DRAFT TO TAFT, HOTCHKISS, CHOATE AND KENT SCHOOLS FOR THE
DAUGHTERS OF NIARCHOS' FRIEND:

To the Director of Admissions:

I am writing to recommend two very accomplished young ladies
for admission in September: Maria Letizia ("Maritzina")
Caltagirone, who has applied for the 11th grade, and her
sister Giulia, who hopes to enter the 10th grade.

While I do not know the Caltagirone girls personally, a
close friend for whose judgement I have enormous respect
has taken an interest in them and thinks very highly of them
both. The girls were born in Rome and have lived also in
Paris and New York, where they are at present attending
school. They speak Italian, French and English fluently,
and Maritzina is also studying Spanish. I am told they are
both good students, active in school affairs and well-liked
by their classmates.

As both are eager to attend [Taft, Hotchkiss, a top American
boarding school] I hope you will act favorably on their
applications.

Sincerely,

OK as edited

(NOTE: While Niarchos asked you to write to Trustees, it will
be more advantageous to write to Admissions. With
the exception of Paul Mellon for Choate and Strobe
Talbott for Hotchkiss, I don't see any others you know
very well, if at all.)

TWO EAST SIXTY-SEVENTH STREET
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10021

New York - January 6, 1987

Dr. Henry Kissinger
350 Park Avenue
26th Floor
New York, New York 10022

Dear Dr. Kissinger:

Following our telephone conversation I am writing
to give you some information regarding my daughters.

Maria Letizia (Maritzina) was born in Rome on
November 7, 1970 - Giulia was also born in Rome on
September 20, 1971. They are both Italian citizens
but resident of the United States.

In 1974 we moved to Paris where the girls started
school. Four years later, in 1979, we came to New York.
Here Maritzina and Giulia have been and still are attending
Marymount Fifth Avenue. They are fluent in English and
Italian and speak good French. Maritzina is also studying
Spanish. She is an excellent student, taking honor courses
with an A-B+average. Giulia is a good student with more
artistic tendencies.

Both my daughters are very outgoing and greatly
adjustable to different people and diverse environments.
They both would very much like to go to boarding school,
not only to benefit academically but also to have an
opportunity to participate in athletic activities.

So far their extracurricular activities vary.
Maritzina is involved in community service (tutoring
younger children); she is a member of the Foreign Language
Club and chairman of the International Club in her school.
Giulia is on her school yearbook staff and is also involved
in drama productions. Their hobbies are horseback riding,
skiing, swimming and jogging.

./

HAK'

Niarchos asks you to look over the list of
trustees of 4 "colleges" -- prep schools,
actually -- to identify those people you
know and can write to on behalf of the
daughters of a friend of his -- unnamed.

Take it from this preppy -- this is the
sure way to get the girls turned down.
Looks too much like wealth and power trying
to circumvent the system.

Better to tell Niarchos you will write to
the directors of admission.

No, I'll do it his way and have
checked the names I am willing
to write to

Draft letter suggesting the
directors of admission

Will handle personally

ssm

Page 2.

TRUSTEES (ctd.)

Robert C.LANPHIER III '50
Springfield, Illinois

George L.MacDONALD, Jr., M.D.
Marblehead, Massachusetts

John H.METTLER '60
North Haven, Connecticut

C. Walter NICHOLS III '55
Katonah, NY

J. Lester PARSONS III '57
Bernardsville, New Jersey

Richard S. ROBIE, Jr. '50
Marblehead, Massachusetts

Shirley W. RYAN
Kenilworth, Illinois

Stephen J. SCHULTE '56
New York, New York

Damaris B. SKOURAS '74
New York, New York

Sara BARNES SONNE '58
Tuxedo Park, New York

William G. SPEARS '56
Greenwich, Connecticut

Roger L.STEVENS '28
Washington, D.D.

Henry G. STIFEL '46
Short Hills, New Jersey

Margaret FORELLI URCIUOLI '60
Old Greenwich, Connecticut

Celeste CHEATHAM WEISGLASS
New York, New York

/..

HONORARY TRUSTEES

John D. ARCHBOLD, O.B.E. '29
Upperville, Virginia

Elizabeth HYDE BROWNELL '21
Greenwich, Connecticut

Bruce S. GELB '45
New York, New York

Larry A. HART '32
Dallas, Texas

Richard R. HIGGINS '18
Dedham, Massachusetts

Worthington JOHNSON '32
Fairfield, Connecticut

Paul MELLON '25
Upperville, Virginia

Gerrish H. MILIKEN
Greenwich, Connecticut

Craig D. MUNSON '16
Cheshire, Connecticut

Seymour St.JOHN '31
Westerly, Rhode Island

Daniel G.TENNEY, Jr. '31
Locust Valley, New York

New York, 8.12.86
A.B.

