[T-Mobile LG G2x] tombaker1:
Beyond owning the phone and using T-Mobile I am unaffiliated in any manner, with first level or any other level I could ever think of. Beyond the complaint, and the explanations given here, I have nothing to testify to, and everything written here speaks for for itself. I am peanut gallery.

I don't see why anyone would seek to cause me damage by including me in the legal process, as both legal teams are officers of the court, and can ask all parties involved if they are associated with me, I can see no reason why the court could not fully resolve everything without me. My costs are 300 dollars an hour, billed in hourly increments only. So yanking my chain is not worthy and costly. I am open to answering question in the forums, if that helps.

No doubt about the reasons these lawyers are allowing the client to put out the case in public. I mean I own the phone, I would like to know, but if I was told, the litigant will not make any remarks about the case, except through the legal process.....heck that's it....only thing to do is wait for public records to be releases, and I ain't gonna pay for them.

I know enough that if you are a cause of your claim, that you can not ask the court for help in relief against someone. Use a phone, keep the phone, not return it, then modify the phone, return it to stock, replace the phone, then reload all your programs that Google stores along with the settings, and then say LG is not honoring the warranty, and not give them more time to remedy. Plus the Plantiffs agreements and exchanges and the warranty administrator was always T-Mobile and the Plaintiff has a duty to bring in all parties responsible for his damages.

This case is like a spaghetti strainer....it hold no water.

Remove the LCD part. Most phone never had the rebooting problem, LG represented they were working on a fix for some specific issues effecting some users setups, which was released after the lawsuit, but I think to their own employees before the lawsuit.

So you have message board posting about rebooting....but there are other people posting that the only rebooting problems they had were with custom ROMs. Which is why rooting counts so much, rooting is using the phone in an unintended manner, and voids the warranty. LG does not warranty the phone in experimental applications modify the core phone functions.

I predict judgment on the pleadings. He did not return the phone in the timeframe agreed. Unclean hands. He modified the phone. Unclean hands. He says he would not have bought the phone if he was aware of the screen, his actions do not reflect this, as he had 30 days of looking at the screen where his still accepted the phone....unclean hands.

What would have happened to the Plaintiff if he honored the return policy of the contract, and returned the phone????? An experience Android users switching to a different phone....completely unremarkable. Yet instead we have a class action lawsuit.

I am in the peanut gallery, cheap sets, I don't expect they will try the case in public, expect the standard, only remarks are made with attorney and those are heavily crafted....but wait, heck and I have been watching that new series on USA cable "SUITS"