yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Eee Pad Transformer Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Hessinger:
That's slightly annoying. I would like to use this as my on the road development machine. I'm working on my own port of VIM right now but this spacebar problem is damn annoying. Hopefully ASUS can make the spacebar slightly more sensitive in a firmware update.
[Eee Pad Transformer Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] bleclair:
Yeah, I agree. I've got the disconnect issue and I'm waiting on the official update, but even using it a little was frustrating.

I can type pretty fast and I'd look back and see words strung together.
[Eee Pad Transformer Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] doronster195:
My keyboard/spacebar work just fine. Even if pressed on the edge, and the feel is the same as with all the other keys.
[Eee Pad Transformer Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] bleclair:
Thanks, guess I'll have to open a ticket with Asus.
[Eee Pad Transformer Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Hessinger:
Do you have the disconnect, freezing issues? I'm waiting for a fix for that.
[Eee Pad Transformer Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] gadgetfann:
There's already a fix for this, but it is in beta-testing. There are a few threads on here with the details. The fix is working great for me. I've been able to use my keyboard for the first time since I got it with no freezing and no wifi disconnects. The firmware update should be released in a few days to everyone.
[Eee Pad Transformer Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] wynand32:
My spacebar feels and responds just like the other keys, which is to say: it's excellent. I'm probably getting around 60 wpm on the keyboard dock, compared to 80 wpm on a full-size keyboard. I'm sure with practice that will improve.
[Galaxy S II General] jonkrav:
I have noticed that when using the supplied earphones I can hear static background noise when I scroll through menus and buttons while music is playing. This only happens when music is activated and I can hear a low annoying fuzzy static that gets louder the more I scroll for example.

I can barely hear it when I put on headphones but can with earphones, seems quite strange wonder if anyone else experiences the same thing?
[Galaxy S II General] jonkrav:
No one? Just try it, turn the volume down while listening to music then go to home screen and scroll left constantly or right and the hissing noise will get louder.

Audio chip or whatever must be quite crappy.
[Galaxy S II General] jonkrav:
Restarted phone and can't seem to hear it now. Strange.
[Galaxy S II General] bigmo7:
I'm glad that by talking to your self you've managed to fix this problem. ;)
[Galaxy S II General] jonkrav:
I spoke to myself to soon! Its back and I suspect it has something to do with the wifi sharing. As I activated kies air, uploaded a song, listened to song and hissing is back! argh.
[Galaxy S II General] bigmo7:
Try force stopping it? I've frozen most Samsung apps but even before then I had no problems at all with something like this tbh...although I don't use the stock music player. :o
[Galaxy S II General] DSF:
I have annoying static background noise while using earphones, it can be better heard whilr using the phone when no music is playing.

This is a general issue or isolated cause?
[Galaxy S II General] tgg12:
I have this!!! I seem to get possibly some kind of audible distortion just before i play a song, and then when i pause the song and touch the screen it makes the weird static noise (and possibly when the song is playing as well, but its less identifiable). For me this noise only lasts for about 5 seconds after i have paused it and then stops. And yes, it also seems to be louder in earphones than headphones.

HAVE YOU FOUND A FIX? Firmware upgrades? Sent it back and got a replacement? what did you guys do? Let me know, thanks.
[Galaxy S II General] branko.savic:
Could it be evp?
[Galaxy S II General] IakobosJ:
I installed the Backslash Kernel and THEN noticed this, rebooted and it went.

It came back a while after. I also unplugged the headphones with the music app running and the phone rebooted.

Re-flashed the CF-Root KG1 Kernel and it went away, not had any 'noise' or reboots since :/
[Galaxy S II General] tgg12:
I got a replacement from orange as this issue was too distracting. My replacement has just come, but exactly the same 'static noise while and after listening to music' issue is still here!!! Is this really what its like for everyone but people don't bother saying?

