"Then just before he comes back I hurry round tidying everything up for his return."

— James Wilkinson

# A SPECIAL GUIDE TO CARVING LAMB

## How to carve a lamb.

As all the good cooks say, a badly carved joint can be the unkindest cut of all.

There are several points to bear in mind while carving:—

It is essential that the knife is sharp; it should be sharpened every time before use.

Joints are easier to carve when allowed to stand in a warm oven for 10-15 minutes after cooking.

Lamb is best when the slices are carved at not less than ¼ inch thick. If sliced too thin, much of the flavour is lost.

Good carving is good economy and the following illustrations are suggested to help you get the most out of each joint.

Knowing the way round the bones will give you good slices and fewer wasteful small pieces.

**Best end:** Cut down along each rib bone and serve as cutlets. If a thicker portion is required cut between alternate bones. Roast loin of lamb is served the same way.

**Leg:** Make two close cuts through the centre of the leg, converging on the bone. Continue slicing from both sides of the first cut and then turn the joint over, remove bits of fat and carve along the length of the bone.

**Shoulder:** First carve a long slice, about ¼" thick, down to the bone in the centre of the joint and continue slicing each side of the cut, taking smaller slices over the bladebone.

Cut horizontally toward the shank bone until all meat is removed from the top and then turn the joint over, continuing horizontal cuts. (For a boned shoulder carve downward slices about ¼" thick.)

ING STANDARD

WOMANSCOPE

House
of Heim
opens
again

AT A time when handmade high fashion is dwindling, the House of Jacques Heim had the courage to reopen on Monday.

The Heim Salon, now entering its seventh decade, made another new start with newcomer Serge Lepage, 35, presenting a collection of clothes of the classic, elegant school.

Under the late Jacques Heim and earlier his father, the house closed during the two world wars and shut its doors again a year after Jacques Heim died in 1967.

Heim's son, Philippe, told the crowd of international fashion press and buyers at the reopening in the Plaza Athenee Hotel Ballroom that he had decided to go into business again because "the high fashion label of Jacques Heim lives in the memories of millions of women."

Heim's widow, Simone, stood quietly in the doorway watching the show. She said, "It's with great emotion" that

Just right for spring

the short dress

L.C.J.

VALENTINO, the uncrowned king of Italian high fashion, brought back the short evening dress last week in a romantic collection for spring and summer.

The designer, favourite couturier of Jacqueline Onassis, showed what he called "the small dress" in georgette and chiffon with matching jacket.

The line was narrow with a fitted bodice, sometimes banded under the bosom, but Valentino was lavish with ruffles, tucks and faggoting – an openwork stitch often used on tableclothes.

His newest look was a variation on the dolman sleeve which he said he modelled after dragonfly

wings.

It appeared on slim coats, suit jackets and long chiffon evening gowns with small intricate prints in rust, green, gold and brown derived from the work of the Austrian expressionist Gustav Klimt.

Long pastel evening gowns were ruffled and sprinkled with the violets that were the signature of the collection.

Many tops were cut like slips or nightgowns but had wide ruffled stoles to cover the shoulders.

The keynote colours were white, cocoa brown, pale mauve, pistachio and yellow and a bright copen blue.

Best End

Leg

Shoulder

9 NOV 1974

Dear Mr. Minister:

Thank you for your kind reception and for the
thoughtful program you arranged for our visit in
New Delhi. We resumed our journey with a much deeper
understanding of India and an abiding affection for
the Indian people.

I am thankful that we had an opportunity to
explore the state of Indo-American relations as well
as a wide range of international issues. These
contacts effectively are of great importance in
achieving our common objective of seeking improved
relations and building a more secure and peaceful
world.

I look forward to working with you in the months
ahead in the belief that together we can further
strengthen the friendship between our peoples and
the prospects for world peace.

I also want to thank you for the gifts which you
so kindly presented to me and Mrs. Kissinger. They
will be constant reminders of our visit with you.

