yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Infuse 4G] melbourne408:
I personally enjoy taking trips to att stores and bringing my laptop to root and fix up the atrix, which is a huge paper weight in the end, sorry to be harsh but trust me. I've put CM7 on my friends infuse and it isn't a bad phone, far better than the atrix imho, cappy still the best phone, hoping things will actually go right in July and by the end of it I'll be with a cappy and a Galaxy S II, if so I'd wait on that for july, heavy emphasis leaning on the infuse vs the atrix :D
[Samsung Infuse 4G] The Jack of Clubs:
cm7 on the infuse? in what universe?
[Samsung Infuse 4G] melbourne408:
Haha

Edit

The land of sleep deprivation and htc's line gnawing away at my feet haha, sorry but all in all even though I'm still in the same land, atrix is first only over a og sk
[Atrix 4G General] artisticcheese:
I'm coming from Captivate and just got my hands on Atrix and first thing which I noticed how washed out colors looks like on Atrix. It appears like somebody added 3 screen protectors on top of Amoled screen the way Atrix screen looks compared to Captivate.

Another thing I'm trying to figure out is according to some links there is different speeds for 4G on Infuse and 4G on Atrix. According to URL below it's looks like Infuse 2x faster on 4G then Atrix.

http://www.phonearena.com/phones/compare/Samsung-Infuse-4G,Motorola-ATRIX-4G/phones/5119,4982

Secondly it appears both front and back cameras are better on Infuse which matters for me.

So wondering if somebody made a switch from Atrix to Infuse and found those things are true and were worth switching over?
[Atrix 4G General] joshyy_rey:
Here we go again ...

Sent from Moto Atrix
[Atrix 4G General] Tikerz:
If someone switched from the Atrix to Infuse, I doubt they would still be looking at this forum. You'd probably have better luck asking in the Infuse forum.
[Atrix 4G General] artisticcheese:
I'm interested in people who wanted to stay with Atrix as well after using Infuse.
[Atrix 4G General] Ciloteille:
I own all three Atrix infuse and inspire. I'd just have to clear this one up. The Atrix and inspire both speedtest at the same speed. The is is fairly fast on the infuse and screen is nice on it too. But when trying to load heavier apps on the infuse its a hair slower than the Atrix.(stock)

I must say the infuse has a quieter speaker phone.... no all audio levels are lower than my Atrix but the camera is better on the infuse. Video is about the same.

Conclusions ..... I'd say infuse if your more into media(video type for the screen) and audio wasn't as good on loud speaker but headphones sounds fantastic when in call or music.

1:camera

2:screen

3:form factor vs Atrix

But it does lose to Atrix on these things...

1:loud speaker

2:resolution

3:battery life (as I can make longer than 6 hours on Bluetooth call while webbrowsing and text mms also while still having juice left.) (I talk to my twin about 4-7 hours a night recently at work without charging till I go to bed all on Bluetooth.)

4:CPU power
[Atrix 4G General] Rayan:
Troll....

Next!
[Atrix 4G General] KefkaticFanatic:
Try and ignore the trolls on the forums that can't handle questions...

One thing to consider with the Atrix is that it's a Tegra 2 device. If you care about some of the higher end games at all, you'll want the Tegra 2 over the single core 1Ghz on the Infuse as games are made specifically for Tegra and even with Chainfire won't run as well as say the dual core on the Galaxy S II.

The dual core itself, while not properly optimized, is in raw specs better than having the single core. Perhaps it won't be noticeable if you don't run many things at once though, so consider that if you like the shape or colors or something else on the Infuse a lot more.

I've dabbled in some photography stuff myself so I know what you mean when you say you want a better camera. If it appears that the Infuse has a better camera not just in pixel count but also in actual quality in demo shots, and that really is a strong factor for you, then you should definitely consider that. Neither the Infuse nor Atrix will really get to use the front camera right (in Google Talk, Skype, etc) until the Gingerbread update. We know that the Atrix should be getting its GB update quite soon, so you should consider that.

I'm not familiar with much about the Infuse as I've only played with it once at a store and decided it was a bit too big for me to want to use. You really should consider that factor as well, as though it may seem ok in the store, after using it for a week you may realise that it's a hassle. Also, the Infuse battery is smaller than the Atrix's.

