Gobierno de Canarias
Consejería de Economía y Hacienda

NOV 13 1995

Santa Cruz de Tenerife, October 26th, 1995

Mr. Henry Kissinger
Twenty-Sixth Floor
350 Park Avenue
New York, N.Y. 10022
U.S.A.

Dear Mr. Kissinger,

Following to our personal conversation held last October 5, on the occasion of the World Development Congress, I herewith confirm, on behalf of the Government, our invitation to visit the Canary Islands.

May I remind you that we are very interested in having your enterprise consulting services, though your visit would be a great occasion to move forward into our aims.

Our weather, pleasant even in winter, might be attractive for you and the group that usually travels with you. Needless to say that they would be our guests as well.

We look forward to hearing from you. Cordially yours.

Fdo.: José Carlos Francisco Díaz
Consejero de Economía y Hacienda
(Regional Minister Finance & Treasury)

Peter Frankel
"Elmstead", Chapel Road,
Limpsfield Common,
Surrey RH8 0SX, U.K.

Tel: 01883 730524

Fax: 01883 717116

6 June 1995

PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL

Dr Henry Kissinger
Kissinger Associates Inc
350 Park Avenue
26th Floor
New York 10022
USA

Dear Dr Kissinger

On 12th April, I took the opportunity of writing to you based on a report which appeared in the Financial Times in which it was alleged that in a speech you made at the "Britain in the World" Conference of 29th March, you had said "the UK could play an important role in forging a strong transatlantic relationship, though as a representative of Europe, not as an individual nation."

Because the immense respect I have for you, I wrote to you expressing my deep concern about such a statement. Your executive assistant, Suzanne McFarlane, on 1st May, indicated that you had not used those words. I then took the matter up with the paper that reported your speech and they had the courtesy of sending me the actual speech. I read it with great interest and it was, as usual, a speech in great depth. It is interesting that in your final paragraph you are in fact re-defining the relationship with Britain and you say exactly those words. "Now, the challenge is whether this can be done on European/American relations and this is where Britain's experience can make a seminal contribution."

While the wording is different and you did not actually say the words the press attributed to you the meaning is exactly the same, and I, in a way, deeply regret that when your executive assistant did quite correctly say that you never used the words which were reported, she did not indicate that towards the end of the speech you did indicate what really amounted to the same thing.

My interpretation of your words is that there should be European/American relations and that Britain's advice could be helpful. It disturbs me deeply that when there are so many divisions in the so-called European Union and the Maastricht Agreement being an appalling document of destruction of national identity, that a man of your immense stature should have agreed that the relationship between the United States and Britain is to be replaced by a relationship between the United States and Europe, by which, I imagine, the assumed European Union.

.../2

Int. Fax: 44-1883-717116 Int. Tel: 44-1883-730524

-2-

I must tell you that it is my firm belief that the Union as planned will eventually provide
nothing but dispute, that the dictatorship of the Brussels bureaucracy over the members of
the Union will be discord and destructive, and that Britain, hopefully, when it comes to
the final decisions, will neither join a single currency nor accept further reduction of its
already denied sovereignty.

I felt obliged to write you this letter because I cannot possibly image that a man with your
enormous experience respected world-wide should have accepted, without questions, the
Maastricht Treaty and the Union, although you do not say so in so many words, by
indicating that Britain can be an advisor to the European Union on how to relate to the
United States.

I do not wish to take more of your time and to go into the very deep issues which are
divisive as the common currency and the obviously false information that is given by
governments to their people.

One example, however, I would like to give, because you may not be aware of it; the
Maastricht Treaty when proposing a single currency obliges each nation to deposit their
foreign reserves in a Central bank in Frankfurt. A single currency will enable such a bank
to make any regulation it wishes which must be acceptable to the member nations, as once
you are in the same currency you are irrevocably linked to it.

Please give some thought to what really would happen if there was a single currency, to
the sovereignty of the nations, to their inability to determine their own economic policies,
the enormous funds held by the central bank in Frankfurt and the reduction of the power
of decision-making of national parliaments. The extraordinary statements made by certain
politicians that you could have a single currency without a political union is manifest
nonsense, and that is equally deeply disturbing.

I imagine I will be meeting you somewhere at an international congress or conference and
then certainly we may have the opportunity, if you so wish, to discuss the matter further.

In the meantime, I send you my very warmest regards.

