yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] str8chillin1805:
I had my phone mounted to laptop to transfer files and when i was done i left it on for a little so i later took it off and went film using camcorder but a message popped up, i didnt catch all it said but i know now has to do with my problem. I went to access my gallery and a messaged popped up saying "Damaged Sdcard" and something about having to reformat it. I turned off phone pulled sdcard put sdcard booted phone, still nothing. Unmounted sdcard and now my phone doesnt recognize a card at all. I plug phone into laptop and it doesnt give me the option to mount as disk drive, so i cant format through computer. Booted into recovery and still not able to format because theres no sdcard mounted. Anyone got any suggestions. Its a class 10 16gb Patriot LX microsd from newegg.com i just received it a little over a week ago and everything was fine until today. Im thinking about opening an RMA through them and doing a product exchange, but if theres a way to salvage my info on sdcard that would be great. Please let me know of any suggestions. Thank you.

Sent from a guy on an Evo w/ MikFroYo 4.5 waiting to up to 4.6
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Ryjabo:
Forgive me if you've done this, but:

Settings | SD & Storage | Mount SD Card

?
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] str8chillin1805:
First thing i tried but it says insert memory card to be mounted. Its not being recognized.

Sent from a guy on an Evo w/ MikFroYo 4.5
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rugedraw:
Do you have an adapter so you can plug the SD card directly into your computer and not via the phone?
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] str8chillin1805:
That was gonna be my next step but im out of town right now and dont have an adapter handy and i already contacted newegg.com so they are going to replace it at no cost. But im still going to try to that and hopefully back my stuff up.

Sent from a guy on an Evo w/ MikFroYo 4.5
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] cmdauria:
Just pull the card and reinsert it...That should fix it!!
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] str8chillin1805:
Tried that as well. I think it was a bad unmount from laptop.

Sent from a guy on an Evo w/ MikFroYo 4.5
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] drmacinyasha:
Mount the SD card while in recovery, and delete the LOST.DIR folder on it. See if that helps at all, and if Windows gives a pop-up about repairing/checking the disk, let it go ahead and scan+repair.
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] fightr:
After 20 minutes after updating to the latest MIUI, my Evo suddenly restarted. It got the white screen, but before loading any further, it restarted to the white screen and repeated the whole process infinitely. The only way to stop it is to do a battery pull.

I have tried wiping the data, but the issue is still there. After selecting the option to boot into recovery, the phone does the exact same thing (cycling the white boot screen). I even tried updating the recovery with the zip file, but that problem is still there.

Does anyone know what's wrong with my evo?
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] k2buckley:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1009672

Uh oh! Oh no! Read that thread. Everything you could possibly try is in that thread, it went 27 pages!!, and is still active. There was no solution found, but if something might work for you, it will be in that thread, I promise.

Hopefully an ruu will work for you.

I sincerely wish you luck.
[EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jander6442:
not another one... ok so I would first post your info ROM, kernal, Hboot all the info in advanced. This happened to me last week. All I see now is bootloop post... this is BS.
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] DevilMayLaughXD:
is there any way to turn offline without using airplane mode? because i would like to use my bluetooth in offline mode for some specific reasons..
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] arlrb:
Of course - settings > wifi & networks.

All setting are there.

Or you can install widgets to switch these things on/off.
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] DevilMayLaughXD:
no, the bt does not work , only the wifi works
[Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] avatar7:
Hello,

On my Desire HD my twitter contacts will not show in my people list.

On the Twitter app settings I have selected Sync All under contacts and same for the Facebook app. However in the People list if I click on Menu > View, My facebook contact lists shows however there is nothing for my Twitter list.

I have synced account but still nothing.

Has anyone else experienced this problem and if so there is a fix?

I am trying to link my twitter contacts to my phone list and I have to use the Twitter for HTC Sense as a workaround.

Thanks
[Galaxy S II General] android_master:
Guys have a look at these pictures.