His Excellency
Y. B. Chavan,
Minister of External Affairs,
New Delhi.

New Delhi.
Minister of External Affairs,
Y. B. Ghavan,
His Excellency

Henry A. Klaasen

Best regards,

will be constant reminders of our visit with you.
so kindly presented to me and Mrs. Klaasen. They
I also want to thank you for the attestation which you

the broadeers for world peace.
strengthen the friendliness between our peoples and
speed in the belief that together we can further
I look forward to working with you in the months
world.

relations and building a more secure and peaceful
achieving our common objective of seeking improved
contacts effectively are of great importance in
as a wide range of international issues. These
explores the state of Indo-American relations as well
I am thankful that we had an opportunity to

the Indian people.
understanding of India and an spiking attraction for
New Delhi. We reamed our journey with a much deeper
thoughtful broadeen you arranged for our visit in
Thank you for your kind reception and for the

Dear Mr. Minister:

9 NOV 1974

[LC]

Pitaw

Executive Director
The Research Institute of America, Inc.
589 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017

December 27, 1972

The Honorable Henry A. Kissinger
Assistant to the President
for National Security Affairs
The White House
Washington, D. C. 20500

Dear Henry:

Cy Sulzburger's column on December 24th, "A Shrewdness of Kissingers," leads me to make a suggestion. If there is any merit in it, it is not a thought which can be acted on at this moment, since it does involve something in the nature of an interview. If there is any Italian aspect to it, let me quickly assure you my thought owes more to Fellini than Fallaci.

Since I am sure you have read the piece, let me just repeat that Sulzberger singles Henry Kissinger and Egon Bahr as two of a very small group of men who are playing a rather singular and remarkably constructive role in relation to their respective Chief Executives and in altering the frozen foreign policies and postures of their respective countries. Sulzberger continues and suggests that Harry Hopkins, Mac Bundy and Walt Rostow played similar roles. I personally do not think so. In fact, by linking these able men with the two of you, I do think that in a sense he is misunderstanding the uniqueness of the contribution which both of you have made or are making. But that distinction is not central to the thought I am proposing.

Let me proceed, therefore, directly to my suggestion. After the present problems have been dissipated, which I do hope will be very soon, and when the pressure upon you is somewhat lighter, I am sure there will be an occasion which will require Egon Bahr to come to Washington or which will take you to Bonn. I have known both of you for a number of years and my admiration and affection are greater than that measure of time. I would like to be present on such an occasion wherever and whenever it occurs, solely for the purpose of stimulating, guiding and recording a conversation between the two of you as each of you reflects on the similarities and differences in your respective roles and, to the extent

-2-

it is prudently possible, your respective relationships to
the men you each serve, and on the altered world as you have
observed it and affected it.

I would particularly want to press both of you to reflect
on and discuss your origins, the thoughts and forces which
have shaped you and the way in which each of you has emerged
from a desperate and traumatic interval of history quite
differently from so many others who were shaped by the traumas
of the 30's and 40's. I want less to interview both of you
than to spark what I am certain will be a unique conversation.

Let me now quickly add that, if this thought has any
virtue, it is not with a view to early publication. The
prospect of such exposure to the public view would likely
lead you both to be a great deal more cautious and less re-
vealing of significant but still sensitive observations than
would be the case if publication were long delayed. It may
in fact be that either or both of you would not wish to have
the conversation published at all. That would be entirely
acceptable to me. History, however, deserves an opportunity
to eavesdrop on such an exchange. I know of no other parallel
dialogue.

I am not writing to Egon Bahr until I have an indication
from you that this is worth carrying forward.

I close with a New Year's wish. May 1973 see completed
what was so ably advanced in 1972!

