yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] XGr7078:
same prob here but with ginger dx v17 bootloader unlocked so can't access seus or pc companion... really worried about my phone's prob..
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] wankel29:
reset it with CWM....factory reset...
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] XGr7078:
can't boot to cwm i have xrecovery installed.

Although holding the power button gives me an option to reboot to cwm but can't it does only simple reboot........
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] demoniacs:
hit the back button when the SE logo appears to boot into recovery
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] XGr7078:
I did and booted into xrecovery and did full wipe and restarted the phone but it got stuck on gingerdx logo not se logo.:confused:
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] vikrant7027:
try using flashtool with ftf firmware files....and next time use CWMrecovery which does not show such problem
[General Questions and Answers] jodelol:
Hello folks,

I have a HTC Desire.

3 weeks ago I decided to explore the world of roms and roots.

So I rooted my HTC and after a week or so I installed Leedroid 2.4. (with app2sd) (without a factory reset)

When I did that I got a few more programs on my mobile eg.: CIFS manager, Homescreen Changer, a launcher and some more. So inside the rom were some apps I didn't had before.

So far so good.

Today I decided to wipe my Google test account and create one I'll like to use in the future.

These are the steps I followed:

Booting the phone in recovery mode (I took out the sc card)

I did a factory reset

I wiped all data from the sd card on my pc (except the Leedroid rom zip file for clockwork and some music)

put the sd card back in the phone

Booting the phone in recovery mode

installing Leedroid 3.0.8.2 (clockwork , install from zip)

After a some time all was done.

I have to say that my sd card has an ext3 partition of 512mb and the rest of the 4g card is fat32 formatted.

I was well aware that I wiped everything on my phone. I was planned.

But I was surprised when everything was done:

when I installed Leedroid 2.4 it took a long time installing

when I installed Leedroid 3.0 it took a short time installing

Also: I don't have the apps mentioned above when installing Leedroid 2.4.

Is this a very common thing and do I have to install those apps by myself and still it doesn't affect my upgrading?

Maybe this is very normal but it surprises me a lot.

Thanks for reading
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Trickee360:
What does it mean if, after resetting your phone, the battery level drops from 60% to 13%? Is that hardware? Is that the ROM? is that the battery?

I ask because, after hanging on a PRL update (that i don't think was successful) for an hour, the phone wouldn't stop pulling down data for any discernible reason, so I reset it. Before the reset, the SRF 1.2 baterry icon showed 60% battery and after booting back up, the phone prompted me to charge it because it was down to 13%. In addition, I put the phone on the charger for the PRL update, during which the charge level actually decreased slightly and the phone heat up to around 35C. Spare Parts reports the battery is healthy. Is this just a freak occurance or should I be worried?
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] stormglove:
Don't worry. Just run the battery calabation procedures. Theres several ways to do it floating around the threads. Also, i've had prl updates hang as well just check under phone status in settings if it changed. Even when it has hung on me it properly updated and showed whatever I was changing to.
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kobby2k6:
this happens to me a lot...i have calibrated a few times and it always happens...it usually happens after i dip below 70 percent in battery life..when i reboot, it can say 8 % or worse.and sometimes gets stuck at at a specific battery for a while and reboot sometimes brings it back to the normal battery level..i mentioned this before in a thread but I haven't found a solution...so i barely reboot my phone unless i need to backup in clockwork or flash something
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Trickee360:
Oh man. I reboot my phone once a day to flush the RAM and keep the system fresh.

I rebooted in CWM to reset the battery stats, btw, and when I hit the "reboot phone" command, it rebooted into CWM 3.0.2.5 (I'm running the latest 3.1.0.1), which was jarring. Before that, after leaving it on charger for less than an hour, it jumped back up to about 57% and charged to full in another hour or so. Unfortunately, the batt. reported a full charge at 93%. I bump charged it up to 94%, but I ultimately decided to reset the stats just the same.

Are these known symptoms of something, or just hiccups?
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] socos25:
I have had this issue as well. I believe it to be a calibration issue. I swap three different batteries so I attribute it to the different ones.

