yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Ririal:
Killing you how?

I'm working on getting the powermenu updates going as well. Already added in sideloading of apps and tethering APN fix. Will upload new version when I get it all finished.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] dasmoover:
Speed issues sir?
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Ririal:
Changed the name to avoid any confusion with Adeo and cleaned up the first post so it's pretty and stuff. Should have new version finished tonight.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] raybond25:
when it says "works with any phone" - is it confirmed that this works on Bell without difficulties as well?
[Atrix 4G Android Development] neer2005:
I dont think it will work on a Bell Atrix.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Ririal:
Whoops, that was supposed to read "any phone running 1.5.2" I'll update first post. I'm working on deodexed rom for Bell users right now, hopefully have at least the deodexing done tonight with something for you guys to run.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Julian713:
I'm new to all this. What exactly is this ROM? Anyone have any screenshots of this? I have a rooted Atrix (aRoot).
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Ririal:
The term "ROM" is being used pretty loosely here. If everyone else hadn't started calling this type of mod a ROM, I wouldn't be either :P

There's no need for screenshots since this doesn't change anything appearance-wise. It deodexes (search for what that means) and adds a few simple features. ROMs like Gingerblur do significantly more, like theme and replace parts of the OS with stuff from 2.3, etc.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Clienterror:
+1 thank you for explaining this to people, and as you say it isn't as phone changing as gingerblur it's still great your developing and I thank you very much for taking the time to give everyone another option.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] kennethpenn:
+1 as well.

DG kind of set the precedent by calling Adeo a ROM, so we've all been doing that in the Atrix forums. People should know that! Not a huge deal, though.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Athailias:
@ririal, and Ken

I am kind of laid up for a few weeks due to a back injury. If any of you guys need a tester, let me know. I have a backup phone (craptivate) and both sbf's for the Atrix, and have flashed them to confirm I have them working. I am currently on gingerblur 7.2 and not a total newb.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] dicksteele:
Killing me with slow download speed as offered up in post #22. I had a little better speed than that though.

I can post next version up on hotfile, filesonic or rapidshare if you'd like.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Ririal:
Updated for new version, feel free to mirror wherever, PM me or post links here and I'll add them to first post.

Check first post for updates.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] frankiedizzle87:
Fingerprint scanner doesn't work

Sent from Atrix ;-)
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Ririal:
Can you elaborate? Mine works fine.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] frankiedizzle87:
it says initializing finger print scanner now i cant even get past lockscreen because i can slide to unock either what do i do? it been on that screen since my last post maybe an hour. i dint do SBF but i will attempt to now but which should i do 1.2.6 or .15.6? or what ever the numbers are

?
[Atrix 4G Android Development] dasmoover:
You need to flash the OLYFR_U4_1.5.2 - attached link :)
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Ririal:
As stated in my first post, this is for users running the 1.5.2 SBF. If you flash this on a out-of-the-box atrix you'll run into strange issues like that.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Ririal:
Anyone who downloaded v0.2, there was a stupid bug in it that was causing some commands to not run correctly, so don't use it anymore. I'm uploading v0.3 now which has massive improvements to the installer.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Mustang302LX:
Just flash the 1.2.6 SBF as it's the retail SBF then you can run the normal Adeo or Gingerblur if you want. But you can also run the 1.5.6 SBF as well.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Ririal:
Mixing and matching versions isn't good. The reason I made this is because if you flash Adeo to the 1.5.2 SBF it causes strange bugs. This is for users who are on 1.5.2, but don't want all the extra gingerblur stuff and prefer to install it themselves.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Ririal:
GladiAtrix v0.3 is up. Verified everything is working correctly this time.

Next step is to migrate Adeo over for 1.2.6 support.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Crazed47:
any word on bell support yet?
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Ririal:
Not without a Bell SBF, no. I could probably put something together that has a chance of working, but I don't want to be responsible for bricking any devices that won't be able to be restored. If/when an SBF becomes available to Bell users, I will update with Bell support.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Always_Jonezen:
How do I find out what version im running sorry im new to android software coming apple firmware.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] shawnbuck:
Check in Settings > About phone. At the bottom will be build number.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] just_mike:
Any ideas as to when this will work 1.5.7 or should try and revert to 1.5.2
[Atrix 4G Android Development] raybond25:
OP, if you would be kind enough to update the first post with a disclaimer not to try to install this on Bell devices it would be much appreciated. If people have been paying close attention to the forums, then they would know

however, as we all know not everyone can read every post made and the fact that this is AT&T specific might not be noticed if it isn't directly in the post.

