yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] HellcatDroid:
Ohwow, this is cool :D

Running a freshly compiled testbuild of my kernel tinkerage and it's working nicely :cool:

Going to include this in the next release version, credits and link to this thread have already been added to the kernel-thread (pun intended xD).
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] isotoper:
I am getting this message When I'm trying to run the fix APK :

"No application can be found to open this file"
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] GIR:
I've tested it on the KG5 XEU firmware and I think Samsung lowered the threshold. The threshold is still there but not as much. I think there's something the Samsung dev's know that we do not. If they did lower it then why not all the way down to 0?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] xiga:
Hi guys

I'm on stock KF3 XEU and the fix works for me, but not in all applications. When i try it in Pool Break Pro it definitely works. It's immediately obvious that it's working as you can now do small corrections to your shots without tearing your hair out! Also, when i need to re-size a pic to be a new wallpaper it definitely works here too.

But when i'm browsing using the stock web browser it definitely does NOT work. The jerkiness is there always. I also tried it in the 'Adobe Reader' app, when i needed to read a pdf ebook, and the jerkiness was there also.

Is there something stopping it from working in certain apps?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] HellcatDroid:
Yeah, some Apps and UI elements have another "filter" to prevent accidental swipes and the such.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] xiga:
That explains it then. Thx HellcatDroid.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] SquirtingCherry:
Wich settings do i change in the advanced menu to make my screen more "snappy".

I noticed on stock sammy rom everything works ok, but when im on MIUI or CM7 and type messages a little to fast the screen does not register input unlike on the stock rom.

thx in advance
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] marbulas:
This app with gingerbread 2.3.5 and Superuser 3 beta 4 has a problem.

When an option showing pop-up message superuser permission has granted is on and enable service of TouchScreenTune, stock lockscreen gets stuck within 5~6 seconds and sometimes this issue makes screen doesn't turn on(but menu and back button & touchscreen itself still works).

Fortunately, this problem has a solution - disable option showing pop-up message superuser permission has granted of superuser 3 beta 4. But this is not a perfect and right way.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] cmd512:
Thanks a bunch, this was driving me insane!

EDIT: Fix doesn't work, I still get a 3-5 second pause after screen in before I can unlock the lock screen...
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] viva.fidel:
+1, updated superuser app and su binary to v3 and the app seems to crash my phone, disabling the service within the app removes this problem. Guessing it's some incompatibility issue with the newer su app
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] oyebto:
installed on my KI3 but somehow the fix doesn't work on the lock screen.. in home screen the delay is gone but in lock screen it still takes a while for my slider to respond to my touch.

EDIT: after a while it doesn't work also in the home screen.. the service is still running though. =(
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Denwa:
I have an over sensitive issue with keyboard. I barely even come near the keys and a hit registers. What parameter would I adjust to change that?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Denwa:
I figured it out. Sensitivity is the BLEN parameter.

Default is 32. 255 is so sensitive you don't have to even touch the screen!

Warning. Turn off service first when trying his out becaude to low means no sensitivity at all. I'm trying 18.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] djgius:
Can anyone of you explain what are and what functions have all the advanced parameters of this app?? thank you
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] pepemosca:
Is this the same problem as this one: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1214019

Will this APK fix the mentioned issue?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] pepemosca:
--- delete post, please ---
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] planetf1:
When I try a test tool to show my touchscreen co-ords I notice a "stickiness" in the initial move of around 15 pixels.

Until someone pointed me to this thread I'd not noticed any touchscreen sensitivity issues - indeed on other devices I've found them too sensitive with icons moving too easily -- so I suspect this parameter has been determine to be the best for people on average.

Of course it may not work for some people or scenarios, so useful it can be modded.