Strange thing happened the other day, my phone was at 22% or so and then all of a sudden just shut off. I switched batteries and it was fine, but strange.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] RyYYZ:
OK, so I've been reading guides, FAQs, how-tos, and various forum posts, and thought I had a pretty good handle on how to flash FW to this machine. So, last night I backed up everything important, and downloaded from here ( http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1102881 ) the following:

2.2 UGKC1/UGKC1/BMCKC1/Sbl. This is the stock FW as currently installed on my I9000M from upgrading through Kies.

2.2.1 XWJS8/XXJPY/OXXJS5 (MultiCSC) (no sbl)

So just as a sanity test I first tried flashing the UGKC1 PDA file over to my I9000M using Odin. This worked as expected, since it's the same kernel.

Next, I tried to flash over just the XXJPY PDA file over to my I9000, using Odin. No re-partition, no PIT, no modem or CSC. No go - it just repeatedly displays the GT-I9000M screen and never boots the kernel. Couldn't get into recovery mode from this state, but was able to access 3-button download mode.

So, tried flashing over the 2.2.1 XXJPY PDA, Phone and CSC files. Same as before - no actual boot.

I flashed it back to the 2.2 UGKC1 PDA, phone and CSC files, and did a factory data reset and cache clear, and everything was fine running 2.2 again.

From reading here it appears that others have successfully installed 2.2.1 or even 2.3.x kernels on Bell Canada GT-I9000M phones. So, what important step did I miss?

Do I need to re-partitiion? Do I need to use a 2.2.1 FW that includes the boot loader?

For now I'm OK running 2.2, but would eventually really like to be on 2.3.x and don't want to wait for Samsung to make 2.3.x (what happened to 2.2.1) available to GT-I9000M phones. I'll leave it alone for now as I'm going on vacation in a couple of weeks and don't want a hosed phone.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] gfacer:
What happens if you flash just a kernel like CF root or speedmod? My only other thought is to redownload jpy and try again as maybe the download was corrupted.

Also with another kernel like speedmod you could download and install a custom rom on cwm (clockwork mod) via recovery that is 2.2.1

I've had some problems with 2.3.4 (never tried 2.3.3) so I am back on Froyo for a bit until things get sorted out a bit more.

G
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] RyYYZ:
I don't know if there is a suitable version of CF Root for the UGKC1 firmware - they mostly seem to be oriented to the more international versions. As usual, in Canada we get something a little weird. Don't know about speedmod.

I don't think there should have been any problem with the downloads, as the files themselves are in md5 format, which means they are getting verified by Odin 1.8 when it goes to use them, as I understand it. If they were corrupted Odin should complain about it.

With the announcement ( http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1158492 ) that Gingerbread is supposed to get an official release to Bell phones soon (which mine originally was), I might just let this lie, for now.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Elrondolio:
There is a gentleman on youtube by the name of AndroidGalaxyS (original, I know) that has some excellent and detailed walkthroughs and reviews of various ROMs for the I9000M.

youtube.com/user/AndroidGalaxyS

Specifically in your case, you'll want to watch this one that shows how to install 2.3.4 JVP:

youtube.com/watch?v=cLXQn0gOBuA&feature=feedu

Good luck.
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] gfacer:
I agree that the source maybe lacking. I just found out that the JL2 firmware from samfirmware.com is missing db_data file so I would always get an error after flashing that. KC1 would also not always boot for me so it might be missing something too.

That said what are you trying to accomplish? If you are just trying to go to another stock rom I'd just leave it and put a custom kernel on to give you root and CWM recovery.

Most any other Froyo rom is flashable from CWM in recovery and you do not need to worry about odin except to recover from bad things and it looks like you can do that. Gingerbread is different because they changed the bootloaders and that means Odin.

Of course its getting harder to dig back and find those Froyo roms since the rest of the i9000 world has been on GB for a while.

G
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] RyYYZ:
Thanks for the replies, so far. Mostly I was just experimenting, and trying out XXJPY was just a first step in my experimentation before moving on to GB. Part of the reason for this is that it seems like a lot of the modified kernels and so on are meant to be flashed over certain versions of the firmware, and those versions don't include the Bell/Virgin-specific ones. Or maybe I've misunderstood how this stuff works.

Yes, while my attempts to install XXJPY have been a complete failure, even when re-partitioning with a PIT file, when I re-flashed back to the stock UGKC1 FW everything was fine.

