yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Xperia Arc Android Development] harfot:
Yes, right.

But because I could not get it working after flashing new kernel at which time I was disturbed and forgot everything about the dalvik :confused:

So trying to figure it out I flashed back to baseband 64 and as that also did not worked then at last I began thinking of the right solution, I forgot to wipe the dalvik :p

So thats why I just now tries it with baseband 64 :)
[Xperia Arc Android Development] DooMLoRD:
hey Iris the v17 has the intermediate frequencies added too (364Mhz-764Mhz) and some more...

if u already had v15 or above then u dont need need to flash modules every time...

i havent pushed my latest sources yet but u will get all voltage related info here:

https://github.com/DooMLoRD/Xperia-...ter/kernel/arch/arm/mach-msm/acpuclock-7x30.c
[Xperia Arc Android Development] zangetsu2188:
Thanks doom!

Already flashed your v17 kernel.

Have some coffee or beer.

I've sent some.

Really grateful for your very useful kernel. :)

Thanks for the hard work.

Confirmation number: 5B531391LS8163125
[Xperia Arc Android Development] le_manhpro:
Hi DooMLoRD !

I have a problem:mad: is when I flast v17 (2.0GHz) to the arc s, buid 42, then I have overclocked maxximum, I have seen in the set cpu 133 min rather than 122, then restart the phone constantly, pls help me, sorry my english is not good:eek:
[Xperia Arc Android Development] harfot:
Have you wiped the dalvik casche?
[Xperia Arc Android Development] Flo95:
Try lower overclock
[Xperia Arc Android Development] le_manhpro:
I can't wipe davil casche:confused:, and if so low my 1.9GHz phone to meet any obstacle, but why in the V15, I have overclocked 2.0GHz, it is normal sorry my english is not good:eek:
[Xperia Arc Android Development] taaviu:
Seriously ....you don't need so grazy overclock.

You brick something...

Why you can't wipe dalvik cashed?

Sent via MIUI 2.1.13
[Xperia Arc Android Development] iridaki:
Perhaps you strained your processor with the 2 GHz overclock for a prolonged period of time and now it can't take it anymore.

I've seen too many people wondering "My phone used to work at xGHz why not anymore"... Guys, just because it worked at some point, it doesn't mean it will always work. Prolonged use of high frequencies can and probably will damage your phone. Deal with it. ;) Cheers!

iR¡D@k!* via Tapatalk
[Xperia Arc Android Development] le_manhpro:
ever I still like DooM installation instructions and did not see him wipe davik casche request:confused:, I will try to reinstall and do as you instruct, sorry my bad english

oh no, first I just only to the 1.7 ghz, and I just pushed to 2.0GHz, in a time not long ago when just installed the new version if available, the V15 is the case no matter what, but there are problems with v17, hixx sr my english is not good
[Xperia Arc Android Development] lamducthien:
u can flash v17 with 1.6 ghz version then u should set cpu max at 1.4ghz, I think 1.4ghz is the best for all, after that u can flash v17 with 2.0ghz version then set 1.4ghz. Dont set max cpu is 2.0ghz, it make ur phone bootlop
[Xperia Arc Android Development] cx-11:
V17

First thanks for teh fast an good work doom ................

then i registred some bootlops with V17 on 134 to 1,6 with interactiveX and noop on ARCS

i try diff settings now

an stop More tests about the V16 kernel......
[Xperia Arc Android Development] DooMLoRD:
increase the minimum cpu freq to ~250Mhz
[Xperia Arc Android Development] tRippinthehead:
hey why 460Mhz have 850mV by default and this lower that others :)

for notice on test 6 UV -100 worked stable but now it causes phone reboot.
[Xperia Arc Android Development] cx-11:
THX i Will try now reporting others...........:-)

---------- Post added at 01:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:23 PM ----------

i find the problem sorry im not see before when im disconnecting the USB cable from laptop for switching some files the phone get in reboot byself

....................hmmmmm
[Xperia Arc Android Development] tRippinthehead:
Hey Doom, i think 460 and 1017 Mhz have wrong voltage by default! and maybe 1.5 and 1.6 have too low voltage, no? :confused: cuz I tried to OC my phone up to 1.6 and it cause reboot with default voltage.

Tried play game with all default voltage on 1.4Ghz and still getting reboot :(
[Xperia Arc Android Development] pwntigo:
Any chance geting an update to the CM7 version?
[Xperia Arc Android Development] DooMLoRD:
I yet have to merge latest changes from FXP repo for my CM kernel... so it will take some time... so will MiUi version....

