yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Xoom Themes and Apps] mdiorio:
I just updated the Nook app on my Xoom. In the updates list, it doesn't mention anything about magazines...however imagine my surprise when I opened the app and see my magazines in the list waiting for me to download them.

Works flawlessly! Screw Zinio for not releasing their app across all devices. I can finally renew my subscriptions via B&N.
[Xoom Themes and Apps] andr0id23:
Nice. I just updated on my Xoom as well, and didn't see this so I haven't even opened the app yet since my update. In the middle of a nandroid backup right now, but gonna check it out as soon as it is done! Thanks for the heads up!
[Xoom Themes and Apps] dubsjw27:
Just updated as well. Magazines look great in landscape!
[Xoom Themes and Apps] Terul:
any chance you could post the apk?
[Xoom Themes and Apps] Khassy:
They look great now, but the bad thing is that now I have to see full page advertisements. Blah. :)
[Xoom Themes and Apps] Zamboniman:
This is awesome. I've been waiting for B&N magazines to be properly supported for a while. Great news!
[Xoom Themes and Apps] subminimal:
looks like the update got rid of the force closes when hitting the back button to leave a book. I prefer nook over kindle app if nothing else for the page animations and smooth transition. Great update and finally get to use the nook app all the time!
[Xoom Themes and Apps] Khassy:
My only wish now is that they will make a widget that shows some of the books you have downloaded so you can scroll through them, like the Youtube widget.
[Xoom Themes and Apps] krickett:
Very nice update, but epub book covers won't show up in the library. :( Anyone know of a way to fix this?
[Xoom Themes and Apps] SlCKB0Y:
Can someone post the apk please? :)
[Xoom Themes and Apps] CSGirl:
This makes me really happy. :D
[Xoom Themes and Apps] konman795:
The new app looks great, seems they updated the user interface for tablets too finally :D
[Xoom Themes and Apps] KidJoe:
Too bad it doesn't support "read to me" books... still need the stock NookColor for that.
[Xoom Themes and Apps] futuregerald:
Thanks for posting this, tried zinio but I've been wishing for B&N to make mags available in their app for some time. btw is it just me or is the app a little sluggish?
[Xoom Themes and Apps] patass:
anyone know the answer that that other guy's epub cover question? It doesnt seem to show covers on books you side load. I loaded the same books into my girlfriend's nook 3g and it shows the covers on that.
[Xoom Themes and Apps] SilentMobius:
I could investigate if you post the apk. We can't get the app outside of the US
[Xoom Themes and Apps] Terul:
Hey guys,

so I got the apk by downloading it with Market Enabler on my phone and then transferring the apk to my WiFi XOOM. Wish that Market Enabler worked on WiFi :\

Anyways, here is the apk for other Non-US members :)

Also, as for the sideloading question, I also could not see sideloaded epubs on the home screen. However, when you search for them with the magnifying glass in the top right, the epubs show up.

Hope that helps!

Cheers
[Xoom Themes and Apps] queens49:
I have a 3g nook as well, and the covers do not show up. If you browse your library of purchased items, you will see in the bottom LCD screen the covers of the books that you can scroll through. For items that are sideloaded, it does not show the covers in the LCD portion of the screen.

I just installed the posted nook app, and when you first open the book, the cover of the book isn't displayed. If you swipe to go back a page, it'll display the cover. It seems by default, it skips the cover.

It would be awesome to have the ability to display covers on the bookshelf, but I think B&N intentionally made it so it wouldn't display it. Aldiko is able to display the covers in the bookshelf view.
[Xoom Themes and Apps] graklore:
I can't find any of my pc mags available
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] Fluidification:
This is to whitehawkx, how did you make the lockscreenmod, I tried many ways and they don't work. I am making "JUST THE ANDROID LOCKSCREEN" for KD1
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] Beefvvl:
Questions belong in the general section.

Please follow the forum rules to avoid flame.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] fknfocused:
Or send a pm
[Atrix 4G Android Development] CyberPunk7t9:
Greetings everyone,

Well, Please know that I'm just placing an idea here and it's up for discuss before executing.

We (Users) sometime see those new atrix roms posted here and we think.. Oh! I don't want to flash a new rom now because I need my phone up and running or because we don't have the time.. But... I was just thinking then how it is for the devs??!