With my warm regards,

New Delhi.
Ministry of External Affairs,
Chief of Protocol,
2.J.S. Christwal,
His Exchequency

Henry A. Klaasen

Beat regards,

has been achieved.

better understanding between our two countries
we left India personally convinced that
at all for those efforts, and assure you that
We thank you and the members of your
success.

efforts which are required to make it a
which precedes such a visit and the selfless
We are well aware of the elaborate planning
hospitality during our visit to New Delhi.
Mrs. Klaasen and I appreciated your

Dear Mr. Christwal:

3 NOV 1974

248346 STATE UR

ZCZC YWB360 RML1077 FBC1057 KSB127
URWN CO KRSE 034
SEOUL 34 27 1000

RECEIVED

27 MAY 1974 03 15

THE HONORABLE HENRY A KISSINGER SECRETARY OF STATE
WASHINGTON DC

I EXTEND MY GENUINE CONGRATULATIONS ON YOUR BIRTHDAY HOPE
THE YEAR WILL BRING YOU SUCCESS HEALTH PROSPERITY
WORLD PEACE AND A CHILD
JOEY CHO

THE KOREAN INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES

K. P. O. Box 426, Seoul, Korea; Cable Address 1234, Seoul
Tel. 72-7707, 75-2589

Dr. Henry A. Kissinger
Special Assistant to the President
The White House
Washington, D.C.

March 31, 1972

Dear Dr. Kissinger:

It is with great pleasure that I write to you to
introduce our institution, to invite you to associate
with us, and to extend an invitation to you to visit
Korea at some time in the future.

The Korean Institute of International Studies (KIIS) is a private, non-profit organization founded for the purpose of promoting and publishing research on international affairs, especially as they relate to the Korean situation, in the hope that such activity will have a positive effect on the direction of national and international developments. Over 90 Korean professors residing in Korea and 15 professors abroad are associates of the KIIS. In addition, 25 foreign scholars are presently serving on our International Advisory Board. These scholars periodically participate in conferences and seminars sponsored by the Institute and contribute articles to our bi-lingual publication, *The Korean Journal of International Studies*.

At this time I would like to invite you to join our
Institute as a member of the International Advisory Board.
Among the prominent American scholars serving at this
time on the Board are Zbigniew Brzezinski, Edwin O. Rei-
schauer, Robert A. Scalapino and Raymond Aron of France.
Board members are invited to occasionally contribute
articles to our Journal and when the opportunity arises
to join us here in Seoul for a seminar or conference.
We would be most honored to welcome you to the Advisory
Board.

At the same time, I would like to extend an open
invitation to you to come to Korea at some convenient
future date in order to join some of the associates of
the KIIS in an unofficial and informal seminar. Such a
meeting of overall developments in East Asia, on American
policy in the area and the special situation of the

THE SECRETARY OF STATE
WASHINGTON

April 25, 1975

Dear Mr. Christopher:

I apologize for the lateness of my response to your letter of March 26. You will understand, I know, that the last several weeks have been hectic here in Washington, making it difficult to take the time to prepare the thoughtful reply your letter deserves.

Let me state at the outset that I hope my answers to the legitimate questions you have asked will be couched in a less emotional manner than is apparent in your own letter, which I can only describe in tone -- if not content -- as unnecessarily rude.

As I see it, you have asked three questions:

-- Why have we unilaterally abandoned Greece?

-- Did we violate the 1961 Foreign Assistance Act?

-- Did I have actual foreknowledge of the Cyprus invasion?

With regard to the first question, I am unprepared to concede that we have, in fact, abandoned Greece. My relationship with Prime Minister Caramanlis, since he took office, has been warm and friendly and has grown more so with the passing of time. He is, I believe, one of the outstanding leaders of the democratic world, and the United States has every intention of doing all it can to support him in his efforts to strengthen Greek democracy. The issue is not, nor has it ever been one of abandoning Greece in favor of Turkey. Rather the issue is how we may best maintain a position which will make it possible for us to use our influence with Turkey to bring about a settlement on Cyprus. Our purpose is a

Mr. George Christopher,
President,
Christopher Commercial Corp.,
555 Stonecrest Drive,
San Francisco, California.