Is it mostly games people find the most impact? For desktop I don't think it's an issue for me...
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] v1rtu4l:
this is most probably done so by design and not a bug.

i can see that the behaviour of the galaxy s2 will help in situations where you just want to tap the screen to prevent it from going over the timeout and turning off the screen. the old galaxy S1 behaviour would shift/move the document/website or whatever you are reading right now instantly no matter how hard you try just to touch the screen and not to move the finger on the screen.

this is most likely a move threshold which is necessary on high sensitivy touch screens since they sense more finger movement than deliberately done by the user.

the fact that it is "fixable" by changing a value in the source code does pretty much show that it is no bug.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] myshu:
BLEN = 28-30

Move Hyst = 1-2

These settings are good enough for me. You still get a little jump to avoid accidental screen touches and sensitivity of the screen is lowered a bit from 32 just so if you're wiping the screen while it's on you don't interact with the phone.

Lowering sensitivity (blen) under 25 makes it really hard to detect the finger; barelly touching the screen surface won't be detected due to the gorilla glass in low sensitivity settings.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Techvir:
This issue is present in the newly released galaxy note and the fix has helped.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] busterdev:
what is the advanced option for accuracy?

like having smaller blue circles?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] jay_993:
Thank you very much for awesome app :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] pepemosca:
Does it solve all your problems?

I still have issues with the SGS2.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Techvir:
Not 100% but it does improve
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Denwa:
I'd like to remind people that some kernels have mods to these parameters so settings that work finr for one kernel might be wonky for another!
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] fire_fist:
I get a lag in response in the lockscreen. As in, it takes a while for touch input to be sensed. After the 3-4 second period (BLN turns on), everything is perfect and the touch sensitivity is as set. Any solutions?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] viva.fidel:
Anyone figured a solution to get the apk to work well with the new superuser? If I enable the service then the phone gets stuck at the lockscreen every other time
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] sadonlyone:
+1 like viva.fidel said.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] pepemosca:
The only solution I found: Not enable the service and "Apply" it manually.

A better solution: use SiyahKernel 2.1.1 wich has the fix already included.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] netchip:
Even better option: build your own kernel, it is easy :D

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] rdy2go:
Just donated thank you.

If you just could do the same for my galaxy tab which suffers the same issue...
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] vitalij:
Done - check dev section of tab 10.1 :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] irwanizam:
can i use this APK with Galaxy Note?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] hielo_te:
any way to make this permanent ?

i mean to install apply fix and uninstall it...
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] ogdobber:
there are many kernels with the fix built in;)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] fr3quency:
like? :D 10chars
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] dhruvaz:
Is this problem on every galaxy s2?? i've used checkrevolution hd and hyperdroid i never had this problem. Not even when i was using stock rom.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] ogdobber:
just check the kernel features/changelog...the one I built has it (though it may not be up to date it was for kg6)... but the first "other" one I checked had it (something about ruling all kernels in the title:rolleyes:)

if you've never used it you don't know what you are missing:cool:
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] serge327:
can this be use on I9100G ?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Blu33:
I only see this work in the touch screen test area. It doesn't work on anything else like home, browser, games, apps, etc. What's the point? I still get a delay/lag like in the vid
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Man_Cave_Tech:
I've had 3 Galaxy S II's and never had a problem with any of them concerning touchscreen sensitivity. Certain apps with repsond differently to touchscreen inpit, but that's not a fault of the phone.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Blu33:
Its not really a problem for me either. Its just how the phone is
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] burimii:
Same here ...
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] HellcatDroid:
Views and most other UI elements have their own threshold / sensitivity filter.

So even the kernel already passes the movement to the app, the UI element decides to stall a bit more.

This patch only affects the touch feedback the kernel reports to the apps, so whatever UI element wants to move, can move, if they don't want to.... well, it's like trying to get a donkey moving that just doesn't want to.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Sleepycat3:
vitalij,

Any chance of updating your great app to support ICS on the SGSII?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] tsubus:
Thanks seems to be working well

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S II on ILWT CM7
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] radu_filip17:
same here too!!! please help
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] kgp700:
I'm updated samsung's official(not leaked) rom on korea galaxy s2

it's ..

terrible touch response

too heavyyyyyyyyy

it must need samsung's opensource
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] PsyOr:
I've tried this app, seems like it dosn't change something at ICS...

