yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Windows Phone 7 Development and Hacking] EnderPsp:
You did, but indeed, sided apps are revoked in Mango. Besides, I'd rather have the new radio that comes with the "Samsung Update", too.

What I meant, is we need the DeviceProvisioning.cab.pkg that gets the "Samsung Update" that will install the new Diagnose as well.

I'm sure now that people with Focuses NOT on AT&T don't get the new Diagnose because they don't get the "Samsung Update" after Nodo.
[Windows Phone 7 Development and Hacking] munkeyphyst:
while still on an unlocked NODO, couldn't you brand your phone to ATT-US and get the update? just throwing that out there
[Windows Phone 7 Development and Hacking] EnderPsp:
Well, that's the fun thing. You have to do the opposite, it seems. Let me detail.

For the past 2 days I've been tinkering with the 2 ROMS, Rogers and AT&T.

While I preffer Rogers, no matter what I tried, I couldn't get Diagnose past stock v927.

So today I tried the AT&T Rom (my Focus is originally an AT&T).

Now here's the fun thing. I fired up Wireshark and Procmon, just for fun's sake.

I flashed the AT&T ROM, and got 7004

Installed the 7008 update.

Installed the 7390 update.

- Note: still on Diagnose v927 here -

checked for updates... no updates! so, wait, no 7392? Hmmm.

Went down and did the unbrand hack: "ATT-US" => ""

checked for updates again... New udate! 7392

Installed 7392 update.

- Note: Diagnose now v1122 -

Checked for updates... no more updates! Branded or unbranded, same result. No longer "Samsung Update".

So, my guess is this: AT&T Focuses that haven't been flashed at all, will get these updates: 7008, 7390, 7392 and Samsung Update. I was unbranded from 7004 upto 7392 and I noticed I was still on Diagnose v922. Then I read a post somewhere on re-branding to update Diagnose, and it worked, I got the "Samsung Update" and Diagnose was also updated.

Now, those that have flashed the AT&T Rom (like me, described above) will get the 7008, 7390 update and that's it. To get the 7392, you have to unbrand. Also, there will be no "Samsung Update".

Since I fired up Wireshark and ProcMon, I've managed to "gather the updates and their web locations". Initially, these get downloaded in

"C:\Users\%USER%\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows Phone Update\AAAAAAAA - BBBBBBBB - CCCCCCCC - DDDDDDDD\Update\"

Here are the 7008 to 7390 update files (50 MB) exactly how they were downloaded in my \Update folder and their links on download.windowsupdate.com

Btw, the file says "7008 to 7392", but it's a typo, should be "7008 to 7390"

http://www.multiupload.com/G7S45LGKXY

And 7390 to 7392 update files and their links. (100K)

http://www.multiupload.com/ULU9QJQSTA

Maybe it's useful for others or maybe someone can extract the .pkg file to install the "Samsung update" or something to oficially update the Diagnose for people with Focuses on anything other than AT&T. :cool:
[Windows Phone 7 Development and Hacking] dcsmaniatico:
No need to reset or look for codes

I don't know if anyone post this but I had the same problem with the internet and th MMS they where not working. There IS NO NEED TO RESET OR TO CALL AT&T FOR UNLOCK CODE.....

SIMPLY HAVE INSTALLED SAMSUNG TOOLS (BY GAZZ) FROM NODO WHEN YOU DO THE UPGRADE.....

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=924497&page=9

AFTER YOU MODIFY THE UNLOCK WITH *#9908# SIMPLY GO TO THE SAMSUNG TOOLS AND CHECK ALL THE BOXES AND APPLY IT WILL REBOOT AND VUALAAAAAA YOUR FOCUS NOW HAVE INTERNET AND MMS AGAIN.....

