. Rather, I oppose them because they stifle innovation. For many, many years, taking existing software and tweaking and improving it was the norm, and it's how software naturally develops. Patents stifle the ability to make things better, and we as a society pay the price.

Frankly I find the idea of patents in general to be counter-intuitive and in some cases outright immoral. Let's suppose we are all cave-men, and no technology exists. We are all naked hairy homo sapiens living in caves. Then one day I figure out how to cut down a tree and build a house out of wood. It's completely insane to think that I could "patent" that idea, and force you to pay me if you want to build your own house out of your own wood. No, you'd see it and you'd build a house of your own and you'd tell me to **** off if I asked you for royalties. And guess what, people will still be motivated to innovate without patents. Patents make innovation a zero-sum game when it doesn't have to be that way.

Just my opinion and I see the validity of both sides. Just sharing my viewpoint, not interested in arguing.
[EVO 4G General] mattykinsx:
I think it's more important that the patent system get a makeover with more specific rules.

It should not be allowed to get a patent on a product based on the extremely liberal rules descriptions they allow now.

Look at the SG Tab 10.1" versus iPad 2.

Perfect example of what I mean.
[EVO 4G General] github:
You are confusing patents with copyright. If Microsoft copied your designs without a license, you sue for copyright infringement.

A decent quote from Wikipedia: