yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Thunderbolt Android Development] azturbomini:
V.90 is faster and or more responsive than V.87 was on my phone.

Thank you sir!
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
haha you're very observant. Nah everything kosher, no need to worry. :)
[Thunderbolt Android Development] asenduk:
v.9 1.92X working great! Smartass is nice now, but would you say that its better than on demand?
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
I still think ondemand performs a little better. Maybe I can optimize smartass a bit more, i dunno.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] BurnOne77:
.8 and up cleared up any issues i had performing awesome. Fast and battery loves it too.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] themikeyan:
Having an issue with. 9 extreme disconnecting my mobile network and repeatedly reconnecting. Went back to another kernel to further diagnose
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
Seems to be a couple of issues with 1.92X:

1. Linpack is quite low. Only getting about 38 where normally it's 60+

2. Radio is all over the place from disconnecting to going from 4G down to 1X.

Rolling back to the last kernel until the OP can take a look at this.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Hmm make sure you don't have setcpu locked at a lower speed, and use ondemand governor for linpack? I can't reproduce it here....
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
It was locked @ 1.92/1.92 using ondemand. Rolled back to 1.92X 0.85 and the two issues I mentioned are resolved.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
Thanks for the quick update
[Thunderbolt Android Development] MYxdaUSERNAME:
quad up to 2078 after fresh boot...

phone feels good navigating through apps and games seem ok...
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
Quadrant now up to ~2500, Linpack = 51. Will report back on battery life tomorrow
[Thunderbolt Android Development] footballer62:
do I need any special apps to have the cpu frequencies work, like setcpu or anything, or will this kernal do it all for me upon flash?

Sorry for the newb question, this is my first android device, and my first kernal update, which i decided should be yours!
[Thunderbolt Android Development] c_live_lee:
Hi, imoseyon. You may have seen this, or maybe you haven't. And Hell, you may not care in the least. :) I did want to point this article out though, after reading it last night.

http://androidspin.com/2010/08/23/my-quadrant-is-bigger-than-your-quadrant/

Both Chingy and Cyanogen noticed an issue there so I figured it may be worthy of mention.

Now, with this pointed out, I do believe I'm about to give your kernel a test drive. Thanks. So much.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Setcpu is not needed. Good luck and thanks!
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Yup. It's been a while I've used Quadrant. I mostly rely on linpack and this other one called "cpu benchmark".
[Thunderbolt Android Development] droid fetish:
Imoseyon, used your stuff on my x, luv it. got a small bug, angry birds wont install no biggie your stuff is worth it just wanted to mention. Also any chance on getting a little more "go go juice" I tried another kernel with a higher Ghz but wasnt as fast, I like your tweaks. THANKS:)
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Hey, so i just put this up on OP:

"1) Why 1.41Ghz? - my kernel's 1.41 runs very close to stock voltage at 1Ghz, and with the other frequencies undervolted you should realize longer battery life. If you go any higher, you're going to experience poor battery life since you need to use more juice to support higher frequency. Plus most of you probably can't tell the difference between 1.4 and 1.8. "

Having said that, i will continue to experiment and future versions may have something slightly different.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] shelooga:
imo, ran your battery tweak mod and it certainly worked. charging my battery now. convienently i just came on to see if there was a new lv kernel to put with the rom (my first!) that i built. ill report back
[Thunderbolt Android Development] thecaptain0220:
If we already have them installed will they interfere in any way? Assuming no but figured I would check.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Nope, you're fine. There's no harm even if my tweaks run multiple times. Th:De next version of the kernel will also prevent the ROMs from running the scripts from /etc/init.d again, since the kernel/ramdisk will take care of it.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] caramanis:
I don't seem to be able to access my sd card since installing this kernel. It says it's mounted, but I can't access it and all apps installed to the sd card are inaccessible. Could this be kernel related?
[Thunderbolt Android Development] ShanDestromp:
I had a feeling but was slightly hopeful of being wrong. I've got plenty if linux experience so dmesg is no problem for me, but sometimes it's hard enough to get the masses to provide a logcat with programs like alogcat, I fear out what it may be like if they have to do it through adb or a terminal emulator. Regardless good job. I'm running the first version you posted and other than the low benchmark scores which you seem to be aware of, it's flawless.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Nah something else has to be going on...

