[Wildfire General] :
*i dont understand the point of LCDs here. if u r patient, let me know.

** regarding the question, as follows.

ok. i will tell u some of my ideas and comparisons, before creating this thread. now i dont argue with those ideas anymore and completely believe in the posts made by others on this thread. BELOW ARE THOSE THINGS

k. i compared the video recording of some phones and then i myself thought that the video recording capability is related to the screen resolution and the processor frequency. also thought that screen resol limits some serious 3d gaming and video playing capability. gaming and video playing are not discussed here in this thread. but i expect that gaming and video playing is also related to screen resol.,

The comparison here goes between wildfire and nokia 5233. once again noting the hardware of 5233 which has just 434 MHz processor, and a screen resol 640 x 360 , just a 2 MP cam. I dont want to mention the ram (which is much lesser for 5233) as i expect it has nothing to do with. So by summarising, we know only the screen resol of 5233 is greater. And the video recording capability of 5233 is VGA @ 30 FPS. [edit: I REPEAT, IT GIVES VGA@30FPS EVEN IN THE MIDNIGHT AT 12:00AM ON A NEW MOON DAY]. This makes every noob to think that screen resolution has something to do with video recording capability. I quit this comparison after someone here posted, not to compare the cam sensors of different models and different brands as some of them may be cheaper ones (post #4).

ok, then the comparison goes between legend and wildfire, which is much more perfect to compare. as both r android phones, i need not note the hardware. So, summarising, legend has just greater screen resol of 320 x 480, and a bit more processing power of 600 MHz. and LEGEND records video of VGA @ 30 FPS. So here thinking frm a new bie's point of view. First, let him think that cpu solely contributes to video rec, and screen resol has nothing to do with video rec. So he thinks that, a slight increase (by 62 MHz) in the processing power in legend improved video capture capabilities greatly which makes hard for a new bie to accept. Further a new bie thinks like this, if cpu is solely responsible for video capture capability, then wildfire when overclocked to 600 MHz should give the video capture capabilities of legend (which is not yet possible in any custom roms). This made me think that legend's greater screen resol has contributed to its video capture.

The same comparison can be made between wildfire and wildfire s. This is because wildfire s has same cpu and screen resol of legend, which give its VGA video capture. dont know its fps, since i havent seen in any website.

then moving to desire. I dont wanna make a comparison here as it is not fair to compare an ocean with a river. So desire got 720p mini HD video capture with the froyo update. i expect the fps is 30. I heard that 720p was built into its custom roms even before the froyo update. ok, desire has got a screen resol of 480 x 800, which cannot even be comparable to that of wildfire, like i said before. A noob definately thinks that there is some contribution from the screen resol, to the 720p capture. SUPPOSE, if the desire had a screen resol of 320 x 240 with 1 GHz processor and then got a 720p video capture, then a noob definately believes that screen resolution has nothing to do with video capture.

i hope u understood frm a noobs point of view, as everyone would once be.

those are my ideas only before creating this thread. now i completely believe in what people said in the posts. thanks guys