yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Thunderbolt Android Development] yumms:
Extreme is a no go...Normal version seems to work fine.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Nikolai2.1:
Love the .8 extreme version, and testing smartass.

A couple of questions, will you be adding some charging tweaks? This kernel charges really slow compared to other custom ones.

Also will you be updating to the latest kernel source anytime soon? (No big deal, just wondering)
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
There is a newer kernel source for the thunderbolt? Have I been living under a rock?

I will look into the charging tweak. Thanks.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Nikolai2.1:
No problem man, and theres a new 2.6.32.36

its not a thunderbolt source but a lot of devs are using this kernel
[Thunderbolt Android Development] asenduk:
v0.8 1.92GHz working GREAT!

all slots running fine and no issues yet

smartass seems to be a bit more stable

but ondemand gov still owns!

thanks for the 1.79GHz additional slot

been running this kernel for about an hour now

and got my highest linpack scores yet :D
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
Perhaps I missed it but what's the difference between extreme and normal?
[Thunderbolt Android Development] THATTON:
I believe the extreme version is undervolted more than the normal...
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
hehe sorry i changed he names on you guys. Extreme = super undervolted. normal = less undervolted.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
Thanks guys.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
What was 0.74, because that kernel was excellent on my device.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] kman100:
Just flashed the .8 extreme no issues with loading or anything
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
0.74 also had the same three flavors....
[Thunderbolt Android Development] JonKyu:
.8 extreme working great on my phone. Keep up the amzingness
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Richpopski123:
Was just thinking...

Did you use different voltages for 1.4 and 1.92? Doesn't make any sense why I would be able to use extreme 1.4 but not 1.92 unless 1.92 was even more extreme.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
dang it i think i confused everyone with the naming haha. Extreme = extremely undervolted but still 1.4, 1.92 = highly overclocked.

So your phone is easily undervolted but not overclocked.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Richpopski123:
Nope, this is my bad for assuming you read my post from before. I had no issues with your overclocking kernels until versions .7 and up.

The 1.92 slot actual works on the .8 version, but for whatever reason the middle slots do not work. No big deal, just trying to make sense of it, maybe i'm still missing something which is completely possible.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
V0.8 1.92 working good so far. Will report back on battery life. Thanks for adding the 1.7ghz slot :p
[Thunderbolt Android Development] DroidTh3ory:
What are the chances of a extreme 1.92 scaled up? I love having the throttle when I need/want it, and I love the ultra low voltages on the speeds below... And so does my battery. Best of both worlds possible in this case? :)

___
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Joanni:
Umm my phone locked into max throttle with the 1.92 and I woke up to an empty battery for my trip to philly lol. Using on demand and bamf remit.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] PerCompLLC:
^^^^^^^^^^^

This - Me too!
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Check the OP. :)

5) 1.92X - extreme+1.92, super-undervolted *and* super-overclocked (will probably run reliably for the lucky few).
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Ah hmmm.. Does v0.6 1.92 work for you better? You might want to also give the new 1.92X version a shot just for kicks.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] DroidTh3ory:
Well Well... Best of both worlds is possible.

Running it in now. Thanks!!

___
[Thunderbolt Android Development] cmo220:
So far 1.92X running well.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] asenduk:
so for so good with v.8 1.92X

testing out battery life...
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
1.92x froze on me after a while. Nooooo I got a lame phone!

leanKernel + Tesla coil
[Thunderbolt Android Development] asenduk:
how long would you say is the safest time for us to leave it at 1.92 using ondemand gov?

or does the phone boot itself as a precation..

EDIT: mine rebooted trying to multitask at 1.92GHz lol
[Thunderbolt Android Development] MadBrad11:
This kernel is great! I love the super low voltages. The only thing that I miss from adrynalyne's kernels are the audio tweaks. The speakerphone is really low on this phone and it really makes a big difference when increasing the audio levels in the kernel. If this can be added it will make this kernel even better.