Basically, what I'm saying is look at all the factors and decide what you think would be best for you. Colors will not matter much if the phone is slow running what you want to run on it, but speed won't matter as much if you want photos that look better, eh? :P

If you can handle waiting, I would wait for the Galaxy S II variant on AT&T to be released so you can compare that with the Atrix. It's a very strong competitor that would be definitely superior to the Infuse.
[Atrix 4G General] artisticcheese:
Nobody mentioned 4G data speed specs mentioned in first link. According to those specs Infuse is 2x faster then Atrix. What do you make out of that?
[Atrix 4G General] samomamo:
Atrix is crap has the crap screen

samoled
[Atrix 4G General] dicksteele:
Haven't switched, but I've had Atrix just about since it came out. Wife got the Infuse. She loves it, except can't find a case she likes because its so freaking big.

If you want a tablet and not as much kick ass capability as the Atrix. Then Infuse is for you.
[Atrix 4G General] dicksteele:
Then take your sorry ass somewhere else.
[Atrix 4G General] LivingChampion:
I have the Atrix with Gingerblur and both my sisters have the Infuse @ stock.

Atrix is not all that much worse than the Infuse, they are about on par when talking about colors. I give the Infuse a 10/10 and I give the Atrix about a 9/10 from all the smart phones I've used so far in terms of clarity. Atrix has about the same Clarity as my Dad's iPhone 4. Infuse just noticeably has bigger icons because of the superior resolution of the Atrix. Most things load faster on the Atrix. Infuse has the superior camera, but Atrix's camera is no slouch. You also can't go wrong with the Atrix's battery life span.

That being said, I had to go through two Atrix's before the third one was working properly in a span of 4 days. One of my Sister's phone's Camera died on her after the third day, but she got a replacement. Both of our phones have been working properly since the replacements.

Tegra is great and I've been playing Apps since day one. All games seem to run smoothly.
[Atrix 4G General] trvstw:
Maybe you should try match.com
[Atrix 4G General] robonoob:
This guy again...get over it man, its a phone.

And to the OP, there are a hundred posts on Atrix vs. Blah blah phone, specs for blah vs. Atrix, I'm a troll this phone sucks vs. my blah blah phone, please search more thoroughly. No matter what the speed says on paper it won't go any faster than what Atts hspa+ will allow which is supposedly 6 mbps, Att hasn't launched LTE yet. The point of this phone is its tegra hardware and unique webtop ability. A screen is your preference, you don't like the colors, resolution, size, ect., get something else.

Sent from my Moto Atrix
[Atrix 4G General] XCellPhoneSalesRep:
Have both. Not switching to or from, about the only thing i switch to and from would be my SIM, between my HTC Desire HDs, neXus S, InFuSe, Atrix and soon to be SGS II. Unfortunately the InFuse has less going on then the Atrix, which would make sense because its a couple months newer. I just love playin AB with that big-n-sexxxy 4.5" Super AMOLED Plus display. I even donated my 2nd InFuSe to an up and coming DEV about a month ago and nothin is happenin over in that neck of the woods...:(
[Atrix 4G General] kleeman7:
I had an infuse for about two weeks, ran infused on it. Was a great phone. I returned the infuse for the atrix due to a few factors. Samsung will most likely not support the phone long due to sgs2. May or may not be true. I also have fell in love with the atrix, due to fingerprint reader, screen is nice once you havnt looked at the extream saturation on the samoled+. The way I see it the atrix is a little bit more future proof. If you have any questions pm me. I am on my phone right now otherwise I would elaborate some more.
[Atrix 4G General] silenzzzz:
i have both .. my main draw tho is to the infuse because of display quality and the battery life i get from it ... i can get about 12 more hours out of it then my atrix ...

i do like the atrix ... esp the fingerprint scanner ... so convenient ... but i have always preferred a phone with a larger screen size since i use mine more for a web device then just a phone (yeah i know the atrix has a dock but that isn't something you just toss in your pocket.)
[EVO 4G Themes and Apps] Jcki4:
please can someone make one i suck at this badly compare to other wonders of the devs please and thank you
[Captivate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] KonaZXIII:
I know when going backward from GB, that Odin One Click is the normal route (for me) but what if I want just the 2.2 bootloaders?

2. Is there any reason I'd want 2.2 over the 2.1 BLs if there is a difference?

If so-

(search has proved futile on this one)

3. Where/how do find and install just the 2.2 BLs?
[Captivate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] prbassplayer:
Im not sure but isnt 2.1 and 2.2 bootloaders same? Except for the retarted secondaries a few phones had? But I could be wrong.
[Captivate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] KonaZXIII:
Good info. This is the stuff I'm looking for.
[Captivate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] cappysw10:
GB bootloaders are backward compatible. Just be sure not to flash a rom with bootloaders in it.
[Captivate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] KonaZXIII:
I understand that they're compatible.