Yours sincerely

Peter Frankel

Peter Frankel
"Elmstead", Chapel Road,
Limpsfield Common,
Surrey RH8 OSX, U.K.
Tel: 01883 730524
Fax: 01883 717116

APR 17 1995

12 April 1995

Dear Dr Kissinger

You may not recall, but we met briefly twice at the World Economic Forum and I thought I would write to you because having been an admirer of yours for several years, I was surprised and dismayed at a statement that you recently made. It is only by getting some feedback that you might reconsider what you have said and therefore I hope you will accept the reasons for this letter.

First of all, let me explain that you and I come from a very similar background. I was born in Berlin, left when I was eleven for Austria, and escaped from the Nazis on the 13th March 1938 when Hitler entered Austria. I was born in 1921. I am therefore a European by birth; I speak fluent French, Portuguese, Spanish and German, and I believe that I have learned to understand the different mentalities of the different people in Europe. I am also not one of those who hopefully thinks that much has changed in the last fifty years. I believe that underlying traits of character are still there, but fortunately we have been able to hone down some of the major differences which have led to conflicts over so many centuries.

On the 30th March at a conference in London, you made allegedly the following comment. "The UK could play an important role in forging a stronger transatlantic relationship, though as a representative of Europe, not as an individual nation." Surely you are not convinced yourself that this could possibly ever happen. This whole contrived European Union when one tries to put into one pot the traditions of sixteen nations can only lead to the dreadful conflicts that we now see happening among nations or people that have been kept together by force or by circumstance not of their own making.

A common market is a sound idea. Trade interests which lead to free exchange of goods between a large territory composed of many nations is a constructive step. But a union as imagined in the Maastricht Agreement would be a total and absolute disaster.

Victor Hugo, in 1948, made it quite clear that what one had to have is nation states, who work closely together and who would be represented in a senate to discuss their problems and difficulties and find the adequate solutions.

Int. Fax: 44-1883-717116 Int.Tel: 44-1883-730524

-2-

In Europe, a lot of things have gone wrong. We should not even have a separately elected parliament, but a senate or a house where parliamentarians, elected in their own countries, represent those countries and their respective parties. They even consider that the now sixteen nations could become one is not understanding the mentality, the background, the tradition, and the language differences of the European people. I am sure you remember what happened sixty years ago. All this is not over yet, but we must find peaceful solutions for all the problems in Europe. The least peaceful solution would be to put all these nations into one because the result is an eruption.

I would therefore say that the special relationship between Great Britain and the United States must remain as it has been for so long and is as it should continue for ever, but Britain cannot represent the so-called European Union. The differences of background and traditions are too large. There is an affinity between the United States and the United Kingdom, an affinity which does not exist between, lets say France and the United states. The withdrawal of France from NATO was not that long ago. Or do you believe that there is such a close relationship between the other nations and the United States? Sometimes they are the wrong relations, like with the Irish, but the real test is background, and this is where the British and the Americans will always be one when it comes to the big issues in this world.

I do not want to go into more details. I think you would not have the time to consider them, but I would like to continue to respect your judgement, your views and the brilliance of your mind and sincerely hope that you did not mean exactly, as it was reported in the Financial Times, when the conference took place in London.

I send you my very warmest personal regards and remain,

Yours sincerely

Peter Frankel

HENRY E. FREEMAN
PRESIDENT

FREEMAN INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES
C O R P O R A T I O N

415 SAW MILL ROAD • STAMFORD, CONNECTICUT 06903

TELEPHONE 203 968-2400
FAX 203 968-XXX 1828

JAN 31 1995

January 27, 1995

Mr. Henry Kissinger
350 Park Avenue
26th Floor
New York, NY 10022

Dear Henry,

We recently had our 4th annual dinner party for General and Mrs. Haig at our Palm Beach home. Al told me that your wife was in the Hospital with a stomach ailment, and I would like to extend my best wishes for her speedy recovery!

You certainly had enough traumatic experiences lately and I want to wish you much brighter times ahead. How is your mother now after her remarkable recovery?

I am looking forward to hearing from you, and with warm regards, I am.

PROGRESS

HENRY E. FREEMAN
PRESIDENT

OCT 05 1995

415 SAW MILL ROAD • STAMFORD, CONNECTICUT 06903-3508

TELEPHONE 203 968-2400

FAX 203 968-1828

October 3, 1995

Dear Henry,

We recently introduced the vastly improved UnTangler with a much longer life span, and I wanted you to be one of the first to receive my enhanced creation.