At this point I'm just trying to get a better understanding of where this went wrong. I've never specifically updated the SBL - the JPY package I installed didn't include it, and I didn't check off the "Update boot loader" box when re-installing KC1.

I've seen a number of posts here from people who updated I9000Ms to other FW, but unfortunately they don't seem to have detailed exactly where they started from, or exactly what they installed, or how.
[Atrix 4G General] CaelanT:
The following was posted about 30 minutes ago on the Moto forums by forum manager Mark:

___________________________________________________________________

1,360. Jul 7, 2011 1:23 PM (in response to berzerker)

When is the next firmware update to gingerbread 2.3. Let's try to stay on topic, and have fun.

1. It's kind of a loaded question. "about to start" and "a while" mean different things to different people. No lie, it's difficult to manage everyone's expectations. I don't want to set the wrong expectations. Mis-interpretation just leads to frustration and further pessimism. I don't want to promise something that I don't have the control over delivery. I wouldn't expect any soak sign-up, at minimum, for another week. Soon as we get closer to soak I'll invite everyone.

2. As mentioned before we are working on a Unlockable Bootloader solution for release later this year where our carrier partners will allow it. This isn't specific to any product or carrier. Further details will be released as they are known.

Mark

Support Forums Manager

https://supportforums.motorola.com/thread/45654?start=1350&tstart=0

___________________________________________________________________

Interesting that the unlocked bootloader seems to be separated from the GB update in the second post. Makes it look like the unlocked bootloader will not be coming till much later.
[Atrix 4G General] SoberGuy:
And even then, only when the carriers allow it. Will AT&T ever allow something like that? I say hell no.
[Atrix 4G General] Squeak22:
Except that all AT&T phones can already be unlocked with pudding, so it doesn't matter if they allow it or not.
[Atrix 4G General] ClearFire:
AT&T sells android phones that already have unlocked bootloaders and I do not see them having a reason to deny the update.

With that said pudding will give you unlocked bootloader, once applied, FOREVER! so it will not matter at this point if they allow it or not
[Atrix 4G General] NoNameAtAll:
They do? Which ones? Last I checked, all sorts of phones have locked bootloaders. It's just that Moto's the only one who actually does more than simply lock it.
[Atrix 4G General] CaelanT:
If the soak test sign ups started in a week, you could look at soak testing starting a week later, and if past updates are anything to go by, an update another week later if all went well. That puts the GB update at in the last week of July.

On the locked bootloader, a lot of people said they will not unlock until they get the official update enabling this, so although many of us are already locked, many people are probably getting screwed. Might push them to just unlock now.
[Atrix 4G General] SoberGuy:
In a sense, yes. A question, and then my thoughts.

While the AT&T bootloader can be unlocked now, is it possible (not likely, just possible) from a technical standpoint, that Moto could release a GB update that would prevent pudding from working? Say GB is release next week. A month from now a guy buys an Atrix, pulls it out the box with GB. Could that GB update prevent him from unlocking the bootloader? I think it's possible this could happen.

Further, my thoughts are that there is concern for future Moto devices on AT&T. We have a reasonable solution now, for this phone. What about future Moto devices? I don't think AT&T would allow such an unlock.
[Atrix 4G General] SoberGuy:
Which phones on AT&T come with an unlocked bootloader? Or do you just mean that they sell phones that have bootloaders that can be unlocked? Big difference, IMO. HTC doesn't care if you unlock their bootloader. Moto says you need carrier permission. What makes you think AT&T would ever grant such permission?

As for the rest, see my questions in my previous post. I'm not sure on the technical aspects of it, but I can see this making a difference in future devices, and possibly future Atrixes that are sold...
[Atrix 4G General] munchy_cool:
To hell with Motorola is all I can say. How can you start a project with no planned end dates. this is utter BS.
[Atrix 4G General] Sinful Animosity:
Inspire, Captivate, Infuse. Maybe a few more. These all allow for custom ROMs and kernels, and it's only Motorola trying to lock us down. HTC doesn't care, and the Inspire has tons of ROMs and kernels. Same with the Cappy. So why is it only Motorola if it's the carrier who wants it locked?
[Atrix 4G General] munchy_cool:
I agree, they are just trying to think that there are fools out there who will believe there BS reasons.
[Atrix 4G General] munchy_cool:
Rootzwiki just tweeted that Droid 3 is coming with a locked BL as well....WTF!
[Atrix 4G General] Sinful Animosity:
No way... Wow. Those Droid 3 users are going to raise a **** storm
[Atrix 4G General] OSNPA:
My theory on this is that carriers were willing to subsidize manufacturers' bootloader lockdowns that ensured the carrier bloatware would remain installed and stuff like tethering could be mitigated. Perhaps AT&T paid Motorola more than other manufacturers, so it's a matter of arguing over money.
[Atrix 4G General] SoberGuy:
Unlocked, or unlockable? If they are unlocked out of the box... I don't know. Maybe if presented with a choice (what Moto is doing), they would say no. But they wouldn't push for it up front. Maybe?? I don't know.