I am just posting some more screen comparisons in the following order---

1) Super Amoled Plus vs Super Amoled

2) Super Amoled Plus vs Super Clear LCD

3) Super Amoled Plus vs Retina Display

Have a look at these pictures,screen comparsion to see how much brighter & crisp is super amoled plus
[Galaxy S II General] android_master:
Continuing in the same order
[Galaxy S II General] android_master:
You Guys can find more information Here
[Galaxy S II General] AllGamer:
all of the above just reinforces why i like SAMOLED/+ more than SLCD and/or Retina displays

in this case Retina has the worse colour and density
[Galaxy S II General] martino2k6:
Wow... Retina looks really blurred...
[Galaxy S II General] AllGamer:
nooo... zoom it, click on it, it looks clear, it's just pale and colours are not vivid
[Galaxy S II General] nicelad_uk:
What are they like in direct sunlight though? I know the retina is very good...
[Galaxy S II General] martino2k6:
I did. I guess you can call me blind then.
[Galaxy S II General] drleospaceman:
Hard to say which is the most color accurate; the iphone/SGS definitely have colder color temperatures, but the SGS2 looks a bit warm (the reds don't look very deep). Also there is major red crushing in the parrot picture.
[Galaxy S II General] walk.away:
interestingly you havent posted the parrot picture from the same article. for some reason the super amoled plus has a distinct lack of detail for the feathers on the parrots back. there is no shadowing inbetween the feathers.

vs super amoled

http://www.mobiset.ru/photos/2011/march/29/samsung_i9100/disp_sgs_6b.jpg

vs super lcd

http://www.mobiset.ru/photos/2011/march/29/samsung_i9100/disp_inc_6b.jpg

vs retina

http://www.mobiset.ru/photos/2011/march/29/samsung_i9100/disp_iphone_6b.jpg

any reason for the difference between all the other photos and this specific one? maybe it doesnt deal with red as well?
[Galaxy S II General] AllGamer:
is not just red observe the blue and yellow, it's dull on the retina

as for the SAMOLED it's the vivid colours that over take the edges (shadow)

is just like when you set a TV to very bright colours settings
[Galaxy S II General] Ok_Kaleidoscope5109:
Granted the iPhone's colors are off due to about only 65% of Gamut, you won't really notice it given the excellent contrast. So it's not that things aren't sharp because sharpness comes with high contrast.

AMOLED completely oversaturates.

Anyone do photography? Take your photo and take Saturation and do a +40 on it in Adobe Lightroom. That's AMOLED. Of course photos side by side will show it look nice, and the other one will be washed out, but which is more accurate for looking at photos or videos? Shrug
[Galaxy S II General] moparman:
Its possible to adjust on Samsung Galaxy with CM7(2.3.3)

So i belive it will work on SGS2 in time..

I post this from my Nokia N900 so i hope you can se the picture..

Sorry for my bad english :-)
[Galaxy S II General] ryude:
The SGS 2 is just wayyyyy over contrasted and oversaturated, they need to tone it down otherwise you lose a lot of detail like what you see in the parrot picture.
[Galaxy S II General] TheWarKeeper:
You guys are having some trouble understanding whats going on, so im gonna attempt to explain it.

The reason you see the parrot picture "oversaturated" and shadows not showing in properly is becaus oled technology surpasses easelly the native 1250:1 contrast ratio of a lcd display so youre trying to see the over lcd quality on an lcd, which frankly does little sense as your lcd screen will bottleneck the real quality of oled, furthermore the camera quality can also be questioned aswell regarding this matter.

It sounds stupid for ppl who dont know much about image displays, but for those who do know the diff between oled and lcd it makes a decent ammount of sense.

The "Overbrightness and oversaturation" you see there are simply the oled subpixels doing their job, lightning up, the camera & the lcd screen cannot display it as properly as a backlighted washed out lcd.
[Galaxy S II General] ryude:
You know, just because you make a post with the attitude of knowing what you're talking about doesn't mean you know what you're talking about.

It's oversaturated, the end.

Original photo:

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/__IGXYXpe2...I4/JkMo1hEry40/s1600-h/Over+Saturation+01.jpg

Over-saturated photo:

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/__IGXYXpe2...JA/vCIwlukAyvg/s1600-h/Over+Saturation+02.jpg

Wow, it looks suprisingly the same as what the SGS 2 display is doing, I wonder why?!
[Galaxy S II General] TheWarKeeper:
Im not trying to show off or anything, but what you are saying is false, "the end".

This is OLED technology, there is no such thing as "oversaturation" this doesnt use a backlight, the blue, green and red pixels are made of light, LIGHT, they are not complemented by the lcd backlight as a tn or ips panel does... so colors will look alot more realistic with bigger contrast ratio, with pure blacks and whites.

The camera quality is clearly average at best compared to a proper professional HD Cam corder, so it couldnt properly interpret the oled panel as its made purely of light, its like taking a snapshot of the sun, youre gonna miss details around it.

And then theres your screen, i take it ure viewing it in a LCD screen instead of an oled right? u cant compare lcd vs oled viewed on a lcd screen because that will downgrade the quality of oled to an lcd, no brainer here.

I dont understand why youre feeling so down, i bet you live in the marketing world where LCD is awzome and beats everything around... the fact is tough, lcd is by far the worst technology for color reproduction and pixel response time.

So i dont really get what youre trying to say here, see an oled screen in real life then talk ok?

The only difference between a normal oled screen and samsung galaxy s2 superamoled plus is that it has 6 subpixels to form 1 full pixel instead of the typical 3 pixels, the 6 pixels combined together can provide better color reproduction and more accuracy compared to only 3.

Its like saying psone has better specs than ps3...

Oh and for your comment with the 2 pictures:

It is more than clear that the second image has been manipulated in a graphis software with more saturation, as the colors get pixelated and edges jaggy.

There is a difference between contrast ratio and saturation but from your comment you still cant understand what it rly is...

For once, how can u see oled pure black (pixel turned off) on a screen that to display the picture it has to have the back light always on...

How do u expect a pure red color when you have a white bulb backlight? the same goes for blue and green...

You will never be able to understand oled quality from an average snapshot displayed on a lcd screen, if u cant understand something as basic as that then, please, remember that saying: "It's better to keep quiet and..."
[Galaxy S II General] LoveisPeace2012:
+1
[Galaxy S II General] android_master:
Wow,thats some great knowledge man:)

+1
[Galaxy S II General] dinan:
I agree with what you're saying, just wanted to point out that the SAMOLED+ screen will have a normal RGB stripe so it's 3 subpixels for each pixel, rather than 2 subpixels in the current SAMOLED pentile (RGBG - RG being 1 pixel, BG being the next, so 4 subpixels for 2 full pixels). So yes, I happily welcome the fact that it'll be RGB per full pixel like most traditional displays.
[Galaxy S II General] TheWarKeeper:
Hey thx for commenting but:

http://www.intomobile.com/2011/02/2...s-than-previous-amoled-screens-better-colors/

IT looks like its actually 12subpixels not 6, which actually makes sense since 6 would distort the image to much.

EDIT: Oh and for the 2 subpixel thingie, it doesnt work like that, each subpixel color has its own voltage value, else you wouldnt be able to reproduce red or blue image since t he green were always on.

Best Regards
[Galaxy S II General] awesome-member:
beg to differ,

try printing a photo displayed on your phone and you will see clearly that the images on amoled are over saturated.oled is a superior tech but there are oled displays without the 'oversaturation' .take the screen of nokia n8 or c7 for reference although they dont use backlight they are not as over saturated as samoled. download a professionally encoded movie and see for your self (although back will look amazing on samoled) you can clearly see over saturation (skin colour for instance ) 'i would not blame camera in this case.

simply because samoled can produce a wider color gamut does not mean it has to over saturate just to prove the point.i am a fan of contrast ratio of smoled but on accurate colour reproduction its just (in lack of better words) S*it.
[Galaxy S II General] TheWarKeeper:
This issue has been adressed and already explained. All youre doing now is simply disagreeing and confusing color gamut with contrast ratio.

EDIT: oh and ive almost forgot, so you believe that:

the nokia n8 3 subpixel R G B can produce a better color accuracy than

(not 6 apparently but) 12 subpixels? of samsung galaxy sii?

Even logically that couldnt be further from the truth...

Furthermore the amoled screen on nokia n8 is the worst ive seen so far in contrast ratio, i know, ive had 1 in my hands.

The videos, the menus, the photos looked all unapealing and darkened out, probably caused by that dreadish anti glare they use similar on nokia 5800xpress music
[Galaxy S II General] drleospaceman:
The non-plus S-AMOLED in the same photo doesn't have the completely overblown & crushed reds, so you can't necessarily blame the camera or the monitor it's viewed on. The reason the N8 looks dim is because of an over-aggressive light sensor. If you disable it, the screen gets insanely bright.
[Galaxy S II General] vitalij:
stop that nonsense already. samoled had 2 subpixels per pixel, samoled plus has 3 subpixels per pixel that is exactly 50% increase.
[Galaxy S II General] TheWarKeeper:
wow i give up, you guys are all asking the same adressed questions over and over again, read the thread... this subpixel count has also been adressed, namely in post #21, furthermore there is no screen in the world which functions with only 2 subpixels to reproduce RGB colors as such thing is irrational -.-

The insistence in the lack of knowlegdge is impressive...
[Galaxy S II General] mr_Ray:
That's some impressive ignorance you're showing in this thread ... SGS2 having 12subpixels per pixel??? Seriously bonkers there. It has a standard 3rgb grid instead on the lousy pentile junk with 2 subpixels per pixel (alternating rg /gb), which can be looked at as either 2 subpixels per pixel or 4 subpixels per pixel pair.

Btw not only are there displays with 2 subpixels per pixel, there are rgb displays without subpixels, you just wont see them in phones...
[Galaxy S II General] Success100:
this is the battle of the geniuses in which every person says every person is a liar...keep it going! lol
[Galaxy S II General] dinan:
I don't know how you're defining a pixel or subpixel here but it's obvious in that picture they're comparing a 2x2 pixel matrix and counting the subpixels. So yes, 4 pixels has 8 subpixels in the current SAMOLED, and SAMOLED+ will have 12 subpixels since it's 3 subpixels per pixel (3 times 4).

You can even check yourself... 800x480 screen with 3 subpixels per pixel is 1,152,000 subpixels for the whole screen, which is exactly what the picture in that article says. Likewise, 2 subpixels per pixel is 800x480x2 = 768,000 subpixels, exactly like it says in the article.

If you were correct where each pixel had TWELVE subpixels, then you would have a subpixel count of 800x480x12 = 4,608,000 subpixels for the entire screen. I hope I don't need to tell you that this would be incorrect.
[Galaxy S II General] TheWarKeeper:
Sigh...

http://www.intomobile.com/2011/02/2...s-than-previous-amoled-screens-better-colors/

http://www.oled-display.net/what-is-super-amoled-plus

http://telecomjunction.wordpress.co...y-super-amoled-plus-explained-video-included/

I keep posting these, and yet you choose to ignore them, u can surely make samsung galaxy s2 pixel render a quarter of the 12 in total, but this is the information we have right now so i hardly see any point doubting it, 12 subpixels combined together provides better color accuracy than just 3, or are you having problems understanding the logic of voltage regulation levels here?

If samsung information is false then once the phone comes out its as easy as getting a proper magnifying lense and making the phone render 1 white subpixel while the rest of the entire background is black...

As for the 2 subpixel per pixel talk, if 1 pixel has

1 red subpixel + 1 green subpixel while the next pixel has 1 (red or green) + 1 blue:

Is valid, however its also unconsistent with saying that the same subpixel reproduces red and blue and another subpixel reproduces red and green which together form 1 single pixel, which what ive said before makes no sense at all tying 2 colors on the same voltage regulator...

So yes, this is ignorance talking.

Was that an attempt to distort my post meaning?

And please stick to the topic, nobody here is talking about FLCOS Microdisplay RGB subframes or DLP or whatever else you have in mind is irrelevant for this thread.

This is Active Matrix OLED vs Active Matrix LCD comparison, nothing else.
[Galaxy S II General] dinan:
Don't try and cover up your mistake and claim we're off topic man. Your 3rd link even says:

And yes, that's exactly how PENTILE matrix works. Each pixel is not capable of representing the full color scale but rather relies on adjacent pixels to work in conjunction to create a full color which is why pentile displays appear grainy.

Stop giving us your "sigh..." and realize that you're talking about two different things here. You're trying to tell us 12 subpixels resolves better color than 3 subpixels which isn't even a comparison that makes sense because 12 subpixels is FOUR pixels compared to 3 subpixels of ONE pixel. The four pixels are exactly the same as the one in terms of RGB stripe, so how can the color range of FOUR pixels be any greater than one?

