GENERAL

KISSINGER, HENRY A.,

March 24, 1969

Mrs. Joseph Schneider
1 Washington Avenue
Bldg. 12, Apt. 2A
Morristown, New Jersey 07960

Dear Mrs. Schneider:

Thank you very much for your letter. I'm truly sorry for replying at this late date, but my secretary mislaid your letter during the transition period and has just brought it to my attention. I hope you will accept my sincere apologies.

I know how concerned you must be about your son going to Vietnam. I can assure you that there are many of us who have the same concerns and who are constantly working toward the day when our young men will return home safely.

Thank you for sharing your thoughts with me.

(Type of request)

Jun 17

(Date received)

ms

(By)

Ellen

Mary/Keenan, in Senator Kennedy's office - on behalf of
Name: Rev. William Schneider, Episcopal Chaplain, Harvard-Radcliffe

Request: Wants to bring a group (the Episcopal Ministry to Higher Education, now meeting in Washington) to meet with Mr. Kissinger and discuss campus and general university problems around the country. Any time today or tomorrow.

She will find out the size of the group that wants to come, and approx. how much time they want, and will call us back if we have not called her.

225-2158
She called back to say about 15 people would accompany Rev. Schneider. They would like to meet with HAK for about 45 min. Thurs afternoon, 6/18.

DRY's Recommendation:

HAK's Answer:

Date and Time:

Party Contacted:

Additional Information: HAK and in Mexico will be met by Chon. Heard or Ehrlichman's staff.

Resolution:

RECEIVED

JUL 8 1970

CENTRAL FILES

Louis J. Schneuwly

Falkenweg 19

3000 Bern (Schweiz)

Bern, 11. Januar 1969

KISSINGER, HENRY A./S

Herrn
George Kissinger
Special Assistent to
President-elect R.M. Nixon
for Political Affairs
Washington

Sehr geehrter Herr Kissinger

Zwar etwas verspätet, aber nicht weniger herzlich, möchte
ich Ihnen zur Uebernahme dieses Amtes gratulieren, ob-
gleich ich nicht sicher bin ob ich besser täte Ihnen zu
kondolieren, angesichts der schweren Hypothek die Sie
mit diesem Posten übernehmen müssen.

* Wir wissen, dass es mit Vietnam nicht gut steht und
dass Amerika nur einen Frieden sucht um sich heraus-
zuwinden.

* 30'000 tote Amerikaner bleiben zurück, die fern von
ihrer Heimat tapfer gekämpft haben.

* Vietnam ist stark verwüstet.

* Amerika ging einem Betrag von über 100 Milliarden Dollar verlustig der für das Sozialprogramm hätte verwendet werden müssen.

Bereits 1964/65 hatte ich der Administration all die
psychologischen, rechtlichen und militärischen Gründe
klargelegt die gegen die vorgenommene Intervention
sprachen, obschon ich die Domino-Würfel-These inbezug
auf die andern Staaten voll anerkannte. Heute wissen wir
mit ziemlich grosser Sicherheit, dass der kommunistische
Staatsstreich in Indonesien ohne das Eingreifen Amerikas
in Vietnam geglückt wäre.

Ich gestatte mir, Ihnen folgende Fragen zu stellen, von
deren richtige Beantwortung Erfolg oder Misserfolg Ihrer
Mission abhängt, falls Sie daraus die harten Konsequenzen
ziehen.

* Glauben Sie, dass wir Vietnam halten können?

* Falls wir Vietnam verlieren, können wir dann Laos,
Kambodscha, Tailand, Malakka und Indonesien halten?

* Hätte es einen Sinn für diese Staaten zu kämpfen?

* Innerhalb welchem Zeitpunkt müssten wir mit ihrem
Verlust rechnen?

RECEIVED
FEB 21 1969

CENTRAL FILES

2

* Können wir uns den Verlust dieser Länder gestatten, ohne befürchten zu müssen, dass damit eine entscheidende Wendung zu unserem Nachteil vollzogen wird?

Ich glaube, dass die ganze Arbeit der alten Aministration nicht auf einer umfassenden Strategie beruhte, sondern auf brutaler Improvisation. Grundsätzlich bin ich nicht gegen ein Engagement in Vietnam, nur hätte dieses ohne direkte Kampfbeteiligung aber auf Grund einer hervorragenden Konzeption erfolgen müssen. Aber auch so sehe ich keinen sicheren Erfolg dort, sondern es wäre vielmehr so, dass wir uns sagen könnten, wir haben das Möglichste getan, ohne dabei grosse Verluste zu erleiden.

