yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] TechSilver13:
I am not using 1.6ghz but I am getting fantastic battery life with this kernal...I have used Speedmod, RAGE, Speedfrey, and stock...I am using setCPU 500mhz-1200mhz ondemand and 200mhz on calls and screen off. Here is a screenshot of my 1600mhz though.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] eiraku:
VillainRom 2.0, Ninpo 2.1.3, bootanims working fine.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] idmas:
Ya me too bro ...loving this kernel
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Hacre:
Alright, people with the bootanimation problem can bloody well wait until I get back, it's not the end of the world.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tbong777:
NO its not ROM related. I actually reflashed the kast three versions of Niiniphetimine and the BA showed up. Until the lastest version. Not that big a deal except for any other issues that may have cropped up unknown as of yet affected by that.

IM running Cog and since DG apparently had something to do with the latest update I have to believe the issue is in there somewhere. It will get at least looked at since more than a few are having this minor issue
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Hacre:
Yes because I said the problem doesn't exist didn't I...yep, that's what I said. I wasn't responding to someone demanding it be fixed and a release made immediately, no sir.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] mickliq:
Battery life is sick on 2.1.3 if it's in standby - I'm guessing there's some incredible "deep sleep" when the screen is off that I haven't seen in other Kernels before.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] eatonjb:
take a breather and step back a little. YES it is kinda annoying. I wish there was one, but I can live without it. I like it cause now I just get black screen, and that cuases a little panic in the back of my head (being the impatient one at times)

I will live with it, it will not kill me.,. but I would like it back.

some things are more then just ascetic, like my case, I like to know something is happening!
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] chrisjcks:
How do you even know its kernel related...

Bet youve messed with either different boot animations/sounds or themes...

I cant see how it can work fine on someone elses phone if its kernel related.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Illicit Hero:
Thanks Hacre, and have fun!
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] AndroidGX:
Whaaaat? ^^

Getting my best score here on 2.1.3.

2% battery using with 6 hours of deep sleep with sync+wifi on this night !

Even George Clooney would say : "What else ?" :D
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] eatonjb:
iv never messed with Bootscreens in my life.. I never turn my phone on or off unless im rebooting it putting a new rom in, so its trivial.. black screen suckss tho. it did a theme and it was fine, did the kernel , and poof.. ohh well.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] chrisjcks:
So, how do you know the theme wasnt at fault?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] TechSilver13:
i have my phone at 200mhz with screen off and was at 100% after 8 hours of sleep...no wifi though or gps (turn it off when I go to bed). extremely impressed. By far the best kernel IMO!
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] eatonjb:
it stopped after I installed the kernel..

it could have been the theme reacting to the kernel, but still either way, its gone.

anyways enough with the debate, a few people claim they have an issue, it could be a small one, but its still an issue, and if its never resolvd, so be it, but it would be nice if it was.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] designgears:
@Ninpo,

Found a fix for the adb install issues.

The rom devs will have to do this;

/system/bin/am

/system/bin/pm

/system/bin/svc

/system/bin/ime

/system/bin/bmgr

/system/bin/input

/system/bin/monkey

Edit each one and add "#!/system/bin/sh" (without the quotes), to the top of each file.

<@Ninpo> designgears: um, old news

Guess I am late to the party :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] bgn9000:
Since I moved to your kernel, I stop using 1200 Mhz frequency because 1000 is enough.

I am using conservative governor when screen is off, so my sgs2 is most of time in deep sleep.

Big job ;)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] chiggah:
Will ninpo 2.1.3 run fine with KH3 modem and VillainROM 2.4.2 ??
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] joelteixeira:
I've been reading the last updated pages but didn't find a reason why Batista rom downgraded the kernel used from 2.1.3 to 2.1.2. Anyone experiencing problems with 2.1.3?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] KennyLegend:
Anyone experiencing their phone getting hot on the latest version 2.1.3?

Mine gets seriously hot with internet use and also while charging. It didn't on 2.0.5.

Power amp wont play now either. Very strange ....
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] SolBallads:
Meanwhile in St.Leomar's thread:

And there is an Answer!

No further comments..
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] jlevy73:
LMAO. You can't pay for that kind of humor
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] runedrune:
Yes.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] BrandoHD:
Mostly a boot animation issue, maybe u should asked rom Dev why they downgraded.

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] ka2uki:
good kernel.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] bgn9000:
No such issue. I am using ninphetamine 2. 1. 3 and KG5 modem.

KH3 modem has battery drain issues with WiFi.

so far so good even here in saigon with a temperature of 35 C ;)

Edit: power amp is running well...
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] KennyLegend:
Really?? Where did u hear this? I didn't have wifi drain on kh3
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Foggie:
Hi

I was just wondering if this kernel supported device encryption that is applied via Exchange security policies?

