[T-Mobile LG G2x] tombaker1:
1. You had the ablity to return the phone for 30 days, to get out of any contract. You did not do that. LG was not even involved with that contract.

2. You claim if you knew of the screen bleed, that you would have never bought the phone. That is manifestly false, because as soon as you had the phone, you became aware of it, and yet you did not get out of the contract and walk away from the phone.

3. You are smart enough to know that any software fix, is hit or miss, you understand that with all your customized ROMs. Yet for this, you become suddenlty a babe in the woods, "but they promised it would be perfect" as if any customer service person would know. Its called software because if fungible.

4. You claim that the problems started within days, however you did not ask for a replacement until after 30 days. You were waiting for what? And its only after the 30 days that you were told a update is coming. So you kept the phone without any promise of the fix. How long past the 30 days should you be given? Bought on April 11th, replacement on June 9th.

You were well aware of the defects, but did not return the phone. Now its a class action lawsuit because your really needed 45 days.

Your class action claims that every G2x is defective.....that is what you want a jury to believe. You say that LG should have know every phone was defective.

So we have to pay all the costs for a judge and jury, and costs of the backlog in the courts.....All because you could not be troubled to return a piece of electronics that did not work with your 7 emails accounts and host of apps, unique to your own usage.

I have read your entire claims, how it makes usage of the XDA forums, and quotes out posters. Your lawsuit posters repeated return phones because of some sort of screen bleed, they can only view in a room with zero lighting.

Your lawsuit has one poster claiming he won't accept a phone that is refurbished. He won't a phone that has gone through a second level of checking. He only wants one with a brand new wrapper. I guess he is one of the people who makes unboxing videos for youtube.

In your entire lawsuit you never explain how you were caused any damages, other than taking the risk of buying merchandise that you may not be perfectly satisfied with. Will you sue the maker of a radio, if it does not pick up your favorite station perfectly.

But its just a game right, you are not suing T-Mobile, you are suing LG, why? Who sold the phone, who replaced the phone for you. You did not contact LG until you no question asked return period was over. You only relied on your own beliefs about what would happen with your phone to go past the 30 days.

You knew all the problems with the phone you had, YOUR phones. But you did not return them. Now I have to pay for the court system to support you lawsuit? Did you remove all traces of your custom ROMs before returning the phone, made it look like it was never rooted?

Creative use of the XDA forums though....making posts as evidence.

This should be a slam dunk judgment on the pleadings, you don't have standing, you are not suing all parties you claim are responsible, and you have no damages beyond be a buyer who changes there mind after 30 days. You need to claim that customers are not getting units repaired or replaced, when you understand others are having that done. But wait, you never even returned the phone for a replacement, until your 30 days were gone.

Your lawyers should advise you not to respond. And for the conspiracy theory, I assure you I am just an old fashion nerd, before it was chic.

37. Plaintiff owns an LG P999 G2X phone and has experienced the defects alleged in this complaint. Plaintiff purchased an LG P999 G2X phone the day after its release, or on or about April 21, 2011.He did so, because an agent of his cellular service carrier recommended the phone to him. Within days thereafter, he experienced the power-off and screen bleeding defects. As a result, he repeatedly has had to remove the battery from, and replace it in his LG P999 G2X phone. Plaintiff’s LG P999 G2X also suffers from the screen "bleeding" defect.

38. Plaintiff experienced the power-off and screen "bleeding" problems resulting hm the defects in his LG P999 G2X phone within any and all applicable warranty periods. Plaintiff contacted his phone carrier about the shut-down issue, and, on or about June 9, 2011 received a replacement LG P999 G2X phone. Plaintiff continued to experience the same repeated shut down and screen bleeding problems with his replacement LG P999 G2X. When Plaintiff contacted LG about the defects, he was told that the company was working on an "update" for the phone that would be available at some future date, but would do nothing further to resolve this issue.

​