Meine Feststellung, dass wir unser System in Asien genau so mit Waffengewalt aufrechterhalten müssen wie die Sowjets das ihre in Europa, ist politisch entscheident. Genau so entscheident aber ist, dass auf weite Sicht gesehen Europa letztlich stärker ist als Asien.

Die alte Administration wollte ganz einfach den Status quo aufrechterhalten und das ist auf die Dauer gesehen nicht möglich. Ich glaube vielmehr, dass Heraklit recht behält, wenn er uns sagt, dass alles fliesst und nichts stillsteht. Ohne sich dieser Tatsache bewusst zu werden und daraus die Schlüsse zu ziehen stehen Sie in vier Jahren genau dort, wo heute auch Rostow steht. Vier Jahre sind für einen Mann in Ihrer Stellung eine sehr kurze Zeitspanne, glauben Sie mir das.

Noch bevor ich Plato kannte, kam auch ich zur Ueberzeugung, dass des Uebels kein Ende sein wird, bis die wahren Philosophen zur Herrschaft im Staate gelangen oder die Herrscher selbst durch göttliche Fügung Phisosophen werden. Zu einem wirklichen Frieden zu gelangen ist nämlich noch ein weiter Weg. Ich glaube aber, dass die Natur, zu einem Zeitpunkt da ihr durch totale Vernichtung Gefahr droht, für die nötigen Veränderungen auch die mögliche politische Konstellation schuf, um eines Tages doch aus den Wirren herauszukommen die es fortwährend gab so weit wir zurückblättern können.

Nicht nur habe ich umfassende politische Kenntnisse, sondern auch entsprechende Pläne über die ich schon Morgen mit Ihnen sprechen möchte. Falls Sie einmal nach Europa fliegen, dann lassen Sie sich doch in Bern sehen, es würde mich freuen. Am 20. Januar werden Sie Ihr Amt formell übernehmen. Ich entbiete Ihnen dazu meine besten Glückwünsche. An diesem Tag werde ich an Sie denken, es ist mein Geburtstag.

Freundliche Grüsse und alles Gute

L.J. SCHNEUWLY

Staatsphilosoph

The Ambassador of Switzerland

GENERAL

P.O. Box
00145

KISSINGER, HENRY T.

KISSINGER, HENRY A. /S/

[c]

Washington, D.C.

April 9, 1973

Dear Dr. Kissinger:

May I draw your attention to the forthcoming visit in Washington, D.C. of Ambassador Paul Jolles, an outstanding public servant of Switzerland. Dr. Jolles, a former Deputy Director of the Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, is in charge of our foreign trade relations, has directed the negotiations that have led to our recent agreement with the Common Market and is actually serving as President of the Executive Committee "new style" of the OECD.

During his stay here he will have an opportunity, first alone, then in the company of the Economic Minister of our country, to meet with major personalities here, interested in the actual international trade issues.

It is very evident, however, that the economic questions, far beyond their direct significance, are bound to have a profound impact on transatlantic relations and world politics as a whole. This is an aspect of our international life with which Dr. Jolles, in his official position in Berne, is much concerned, and I wonder therefore whether there would not exist a substantial mutual interest for you as well as for him to find an occasion to an exchange of views.

Dr. Jolles will be in Washington from the first to the fourth of May. He would again be available here in the afternoon of the ninth of May. Would it be convenient for you to receive him on any of these days? Perhaps I could also suggest a luncheon invitation for you and him in the Metropolitan Club, for instance on May 4?

With best regards;

The Honorable
Dr. Henry Kissinger
The White House
Washington, D.C. 20500

RECEIVED

APR 27 1973

KISSINGER, HENRY A. /S

September 29, 1971

Dear Taft:

Just a note today for you when you return to thank you for
your kindness over this past weekend. Your home, of course,
was very comfortable, and I hope all of the arrangements with
equipment and personnel did not cause too much difficulty.

I hope you will give my special thanks to Marie in your
office. She must have been unable to do anything else except take
care of me during those days. Also, my appreciation to Gladys
and Joseph for the assistance they gave me in the house.