Weird I just checked on my arc and all voltages are correct

May be u have some init.d script/app which is interfering
[Xperia Arc Android Development] tRippinthehead:
lolz my fault :P sorry and thx

going to test now
[Xperia Arc Android Development] Finalfour:
How can I set -100 voltage in set cpu? I can't find voltage tab is SetCpu...
[Xperia Arc Android Development] Kuroyukii:
Guys ? I need some help.

Today I wanted to flash the v17 Kernel but I'm stucking in bootloop.

I've already tried to flash to .42 and Baseband -36(incl. Patch).

I wiped Dalvik and the normal cache, factory reset.

I hope someone can help me with this issue because I have to use Doomlord kernel (0% Battery issue)

My Phone is an Arc btw.
[Xperia Arc Android Development] doomed151:
Something's weird. Currently I'm on my own ROM (arconium 5.6 / 4.0.2.A.0.62). When testing v16-test6 (and all previous versions), all is well but with v17 (249 Min / 1401 Max / smartassV2) it bootloops gets stuck and reboots very easily especially when playing a graphics intensive game or connected to mass storage. Baseband is 36 with the patch and voltages are stock.

I'll do some more testing and report my findings.
[Xperia Arc Android Development] tRippinthehead:
same issues here...

I think it is voltage related need to play with it for each phone.
[Xperia Arc Android Development] Kuroyukii:
@doomed, are you able to boot in the OS? I mean even one time with the v17 Kernel
[Xperia Arc Android Development] doomed151:
Yes. It does do random reboots though.
[Xperia Arc Android Development] Flo95:
Mine is up for 18h on V17 and no reboot or something like that on Arconium 5.6 lagfix1

134-1401

Undervolted -75mV (most speeds) up to -175mV
[Xperia Arc Android Development] Kuroyukii:
Can you maybe tell me what u did?

For some reasons it doesn't even boot for me o;
[Xperia Arc Android Development] Duvel999:
back to 6016, fw .62 / baseband .64 (patched libs)

V17 isn't my thing;)
[Xperia Arc Android Development] DooMLoRD:
hmmm i had suspected something like this might happen...

keep testing and let me know which governors give u problems...

i use Scary governor on my ARC and it doesnt have this issue...

hmmm i think i will revert the changes in the governors...
[Xperia Arc Android Development] tRippinthehead:
got random reboots with smartassV2 governor with OC up to 1.4GHz :C
[Xperia Arc Android Development] DooMLoRD:
one second i am getting the list of the governors i changed...
[Xperia Arc Android Development] Flo95:
Will that also bring back the old cpu freq table?

I liked 122 and 1024 MHZ more when you look at the frequencies :D

Like when they appear on the SetCPU widget
[Xperia Arc Android Development] DooMLoRD:
no i think this new cpufreq table is more stable as it uses the correct base clock 19.2MHz and correct integral multipliers

ok so i am posting a FIX version of v17 which will have older (pre v17) governors...
[Xperia Arc Android Development] number08:
wifi fix for v17 please
[Xperia Arc Android Development] DooMLoRD:
wifi is working fine...

flash the modules provided in first post!

@ALL

ok so i am posting a FIX version of v17 which will have older (pre v17) governors...
[Xperia Arc Android Development] Tigrer:
I got two random reboots from morning and noticeable more battery eating than v6016 with the same settings as below

249/1GHz ondemand deadline
[Xperia Arc Android Development] Finalfour:
All working fine, in 3 hours only one percent dropped :) I did't use the phone, actually. Baseband 36, acronium 5.6. Wifi works fine, no restarts. But, can you explain, how i can undervolt my phone with setcpu? O maybe i should use other software for that? I can't find voltage tab in set cpu...
[Xperia Arc Android Development] Tigrer:
IncrediControl from market :)
[Xperia Arc Android Development] DooMLoRD:
well nothing much has changed w.r.t. to those parameters...

which baseband & FW/ROM did u test on?

voltage control via SETCPU is not supported...

use the apps mentioned in first post or u can use small init.d script to set voltages
[Xperia Arc Android Development] Finalfour:
Which voltage are you using on various freq?
[Xperia Arc Android Development] faisaldante:
is it the same problem on the xperia play will you update that to
[Xperia Arc Android Development] DooMLoRD:
i use -75mV or -100mV... luckily my ARC can handle those low voltages... not all devices can handle under/overvolting...

which "same problem"???
[Xperia Arc Android Development] Finalfour:
Is it dangerous to undervolting? What can happend?
[Xperia Arc Android Development] DooMLoRD:
no not really...

worse that can happen is the CPU will just crash (not harmful) and device will power off/random reboot...
[Xperia Arc Android Development] Tigrer:
Fasty1 .62 baseband 36 with proper libs, as described in post http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=21360624&postcount=1917

Maybe it's something wrong with any app, i will investigate ;)
[Xperia Arc Android Development] faisaldante:
battery drain and that you gonna update xperia play kernel an all
[Xperia Arc Android Development] LenAsh:
no not really...

worse that can happen is the CPU will just crash (not harmful) and device will power off/random reboot...