Just as a safeguard, and courtesy to the Bell users who use this forum and might not have noticed/know that this is AT&T specific

Thanks
[Atrix 4G Android Development] Ririal:
It's clearly stated in the op:

I'm not sure what else you want me to do. No offense, but if users can't be bothered to read the entire post before doing something as risky as installing a custom ROM, they shouldn't be installing the ROM in the first place.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] raybond25:
alright, I was just suggesting that maybe it could be explicitly stated "DO NOT INSTALL ON BELL ATRIX", because if someone's going to do that, they might rationalize that the Atrix is essentially the same device despite the slight differences due to carrier

all I was saying, but i suppose it is stated in somewhat plain words already
[Atrix 4G Android Development] poeticdecision:
Confused is this for the update that went ota???? does it give root???
[Atrix 4G Android Development] filmusikat:
Will version 1.5.7 work for this?
[Atrix 4G Android Development] raybond25:
will not give root, for the OTA version of GladiAtrix see this thread

see this thread, you need root prior to installing it though, look for the 1.5.7 root methods if you aren't rooted yet.
[Atrix 4G Android Development] zeidof:
Installer?????

Helo guys

i have aquestion, can i install this rom with RSD LITE 5?

if not, please introduse an installer or a link to download

thx
[Atrix 4G Android Development] zeidof:
install.bat

where is install.bat? i cannot find that
[Atrix 4G Android Development] roharia:
1. I know this has been said but whenever I reboot my phone

it has me login to motoblur.

2. My battery is remarkably worse! And the phone will not allow the screen to timeout, whenever I try to change it- it switches back to the" never" option always!

Other that that everything seems good!
[HD7 General] TechJunkiesCA:
EDIT: Below is important if your phone is still branded. This link guides you to the nodo update. This is for real. Working for me!!!

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1012189

Hey everyone, I came accross this post on everythingWM. I am with TMOUS and tried this method for NoDo; it did not work for me. It did however update my device to the 7008 ver which was 7004 before. I hope this is more helpful to others than it was for me.:)

1.Download this zip file and deploy the 3 xap files onto your device.

2.Run the ChevronWP7.Ringtones.xap and wait till it displays “Ringtones added… and CustClear.provxml underneath”

3.Run the TouchXplorer app, navigate to My DocumentsMy Ringtones click on CustClear.provxml and select Copy from the Application Bar.

4.Navigate back inside TouchXplorer to the Windows folder.

5.Select paste from the Application Bar, this should scroll right to the bottom and put a copy of CustClear.provxml in the Windows folder.

6.Now run the Connection Setup application and click on the Ok button (it’s the one with the tick).

And now you’re done and free to re-connect to Zune and check for updates.

http://www.everythingwm.com/how-to-bypass-your-carrier-and-grab-nodo-with-an-htc/2011/03/23/
[HD7 General] bofett:
Same for me, only 7008 :-(
[HD7 General] ericman77:
What's the difference in 7008 ?
[HD7 General] TechJunkiesCA:
Nothing really. It was an update to the update process.
[HD7 General] Jragar:
followed this through to the letter and didnt work for me
[HD7 General] VizagDude:
Help

How do I deploy those files into my device? Via Zune?

A step-by-step guide is really appreciated.
[HD7 General] TechJunkiesCA:
You cant use Zune, you use Windows Phone Developer Tools. Here is a great link showing how to get your device unlocked and get apps deployed onto your device:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=938106

The basic run down is:

Unlock Device (Chevron WP7 Unlocker)

Download and install Windows Phone Developer Tools on your PC

Once that is done you will be able to deploy .XAP files (apps) like the ones linked at the top of this post. Good luck
[HD7 General] ecyoral:
same here 7008
[HD7 General] TechJunkiesCA:
I’m actually bummed that these are the types of threads we are forced to scour with WP7; desperate for updates. I want an Energy ROM with crazy icons! lol. Crack
[HD7 General] mofotrucker:
same here.... need an Energy ROM pronto..hehehe:D
[HD7 General] professorwol:
got the same results as OP

Thank you for the preupdate 7008!!

hopefully t mobile releases the update soon enough
[HD7 General] Twistedme:
This method worked for me to get the 7008 update.

nodo hasnt been unleashed to the us market yet so anyone checking for it in the us wont get it branded or unbranded.

need to follow the info located here in main wp7 thread.