PDA: I9100BVKE2

PHONE: I9100BVKE2

CSC: I9100ORAKE2

BUILD INFO : Wed May 11 22:56:39

KERNAL VERSION: 2.6.35.7-I9100BVKE2-CL195878root@DELL101 #2

On my last phone i tried flashing to generic KE7 AND KF3 (using odin). Both seemed to make the sound last for not as long after i pause the music, but did not solve the issue. Will rooting the phone, using different kernals and whatnot fix this? Could it be a dodgy batch of phones from orange? (I have no knowledge of what rooting and kernals actually is, let alone what ones i should use)
[Galaxy S II General] Trentors:
I have also experienced this. It seems the screen is the problem since the noise is gone when the screen is off.

What headphones are you using?
[Galaxy S II General] tgg12:
I have used the supplied headphones, but i have also tried other headphones as well. All seem to give the same sound but possibly at varying levels of volume. Do you still have the problem?
[Galaxy S II General] Trentors:
I use the Sennheiser CX300 II and I do not experience it any longer.

It depends on the impedance of the headphones. If the impedance is 16 ohm I cannot hear it but on 12 ohm headphones it is pretty obvious (but they are able to play louder).

I have not tried the supplied ones myself because they ALWAYS sound awful but if you had a specific name for a proper headphone you have tried, you can easily find their impedance on the internet.
[Galaxy S II General] tgg12:
Hmm well i have tried my creative EP-630 headphones which have impedance of 16 Ohm and i can still hear the noise. I have used many terrible headphones on terrible 'mp3 players' over the years and i have never experienced this, so i don't see why i should now go out and buy some new headphones. Although if you are really saying that the Sennheiser CX300 II headphones completely cured your problem then it might be worth it? Was your problem exactly the same as the one i described? Cheers.
[Galaxy S II General] JuniorGG:
It's obviously a problem of the audio amp picking up electrical noise from the other components of the device. I'm skeptic that anything can be done to solve it.

I also can hear some faint background noise on mine when scroling the screen and using memory, but anyway it's very faint... not enough to bother even in quiet environments.
[Galaxy S II General] Dr Tone:
I have to agree, it's bad shielding in the design. Something we will all have to live with.

I notice it most between songs when listening to music. Each songs starts with a little blast of noise.
[Galaxy S II General] tgg12:
Hmmm well i've heard that with certain kernals it is not there. Also for me, simply changing to different stock firmware reduced the time that the static sound lasts after i pause a song, so surely that can mean it can be stopped altogether. Im not prepared to give up on this (yet).

I would be grateful for other information and reports from other people about this issue, even simply if you don't have it. :/
[Galaxy S II General] tgg12:
...anyone?
[Galaxy S II General] rothariger:
i have this problem too...

but i have found that it does with some earphones... i guess its a matter of shielding, as posted before.
[Atrix 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] impruv:
Hey, I have gingerbreak'd, gladenabled, and used titanium backup to freeze most if not all motoblur services as well as at&t services.

I think I'm ready to install gingerblur/greyblur. Would I have to unfreeze these or can I go ahead and just follow the tutorial to install these roms.

Thanks!
[Android Themes] kgill7:
Ok this is really a WIP, called TheJoker, tell me what you think and what to change/add:

**The smile is the signal,the lines coming out of the smile, and the lil joker to the left is for 3g still gotta add the incoming and outgoing arrows, and the spiraling joker hat is the battery**

Hey Guys, this is a StormTrooper CM7 theme i am making, it is still in production, i just wanted to give you guys a preview.

Screens:

Here is a another theme idea that i have, based on ice cream:rolleyes::

Screens:

WHAT DO YOU GUYS THINK????