Err... if the CPU is in the midst of a write operation to local Flash, and the undervolting causes the CPU to incorrectly address the memory, or place incorrect data on the A/D bus, or enable the wrong chipselect line, then havoc can ensue. What we call an "indeterminate state" in the datasheets.

The situation is normally recoverable with a reflash, but not always. This is how hardware can become damaged by having data bus locks or crashes, or where a bus race condition occurs.

Upshot is that undervolting is not a recipe for data integrity.
[Xperia Arc Android Development] DooMLoRD:
are u referring to "local flash" as the usual use of device OR the flashmode in which we flash firmware/baseband onto device?

ya i was going to update kernel for play today but then this issue of governors misbehaving came up... so fixing that first....
[Xperia Arc Android Development] Flo95:
Undervolt gets applied after boot, flashing can't harm it then because no uv in recovery or flashmode ;)
[Xperia Arc Android Development] DooMLoRD:
DooMKernel v17-FIX2 released!

DooMKernel v17-FIX2 released!

[ tips / recommendations ]

for optimal results it is HIGHLY recommended to use -36 baseband with corresponding libs... the baseband files and libs can be found here:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1382657

(thank you Iris!)

for better battery life try undervolting... start off in steps of -25mV and see which is stable for u... for my ARC -100mV was stable...

before u report any battery drain issues please read this:

[GUIDE] HOW-TO Properly Evaluate Battery Life and Provide Useful Reports

[ changelog ]

most changes similar to v17 kernel

REVERTED to stock voltages (till 1.4Ghz freq) - hopefully this should resolve random reboots faced by some users

REVERTED all governors to pre v17 - hopefully this should solve the governors misbehaving

for ur reference this is the current voltage table in use:

download links at first post!!!

enjoy!
[Xperia Arc Android Development] LenAsh:
You misunderstand, I'm not talking about the act of flashing, I'm talking about normal operation. Operating the CPU outside of its normal Vdd min levels could lead to malfunction, which may go beyond the nuisance of reboots.

As I stated, you take the phone's stability and longevity in your own hands and you cannot ensure that a temporary or permanent malfunction will not occur due to this.

Perhaps you might consider the many "mystery" bricks (or partial hardware failures) that happen to phones...

Either way, you should consider advising anyone doing this that there is a risk, however small you personally consider this to be.
[Xperia Arc Android Development] DooMLoRD:
hehe... then any "random reboot" will result in the same thing...

anyways i have kept stock voltages in my kernel (for frequencies upto 1.0/1.4GHz)... if u want u can undervolt...
[Xperia Arc Android Development] LenAsh:
That is correct.
[Xperia Arc Android Development] Ninolina:
I didn't have any issues with previous version v17...:) Not a single reboot or similar problem..:) But I flashed V17 FIX and I will test it too...:)
[Xperia Arc Android Development] Flo95:
Same here

But anyways, I'm on V17-FIX now :)

Thanks once again for your hard, good and fast dev work

Your awesome :)

Would donate when I'd be old enough to have a Paypal acount.

Btw, the voltage table you posted is undervolted, did you mean "in use" or "I use"?
[Xperia Arc Android Development] DooMLoRD:
good eye!

crap i mixed up the files... i had pushed this table to our FXP CM kernel, which is undervolted by default... must have got mixed in the folder mess :P

thanks i will remove the files and compile again...

btw for anyones reference the stock frequency-voltage table is as follows:

https://github.com/DooMLoRD/Xperia-...ernel/arch/arm/mach-msm/acpuclock-7x30.c#L110
[Xperia Arc Android Development] Flo95:
That might be the reason why some noticed reboots I guess.

Will flash the new version, too.