ONE PIXEL HAS 3 SUBPIXELS - RED GREEN AND BLUE. Likewise 4 pixels have 12 subpixels. End of story.
[Galaxy S II General] TheWarKeeper:
Yes that information is correct
[Galaxy S II General] TheWarKeeper:
Calm down... this is an explanation which youre attempting to turn into some sort of war.

Nothing youve added there corrects what ive said, it only repeats it with a more agressive attitude.

There semms to be a problem in communication here, perhaps from my part aswell, the original topic was about how 1 subpixel cant have both 2 colors.

Re-read the original reply torwards your first post.

EDIT: I see ppl started complaining when ive first posted about the 6 subpixel mistake so a late apology for that.

Ill try to Redo it again as my final reply to this thread:

This is OLED technology, there is no such thing as "oversaturation" this doesnt use a backlight, the blue, green and red pixels are made of light, LIGHT, they are not complemented by the lcd backlight as a tn or ips panel does... so colors will look alot more realistic with bigger contrast ratio, with pure blacks and whites.

The camera quality is clearly average at best compared to a proper professional HD Cam corder, so it couldnt properly interpret the oled panel as its made purely of light, its like taking a snapshot of the sun, youre gonna miss details around it.

And then theres your screen, i take it ure viewing it in a LCD screen instead of an oled right? u cant compare lcd vs oled viewed on a lcd screen because that will downgrade the quality of oled to an lcd, no brainer here.

In the marketing world LCD is awsome and beats everything around... the fact is that lcd is by far the worst technology for color reproduction and pixel response time.

When compared an OLED vs LCD in Real life the difference is so big that it will make u realise how overhyped the LCD technology was with its poorly reproduced colors and washed out contrast ratio

The only difference between a normal soled screen and samsung galaxy s2 superamoled plus is that it has 3 subpixels to form 1 full pixel while the other uses 4 subpixels to form a fully RGB pattern.

As for the 2 pictures displayed at post #16:

It is more than clear that the second image has been manipulated in a graphis software with more saturation, as the colors get pixelated and edges jaggy.

There is Contrast Ratio there is Saturation and there also is Color Gamut, these are independent specs by that i mean that those 3 specs are different from each other, each is responsable for picture quality but not the same.

The major faults with the picture comparison are:

For once, how can u see oled pure black (pixel turned off) on a screen that to display the picture it has to have the back light always on...

How do u expect a pure red color when you have a white bulb backlight? the same goes for blue and green...

The latter information of how more subpixels together acting as 1 full pixel improves color accuracy will be excluded so there will be no more confusion, if you want to know if its possible and how look it up.
[Galaxy S II General] mr_Ray:
Another sigh? Perhaps you are tired. If this is happening to you often, perhaps you should seek edical advice. Those pills you are quite clearly on might be giving you a sleep disorder.

No I don't. However, you keep gibbering on about some unrelated nonsense that contradicts the contents of your own links.

"6 subpixels.. no no no, 12 SUBPIXELS, yes my precious, it has 12 subpixels for us, my preciousss...." Your mind invented this nonsense.

If you cannot outright and clearly admit that you were wrong and deluded, and admit that every other person was correct in that the sAMOLED+ is has 3 subpixels per pixel then you are beyond hope. Can you admit this?

Huh wait what? No that's not true. You just have a 2x2 grid of rgb pixels. Also known in common tongue as "4 pixels".

What the hell has voltage regulation got to do with it? This is a simple maths issue. Draw a red line, a blue line and a green line next to each other and draw a box around them. Then count the number of lines in the box. Voltage regulation has nothing to do with simple maths.

And I will officially right here be willing to bet you £10,000 hard cash that said pixel will be comprised of exactly 1 red, one green, and one blue subpixel. Assuming you have such cash to hand and we can find a reliable and willing person to act as escrow, will you match my stake with your claim that there will be 12 subpixels lit?

That is correct and that is how the SGS has its screen set up.

Wrong. One will be red and green, the other will be blue and green

If Samsung's marketing of the screen as WVGA is to be believed, then each of the pairs (rg / bg) count as a pixel each.

More crazy references to voltage regulators?

Oh don#'t worry, your meaning is already more than distored enough as it is.When EVERYONE ELSE disagrees with you, do you ever wonder,"hmmm.. maybe it is me that is wrong"?

You said such things were impossible. You brought it up. But yes, it is off topic.

I look forward to hearing back from you on that bet. :)