-2-

settlement that protects the interests of Turkey and Greece, and brings an end to the suffering and agony of the people of Cyprus.

This latter point is too often missed by those of you who see the present situation largely as one of confrontation between Greece and Turkey. Our purpose has always been to do all we can to see that Greece and Turkey, as NATO allies, maintain a relationship of openness and dialogue, if not friendship. Equally, it has always been our purpose to bring about a settlement of the centuries-old Cyprus dispute as rapidly and as equitably as possible in order to end the suffering on the Island. It is not Greece, nor is it Turkey, that has paid most heavily over the past year. Rather it is the people of Cyprus. And they can only be helped if we are able to maintain a dialogue with both Greece and Turkey, and if we are in a position to influence both toward a reasonable and early settlement.

I would note further that we remained silent immediately after the Athens-inspired overthrow of Makarios last July precisely because we did not want to make statements which would encourage Turkey to invade the Island. This, at the time, led to charges that we were pro-Greek. Now, because of our concern for the continued stability and viability of the NATO Alliance, and our desire to maintain influence on the Government of Turkey through the continuance of a military assistance program, we are charged with pro-Turkish sentiments. It is interesting how time and changed circumstances also change the perceptions of those who seem unprepared to look sympathetically at the broader interests of the United States.

I shall let your remark that I have acted "on behalf of . . . personal friends in Turkey" pass, since it is needlessly offensive and unworthy of comment.

As to the question of whether we violated the 1961 Foreign Assistance Act, I would only say that we have not. At the time of the Turkish invasion of Cyprus, we ceased making any new commitments on arms shipments to Turkey; we did, however, permit items already in the pipeline

- 3 -

to be delivered. We did not at any time make any public announcement of our decision to make no new commitments because we did not wish publicly to confront the Government of Turkey, thereby inevitably reducing our influence on that government's actions in Cyprus. We have never violated the law and we have no intention of violating the law. Nevertheless, it is my view that the absolute embargo on arms shipments to Turkey which has been imposed upon us by the Congress can only, if it is permitted to continue, undermine stability and peace in the Eastern Mediterranean, cause untold damage to the long-term relationship between Greece and Turkey, and grossly weaken our ability to influence the outcome of the negotiations aimed at settling the Cyprus dispute.

I did not have "foreknowledge of the Cyprus invasion." Such a statement is an outrageous lie. As I indicated above, we remained silent in the face of the junta-inspired overthrow of Makarios precisely because we did not want to encourage an invasion of the Island. At the same time, I did send Under Secretary Sisco to London, Athens and Ankara to head off what we knew would be a severe Turkish reaction to Samson's coup.

I can only assume that your elliptical comment about having chastised a certain diplomat refers to Ambassador Tasca. He was not "chastised." He did a fine job in Greece and is a superb diplomat. When he retired after more than five years as Ambassador in Athens, he left the Service with my thanks and best wishes.

I hope the above will be useful in responding to the many queries you say you have received.

Sincerely,

THE WHITE HOUSE

WASHINGTON

November 16, 1973

Dear Mr. Secretary:

Various groups are starting to indicate their
support of the President around the country.
We are sending as many Presidential letters of
appreciation as we can, but the support is
increasing at such a pace that we will not be
able to acknowledge all groups that have sponsored
rallies, TV spots, etc.

When a group that is part of your departmental
constituency involves itself in a support the
President activity, would you please acknowledge
that activity by a personal telephone call or a
letter of appreciation.

The Honorable Henry A. Kissinger
Secretary of State
2201 C Street, N. W.
Washington, D. C. 20520

ADMINISTRATIVELY CONFIDENTIAL/EYES ONLY

[lc]

18 December 1972

Colonel John M. Collins, USA (Ret)
1001 Priscilla Lane
Alexandria, Virginia 22308

Dear Dr. Kissinger:

The U.S. Naval Institute will shortly publish a book for me which tentatively is entitled *Strategy in Perspective*. It is intended as a guide for aspiring strategists, in that it tells readers *how* to think about strategy, but does not tell them *what*.