Even if I have my voltages due IncrediControl.
[Xperia Arc Android Development] DooMLoRD:
yups u r right... that slight undervolting might be causing problems on some devices...

anyways i am compiling new kernel now...

will post them when they are ready...

sorry guys!
[Xperia Arc Android Development] DooMLoRD:
done uploaded kernels with stock voltage table (till 1.4Ghz) as FIX2

detailed changelog:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=21480643#post21480643
[Xperia Arc Android Development] Flo95:
Thanks

My Arc boots up atm

And btw, V17-FIX worked fine untill I shut it down to install FIX2
[Xperia Arc Android Development] iridaki:
Thank you Doom, I flashed V17 fix 2.

Was away from home last few days, so didn't try V17 earlier versions.

I like Scary governor a lot, seems snappy, yet doesn't jump to high frequencies unless necessary.

This is the new sample script for undervolting:

#!/system/bin/sh
echo 134400 [I]750[/I] > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 184320 [I]775[/I] > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 192000 [I]800[/I] > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 249600 [I]825[/I] > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 364800 [I]825[/I] > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 460800 [I]850[/I] > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 576000 [I]875[/I] > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 652800 [I]875[/I] > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 768000 [I]900[/I] > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 806400 [I]900[/I] > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 921600 [I]925[/I] > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 1017600 [I]950[/I] > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 1113600 [I]975[/I] > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 1209600 [I]1000[/I] > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 1305600 [I]1100[/I] > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 1401600 [I]1150[/I] > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 1516800 [I]1200[/I] > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 1612800 [I]1200[/I] > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels

Numbers in italics are the values that I use, NOT THE DEFAULT ones.

They are rather strict, my phone can handle them, but that may not be the case for other devices.

Also, on that note, since it came up earlier, I am a big fan of undervolting...

I undervolted my X10 as soon as this was made possible by custom kernels and the worst case scenario has always been a reboot (or the infamous X10 WLOD). Other than that, when I got the right values, the device was functioning fine, temperatures were varying at lower levels and battery life was improved.

My X10 is now 2 years old and still going strong! :D So, undervolt is safe in my book. :)

Cheers!
[Xperia Arc Android Development] cx-11:
Doom you not just domm you remember me an the comic FLASH hahhaa superflashdooom

thx alot for your great and hard work thx all day wehn i get my arc

you the man man

Thank you it runns well now ..............verry
[Xperia Arc Android Development] ShyamSasi:
Can we just put this script in init.d?
[Xperia Arc Android Development] iridaki:
Yes, that's the point, but those values are tested on my phone only and they are pretty low compared to default, so they may cause issues for other devices.

This is meant to be a sample script to set your own values. ;)
[Xperia Arc Android Development] ShyamSasi:
Thanks Iridaki. Applied the script let me monitor how it does. :)

If anyone is too lazy to create the script here. Just put in under system/etc/init.d and give proper permissions ;)

View attachment 001_uv.zip
[Xperia Arc Android Development] zpmarcos:
Hi,

I have a Xperia Arc S with doomkernel v17 and arconium 5.6!!!

My baseband is -56!

Should I downgrade it to -36 or leave it like it is?

Thanks!
[Xperia Arc Android Development] dexterfunk:
I'd go to -36
[Xperia Arc Android Development] plopingo:
Stock FW 4.0.2.A.0.58 + baseband -36 + -36 libs + V17 = random reboot

V17-FIX2 testing in progress

EDIT : still rebooting @ 2ghz :/

EDIT 2 : no problem at all @ 1.8ghz

---------- Post added at 09:14 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:14 AM ----------

.....
[Xperia Arc Android Development] DooMLoRD:
v17/-FIX/-FIX2 works fine on .42 FW + -36 baseband (+libs)
[Galaxy S II General] dead soul:
How do i remove the Voice mail icon at he top of my screen ???? It jus nags doesnt clear up even after listening to the voice mail ??
[Galaxy S II General] jr866gooner:
You need to delete it then it should go! :-)
[Galaxy S II General] dead soul:
I cant clear it !!! I have tried alot thats y i decided to post thw prob here !!
[Galaxy S II General] jr866gooner:
Lol oh dear... ;-)
[Galaxy S II General] killall:
I had similar problem. Cleared once I had set my Voicemail number in Phone Settings. Hope this helps. :)
[Galaxy S II General] Nitroz:
Hello Guys,

I'm pretty sure you are aware of the controversy between me, DesignGears& Pulser lately with my ROM (Infusion) and below is the whole truth, I'm not hiding anything anymore as you deserve the truth.

Just going to cut straight to the point.

Yes, I stole Cognition 1.13 and applied my own theme and claimed it as my own, I also stole Villain ROM 2.0 & also claimed that as my own, the situation got WAY out of hand and I have personally apologised for Pulser & DesignGears for his.

