RECEIVED
KISSINGER'S OFFICE

WHB 103 (2201) (2-231724E 069) PD 03/10/73 2201

ICS IPMRNCZ CSP 1973 MAR 12 AM 8 40

ZCZC 2133494660 NL TDRN NORTHRIDGE CA 100 03-10 1001P EST

PMS DOCTOR HENRY KISSINGER
WHITE HOUSE DC

HOW CAN A COMMON AMERICAN CITIZEN RATIONALIZE TO SEEMING CONFLICT
BETWEEN OUR HEAD LONG RUSH TO OFFER MASSIVE ECONOMIC AID TO
REBUILDING THE COUNTRY OF OUR RECENT ENEMY NORTH VIETNAM VERSUS
OUR SAD SUPPORT OF THE ORIGINAL AMERICAN WHO ISNT EVEN A UNITED
STATE CITIZEN AS REPRESENTED BY THE LAST FEW DAYS PATHETIC ACTIONS
AT WOUNDED KNEE SOUTH DAKOTA PLEASE ANSWER ON PRIME TIME TV
RATHER THAN AS PRESIDENT NIXON CHOOSES TO ADDRESS THE NATION
AT 9 AM ON RADIO WHEN NO ONE IS LISTENING

JOHN H. STICKNEY 9730 RESEDA BLVD APT 114 NORTHRIDGE CALIFORNIA

The White House
Washington

KISSINGER, HENRY A./S

1973 MAR 10 PM 10 17

RECEIVED

MAR 14 1973

CENTRAL FILES

FORM 0805 PRINTED BY THE STANDARD REGISTER COMPANY, U. S. A.

THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON

9/28/71

Coleman:

Re Chicago trip:

An old school pal of HAK's, Paul Stiefel, who now lives in Skokie, has heard that HAK is coming to Chicago on Oct. 13. I indicated there is some discussion about it but that I knew of no definite as yet. He would like to see HAK, if at all possible (says he drove HAK to the airport last time he was in town, but I don't remember anything about that. Maybe he did, maybe he didn't.)

Can be reached at his office: 312/278-4100 or

at home: 312/OR 4-0962.

Dianne

KISSINGER, HENRY A./S

Telephone 2/2/70

STILLE

Type of Request & Date

(Last name and pending date)

Name: Mrx Stille Mr. Stille, Corriere della Sera of Milan

Request: Says he saw HAK in Washington NY over the last weekend and indicated he would like to see him re a profile on HAK that he is doing. HAK said yes but indicated his schedule is very busy. Mr. Stille is therefore willing to come at a later date.

Contact him at 212/AL 4-2249 or LO 4-0012

DRY's Recommendation:

HAK's Answer: Yes

Date and Time:

Party Contacted:

Additional Information:

Resolution:

RECEIVED

MAR 1 0 1972

FINAL FILES

ROTARY CLUB OF NEW YORK

THE COMMODORE HOTEL, NEW YORK, N. Y. 10017 - 212 - 686 - 8255

PRESIDENT

Dan O. Henry

VICE PRESIDENTS

Herbert J. Stiefel

Rudolf P. Berle

TREASURER

Malcolm H. Smith

DIRECTORS

James W. Crawford

John C. Ellis

Richard A. Granger

Victor E. Lambert

William T. Louth

Arthur R. McElfish

John C. van Eck

DIVISION HEADS

CLUB SERVICE

Ben Itkin

COMMUNICATIONS

James Whitford

COMMUNITY SERVICE

Wilbur H. Peck

INTERNATIONAL
SERVICE

Carl H. Ficke

MEMBERSHIP
DEVELOPMENT

Paul C. Tully

VOCATIONAL SERVICE

Edward B. Hunter

WEEKLY PROGRAM

Eric W. Stoetzner

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

Paul E. Jaynes

May 25, 1971

Dr. Henry A. Kissinger
The White House
Washington, D.C.

Dear Dr. Kissinger:

The Society of Foreign Consuls in New York and the Rotary Club of New York have scheduled a joint luncheon on September 23, 1971. At that time they would like to have the most important speaker to address the distinguished audience about the foreign policy problems of the United States. It was suggested to us dear Dr. Kissinger to invite you and we hope you will do us the favour to be our speaker on this day.

As you know, the Rotary Club of New York is the most important international Rotary Club in the world. We will provide you with a top audience and there is no doubt that your address would be received with unusual publicity.