Thank you Imoseyon for your work on this awesome kernel!
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
I think I need to tweak 1.92X a little more. I'll have another build for you guys when I can get away from home for a few min. :)

MadBrad, I will look at audio tweaks for 0.9. Thanks.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] cmo220:
Still no reboots on 1.92X. I've been running it on conservative governor overclocked to 1.92. It hasn't spent too much time that high but everything feels very quick.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
+1 to the audio tweaks. Just noticed that this morning when I was using the speakerphone.

Update: Battery life is the best I've had with any of the kernels and I've tried them all :eek: ~4%/hr
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Richpopski123:
Yep, v.06 works like a charm... Will use that overclocked in a emergency ( what kind of emergency requires that power? Rolls eyes at self).

And its a no go for the new 1.92x, doesn't clear the clouds!

Keep them coming :) this will keep me entertained to the max while watch some baseball games after wor.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] JonKyu:
Yeah my phone's weird, sometimes it'll boot up with the 1.9 kernel and sometimes hang at the bootscreen. When it does boot it freezes and restarts when trying to go 1.9
[Thunderbolt Android Development] mcseufer:
Checking out this kernel, now. The Normal 1.4GHz version.

One question, how and what does this help with?

4) No EXT2, TUN, FUSE, YAFFS/2, etc. Stripped down and lean!

Does that reduce memory usage, filesize? What benefits is #4 giving someone?

Thanks man,

M.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Do you mind testing this one? This should be identical to 1.92_v0.6 in terms of clock speed and VDD.

http://cl.ly/2q0h3W0V2G0H2P0x0H3L
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Great question. Removing kernel components reduces the footprint of the kernel. How much that helps is debatable. But it definitely doesn't hurt plus I like things that are minimalistic. :)
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
Isn't Tun required for VPN?
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Yup. It would definitely hurt if you need those features. ;)

leanKernel + Tesla coil
[Thunderbolt Android Development] WormDoes:
I apologize in advance for this question...I'm looking for max battery, but like being able to overclock to 1.3/1.4 if need be. Which of your Kernels would you recommend? I noticed extreme would probably be what I'm looking for, but which version? I've been running Adryn's 4.3b at 1.34, but battery isn't as good as I'd like it.

Also, OP, it appears you know A LOT about Kernels, may I ask you a question regarding governors? I was under the impression that smartass with out profiles was the best way to go, but recently heard people swearing by ondemand with profiles :confused:. Could you please give me your opinion on this matter? Thank you in advance for answering my questions and for your hard work
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Hi WormDoes,

I'd definitely recommend the lastest extreme version for best battery life.

As for smartass vs ondemand, I definitely like ondemand's performance better. Smartass has the advantage of locking the speed when the device is "sleeping", but you can easily achieve that by using profiles. So I believe ondemand w/ profiles is the best of both worlds.

As a dev though smartass is a bit more attractive since its code is simple and is a lot more easily customized, but I'm not sure how much coding will be required to make smartass perform as well as ondemand.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] WormDoes:
Thank you for the response. So extreme v.0.8 is the newest, correct?

Now that I think of it, when I had my Inc I used ondemand with a screen off profile and was really impressed with it. Thank you for clearing that up for me and I will definitely try ondemand.

I will let you know how the Kernel responds on my phone if it will help with future builds or whatever if you'd like? I just got the 1700mAh battery and will be testing it tomorrow so I'm looking forward to trying the new Kernel with it too :)
[Thunderbolt Android Development] cabagekiller:
My phone just does not like your kernel for some reason. I am using ziggy's kernel and I can UV it quite a bit. and him adding the sysfs VDD init.d script is nice to adjust the voltage to set it so my phone can use higher speeds.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] DroidTh3ory:
I've been running 1.92 X all day and it is perfect. Great job!!

___
[Thunderbolt Android Development] PerCompLLC:
Ditto for me... One of these days I'm going to learn how to compile kernels!
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
2.6.32.36 you say? I got 2.6.35.9 working!

well, almost working. ;) Just gotta fix the radio.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Nikolai2.1:
hahahahaha i dont even know what to say :D
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
Wow, that would be really nice. Are you seeing lots of improvement from the newer kernel?
[Thunderbolt Android Development] :
Hello Wormdoes,

So are you still running the BAMF Rom 4.1 or 4.1 remix?

