yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] saifbechan:
Have this kernel a few hours running now, so far so good. No reboots or freezes.

But this release does have the deep sleep enabled I assume?? I'm asking because my battery does drain a little, a bit more than the other kernels such as angelom and mirage.

But it feels pretty stable, so I'll leave the kernel running for a while, see what happens.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] ebliss:
Use CPU Spy to check.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] JAG131990:
ok no worries.

Ninpo you crazy bastard, you just might've made it back on to my christmas list..

Running brilliantly for now 8hrs+
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] ghmail2:
omg eh, how can you make this kernel at stock speed scores 4100 in smartbench 2011:D

the scores over 4000+ usually made unter a 1.5G cpu speed

is this kernel really working under stock speed :p

just brilliant:D
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] avetny:
this is my favorite kernel !

....bookmark this thread
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Agamennon:
Kernel does not deep sleep

This kernel does NOT deep sleep, but remains @200mhz in cpu spy, i dunno if it is by design, or if not having deep sleep is going to be a problem.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] avetny:
junior member
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Agamennon:
YES! can you SENIOR MEMBER verify my junior feedback???
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] ebliss:
Mine is sleeping like a baby, snoring. Are you connected to any power source? :rolleyes:
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] 2727alex2727:
i had alot of problems before. when i tried to play flash videos the browser would restart, and i had random reboots.

after installing your 2.0.0 Release Edition

every problem ive had seems fixed, flash works great as does the quadrant score of 4000 on stock (:

hopefully the battery drain issues i've had are gone too.

thanks alot for you work.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] saifbechan:
Installed, cool app and got my answer.

@Agamennon said it has deep sleep.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Agamennon:
re-installing cpu spy and it now shows deep sleep... go figure.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] avetny:
Phone sleep well.

Maybe you drink 2 much coffee? :O

;)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] xinfinityoO:
+1

10 char ..
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] avetny:
You see....
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] silverbluem:
thanks :) didnt saw this post
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] CamoGeko:
Perhaps time to pop into specsavers... :p

Transmitted from a Galaxy far far away via XDA telepathy.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Seade:
UV-tips?

I just installed this kernel along with Cognition ROM v1.31 and I'm wondering if anyone could give me a few good tips on undervolting with SetCPU. I only go as high as 1400MHz on normal and let it go up to 1600MHz while charging. I've tried lowering all frequencies by 50mV but how low can you go without sacrificing stability? How long should a "good" stress test be performed? I'm also looking for a good cut-off temperature when it lowers the max freq. to let it cool down.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] CamoGeko:
Every CPU is different, quite a few people have already posted their best undervolting working settings and have described what their CPU can take. All you need to do is search the thread.

Also no one can really say what would perfect for you, what you have to do is try to test out different levels of undervolting for yourself. Best advice I can give you is don't lower the voltages too much at a time on different CPU frequencies.

Patience and day to day testing will provide you with the best results.

Transmitted from a Galaxy far far away via XDA telepathy.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] carlos67:
Logging option???

@Ninpo

Really like using your kernel but on the next release, please can you add a version that disables

all

the CPU logging activity (eg. Logcat, kernel debug, cpu stats etc etc) for people that don't want/need it. Maybe a flashable zip to go over the normal kernel.

I want to carry on using your kernel but don't want to be running this (in my case) unnecessary overhead. Just like we all like to delete bloatware, I also want to stop logging too as it makes for a leaner setup IMO. It can only be good for battery and also performance even if only very slightly.

Speedmod kernel has all this logging disabled (but can be enabled via ADB commands). But I want to stay here with you man.

I just wish I could turn it all off as my phone is running sweet.

Please give me (and others) the option at least.

Thanks mate. :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tolis626:
This thread is,as of now,99 pages long.People must have posted their UV in 85-90 pages of the thread.Was it too hard to search first?Jesus,going one or two pages back would have given you something!Do you know what SEARCH is?