I request permission to include the following excerpt from remarks you delivered extemporaneously before National War College alumni at a luncheon on 4 December 1970:

> Before I was in office, I found nothing more boring, and infuriating in fact, than a high official who met with outsiders and told them that all choices had been considered, that the best possible policy was being pursued, and that if outsiders only knew as much as he did, they would of course come to the same conclusion. I am here to tell you that all options have been considered, the best possible ones have been chosen, and if you only knew as much as I do, we could dispense with the question period!

To put that in context, the following paragraph reads: He was being facetious, of course. The Nixon administration has done a monumental job reviewing U.S. grand strategy, but estimators in the White House, the National Security Council, the Departments of State and Defense, and the Joint Chiefs of Staff are mere mortals who *may* have overlooked some options and *certainly* were compelled to compromise on most decisions.

The White House
Washington

1972 DEC 30 PM 12 14

WHB2 12 (12 15) (2-177 14 3E 365)PD 12/30/72 12 15

ICS IPMRNCZ CSP

ZCZC 2133963302 TORN VENICE CA 14 12-30 1215P EST

PMS DR HENRY KISSINGER, QUICKEST WAY AND DLR, DLR
WHITE HOUSE DC

CIRCE AND I WILL HAVE NO OTHER GOD BEFORE ME. EVER, GOOD LUCK.

THE HEAD, OF THE CIAHAP MANTIUS, AETIOLOGIST

FORM 0805 PRINTED BY THE STANDARD REGISTER COMPANY U.S.A.

RECEIVED
KISSINGER'S OFFICE

1973 JAN 4 PM 2 26

THE HEAD, OF THE CIA, HAD MENTION, A FILOGIST.

CIRCLED AND I WILL HAVE NO OTHER GOD BEFORE ME. EVER. GOOD LUCK.
WHILE HOUSE DO

BMS DR HENRY KISSINGER, QUICKEST WAY AND DLR, DLR
SGSC 513396338S TOBY VENICE CA 14 15-30 15126 EST
IC2 15MBNO3 G2B

WHBS 15 (15 12) (5-12) 14E 362) 20 15/30/75 1512

[L]

Reception Robert Taft Residence (Following dinner)

Attendance

Allman, Thomas Y. & Mrs.

Aronoff, Stanley J. & Mrs.

Bennis, Dr. Warren G. & Mrs.

Bullock, John R. & Mrs.

Burchenal, Ralph R. & Mrs.

Chatfield, Henry H. & Mrs.

Conroy, Andrew J. Sr. & Mrs.

Dale, Francis L. & Mrs.

Emerson, H. Truxton, Jr. & Mrs.

Fleischmann, Joan

Gamble, David G. (Priscilla) Mrs.

Givelber, Samuel H.

Graham, William J. Jr. & Mrs.

Hall, Joseph B. & Mrs.

Hamilton, Frank T. & Mrs.

Hamilton, H. (Herb) & Mrs.

Harness, Edward G.

Hobson, Henry W. Jr. & Mrs.

Hollister, John B. & Mrs.

Keating, William J. & Mrs.

Kelley, John J. Jr. & Mrs.

Knowles, Dr. & Mrs. Harvey

Lawrence, John T. Jr. & Mrs.

Lazarus, Fred III & Mrs. Irma

LeBlond, Daniel W. & Mrs.

Mack, Edgar J. Jr. & Mrs.

Marx, Graham E. & Mrs.

Mechem, Charles S. Jr. & Mrs.

Moore, Mrs. Alexander

Reed, C. Lawson Jr. & Mrs.

Rogers, Lawrence H. II & Mrs.

Rich, Jerome & Mrs.

Rowe, John J. Jr. & Mrs.

Rowe, Stanley M. Sr. & Mrs.