In order to introduce the prominent members of the audience to you, we shall arrange a reception shortly before noon. The luncheon starts at 12:15; the beginning of the speech is scheduled for 1:10 and the meeting will be over at 1:45 sharp.

In order to make this joint effort of the Society of Foreign Consuls in New York and the Rotary Club of New York a well-planned endeavor, we would appreciate hearing from you soon whether you will accept our suggestion. We would be pleased to provide you with a unique and outstanding audience.

MÉTRO
2000

A NON-PROFIT URBAN SCIENCE INSTITUTE

C. DARWIN STOLZENBACH
DIRECTOR

Paris Caddesi 33/1
Ankara, Turkey
11 July 1970

Dear Henry,

When the President appointed you I felt a little better about the new administration, simply because I like to see our President advised by intelligent and honest people. Our former colleague, John Montgomery, took a more cynical view of it — pointing out that your main forte has been the politics of Europe, not of the developing nations. Well, chacun a son gout.

Now, I am beginning to feel that both John and I missed the point of your deep commitment to the Kissinger doctrine on how limited warfare should be conducted. Could it be that both your intelligence and integrity are getting in the way of US extrication from Vietnam?

You were reported (once only) as having been opposed to the Cambodia venture, but this fact (if true) was naturally never confirmed. Trying to look at it from your point of view, I cannot escape the thought that having a chance to test one's theories at the highest level poses an almost irresistible temptation. You may not recall that you laid bare your ambitions, lying on a bunk in a US Army billet in Korea, as long ago as 1951.

As friend, citizen, and father of an SP-4 in VN, I would welcome your reaction to my observations, and would treat it in confidence.

Hon. Henry A. Kissinger
The White House
Washington

RECEIVED
JUL 20 1970

CENTRAL FILES

2015 N STREET, N.W.

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20036

202/233-2341

-2-

In short, the correct analysis suggest that a limit on defensive weapons is the most important restriction to be negotiated -- valuable in itself and presupposed by every other important restriction.

Worse, however, you are opting to try for limits on offensive weapons that are of little significance. Since the U. S. proposal does not promise to halt multiple warheads, any agreed limits on offensive weapons do not promise a lasting inhibition on offensive force capability.

The position your remarks suggested is risky for the Administration. An agreement to forego ABM is based on the cliche that nuclear war is mutual suicide. Nothing that may happen after the agreement is reached will shake people's faith in that cliche and make them regret having reached the agreement. But a limit on offensive weapons that does not limit MIRV may disillusion a generation. To get the agreement ratified, it would be necessary to suggest that the offensive nuclear arms race was being ended. When this failed to be true, there would be political charges that the President had been fooled. And there is no way to end the qualitative missile race.

If I were advising the President, I would recommend continuing to discuss limits on offensive weapons while agreeing in principle to a separate treaty on ABM. The President could then announce that the ABM talks were to go forward between technical experts. The President could not be accused of failing to try for enough -- he would still be trying for an agreement on offensive weapons also. And his success in advancing the ABM talks to a more promising stage could be put forward as real progress.

The ABM has been the centerpiece of the attack on the military-industrial complex, and it has been the touchstone of the arms race opposition to Administration policies. It would be sensible politically to neutralize this issue.

All good negotiators know that there are limits to either side's ability to manipulate the situation in extended negotiations. At some point, the shrewdest negotiators have to decide to seize a "bird in the hand." If the Arms Control Agency is told to forget about other agencies and bring back that agreement, I think they could do so. It would be a stunning and historic achievement for the President for which we would all be most grateful. I can assure you, based upon discussions with leading members of FAS, that we would applaud, not complain, if the President moved toward a first separate agreement on ABM.

I know that the Soviets have treated the President rudely in the past, and we both know how unpleasant it can be to deal with them at times. But the point of these talks is an eventual agreement. And limiting ABM is what we originally started these talks to do. If we cannot

OFFICIAL

6/22/72

STONE

(Open)

(Last name and pending date)

Type of Request & Date

GENERAL

KISSINGER, HENRY A.

Name:

Mr. Jeremy Stone, Director

Federation of American Scientists

KISSINGER, HENRY A./S

(546-3300)

Request:

Mr. Stone just got back from China he would like to have 15 minutes with Mr. Kissinger when he returns from his trip. He wants to tell Mr. Kissinger about the agreement in principle to have Chinese scientists come to the US and to seek your help in arranging for the visas. The agreement is not ready to be announced since it is just "in principle." No urgent but he would like to tell Dr. Kissinger about the agreement.