Hell,these days I am starting to think some people don't even know what Google is!
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tolis626:
Hacre must have said like 20 times in this very thread that there is no chance in hell that he'll disable logging.You won't notice any battery or performance hit,while for him it's very useful(people with problems provide logs which help him solve the problem in case you don't know what logging is for) and it's extra work for nothing to provide a version with logging disable for the 0.01% of the users of the kernel,yourself included,that want logging disabled at all costs.But no,you still come here begging for a version without logging.It's like I see you,going to the grocer's and begging him to give you apples without stalks,just because you're an idiot and think that it'll somehow harm you.WTF?!?

I'd post-5 you without second thoughts if I were Hacre. :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] carlos67:
Man, your an absolute arse!!!! :mad:

If disabling logging is soooooo unimportant, then why has a recognized kernel developer (aka Hardcore) disabled all of it in his speedmod kernel???? Answer that one numb nuts.

Also, I asked for an OPTION to disable. That would not affect you would it???

I disable logging in windows, so why the hell not in android?

Wind your ****in neck in and stop trying your hardest to get your tongue right up Ninpo's arse.

Wanker!
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tolis626:
Did you have it or is there more?

Speedmod can do whatever wants with his kernel,it's his right to do so.I would give the same answer to someone is Speedmod's thread who asked to have logging enabled(if Speedmod had said no to it first).You had to search bofore asking for crap.Now go to mummy and cry.Tell her that bad Ninpo doesn't disable logging.Do whatever you want,I couldn't care less.

If you still want it,I'd like to see Hacre's answer.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] d3l1:
Gosh always these flaming morons ... this thread really attracts them like **** attracts flies. Can't you just keep your nonsense to yourselves and stay on topic?

I asked one question here and was instantly flamed by one of them. Whats the point?

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] carlos67:
Agreed. What's the point of a forum where you can't ask questions.

I was merely asking for an option to be included. Not for it to affect everybody.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] dh2311:
I'm gonna be checking back daily just to see it. :D But seriously, why do you actually want it disabled, it does no good and means if you find a bug you can't help solve it.

Swyped from my MIUI Galaxy S II
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] pulser_g2:
OK, come on guys... Do we need these kind of attacks? This kernel is in development (today Ninpo told me the benchmark speeds he was getting on stock speed in a version he's playing with, and it's even better than the screenshots :))

How can he help someone who cannot produce a log? I doubt you'll find any noticeable improvement by disabling the logs... If you REALLY want rid of logs, then git clone, remove the option in the config, and make -j8 :)

I don't really think you can take a kernel that is evolving, and disable logging, as it means IF you were to get a reboot, your input can't really help solve anything.

But guys, let's try and calm down a little - yes he was asking a question, but please don't start world war 2.5 in here...
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] schrickm5:
I am in agreement with tolis626, all the way on this, there seems to be a plethora of illiterates, heaving like a wave of idiocy on the shores of reason.

I am relatively new here, active since I got the S2. I can't remember the last time I asked a question. The internet is a huge and wonderful thing.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] carlos67:
@pulser_g2

OK man, I'm calm now. :) But, like I say, if disabling logging is so useless, why has Hardcore done this (and aggresively so)? He obviously see's some merit in doing it and he is hardly a novice is he? Those Speedmod users are reporting great battery life so you have to ask the question, is zero logging influencing that.

Just hate running overhead that I don't need/use. Thats all.

By all means, flame me if I deserve it. But don't if my question is reasonable and has some basis (see above ref Hardcore).

Oh, and if I disabled it and had problems, then I could simply re-enable to access logs again.

Just fed up with gimps watching this thread like hawks, desperate to flame anyone who dares ask a question. :rolleyes:
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Hacre:
The same "recognized" kernel developer that ended up having a falling out with the best Samsung Galaxy S developer (supercurio) over **** ups he made in his kernel for the SGS and refused to rectify?

If you don't want the logging that you're referring to, it's simple: don't run adb logcat. That's all that's been done in speedmod, you cannot run logcat. Logcat doesn't do anything if you don't run it. All of the debugging/logging options that would affect battery life/speed have been disabled. Logcat doesn't unless you actually run it via adb or with a tool like alogcat.