Rowe, William S. II & Mrs.

Sticht, J. Paul & Mrs.

Swigert, J. Mack & Mrs.

Taft, Charles P.

Page 2

Taft, Dudley & Mrs.

Taft, Mrs. Hulbert Sr.

Tate, Mrs. Benjamin E.

Verity, C. William Jr. & Mrs.

Warrington, John & Mrs.

Whittaker, H. W. (Harry) & Mrs.

Whittaker, David A. & Mrs.

Whittaker, William J. & Mrs.

Williams, William J.

Wulsin, Dr. & Mrs. John

he said that America was the most gra-
cious of all the Nations in the world,
seeking neither tribute nor ransom from
friend or foe.

Those words mean something. Words
by themselves may not make a change in
policy, but I would imagine that in many
ways the charge and the encouragement
that have been given by forceful state-
ments of policy, either in speeches or in
legislation, have really changed the whole
course not alone of nations, but of the
world.

Would the chairman be willing to in-
clude, in section 603(b), the statement
that the recommendations would include
proposed constitutional amendments,
legislative and administrative actions,
and the desirability and feasibility of a
Department of Peace?

[Distrubance in the galleries.]

The PRESIDING OFFICER. The gal-
leries will be in order.

The time of the Senator from Indiana
has expired.

Mr. FULBRIGHT. Mr. President, how
much time do I have remaining?

The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Sen-
ator from Arkansas has 25 minutes re-
maining.

Mr. HARTKE. I asked this question of
the Senator when he was consulting with
his aide: Would the Chairman be willing
to include in section 603(b), after the
word "legislation," the words "a study of
the desirability and feasibility of a De-
partment of Peace"?

Mr. FULBRIGHT. A Department of
Peace?

Mr. HARTKE. Yes.

Mr. FULBRIGHT. No. I think that if
Senator is going to put in anything—
and I do not think it is necessary—I men-
tioned section (5) a moment ago: "Other
measures to promote economy, efficiency,
and improved administration." Chang-
ing that to "Or other measures to pro-
mote peace" would be offensive and
would emphasize what is obviously in-
tended by this provision.

Mr. HARTKE. In other words, the
Senator says that "other measures to
promote peace—

Mr. FULBRIGHT. The Senator can
put in the word "peace" if he wishes.

Mr. HARTKE. "Other measures to
promote peace, economy, efficiency, and
improve the administration of foreign
policy?"

Mr. FULBRIGHT. Yes.

Mr. HARTKE. That would be accept-
able under the circumstances.

Mr. FULBRIGHT. I think it would
be. That is perfectly proper. That is
clearly implied, I think, in the purposes
of this Commission.

Mr. HARTKE. Mr. President, I suggest
the absence of a quorum.

The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk
will call the roll.

The second assistant legislative clerk
proceeded to call the roll.

Mr. HARTKE. Mr. President, I ask
unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.

The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without
objection, it is so ordered.

Mr. HARTKE. Mr. President, I am
prepared at this time to make a modi-

fication of my amendment. My under-
standing of the parliamentary situation
is that a modification of the amendment
would require unanimous consent, and
I am prepared to withdraw my amend-
ment and make a substitution; but I
am not prepared to do so in the event
there is going to be an objection to the
unanimous-consent request.

The PRESIDING OFFICER. Unani-
mous consent is required for the Senator
to either modify or withdraw the amend-
ment.

Mr. HARTKE. Mr. President. I ask
unanimous consent that I be permitted
to withdraw my amendment and offer
a new amendment, which, in effect,
would add, on page 35 of the bill, in
section 603(a) (5), the word "peace" af-
ter the word "promote" and before the
word "economy."

The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there
objection?

Mr. ROBERT C. BYRD. Mr. President,
reserving the right to object—and I do
not intend to object—would this entail
any conflict with the previous unani-
mous-consent agreement with respect to
the laying aside of the Church-Case and
the Griffin amendments?