leanKernel + Tesla coil
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Thanks you should try v0.2 which fixes the low scores or wait for v0.3 coming later today.

leanKernel + Tesla coil
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
For some reason having an issue installing some apps. Oddly enough tried to install Raging Thunder 2 and Angry Birds and got rejected. Few others didn't work either. Not a biggie just pointing it out in case others are experiencing something similar
[Thunderbolt Android Development] egeorgia:
At 1.4 killed my battery. Going to dial it down and see what happenes.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Must be one of the things I disabled. Will have a fix by v0.3.

leanKernel + Tesla coil
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
Thanks....
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
hmmm i wonder what it could be. The overclocking code is exactly the same, as well as the governor code.... Would you mind flashing 0.9 one more time? Maybe the first flash missed some bits. ;)
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
Sure, no problem.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
Must have been a bad flash, all is good.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Whew. I was about to start reverting code. Let me know if it happens again. Thanks!
[Thunderbolt Android Development] LSUstang05:
Odd...I couldn't get past the HTC splash screen with the 1.92 kernel but I just was able to boot into the OS with the 1.92Xtreme Kernel. We'll see how stability is over the next few days!
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Richpopski123:
Don't change anything (back). I don't think I've seen anything so smooth.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] WormDoes:
Hey Imoseyon,

Love your kernels, but I've been having a small issue with .85 extreme. When I wake my phone it takes forever for it to wake up. Also, sometimes when typing its very laggy. I assume its the undervolting my phone is having a problem with? I really want the best battery possible, do you have any suggestion on which I should try next? Thank you in advance, sir
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Can you try the normal version first to see if the problem goes away ?

sent from my phone running leanKernel + Tesla coil
[Thunderbolt Android Development] WormDoes:
I got rid of my screen off profile, which I'm kinda worried about not using, and the lag is gone. Does your kernel underclock with screen off by any chance? Was the profile just overkill?
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
ah interesting. I've seen this happen with setcpu before on another phone. Try smartass governor without setcpu enabled?
[Thunderbolt Android Development] WormDoes:
You mean just set the governor to smartass with no profiles? Just curious could you make an extreme kernel setup with screen off by default to 245/245, but with all your tweaks and goodies included? I find it really helps to conserve battery on my phone. If its too much effort I completely understand.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
That's essentially what Smartass does. There's also a chance that your phone is intolerant to severe undervolting or overclocking. It would be great if you can test the safe and the battsaver versions to see if you can reproduce the same issue. Thanks.

sent from my phone running leanKernel + Tesla coil
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Chris Hansen:
Hopefully my battery is just reading wrong, but 1.41 extreme (.9) is killing my slim extended battery. Took it off the charger two hours ago and I'm at 51%. .87 was giving me excellent battery life

Thrown by Zeus himself
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Hmmm wipe battery stats?

sent from my phone running leanKernel + Tesla coil
[Thunderbolt Android Development] grynn15:
Using ondemand and .9 extreme 1.4 with a stock ROM, I unplugged at 97% at 1am. Woke up at 6am to 95%. It is now noon and my battery is at 86% with moderate usage (10+ emails, more Facebook than my boss should know about, some video streaming, and mp3 playing... and some angrybirds). Gps on, 4G on, Bluetooth off. Everything seems to be running smoothly.

Seriously major ass-kickery resides in this kernel.