Page 2.

HOTCHKISS (ctd.)

Wendell W. ANDERSON, Jr., '42, B.A.

Grosse Pointe Farms, Michigan

David W. BENTLEY '56

New Canaan, Connecticut

Howard C. BISSELL '55, B.A.

Charlotte, North Carolina

Edgar M. CULLMAN '36, B.A.

New York, New York

Marvin J. DECKOFF '49, LL.B.

New York, New York

Wesley M. DIXON, Jr. '45, B.A.

Lake Forest. (Illinois

Willard ENTEMAN '55, PhD.

Providence, Rhode Island

S. Parker GILBERT '52, V.A.

New York, New York

Richard W. GOSS II '51, B.A.

San Francisco, California

Judith O. HIGGINS, B.A., M.ed.

Greenwich, Connecticut

Patsy HUDSON, B.A.

Grosse Pointe Farms, Michigan

Thomas M. KERESEY '49, B.A.

Palm Beach, Florida

Dan W. LUFKIN '49, B.A., M.B.A

Lakeville, CT

Gay P. LORD, M.A.

Stevenson, Maryland

Forrest E. MARS, Jr. '49, M.B.A.

McLean, Virginia

Raymond J. MCGUIRE '75, B.A., LL.B., M.B.A.

New York, New York

/..

KENT

| BOARD OF TRUSTEES | Term Expires |
|---|---|
| Robert S. ANDERSON '60 <br> New Canaan, Connecticut | 1986 |
| Theodore F. BROPHY '41 <br> Stamford, Connecticut | 1986 |
| J.Elizabeth MORGAN, M.D., P.C. '63 <br> McLean, Virginia | 1986 |
| Robert A. WARD '53 <br> Kent, Connecticut | 1986 |
| Cornelia KELLER BIDDLE '64 <br> Washington, D.C. | 1987 |
| William HAWKINS '30 <br> Houston, Texas | 1987 |
| William LEE PRYOR, III '48 <br> New York, New York | 1987 |
| Ann DICKINSON TURNER '65 <br> Ridgewood, New Jersey | 1987 |
| G. MCMURTRIE GODLEY <br> Morris, New York | 1988 |
| Lucinda WATSON MEHRAN '67 <br> San Francisco, California | 1988 |
| Richard I. PURNELL '36 <br> Locust Valley, New York | 1988 |
| Brandon W. SWEITZER '60 <br> New Canaan, Connecticut | 1988 |
| Judith BLOUGH WENTZ <br> New Canaan, Connecticut | 1988 |

/..

Page 2.

KENT (ctd.)

<table><tr><td>Charles B. COLMORE, Jr.'31</td><td>1989</td></tr><tr><td>Baltimore, Maryland</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Gifford T. FOLEY '65</td><td>1989</td></tr><tr><td>Ridgefield, Connecticut</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Lucien R. FOUKE, Jr. 59</td><td>1989</td></tr><tr><td>St. Louis, Missouri</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Arthur COLLINS '48</td><td>1990</td></tr><tr><td>Stamford, Connecticut</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Peter H. CONZE '38</td><td>1990</td></tr><tr><td>Greenwich, Connecticut</td><td></td></tr></table>

New York, 8.12.86

A.B.

Page 2.

T A F T (ctd.)

Richard L. PARISH, Jr. '41

Riverside, Connecticut

William A. PORTEOUS, III '55

New Orleans, Louisiana

William H. RISLEY '35

Litchfield, Connecticut

Walter S. ROSENBERRY, III '49

Englewood, Colorado

L. Clifford SCHROEDER '49

Richmond, Virginia

Sara L. SCHUPF

Greenwich, Connecticut

Frank V. SNYDER '39

Greenwich, Connecticut

Dudley S. TAFT '58

Cincinnati, Ohio

George D. UTLEY, III '74

Springdale, Connecticut

Archbold D. VanBEUREN '75

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

John L. VOGELSTEIN '52

New York, New York

Sally CHILDS WALSH '75

Brooklyn, New York

John W. WALTING, III '43

Greenwich, Connecticut

New York, 8.12.86

A.B.

KENT SCHOOL
KENT, CONNECTICUT 06757

FEB - 2 1987

January 30, 1987

Dr. Henry A. Kissinger
350 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10022

Dear Henry,

Thank you for your thoughtful letter in support of the applications of the Caltagirone girls. I have met them on two occasions, once at the school and once in New York City. We have a mutual friend in Jane Gould who suggested that they look at Kent. I was impressed by the girls' refined manners and mature outlook on their own education.