The PRESIDING OFFICER. This is a
different amendment.

Mr. ROBERT C. BYRD. Mr. President,
I would reserve my objection and ask
that the Senator modify his request to
include the proposition that the previous
unanimous-consent order in no way be
affected.

Mr. HARTKE. I so modify my re-
quest—that is, that it shall in no way
affect the previous time order or any
other proceedings, under any other
amendments or proceedings which have
been had heretofore.

Mr. ROBERT C. BYRD. And that the
new amendment would have to be dis-
posed of within that overall 1-hour time
period provided in the previous agree-
ment.

Mr. HARTKE. I agree to that.

The PRESIDING OFFICER. That is
the same as modifying the amendment.

Is there objection? The Chair hears
none, and it is so ordered.

Mr. HARTKE. Mr. President, my time
has expired. I have no time remaining.

The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Sen-
ator is correct. His time has expired.

Mr. FULBRIGHT. Mr. President, I
yield myself such time as I may require.

I should like to explain for the record
my understanding of what is now the
amendment before the Senate. The Sen-
ator's original amendment has been
withdrawn; and in place of that, on page
35, line 19, after the word "promote," he
would insert the word "peace."

I see no objection to this. I believe
that a full understanding of the purpose
of the language in the bill would include
peace. It certainly would be contem-
plated that this Commission, in studying
the processes and programs of our Gov-
ernment would be looking toward the
promotion of peace. So I would be per-
fectly willing to accept this amendment.
I think it delineates more specifically
what is contemplated and I see no ob-
jection to it.

Mr. President, I yield back the re-
mainder of my time.

The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr.
TOM). All time on the amendment
been yielded back. The question
agreeing to the amendment of the
ator from Indiana. (Putting the
tion.)

The amendment was agreed to.

Mr. ROBERT C. BYRD. Mr. I
dent, what is the pending question
fore the Senate?

The PRESIDING OFFICER. The
tion recurs on the amendment of
Senator from Michigan (Mr. GRIFFI-

QUORUM CALL

Mr. HARTKE. Mr. President, I su-
the absence of a quorum.

The PRESIDING OFFICER. The
will call the roll.

The legislative clerk proceeded to
the roll.

Mr. ROBERT C. BYRD. Mr. I
dent, I ask unanimous consent that
order for the quorum call be rescinded.

The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr.
TOM). Without objection, it is so or-

ORDER OF BUSINESS

Mr. ROBERT C. BYRD. Mr. I
dent, again, for the record, what
pending question before the Senat-
er.

The PRESIDING OFFICER. It
the amendment of the Senator
Michigan (Mr. GRIFFIN) to S. 3526.

Mr. ROBERT C. BYRD. I than
Presiding Officer.

Mr. President, the leadership has
deavored to inquire as to whether
are other amendments to S. 352
which a time limitation might be re-
which would permit prompt acti-
such amendments without a long s
aside of the pending amendment by
GRIFFIN.

The leadership is unable, howev-
find any additional amendments
Members would be willing to take up
afternoon or tomorrow with only a
sonably short period of time for
discussion and disposition of
amendments.

Furthermore, there are no other
ures on the calendar which are c
for action today or tomorrow. As
conference report on the higher e
tion bill, it will not be brought up
next week.

The situation being what it is,
Mr. President, the only thing the
Senate could do on tomorrow would
to come in and spin its wheels if, in
the wheels would turn at all. A few
ators might be on hand or they
not be on hand to make speeches. I
no way of knowing whether Sen-
would be disposed to discuss the
business on tomorrow. I doubt it.