**If you like my themes, please consider donating/to help support the projects, Thank You**
[Android Themes] schneidebrett:
Well, not that into Starwars but for real fans a must have i'd say :D

BTW: That Wallpaper is quite nice. Can you give me a hint where to find it?
[Android Themes] kgill7:
thanks for your input and here's the link for the wallpaper:

http://i679.photobucket.com/albums/vv155/thebigkahuna91/Random/StormtrooperWallpaper.png
[Android Themes] jags_the1:
nice...this is something different ... i am sure it will be acknowledged.
[Android Themes] kgill7:
thanks man!
[Android Themes] twister99403:
Not a big fan of starwars myself but if I was this would be the "cream of the crop" looks nice for what it is, good work :D
[Android Themes] kgill7:
thank you for sharing =)
[Android Themes] twister99403:
No problem, I appreciate quality work when I see it :)

I definitely think your good enough to make a lot of good themes like maybe a Halo/red vs blue theme? :D haha
[Android Themes] kgill7:
lol haha fasho, give me a couple of ideas for that, like tha icons to use in the status bar
[Android Themes] mbh87:
would you mind hooking me up with your signal icon? ive been working on something for personal use. i used boba fett as my 4G icon
[Android Themes] kgill7:
Original op updated check it out ^^^^^^^^^ =d
[Android Themes] kgill7:
Check it out in the op, wip joker theme, what you think?
[Android Themes] defjef123:
My fav is the storm trooper but I would use them all. Even the vida ice cream
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] JWhipple:
I personally think they should - too easy to pick a ROM from the wrong phone and brick your shiny toy!
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] piaa_nissan:
At the very least a subforum within the Nexus umbrella
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] matt2053:
There's like 12 threads about this now.
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tailsthecat3:
I hate to participate and bump this to the top but - enough of these idiotic threads. A 4G subforum is unneeded
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] JWhipple:
That's your opinion, which may not reflect that of others!
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jnemesh:
subthread needed!

I vote FOR a separate thread or subthread...would make it much easier as they are NOT the same phone and require different ROMs.
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] NYYFan325:
Is it REALLY REALLY that hard to just put [CDMA] or [NS4G] in front of the ROM that is for the 4G only? Are we really THAT lazy that we need a forum so we don't have to spend 5-10 seconds reading?

I realize that the dev's have been putting something in front, I'm just stating that it's easy and doesn't require a separate section if that standard is followed.
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] popox:
maybe always using tag in thread subject. just for sure..
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] info[]box1:
If the touch pro 2 has separate sections, than the nexus s should and for the same reason which is obvious. Its a no brain-er..
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] maconu:
I'm all for a separate section. Trusting that all posts would contain [NS4G] or [CDMA] is wishfull thinking. Make a separate section and the problem is solved.

It is a different phone after all..
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TubeShaped:
+++ 10chars
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zephiK:
+1 the only section that is different is the Developer forums. Everything else is the same, if anything you'd be losing a large % of the Nexus community to your own forum.

Nexus S: Everybody else except Sprint.

Nexus S 4G: Sprint only.

You do the math. World vs. Sprint 4G

Jeez... its like the civil war all over where they want to have their own territory and break from the union.

It's also even possible that ROMs could have dual support for NS and NS4G. Relax. Just give it time.

We Nexus S users (non-4G) aren't complaining about NS4G ROMs going up on the Developer section. We're one big happy family, stop trying to be special and moving onto your own section where you're going to isolate the community in terms of NS General/NS Q&A/NS Apps&Themes and only have small number of users where you eventually just end up coming back here because your "NS4G" forum doesn't have as much people.
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] crasch:
I agree with zephiK.

There should be at least a separate developer forum. Everything else is pretty much the same.
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rougegoat:
It is also possible that the sun will rise in the west. So far, it hasn't.

Can you name any roms that work for both? I have yet to find one. Is this just due to radios or is this wimax related? If it's just radios, getting every dev to package them separately seems a logical choice, but unrealistic considering.

Sent from my Nexus S 4G "Lore"
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ghost010:
oh for the love of god!!

thats just pure lazynes!!!

go read what the op/rom developer says in the description of the rom.

dont go the lazy rout and just push it on your nexus.

your the problem! not the forum.

your just to lazy to READ!

i really like allot of people here.

but these thing's and such stupid argument's/questions/opinions are what pisses me off.

stop being lazy!

dont like how XDA is? go make your own forum.