When I get a chance to charge my phone I will try smartass.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] WormDoes:
Ok I'll try them both. Thank you for answering my questions. I'll let you know how it goes
[Thunderbolt Android Development] JonKyu:
Hey imoseyon, I was just wondering how much more undervolted the battery saver version was from the extreme version. Can you give the actual voltages? I really love the battery saver one but would still like the option to oc.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] azbryan3:
I'm excited about this :)

From my TBolt

Rooted

Perfect Storm v1.3

Imoseyon's leanKernel (extreme)
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
battsaver - 775, 850, 925, 1000

extreme - 800, 875, 1000, 1050, 1075, 1150

I think i'll probably change extreme to match battsaver for the first four slots some time in the future.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] JonKyu:
Perfect! Thanks, looking forward to that release :-)
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
2.05Ghz

Does this work for anyone? It locks up on me after a few min... :(

http://cl.ly/5zza/imoseyon_leanKernel_2.05X_v0.9.zip
[Thunderbolt Android Development] asenduk:
Dl'ng now....

EDIT: no go.. locked up while running 2nd linpack test :'(

on a positive note, 1st test yielded 63.479 :)
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
Won't even boot for me :(
[Thunderbolt Android Development] asenduk:
i really wanted it to work

:(
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Chris Hansen:
First thing I did, can't remember if I did last night or not, still charging, so we'll see!

Thrown by Zeus himself
[Thunderbolt Android Development] y2ktibltd:
Won't boot for me either. :-(
[Thunderbolt Android Development] PerCompLLC:
I'll chime in as another satisfied customer... .9 extreme has solved all of my battery issues!! Don't even need the ugly extended battery that I purchased from VZW. In anticipation of kernel mods I actually returned it to VZW last week. :D

Thank you Imoseyon!!
[Thunderbolt Android Development] dmrnhs:
Anyone have the v0.85 of 1.92x. My phones performance is low on the .9 version. Nenamark 20 fps vs. 42 fps on .85
[Thunderbolt Android Development] WormDoes:
Just flashed normal .9. Seems much snappier for me than extreme. Going to test it some more, but so far so good
[Thunderbolt Android Development] dmrnhs:
can I get a copy of the 0.85 1.92 extreme kernel if you have it
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
here you go: http://cl.ly/5uOU

Let me know if you can consistently reproduce the performance difference between 0.85 and 0.9 - something I can look into.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] dmrnhs:
How would i go about flashing the kernel, the enable_swap.zip, and your v6.2.1 tweaks package for maximum performance gain
[Thunderbolt Android Development] lpd0084:
Love this kernel! Running perfect storm w/ .9 normal
[Thunderbolt Android Development] NetworkPIMP:
I will expand on this question by asking if there's a specific order they should be flashed for maximum benefit... ??

as for how to do it... well, c'mon now ;)
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Chris Hansen:
Battery is still horrid, 20% in less than an hour and a half. Don't know what happened... :(

Thrown by Zeus himself
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Hi there,

You should flash the kernel and enable_swap.sh. You no longer need the tweak zip if you are running my kernel.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Weird. Which version and which governor are you using? Have you installed any new app?
[Thunderbolt Android Development] azbryan3:
I can't find that screen now... How did you bring that up?? (Just changed ROM's and can't remember how I got there before...

From my TBolt

Rooted

Perfect Storm v1.3

Imoseyon's leanKernel (extreme)
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
Go into settings, about phone, battery, batery use
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
minor update (unless you're running smartass)

v0.92

- fixed smartass performance (should be close to ondemand now),

- changed default i/o scheduler to noop and removed other i/o schedulers (even leaner!)
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Chris Hansen:
This is on .9 and default governor (so ondemand I guess). .87 was way more conservative in terms of battery usage for me. I didn't mess with the phone much since fully charging it, mostly just texting.

Thrown by Zeus himself
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
Try setting up a sleep profile with setcpu, this way when your screen is off it downclocks which should save you on some battery life. Just a thought.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
Still find ondemand to give a little better battery life. Although smartass has come a long way.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] lilpeezy23:
Ditto. Extreme is running like a wild beast though
[Thunderbolt Android Development] corenojoe:
Just flashed v.92 gonna see what kinda battery life I get with smartass governor now.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] 4dfl4:
Just flashed v.92 batterysaver if its gonna make my battery even better than v.9 ill be a happycamper ;)
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jasonbiggs:
Flashed .92 and using with OnDemand. Although the stats still show version .9...is this cool? Thanks.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Yup i only change that string on major version upgrades.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Chris Hansen:
Not a fan of a laggy wake up, makes answering calls frustrating.