Are you having any issues so far? I see you switched from the

Adryn's 4.3b, I was going to flash last night to the Adryn's 4.3c...

Then came across this link andvwonder how you like the new kernel?

Would you still recommend this over Adryn's? I have the stock Rom

rooted with the sense and HTC bloat, between the 3 roms, Tesla Coil, BAFM or

Virus rom. I seem to hear they run good on the TB.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] :
So everything still running stable on the TB? Me

Trying to decide between these kernals and Adryn's.

Kind of the same with roms,

1) stay stock rom w/root debloated or new custom ROM. How much will I gain?

2) which kernels Adryn's or Imoseyon....hmm which ROM

Tia,

Cheers - Azbobs
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
I was expecting a call, so I had to flash back. From what i saw it was pretty snappy and the linpack score was comparable to stock kernel. I'll go back to it once I get the existing kernel flavors more stable.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Those of you having issues with the *normal* version, could you please test 0.83:

http://cl.ly/5v0J

I'd really like the normal version to work for everyone if possible.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] b15love:
has anyone done any nenamark or other 3d benchmark (GL Benchmark is nice and free)?? really curious to see how the gpu performs with the cpu overclocked..
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
@ 1.92/1.92 using Performance

Nenamark: 47FPS (low compared to NS, as expected)

GPU Bench: 39014 Absolute, 36528 Relative (5th highest score)

An3DBench XL (this is a really good one, free as well): 29172 (405th best score)
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
Nenamark: 58.7
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Richpopski123:
This one works like a charm.

Why am I not donating to you? Taking personal orders!

You build, ill test it. Just not from 3pm to 2 am, because I'm too busy most of the time to check anything...

Great work, enjoying increased hart life and speeds!
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Forgetfull:
Extreme 0.73 used to work for me. I tried extreme 0.8 and I'm stuck in a boot loop and cant get further than the thunderbolt clouds,
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
v0.85

- reworked overclock code, tweaked VDD some more to stabilize. added audio & battery tweaks from adrynalyne per popular requests

I'm hoping v0.9 will be based on the 2.6.35 kernel.

Forgetfull - hey try 0.85 and let me know how it goes?
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Awesome, can you try v0.85 1.92 and 1.92X as well? Thanks man.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
Trying out the new kernels now
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
1.92X V0.85 is angry fast lol. Quadrant yield 3203 :)

Felt nice and stable so I stopped testing there. Thanks for the audio and battery tweaks definitely nice additions.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] themikeyan:
Testing. 85 extreme 1.41 for the first time. Excellent results so far
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Forgetfull:
This one works, Thanks, I guess my phone has a limit to how much voltage it needs:D
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Nikolai2.1:
Thanks for adding our requests on the new kernel :) one thing tho, using smart ass, is 87% normal for an hour and half of complete standby time? I feel like ondemand had better battery life
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
smartass on my kernel is still a work in progress. I'll continue to fine tune it until i get it right. I had to tune it pretty aggressively to have it match the speed of my ondemand governor so it's possible it lost some power efficiency along the way.

Also, i'm glad to hear reports that 0.85 overclocking/undervolting is a lot more stable. I'll stop meddling with the overclock code now, and focus on the other areas of the kernel. :)
[Thunderbolt Android Development] DroidTh3ory:
My phone is running great. One issue... My Bluetooth is having a delay. I miss the first word on my navigation and phone calls. Another think is the speaker phone volume.

Ideas?

___
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Nikolai2.1:
Alright cool man, ill switch to ondemand for now
[Thunderbolt Android Development] asenduk:
v.85 1.92X locked out on me while browsing, and it was only set @ 1024 on demand

went to v.85 1.92, no issues yet and its fast!
[Thunderbolt Android Development] PerCompLLC:
So far I am extremely happy with .85 Extreme! Thank you!
[Thunderbolt Android Development] :
Awesome kernal look forward to ur tweaks to come.. gr8 work,

Cheers
[Thunderbolt Android Development] ridobe:
My phone is not very tolerant of extreme uv but so far (two hours) it is handling this one. I really want it to like this kernel. Also, I am going with ondemand instead of smartass for the first time in a long time.