Disabling the ability to logcat is utterly moronic to be quite honest. It removes a key debugging tool for little to no benefit.

Edit: Oh and as for battery life, there's nothing wrong with Ninphatamine in that regard:
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] kwerdenker:
Really? Thats your response? Thats how you want to react in a thread of a dev, that has proven againg and again what he does with people who can't read the god damn FAQ or use the search function? With this kind of attitude you'll probably be the first person to get their custom compiled kernel from Hacre but if I were you I wouldn't flash that one in a lifetime...

(Edit: Hacre was too fast for me... and you didn't get that custom kernel, what a shame ^^)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] carlos67:
Thanks for the explanation:)

If only Tolis626 had approached the question this way with a reasoned response then that would have cut it with me.

Was just trying to participate in the thread but will have to think twice next time.

Compared to some of the silly questions asked in here, I thought my question was reasonable considering that I had provided a basis to it with arguments (ref Speedmod).

Off to watch the darts. :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Testraindrop:
Wow, respect Ninpo, I managed "only" 3+ Days with your Kernel :)

Is this the new Version Pulser was referring to?

If so, can you give us some hints what you improved? :o
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tolis626:
Is that right?

Well,I only "flamed",as you said,about the fact that you couldn't possibly use that little thing called search about something that has been answered many times already.Generally,I am a really helpful guy with understanding to those who have questions,but after some point it gets reaaaaally annoying.

If you don't like it,flash SpeedMod,no one's tied you here.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] EarlZ:
I was very active on the Galaxy S forums up until I got my Galaxy S2 last July 1, Since then I havent heard anything between Hardcore and Supercurio.. Might you share the story with us ?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tolis626:
Again:

A REASONABLE QUESTION THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN ASKED AND ANSWERED MANY TIMES SEIZES BEING REASONABLE.Is that ok with you?Consider this a lesson for the next time you'll be thinking about "participating" that way.

It's not a personal attack to you,but this whole situation really gets on my(and everyone's) nerves.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] pulser_g2:
Nope that was the version you guys have.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] jlevy73:
Interesting, did not know that. Not only is supercurio "recognized" on all 5 continents (yes, apparently polar bears enjoy voodoo sound as well) but he is one of the nicest guys you'll ever meet.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Café King:
Yeah, didn't have the patience to wait for a reply here so I just flashed it and it worked perfect :D

/CK
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] carlos67:
Man, I have read the whole thread from page one.

I know Hacre said no to disabling logging (in the OP) but I wasn't asking it to be put into the kernel for everyone. I was asking for an option only for peeps like me who like to run lean (and who understand the disadvantages of disabling logging).

I too get fed up of questions like "will this work with...." and "does this work with Tegrak....", but I think you were just looking to flame someone for the hell of it and I was the poor bugger who copped for it. :eek:

Now, let's put this to bed, OK?

btw, Hacre never did post 5 it either. That says something.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] eybee1970:
Oh men... stop behaving like kids and show the minimum of respect for each other.... its so boring.... i will stop following this hateful thread and i will just check the first 5 posts in future
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tolis626:
Ok,I'm sorry,you are(partially) right.

I never like to flame anyone,as I didn't like it when it used to happen to me.But today was something else!I must have read the most stupid things ever in my 2.5 years in the forums.I just exploded.Maybe I should,maybe I shouldn't.You aren't one to judge it,but neither am I.It'd better be someone neutral.

Anyway,it wasn't you who broke my nerves,but the guy who posted right before you,asking for the 10000th time in this thread about undervolt settings.Now,isn't that worth the flaming?

Anyway,sorry again.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tolis626:
Actually post 5 is the most worthy one! :D

Anyway,there are others,as I mentioned in my previous post to Carlos,that are very stupid and I got fed up.See what I mean and show some understanding. :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Hacre:
Nah was a test done with 2.0.2 to make sure the kernel didn't have any undue battery drains. It didn't. Apart from two kernel flashes and syncing google/facebook/twitter it sat largely idle with my JuiceDefender settings. If I lived in a better area for signal it would have been higher and if I'd done stupid **** like putting it into Airplane Mode it would have lasted even longer. It was a real world standby test.