I'm talking especially about Ririal and Kennethpenn. Wouldn't it be easier and more convenience for them to have another Atrix phone beside theirs to crap the hell out of it testing new things for next rom changes and added features for all of us? + It still makes a nice gift for all the great work they have done here for all of us.

I was thinking that a new off-contact Atrix 4G at amazon wireless costs $600 USD.

So if we said each contribution is $20. then we need 30 donations each to buy an Atrix. 60 to buy two, for Riral and Kennethpenn.

That is just one suggestion on how donations are divided. I'd like members opinions as well Riral's and Kennethpenn's response about the idea.

Thanks.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] lyon21:
I think its a great idea/gesture. I just wish I had done money to donate. Switching jobs now. Hopefully I'll be able to contribute soon.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Main Target:
We have 2 extra in the office that I will talk to my boss about letting go for less than 600. Ill reply back later with the price :-)
[Atrix 4G Android Development] ikenley:
I would much rather get it into the hands of people like Quarx, who are working on 2nd Init or the Devs who think they might have a chance to bypass or crack the bootloader. Like the guy that cracked the Xperia X10 bootloader.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] bearsfan172:
I'm with you on this one. Most of the guys here probably have a backup phone to use if things go downhill while deving.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] kennethpenn:
What a nice gesture, guys. This is really kind of you to think about.

However, I strongly reject the idea that any Atrix devs need an extra phone. With the exception of kholk, who is working hard on the bootloader (if he's still working on it), none of us are at risk for bricking our devices. Save your money or donate to the themers and MOD creators instead. ;)
[Atrix 4G Android Development] jysue:
He has a dev atrix and a couple of guinea pigs already, still actively working on it.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] optimaljam:
well i want to get the evo 3d but im stuck on a 2 year contract so if I sell the phone for 600 i can pay 300 to cancel contract and 200 for the evo 3d...hm oh wellz. XD
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Alejandrissimo:
We need here TripNRaver

http://xdaforums.com/member.php?u=2689951

Best ROM developer on Xperia X10 and since x10 has an locked bootloader I think atrix is like this phone.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Gutterball:
Almost all bootloaders are locked. Its the signing/encrypting that is the problem not the lock.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Ririal:
Appreciate the gesture guys. The kind of work we do, at it's worst, will require a reflash. While a second device would be nice to have (Atrix is my main device, so every time I mess up I get to wipe all personal settings :P), it's not really needed. If you want to contribute, the donations you guys already send us are more than enough. :)
[Atrix 4G Android Development] CyberPunk7t9:
Thank you. it was just an idea.

Because we know how it must suck to have your device offline and in the bed-test for too long in order to bring those goodies for us. :)

I hope you guys will continue supporting the Atrix after a method to bypass the bootloader is achieved. It must be a harder work if it was a full-featured rom, so maybe we will re-open this subject then.

Thanks.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] jastnorn:
Well if new phones do come out, some employees at certian national retailers do get discounts on phones. I know at some places this can be $200. Where I work the atrix was about $200 off for an off-contract phone. So if in the furture a new phone does come out that the devs need then it might be a good idea to try that route. Also, since it is considered a "gift" than it should not be breaking any internal rules of any kind.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] s1mpd1ddy:
I donated to tenfar specifically so he could get a phone. anyone know if he still around?
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Alejandrissimo:
yep x10 is signed/encrypted just like Atrix and now x10 has nice gingerbread roms, MIUI and CM
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Ririal:
Partially true. The security on the x10 is very different than the security on the Atrix. Motorola seem to be the only people who are able to do it properly ;)
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Valiant23236:
I tried to flash a ROM and accidentally deleted the Recovery files on my phone (running 2.2.1 EC05), and even after re-flashing stock I can't recover the E: Drive information. Any suggestions on how to restore the E: Drive on my phone, so that I can flash again. I was able to root the phone using Clockwork Mod version 3.0.0.5/6 however even the recovery mode of that will not allow flashing a new ROM. Any ideas anyone because I really need to flash this thing, I'm going through withdrawals.
[Epic 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] KennyG123:
You could Odin your phone back to stock and start flashing again with instructions and files found here:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1052813
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] snandlal:
Anyone know in android what files would regulate the OS to determine whether to look for a SIM card or to identify imei CDMA phone?

