[Thunderbolt General] Sub-Standard:
You are obviously a borred teenager with little to no knowledge regarding basic law.... or reasoning, or reading comprehension......Here, I'll simplify it for your simple mind.

Say your step-father buys you a 2009 Pontiac Prius from your local used car dealer for you to drive back forth from school & your part time job at Burger King... upon the purchas he signs a contractual agreement stating that he will pay the used car dealer a minimum monthly payment of $250.00 each month for 60 months (that's five years so you don't have to use your calculator from algebra class).

Say after 6 months, the used car dealer decides he wants to increase his revenue by charging more for your step-dad's prius. So he calls up your step-dad & says that either he has to start paying $300.00/month for the remainder of the contract (put away your calculator, that's 54 months). He tells your step-father that if he doesn't wish to pay the additional price, then he must allow the car to be repo'ed.

If the contract didn't specifically state that the used car dealer reserved the right to adjust the purchase price then a court of law would not make your step-daddy turn over the car. Instead, since the contract stated a specific price, instead of being allowed to break contract, the judge would make the used car dealer honor the original price agreed upon (along with paying for court cost).

On the otherhand with verizon wireless, the attorney that wrote the contractual agreement (the one that your step-father signed when adding a line for you incase you wern't home by curfew) added a clause stating that they reserve the right to change the terms of contract (also know as breaking or breaching contract). All this does is allow them to let/force you out of the contract, as opposed to being stuck in a contract with you that they don't wish to remain in for the remainder of the contract period. Put shortly, verizon wireless added a clause allowing them to breach/break their own contract terms without being forced to stick to it for the remainder of the contract terms.

Beyond the fact that everyone who has read the contract is aware the Verizon Wireless legally has the option of changing prices mid-contract, I don't think that you are grasping the obvious concept that there probably isn't a single person on this forum that predicts that Verizon Wireless would actually force people out of contract in order to gain a few more dollars per month from the ones that decide to stay with them and pay the higher monthly data rate instead of cancelling the contract. Therefor, there isn't anything worth you arguing on this topic. I think most people are refering to "Grandfathering" as what Verizon chooses to do with customers accounts AFTER the original contract is expired.

If this is still confusing, then I suggest instead of continuing to pretend that you understand law and trying to argue, you simply do some research, or just give up. I understand that you are trying to drive up your post count and attempting to make yourself look smart on the internet, because you figure you have a better chance here than in reality; however with every post you are just proving more and more your childish stobborn ignoance of reading comprehension and basic law. There comes a point when it's best to stop digging.

Two similar (hopefully helpful) quotes for you:

It's best to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt. -George Eliot

Even a fool, when he holdeth his peace, is counted wise: And he that shutteth his lips is esteemed a man of understanding. -Proverbs 17:28.