I'm mostly curios if there are any differences in 2.2 vs 2.1 bootloaders, or are they definitively the same.
[Captivate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] melbourne408:
If your looking for a noticeable upside to 2.2 bootloaders > 2.1 bootloaders there is nothing special with an ante up full throttle blend that's going to weave in and be steadily apparent. My cappy is one with eclair bootloaders and doesn't like froyo. With CM7 and a steady 1.5 O/C my phone is the dam best snapdragon, if even I could dream of its capabilities now. I'd stray from the path of 2.3 bootloaders unless your rom choice has implemented it and you don't plan on changing...still it's not reliable. 2.3 bootloaders are one thing, even more if they are not device specific :D

Sent from I'm sure glad Danger went under, else I'd still be on a Mr.Cartoon SK2.
[Captivate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] studacris:
There wasn't a change in bootloaders from eclair to froyo. They are the exact same.
[Captivate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] connexion2005:
Damn you Studacris for beating me to every thread I try to answer... :). As mentioned there is full compatibility between Eclair and Froyo sbl.bin and boot.bin bootloaders. The only slight difference is there was a definite fix in the Froyo sbl.bin which is what's in the ever popular 3buttonfix.zip that DG produced a while back. In reality the GB bootloaders are awesome as they allow a simpler button combo for DL mode and recovery mode and work with 2.1, 2.2 or 2.3.
[Captivate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] studacris:
Just to clarify, That is if you are referring to the I9000 gingerbread bootloaders, which yes I personally prefer because of that very reason mentioned.

The newly leaked I897 kf1 captivate gingerbread bootloaders have the old stupid combos for recovery and dl.

both sets of gingerbread bootloaders are backward compatible.
[General Questions and Answers] Mr_Joshua:
I am looking for an Android app that will push notification sounds (texts, emails, etc.) to my Bluetooth mono headset. I have used BT Mono to push media audio to the headset but notifications don't go through. Anyone know of an app or a way to accomplish this? Thanks!
[General Questions and Answers] Mr_Joshua:
Bump. Anyone?
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] lgevo:
Seriously am dying for CM7 like many of you. just curious if there is any info. Like a place to read about any progress like a devs blog? An I understand it takes alot of time and effort. I been using CM since i put android on my vouge. I check everyday to see if it the development section. This is the longest i have gone without it since my evo. I am going threw withdrawal D:
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] 063_XOBX:
There isn't any progress to follow, development is halted until Gingerbread Kernel source code is released and once that happens you can follow their progress at their GitHub.
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] lgevo:
dammn :( allright thanks for the info
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] the_dark_knighton:
I hear you man. I had cyanogen on my g1 back in the day. I really don't understand what is going on in github, not my language i guess. lol. I am waiting patiently until it comes out though. I wonder if they have fixed anything since alpha 4, or are they still on alpha 4?
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] pvtjoker42:
The last update I read about CM7 for the Epic was they were starting from scratch with a new kernel, and they almost had it booting properly, so who knows. Guess once the source drops we'll probably see some action then..
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Original Android <3ers!:
Damn bro you had a G1 too? Maan. Remember the good old days?! We had everything. CM4 through CM7, Blur, Sense, etc... we had a lot. Now we barley have ANYTHING. I woke up this morning, I was like "Damn. I should've gotten the N1 when I was still with T-Mobile." The N1 still has development and probably will even when Ice Cream Sandwich comes out and maybe past that, and we're probably gonna get stuck. Dude. I wonder if the G1 will see Ice Cream Sandwich...?
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zanderman112:
[QUOTE=Original Android

I would think so, since it got that hc sdk port.