I think you need to modify the custclear.provxml from blank to 000-88 and then use the info in the following link.

Basicly you use a proxy to connect to a european ip that then checks microsoft update site and allows you to pull the March 2011 update. I now have nodo on my factory hd7.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1012189.
[HD7 General] drky:
force update

hi sence you have the 7008 update you can force update via zune...

I did, on unlock htc hd7 TMO-US check link.:)

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1012189
[HD7 General] TechJunkiesCA:
Here is the link for nodo!!! Working

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1012189
[XPERIA X10 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] xxcysxx:
Hello everyone,

My x10 screen is kinda jumpy when i initially slide my finger on the screen. like on the home screen or in web browser, if i pick my finger up and place it back down then slowly slide it, it take about 3 or 4 milimeters before the touch is register and the rest of the screen suddenly jumps to the position where the finger is. But if i leave my finger on the screen and slide it around it does not jump anymore, its only when i pick my finger up and place it back down, its like the touch has a dead band or something and doesn't get register until it is slide away at a certain radius from where it was initially started.

Like on an iphone, the touch is register right away as soon as my finger is placed on the screen. like when i place my finger on the screen and make a really small slide movement the screen will respond to even the smallest finger movement. but on the x10 i have to slide my finger for a small distance for the screen to acknowledge the presence of the touch and then the screen jumps to the position.

It might not bother some of you but it make it look not smooth in scrolling.

is there anyway to make it to the screen acknowledge the touch right away.

Thanks
[XPERIA X10 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Bruce Lee:
What firmware 1.6 or 2.1 r u running or ROMS r u running?

Sent from XDA Premium from my X10a rooted running 2.2.1 CM Rom from Rendeiro2005
[XPERIA X10 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] xxcysxx:
I'm using the stock sony ericsson 2.1 firmware with jit mod.

Are you not experiencing this twitchy effect on your device?
[XPERIA X10 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Bruce Lee:
No i am not. What version of jit do u have?

Jit is probably doin that

Sent from XDA Premium from my X10a rooted running 2.2.1 CM Rom from Rendeiro2005
[XPERIA X10 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] xxcysxx:
That's strange. well how do i know what version of jit do i have. can i uninstall it?

The jumpy effect i'm talking about is, let say on you main screen, then you pick up your finger and place it back down onto the screen and then slowly slide it about two or three milimeter to the left or the right, the scrolling desktop doesn't acknowledge the touch right away until you slide your finger a little further than about three milimeter away from the original position where you first place your finger, then the desktop scrolling just suddenly jumps right into position. It hapen on all scrolling in everywhere else too, not just the desktop screen. the scrolling doesn't start as soon as you place the finger on the screen.

But as long as i keep my finger on the screen to scroll around its fine, its just when i pick up my finger and place it back down again when it reinitialize the touch again.
[XPERIA X10 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ImS0Raw:
Everyone with a 2.1 ROM has it. It's because of the FPS cap. When bootloader gets cracked this will be fixed ;)
[XPERIA X10 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] fiscidtox:
You need to tweak the maxeventspersecond in the build prop to 260...

Makes a huge diff!

Search maxevents on here to find the exact line to add to your build prop...

Or just switch to cm 6.1.3 by wolfbreak :P
[XPERIA X10 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] fiscidtox:
windowsmgr.max_events_per_sec=260

Add that to your build prop
[XPERIA X10 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] xxcysxx:
just tried that windowsmgr.max_events_per_sec=260 trick. it only made the scrolling smoother. but the touch acknowlegement from the screen is still the same. i had to slide my finger for about two to three milimeters for the screen to respond. when i do it fast it look smooth. but when i do it slow i can see the screen just suddenly snaps into position when i slide my finger just a little bit.

somehow i have a feeling sony ericsson use a cheap technology digitiger for the x10.

oh well.
[XPERIA X10 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] fiscidtox:
Try froyo.. wolfbreaks cm 6.1.3 is smooth as silk. I have none of the issues you describe, my touchscreen reacts instantly
[XPERIA X10 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Bwyan Benton:
Hey i wanna try that....where in build.prop do i add it? At the very end?
[XPERIA X10 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] fiscidtox:
yes on mine it's the third last line
[XPERIA X10 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Bwyan Benton:
Yeah, i should have edited my post. Got it in there, scrolling does seem better. Wolfs rom is still untouchable tho.
[LG Optimus 3D] young3g:
Now that the evo 3D has been revealed are u still geting the the optimus 3D ?