Uncle Jimmy says hello
[Thunderbolt General] M.leonard2:
So...
[Thunderbolt General] titans808:
If you only googled you would have known by now
[Thunderbolt General] M.leonard2:
Tried that do you know or not
[Thunderbolt General] g00s3y:
No you didn't try it, the answer is all over here. Stop being lazy and partially dumb.

Wow, the first search result in google gives me the answer...

Lets make an easier list, which Verizon phones WON'T work on at&T...
[Thunderbolt General] Carl G35c:
No you cannot
[Thunderbolt General] M.leonard2:
Thanks for the simple answer.
[Thunderbolt General] dbisch:
You're really that retarded?
[Thunderbolt General] g00s3y:
But you said you searched right?

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1004199

Funny, the thread title is "[Q] HTC Thunderbolt on AT&T?"

And people wonder why the first thing said is, search for it...
[Thunderbolt General] Nikolai2.1:
Allow me to spoonfeed

ATT=GSM/HSPA+ (correct me if theyre the same thing)

Verizon=CDMA/LTE
[Thunderbolt General] M.leonard2:
Allow me to shed some knowledge on the real retards in this forum. When the BB STORM 9530 its Verizon but used a simcard therefore I was able to unlock it and use on ATT and tmobile.

Just like everything you read theyre two sides I figured I try Google didn't really clarify. So i figured I come over to the actual forum where people actually try to crack these things to get the maximum use out of them. But instead I get smart replies to a simple yes or no question. It's retarded to think such "smart" people cannot respond with a simple yes or no.
[Thunderbolt General] g00s3y:
Why didn't you respond to me? I typed in "Thunderbolt works on AT&T" in google and that was RIGHT THERE. The thread, which was posted March 22nd - almost 2 months ago, asking the same thing with the answer right there. So when you say you searched, you mean you didn't do anything.

And if you had read after you searched, you would have found out that the SIM slot is only used for 4G.

It's retarded to think such a "smart" person would do such a thing. :rolleyes:
[Thunderbolt General] mike.s:
That's awful generous of you, considering how little you have to share.
[Thunderbolt General] khanam:
The bolt uses an lte sim card. AT&T uses a GSM sim card. Won't work.

Sent from my thunderbolt
[Thunderbolt General] nerozehl:
Go play in traffic and leave the "smarts" to the big kids, ok?
[Thunderbolt General] mike.s:
'taint no such thing as a "lte sim" or a "GSM sim." Verizon uses a UICC which has both CSIM and USIM applications on it. Modern AT&T phones would have UICCs with USIM. Not being able to use a TB on AT&T has nothing to do with the "SIM" (correctly, UICC) card.

The TB simply doesn't support GSM-type technology. There's probably a frequency issue, but that's moot.
[Thunderbolt General] dclay89:
This forum is becoming full of assholes...
[Thunderbolt General] nerozehl:
Says the guy who has Cartman as an avatar. (j/k)
[Thunderbolt General] dclay89:
Haha, not a bad point...
[Thunderbolt General] yareally:
yay another "can the thunderbolt work on x network that's not verizon?" thread :D
[Thunderbolt General] qman66:
damn people on this thread are mean. just say yes or no. who cares if he googled or not.
[Thunderbolt General] junjlo:
wow I pray that XDA doesn't fall to trolls these answers are horrible no ones treating each other like a human everyone jumps on the ur retarded bandwagon its sad to see such a website fall to rude users.

if you really want people to Google then don't reply at all being rude is not going to help start treating people on these forums the way you expect to be treated if u came up to someone on the streets that asked u that question with the same responses you would surely be 6 feet under by now.
[Thunderbolt General] Shawn haz root:
We are smart. We also know how to use the search function. The 9530 was CDMA/GSM which is why it worked on ATT. Google is your friend buddy. Learn how to search.

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Thunderbolt+work+on+ATT
[Thunderbolt General] vmod32:
There IS such a thing as a DUMB question. And there is also such a things as being super lazy.