FOUND OUT MY ISSUE THOUGH: User error, naturally. You'd think I'd know that after all my years in IT. I uncheck the always on mobile data feature, as it saves a ton of battery. Somehow it was turned back on, that was the factor that changed. Turned off, and battery seems a ton better so far. Can't wait to see what .92 does!

Thrown by Zeus himself
[Thunderbolt Android Development] JonKyu:
Imoseyon I gotta question. I noticed in spare parts that wifi is running %100, does that mean it running all the time even when the screen is off? I think I remember with the Droid x that it turned off when it slept and re-enabled when waking. Is it possible to mimic this on the tbolt, would it even make a difference?
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Trevlo:
The .4 version of 1.92 worked flawlessly on my phone yet neither of the 1.92s that are the .92 version works. Now I'm using the normal one and it works great. I don't even know that I notice a difference between 1.92 and 1.4
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
Having stability issues with V0.92 1.92X and 1.92. Getting quite a few reboots and lockups.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
I set sleep to 384/384 or 480/480 and that resolves the issue of laggy wake up.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Hmm the only difference between 0.9 and 0.92 are smartass code and i/o scheduler change. I'm assuming you're using ondemand right? Would you mind testing the following two? I changed the scheduler back to deadline.

http://cl.ly/61m8

http://cl.ly/61nz

thanks!
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
You should be able to modify that behavior in the wifi advanced settings?
[Thunderbolt Android Development] corenojoe:
Some people are saying they get better battery life with normal than extreme, does it just dependent on how your phone handles voltages?
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
Yes, I am using ondemand. I will test those two and let you know.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
So far so good with V0.93 1.92X. Will keep testing for another few hours to make sure it's stable.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Thanks let me know..

sent from my phone running leanKernel + Tesla coil
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Could you pm me if you are willing to test a new build for me?

sent from my phone running leanKernel + Tesla coil
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Nikolai2.1:
Do you think it would be possible to add another slot into the kernel? From using Drods BFS, his is the only one where i can set a screen off profile and not get any wake lag, and i prefer this over smartass much like yourself.

The thing is i can only do it if i have screen off set to 245 min and 384 max... would it be possible to add a 384 max? That would be perfect!
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
I do have a 369mhz slot.. Which version are you on?
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Nikolai2.1:
welll im still on .85.. is there one on there too and did i miss something? lol

edit: battsaver
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Nikolai2.1:
Never mind i see now... and i flashed .92, so far so good. I guess theres a tiny bit off lag on 368, but its nothing i cant deal with reallly :)
[Thunderbolt Android Development] mbh87:
.92 battsaver seems to be running quite a bit smoother than the previous version.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
I improved smartass a bit more in the version i'm testing now so I think you can probably use smartass instead of ondemand on the next version if you're interested in locking in lowest clock speed when suspended.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Nikolai2.1:
yeah that would be nice man! Prefer no wake lag of course, but do what you can do!
[Thunderbolt Android Development] corenojoe:
thats what Im looking for too
[Thunderbolt Android Development] LeoD:
Think it possible to make smartass the default gov?
[Thunderbolt Android Development] azturbomini:
I have extreme .92 set at 1280mhz on smart ass and it is working perfectly.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
V0.93 1.92X is all good. Not having any of the issues I was having with 0.92. Thanks for making the kernel to test.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Cool thanks for testing. I will revert to deadline. It's a bummer too since noop was supposed to be the simplest and most effective scheduler for flash drives. But honestly there wouldn't be any difference between the two.