I do hope you will be able to be our Prize Day guest of honor on May 31 and will look forward to hearing from you soon.

RWS:eg

Dr. Henry A. Kissinger

June 11, 1987
Page -2-

There is really no need to go into great detail about the particular investment situation that was the subject of the story, but I thought I would provide you with a little background. As you know, Bill is not a promoter. He only invests his own money for his own account. He had been investing in the oil business with his former roommate for a number of years, and several investors including his close friend, the late Justin Dart, wanted to invest with him. Justin was fully aware of the structure of the investment and Bill certainly never hid anything from anyone. Bill invested $4 million of his own money on exactly the same basis as all of the other investors and lost it, along with a potential $15 million of oil reserves. As you know, each investment carries with it a different level of risk and an investment in oil drilling certainly is very high on the scale of risks, something that every investor in this transaction certainly knew.

A number of people, including several other journalists, called me at the time of this article and couldn't understand why it appeared it all - - - and certainly could not understand how it got such prominent attention from the Wall Street Journal. As one reporter from a competitive newspaper said "After reading it, I couldn't get the point of the article. Simon didn't do anyting illegal or unethical. He just lost some money for people who went into an oil deal with him and that happens every day".

More importantly, from everything that has been happening to Bill since the article, it appears that no one anywhere has paid any attention to it. I would be happy to sit with you and bring you fully up to date on Bill's recent activities; but as you know, Bill and I have been actively involved in establishing a network of financial institutions based in the United States that will span the Pacific, including Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore and Tokyo. In order to accomplish this, we have completed the acquisition of three savings and loan associations, one commercial bank and established a major real estate company. We are also establishing a venture capital investment activity. Further, we have under discussion the acquisiton of several very large financial institutions. In order to implement all of these areas, we have hired first rate people, such as Preston Martin, with extensive experience in all of the areas of our activity to work full time for us.

Finally, we have entered into a major relationship with Ariadne Australia Ltd., a publicly traded Australian company with equity in excess of 1.5 billion Australian

Dr. Henry A. Kissinger

June 11, 1987

Page -3-

Dollars. We have formed a full service merchant bank with them
and have obtained a commitment from them to invest at least
$200 million in the United States. We think it could be a lot
more. A number of other investors have approached Bill about
providing capital in connection with this investment strategy.
Although we are extremely cautious about bringing in other
partners, we have made an exception for Giovanni Agnelli, a
long time friend of Bill.

You, Bill and I have talked for several years about
working together in the financial area, and I really hope we
can. What Bill and I are doing now is tremendously exciting
and we believe it offers extraordinary opportunity. Please let
me know if you have any questions about this letter. I look
forward to seeing you and Nancy soon.

Best personal regards.

GLPfac

GIBSON DUTIN & CRUTCHER

JAN.05 '87 14:36 KISSINGER ASSOCIATES, WASH. DC

P.02

January 5, 1987

FOR HAK

FROM: Rosemary
RE: Yom Kippur

Sorry about the delay but the problem was in getting access to a religious holidays calendar that went back in time. Here is what I pieced together re Yom Kippur:

1973 Yom Kippur - Oct. 6 (the war): As you wrote in YOU p. 466, you spent the previous evening (Friday, October 5 - i.e. following sundown) closeted in the Waldorf Towers, for private dinner.

1974 Yom Kippur occurred on September 26 which was during the visit of Italian President Leone. The White House State dinner took place the previous evening, September 25. Since you were present for the Leone visit and probably attended the State Dinner (I don't have the guest list), this would have been the one. I think you did attend.

1975 Yom Kippur occurred on Monday, September 15. There is no calendar for your activities the previous Sunday or Sunday evening, though your calendar does show you in D.C. on Saturday and early at State on Monday.

1976 Yom Kippur occurred on Monday, October 4. On Saturday October 2 you went to Hilton Head for a speech; there is no calendar for Sunday, October 3, but presumably you returned to Washington that day, as your calendar shows you at State early Monday, the 4th. That evening (which I think is after the end of Yom Kippur) you hosted a dinner at State for Foreign Minister Silveira of Brazil, beginning at 8:15 p.m.

DEPARTMENT OF STATE
AMBASSADOR AT LARGE
WASHINGTON

March 20, 1987

Dr. Henry Kissinger
Suite 1021
1800 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006

Dear Henry:

I read with interest your column of March 8 in *The Washington Post*. I found myself in complete agreement with your description of Soviet negotiating behavior. I differ, however, with several of your points regarding the current Nuclear and Space Talks and the US approach to those talks.