This guy asked a dumb question AND is super lazy. Two seconds of googling would have gotten him the answer. I see no reason to be nice to someone who is cluttering up the forum with nonsense because they are two vain to put the littlest amount of effort into searching. That's the real thing that destroys a forum.
[Thunderbolt General] g00s3y:
The fact that the same question has been asked about once a week. A simple Google search, as I showed in my post, was all that was needed, to answer a question that had already been answered, over and over and over and over again.

I tell people to Google if its a question that has already been answered. Why clog up a forum with questions that have already been answered? Just because the people are too lazy to type a couple words into Google? It took this guy longer to make this post then it would have taken him to find the answer on Google.
[Thunderbolt General] lancejt:
Really?

You are absolutely correct. People should search for the answer to their question before making a post with something so obviously asked before.

However, here is the flaw in your logic.

A simple "no" response would have both answered his question (respectfully) and ended the thread allowing it to drop off of the front page. Rather than doing so, this thread has now been turned into yet another soapbox for users to berate someone for asking a question that has been previously answered. Which to the previous point has now clogged up the forum. The question has been answered, everyone has had the chance to mock someone through the internet. Now can this thread please just end?
[Thunderbolt General] superchilpil:
If you want the thread to end then... Don't reply

Instead about worrying about these noobs who can't search, ignore them...
[Thunderbolt General] andrewc513:
If you're on AT&T, you can technically buy an unlocked ThunderBolt for $600 or $700 and use wifi only. No phone/data/SMS. :P Or no carrier, for that matter.
[Thunderbolt General] g00s3y:
The forum became "clogged" as soon as it was posted. Posting replies in the same thread does not "clog" up the forum anymore. If we all posted new threads on it, that would be clogging up the forum.

Not only that, after being told to google the answer, the OP lied and said he already did that. I showed in my post that was complete BS, because typing in "Thunderbolt works on AT&T" came up with the answer immediately. OP deserves everything he gets for "clogging" up the forum, lying about minuscule things, and just plain being lazy. I guarantee the next time he wants to ask a question, he will (hopefully) ACTUALLY search the next time and find his answer. Thus, the OP becomes smarter in the process, and nobody will flame him for doing so.
[Thunderbolt General] kriskmk:
it seems to me there are some elements in the community who are a little over-excited about either activities here in XDA.. or have some imagined sense of wanting to police and engage into heated discussions.

Whatever happened to "there is no such thing as a dumb question". ??

Usually when there is a thread in xda already addressing the OPs question or concern.. the civil thing to do has been to answer the question and point to the relevant thread.. OR at least simply point to the relevant thread. Asking people to google is silly.. because Google does not have all the answers and if everything is to be found out by googling.. why even have this Q&A forum?

Also to consider is that not everyone is versed with the workings of targeted search, link together and solve. People should not be bashed just for ASKING. If you don't like it.. don't respond.. it is very simple. What are we trying to save here? extra few megabytes of space on the xda server? no, really.. what is the harm even if someone asks a seemingly "dumb" question?

People need to curb their over-zealousness for wanting to police or just being a plain jack ass just because they think they have a valid reason to be one.
[Thunderbolt General] necosino:
This is very true. There is no such thing as a dumb question. However, asking the same question in a new thread when there is a thread usually on the same page asking the same question is, in fact, dumb.

We aren't mad that they don't know the answer; we get mad because the answer is readily available and easy to find if they would take 2 minutes to search/read.
[Thunderbolt General] kriskmk:
I understand.. but there are nicer ways to say it... for all you know the OP might be a really slow person who doesn't do the obvious.. which is why I said.. perhaps the more civil thing to do would be to ignore, or simply post the link.. or at least.. say in a nicer way that a specific search in the community would give him the answer. It's a learning process for a lot of people.. and the attempt should be to nudge the newbies/slow learners etc.. in the right direction. Just my 2 cents worth..
[Thunderbolt General] necosino:
Maybe we should all just start using http://lmgtfy.com/ ...
[Thunderbolt General] ProTekk:
Yeah, still wouldn't work on any other carrier besides VZW. It's the radio inside the phone that's tied to certain frequencies and not some locked crap that a carrier puts on there.
[Thunderbolt General] nikeair:
The ideology behind your post is part of what is wrong with this world, and another part is the OP. On the one hand you want to lower expectations for people (which only make them even dumber), and on the other the OP expects everyone to get him something.