We'll see how it all goes.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
This was a custom kernel for 4dfl4, but I figure i'd share it with others.

leanKernel_battsaver - extremely undervolted (VDD 775-1000), stock speeds, ondemand & conservative only.

EDIT: yikes, accidentally disable camera on 0.86, use this one instead:

http://cl.ly/5wPi
[Thunderbolt Android Development] 4dfl4:
Been using it for few hours now no issues at all, boot time was very fast and i can already see battery life improved, thanks again for your work very appreciated.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Nikolai2.1:
You just keep out doing yourself haha, just flashed and gonna test ,i think ill like it. Does this have ondemand back ported from 2.6.39?
[Thunderbolt Android Development] :
What phone are you using.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Yup. Turns out I accidentally disabled the camera on that one. Use this one instead: http://cl.ly/5wPi
[Thunderbolt Android Development] 4dfl4:
thanks for pointing it out i will flash new one :)

EDIT:The new kernel added smartass governor too and camera working fine now.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Nikolai2.1:
haha alright sounds good bro :)
[Thunderbolt Android Development] piihb:
I am rocking the leanKernel_Extreme.

Great work and many THANKS to both Imoseyon & Adrynalyne!
[Thunderbolt Android Development] ridobe:
Well, no go. I got two freeze up/reboots. My phone can't handle any of the extreme low voltage kernels. Too bad. I'm running the normal one now.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] WormDoes:
I haven't flashed one of these kernels yet, I ended up getting busy last night and couldn't flash. I'm liking BAMF and 4.3b is ok, but I'm having issues with hotspot and wireless tether not working so as soon as I have time I'm definitely planning on trying OP's Kernel
[Thunderbolt Android Development] m00nshake:
I have been using the lean normal kernel with Virus rom for several days now, no OC as i believe its unnecessary, and it has been running silky smooth
[Thunderbolt Android Development] WormDoes:
I just flashed .87 and every time I try and use the hotspot, it says error and shuts my WiFi off. This is even worse than the issue I had with BAMF kerenel. Any ideas?? Wiped cache and Dalvik before flashing
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
I think I broke Mobile Hotspot in the battsaver 0.87. Try one of the kernels in the OP?
[Thunderbolt Android Development] WormDoes:
You're awesome! I've had issues all night and you're the first developer to actually answer my question.By chance would the hotspot and the wireless tether app be connected because opening that just fubared my phone. Force closes, music skipping, wifi off, etc. I will try the one from the OP. Thank you again

edit: flashed .85 and hotspot/wireless tether still a no go. I think I'll try reflashing my ROM when I have some free time. It's the only thing I can think of. AFA the Kernel, it seems extremely smooth and responsive. I'm going to continue to use it and see how it does on battery. I look forward to trying more of your Kernels
[Thunderbolt Android Development] tu3218:
Running .85 and running very fast and everything seems to be good. Question though, I was running adrynlyne before and those automatically adjusted the cpu when the screen was off. Does this kernel perform this or should I run a screen off profile with setcpu?
[Thunderbolt Android Development] JonKyu:
I think it does this if you run the smartass governer. Otherwise with on demand you would have to use profiles.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] tu3218:
Oh gotcha, thanks for the info. Any particular advantages to running one over the over? Which one typically offers best battery life?
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Nikolai2.1:
typically smartass, but with this kernel ive seen better battery life with the ondemand governor
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
Did you get radio working with the 35.9 kernel? If not, radio is totally overrated anyway :)
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Didn't get a chance to look. :( Perhaps this weekend.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] asenduk:
v.85 1.92GHz

thank you!