[KERNEL]Netarchy Nexus for NS + NS4G (15-May-2011) Stable: 1.3.0.12 Testing: 1.3.1

not a rom,but it is a kernel that supports both.
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] gdm320:
From my standpoint as a relatively newer user, I'd have to agree that separating this into sub-forums would be much easier to follow than the current layout especially on XDA Mobile.
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] wild1z:
I voted yes but...

I would say the TAG's would make it more searchable/sortable. If the goal of XDA staff is to keep all of us "NexSicans" under one happy roof this would be the fastest and easiest routes.

I have mod/admin experience on another unrelated forum and I can tell you these guys have a big job moderating already, so adding a sub section and finding harmony is not a fast and easy decision. So I can appreciate whatever decision you can all agree on to give your staff some relief.

From the Sprint users point of view, we would feel really welcomed to the family if the current Nexus S forum would also include the 4G title. ;)
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] judoka209:
Or people could just read. Crazy I know. No subforum needed.
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] keclarke:
Yep no need IMO
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zephiK:
No body has even said the sun will rise in the west. Did I ever say any ROMs are both compatible at this given time? No. Is it possible? Maybe. It's too early to draw conclusions but koush is doing work on getting CM7 to work for the NS4G.

Sorry but regardless of whatever forum you're on for XDA. Flashing a ROM is to the user's responsibility, not the OP. There's no body to blame but yourselves.

I still stick by my point about NS4G and NS. I don't understand why you want to separate the community. The analogy for the "Civil War" about the Union & Confederacy fits perfectly. Don't know why you want to separate apart. It takes a few seconds to read if its a NS and NS4G ROM.
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Rimmir:
I am in favor of creating a subforum, or at least having ROM developers include the radios for both the regular Nexus S and the Nexus S 4G along with their ROMs.

Just my two cents.
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kijp15:
Ha. I agree.
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] spydersly:
YES YES YES

I agree
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] AllGamer:
there are a few ROMs that works in both GSM / CDMA because they only change the PDA part of the phone and not the radio

you just need to be careful what to flash, and read what is included in the ROM before you flash it
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mkzbdroid:
just wanted to ask a question about voltage control. I dont have much interest in OC or OV but would like to know if I need to change any settings in there to closely mirror the stock kernel? are they already set to a stock setting? I would rather not torch my fascinate and just let it run at what sammy designed it for....
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] vi3tboiii54:
the settings should be at stock but to be sure check if its at 1000 MHZ limit and none of the frequencies are undervolted as in they all show 0 mv.
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] vlucchetti:
I thought there was a slight uv to the kernel, or am I confusing it with commavolt?
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] vi3tboiii54:
Yeah comavolt is undervolted by 75mv. I just flashed 1.3 OTB and when i went to voltage control app 100-1000 MHZ were checked off and all of them were at 0 mv to begin with.
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] noyha:
I have a question, if you are coming from Comm Rom 1.3, what link do you download to flash comavolt?
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mellen_hed:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1011578

This should get you what you want, or you could just use voltage control to drop everything from 1000mhz down to -75mhz
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] vlucchetti:
I liked comavolt for sc 292, but like the otb 1.4 built in with kangbag 1.3. The more I play the more I find the basic settings giving me good battery life and zip. YMMV.
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] noyha:
Thank you. So you drop 1000, 900, 800, etc to -75. Which result better the OTB or Comavolt?
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] vi3tboiii54:
Your results may vary ive tried comavolt in the past with SC 2.9.2 and had no problems what so ever. Now with com ROM im running OTB kernel with no problems after settling on the ideal settings in voltage control. If you would like to go through trial and error to get the most out of your battery life go with OTB if you want the basic reliable one go with comavolt.
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] noyha:
Thank you. I am going to check the battery life and try different setting for few days, and if it is bad or uncomfortable I will try comavolt.
[Fascinate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] vlucchetti:
I have to think there was a valid reason for the devs choosing OTB 1.4 over comavolt.
[G Tablet General] brainyjd:
There is a semi working port of honeycomb for the g-tablet available from the below link. I looked through the threads and could find no mention of this.

http://rom-honeycomb-for-gtab-12.com/
[G Tablet General] jetguy35:
Most of the threads regarding this are in the G tablet General forum...
[G Tablet General] aasoror:
You need to look harder.