I still think they are just unlockable, and not unlocked out of the box. HTC allows for an unlock solution (my guess is so does Samsung). Not sure on LG. Moto decides to ask carrier permission.

I still see no reason why AT&T would approve such a thing. We haven't had a carrier-sold Nexus, and I'm not holding out hope we will. Look at how AT&T has crippled Android before: no sideloading, limiting apps, etc. And now you think they'll play nice with everyone?? LOL

I respect you, and I respect your opinion. I politely disagree. I don't think AT&T is the most advanced-user-friendly carrier (or dev-friendly, but we're not all devs here). Moto is certainly not the most dev friendly with the efuse and locked bootloaders. Combine the two and it's a damn mess. Shame, because I really like this lapdock feature that Moto wants to do more of.
[Atrix 4G General] NoNameAtAll:
No, those have LOCKED bootloaders. They're just easy to get past. Moto's aren't.
[Atrix 4G General] munchy_cool:
because Motorola encrypts them with signed keys ...
[Atrix 4G General] CaelanT:
Correct. Wife has Inspire and it's locked.

Have to create gold card to unlock it.
[Atrix 4G General] thebeardedchild:
Either way, WE already have an unlocked bootloader. So as far as I'm concerned I'll never get the GB update because I'll be too busy ditching Motorola altogether. The only moto left on this phone is the name under the earpiece..

Sent from my Motorola Atrix using the XDA App
[Atrix 4G General] munchy_cool:
yeah man, same here just waiting for the custom ROM's to come. :)
[Atrix 4G General] msd24200:
Yes it is, I was the one that asked him, the way Motorola vp for software development stated it would be after gb, if they allow it. It's still carrier dependent. I know we can take advantage of what we have now but Motorola needs to make official statements. I wouldn't be surprised if they some how modify the bootloader with the official gb release to stop the. Current unlock for those that flash it. I'm not trusting them at all, when to official gb hits id wait to update until we can verify the bootloader is still unlockable!
[Atrix 4G General] munchy_cool:
I asked him a few questions as well
[Atrix 4G General] msd24200:
It took mark forever to answer my question, I originally asked it yesterday. But of course his answer was no answer, just more Motorola run around.
[Atrix 4G General] quicklyspent:
I'm going on the assumption that the official GB update install would fail on unlocked devices. I have no desire to run the official GB update, so I unlocked.

The major selling point of an unlocked bootloader it to allow custom ROMs....
[Atrix 4G General] lsxrx7:
should we feel lucky ? :p
[Atrix 4G General] munchy_cool:
seriously I do not know what is wrong with Motorola. the devs can work on a 2ns init and they are like taking ages to unlock bootloaders. they are just lame excuses I guess, time to start something on twitter against Motorola I guess.
[Atrix 4G General] Sinful Animosity:
They might as well be unlocked. They make it extremely easy to unlock them. If indeed AT&T is forcing OEMs to lock their bootloaders, HTC and Sammy are using the crappiest lock possible, almost as an invitation to unlock.

Why Motorola can't or won't do it, we may never know.
[Atrix 4G General] SoberGuy:
OK, let's go back a bit here.

First, we agree that they're all locked. We also agree that some are easily unlocked.

OEM's lock them of their own accord. Neither AT&T, nor any other carrier, forces OEMs to lock their bootloaders. They (the OEMs) do this on their own.

Some OEMs (HTC, Sammy) just don't freaking care. They place a little cheap lock to prevent idiots from doing damage. But they acknowledge some people want to play with their toy, so they allow for a fairly easy unlock.