I trust that Nancy has fully recuperated from her operation, and that both she and your mother are doing well. My wife, Marjatta, whom you met some years ago after you made a speech at the Temple here in Stamford, recently had a hysterectomy operation. I am glad to say that the surgery was very successful, and she is doing well.

By sheer coincidence, my wife occupied the same room that I had on the 9th Floor at Columbia Presbyterian almost a year ago. When I was visiting my wife every day, I was wondering how your mother was, as she was only a few yards away last year when I had my kidney operation. As I mentioned above, I hope she is doing well, and please convey my regards and best wishes to her.

Do you plan to be in Florida during the holidays? If so, we would like to give a dinner in your honor, possibly together with our mutual friend, Al Haig.

With warmest regards,

Mr. Henry A. Kissinger
Twenty-sixth Floor
350 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10022

Walter Darnall Vinyard
President

THE FRENCH-AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
OF WASHINGTON, D.C.

September 12, 1995

VIA FAX and U.S. Mail

The Honorable Henry A. Kissinger
Kissinger Associates
350 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10022-6022

Dear Mr. Secretary:

It is my pleasure and honor, Mr. Secretary, to inform you that our Board of Directors has unanimously voted to invite you to receive the Emmanuel de Margerie Award which will be presented to you at a formal dinner in Washington during the Spring of 1996.

The Award recognizes your outstanding contributions to international peace and goodwill and, in particular, development of positive relations between the United States and France.

The Board has also voted to bestow the Thomas Jefferson Award on the same evening to President Válery Giscard-d'Estaing. He has graciously accepted our invitation.

If you also accept, we would coordinate your schedule with that of President Gcard-d'Estaing. The dinner should be held in March, April or May. We look forward to working out suitable arrangements with your staff.

It would be helpful if we could receive a response by September 22. I look forward to having you with us.

WDV/ela

1730 Rhode Island Ave., N.W., Suite 711, Washington, DC 20036 • Tel: 202-637-6838 • Fax: 202-637-5910

HENRY A. KISSINGER

May 16, 1995

Dear Ms. Friedman:

I note that Marvin Josephson has already answered the two questions you raised in your letter to me of May 9. I just wanted to explain that I won't be able to decide whether to include reflections about Nixon until I have essentially written the book. This is partly because I don't want reviews of the book to focus primarily on Nixon. But as the work progresses, I will keep you informed.

Ms. Fredrica S. Friedman
Vice President
Executive Editor and
Associate Publisher
Little, Brown and Co.
1271 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10020

TWENTY-SIXTH FLOOR • 350 PARK AVENUE • NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022 • (212) 759-7919

ICM HOLDINGS INC.

MARVIN JOSEPHSON
CHAIRMAN

MAY 16 1995

May 12, 1995

Ms. Fredrica S. Friedman
Vice President
Executive Editor and
Associate Publisher
Little, Brown and Company
1271 Avenue of the Americas
New York, N.Y. 10020

Dear Fredi:

Dr. Kissinger has asked me to reply to your letter of
May 9 regarding volume III of his memoirs.

As you know, our contract calls for volume III to cover
his government services in the Ford Administration. It
does not call for "detailed new reflections on President
Nixon". Henry may very well include such reflections in
volume III, but he is not in a position at this time to
advise you that he will definitely include such reflections
in volume III. In part, it will depend on how the account
of the Ford years goes.

With respect to an estimated delivery date, Nancy's health
problems have thrown Henry off his original schedule. He
expects to have an estimated delivery date for you by the
end of the summer.

Warm personal regards.

MJ/amg

cc: Dr. Henry Kissinger✓

40 WEST 57th STREET, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10019 (212) 556-5610 FAX (212) 556-6886 TELEX 125422
PARENT COMPANY OF INTERNATIONAL CREATIVE MANAGEMENT, INC. (TALENT AND LITERARY AGENCY) AND ICM ARTISTS LTD.

MAY 1 1995

LITTLE, BROWN AND COMPANY
PUBLISHERS

1837

FREDRICA S. FRIEDMAN

VICE PRESIDENT
EXECUTIVE EDITOR AND
ASSOCIATE PUBLISHER

May 9, 1995

Dr. Henry Kissinger
Kissinger Associates
350 Park Avenue
26th Floor
New York, NY 10022

Dear Dr. Kissinger:

I would like to confirm our understanding of two important points with regard to Little, Brown's publication of the next volume of your Memoirs.

