[T-Mobile LG G2x] tombaker1:
according to you, jrwingate, the G2x has an 80% failure rate. Really? Well guess what some moron is going to quote you out, put it into a lawsuit. Oh wait that already been done, I guess with your 80% defect rate, they are going to need to amend the complaint.

Do some users have conflicts with there installed software and the G2x. Yes, but its a small fraction. However because the most likely people to have a large established set of apps, and customizations, are posting on these threads, you have the software conflicts being reflected and posted about. Don't you wonder why its some people that continually have issues, and others don't. Well you you are restoring a backup, to a different hardware, you are going to have the same problems.

You have a guy Ducter, making things up, and posting them out. He has 4 working phones, he updates them with his choice of non-stable custom ROMs and then he blames the phones as being defective. Its documented.

You don't even own the phone, but you have been beating the drum that the G2x is a junk device. Its fabrication.

I did a post asking to see the screen bleed, for someone to show a picture of it, in any situation other than in a completely dark room, with the brightness all the way up, causing an auto-exposure camera accentuating the brightness. A bunch of people hemmed and hooted, but nobody showed a picture.

All these people who had issues with the phone, real or self caused, could return the phone for a full refund. They didn't do that.

Those facts remain, after all your conspiracy theories, and psycho-babble.

I can get out of my G2x if I so wish, right now its the fastest phone out, its free with a new contract, and the screen used is a H-IPS screen with excellent performance and viewing angles. Yes the Super AMOLED+ is great, but this screen is on par with it, and I can read text better on a G2x, which a decent part of my actual usage.

The guy doing the lawsuit, did not return his phone until after his 30 days were up, even as he was flushing custom ROMs on it. When he did receive a replacement he restored his settings and programs automatically, the same settings and programs that were problematic. He state he only kept that phone for hours. Another case clogging up the court system instead of him simply taking responsibility for his own actions. And he wants to be emblematic for an entire class. Not a chance.

1. You have to believe that the plaintiff, never looked at the screen, and never read any reviews, which on page 7 of the complaint, it actually quotes that Engadget mentions the screen.

2. You have to assume it to be true as the complaint states that the Plantiff would never buy the phone if he knew about it, that is a given. Yet the Plantiff never mitigates what he now says are his damages by simply return the phone immediately. He keeps the phone with the screen.

3. You have to take documented cases of Ducter and other who rooted there perfectly working phones only to CAUSE them to reboot.

4. Given 3, you have to accept as a jury that plaintiffs, own actions in rooting is phone did not cause the problem he now seeks compensation for. (Plaintiff's unclean hands were cause for damages he now seeks)

5. Since the phone failed as part of the restore process, you have to prove that the prior rooting, and thus the setting saved by Google, did not then cause a conflict on the new device.

6. You have to believe as the complaint states that the screen bleeding is so bad it makes its functionally unacceptable. You have to believe that when no such documentation in photographs exist. When you see the bleeding on a sample phone, it not gonna sway the jury.

7. You have to jump over the hurdle that LG and not T-Mobile is the proper defendant. Probably need to include Google as well, its branded as a Google product, ever look at the back cover. Certainly Google has some sort of warranty of merchantability for a product that on the box art, proudly displaying. Google is responsible for the OS.

8. Plaintiff will have to show that T-Mobile as the administrator of the LG warranty and exchange program, failed to do so. Plaintiff says he received a replacement, yet contends the defendant did not try to cure or replace or fix the phone. It can not be both.

9. Plaintiff claims LG did not cure the dispute, yet Plaintiff did cure the issue, and fails to claim any specific damages for a specific period. The Plaintiff has switched to a different carrier. Which would not be emblematic of any class as plaintiff contends.

10. You have to believe that all G2x are defective, as built, period. And because of this a entire class wide recall of ALL phones is required.

11. Though the complaint calls for action against LG's co-conspirators, for some crazy reason, the lawsuit omits that as being T-Mobile, which is branded and stamped on every G2x sold.

So this guy, a guy who does not return his phone, he claims is inherantly defective, does not even get his replacement phone until over 40 days have past....after doing rooting and custom ROMs, flashing that phone back to stock to get his return.....that guy.

That guy is putting on a lawsuit claiming he is representing me, and every other G2x owner. Why does this buffoonery and lack of personal responsibility represent me. Why does this guy who says he was able to get attorneys to work for him, and for everyone in the class, which includes me, why do they have the right to claim reimbursement for attorney's fees.

How does every person dealing with T-Mobile by themselves, outside of this class, reflect the same experience as this plaintiff.

hehehehe lets launch class action, because I don't want to exchange for a different phone, or cancel my service.

makes sense? or as HTC would say, you need Sense. I never have been asserted to be in a class of victims before on a retail product....got my popcorn and everything.

And so it goes