RUNNING MANGO FROM MY FOCUS
[Windows Phone 7 Development and Hacking] dcsmaniatico:
dobble post sorry
[Windows Phone 7 Development and Hacking] lemonspeakers:
is this strictly focus only? what about venuepro?
[Windows Phone 7 Development and Hacking] EnderPsp:
Samsung tools.... DVP can't run that or Samsung's Network Profile (which is in official Marketplace).
[Windows Phone 7 Development and Hacking] hx4700 Killer:
You can test the XML/diag codes on any phone and see if they work for you or not. If they work then there is no reason that the full process wouldnt work on your DVP as long as it is unlocked already.
[Windows Phone 7 Development and Hacking] gregrey:
is there anyone who can confirm where i should put the provxml foldler? when i try and test the original unlock it does not complete the process so i think i am putting the unlock/xml in the wrong folder or location. thx.
[Windows Phone 7 Development and Hacking] MrNetrix:
Put it on the root, where the Windows folder is located.
[Windows Phone 7 Development and Hacking] gregrey:
i did that. how can i tell it is unlocked or not?
[Windows Phone 7 Development and Hacking] tanders04:
Try and deploy a xap and see if it deploys.
[Windows Phone 7 Development and Hacking] buffalosolja42:
Just for clarification

I can't sideload apps on Mango, and I need to have zune on two different pc's for sake of backing up using older zune right. Sorry but I think this needs a video tutorial just to simplify, I am not scared to do any of it just don't feel like buying a new phone or spending half a day troubleshooting at the moment.
[Windows Phone 7 Development and Hacking] hx4700 Killer:
Zune 4.8 will restore a backup made with zune 4.7 so you shouldnt need two computers. The step by step that I wrote out worked perfectly for me and a few others. It really shouldnt be that difficult. You do of course have to start out dev unlocked though!
[Windows Phone 7 Development and Hacking] buffalosolja42:
I got all that your tutorial is nice

I am just touching all bases so, making sure I do it right, so I need to make a folder correct for the unlock xml? Just making sure could of swore when was reading (mind me under influence a bit) that it said some already had that folder the provxml folder....... I think that is the only thing that I am worried about as everything else is pretty straight forward (all is but again wanting to rid doubt for my sake). Thanks for your help.
[Windows Phone 7 Development and Hacking] buffalosolja42:
well if anyone wants to remote login to my machine your almost welcome

I have done everything literally, my device knows there is an update but I keep getting the 80180084 error (my phone is not Walshed) ran the tool anyway it say success but each zune on 3 different pc's fail two 4.7 and a 4.8........
[Windows Phone 7 Development and Hacking] buffalosolja42:
So phone just decided to go to Mango..

Guess I need to read how to get everything working well, ;) thanks all and thanks Zune for waiting a week to decide to upgrade :P
[Windows Phone 7 Development and Hacking] minori_aoi:
Soo ... is this worked on 7712 ???
[Windows Phone 7 Development and Hacking] Nowaynoway:
thank you for this, now the good question is how we can manually setup MMS setting is my country is not support in Samsung networkapp ?
[Off-topic] GadgetMonger:
The woman is guilty as sin. What the jurors were thinking I'll never understand. They knew enough to disappear though, didn't they....
[Off-topic] fleurdelisxliv:
THAT IS CRAZY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :eek:
[Off-topic] jaszek:
CRAZY???????

THIS IS SPARTAA!!!!!!
[Off-topic] watt9493:
i agree its nuts.....
[Off-topic] jaszek:
Shows how great this county's judicial system is.
[Off-topic] Amontgomery:
Unfortunately, they did all they could with the evidence they had. The bottom line is, it doesn't matter what a person does, it matters what a person can be proven to have done. Actually, it is a good thing, it means that a jury can remain impartial regardless of what public opinion is at the time.

It is also far better to let a guilty person go free due to lack of evidence than it is to convict an innocent person with little to no damning evidence based on precedence.

In my personal opinion, the prosecution was over-zealous with the murder 1 charge, negligent homicide would have been much more believable given the lack of evidence.
[Off-topic] jianC:
"She was convicted only of four misdemeanors: All of them about lying to investigators."

-CBS news

WOW. How she even explain her way out of the duct tape evidence?
[Off-topic] westicle:
Murder in the first degree is premeditated. They couldn't prove that it was first degree murder...

Sucks because the prosecution went for the big bang and failed horribly. She would have been convicted on a murder 2.