In terms of the content of that book, we anticipate Volume III to cover your final years of government service in the Ford Administration, and your detailed new reflections on President Nixon.

Last summer you had said you would deliver Volume III in December, 1996; if that timetable is still correct, we would schedule publication of this volume for Fall, 1997.

I look forward to hearing from you on these two matters, and to working with you on this most exciting book.

FSF/jlm

cc: Marvin Josephson

1271 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS — NEW YORK, NY 10020 — (212) 522-8700 — FAX (212) 522-2067

12/13/95 WED 11:12 FAX 212 628 1664

COUNCIL FOR REL

002

Council on Foreign Relations

58 East 68th Street
New York, NY 10021
212-734-0400
Fax: 212-628-1664

FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET

**Date:** December 6, 1995
**To:** Henry Kissinger
**Fax:**
**Sender:** Les Gelb

Re: Council's Trip to Vietnam

Attached is my memo to the Council's Board about what you call "McNamara's trip to Vietnam."
The memo and the one attached from Karen Sughrue (from my staff who organized the trip), shows
this: the purpose was not to put Bob McNamara or anyone else forward to rewrite the history of
the Vietnam War; rather, the purpose was to get Vietnamese agreement to hold a conference
looking back at major possible turning points of the war.

That mission was accomplished, but serious hurdles remain before we can actually hold such a
conference. First, we have to make sure that the Vietnamese will bring adequate historical
documents. We have historians working with us who know this business. Second, we have to put
together a truly representative "American side" for the conference. Third, we have to get Hanoi's
agreement for South Vietnamese participation as well. The trip McNamara went on was the first
step toward holding this conference.

Alas, you weren't the only one to question my choice of Bob to go along with the Council-Brown
delegation. But I've been able to satisfy others that my intent was and remains to help fill an
important historical void. My guess, as you might well have predicted from my own book on
Vietnam, is that Hanoi will tell us that they never would have stopped the war short of a virtual
American surrender. The Vietnamese may even question their own goals in this regard, as some of
our delegation members reported from their trip.

Most of all, I hope you yourself will participate if this conference ever comes to pass.

Happy Holidays.

P.S. Also attached is my report to the Council's Board on my recent trip to Cuba and Castro.

COUNCIL FOR REL

003

December 1, 1995

TO: Council on Foreign Relations Board of Directors
FR: Les Gelb
RE: Proposed Vietnam War Conference

Attached is a memo from Karen Sughrue, Vice President for Programs & Media Projects, concerning her recent trip to Vietnam with a delegation the Council co-sponsored with Brown University that included Robert McNamara and six others. The purpose of the trip was to begin discussions with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Vietnam concerning a conference to review crucial points in the Vietnam War with an eye towards helping to strengthen the historical record and, if possible, learn lessons for the future. The conference would be held approximately a year from now.

As Karen's memo states, the trip was successful in obtaining our major objective -- Vietnam's endorsement for this important scholarly enterprise. The presence of McNamara on this preliminary trip brought the project to the attention of the highest levels of the government and broke the bureaucratic logjam.

The conference will be sponsored by the Council and Brown University and underwritten -- as this preliminary trip was -- by funds raised from foundations and individuals. Its organization will be largely in the hands of two very capable scholars with past experience doing this - Dr. James Blight and Dr. Janet Lang of the Watson Institute at Brown. They organized a series of conferences on the Cuban Missile Crisis and are in the midst of one now on the Carter-Brezhnev years.

As part of the process leading up to the Vietnam conference, we intend to organize an advisory group headed by an established historian to insure that the conference represents diverse points of view and is professional in process and result. The advisory group would consist of historians, journalists, former military officers and diplomats with knowledge of the Vietnam period. We will insure that the U.S. side of the conference includes officials and scholars who represent all points of view, people such as Gen. William Westmoreland, Walt Rostow, Mac Bundy, Mel Laird, etc. We will also insure that the Vietnamese will bring key historical documents as well as their memories.

We hope this project will have a great impact, not just on relations between the U.S. and Vietnam, but on all nations as they think about military involvement in other societies. Should you have any questions about the project, please feel free to contact me or Karen Sughrue directly.

12/13/95 WED 11:13 FAX 212 628 1664

COUNCIL FOR REL

☑ 004

November 30, 1995

TO: Les Gelb

FR: Karen M. Sughrue

RE: Proposed Conference on the Vietnam War

Here is a report on the recent trip to Vietnam sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations and Brown University. The delegation, which included former Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara, was warmly and enthusiastically -- received in Hanoi on many levels.