No as I don't wish to attack Hardcore as I have no personal beef with him. I just know he did something that supercurio didn't like and knowing supercurio and his work it had to have been pretty dumb. My point wasn't to attack, it was to discourage ridiculous WELL THIS DEVELOPER SAYS THIS SO YOU SHOULD FULFIL REQUEST XYZ KTHX comments. I don't care what Hardcore does with his initramfs, it's up to him. I disagree and therefore won't be doing it. If people like the kernel but don't like the initramfs they're free to either repackage it or pull from my github and build their own.

He's a straight up legend.

Having it as some kind of toggle would require more effort than it's worth. adbd uses a few kilobytes of memory and accesses a loopback buffer if logcat is invoked, that's it. Your phone has a gig of RAM, stop trying to tune it like a Hero.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Hacre:
And there's a million of us just like me

who swear like me; who just don't give a **** like me

who put down like me; walk, talk and act like me

and just might be the next best thing but not quite me!
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] carlos67:
Yes, that IS worth the flamethrower!

OK man, peace. No hard feelings. I apologize too for some of my earlier insults towards you. :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] mach0boi:
You have a clone. Slim shady! :p
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Testraindrop:
Nice one :D Another Eminem Fan?! :D

Post 5 is quiet these days, hope for more to come^^
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tolis626:
Was that some rap/hip-hop ****?Man,I'm having second thoughts of whether I like you or not.I'm a metalhead. :p

And yes,when the moment comes that it's needed,I swear enough and don't give a ****.

And to make it your style:

I don't give a **** for those who suck

;)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Hacre:
Just run some tests on this MUST DISDABLED DA LOGGINGS nonsense.

adbd uses 3MB of RAM to sit resident.

A further 3MB of RAM is used when logcat is run, which is freed when the logcat is terminated.

The phone has 1024MB of RAM.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tolis626:
Ok,are we friends now? :p

Joking man.Thanks for undestanding.After I read that guys post my patience just went AWOL.Steam flowing through my ears.My face turned red like a Ferrari.My fist was ready to punch the first idiot that appeared in front of me.You were just unlucky to make the next post.I didn't care if you are an idiot or not,I could have insulted Chuck Norris himself if he had posted at the time you did. :p
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] veyka:
noes my megabytez
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tolis626:
Liar!ONLY 856mb are accessible by the end user!You call that enough?How dare you?! :mad:

Ok,I'm kidding. :p
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] carlos67:
....Lol, :p

I understand.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] EarlZ:
Oh noes, every megabyte is mission critical despite having 300MB++ constantly free!! give me my 3mb!
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Hacre:
Ah Glasshopper, onry the nallow minded rimit their musical tastes to a singre genle! ROR!
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] carlos67:
Hey Ninpo,

The fact that you have run some tests proves you didn't know exactly what the resource usage of logging was yourself. :p

Hell, I bet you was even curious and hence the tests. :)

btw.... Don't get the impression that I am knocking your kernel, cos I ain't.

Hell noooooo. For me it's the dogs b**locks. I'm just a tuning freak by nature.

Sorry can't help it man :o.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Nebucatnetzer:
Metalheads are open for every type of music but we stay to the best.

Greetz Nebucatnetzer
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Hacre:
I knew it was small, because we didn't turn it off on the 256MB devices like the Hero.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tolis626:
Clarifying:I prefer metal and rock to other genres.I just hate mainstream music.Eminem had some pretty cool songs(ie Lose Yourself),but after he went mainstream,I hated him.****,I even hate all these kids who hear Justin Bieber!Not to say that if I saw Justin Bieber out there I'd set fire on his balls and then shoot him with a .50cal. :p
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tolis626:
I like you.Metalheads are an endangered species these days.Unless you count Green Day fans. :p
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] pulser_g2:
Lmao was hero 256? I guess it lost most of that in reserved memory and graphics, as the figure of 180 rings a bell, along with 96 MB free straight after boot, after killing everything.