That being the case, before char-
the date for the next convening of
the Senate, I want to express my ap-
tion to the Senator from Indiana
HARTKE) and the Senator from Ark
(Mr. FULBRIGHT) for their willing-
dispose of the amendment which
just disposed of a bit earlier, and I
to express the hope—shared by the
tinguished majority leader, I am so

NOVEMBER 17, 1971 ATTENDANCE
TO DATE - 11/15/71

MEMBER

* Dr. William A. Altemeier

** William E. Anderson

Paul M. Arnall

* Dr. Taylor Asbury

William D. Atteberry

* Norman P. Auburn

** Dr. Charles M. Barrett

Oliver W. Birckhead

** Sanford M. Brooks

John R. Bullock

* Ralph R. Burchenal

James R. Carruthers

** W. Rowell Chase

** Paul W. Christensen, Sr.

** Paul W. Chritsensen, Jr.

* John J. Glippinger

* V. Anderson Coombe

** W. Howard Cox

Francis L. Dale

** Jacob E. Davis

* Laurence L. Davis

* Richard R. Deupree, Jr.

* William O. DeWitt

M. Reynolds Dodson

* Charles W. Doepke

** Roger Drackett

* William T. Earls

Morris Edwards

* H. Truxton Emerson, Jr.

** James M. Ewell

** David M. Forker

* Oliver M. Gale

* John W. Gantt

James M. Garvey

* Henry Lymann Greer

* Ernst Hackney

Joseph B. Hall

** Frank T. Hamilton

Edward G. Harness

John W. Hanley

GUEST

William H. Anderson

Dr. Eslie Asbury and James H. Stone

Lloyd I. Miller

Harry Hopkins

John M. Bullock and J. Mach Swigert

Jack Landen and J. Thompson

Don Driscoll

John T. Lawrence and Paul D. Myers

Robert Stachler

Murray S. Monroe

Frederic C. Hirons

William O. DeWitt, Jr and Warren C. Giles

Don C. Alexander

John F. Steele and Joseph P. Hayden, Jr.

Charles S. Millard and Arnold A. Johnson

Paul R. Ilyinsky

Warner A. Peck, Jr and Donn D. Early

* Commonwealth Club Member exclusively

** Members of both Clubs

NOVEMBER 17, 1971 ATTENDANCE

TO DATE 11/15/71

Page Two

MEMBER

E. Webster Harrison

C. Bart Hawley

Reuben B. Hays

Joseph H. Head, Jr.

James P. Herring

Henry W. Hobson, Jr.

John Baker Hollister

Wickliffe Jones

Dr. Harvey C. Knowles, Jr.

Polk Laffoon

Fred Lazarus, Jr

Fred Lazarus III

Daniel W. LeBlond

John S. Lillard

John M. Lockhart

Perrin G. March III

Graham E. Marx

Charles S. Mechem, Jr.

James M.E. Mixter

Harold W. Nichols, Jr.

Louis Nippert

Fltecher E. Nyce

William L. Oberhelman

James Potter Orr

Kroger Pettengill

David Pollak

C. Lawson Reed Charles M. Robertson, Jr.

Richard B. Robinson

Lawrence H. Rogers, II

John Jay Rowe, Jr.

Stanley M. Rowe, Sr.

William S. Rowe

Eugene P. Ruehlmann

Charles Sawyer

Nelson Schwab, Jr.

Frank H. Shaffer, Jr.

T. Spencer Shore

John G. Smale

Leonard S. Smith, III

J. Paul Sticht

John L. Strubbe

Stuart B. Sutphin, Jr.

Charles P. Taft

GUEST

Trimble Smith and William Liggett

Asa I. Atkins

Jerome Rich and Charles G. Puchta and James

J. Espy

Don C. McGraw

Lawrence H. Kyte, Jr.

John S. Andrews

John P. March

Dudley S. Taft

Robert J. Barth and Clifford h. Coors

Doctor John Wulsin

Louis F. Polk and Leslie Gaut

Snowden Rowe

Philip G. Barach

Groverman Blake and Frank H. Saffer, III

William Armstrong, Jr and T. Spencer Shore Jr.

Powell McHenry and Herbert Landsmann

Robert O. Aders

John V. Earls

William E. Miller and Leonard M. Sive

** Members of both Clubs