The thing is, because its not being developed/released on xda its not mentioned in the Development section.
[G Tablet General] brainyjd:
sorry - It makes sense that this is not in the dev thread

It makes sense that this is not in the dev thread but it is big news and I skim for new post every day in the dev section and did not see any. Sorry I wish I could delete this post.
[G Tablet General] y2k-inc:
It's actually still in ALPHA not Beta :)
[G Tablet General] theimpaler747:
Not development. Moved to general.
[G Tablet General] jashiver22:
It's here, and looks great but some features dont work.. still great

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1065220
[G Tablet General] nunjabusiness:
I'm curious about this since the project obviously IS development, but is being moved to General every time a thread references it.

Is this happening because Roebeet is now, for some reason no one has shared, persona non grata around here?

I mean, I guess it makes sense if he is no longer part of the XDA "family" but it still seems kind of silly.
[G Tablet General] Synman:
I believe it is because the DEVELOPMENT is happening elsewhere.
[G Tablet General] tcrews:
It's not that at all..

Development is for the actual development of something and by the developer of that something, not the discussion of things being developed elsewhere regardless of who is developing it.

A good example.....CM7, the primary source tree for all Gingerbread built ROMs on the Gtablet is discussed in General as well because CyanogenMod is not posting their development and issues....it's others just talking about it.

The easiest way to think of it is that the development forum section is for a developer to post on their work and get feedback.

If it's not your work and you aren't doing the "developing" on it.....post it in General.
[G Tablet General] goodintentions:
This really makes me want to punch whoever that drove roebeet away. Seriously, the guy is as dedicated as you can expect any dev who's doing this out of pure hobbyist enthusiasm.

The guy actually spent his valuable time to give us honeycream. Whoever that accused roebeet of any ill intention and effectively drove him away, shame on you. You should go and buy an ipad and leave us gtabbers alone.
[G Tablet General] Oozura:
When you think about it viewsonic made this all possible by releasing the 1.2 bl. In the end they have given us honey creams...

The honey comb port is from another device that uses a compatible or similar bl.

Roebeet is simply ironing out the gtab specific bugs. But therew are numerous bugs, so his work is much appreciated.

I definitely hate following the development on an outside site from xda. Because I love this community. But it is what it is.
[G Tablet General] asankasl:
Well said goodintentions !!

I don't agree with some of your posts,

but this one I can't agree more.
[G Tablet General] edirector:
You can find him on slate droid and he is working on honeycomb.
[G Tablet General] Zaphod-Beeblebrox:
Really Jerdog?

I think you take this too far. Just being a jerk now.

I guess you will be removing all links to CM7 huh? Isn't that another tablet/phone/forum site? Those DEV's don't post/host their projects here.

I've never really taken sides in this little spat, but I think this is childish.

It's not like this is just one of many CM7 derivatives. It's the only bootable HC image I know of for the G-tab at this moment. Whatever flaws, issues, malfunctions it may have, many in these forums would like to play around.
[G Tablet General] Synman:
This is an amazing rom for an alpha!
[G Tablet General] aasoror:
Don't worry its all over the General section right now :p

XDA is merely reaping what some of its members/mods have planted (see: roebeet vs. XDA regarding 1.2 bl), and the more they continue to make a big issue about it the more the members will be trafficking and directing others traffic outside XDA.

Thats not the issue here (IMHO), the thing is , everyone who wants to try this ROM needs to load 1.2bl, this just proves that 1.2bl was the way to go (as suggested a month or two ago). The 1.1 <-> 1.2 switch just to try honeycomb will drive many users (at one point or another) to keep using the semi-backed, still alpha, HC release to avoid the overhead of the switch (especially given the rate of advances made in the HC port and bricking risk involved in jumping back and forth). Now all the current ROM developers (in clear contradiction to what XDA advocated) will need to either release 1.2 compatible ROMs or risk loss of interest.