[BetterBatteryStats] jeremysherriff:
This is looking really good, the only thing I can suggest is to remove the Facebook app and use a third-party version like FriendCaster. The wakelocks/alarms of FreindCaster are more battery friendly and more controllable.

Other than that, your only "issue" is a less-than-perfect 3g data connection. Your cell signal is marked as "good" - i'm not sure if that means "really good" or just "not bad". But, the 3g data connection is the cause of these:

Kernel Wakelocks
================
"svnet-dormancy" (): 19 m 59 s (1199 s) Cnt:(c/wc/ec)174/0/174 5.1%
"svnet" (): 8 m 19 s (499 s) Cnt:(c/wc/ec)523/0/523 2.1%
"radio-interface" (): 6 m 21 s (381 s) Cnt:(c/wc/ec)387/0/0 1.6%

You can try disabling "fast dormancy" but I suspect that once those kernel wakelocks have gone, your battery will drain faster - just a hunch based on my own experiences. The kernel wakelocks are actually a good thing (for me, anyway) as they show that the kernel processes are understanding that the connection isn't perfect, and are killing off or somehow throttling the data when connections time out. Without them, i find that the alarms and partial wakelocks become much longer and the battery life drops much much quicker. However, you should disable it and try, and put it back on if battery drain is worse. For me, overnight = 3% loss with fast dormancy on, and 15% loss with it off. You might be the opposite, it depends on your carrier and cell tower capabilities.

---------- Post added at 01:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:10 PM ----------

OK, some confusing numbers here. I see wifi running and wifi on have different numbers - so wifi sleep policies are working for you. But I see "no data connection" for the same period as the dump - does that mean you have mobile data turned off? Or something like Tasker controlling it?

You appear to have absolutely no data connections from apps (I'm ignoring the few Google framework connections) - do you really have no sync apps, no Gmail/facebook/twitter/market update notifications?

I see no opportunities to improve your battery life based on these numbers, but I'm also not seeing the usual svnet kernel wakelocks, built-in app partial wakelocks etc. You might benefit from enabling fast dormancy (or you might not, too) but I do wonder if you have agrressively tweaked lots of things so that they don't start or don't run, and you've actually managed to remove some of the background data connection controls...

---------- Post added at 01:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:20 PM ----------

What section do you see "suspend" in, in the GUI? Partial wakelocks?

Your awake time is great - 8m out of 5h. So the widgets and sync apps you have are not hurting you. I wish my apps played so nicely.

How much battery did you lose in this time? I would expect 2-4% tops. If not, you probably have a battery-hungry cell connection (LTE/4g by any chance?).

[RANT]

The only other thing I can see here is Go Launcher - I have said it before, I hate it, it destroyed my faith in smart phone battery capabilities, and it's been a repeated nightmare on every device I own. Many people love it (yes, features are great!) and many people have no battery drain as a result - however, it was the main source of drain for me on three different devices across about 12 ROM's, and not once did BBS ever show me that it was responsible for the drain. I don't know how it did it, but Go Launcher would drain my battery at a rate of 12-15% per hour. So, if you have unexplained drain, give a different launcher a try for a few days, you can always go back to Go if it makes no difference.

[/RANT] :)