I have an issue (with touch - when scrolling fast up/down, left/right its loosing the touch) with every ICS ROM (Stock/AOKP)

[YOUTUBE]u3TxG3rqCe4[/YOUTUBE]

If you could take a look at my post and help me with this issue:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1767965

Thank you!
[General Questions and Answers] elliott35:
Anybody know about future phones and their release dates?

THUNDERBOLT
[Hero CDMA Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] cell2011:
Cyanogen 8? Is this next? Or is this in the works? Also is 2.3.5 next and would it be numbered a different version when Ice Cream comes out? Also is anything coming from the devs to overclock to 800 yet?
[Hero CDMA Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] cjdalessio:
It's been done. So very very few phones are even stable at 800, and those that could generally performed worse in benches at 800 than at lower clocks. Many of these devices bootloop above 700.
[Hero CDMA Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rizdog23:
Cyanogen 8 will not come out yet since will most likely be ice cream sandwich. I am not even sure is 2.3.5 will even come out and no the devs can not overclock this device to 800mhz because is 768 is the limit of the processor. Most people's phones do not even run that smoothly at 768 anyways. If somehow the dev found a way to overclock it to 800 (impossible btw but this is just a what if kind of statement) since the processor can not handle 800 it would just overheat the thing and cause crashes.
[Hero CDMA Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rizdog23:
Also, on a side note, this should not be in the Development section. This should be in general or Q&A
[Hero CDMA Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] xDragod:
This belongs in Q&A for future reference.

CM8 will be next, obviously. It will be based on Ice Cream Sandwich, so no, it won't be in development until ICS is released to AOSP so that the CM team can start using that code. 2.3.5 is an update coming out soon for the Nexus S 4G that fixes wifi and network speed, as well as adding more secure NFC for Google Wallet. It won't really affect us when it is merged into CM7. ICS is expected to be Android 4.0, but it could be 3.5 if Google decides.

There is a kernel that goes over 800Mhz, but anything over 768Mhz can be unstable on some phones. I tried it and there were no real performance gains, but battery life was a lot worse. Performance was actually worse at the highest CPU clock, in my experience. Just stick with 768Mhz. It's stable and chances are that you can get even better performance at a lower clock. I get better battery and performance at 633Mhz. It all depends on each unique phone.
[Hero CDMA Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] GeezyAF:
I lol'd at this statement. Did you not read any of the posts above you?
[Hero CDMA Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rizdog23:
When i began to post there were no posts yet. They must have got posted while i was typing. So seeing as the only post at the time was the op, then yes i did read the post(s) above mine.....
[Hero CDMA Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dastin1015:
I can confirm that the Godmode kernel was able to push some phones, such as mine, past 800Mhz. Although I had a faster processor speed, my battery would drain incredibly fast as well as overheat. Even though I never hit a bootloop with the kernel, the battery life, overheating, and loss of performance kept me away. Sacrificing too much for having a faster processor speed. Normally I overclock to about 729Mhz and have great battery life, speed and performance in conjunction with a min of 19Mhz and a smartass governor.

Sent from my Hero that never dies! ;D
[Hero CDMA Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rizdog23:
Thanks. I am glad someone at least confirmed it. I never knew about the godmode kernel as ive only been here for a little bit. Sorry for misinformed post about their not being an 800mhz kernel. As I can see, i was wrong, but also I was correct in saying that the processor can not handle it....sometimes
[Hero CDMA Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rubyknight:
Yup, I'm at 806 - 19 ondemand while posting this and I can already feel it slowing down a little. 729 - 19 on demand is my best setup. I've tested a lot with trying higher setups than that but so far 729 seems to be the best for battery life and performance on every rom I've ever tried
[Hero CDMA Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rizdog23:
For some reason my phone never works well with higher clock speeds no matter what rom or kernel i use. I get my best results at 710-352 performance.
[Hero CDMA Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kyouko:
In before bierce gives birth over ANOTHER question being in the dev section :D
[Hero CDMA Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dastin1015:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I've noticed is that newer Hero's that were sold with Eclair as opposed to the original Donut, when I bought mine, are not able to reach those higher processor speeds past 691Mhz.