After staying at your home in Beverly Hills, I can assure
you that the trip to Alaska presented certain domestic setbacks.
I hope your trip was as pleasant as mine, and I am looking
forward to hearing from you about it.

Mr. Taft Schreiber
1160 Tower Road
Beverly Hills, California 90200

CSH:mb

RECEIVED
OCT. 2 1971
CENTRAL RILES

KISSINGER, HENRY A.

100 UNIVERSAL CITY PLAZA
UNIVERSAL CITY, CALIFORNIA 91608

PHONE 985-4321

EXECUTIVE OFFICES

June 21, 1972

The Honorable Henry Kissinger
The White House
Washington, D. C. 20500

Dear Henry:

I know you will be home by the time you receive this note, and I do want you to call me when you have a free moment, so I may discuss with you the July 8th date.

I also want to discuss a tentative date with Norton Simon and you and me for dinner, to pursue the matter we discussed. -- or, it could be that we can meet earlier and then make dinner a social event.

I would like to firm these dates, so I am anxious to discuss this with you.

TBS:t

RECEIVED
JUL 21 1972
CENTRAL FILES

KISSINGER, HENRY A./ST

EXECUTIVE OFFICES

PHONE 985-4321

July 17, 1972

Dear Henry:

The beautiful jade elephant arrived -- it is exquisite. Rita and I are just thrilled to have it and it will always have a place of honor in our home. You were very thoughtful to remember us with this magnificent gift. We don't deserve it; all we need is your friendship and your good health to sustain you in the tremendous responsibility you are carrying.

Rita joins me in warm personal regards.

TBS:t

RECEIVED
JUL 25 1972

CENTRAL FILES

KISSINGER, HENRY A./S

PHONE 985-4321

EXECUTIVE OFFICES

July 19, 1972

Dear Henry:

We have all of the photos of celebrities
taken with you and your family at the
luncheon here at the studio and also those
taken at the dinner at Bistro.

Would you like to have the photographs
to send to the various artists, or would
you prefer that we send them from here?
We'll be happy to send them but I wondered
if you might want to send a little note on
some, for example to Raymond Burr, for being
gracious to you and the children. We'll hold
the photos and do whatever you prefer.

TBS:t

P.S. I also want to talk to you about next week
in New York -- whether you're coming in on Tuesday
night, or Wednesday.

RECEIVED

JUL 26 1972

CENTRAL FILES

PHONE 985-4321

EXECUTIVE OFFICES

January 30, 1973

Dear Henry:

I enjoyed very much seeing you in Washington, and the time spent talking.

Congratulations on the final signing of the Peace Treaty. I hope and pray as you do that the people of Viet Nam will be bright enough to find a way to resolve their differences.

I talked to Lew Wasserman about his getting
together with you. He is leaving here
February 3, for London. He will be in New
York on February 21, and will be in New York
probably a week.

I have given him your numbers and he will call
you when he is in New York to set a date.

Warm personal regards.

TBS:t

KISSINGER, HENRY A.

July 9, 1969

Dear Mr. Minister:

I greatly regret the delay in answering your letter of June 16 concerning your son-in-law, Thomas Manig.

I am informed that the University of California at Berkeley does not offer a degree of Master of Comparative Law. Harvard and the University of Chicago do offer this degree, however, and we have asked them to send your son-in-law information and application forms in this regard. Unfortunately, both institutions only accept students at the beginning of the academic year -- sometime in September. They do offer stipends to qualified foreign students, and will include information on such stipends when they write to him.

I hope that this information will be of value to Mr. Manig and that he does come to the United States in pursuit of his law studies. I hope you will let me know if I can be of any further assistance.

Dr. Gerhard Schröder
Bundesminister der Verteidigung
Bonn
Germany

HAK:TL:feg:7/9/69

RECEIVED

JUL 1 5 1969

CENTRAL FILES

This relates to HAK's talk with Schroeder in April.

S. wants son in law and daughter to sepend academic year in US.
The man's name is Thomas MANIG who passed his law exam in 1965
and will be taking a second exam ( sort of like the bar exam)in
September. He then would like to come to the States beginning
either March 1 or January 1, 1970. He would like to get a
Master of Cmparative Law, subject to HAK's advice. Harvard
and Chicago offer this degree as does Berkeley. He is interested
in comparative private or commercial law. The wife (S's daughter)
also a lawyer, plus 7-month old daughetr would come along.
S favors Harvard and is looking for some kind of stipend.

