yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Nook Color General] gadzooks64:
My first thought when the new Market appeared was, "OMG I hope it works at 160 so I can have both my Market and Google Reader working at the same time!"

And.... so far so good! Woooooooooooooot! :D
[Nook Color General] TheAmazingDave:
SiMi clock doesn't display correctly at 160. :(

It doesn't display correctly at 161, either, but it's worse at 160.

161 leaves a column of pixels unused on the right side in portrait, where the wallpaper shows through the clock's background.

160 makes the clock's background very thick, and overlaps my power button widget in landscape mode.

I've been using 169. This creates the least bit of widget overlap between the clock and power bar, and also makes the clock cover the entire row in portrait. It makes desktop icons a tad blurry, though. Everything else displays fine.
[Nook Color General] DiDGR8:
Sorry to burst your balloon. After a couple of reboots, My apps disappears (just like before).:rolleyes:
[HTC Wildfire S] cmoe:
Hi there,

I am searching for a cradle for the Wildfire S but every cradle I found was like "i put my phone in and then have to plug in a seperate cable to the power connector of my phone". Though this cable is integrated in the cradle it looks ugly and is far away from a simple "plugin-plugout"

Do you know a cradle without such a cable but still with function of charging? I have something in my mind, where you can plug the phone in from the right side instead from above.

Thanks a lot,

cmoe
[HTC Wildfire S] Hakim Rahman:
You have to survey to http://www.pdashop.be/accessoire/12... assortiment/htc-wildfire-s-silver-white.html
[Galaxy S II General] DJTaurus:
I havent found a similar topic so....

Dont get me wrong but compairing brightness level of GS2 to my previous GS1,colours on GS2 seem a lot darker/grey (they are more natural) and brightness too low....please look below some screenshots of my GS2 and tell me if i am wrong.

Phone Status : KE7 with CF-Root kernel.

All photos taken with 35% brightness level,auto adjust power off and standard background effect.

http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/9021/sc20110610184504.jpg

http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/6003/sc20110610003429.jpg

http://img542.imageshack.us/img542/6624/sc20110610184602.jpg

http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/793/sc20110610184630.jpg

http://img585.imageshack.us/img585/4615/sc20110610184554.jpg

http://img56http://img855.imageshack.us/img855/6959/sc20110610184313.jpg

http://img855.imageshack.us/img855/6959/sc20110610184313.jpg

http://img541.imageshack.us/img541/9846/sc20110610184322.jpg

http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/7455/sc20110610184424.jpg

http://img857.imageshack.us/img857/6179/sc20110610184516.jpg

http://img835.imageshack.us/img835/7098/sc20110610184533.jpg

http://img703.imageshack.us/img703/3323/sc20110610184544.jpg

http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/6471/sc20110610184617.jpg
[Galaxy S II General] Natascha303:
screenshots doesnt help to show what u mean, but i can admit, sgs1 was a bit more bright
[Acer Iconia A500] bruce770641:
I will keep this brief, yesterday I called Acer about a problem I was having with the display. The rep told me I could send it in to be fixed, said it came with a "limited" warranty and that if it could not be fixed a replacement would NOT be offered. WTF?
[Acer Iconia A500] FloatingFatMan:
Well, I don't know about where you come from, but in the EU, this is not legal.
[Acer Iconia A500] bahurd:
You can also file a claim with your credit card (assuming you used one) in many cases. Some of them automatically have 'extended' coverage.

Here's American Express FAQ on the subject; https://www212.americanexpress.com/dsmlive/dsm/dom/us/en/feefreeservices/faqs/buyersassurance_ccsg_faq.do?vgnextoid=977b1f78d2ced010VgnVCM20000012b3ad94RCRD&vgnextchannel=45122012dd5fd010VgnVCM10000084b3ad94RCRD&name=buyersassurance_ccsg_faq&type=intfaq

And Visa; http://usa.visa.com/personal/visa-signature/benefits/warranty-manager.jsp
[Acer Iconia A500] gunnyman:
I think I'm glad I bought the Best Buy Black Tie coverage.
[Acer Iconia A500] Vereynn:
Best I know, damned near any country the only "limit" they can put on replacing during the warranty period is if the damage was user-caused. In the US you should have a lot of state-backed consumer protection laws to help you.
[Acer Iconia A500] bruce770641:
I'm in Houston Texas, I am still in the return period so returning it is no problem. I just wanted to get the word out what In was told by Acer's rep.
[Acer Iconia A500] erica_renee:
misunderstanding

When you talk to support/first tear people. Most whobdo not speak your native language well there can be issues with understanding what the issue at hand is.I know from having Acer even A open products forever.They will repair at there cost defective products.And do so in a Timly manor.If you have a cracked screen your device has been droped or wet.well its not there faltered.if you have rooted the device and you have a bad app or setting /program isue its not there falt.This is how warranty laws are written.I owned a computer/networking repair business for years. Acer is not a bad company.There devices computers are some of the best made. There first tear support might as well be still in diapers.Im sure most all in here would agree

Acer please give me open bootloader and recovery.