Sent from my Hero that never dies! ;D
[Hero CDMA Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Bierce22:
i bought mine at radio shack back in september and it was still on 1.5 and ive never been able to get over 768mhz without it freezing and bootlooping its different with every hero.

i stay at 352-691 ondemand and thats plenty fast for me
[Hero CDMA Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jmphillips76:
Mine was running 1.5 also and it will run fine at 768 but battery life suffers so I usually run at 352/710 and battery and performance are good (depends on rom kernel)

Where can I get the godmode kernel ....
[Hero CDMA Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rizdog23:
I actually got mine two weeks after it came out.....so i mean it could just be that this phone is dead now. I never had a refurb or anything. I got it wet once but it got repaired. I've only had this one the whole time. Do you think that is the issue?
[Hero CDMA Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] chalan30:
Hey rubyknight,

just wondering why 19? Ive seen people do that but can the processor really ever do anything at 19? if so, doesnt it affect stuff like wake. Im trying it now just to see for myself. Ive been playing with a really high min value between 480 and 576 with the high at 748 and it actually doesnt only seems to affect battery life a little, both on the .29 and .35 kernels on jaybobs roms and on OMFGB.

Thanks
[Hero CDMA Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ch1naski:
It depends on the cpu governor that you use.

nandroids are for

sissies
[Hero CDMA Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] chalan30:
so update, ive run it at 19/768 on demand all day and after 11hrs 13 min its at 60% thats not bad for my phone! and there was almost no performance difference. Just the slightest UI lag... this is on jaybobs 7/8 with the .29 kernel, with background data off. And my regular usage which is not a lot. but for me its good. i wish I had tried it ages ago.
[Hero CDMA Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ch1naski:
I believe that you can set the ramp up frequency and that may help with the lag. Setcpu, advanced settings, I think?

nandroids are for

sissies
[Optimus One, P500, V General] zeri1133:
Hello everyone

I flashed my o1 with v20g (romania) using KDZ and for 2 days have been using the GB. Everything is fine but I noted that :

1- Feels slower than Froyo 2.2.2

2- The battery drains pretty fast not more than 16 h of battery. On Froyo I could get 2 days no problem.

My question is : GB was supposed to be faster and with better battery life or not?

Any solution or other room to use like v20c?

Or simply get back to 2.3.4 the Andy version?

Help.......
[Optimus One, P500, V General] FrenchOnly:
Hi there...

The answer is yes...it goes faster and has better battery life.

But nothing compared to andy's which is...very long battery backup

I had battery drain also on first success attempt of flashing, the second time went well...fast (well not that fast) and cold-long batt life...about a day last.

My suggestion is to reflash or to use any version which flashable through recovery, that means you dont have to patch lower baseband for andy's.

Regards
[Optimus One, P500, V General] zeri1133:
thanks for the answer

this means that on O1 the gingerbread did not gave what promised so what should be the solution?

Not use the official version of GB 2.3.3?
[Optimus One, P500, V General] FrenchOnly:
Well I'm not sure about exactly the 'promised' things..

But I can assure you that the official GB works very different than Froyo, the lagginess, the unresponsive touch and ramp up frequencies when you touch the screen, well its long gone for now.

Even that I used to have custom ROMs flashed in my O1, which were fast and had long lasting battery, I still like the official anc currently using one.

I think you should reflashed it or..use the official ROM from the dev section
[Optimus One, P500, V General] lekhwani:
Try Ginger lol 1.5, if you want a faster official rom. Its really fast.
[Optimus One, P500, V General] naturist:
Yes, its excellent in performance and battery as compared to official rom.
[Verizon Droid Incredible 2] ACD168:
[ROM] http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1151053

This is for beta 2.