Thanks
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] bgn9000:
This is good for you...

By the way, I think that usually WiFi issues come from modem rather than kernel.

So, my answer was: try another modem.

Anyway, compared to KG5, this version consumes a bit more even we keep phone in deep sleep.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] hEEGy:
I think that WiFi issues are kernel related, they got nothing to do with the modem.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] bgn9000:
Well, I am interested by some hints about this.

However, of course kernel is in charge of data exchange but modem is the firmware in charge of telephone resources.

Anyway, it should be interesting to compare with 2.0.2 and kg5 modem versions.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] goldbergx:
Yep, this kernel doesn't work well for liverpool fans :p

Jokes apart, internet use and PowerAmp work as good as earlier on 2.13 (I switched from 2.0.5 too, so just saying)

(Man United fan here just in case you were wondering where to point the guns at ;) )
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] KennyLegend:
Liverpool fan?? I don't even follow footie mate... :) :):)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] more2come:
After some intense testing over the last 4 days, the current Ninpo kernel 2.1.3 performs best regarding battery life.

I'm on Exynos 5.2 KH3 ROM and I tested nearly all popular kernels on this board.

Not just the best flashing message in CWM recovery (look for yourselves ;) ), but also best overall performance! Thanks hacre!
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] goldbergx:
Ah the name "KennyLegend" is misleading :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] KennyLegend:
Hehe :)

......
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Rem¡:
Does 2.1.3 work with KG2 (stock, vodafone branded) firmware? I currently have 2.0.5 and that one runs fine.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Testraindrop:
:rolleyes:
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] eatonjb:
I'm starting to think that wifi issues and battery drain has more to do writhe the AP/router. Done routers seem to be more drain then others. I have no way to test this, but wifi seems to drain faster then 3/4g
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Rem¡:
I know, but this is a XXKG5 kernel, so i am not sure if it will work with KG2 firmware.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Hannibal226:
Greatest Rom for performance, but PLS improve battery live (was a lot better in 4 or 5 versions ago...

Thx anyway for ya work ;)

CHEERS!
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] hussam1988:
thanks for that info

thanks dev for the kernel

using KH1 2.3.3 ROM
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] hussam1988:
you mean 2.0.2 :D
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] eatonjb:
2.1.3 seems to work pretty well for me.. 2.0.2.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Hannibal226:
not sure if 2.0.1 or 2.0.2 ... but in this circle...

So maybe he added or deleted something which drains the battery a lot more...

Hope he can fix it, because then it's the best kernel!
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] beda_boy:
just checking if there's already a fix for the bootanimation on 2.1.3:D
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] s2d4:
It is not a Rom!!!
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] BrandoHD:
Hacre has gone on his honeymoon, as said a few posts back, any updates to the kernel would be posted on the OP as have been the case with all others.....
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Hannibal226:
WTF :D

Sure I know, didn't recognized that I wrote "Rom"... surely i meant KERNEL..

Sorry :D

EDIT: Went back to 2.0.4, maybe it has a better battery drain compared to actual one.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] AvRS:
I bet it's not kernel related as this kernel and Villain Rom 2.4.2 has great battery life. Have you had the exact same set-up for every version of the kernel you've used? You've probably got rogue apps keeping the phone awake and thus draining your battery. There's plenty of reading to be done about this so if you have a read in this thread and numerous others you'll find things you can do as it's been covered many times, it's good to read.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] CaspaTheGhost:
Ahh mate, it's too much for me! Haha... Those kinda posts just keep me coming back for more!

On another note... I'm seriously contemplating installing this kernel on my BB9900! Off the charger at 6:30am this morning and it's just died on me, WTF?!? Welcome to the world of touch screens and 'always on' connections RIM!

Wishing Hacre and his missus the time of their lives on honeymoon, dont worry, we'll keep the thread warm for ya!

;)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Hannibal226:
Hey,

yeah everytime same settings in set-cpu.

Also no other apps can be drain because i think all apps the same and also with same data (from titanium after flashing new versions of roms)...

So I'm sure its the Kernel but I'll see it today when I'm on 2.0.4 ...

Ty anyway for reply ;)

PS: except sync of emails and gps nothing turned on and also the same like on older versions...

CHEERS!

EDIT: I read on an other Kerne-thread [don't matter which] that say had in last updates no "deep sleep", which means higher battery drain.

I'm not sure how to check but maybe this is one point here, too, for higher draining.

So pls check this...
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] manouvras:
is this kernel running at 1600 mhz cause...the speed at programs is 1200...but the bogoMips says 1592.52 and my battery ends very quicly....
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] zamana:
I realized that with setCPU my phone NEVER goes into Deep Sleep. But without setCPU, it does.

The scenario is always the same, with whatever kernel.

I would like to know if it's only me or anyone else is experiencing the same behavior.