YOU OWE US A RECOVERY.

the unlocked bootloader would be a bennefit as well.just do not support people who use it.we can live with that.most in here would never ask for tech support anyway
[XPERIA X8 General] like.no.other87:
Can anyone can upload me thet wallpaper?
[XPERIA X8 General] mcpaddington:
Download here: http://www.mediafire.com/?csyzcvclg8c3y3z
[G Tablet General] roebeet:
1800 devices were sold this week, and I would expect that a good portion of those users will be headed here.

Again, this is just an early report from one user who just got their device, so it could be a one-off. But I would go on the assumption that they are all getting 4349, to play it safe.

To the moderators:

I would highly recommend that the development area be altered ASAP to break up the 1.1 and 1.2 ROMs. I would also recommend that a disclaimer be added to all 1.1 ROMs, including anything CM7 based, that specific steps need to be taken if a 4349 user attempts to use these ROMs. I have been asking for this since April, and I am respectively asking again.

Again, this could just be a one-off user with 4349. But given that one Woot! user has it, and new TigerDirect users have 4349 as well gives me the impression that this could be the norm for all new devices. And I think it's in XDA's best interests to prepare the development site accordingly, given what we know about 1.1 down-leveling.

To the 1.1 devs / modders:

Same request. From someone who had the opposite occur with TNT Lite 5, this is a potentially devastating situation if these users flash your 1.1 based ROM.

To new Woot! users:

You should read this first, please: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1035983 Don't jump into modding until you have confirmed what stock version you have, please.
[G Tablet General] brookfield:
I agree, If we can prevent a user from flashing the wrong ROM due to their bootloader, we will save many users from needless grief and reduce the number of posts for help to those who really need it.

Roebeet, sure glad to see you back posting and helping...
[G Tablet General] roebeet:
I think I picked the right week to do so. :D
[G Tablet General] jerdog:
This will be the role of the posters of the ROMs/MODs to delineate which bootloader is used, as well as to provide the appropriate disclaimers, etc.

At the end of the day, XDA is a developer site - and all action taken is at your own risk and decision. If users are not willing to fully research their choices the responsibility falls on them for whatever happens. There will be people who help out of the goodness of their heart - but not their responsibility if something fails like the user was warned it would.
[G Tablet General] brettdwagner:
Agreed. The SD development sections are much easier to navigate after being segregated into 1.1 and 1.2
[G Tablet General] brettdwagner:
Isn't this a pretty basic usability issue? This would help new users, but more fundamentally it's just good organization, no?
[G Tablet General] Tostino:
I kinda disagree with this statement. In other sub-forums on XDA, they require all posts in the dev section to follow guidelines on the title at the very least. Simply requiring that all posts in that section be classified the same way is all that is needed (with all the disclaimers and everything).

Example:

[Rom][1.2BL] Uber Fake Rom!!1?! (Now with extra frosted flakes) - [1.0 - 6/10/11)
[G Tablet General] jerdog:
And that's a good statement - if you notice those posting actual development ROMs/MODs already follow this as a rule of thumb. But it is not an XDA requirement. It has been suggested to Devs that they follow this anyways.
[G Tablet General] MechAniX.one:
Clean up on "Isle 9" please. I think being structured by bootloader is a great idea. Especially since there are projects now other then Android being worked on. And in the future when Windows 8 is released.
[G Tablet General] ptgptg:
Why not simply break out the ROM section, rather than put more of the onus on the developers? The developers already have enough to do with developing and will in all likelihood already advise which bootloader to use. Make it a little easier for them.

We all know that what we do is at our own risk; all that is being asked is to break the ROM section into a 1.1 and 1.2 subforum.
[G Tablet General] flipovich:
I disagree. The breaking into a 1.1 and a 1.2 sub-forum of the development section seems pretty much critical to avoid any unnecessary headache for XDA gTab users. Saying what you said above is like throwing a 10 year old behind the wheel of a car and saying: "You accept the risks of your own actions, so go ahead and start driving and we'll see where this leads us."