Finally, S hoped to continue exchange of views with HAK.

2284

Bonn, den 16. Juni 1969

Herrn
Henry KISSINGER
White House
Washington D.C.

Lieber Herr Kissinger!

Bei unserer letzten Begegnung im April dieses Jahres boten Sie Ihre Unterstützung bei der Durchführung des Planes meines Schwiegersohnes und unserer Tochter an, ein wissenschaftliches Jahr in den Vereinigten Staaten zu verbringen.

Ich möchte Ihnen heute einige Einzelheiten über meinen Schwiegersohn und seine Absichten übermitteln und wäre Ihnen sehr dankbar, wenn Sie dieses Anliegen fördern könnten.

Es handelt sich um Thomas MANIG, geb. 31.8.1940. Sein Abitur legte er 1960 ab. Sein Jurastudium, das er in Freiburg, Hamburg, Berlin und Bonn absolvierte, beendete er mit dem Referendarexamen im Jahre 1965 mit der Note "voll befriedigend". Im September dieses Jahres wird er das zweite Staatsexamen ablegen. Er hofft, die Promotion bis zum Jahresende mit einer Arbeit über das Thema "Die Sperrwirkung von Bundesrecht gegenüber Landesrecht" abzuschließen. Daran könnte sich - entweder zum 1. März 1970 oder notfalls auch schon zum 1. Januar 1970 - das wissenschaftliche Jahr in den Vereinigten Staaten anschließen.

- 2 -

- 2 -

Ihm schwebt - vorbehaltlich anderslautender Empfehlungen
von Ihnen - vor, in diesem Jahr den "Master of comparative
law" zu machen. Das soll sowohl in Harvard als auch in
Chicago und an der Universität von Kalifornien möglich sein.
Sein Interesse richtet sich in erster Linie auf ein Thema
im Bereich der vergleichenden Studien über internationales
Privat- oder Wirtschaftsrecht.

Meine Tochter Christina, die selbst ein abgeschlossenes
Jurastudium hat, und die nun etwa sieben Monate alte Enkelin
würden für diese Zeit mit nach den Vereinigten Staaten gehen.

Ich habe den Eindruck, daß es sehr gut wäre, wenn sich eine
Möglichkeit für ein Stipendium an der Harvard Universität
ergeben würde.

Ich hoffe, daß sich in absehbarer Zeit Gelegenheit zur
Fortsetzung unseres Gedankenaustausches ergibt. Für Ihre
Arbeit übermittle ich Ihnen meine besten Wünsche.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Thomas Manig
Referendar
53 Bonn-Lengsdorf
Hauptstraße 35

Lengsdorf, den 14.VI.1969

## Datenmäßiger Lebenslauf

Geboren am 31.VIII.1940 in Berlin

Eltern: Wolfgang Manig, Studienassessor, geboren am 24.V. 1910 in Berlin, im Jahre 1942 in Rußland gefallen

Marianne Manig, geb. Heitmann, Oberstudienrätin in Kampen/Sylt, geboren am 2.VII.1910 in Kiel

Schulen: 1947 ein Jahr Privatschule in Kampen/Sylt

1948 Einschulung in die zweite Klasse der Norddör-
ferschule Wenningstedt/Sylt

1951 Aufnahmeprüfung für das Gymnasium Sylt in Westerland/Sylt

1960 Abitur an derselben Schule

Universitäten: SS 1960 Freiburg: Deutsch, Geschichte, Kunst-
geschichte

WS 1960/61 - SS 1961 Hamburg: Jura

WS 1961/62 - WS 1962/63 EU Berlin: Jura

SS 1963 - WS 1964/65 Bonn: Jura

Examen: 21.VII.1965 erste juristische Staatsprüfung mit der Note "Vollbefriedigend"

seit September 1965 Referendar im Oberlandesgerichtsbezirk Köln

von Oktober 1965 bis September 1966 wissenschaft-
liche Hilfskraft bei der Rechts-und Staatswissen-
schaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Bonn

THE PRESIDENT'S QUETICO-SUPERIOR COMMITTEE

Charles S. Kelly
Chairman

Ernest C. Oberholtzer

Raymond A. Haik

Arthur W. Greeley
U. S. Dept. of Agriculture

Boyd L. Rasmussen
U. S. Dept. of Interior

October 29, 1968

3220 Prudential Building
Chicago, Illinois 60601

NOV 1 12 02 PM

REC'D

Brigadier General Robert L. Schulz
U. S. A. (Ret.)
Wills Building
Gettysburg, Pennsylvania 17325

Dear Bob:

If Mr. Nixon is elected to be our next president I would greatly appreciate having a contact with him in the White House similar to that which I had through you under President Eisenhower. I had a somewhat similar contact with President Kennedy; I have not had contact with President Johnson because Mr. Humphrey, the Vice President, was from Minnesota and was actively interested in the Quetico-Superior Program.