CSH's Recommendation:

HAK's Answer: 6/26/72

Date and Time:

Party Contacted:

Additional Information:

Resolution:

DEC 30 1968

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR CULTURAL FREEDOM

INTERNATIONAL SECRETARIAT

104, BOULEVARD HAUSSMANN PARIS (8') TELEPHONE : 387-37-59 CABLE : CULTURLIB-PARIS

PRESIDENT

December 24, 1968

Professor Henry Kissinger
Office of the President-Elect
Hotel Pierre
Fifth Avenue and 61st St.
New York, N.Y.
U. S. A.

Dear Henry,

Back in Paris and trying to assess beyond the extraordinary public attention, the Princeton seminar. No time is needed, however, to thank you for what you did. I shall never forget that on the day of your appointment to the extraordinary post you now hold you kept a promise to be with us. Men of lesser stature might have sent apologies. Your presence was of large significance not only at home but among our friends overseas. I am deeply grateful to you.

I made mistakes in connection with the seminar--too many participants, an agenda that was too broad, perhaps a lack of balance in representation, though we had some bad luck with illnesses and, as you know, I had hoped that some of the other new men around the President-elect would be with us. There have been a number of thoughtful articles in the European press--I attach, for example, one by Marion Dönhoff.

Perhaps our conference overemphasized the doubts of the American intellectual--though this may have been useful before we enter a new period of what some of us hope will be constructive thought. After the Princeton meeting, a group of us met in New York and we are on the way to establish an American affiliate of IACF, with Paul Doty as chairman. This group can be a link to our world-wide affiliates and publications and I think serve a useful and constructive purpose at home. Whenever you are ready we want you as a member.

.../...

Our European, Asian and Latin American friends, even those critical of the U.S. in the past, are looking to the U.S. for political wisdom and intellectual, cultural and spiritual content and inventiveness. With this in mind the new Administration, I believe, would find friends around the world.

We shall try to have ideas. As I told you if we can ever be
helpful to you simply call on us.

And now good luck and again my heartfelt thanks.

GENERAL

FGL-11-1/KISSINGER, HENRY A.

WH 5-1

SP2-3-8

KISSINGER, HENRY A. / S*

MAR 15 1971

Dear Shep:

It was good to hear from you again and very pleasing to know of your son-in-law's interest in working for the government and particularly on my staff. As you may know, there is a freeze on hiring for quite a while now and everyone is affected by it. But I will keep Dr. Jennings in mind and ask my staff secretary to do the same.

I will ask my secretary to send you a copy of the Annual Review of Foreign Policy under separate cover.

Please stay in touch.

Mr. Shepard Stone
1, Quai Aux Fleurs
75 - Paris 4e
France

EXECUTIVE

FCB-11-1/KISSINGER, HENRY A.
KISSINGER, HENRY A. /S/

Dear Shep:

I was pleased to receive your letter of November 3. Your kind words of praise are very much appreciated.

As I am sure you have guessed, the pressures of my work have not yet relaxed and I have come to the conclusion that it will not be possible for me to attend the conference in Columbia in early December. I had hoped to be able to do this and am disappointed to have these plans fall through.

In addition to missing the Conference, I am sorry to miss seeing you. Please stay in touch.

Mr. Shepard Stone, President
International Association for Cultural Freedom
International Secretariat
104, Boulevard Haussmann
Paris (3e) France

jlp:11/27/72

BILDERBERG MEETINGS

Remarks made by Shep Stone

European - U. S. relations are in a fragile condition. There is a type of Schadenfreude about each other's problems. On the eve of important economic, security and political negotiations there is an almost childlike tendency to scratch away at each other, to take advantage of each other's difficulties. Statements are made, actions are taken which exacerbate the situation to the point where we appear to be the main adversaries of each other rather than partners or units which must continue to work closely together if we are to preserve what is most precious for both. We have recent examples when proposals made on one side of the ocean are immediately attacked on the other side from a negative point of view rather than analyzed critically but constructively.

What is required in our coming negotiations and relations is that

1) the U. S. should approach Europe as if the European Community is a unit more united than in fact it is at present and

2) Europeans should assume, notwithstanding Watergate and other internal American problems, that the United States will remain one of the most powerful countries in the world.

This strained situation is a challenge to Bilderberg. Bilderberg was founded to anticipate and try to modify European-American problems. Our task is to try to find ways to fortify and not antagonize each other.

Shep Stone