You wouldn't do that under any circumstance, so you provide "buffers" (training, mentorship, test driving, books, etc) which in our case would be the sub-forums separating boot loader types to attempt to put forth a friendly effort to help users avoid a headache.

The sub-forums would look something like this:

Android Development:

General Development (CWM, radios, tools, app dev, etc)

1.1 Bootloader Development (all 1.1 based kernels, ROMs, and misc.)

1.2 Bootloader Development (all 1.1 based kernels, ROMs, and misc.)

Not putting forth the effort to at least provide a somewhat protected atmosphere for the XDA gTab users is negligence. I have been a member of the XDA community in an observer/user fashion for much longer than my membership reflects. From my experience with XDA, I have noticed a trend on the gTab community in more recent times that is not reflected on the other device forums I have utilized (HD2, Tilt, Tilt2, G2, G1, MyTouch, and a few more that I cannot remember). The vast majority of those kept higher and more enforced standards than the gTab forums have lately, but still looked out for the users by putting certain "buffers" and preventative measures into place to try to keep users from messing up their pricey hardware due to negligence.

Yes, negligence on the user's part is their fault by not following some instructions laid out for them, but it doesn't mean that the leadership can't at a minimum provide some buffers out of a good faith gesture. I hope you don't take this in a disrespectful way or anything, just voicing my observation on things I've seen over the past few months and figured as the gTab moderator (even though you're selling yours), you'd probably want to know what the community members of your device forum are observing.

Thanks for your hard work, but this is something that's inevitable and should not be avoided or curtailed for a later date.
[G Tablet General] goodintentions:
No offense, but speaking as a non-1337 who's been dealing with 1337s for years, this post sounds like the typical 1337 attitude.

Dividing up the development section into 1.1 and 1.2 will save many headaches. Noone is here to stroke anyone's ego as a 1337. We're just trying to make the process go as smoothly as possible here.
[G Tablet General] jerdog:
We're not talking about putting people behind a car. We're talking about people accessing a forum that is for development. Any usage of the forum and the developed solutions presented is at your own risk.

This is not a precedent at XDA nor would it be approved. There is some segmentation under a device but that is by OS - not by a bootloader in an OS.

Not taken as disrespectful at all. And whether or not I own the device has nothing to do with the level of effort put into the forum. It is not the role of a moderator to police the information and provide checks and balances for the users. It is the role of the developer or poster to do that. Moderators are here to keep threads on topic, keep users from trolling, cleanup spam, etc.

Developers should mark their projects as to the relevance for the user - i.e. [BL1.2] or whatever. It's important for users to be held responsible for their actions and we are a development community - not a hand-holding community.

It is also the role of users to report posts that they see as problematic to the OP and if the OP doesn't make changes then you can bring the moderators in to assist as appropriate. It's also the role of users to help keep things sorted by reporting posts that need moved elsewhere, etc. and to report those who are abusive so that they can be actioned.
[G Tablet General] roebeet:
My goal was not to ruffle feathers. I'm just stating my concerns and suggestions, whether they are feasible or not.

The newer 1.2 ROMs here on XDA seem to add these differences to their titles and first posts (as mentioned), but my concern is the older 1.1 ROMs, especially ones that were created before this new branch was released. For example, some of the CM7 based ROMs, and even CM7 itself, are not safe to use if you are flashing directly from 4349 stock. And I've also made suggestions in the Cyanagenmod forums, for the same reasons.
[G Tablet General] jerdog:
And I appreciate the suggestions and involvement. Thanks!
[G Tablet General] Sily_Rabit:
Thanks

I never heard of the g tablet before this week, but the TD Ebay deal was too good to pass up. I got one with 1.2-4349 on it. First thing I did was downgrade it thanks to the heads up info from this forum. With some reading was also able to put Veganginger on it. First attempt, it locked it up when rebooting after a successful install. But again, this forum was right on top of it. I followed the info for using nvflash and got back to a stock rom, ran clockwork again and installed Vegan no problem.

Not much to comment on the tablet itself yet, it just arrived yesterday, but so far its been fun just making the updates.

Just wanted to say thanks for all the info.
[G Tablet General] willverduzco:
I've read through this thread and I do not believe a separate sub-forum is necessary. As such, I am closing this thread before the discussion becomes out of hand.