First, on an official level... it became evident on our first day there that the Vietnamese had circulated the concept paper to the highest levels of government, that top officials were ready to endorse the project, that the relevant "institutes" (International Relations, Strategic Studies and Military History) had been given the go-ahead to make this conference happen. That removed what we thought would be our first and biggest task, persuading the Vietnamese side of our bona fides and of the importance of the project. They were not just interested, they were already on board. The evidence was the level of meetings that had been arranged... the Vice President Madame Nguyen Thi Binh, Deputy Prime Minister (soon to be PM it's believed) Pham Van Khai, General Vo Nguyen Giap and Foreign Minister Nguyen Manh Cam.

On a personal level, we encountered virtually no hostility or polemical rhetoric. We were treated with great respect by all our Vietnamese audiences. They thanked us for proposing this project and expressed the hope that it would produce lessons for both countries and the world in preventing future conflicts.

On a professional level, the Vietnamese came prepared to begin work on the conference. We brought a proposal for the agenda items that contained very specific ideas on themes and specific incidents in the war that our side was interested in putting on the table. They were greatly interested in all of them and by our final meeting, they laid their response on the table.

12/13/95 WED 11:15 FAX 212 628 1664

COUNCIL FOR REL

005

The two agendas were largely parallel. Some differences -- they want to begin the historical inquiry with 1945, the year from which they date American involvement. I think we convinced them that few policymakers of that era were alive to participate in "oral history" and that we would accommodate that period through an exchange of scholarly papers. Their proposal was largely focused on a re-examination of American policy. We made the point that the conference must focus on both Vietnamese and American decisions to continue the war and reject negotiated solutions. They agreed to this.

As for the composition of the two delegations, both sides agreed that the delegations should be of the highest rank. The Vietnamese mentioned as possibilities from their side such personalities as Madame Binh, General Giap and others. From our side, we talked about the likes of Mac Bundy and General Westmoreland who have expressed interest depending on availability. We told the Vietnamese that we expect their delegation to reflect the differing opinions that we now know existed during the war years within their government. We assured them that the American delegation will reflect the same. Their response was that it is time for the Vietnamese to "be more objective" about their policy decisions during the war. We also broached the subject in smaller meetings of the participation of South Vietnamese and they did not find the names we put forward to be objectionable.

One issue seemed very important to the Vietnamese. They are opposed to having the conference be open to public view. This also happens to be what we want. Jim Blight and Janet Lang say this is essential to encouraging the participants to be frank and open in their recollections and to allow disagreements to surface. Still to be decided is whether the final product of the conference, whether written or video/audio, will be released and in what form.

Where do we go from here? Jim Blight and Janet Lang at Brown University will begin work in two areas:

-- Fundraising: McNamara will make a presentation to potential funders at Brown in early December. Jim will also begin contacts with major foundations. The cost of the conference could be as much as $500,000.

-- Agenda: Each side will put in writing its proposals for the agenda items and we will begin working out a consensus. Once the agenda is agreed upon, work on obtaining documents from both sides begins. On the issue of producing crucial documents to back up the faulty memories of these former policymakers, the Vietnamese were cautious about their ability to produce as much paper as the American side. However, those who can open up the critical archives were present in all our meetings and support the conference project.

HENRY A. KISSINGER

July 11, 1995

Dear Mrs. Fukuda:

I was travelling abroad when word reached me that Prime Minister Fukuda had passed away. I received the news with great sadness, for I had the highest regard for him, both as a distinguished statesman and as a valued friend. Throughout his life he served his country with dedication and wisdom, and his contributions to US-Japan friendship and cooperation will not soon be forgotten.

I join all who knew your husband in sending my deepest condolences to you and your family and hope that you will find solace in the many accomplishments for which he will be long remembered.

Mrs. Mie Fukuda
Shiba Zojoji
4-7-35 Shibakoen
Minato-ku
Tokyo, Japan

HENRY A. KISSINGER

September 28, 1995

Dear Dr. Funk:

In your issue of August 31, you described how I "tricked"
the actor Ron Silver into giving me a script of a movie
dealing with me by promising him secret documents.