This is to be installed ONLY after you have installed:

HTC_IS_V6.4_signed.zip then

Sense3.0_Update.zip

so you must be on sense 3.0

This THEME adds:

stock HTC icons.

removes the GPS cross-hair

added sense3.0 green over-scroll glow

CM7 based GingerBread popup notifications

Stock icons, and as you can see the GPS cross-hair is gone

the sense3.0 green over-scroll glow

CM7 based popup notifications

The pictures came out really grainy and crappy IDK why..

DOWNLOAD LINK
[Verizon Droid Incredible 2] ACD168:
reserved.

10char
[Verizon Droid Incredible 2] andybones:
Must be installed on Fresh ROM install. worked for me. thanks!
[Verizon Droid Incredible 2] mccarrel:
Friend stream

Loved playing around with Sense 3.0 but couldn't get friendstream to work since peep and facebook for HTC sense weren't on the Rom so I booted back into my 2.1 rom. Thanks for all your work.
[Verizon Droid Incredible 2] yoitsbry:
If you want to go back to the sense ROM by laibo that you tried but did not have facebook and twitter for htc. You can actually pull the .apk files from a different rom and add it to system/app while on that rom. This will add facebook and twiitter and you will be able to use it through friendstream widget aswell. Message me back if you need help. The two apk's you will need are htcfacebook.apk and htctwitter.apk after that is done simple go into settings, acounts and sync, add account and log in to both of those accounts.

Double check that you have a friendstream apk as well in there already.
[Epic 4G General] ptfdmedic:
Hey guys,

I am still able to send Google+ invites as of 12:30pm on Saturday, July 9.

I'm happy to add people in batches. All you need to do is go to my blog and send me an email through the contact form. It's easier for me to manage the requests that way. If you would please "Like" my blog, I would appreciate the support. The "Like" button is located at the top left. Thanks guys.

I'll add people as long as I have the button available. First come first served. I go in the order of the email I receive. Hope this helps. Please follow the instructions as I get a ton of requests and those that follow the instructions get my attention quicker. Google+ invites post

Big thanks to theduce for getting this started and trying to help everyone. I thought I would share the load while I can.
[Epic 4G General] belovedson:
Thanks so much

I hope to get it
[Epic 4G General] ptfdmedic:
If you sent me an email them I sent you an invite :)
[Epic 4G General] duce102:
Google+ invites post

Thank you ptfdmedic..... it was getting hectic over there lol
[Epic 4G General] ptfdmedic:
As long as I stayed logged in the Invite button remains. I've added like 50 people since last night.
[Epic 4G General] duce102:
Oh wow so you've been logged into G+ for the last 10 days lol I wish I was home before they shut it down so I could have done that =]
[Epic 4G General] ptfdmedic:
No... The button appeared last night. I've stayed logged in and I'm thinking maybe it's a glitch. It appears to be gone for everyone else.....

I can send out the invites. Whether they are letting people in right now is another story. I'm getting mixed reports. Many are getting in and some are getting the over capacity message and have to join later.
[Epic 4G General] PythonFanTN:
This morning it was gone for me....this afternoon its now back. I've only sent out maybe 10-12 invites max from the time I got in. My buddy checked this morning who probably hasn't even sent half that many and his button was gone too. Haven't heard back from him if his is back or not though. I can't tell any real rhyme or reason to the whole off/on deal in general with the invite/ability to join process either. But I do know I like Google+ just in this testing/infancy stage a hell of alot more than Facebook.
[Epic 4G General] Not too sure:
Got mine within minutes of sending you my email. Thanks button hit and, of course, one more vote for Lost and Tired.
[Epic 4G General] ptfdmedic:
Thanks so much.....
[Epic 4G General] Dragery:
Any chance I could get in on the invites?

jbharalson@gmail.com

I sent an email, and liked the blog :)

Thanks!
[Epic 4G General] RSPC:
Wow, That was fast. Got mine in just a few min..

Thanks!

1 more vote from me too:)
[Epic 4G General] ptfdmedic:
Sent 10char
[Epic 4G General] asiangolfer76:
If anyone has one left:

thanks!