Hands on review http://www.phonearena.com/news/HTC-EVO-3D-Hands-on_id17611
[LG Optimus 3D] george232:
Depends what phone makes it to the stores sooner, but I'd prefer the EVO judging from the specs.
[LG Optimus 3D] wouwout:
960x540 resolution on HTC is the advantage imho
[LG Optimus 3D] XartzMAX:
EVO 3D for sure
[LG Optimus 3D] Hero Yu:
Well I would get the evolution 3d but sadly no gsm... :(

So I'll be picking me up an official 3d
[LG Optimus 3D] HDD_x8:
Same size, same weight, but higher res screen.

CPU and GPU seems to be a lot slower, first benchmarks on prototype hardware shows that Tegra 2 is 50% faster.

http://smartphonebenchmarks.com/for...60-smartbench-2011-result-have-been-revealed/
[LG Optimus 3D] zedklind:
honestly judging from the benchmarks i would prefer the LG. Its sad to see htc lag behind with their qualcomm because they make great products. Just the build quality is amazing with htc. Ive also heard that the new qualcomm chips have signed and locked bootloaders :/. The qualcomm msm8660 and 8260 are both dualcore arm cortex a8 and the .2 overclocked compaired to other dualcores just doesnt make up for the lack of performance and power comsumption gain.
[LG Optimus 3D] wouwout:
You've got to be kidding. The less than stellar benchmark results are based on 1 benchmark from a prototype? Possibly fake? Let's wait and see what the evo 3d will do.
[LG Optimus 3D] HDD_x8:
Joke or not, it looks slow.

Smartbench uses several 2D/3D routines to calculate an index, so it is not one benchmark, it is several ones.

May be fake, we'll see soon enough, CPU should show up in several phones soon.

Another advantage of the Evo 3D is the inter-camera distance, lenses seen to be further apart. Should bring little more depth to objects further away.

Evo 3D looks 3 mm shorther and 3 mm slimmer too. Same weight though.

The slightly bigger battery at 1700mah vs 1500mah needs testing to check the battery times. Maybe the screen needs more juice...
[LG Optimus 3D] fen_nyc:
GSM is a big deal for me too; too bad, this is a nice Evo refresh. Also, if you're a fan of Google Voice, the Sprint network has an edge in that dept.

Here are my thoughts on the features of the LG Optimus 3D Vs. HTC Evo 3D:

OS: Like the 2x, the Optimus 3D runs Froyo. An update has been mentioned often by LG & should be released soon after the phones have gone retail. The Evo 3D has the latest update.

CPU: Up for grabs right now, but LG's TI OMAP shows alot of promise. Again, we just met the Evo 3D- still both phones are very fast.

RAM: HTC has twice the RAM @ 1 GIG. Yet, LG's 2x & the 3D are top 5 in most benches w/ only 512. Dual channel or not, I've brought this up before, maybe 512 is enough after all?

Build: HTC probably has a better build- shaped like the stellar Evo, its parts are smooth & has some weight when handled. The previews for LG's 3D & its 2x has been relatively positive. Nothing ground breaking, but conservatively simple & elegant.

Camera: Both are dual 5mp on the backside & I think 1.3mp on the front. The difference is that the Evo has a dedicated shutter button & 2x LED flashes.

UI: LG's UI overlay is rather weak compared to the Sense- but that's a two-edged sword being that so little is in fact added to LG's UI, it's not bloated w/ company widgets, apps, or questionable OS modifications. That's cool or cheap of them, hehe. The new Sense UI IMO, looks great.

Display: HTC has a winner here. LG's screen is great, though just not Samsung, HTC, Apple, "great" where their phones have continually put out awesome displays. The Evo 3D screen is slightly thinner & taller because HTC believes this aspect ratio is the proper size. Both phones are within 4.3 inch category.

Battery: The Optimus 3D has a Li-Ion 1500 mAh while the Evo 3D includes a 1730 mAh battery.

3D: The only negative words about 3D for these phones stem from the public- which do not have access to test these two devices. Which does it better? There are those that care & I hope the media makes a statement on this topic.