The facts are far less dramatic. Ron Silver, whom I barely
know, took the initiative to invite me to lunch to discuss
the movie. He asked me for guidance since he was not
familiar with the events in question, and offered me the
script. Much of the material was false; some of it
defamatory. I pointed out only factual inaccuracies for
which unclassified documentary proof was available. I did
not comment on questions of judgment or interpretation. The
issue of secret documents did not arise, nor could it have,
since all the documents referring to the period I was in
office are in the Library of Congress in a facility
controlled by the government, over which I obviously cannot
dispose. Finally, I never threatened to stop the movie;
my sole request was to correct errors of fact.

Dr. Werner Funk
Editor-in-Chief
Stern Magazine
Am Baumwall 11
Postfach 110011
D-20444 Hamburg
Germany

Eher unterirdisch sind
nach wie vor die Tricks
des alten Fuchses **HENRY
KISSINGER**. Als Schau-
spieler **RON SILVER**,
Darsteller des ehemali-
gen US-Außenministers
in einem umstrittenen

Diplomatische Ver-
wicklungen: Kissinger-
Darsteller Ron Silver
hat Ärger mit
seinem Vorbild

FOTO: BERTRAND CARRIERE/TURNER PICTURES

biographischen Film, den Alten
trotz diverser Warnungen um Rat
fragte, wie er seine Rolle angehen
solle, versprach Kissinger ihm Zu-
gang zu geheimen Dokumenten, die
ganz neue Einblicke in seinen Cha-
rakter liefern könnten. Vorher müs-
se er natürlich das Drehbuch sehen,
um zu entscheiden, welche Doku-
mente geeignet seien. Entzückt
überließ ihm Silver das Skript und
erhielt kurz darauf einen 42sei-
tigen Brief, in dem Kissinger drohte,
das Filmprojekt zu stoppen. **TED
TURNER**, CNN-Boß und Produzent
des Werkes, war knapp
davor, Silver zu feu-
ern, ließ es dann
aber doch sein. Ei-
nen derartig hüb-
schen Einblick in die
Person Kissinger be-
kommt man schließ-
lich so schnell nicht
wieder.

To the Editor:

The facts are far less dramatic. Ron Silver, whom I
barely know, took the initiative to invite me to lunch to
discuss the movie. He asked me for guidance since he was
not familiar with the events in question, and offered me the
script. Much of the material was false; some of it
defamatory. I pointed out only factual inaccuracies for
which unclassified documentary proof was available. I did
not comment on questions of judgment or interpretation. The
issue of secret documents did not arise, nor would it have,

Fuschlberger

+49 7221 72695

SEITE: 2

(Short-) CURRICULUM VITAE

12-07-1994

F. ALBERT FUSCHLBERGER

born October 23rd. 1947 at Baden Reichenhall / Bavaria GERMANY

Married since 1972 with Teacher, one Child/Son - 14 Years

Residence: D-76534 BADEN BADEN, Heschmattweg 7, GERMANY (Family)

at the moment: c/o Club ALDIANA Sénègal, West Africa
P.O.Box 2985 SN-Dakar, Sénègal/Afrika
Fax.: ( 00221 ) 57.15.66
TLF.: ( 00221 ) 571549 or 571595

Languages: German, English, Spanish and French

Experience in Foreign Countries abroad:
England, Spain, France, Switzerland, Turkey, Senegal, Venezuela and Mexico (& Germany)
( Ea.bew. one and six years)

School Level of education: FHS-Reife/Abitur, HighSchoolDegree

Profession: Graduated of BA Business Administration (BERLIN 1974)
also: Hotel Manager License (Hotel Mgmt.School)
German: Betriebswirt

Professional Experience:

Since September 1992: General Manager of Club ALDIANA Senegal
300 Employees, 14 Mio.DM revenues p.a., 600 beds
and Managing Director of the owning company SSRT.
(100% doughter of NUR-Touristic GmbH Germany)

BEFORE THAT:

General Manager for STEIGENBERGER HOTELS AG in Turkey and in Baden Baden, Germany ( three years)

General Manager for HOLIDAY INNS INTL DIV. in Caracas, Venezuela, Trier and Munich - Germany ( eight -8- years)

Asst.Gen.Manager for INTER CONTINENTAL HOTEL CORP. in Valencia, Venezuela

Asst.Gen.Manager for ITT SHERATON HOTELS in Venezuela.

Regional Food & Beverage Manager for Hoteles El Presidente National Hotelera de México S.A. in Mexico.