The differences between the Gtab versions lie in software alone. There is currently a method available to revert to 1.1 using nvflash in order to regain ROM compatibility with 1.1 ROMs. This, coupled with a simple warning as to which bootloader is compatible will ensure that everyone is satisfied.

In the past, we have only given separate development sub-forums for devices where a revision change is tied to a physical hardware change. As this is simply a (reversible) software difference, Jerdog has taken the correct approach by suggesting that the developers and moderators delineate which ROMs are compatible with which bootloaders.

Will Verduzco

XDA Senior Moderation Team
[Galaxy S I9000 General] Nightwish sgsl:
Help me please, i can't load charges..when i want to, appears "MMI code started" and then appears "Reject"...what to do?:(:confused:
[Galaxy S I9000 General] Nightwish sgsl:
And if i dont root my phone can i install hd games of gameloft and play?? and how to install?i have downloded files to Computer...:confused:
[Eee Pad Transformer Themes and Apps] combat goofwing:
Anyone recommended a good one for the e pad

ASUS TRANSFORMER PRIMED
[Galaxy Tab Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] css00083:
HELP~!!!! I bought a galaxy tab in Australia and it was unlocked. Then when I saw the forum post for firmware

It was the JJ3 version and download the Australian version P1000NUBJM2. I followed the step except I loaded the pit file inside the .tar instead of the P1_20100909.pit.

I unchecked the repartition button and it passed the installation and green button lights up. But my tab didn't restart after that !!! It's now in black screen!!!! Help~~~!!!

But it seems can connect to computer as i replug the tab, kies pops up and odin still works with the yellow ID:COM box.

And I didn't root it before flashing firmware, is it the reason? and how can i get it back to original factory setting??
[Galaxy Tab Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] DarkPal:
First Calm down and Kindly Post the questions in appropriate forum Q/A forum is for questions

Second A detectable tab in ODIN and Kies is most likely NOT BRICKED

Third Read the guide for flashing your appropriate firmware before flashing it (or anything really). If you feel you are not able to do that take the Tab to someone who can and he/she can fix it for you. This is important if you feel you can't do it DO NOT DO IT.

Make sure your tab is well charged (charged fully is best).

Fire up ODIN.

Use the CORRECT PIT file for you firmware (each firmware has its own PIT file). Put the PIT file in the PIT box and check repartition and by default the other 2 boxes will be checked (DO NOT TOUCH ANYTHING ELSE).

Load the firmware PDA PHONE and CSC (or if its a single tar file load it in PDA). Start flashing.

Finally before doing all the I SUGGEST YOU SEARCH AROUND. You will find many guides that can get you out of this situation.
[Galaxy Tab Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] css00083:
My tab is not rooted, but odin showed a successful box. It just didn't restart.

Is it because I didn't root? How can I recover from the update process?
[Galaxy S II Themes and Apps] hani1980:
Hi

this is som mods i created for the [ROM] madmack's 1.4 (KE7 - RTL + Arabic support)

1- what is the mods:

Added DSP Manager

Added Extended Power menu

Added CWM Package

CRT Screen-Off Animation

Overscroll glow

Phone.apk without increasing ring

Hacked Camera.APK for better audio quality, usage with any battery life!

GTalk 1.3 with Video

2- how to install

first download this file

http://www.multiupload.com/OALWNUOPUP

and put is it into your internal sd

2nd install this kernel from http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1103399

and flash it with Odin

3 go to your CWM recovery mod

Install zip from Sdcard

choose zip from sdcard

MedMac Rom 1.4 moded by DR.AKRIM.zip

yes - install MedMac Rom 1.4 moded by DR.AKRIM.zip

Go Back then Reboot system now

fin

thanks for all members and my best friend MedMac
[Galaxy S II Themes and Apps] KukurikU:
i am very interested in the RTL mode but i am still on the original ROM and rooted. your mode is only for the madmack's ROM?
[Galaxy S II Themes and Apps] hani1980:
take this file run it form the recovery this will arabize any rom with out changing any thing in any rom

http://www.multiupload.com/AUS0SYTAFO

thanks
[Galaxy S II Themes and Apps] awcabdou:
Hii all of you!! wwhy both of files doesn't work for my SGSII. It makes me stuck at the boot logo. i run a stock KE7CF-rooted. I'm from tunisia and i need only a simple file to patch to get only arabic without dsp manager and other mods. Thank you guys ;) and Good luck for this work
[Galaxy S II Themes and Apps] awcabdou:
Can you help Me please? I want to have all parts of this MOD expect the over-scroll glow. Can you help Me please? Or can you provide me a file to flash. Thank you. :)