Extras: Both phones have HDMI ports, can record 3D in 720p & 2D in 1080p.

IMO, both phones are great devices considering they're first to jump in the 3D market. I'm looking forward to the Optimus- hopefully early spring!
[LG Optimus 3D] zedklind:
Great comparison! You have to remember something though... all the new htc phones have signed and locked bootloaders.. the evo 3d might come with 2.3 from the get go but the optimus 3d (thrill) will probably have 2.3 custom roms ready to go before its US release because devs in UK. And something else to remember.. rooted and custom rom available phones get updates first. Why the users on evo 3d are waiting for htc to send out a sense based 2.4, people on optimus 3d will already have a stock version custom rom.
[LG Optimus 3D] sta1cs:
Yes, nice comparison fen_nyc!

I'm looking forward to the Optimus 3D, mostly because I have no choice :P

There's no AWS 3G of the Evo 3D :(
[LG Optimus 3D] peachpuff:
I don't understand why these companies don't make their phones compatible on as many carriers as possible, would it hurt htc to make another evo3d that has the same 3g bands as the optimus 3d and would instantly work on att/tmo? I love what samsung did with the original galaxy s line, every single carrier had these phones.
[LG Optimus 3D] xHausx:
All htc phones have signed updates and locked bootloaders... Afaik nothing is new, just some blogs picked it up thinking there was something special about it.
[LG Optimus 3D] sta1cs:
It definitely wouldn't hurt them in terms of customer appreciation or choice but I believe it is a but more complex than that, HTC may have signed some exclusivity deals with Sprint because I have yet to see the device announced for other carriers (correct me if I'm wrong).

Yes it's disappointing to see they did that even though it's just business, I will second guess ever buying from them anymore especially after they made me pay for shipping on the warranty RMA or the fact that the phone broke out of nowhere.
[LG Optimus 3D] cloths55:
good write-up.

I think the only decision for me is to either choose the optimus 3d for the dual channel memory, or the evo 3d for the qhd display.
[LG Optimus 3D] george232:
Signed bootloader is a no-go, even more if the specs are fantastic like this. Imagine a monster like the EVO 3D and HTC stops updating it after 6 months. Horrible.
[LG Optimus 3D] fen_nyc:
How will these Roms work w/ the Evo's or the Optimus' 3D software/hardware? It's a new window for developers & it's unclear what the level of progress will be like. Again, these are the only 2 devices set to effectively be released this year & if you're the minority, & furthermore knowing how the general public are split on the concept of 3D, the community may not adopt to these phones as quickly as we'll like.

Thanks, I have to say though, LG's 3D is no slouch. I know, I know that HTC has a more favorable release history w/ their devices- but look up some videos of the Optimus 3D in action. The screen is very tech worthy. The outer body is nicely rugged to stabilize camera usage & I forgot to mention, that while it lacks a shutter button that's present on the Evo, there is a cool "3D" button on the side of the phone which opens up LG's neat 3D carousel menu. It's very functional!

It all comes down to exclusivity & Sprint has the Evo line locked down. If I recall, upon the official unveiling of the Incredible, it was considered by the press to be the Evo's little brother now in Verizon's camp- it’s certainly different, but the general design (hardware & Sense UI) is similar.

Now a few notable downsides for 3D phones:

1. Power Draw: Battery life should be an issue. For instance, the Optimus G2X & the 3D both are powered at 1500 mAh. Yet comparing normal usage through 3D gaming & viewing 3D videos Vs. that of the G2X... you really need to wonder.

2. Photo & Video Enthusiasts: If video recording & capturing stills is more of a passion to you than the addition of a 3D "experience" on a smart phone; in terms of a 1-2 year investment, this may not be the product for you. Camera lens tech on 3D phones will never be on par or outpace regular 2D phones- I just don't see it happening. A 5MP lens on each the Evo & the Optimus Vs. the 8MP lens mounted on the G2X & an 8.1MP listed on the soon to be released Sony Arc & well, the trend is clear...

3. Cost: It's not about being an early adopter anymore. 3D inclusion is now recognized as an "extra," like thumbing in a surround-sound speaker option for a newly purchased car. Expect anywhere from $100-$200 markup compared to a similarly spec'ed phone minus the 3D.

4. Application Support: How will developers respond? Will there be simultaneously launches for application & videos? A price bump for 3D content...? Oh, that I'm quite sure of...;)