LeoD - it's possible, but I think most people prefer ondemand still. What i'll probably do is to make a zip for folks to flash to make smartass default if they don't have setcpu.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] corenojoe:
I have the same thing set and also no issues.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jasonbiggs:
Jess just to let you know I'm running .92 battery saver without any issues ...
[Thunderbolt Android Development] JonKyu:
Yeah I'm an idiot lmao I just remembered it was on the wifi settings ...LOL ugh sorry about that
[Thunderbolt Android Development] LeoD:
LeoD - it's possible, but I think most people prefer ondemand still. What i'll probably do is to make a zip for folks to flash to make smartass default if they don't have setcpu.[/QUOTE]

Appricate it. I actually have a paid version of setcpu. To me tho with your kernel running @ 1.4 uv and if I use smartass I know I would prefer to let it do its thing on its own. Shouldn't have a need for it. Thanks ether way
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Richpopski123:
I had the same issue, but it stopped when I switched roms.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Can I ask you what ROM you were using then and now?

sent from my phone running leanKernel + Tesla coil
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Richpopski123:
Lotus to perfect storm.

Amazing batt life on lotus to ok on perfect storm.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
Lotus is good, Bamf is excellent on battery life especially when coupled to these kernels. Telsa was quite nice on battery life but AOSP was kinda boring considering I already own a Nexus S.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
more craziness from imoseyon

v1.0

introducing interactiveX governor (interactive + my own suspend code which locks at lowest clock speed when screen is off). I like it so much I made it default!

heavily optimized smartass code (again)

undervolted 1.92X a little more at the top end (let me know if this causes issues with 0.9 1.92X users)

removed conservative governor

went back to deadline i/o scheduler (was causing issues with 1.92 overclock - thanks jlevy).

A little extra treat for you guys. Try this command "dmesg | grep imosey" to see what your wake/suspend activities look like when you're using either interactiveX or smartass.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
Nice...haven't used interactive since the Nexus One says. Can't wait to try it out.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
Real nice kernel, especially liking the interactiveX (v1.0 1.92X). Just monitoring it through 'time in state' and my lowest clock speed is getting pinged 90+% of the time.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Richpopski123:
I always try to break the kernel right away... Successful after 4 min of screen flips and opening every app I could, frozen! My phone doesn't seem to quite handle this little extra undervolt, but its still a great kernel!
[Thunderbolt Android Development] JonKyu:
When I input that into terminal I get "imosey: not found" and "write: broken pipe". Did I do something wrong?
[Thunderbolt Android Development] jlevy73:
I get the same error message you did
[Thunderbolt Android Development] azbryan3:
Wow 50% remaining off 10+ hours using the normal v0.92. So excellent!!

-On the Bolt via XDA Premium-
[Thunderbolt Android Development] corenojoe:
Quick question:

I see the new v1.0 has a new governor and a few other tweaks. However I have been getting amazing battery life with v.92 extreme. So, do you think its worth while to go to v1.0 or should I stick with what's working?

Just wanted a little advice.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] pegasixi:
I'm using the 1.0 extreme version running at 1.41Ghz, but my Quad scores are only in the low 2100s.... Is this normal? Temps are below 35C TT
[Thunderbolt Android Development] LeoD:
Real nice looking forward to this, ty
[Thunderbolt Android Development] 4dfl4:
Just flashed v1 batterysaver and got a reboot on interactiveX governor now using ondemand very smooth
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Veridor:
Seems the interactiveX governor stays at 1 GHz in setCPU for battsaver v1.0. Would ondemand or smartass be better on battery?

Sent from my HTC Thunderbolt using Perfect Storm themed XDA App
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
Oops my bad it should be:

dmesg | grep imosey

Just woke up. :) Will take a look at some of the other problems you guys reported with 1.0. It's possible that interactiveX governor is slightly less tolerant to overclocking/undervolting. I will test that. In the meantime, you can't go wrong with smartass or ondemand on v1.0.
[Thunderbolt Android Development] lilpeezy23:
Seems like your new governor eats battery a little faster. Works great just faster drain when awake for some reason. Back to smartass and it's running great
[Thunderbolt Android Development] Imoseyon:
The previous version of 1.92X worked fine for you without freezing? If that's the case I can revert the extra undervolt. It just seems to be in my nature to meddle with things that work fine...