Damn idiot lawyers trying to make themselves famous let a bad person go free.
[Off-topic] davidstech11:
Justice was served. Even if people don't agree with the 12 men and woman who for weeks sat and heard the evidence.
[Off-topic] rwells813:
Guess the glove didn't fit, Taha. She'll get what's coming sooner or later. Karma is an undeniable Beast. But the evidence wasn't there, That family knows exactly what happend. And there's no way we can talk like we really know what happend.
[Off-topic] Deleted member 3572053:
The state made a bad case. A really bad one.
[Off-topic] rwells813:
Forsure, they should've just stuck with Agg.manslaughter instead of going for DP. It Was bad enough for Ashton to retire.
[Off-topic] jianC:
"No one is judged "innocent" in a criminal trial; it's either guilty or not guilty (not the same as innocent)." -somewhere in Yahoo Comments..

That pretty much sums up what happens in court... sadly :(
[Off-topic] 4silvertooth:
If its political talk, please close.
[Off-topic] rwells813:
+1

10char
[Off-topic] xaccers:
Or "not proven" in scotland.

With the three verdicts they can give (not proven and not guilty actually amount to the same thing) a Jury can show that they believe the person is guilty but it has not been proven beyond all reasonable doubt.
[Off-topic] GadgetMonger:
So what went wrong? Was it our system? Or did she commit the perfect crime? By her actions through out this entire ordeal she all but confessed. How can so much circumstantial evidence not lead to a conviction. I didn't watch all the proceedings but I did watch pretty much all the coverage back when it happened and it seemed to me the prosecution introduced all the evidence and made a good case. I don't see how she walks...
[Off-topic] Hooride707:
Sounds like you want her to be guilty....
[Off-topic] 4silvertooth:
Moderator this is political talk.

@op don't break xda rules no political talks.
[Off-topic] Hooride707:
You know,you have the choice to not click on the thread and whine.
[Off-topic] GadgetMonger:
Want her to be guilty? No. Believe her to be guilty. Yes. Want some accountability? Absolutely!
[Off-topic] GadgetMonger:
Wouldn't classify it as political. More an off topic of some interest. If the mods disagree I'm sure they'll take action. Til then feel free not to read. :D
[Off-topic] deliriousDroid:
I agree, it doesn't really seem political

Sent from my SilverBullet 'HTCDesireZ running CM7'
[Off-topic] 4silvertooth:
Just wait. Peace.
[Off-topic] WarBird87:
I think the jury did there jobs, they based there decision on the evidence and not the emotions of the case. I was not surprised by the verdict because I have even said that if I was on the jury, and I knew nothing of this case, I would have a hard time convicting her of Murder 1 or manslaughter based on the lack of evidence and the he said she said...

If she really killed her kid then she got away with it, and she has to live with it. If she honestly didnt do it, then the justice system worked for her, but we will never know the truth and that is something the public does not deal well with. people are going to hate her because of their own opinions, but honestly no one was there, we dont know what really happened. they are judging her based on the fact that she lied so many times... which i know does not make her look innocent...

I dont know if she did it or not, i wouldnt go as far as to call her a murderer, because i cannot prove it, a bad parent, well thats obvious. but i think some people are taking it way to far and are way to emotionally involved in the case when they had no business doing so...

I do think that if the state did not try to go for all the beans with a murder 1 conviction, and just strictly stayed with a manslaughter charge they might have been able to get a conviction. but because the murder 1 came with a possibility of the death penalty, some of the jurors said that if they were to convict someone of death, they better know with out a doubt that that person did what they were accused of, with physical evidence, and they just did not have that here....

I personally still think the entire family was in on it and had something to do with it... it sucks that this little girl has been killed but with out evidence linking it one way or the other its never going to be solved...

I was thinking about what if they did convict her, killed her and she still claimed her innocence all the way up until her death... and everyone hated her, thought she did it, then someone finally comes forward, with a confession and some sort of physical evidence proving he or she killed that little girl and the state killed her mother for no reason... how bad do you think the jurors would feel then? what would everyone say that swore up and down that she did it only to find out that they let their emotions make opinions on her...

its funny how people forget the whole "Innocent until proven Guilty" they get it stuck in there heads that its "Guilty until proven Innocent" and then when the person is in fact found Not Guilty, they b!tch and complain about it. Just imagine all the people who have been wrongfully convicted that no one believes.
[Off-topic] Gonzo__:
:P
[Off-topic] JimmyMcGee:
It's not.