Best Regards
[Galaxy S II Themes and Apps] tamarian:
Thanks, works great!
[Galaxy S II Themes and Apps] KukurikU:
Thank You! I have already perfect Hebrew (RTL, numbers...etc) with the help of the attached files. being rooted and using Root Explorer all i had to do is to copy and overwrite the original ones (first i did a copy of the originals and a backup ;)). maybe same files with yours??

anybody interested feel free to try them.

http://www.multiupload.com/GWBW62M0B2
[Galaxy S II Themes and Apps] TAEL:
Which ROM you are using? Is it needed to be deodexed or not?
[Galaxy S II Themes and Apps] KukurikU:
i am using lite'ning ROM:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1095274 in madmack's blog (you can find his ROM in this forum) the deodexed appear as a must:

http://blog.devasque.com/?page_id=11#english

i didn't use his method, i only copied the files.

i am not even sure that this are the exactly same files. i got my files from an Israelian forum (if you know Hebrew i can send you the link). from the forum i understood that madmack's ROM is Arabic supported already and that in lite'ning ROM the files should be applied (copied).

hope i helped.

​
[Gen8 Android Development] Lenn:
Hey there:)

The Hacker Bubu just released the Gen8 Boot Menu (Gen7 too:D)

He is part of the OpenAos Archos Hacker/Modder Community:)

You need to install the SDE and install a kind of Rom/Custom Firmware on your Archos Gen8 Device and after that you have the Boot Menu:)

This allow us to boot multible Os like Android Urukdroid Angström Chromium Os Cyanogen...:)

At the moment the website is offline, dont know why..:D

but the website is: http://www.openaos.org ;)

What do you think? Do you think this gona help us? Do you'll install it?

Let me know:)

Thanks:

Charbax <<The Archos Head:D>> for released the info on his page:)

I think the 2 biggest Archos communitys "Xda (Archos Section)" and "OpenAos" should work more hand-in-hand, shouldnt they?:)

More Developers = Better Roms:) (And other stuff:D)

Greetz & Thankz,

Lenn
[Gen8 Android Development] marcusmarcus:
What's the difference between this boot menu and the boot menu in the SDE? SDE allows you to boot between stock firmware and 1 other OS. Does this other boot menu allow you to boot between more than 2 at a time?
[Gen8 Android Development] sibere:
Supposed to be... But I haven't been able to reach openaos website yet ... down or too busy ?
[Gen8 Android Development] Lenn:
I think too busy, because right after Charbax post this openaos.org was down:D

Do you'll test it?;):)
[Gen8 Android Development] sibere:
Sure I will if I have enough time!
[Gen8 Android Development] divx118:
You can boot multiple rootfs with multiboot, but it all uses the same kernel to boot those.

The kernel is the one from archos gpl with some adjustments and available on gitorious.

There will also be the initramfs sources.

https://gitorious.org/archos-buildroots/gen8-kernel

https://gitorious.org/archos-buildroots/gen8

Maurice :cool:
[Gen8 Android Development] sibere:
Sounds good as we are using this kernel for Uruk :)

I would like to try it just in case I want to try booting debian or openAOS or even a testbuild of cyanogenmod ;)
[Gen8 Android Development] marcusmarcus:
If this boot menu means we can get Cyanogenmod on our Archos, I would be overjoyed.
[Gen8 Android Development] Lenn:
It dont bring us CyanogenMod:D

But i make things easier:) and faster:)

Thanks to divx118 for the testing and the fotos:);)

Sibere, let us ask sauron when hes online about this:)
[Gen8 Android Development] rplc790222:
Ok, that would be great to see a multiboot on our systems, but will be there any problem installing it after have installed urukdroid?, or will be needed a fresh intall of everything? ... and in other hand this multiboot will allow us to install ubuntu (that would be great)?
[Gen8 Android Development] Lenn:
I think it needs a fresh install,unfortunality..

to ubuntu:

It will help to do this, because with that you can have more than 2 os's:);)
[Gen8 Android Development] rplc790222:
ok

2 OS's ... that would be awesome, I wouldn't mind to format my archos an reinstall all over again if it would work like that, I would love to have the android stock os, Urukdroid and Ubuntu:D