This guy is not dumb, despite what everyone in his/her life has probably told them. He referenced the previous knowledge of unlocking a VZW BB to use on ATT. He is not a neophyte. A simple search and understanding (which he at least has the basics down) would have told him that at least some of the VZW BBs are global/world phones so they have a GSM radio as well as CDMA. The TBolt is not global, LTE simply requires a sim card.

CDMA != GSM

LTE != GSM

GSM == GSM

Just like I would never ask if my LTE TBolt is HSUPA.

Oh yeah, and normally I just ignore these threads (which you suggest) but I just had to comment on your post. As nice as you sound your ideas are just wrong. There are people in this world who genuinely need help due to mental or physical disabilities, then there are all the blood suckers out there draining the life out of people that work for what they have. Be that knowledge or material possessions.
[Thunderbolt General] ddarvish:
damn bro you are harsh... seriously do you have nothing better to do than troll the forums and put people down? do you have a job? a gf? grow up for ****s sake
[Thunderbolt General] nikeair:
Perfect example. Did he even read what I said? I'm assuming he did. But he doesn't dispute what I have said he just calls it harsh and tries to attack me personally.

No more time wasted replying on this thread though you've proven my point.
[Thunderbolt General] kriskmk:
LTE technology is actually quite compatible with GSM. :).. and if I am not mistaken.. is gonna be adopted by ATT.

See? there is always stuff to be learned.. even for people who are frustrated by others' "lack" of knowledge.
[Thunderbolt General] nerozehl:
First link in search results may be helpful. http://tinyurl.com/6y7hyoe
[Thunderbolt General] mike.s:
Compatible, but not compliant. Meaning, they can work side-by-side, but they're two different things. An LTE phone won't work on a GSM (actually, UMTS when referring to 3G) network, which was the simplified point of the OP.

AT&T will be adopting LTE, at which time they will probably first introduce GSM/LTE phones, much as the Thunderbolt is a CDMA/LTE phone.
[Thunderbolt General] kriskmk:
It is actually not accurate to call a phone "LTE phone" when discussing cross base technology radios (like CDMA and GSM) given the fact that LTE is a cross radio platform.

The point being.. it is not THAT unreasonable to wonder if an LTE device could work on ATT given the sharing of LTE technology. (but the fact that the radios are different completely nullifies that possibility)...

and thus a rude face-palm-situation is really a bit too much reaction to it.
[Thunderbolt General] andrewc513:
Haha, yep. Just making the observation that anyone **can** buy and use a Thunderbolt. But only as a tiny tablet, basically, if not on Verizon.

Come to think of it, I kinda do that with my N1. Since I dropped AT&T, I basically made it my experimental sandbox/dev device/tiny tablet.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] lexluthor:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1076150

I don't have the phone with my at the moment, so can't try.

Seems like it's very spotty as to which phones is currently works with.

Hopefully, someone can get it working on this phone soon.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] sgyee:
Doesn't work. I've tried.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] lexluthor:
Bummer. Hopefully people will figure out had to adapt it to more phones shortly.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] sitnlow4life:
has anyone tried using SGS tools to change the model number to GT-I9020T?

I see that the apk works on the Nexus S
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] stevekixs:
I will if you tell me how. I have SGS tools.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] mbernusg:
i changed the device to ro.product.model=Nexus S in the build.prop to spoof the netflix app but still receiving the device support error -__-
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] stevekixs:
OK so I did that. It should work according to some other forums I read. I was able to download the app from the market.

For some reason when I log in though closes after I hit sign in.

Works fine on my g slate
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] stevekixs:
Anyone else have this issue?
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] Yogi3:
Sucks to here this nice app did not work on that nice phone... it's a shame to see a low end phone like the G2 get it before the SGS4G ...

No issues here but I'm on a Nexus S 4G great quality on both 4G and WiFi ... I don't know if flash 10.3 has to do with anything ... Still it's a great app to finally have on Android :)
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] sgyee:
Rumors has it that Flash 10.3 has something to do with it, but it's also integration with the chipset itself that has a lot to do with it as well.