They aren't talking politics. They aren't debating how one party is better than another.

And neither would I. It is in Off-Topic so is ok. If it denigrates into Flaming and non-respectful discussion, then the Thread will be closed and appropriate action may be taken, up to and including temporary bans. So stay respectful and this discussion can continue.

I'm waiting. ;)
[Off-topic] GadgetMonger:
So it sounds like you believe she did have a hand in the childs death but the prosecution failed in that they put the death penalty on the table. Even though this particular crime would warrant capital punishment? I don't necessarily disagree with that accessment, but if that is the case there is something seriously wrong with our justice system and it needs to get fixed.

What is unique about this is so many watched it unfold live as it happened. We all saw her as she lied and witnessed her uncaring attitude first hand. We heard the fear in the grandmothers voice when she made that first 911 call and how she all but accused her daughter of no good during that report, then we saw the complete turn around as she realized the consequences of that call. In my mind this is all evidence. No? Not to mention those Courthouse tapes everyone saw.

For myself all of that adds up to a conviction, whether the death penalty is a possibility or not. There was obviously there to connect the dots I thought...
[Off-topic] WarBird87:
I think people in her family know what happened to her, whether that be casey herself, or her parents or ever her brother... but we will never ever know the truth about what actually happened the day that little girl was killed.

The crime does warrent capital punishment, BUT the state should have realized that the lack of physical evidence in the case would make it extremely hard for the prosecution to prove with out a reasonable doubt that she in fact killed her child. There was no definet cause of death, there was also no motive. The state tried to say that she killed her because she wanted to go out and party, but she had the luxury of 2 grandparents who would watch her while she was out anyways, so why would she need to kill her for that? That is how the jury saw it from the state.

You have to remember that just because the public saw all these things and how she was and this and that, the jury doesnt doesn't always see everything we do, they don't always hear everything the public does. The lies, the He said She said between everyone on the stand and both the defense and the prosecution could have swayed the case either way. Ultimately i think the lies and the untruthfulness didn't make the jury think she was guilty because the mother and father were lying just as much as she was.

Circumstancial evidence in a case like this just isnt enough. They have to have a cause of death, a motive, some type of physical evidence, dna, murder weapon... with all the duct tape, decomp smell crap evidence that the state had the defense had someone testifying against it, it was leveling the playing field...

remember the prosecution needs all 12 jurors on their side...

The defense needs just 1...
[Off-topic] GadgetMonger:
True. The jurors didn't necessarily see what the rest of us saw that lead so many to believe she was guilty. Honestly I don't see how anyone who watched this unfold could not believe in her guilt. But doesn't that expose a huge flaw in the system? If so many who saw first hand as it played out have no doubt she did it, yet a relatively inexperienced defense attorney could make all that go away in a court room, doesn't that raise a red flag or two? I mean wouldn't that mean that many who would be otherwise obviously innocent could still be proven guilty in a courtroom by a crafty prosecution and a manipulation of the facts? This whole thing just stinks to high heaven...
[Off-topic] WarBird87:
you have to remember how the jury is picked... the defense has to want the person on the jury because they think they will be able to get them on their side and the same goes with the procesution. they want people who know little or nothing of the case, who are not biased, racisit and anything thing else that could be used to easily sway them one way or another. basically they need to find people who are smart enough to understand what is going on but who have been under a rock not knowing of this case. I live in pinellas county florida actually about 5 min from where the jury was picked and i can tell you i must have been under a rock because i had not heard about this case back in 2008. But the reason these people where on the jury is because they could not be easily swayed to believe one way or another that she was guilty just because of lack of emotion, or her lies.

but yes, you are correct i am sure there is plenty of people who have been convicted of crimes they actually did not commit because of the way the prosecution presents the case, wins the jury and locks up an innocent person. this was especially the case in years prior, im talking 1850s to 2000s where the city folk wanted people to be in jail for crimes committed so they just arrested anyone they thought they could make the jury believe they did it and throw someone in jail for it causing the town or city to think that everything was fine except the real perp was still out there...