Banqueting Manager/Opening of the 'El Presidente Chapultepec' Autum 1977 in Mexico City

BEFORE THE ABOVE:

Stagieres/Trainings in Royal Leamington Spa, England. With Fassbind Hotels in Lausanne, Switzerland; at the Restaurant Au Vieux Berlin in Paris, France - at the Hotel Valle Mar on the Canary Islands Teneriffe, Spain etc pp..

Dakar, Senegal/Africa

December 7th.1994

FEB-05-1995 06:53

+49 7221 72695

88%

P.02

Fuschberger

+49 7221 72695

SEITE: 3

Club Aldiana
Senegal

BUREAU DE LA DIRECTION GENERALE (Private!)

CONFIDENTIAL!

BY FAX / TWO (2) Pages

To
Mr.H.A.Kissinger Personal & Private
USA

Dec.7th.,1994

RE: Application with "MGM"

Dear Mr. Kissinger:

I learned lately, that you're the major advisor for the
Board of ' M.G.M. '

I intend to move to the US in 1995 - I therefore kindly
ask you, if my experience in nine (9) different countries
with some of the finest Hotel Companies could be interesting
for 'MGM' ? ( Hotel, Resort and CASINO Division)

I would very much like to join MGM by next year in the US -
or, if they intend to move to Europe, I would agree to
work for MGM even in Europe - building-up their Hotel Division
there.

The US-Visa ('Green Card') would not be a big problem -
I could start with a so called 18-month visa and than
change; as I would qualify for an investment visa ( own
capital = over One Mio US $ ...)

Please Mr. Kissinger, read my short curriculum and help me
to get an appointment for a personal interview with someone
from the MGM Board. Of course I am able to come any time to
the US (on my own expenses) to meet MGM.

My curriculum can be extended and back-up documents can be
mailed (& Photo etc) if there is interest (recommendation
letters,certificates,diplomas etc)

A positive reply from either you, or the MGM Board, would be
very much appreciated; it's my X-Mas and Year-End Wish to
settle completely NEW, my Life in 1995!

ENCLOSURE: 1 Page ( CV )

CLUB ALDIANA A NIANING • MBOUR (221) 67.18.98/67.18.49 • FAX 67.18.88 • TELEX: 77 108 ALDIANA 60 TELEGRAMME: ALDIANA DAKAR • NINCAY N° 0032178
SOCIETES GENERALAISE DE REALISATIONS TOURISTIQUES • BIEGE SOCIAL • ROUTE DE JOAL-NIANING • R.O. THIEB N° 277/8/93
GERANCE: F. ALBERT FUSCHLBERGER • PRESIDENT DU CONSEIL D'ADMINISTRATION • HERMANN KRATZ
B.A.R.L. AU CAPITAL DE 870.000.000 F. CFA • ADRESSE: B.P. 2986 DAKAR REPUBLIQUE DU SENEGAL • BANQUE: B.I.C.I.S. DAKAR N° 02017048

CESIIT
SOLIBUS

FEB-05-1995 06:53

+49 7221 72695

89%

P.03

Fuschlberger

+49 7221 72695

SEITE: 1

D - 76534 Baden Baden/Germany

TLF. & FAX: (07221) 72 695 (Private)

BY FAX: four (4) pages

February, 5th. 1995

Dear Mr. Kissinger:

Hope you're well.

December 7th. last year I've sent you the here enclosed Fax in order to obtain an interview with the Board of MGM. Unfortunately until today February the 5th.95 I've not yet heard either from MGM neither from you. Maybe the reply did not reach me??

I am since January 11th here in Germany, at my private house in Baden Baden.
(Adress see above)

Now tomorrow I am travelling on a PRIVATE trip to Las Vegas for one week!

I am staying at the GOLDEN NUGGET HOTEL from Monday Feb. 6th. 95 until Sunday, Feb. 12 th. 95 as a regular guest.

The TLF. Number of the Golden Nugget Hotel is: -702-385.71.11

The FAX Number of this Las Vegas Resort: -702-386.83.62

It would be nice, if you could arrange an interview with the responsible Director for the Hotel Division of MGM during my short stay in Las Vegas.

I would very much appreciate your kind cooperation with my request Mr. Kissinger.

Attached hereto, pls. find (again) the copies of my correspondence to you in this matter, dated december 7th. last year -- ONLY FOR INFO.

Hope to hear from you, or from MGM during my visit to Las Vegas next week.

ENCLOSURES: three pages

FEB-05-1995 06:52

+49 7221 72695

P.01