We worked as closely as possible with Secretary Freeman but both Mr. Freeman and Mr. Humphrey tended to treat this area as a state asset rather than as a national asset. We therefore advised the Department as best we could but refrained from contacting the White House so as not to appear to be going over Mr. Humphrey's head.

In saying these things I do not want it to appear that Mr. Humphrey is against us. It is just that he tended to by-pass us in what he did as to this project in favor of certain state groups, with a resulting dilution in effectiveness on the part of everyone.

At various times I have indicated to you that the

CONSERVATION PLEDGE

I give my pledge to save and faithfully to defend from waste the natural resources of my country - its soil and minerals, its forests, waters, and wildlife.

- 2 -

work of the Committee was drawing to an end.

In our report to President Eisenhower we stated that there were two things which we had to accomplish. One was to complete the acquisition by the Federal Government of the private lands lying within the so-called Roadless Area of the American portion of this watershed. That acquisition has been completed.

The second thing we had to accomplish was to work out some sort of an arrangement with the Canadian authorities for the preservation of the wilderness character of this region on both sides of the boundary.

While President Eisenhower was in office a Joint Canadian - U. S. Advisory Committee for this purpose came into being through an exchange of letters between the head of the Ontario Government via the Canadian Foreign Office in Ottawa and the President via our State Department. That Committee is proving pleasingly successful as a meeting ground for clearing administrative and similar problems on a most friendly basis. I am chairman of the American section and the Ontario Minister of Lands and Forests is chairman of the Canadian section.

The work of that Joint Committee is continuing and needs the help and backing of the President's Committee in order to be most effective.

During the Johnson administration Mr. Freeman, Secretary of Agriculture, had a special committee study this program at the request of Minnesota conservationists. As a result of the recommendations of that committee the area was substantially enlarged by order of the Secretary of Agriculture and a program for acquisition of additional lands lying along the waterways, outside of the former boundaries of the Roadless Area in Minnesota, was approved. It will not be as difficult to have the private lands in this larger area brought under public ownership as it was for us originally to bring about similar acquisition in the original zone. But it needs doing. The President's Committee can be particularly helpful here.

I enclose a copy of a statement concerning this program which was brought to President Kennedy's attention at the time he took office, together with a request that he designate someone similar to yourself to be the Committee's point of contact in the White House. President Kennedy designated a point of contact which worked out very well. If you are agreeable, I would like to bring that statement up to date and ask your help in having it brought to the attention of Mr. Nixon, if elected, for a similar purpose. I would like from

you a list of names of six or more men who could be the point
of contact, with your appraisal of each one's background.
Here I am particularly mindful that in your case you in effect
were a member of the President's family and that therefore
this was a personal matter rather than a political matter.
If it is possible to achieve a similar relationship under
Mr. Nixon we would appreciate it.

In closing, I must state that our Committee received
more effective support from your Chief than from any other
of the five presidents under whom we have served. I also
repeat a casual remark of one gentleman in the Budget before
whom I have appeared that one of the unique things about our
Committee was the manner in which it survived changes in
administration and therefore avoided interferences with
its progress.

I invite your comment. I expect to be in Washington
before the end of the year and will make it a point to see you
then, if that meets your immediate convenience.

With best personal wishes,

crs

This report concerns the President's Quetico-Superior Committee appointed in 1934 by President Franklin D. Roosevelt and since re-appointed by presidential orders at four-year intervals. The Committee is non-partisan and serves without expense to the Government. It is directed to advise with, and invoke the aid of, specified departments of the Federal Government and of the State of Minnesota and of conservation groups concerned with the preservation and proper development, in the public interest, of the Quetico-Superior Area. The Committee has had the active support of both Minnesota Senators, of the local Congressman, of all national conservation organizations, of labor, of the Congress, and of the last five National Administrations.