Thats why you have so many people being released from prison latley due to new DNA evidence that can prove that they did not commit the crime back in the day... this is phy physical evidence is so key to a trial because it cannot be manipulated. circumstancial evidence can be!
[Off-topic] GadgetMonger:
Just seems like it's all become nothing more than a game, instead of a quest for the truth and true justice. It's more about who can manipulate the system and the laws to get the results they want than what actually took place and what is right and just. Even physical evidence can be withheld if any particular attorney is resourceful enough to get it done. Very disheartening.
[Off-topic] WarBird87:
that it is... with enough money, the right council can be had and who knows what outcome could come of it... its just the way things are, and it will never change...
[Off-topic] JimmyMcGee:
[YOUTUBE]6Xywqv1cDH8[/YOUTUBE]
[Off-topic] nattygirl:
Shocked that she got away with it.
[Off-topic] platy222:
that is unbelieveable!!! i am totally shocked, don't know what to say...
[Off-topic] Hooride707:
The system has always been played and manipulated,you just got to see this one on tv.
[Off-topic] davidstech11:
With enough money? I guess that means everyone can get the "right" council. Because Casey Anthony had to have the state pay for her attorney fees because she didn't have a way to pay for a defense. Since everyone has this right we should all hopefully have access to the best council regardless of income.
[Off-topic] vetvito:
The lawyer got most of the 200,000.00 Casey received from selling photos to NBC. Then the state picked up the rest.

Lawyer was OK, prosecutors were terrible. They didn't have definite proof, and they went for the WRONG penalty.

Dont blame the system.
[Off-topic] stayintwisted:
I do not have any idea whether she was guilty or not,, but I do know I would have hated to have been on the jury,, those people were not allowed to convict her because they "thought" she was guilty,,they had to base their decision on the facts as presented to them,, makes it a lot more difficult than for us on the sidelines who can base our decisions on whatever we want and have no repercussions no matter if we are right or wrong
[Off-topic] Mkee87:
I'd still bone her
[Off-topic] watt9493:
You sir, would have no penis left. Shed eat it

ADR6300
[Off-topic] :
No, he'd just have no worries; she'll get rid of the kid if he has one with her. :D

-Remember, Android hell is a real place and you will be sent there at the first sign of defiance-
[Off-topic] Jardicel:
The courts work on only evidence. They're bound to it, unless she confessed there's not much to go on. She probably should've confessed and got the sentence. She'd be better off, now some crazy psycho will probably give her hell.
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] convotutor:
Hi,

I've got a question regarding going back to "stock" in order to do a clean flash of new custom roms.

Is there some inherent "stock" form of rom/kenel/modem for the vibrant according to the manufacturing date? I'm confused b/c I bought my phone second hand and I dont' know what the stock form was.

Thanks
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] daenigma:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1047087
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] convotutor:
Hi,

So by you referring me to this guide, no matter when I got the vibrant, manufacture date, ALL samsung vibrants come with JFD 2.1 Eclair as stocks?

Thanks!
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] s15274n:
That's what you want. I'm assuming he referenced my guide.
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] convotutor:
OK, Thanks.
[Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] daenigma:
Yes I did sorry if I did not mention it in the post... :\
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] ROM_Guest:
Hello,

I am trying to draw notes on my android, like Windows Mobile did <with the stylus, finger, *and the ability to scroll down the page*.

So far I've tried:

-Note Everything

-Evernote

-Whiteboard Pro

These let you draw (i don't think evernote did), but not scroll down the page. ie: you get one screen only to write everything down. Not exactly great for a shopping list, or if you dont write small.

I also use Companionlink (and Dejaoffice, the android component of Companionlink), to sync my outlook Notes, Calender, Contacts, to my android. Companionlink's Notes component syncs all notes, but doesnt allow you to read/edit/create, drawn notes.

I don't want to use any cloud services for notes that Google might offer w/ its docs.

Any help would be appreciated.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] ROM_Guest:
Solidus_n313

5th July 2011, 11:42 PM

http://xdaforums.com/show....php?t=1148413

ROM_Guest

Today, 04:26 PM

Thanks, thats nice and neat looking.

Still no scrolling though, or multiple notes.

[Bump post]
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] champofthesun:
page not found :\