Me & Pulser are in talks to resolve the issue with my ROM & most likely it will eventually get deleted, as, honestly, I am not a ROM cooker, I'm a theme creator & wanted to show my themes potential in a ROM.

I will continue posting my themes on XDA, I just hope everybody can forgive me for what I've done, I have refunded all donations received as I do not deserve them, you should be donating to Pulser & DesignGears, I did nothing.

I have a new theme coming up with permission for use from BoyRacer and we're working on something great.

Take it easy & I'm sorry.

NitrozK
[Galaxy S II General] pulser_g2:
Flame at your peril... While some people are understandable pissed off at what happened, please keep this civil.
[Galaxy S II General] kryptoner:
so you are back on xda... what about the website?
[Galaxy S II General] Nitroz:
I'm still using the website, thats for exclusive stuff :P
[Galaxy S II General] prim3geek:
well at least you had the guts to tell us the truth have donated but wouldnt mind at all.. :)
[Galaxy S II General] stratplayer:
Fair play to Nitrozk, hope everyone agrees and they move on from this. The apology was comprehensive and named those whose work was used, which must have been quite hard to do.
[Galaxy S II General] kryptoner:
moving ahead, what are your next plans? any new themes? and are you really working on bringing the stock lock screen without using widgetlocker?
[Galaxy S II General] Nitroz:
I'm not even going to attempt to make a ROM to be honest, let's leave that to the professionals :P I do have a theme coming up which I'm creating now, do you remember the Spectrum theme from the SGS1? Well, it's like that, but better :D
[Galaxy S II General] nickwarn:
What a hell! And you swore yor innocence on Google+ and twitter. Charming

And what the hell was it you wanted people to beta test? this builds were already tested. I can say your unfollowed and i well never go near anything your name is on again. And you say your a themer, you f*****g port other peoples work. Even if you had permission that doesnt make you a themer maybe a porter.
[Galaxy S II General] Omnomnom25:
It takes a brave and humble man to apologise publicly. Props to you sir :]
[Galaxy S II General] cTrox:
What the hell man? I gave you the permission to use the theme for your rom but that was just a copied one? So you didn't do anything yourself and just put all the pieces together? :mad:
[Galaxy S II General] Nitroz:
I think you're looking at this from the wrong perspective. I AM using his theme as a basis of what my theme is going to be like, it's not going to be just copying and pasting and done, I asked for permission from the dev so I could use just a few images from his theme and he agreed and wished me luck, technically it is his theme I'm just adding to it to make it better for the SGS II. So, it's half porting, half adding to.
[Galaxy S II General] B3311:
Good of you to man up, apologise and refund donations. Anything less would be unacceptable, as I'm sure you know...

You were in the wrong, you know it and you're doing as much as can be expected to make it right.

The many people here who will have lost any faith and trust in you is going to hurt, I reckon, but it's deserved.

Why not start again by updating the black theme that you had started on (with permission, for those who didn't know)?

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1131746

Lots of potential there, some bugs need ironing out though. See that job through and get some credibility back!
[Galaxy S II General] Nitroz:
I actually used the theme I ported from the SGS version just added a CM7 battery to it. Should of told you.
[Galaxy S II General] Gi3M0:
Interesting,I realy liked that ROM,hmmm,thanks got,I've found a replacement ROM,which is rock stable.
[Galaxy S II General] JJEgan:
Thanks for the apology a lesser man would have run off .

jje
[Galaxy S II General] Intratech:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/porter

:D

Regarding the thread. I'm all about sharing stuff and if someone can improve it in any way then great and I don't care for these arguments about who "burrowed" what from whom as long as the person's work is credited. In a way falsely taking credit for someone else's work is kind of a shady move but manning up and doing a full apology with disclosure of what you did kind of makes me like the OP a bit. I'm hoping it's lesson learnt and we can move on with the OP doing some great themes for the community.
[Galaxy S II General] JJEgan:
Porter a drink of stout topped up with water beloved of Smithfield and Covent Garden market porters in the Victorian age .

Generically used across the water for a drop of the black stuff before it was pumped full of nitrogen and frozen .

jje
[Galaxy S II General] Intratech:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porter_%28beer%29
[Galaxy S II General] daleski75:
Well I think that despite what he has done he had the courage to come clean and did not run off.

Don't flame the guy and give him time to redeem himself
[Galaxy S II General] jonny68:
I cant say i was even aware of anything like this,however the OP has done the decent thing and apologised so people should accept that and move on.