The Quetico-Superior Area extends from Rainy Lake to Lake Superior. Through it runs the international border between Minnesota and Ontario. In this region are ten million acres of beautiful lakes, rivers and forests, encompassing the only international wilderness canoe country in mid-continent. Its recreational significance is very great. Fifty million people live within a radius of 750 miles.

For forty years conservationists backed by the Government have sought to protect this area from uses which would destroy its wilderness character. In the 1920's a plan was developed for this purpose with Secretary of Agriculture Jardine. This is the Quetico-Superior Program. It had as its major objectives:

1. The protection of the wilderness character of the interior lake country.

2. The administration of the forests under modern forestry practices with the above ideal in mind.

3. Agreement between the United States and Canada as to mutual principles of sound resource management and use applicable to an international wilderness watershed:

This program has had the endorsement and support of each succeeding administration. In 1934 President Roosevelt, in recognition of the public importance of the area, appointed the first "President's Quetico-Superior Committee", consisting of five members, two appointed by the Secretaries of Agriculture and Interior, respectively, and three civilians appointed directly by the President. Two of the original civilian members are still serving. The Committee has been backed repeatedly by Congressional actions, Executive Orders, and administrative decrees and regulations.

Important excerpts from the Executive Order appointing the Committee as now in effect appear inside the back cover of the attached 1953 Report of the Committee to the President.

At the present time the committee's program has the strong endorsement of Senators Hubert Humphrey and Eugene McCarthy of Minnesota and of local Congressman John Blatnik. There is wide national support by diverse organizations and groups. A chronology of the official action taken from 1909 to 1953 which affected this program appears, beginning with the center spread, in the attached 1953 Report to the President.

Much has been accomplished. Privately-owned lands within the wilderness area in Minnesota have been reduced from 117,000 acres in 1947 to about 16,000 acres now.

An airspace reservation to protect the wilderness environment of the area has been put into effect.

Co-operation with Canada, one of the original goals of the Quetico-Superior Program, has matured steadily over the years. In 1960 this co-operation was formalized by an official exchange of letters among the United States State Department, the Department of External Affairs, and the Province of Ontario, establishing an International Committee whose function is to work toward mutual protection of the wilderness character of the area on both sides of the border.

Still to be done are the following two tasks:

1. Acquisition of the remaining 16,000 acres of private lands within the Boundary Waters Canoe Area of the Superior National Forest, and

2. Further co-ordination of the policies of the agencies of both countries having to do with the region.

Respectfully submitted,

Charles S. Kelly,
Chairman
President's Quetico-Superior Committee

Enclosures
1953 Report to the President

<table><tr><td>CLASS OF SERVICE</td></tr><tr><td>This is a fast message</td></tr><tr><td>unless its deferred char-</td></tr><tr><td>acter is indicated by the</td></tr><tr><td>proper symbol.</td></tr></table>

WESTERN UNION
W. P. MARSHALL
CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD
TELEGRAM

R. PRESIDENT

<table><tr><td colspan="2">SYMBOLS</td></tr><tr><td>DL</td><td>= Day Letter</td></tr><tr><td>NL</td><td>= Night Letter</td></tr><tr><td>LT</td><td>= International Letter Telegram</td></tr></table>

The filing time shown in the date line on domestic telegrams is LOCAL TIME at point of origin. Time of receipt is LOCAL TIME.

BA034 PA102

DEC 5 1968

P UNA048 PDF 14 EXTRA=EDGEWATER NJER 3 1017A EST=
=DR HENRY A KISSINGER=

419 BEACON ST BSN=

OUR WARMEST CONGRATULATIONS ON THE OCCASION OF YOUR
APPOINTMENT AS ADVISER TO OUR FUTURE PRESIDENT WE
CONSIDER THIS AN HONOR FOR EVERY MEMBER OF THE FAMILY
AGAIN OUR WARMEST PERSONAL REGARDS=

MAX SCHUSTER (BROTHERINLAW OF JULIUS KISSINGER

FORMERLY OF MUNICH=

WU1201 (R2-65)

THE COMPANY WILL APPRECIATE SUGGESTIONS FROM ITS PATRONS CONCERNING ITS SERVICE

RECEIVED
FEB 21 1969

CENTRAL FILES