But then 3 days later on stock ROMs, it had leaked out to only 40 MB free :p

But yes point is, we have loads of free ram now on this proper phone (more than sensation too :p) So I demand my 3MB nao kthx. :p
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tolis626:
Yes,that was the Hero.Except for Chuck Norris' Hero,which had 768mb free RAM out of 256mb total.It also boasted a CPU underclocked to 844MHz to save battery. :p

Lol.I hate you Pulser.Your sig reminded me of the Chuck-Mania! :p
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] pulser_g2:
Yeah, desperate people used swap and compcache, as I remember thinking "lol, tax your cpu often?"

I hope to never reach this stage with SGS2, given same amount of RAM as in a netbook running a full desktop OS, and the fact that it will be hard to have one single app use a large chunk of it, so internal memory manager will save us :)

Though I like the sound of a hero with 300% free ram :D
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tolis626:
Aha,me too.But it's only a dream.I fiddled with my old Hero the other day(I have sold it to a friend who messed something up and I had to fix it) and GOD,it was slow.Gingerbread almost cripples it,free ram is never above 80mb and when compared to the GS2 it feels like something is awefully wrong.I surely don't want to mess with my Diamond again or I'll kill myself in the name of free ram and the alliance of functional devices! :p
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] veyka:
Almost luxurious, on the hermes an old wm phone, we where lucky to have 5meg free on boot :o 64meg ram and 64meg rom, funfun.

And even the bb 9300, most common sight, "we are closing this webpage as its to big to load"
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] avetny:
I hope my friend Hacre gonna do BLN support in next build.

because we already got first kernel with BLN !

Kernel Thunderbolt 14 By Angelom BLN + CIFS.

http://api.viglink.com/api/click?format=go&drKey=1359&loc=http%3A%2F%2Fxdaforums.com%2Fshowthread.php%3Ft%3D1162715&v=1&libid=1312166602084&out=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.multiupload.com%2F4UVKNX6TI6&ref=http%3A%2F%2Fxdaforums.com%2Fforumdisplay.php%3Ff%3D1058&title=%5BROM%5D%5BKG3%5D%20Batista70%203.2%20Based%202.3.4%2026-07-2011%20%2B%2B%2B%20NEW%20Kernel%2014%20BLN%2B%2B%2B%20-%20xda-developers&txt=Download
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] pulser_g2:
Perhaps you should be looking at what is on git for this kernel :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] netcitizen:
Will this kernel go well with the new KG6 base ROM?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] pulser_g2:
Yes it will be fine
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] netcitizen:
okay cool.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] netcitizen:
Not sure if I can ask this here. anyways.

installed the KG6 base ROM and now flashed ninpo's kernel.

In this ROM i feel the vibration intensity of the haptic feedback is less.

Even before installing the kernel it was the same.

But when I go into Settings>sound>vibration intensity the max value of that menu has pretty strong vibration.But that does not happen when i used the back button or the keyboard.its like only 60%.

Any idea why ?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] pulser_g2:
Sounds like an issue in the Samsung ROM, if as you say, it was same before flashing kernel.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] netcitizen:
hmm okay.

Let me see if users post the same when the VR,Cognition KG6 ROMs are out.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] EarlZ:
I've gotten in touch with HC and Supercurio and asked them about the issue, both of them told me that they dont have the slightest clue on what your talking about :confused:
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] noaru:
Cifs support not implemented..

Great Kernel i must say, but there is something wrong or i just dont do it as i should.

There should be a CIFS support from Ninphetamine 2.0.1. version on..but i tested it with Cifsmanager and there is no support.

I tried it also with Other Kernels that have it, and it works fine.

Specs: Galaxy S 2, Rooted, KG3..

Ok nevermind..found the solution...
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] dyallo:
So do I! :D