Regards.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] shohid1234:
Any chance of incorporating a 2g/3g toggle switch into the kernel? I know some builds of CM do it.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] k1000716:
I'm running 2.1.3, have set cpu installed and am definitely getting deep sleep, about 3 hours so far today.

Data or 2g/3g toggles are a rom feature, not kernel.

Sent from my happy place.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] rmourar:
I have deep sleep with the latest version of the kernel...

If you want to check if you have it too you can use cpu spy from the market...
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Arkanius:
Hacre, I have a request that probably other Car Dock users have

Is it possible to route phone calls sound through aux/line in when docked with the Car Dock/Desk Dock?

The official behavior is for the phone to enter in Speaker mode and when removing the Speaker mode, the audio is not routed (Every other sound is)

Basically what I'm asking is to route every sound, including Calls, to the aux, as if using the 3.5 jack.

Is it possible? I've asked xcaliburinhand (Creator of the Galaxy S Dock Redirector patches) and he said it's not possible via App. Only through kernel manipulation
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] veyka:
Old thread old kernel, disregard, use cpu spy to see if your phone is hitting deep sleep, and if its not use betterbatterystats (see my sig) to find out what the problem is. Generally most battery issues are rom/app issues not kernel.

RTFP *CAN* be overclocked to 1.6ghz IF you use the correct app, try reading the first few posts next time.

Battery issues = most of the time app/rom issues, see my reply a few lines up.

Pleases learn the difference between a kernel and a rom before you hit the reply button again, if not just log out of XDA, shut down your computer and go fall down a hole.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] zamana:
I use CPU Spy to check deep sleep too. Thanks.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] zamana:
Thanks for reply.

Would you mind to share your SetCPU settings here?

Thanks.

Regards.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] k1000716:
My most recent (and very stable) undervolting was 75mv under on all settings (200-1200) and underclocked to 800 works fine. I can run on 100mv or more under, but start to get some app instabilities. I'm currently running standard settings as I've got no battery issues at all (see signature).

This thread, and forum, has uncountable requests for the same information, please search before asking. Nobody minds helping if you ask questions, unless it's been covered many times before. And this has. Always read a few pages back, if you don't find anything read a few more pages, then search, then ask.

Read, search, ask. Then people are reasonably happy to help.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] BrandoHD:
Just a small reminder :D
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] k1000716:
I posted my settings in my initial reply...
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] SolBallads:
Is there anything left to say? I don't think so.. The perfect answer.. Right to the point without any sarcasm :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] neilbantoc:
This post is JUST SO ****ING HILARIOUS. Never have I seen a dev that's this funny. Props to you and your amusing rants.

edit: removed quote.. refer to OP..
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] BrandoHD:
And he did practically post his settings in the initial reply, but some people seem to want an excel sheet or a table outlining all voltages on one side and the freq on the other, and all this is happening when the OP has made a kind enough request that this type of posting be kept to minimum, if I remember correctly, and i believe I do, a Moderator even stepped in to reiterate the request of the OP:confused:

So how about we guys use the other forum tools that are available to us in order to keep this thread more about the kernel and kernel issues as their are many threads on OC/UV and we also have the "PM" tool.....:cool:
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] eatonjb:
you really had the quote this? really? not a single part of your post helped anyone in any way!
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] more2come:
Well, I dedicated a whole week to kernel testing and this is what I found out so far:

Test platform is my SGS II with Exynos 5.2 KH3 ROM, KH3 Modem as well.

I tested all new custom kernels, ninphetamine 2.1.3 performed best in terms of smoothness and battery drain. I already mentioned that earlier.

Then I picked some older versions of ninphetamine, somewhere between 2.0.0 and 2.1.3 .

It seems that all the newer versions drain the battery faster than the older ones, ninphetamine 2.0.1 shows far less draining compared to 2.1.3 !

Anything wrong with Samsung's newer sources?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] SERGI.3210:
one question... this kernel overclocks both cores?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] kalpik:
O_o

/10char
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] pulser_g2:
Uhm... Yes it does.

You can verify by using a CPU frequency monitor.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Arkanius:
Has this been investigated?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] chrisjcks:
The kernel doesnt overclock anything.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] SERGI.3210:
probably my english it´´s not better and more rich like yours

is a manner of speaking I think u understood me well:rolleyes:

This kernel

allows

to overclock both cores????
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] BrandoHD:
Hacre is on honeymoon, so u might not get an answer till he gets back, unless netarchy decides to have a look
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] rumthin:
I experience the same thing.

I've tried a handful of the newer ROMs and kernels based on KH3 and I get much worse battery drain.

I've reverted back to VR 2.3 and ninpo 2.0.2 and my battery life is much better.

I've kept everything as consistent as I can [ie. I install all the same apps across different ROMs and kernels via titanium and keep the same widgets], but it's always the same result.