Posted by Mr. Z's Epic 4G via Tapatalk
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] chris41g:
They have gone further than alpha 4, using some stuff from teamhacksung.. but they have to redo a lot, an start with a new kernel.. but as stated, development has halted for the most part... awaiting some colonels sauce..
[HTC EVO 3D] CheesyNutz:
http://conversations.nokia.com/2011...ersations-Posts+(Nokia+Conversations+-+Posts)

shot's from the new N9 phone from nokia .... CRAZY
[HTC EVO 3D] ExploreMN:
Am I missing something? They don't look that special or spectacular compared to shots I've taken the the Evo 3D.
[HTC EVO 3D] CheesyNutz:
the e3d can take detailed shot like that ? tell me the settings please im not knocking the camera on the e3d just dont think its can take pictures like this
[HTC EVO 3D] NewZJ:
If you want to take good pics, get a camera.
[HTC EVO 3D] donatom3:
Those are very good shots for a camera phone. They're above cheap point and shoot cameras.
[HTC EVO 3D] CheesyNutz:
i agree but that phones is taking pics as good as my wife's 12 mega pixel cannon that's what i fined crazy is the detail its able to pick up
[HTC EVO 3D] firmbiz94:
The n8 does even better..but I actually think the 3vo takes nice pictures http://www.flickr.com/photos/64460007@N03/5895063118/
[HTC EVO 3D] Genjinaro:
Yeah the N8's carl ziess lens & xenon flash is nuts. The sensor is freakin huge.

I've been able to pull off some excellent shots with the EVO 3D's camera though.
[HTC EVO 3D] liverstealerJobs:
Those really are very good for a phone.

But, just too many other things I want my phone to do. And I think I am really tied into Android. I am really liking this cloud/mostly open source thing. So going Nokia/Microsoft would be going backwards for me, a former Windows Mobile 5 user. Would that camera and lens combo be great on my EVO 3D? Sure it would but a couple things, I suspect, would have to go.

The 3VO takes just good enough impromptu snapshots for me. If I want keepers, my Nikon D2X and 17-55 mm lens fits that bill.
[HTC EVO 3D] dfin13:
Who carries their camera around with them everywhere? I'd love it if my phone took great pics. Hopefully we're almost there.
[HTC EVO 3D] liverstealerJobs:
Well, it is never going to. If you shoehorn a DX/FX size sensor into a phone, you still need the optics to capture that light. At which point you won't carry your phone around with you because the lens won't fit into your pocket.

BTW, if we were to compare the intent of the photos regardless of capture device, they would be subpar. That is, the photographer attempted to do serious macro and landscape work. If we were to judge the photos strictly on that, then they are subpar. But for a camera phone they are good. So what I am trying to say, professional photographs still need professional gear.
[HTC EVO 3D] XxDjbluexX:
Those pics were very impressive. It would be nice if HTC put in camera's of this quality, but the pics the Evo 3d takes are good enough for me.
[HTC EVO 3D] dfin13:
I said good, not professional. That Nokia camera seems to take the sort of shots I desire.

Anyway, I wouldn't say "never" -- who thought 5 years ago you'd have a phone with 3D capabilities?
[HTC EVO 3D] phatmanxxl:
Im pretty satisfied with the E3d camera, I give it a 7/10. Of course it could be better but it has exceeded my expectations and is a huge improvement over the E4g camera. Those Nokia pics are really good.

@dfin13 Five years ago I never thought I'd be streaming movies in 1080p on my phone. I think I was using a moto razr V3m, sidekick 3 and then a blackberry Pearl that year.
[HTC EVO 3D] mikeyxda:
I've been getting photos pretty close to that good with the Evo 3D. Maybe not quite as shallow DOF but just as sharp. I'll try to post some another day. No time today.

Mike
[HTC EVO 3D] liverstealerJobs:
Well I await the day they can change the physics of light and/or how we can capture it. I suspect I will be long gone.

As an aside, a gratuitous unnecessary shot at wedding photographers: If they can get that Nokia to sync to off camera flash, they then will be in heaven. Wedding photogs don't need detail, they apply 20 percent Gaussian blur to everything anyway. With a camera phone they can "connect" with their client even more.

Ducks head, as the lone wedding photog in the forum takes aim..
[HTC EVO 3D] SAShady:
If I were to be in an exotic place, I'd certainly be using my dslr and not my phone.
[HTC EVO 3D] dfin13:
I eagerly await that day then.
[HTC EVO 3D] Semantics:
Pretty sure you'll be long gone too, be careful what you wish for.
[HTC EVO 3D] patelkedar91:
Nokia's phones are GREAT shooters. Probably the best when it comes to cameras on a cellphone.

HTC needs to step their game up. Half of it is software, and that sucks. I'm content with it, but a lot of things could be improved.

Get the app "Vignette" if you really want to take some great pictures.
[HTC EVO 3D] Negrito:
Learn how to use a camera... Mine takes amazing pics for a phone.