Some OEMs (Moto) buy the best damn lock they can. And (per Mark's recent post) they really only want to allow unlocking if the carrier says it's OK.

AT&T didn't demand that lock up front. Where did eFuse start? Was that first device with eFuse on AT&T? It is simply a practice of a manufacturer (Moto) that carried over to multiple devices on multiple carriers.

Moto, per Mark, now wants to adopt a policy of: "I don't care, just as long as it's OK with your mother".

Moto started this lock on their own. Now they don't care about dropping it, as long as AT&T says it's OK.

AT&T isn't forcing anyone to do anything. Moto wants to play the permission game, knowing AT&T would never allow that. What a crock.
[Atrix 4G General] darkamikaze:
Alright.. I'm no dev but lets get this straight... Last I heard..

ALL PHONES HAVE LOCKED BOOTLOADERS. BUT NOT ALL PHONES ARE ENCRYPTED.

ok.

Xda app via atrix
[Atrix 4G General] phobos512:
Dude, of course they have dates. They aren't willing to make those dates public. Either because they're incredibly bad at software cost estimating, or they're incredibly bad at keeping to software development schedules (both are possible). Because I seriously think that at this point with all the negative publicity, if they had GOOD news, they'd tell everyone. They've really got until 31 July at 2359 wherever they're located (I think CDT) to keep to what they're currently committed to.

Can they release a GB that won't allow the unlockable bootloader? Of course they can! Here's the thing though - some developer will be smart enough to save the file that is downloaded and rework it so that you can flash it to an unlocked phone just like the HKTW 2.3.4 OS. The trick will be, convincing people not to update the second an update notification comes up on their phone, and then dealing with the endless flood of "updated, lost root, help!" BS that will inevitably follow.

Pro tip: Don't update your phone until the devs get a hold of the file and say it's OK, IF you want to maintain control of the hardware you paid for.
[Atrix 4G General] munchy_cool:
^^ yes sir, i have always flashed my phones with dev builds, never tried a OEM build.
[Atrix 4G General] Swiftks:
+1

On a personal note, the gap between this phone, Motorola, the carriers and the customers has been an eye opener to me, as this is my first Android phone.

I've been saying this for a while now, I can't wait till the (Samsung ?) Nexus "Prime" drops this fall. I really understand and appericate the desire for a true Google experience type of phone. And it will be mine, oh yes it will... Not trying to knock the Atrix at all, it's a good phone, buts it like now I know. Plus, ice cream sandwich!!!! :D
[Atrix 4G General] Sinful Animosity:
Yes, I know all that... You basically said what I just said.

I know. Can't wait for it. Is it coming to AT&T? I'll still use my Atrix and lapdock for school and such, but definitely the Prime, or whatever it will be called will be my main phone.
[Atrix 4G General] Swiftks:
Rumors are that Google may try and release it to all major carriers... kind of like the Samsung Galaxy S2 will be.
[Atrix 4G General] guidoido004:
Please dont blame motorola for this bootloader problem, today i got the info of why they dont release( but i cant tell!), its not their fault!

Soon as possible they will release the bootloader, please be patient
[Atrix 4G General] Swiftks:
So you know why they won't release it unlocked, but you can't tell us... Can you tell us why you can't tell us? :D
[Atrix 4G General] crnkoj:
It's just another well placed tease from that guy... Guess no GB in july =/
[Atrix 4G General] CaelanT:
Motorola has not commited to any dates, that means ANY dates or times, including 31st July at 23:59 CDT.
[Atrix 4G General] surya_neo:
Does this mean...Motorola is not going to release GB or GB with unlocked bootloader...:confused:
[HD2 Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting and Genera] salmanhakkani:
i have HTC hd2

can i use both system windows & andriod ?

please guide

thanks
[HD2 Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting and Genera] Kameirus:
this is a great place to start

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1041206
[HD2 Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting and Genera] wwwee:
it cannt so far.
[HD2 Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting and Genera] Kameirus:
dont know what rock youve been hiding under

but you can have windowsmobile on the phone and run android from the sdcard
[HD2 Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting and Genera] htccraze:
as stated by Kameirus you can run windows mobile 6.5 using nand as well as running android off your sd card. infact some windows mobile ROMS include a android loader already built in.

this thread should shed some light on how to proceed to install Android onto your sd