I've messed around with different modems, but I don't really see much of a difference changing, so I'm currently running KH3.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] CaspaTheGhost:
Yep, Hacre is eating rare steaks and drinking cheap 2 euro beer... Oh how I envy him... Damn you work!
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] DarkMenTH:
I can't help reading the HDD with ntfs file system..any solution?fuse.ko and ntfs-3g.ko not work with this kernel?:(
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] inkyadrian:
I am running 2.0.5. In your opinion, does it use more power than 2.0.1?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] 89luca89:
Hi all!

Simple question to all of you:

The kernel have the possibility to change voltage of cpu...

Now I want to change them via script and NOT via SetCpu, Voltage control or ANY Overclock app...

Is there a way to use a script interface cause I read the thread but i've not found anything related!

Thx to anyone will help me!
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tshoulihane:
Almost certainly through sysfs - otherwise how would setcpu be able to work with all the different phones? I'm too lazy to check for you though.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] 89luca89:
I thinks also, but from what I see, there is no VDD to change the voltages "on the fly" with a script...

The only refer I see to voltage is a file UV_mV_table

If I change any values here, it becomes "1" and in next reboot it will beface the default:

Example:

Default is

1600mhz: 1425 mV

If I use echo, cat or sed, to change it it becomes

1600mhz: 1 mV

And will stay this until next reboot after reboot it returns to default...

so its not the right file to modify (altoght modified by set cpu when changed voltage....)

So Anyone will try to help me finding out a solution? (if there is)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tshoulihane:
Sounds about right. Check the source, but I think this is the mechanism to update the table which the kernel holds. Since clock frequency is changing dynamically, the volts need to be dynamic too. CLK_UP is something like set new volts, wait for volts, set new freq. Remember it isn't a file that you are editing, just an interface to the kernel.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] mellll:
I love this kernel!!!!

It saves battery like crazy, 100% charged at 1am bedtime, and 99% at 8am when I woke up, off the charger, just incredible.

Yeah its in deep sleep, but I used to get drops of 18% - 25% over night on stock.

Best kernel around.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] JAG131990:
I experience the exact same thing. I reverted back to 2.0.2 as well shortly after every release since!
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] AvRS:
I did my own test with VR2.4.2 and 2.1.3 which I updated to on Monday afternoon from 2.1.0. After a day and a half I experienced much higher drain, circa 40% worse with similar usage and no other changes to apps by the end of the day. Was having similar drain for the first half of today so reverted back to 2.1.0 and had no drop for 2 hours of idle which matches the performance I was getting pre upgrade. Will be staying on 2.1.0 for now as I don't really get any benefit from the minor changes made anyway. Have found every version from 2.1.0 and previous to offer me (in my opinion only) similar levels of performance and battery life.

Obviously I'll still continue to test any new versions released as is still the best kernel and ROM combo available :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] bamthwok:
Can someone confirm that Android 2.3.4 can mount NTFS flash drives? Theoratically it should, since the kernel support fuse.ko.

But I can't get it to work. Anyone can mount NTFS drives with Android 2.3.4. and v latest Ninphetamine 2.1.3?

Any help is highly appreciated.

Cheers,

bamthwok
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] scorpion667:
Could I use Ninphetamine 2.0.2 with KH3 modem and KH3 Rom? That version is my favorite =)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Tijmen:
:rolleyes:
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tallica55:
For me, it doesn't work with this kernel. I also tried some others, only got it working with CF-Root Kernel.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] kalpik:
Oh alright you have my permission to use 2.0.2 with KH3 modem and ROM.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] SolBallads:
Trolololololol!! XD
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] zamana:
I'm using this setup right now with no problems at all.

Without SetCPU and JuiceDefender, 5% drop in 6 hours at night, WiFi off, 3g ON, with a high percentage of Deep Sleep.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] goldbergx:
Do you update your signature after every flame war? ;)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] zamana:
Please, go SEARCH about my signatures changes before posting questions about this topic here, ok?

:D
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] AvRS:
OT: I wish there were size restrictions on signatures to stop huge annoying signatures wasting screen space, especially when they contain pointless, irrelavant speeches!

Sorry just needed to get that off my chest
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] KennyLegend:
.........

+1
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] zamana:
I agree with you. In other words, we need more respect with each other, right?

--

Signature supressed intentionally.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Nebucatnetzer:
Just use the XDA App then you can't see the signature, different font sizes etc. And it's easier to use forum but that's just my opinion.

Greetz Nebucatnetzer
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] KennyLegend:
You can see the sig now on xda app . Only difference is it looks like part of the post.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Nebucatnetzer:
Depends which part you mean. For example all this stuff with the phone histories or the links from Gecko for modems never appear here in my app but that's ot.

Greetz Nebucatnetzer
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] KennyLegend:
You are right.