how about 2GHz? LOL jk

:p
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
man your linpack scores are consistently higher than mine, on my own kernel! What's your secret? I can definitely do 2Ghz but man i'm getting lost keeping track of all these different flavors already. ;)
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
You're not kidding lol, bring on 2Ghz bad boy :p
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Tesla 1.5 is out! Includes normal_v0.85 (or almost identical to it).
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Nikolai2.1:
Imoseyon, would you prefer .87 extreme or .85 extreme? Running .87 right now and i love it, but i am just wondering which was has lower voltage and just in general more awesomeness :cool:
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
So 0.87 was the battsaver version (i believe) and it is undervolted a little more than the 0.85 extreme. It is, however, not overclocked. So if you want the extra speed, go for the extreme.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Nikolai2.1:
Honestly i hardly see any change when overclocking this beast. I just want the UV to save battery life, thanks for the advice. Just re calibrated my battery to see if it works even better (been flashing roms like crazy)
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
You and Kejar did a good job with that. Nice rom, thanks
[Thunderbolt Android Development] kdb424:
On 1.92x and running stable through stress testing. I'll report back!
[Thunderbolt Android Development] themikeyan:
First day with .85 Extreme, running at 1.41max /245min, very nice, smooth rom. I noticed an ever so slight hit versus adrynalyne's newest kernel, but this one is running faster (i ran 1.228 with adryn's). Very nicely done, no complaints on charging time. Ran smartass on Adryn's, Ondemand for your kernel
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Richpopski123:
Just switched roms to the perfect storm and now my phone will run the extreme 1.92 kernel. Never knew the Rom could make a difference? Or maybe just had a weird flash?
[Thunderbolt Android Development] PerCompLLC:
CM7

@Imoseyon - Since it looks like they finally have RIL working for the CM7 port, it begs the question... Do you anticipate that your kernels will work with CM7? And if not, will you be building kernels for CM7? Just asking... :)
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
The Rom makes no difference.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Nikolai2.1:
Something is wrong with the .87 battery saver.. whenever I turn off WiFi it says error, so I'm guessing the radio never actually turns off
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Zyxwvu44:
great work i love your kernels. Just one minor request. could you put dates or versions? I can't keep track of what version is current or when you updated them. :confused:

Thanks a lot for your hard work!
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Richpopski123:
I think my phone thinks otherwise. :)

Has locked up on me twice this morning. And my battery died pretty fast (that might be because I woke up to it stuck to my arm)
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Yup 0.9 will fix that.

sent from my phone running leanKernel + Tesla coil
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Maybe maybe not. ;-)

sent from my phone running leanKernel + Tesla coil
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Good idea.

sent from my phone running leanKernel + Tesla coil
[Thunderbolt Android Development] kdb424:
From my experience on my Dinc, no the kernels will not fully work. Using a sense kernel on an AOSP ROM MAY WORK, but usually has some downsides. We will have some AOSP kernels almost as good soon. *breaks out my android dev vm and gets hacking*
[Thunderbolt Android Development] PerCompLLC:
Nice... ;)
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Trident1000:
I'm getting phenomenal battery life and performance with this kernel!

Thanks so much :D
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Breezer23:
Thanks! Running extreme at 1.41. Extremely smooth!
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
v0.9 (4/13/11) - dubbed the battery saving release!

- removed profiling for extra speed,

- reworked slab allocator (backported from 2.6.39-rc2),

- backported 2.6.35 wifi driver (low power mode!),

- added battsaver version,

- optimized the heck out of smartass for power efficiency (most amount of original code i've written in years! ;))

- removed performance governor

- disabled a couple of debug stuff for smaller kernel.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
That sounds way to stable for my liking :p
[Thunderbolt Android Development] mbh87:
Im sorry if I had missed this but what is the default governor? I tried reading the OP but my head is killing me so I could have missed it.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Default governor for all my kernels have been ondemand so far.

sent from my phone running leanKernel + Tesla coil
[Thunderbolt Android Development] mbh87:
Thats what I had thought, thank you. Trying out the battery saver now, was using your extreme prior. You should update your twitter with releases so I can keep up lol.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] v4npro:
Nice, going to try (1)extreme version this time.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] 4dfl4:
Really liked v.87 battery was really good, time to test v.9
[Thunderbolt Android Development] grynn15:
Just wondering... I flashed 0.9 and checked the kernel version and it had a buncha letters that looked like part of an md5sum and the word "dirty" at the end. The previous versions did not have this. Everything's kosher right?
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Droid_ALM2ND:
Loving this extreme version. No issues yet.