Edit: sorry if that sounds condescending but its a phone. And to compare it to a Nokia with CZ glass is ridiculous. That's like wondering why my dslr pics are better than your point and shoot. Better equipment yields better results, but knowing what your doing yields the best results no matter the equipment.

From the 3rd dimension in wireless...
[HTC EVO 3D] NewZJ:
Nice pic, I'm impressed
[HTC EVO 3D] heygrl:
HTC's cameras blow. At least they've realized it with the myTouch Slide 2.

Nokia is doing very well, the rest of the phone.. not so much.

Samsung makes some of the best Android picture snappers..

Motorola - Below Samsung/Apple/Nokia

HTC - A hot mess along with the speakerphones. The HTC Sensation 4G/Evo 3D improves tremendously with stereo 128Kbps AAC audio w/ videos but still shots are still below my old Galaxy S Vibrant. The Evo 3D snaps even worse pics than the Sensation 4G.
[HTC EVO 3D] dca1970:
Please, someone show me a good pic that was taken indoors with there evo 3d!!!!
[HTC EVO 3D] 4dthinker:
You don't need a great camera to take great photos. You just need a great photographer. As for great indoor photos, you still need great light. Most indoor spaces are far darker than any outdoor space during daylight hours. Even a great camera with great lenses will suck at indoor photos when the light is poor and the photographer inexperienced. Wait until tomorrow and I'll post a few photos taken indoors with photo floods using my phone and a tripod (OK, some sort of tripod-mount and ducktape hack).
[HTC EVO 3D] Negrito:
How about in a bar...

Outside, after sunset...

It's all about knowing what you're doing.

From the 3rd dimension in wireless...
[HTC EVO 3D] ExploreMN:
I don't know...I mean I've never taken pictures of flowers and what-not before, but I guess next time the wife and I go for a walk I can give it a shot and see how it compares. But of the photos I've taken so far of my cat, baby, and wife it has been nice and seems comparable.
[HTC EVO 3D] rockky:
If you want decent data speeds get a computer.

Hardly the point.

I want HTC to simply start using camera's that are competitive in the SMARTPHONE world... (I already have two excellent camera's for shots otherwise).

Comparatively..3D shots in anything less than good light are c r a p.

UOTE=NewZJ;15295175]If you want to take good pics, get a camera.[/QUOTE[/B]
[HTC EVO 3D] ExploreMN:
Just curious here...you had something like 30 days to return the phone if you were that unhappy with it. Why didn't you? I've had mine for 3 days and I've tested every feature but the GPS so far and I'm pretty darn happy. I'll test the GPS tomorrow because that is what I do...use the return policy to allow me to make sure this is just the right phone for me. I'm not trying to be a jerk, but I just don't get people complaining about the hardware or software on a phone when they have ample time to change their mind and get something different.
[HTC EVO 3D] Overstew:
Here's a picture I took with my 3V0 @ Lowes.
[HTC EVO 3D] :
pic of a field
[HTC EVO 3D] bobdude5:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4017652/IMAG0089.jpg

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4017652/IMAG0068.jpg

Taken from my 3vo
[HTC EVO 3D] YoungSinema:
Those pictures aren't that great. Just my opinion.

12MP means nothing. Just means her camera can take bigger pictures.

Yeah right? J/K, but how did you get such great pics out of the 3VO?
[HTC EVO 3D] bobdude5:
Lol i just increase the saturation, contrast and exposure up one in the camera settings :). It takes amazing pictures during the day. Althouhg sometimes its too bright so down the exposure.
[HTC EVO 3D] Negrito:
I'm really enjoying the camera on my 3D.

From the 3rd dimension in wireless...
[HTC EVO 3D] heygrl:
Um yeah.. those all look pretty ****ty compared to the N9's photos.. come on now.

I even tried to take a picture of a close up with my cat.. it took me about 50 tries before it would autofocus properly with my Sensation 4G and detail was still lacking a LOT.. took the same picture with my Vibrant and it easily looked 3x better
[HTC EVO 3D] impactsto:
Agreed the 3D simply takes atrocious pictures. People that posted their pics to compare to the Nokia and think they are "good" need to be checked for a doping violation. I've yet to take or see an unaltered 3vo picture that didn't look like a 2mp phone from three years ago. I'm strongly leaning towards a return at this point (camera, battery life, and random lag the reasons).