First, you note the problem of asymmetrical negotiating attitudes, resulting in the US offering a stream of compromises while the Soviets remain intransigent. While I agree that this problem has plagued us in the past, I do not believe it is unavoidable. In fact, this Administration has done a remarkable job of sticking to the basic principles of its original arms control positions, while responding with tactical flexibility when the Soviets have shown flexibility of their own. We are closing in on an INF agreement that is almost identical to our original proposal. Similarly, the agreed elements in the START group keep our ingoing principles intact. And in the Defense and Space group, despite Gorbachev's best efforts, we have resisted adding any new limits to the ABM Treaty. In fact, I find curious your assertion that SDI is a good illustration of our self-imposed handicaps; the claim is based not on anything that has happened to date but rather on your prediction that we will agree to crippling restrictions on SDI research permitted by the Treaty, despite our success in resisting such restrictions thus far. The President made his firmness abundantly clear at Reykjavik.

Second, you claim that no compromise is possible between the Soviet intention to kill SDI and the Administration commitment to maintain it. To my mind, this is too absolute a generalization. (It seems you also think so, since the 5-point proposal you offer at the end of your piece is based on just such a compromise.) Surely, no compromise is possible if the Soviets can accept no outcome other than the effective end of SDI, but I am not convinced that they would not settle for an outcome that provided predictability to the strategic defense area while permitting us to retain a robust research program. Many factors bear upon such a judgment, including the possibility of a dialogue along the lines some Soviet scientists have advanced aimed at identifying the technologies now understood to be based upon other physical principles and the potential ABM components of systems based upon such

- 2 -

technologies. Using such definitions, one can conceive of a
regime that would allow SDI to proceed at a rapid but
predictable pace. Incidentally, the testing of sensors (other
than ABM radars), which you claim would be to Soviet advantage,
is actually the one component of SDI which General Abrahamson's
people say is most crucial to the progress of our program.

Third, you misstate our proposal for limits on SDI; at no
time have we proposed a 10-year deployment moratorium followed
by a two-year period for negotiation. In his July 25 letter to
Gorbachev, the President proposed a 5-year period of
nonwithdrawal from the ABM Treaty followed by a two-year
negotiation. At Reykjavik, we proposed a 10-year nonwithdrawal
period, with each side having the right to deploy immediately
at the end of that period.

Fourth, I differ with your assessment of the zero option in
INF. As Senator Nunn said last week, it represents a good
asymmetrical reduction, with the Soviets eliminating over 1300
warheads and the US eliminating about 200. It does not
eliminate the American means of retaliating from Europe; we
would retain all of our nuclear-capable aircraft in Europe,
including F-111s with range greater than the Pershing II, our
short-range missiles and nuclear artillery, and the 400 SLBM
RVs we have dedicated to NATO. Given these remaining systems,
as well as our extensive conventional contribution to NATO's
defense, I believe talk of decoupling is unjustified.

Finally, let me turn to your 5-point proposal. I find that
much of what you recommend has already been done. You
recommend a statement of overall strategy; I enunciated such a
strategic concept in a speech to the Philadelphia World Affairs
Council in February 1985, just before the NST negotiations
began. This concept called for radical reductions in the power
of offensive nuclear arms, as well as the stabilization of the
offense/defense relationship, over the next ten years, followed
by a period of transition to greater reliance on defenses,
should new defensive technologies prove feasible. You
recommend an offer to the Soviets to discuss quantitative
restraints on SDI deployment and testing geared to the level of
offensive forces; we have been trying for two years in Geneva
to engage the Soviets in a discussion of the nature of a
cooperative transition that would involve such restraints. You
recommend an offer to reduce strategic forces in a manner that
would limit the capacity for surprise attacks by either side;
it is exactly this goal that underlies our insistence that a
START agreement include strict sublimits on heavy ICBM RVs, on
ICBM RVs, and on strategic ballistic missile RVs. Because of
our determination to reduce the capacity for surprise attacks,
we have held to this position despite strenuous Soviet
resistance.

- 3 -

I disagree strongly with your proposal to commit now to SDI deployment. While the research program has made great progress, it has yet to determine if prospective defenses would be survivable. Certainly there is nothing to be gained by deploying defenses that could not survive an attack; in fact, such an action could be seriously destabilizing. We also do not know yet if defenses would be cost-effective at the margin. Deploying defenses that could be overcome more cheaply by proliferating offenses would serve only to encourage the Soviets to do just that, touching off a costly and destabilizing offense-defense arms race. Waiting to ensure that these feasibility criteria can be met is not a subterfuge for attacking SDI, it is a prudent step to ensure our programs serve the goal of enhancing stability. It is also the only step that can garner the support we need in the Congress to sustain necessary SDI funding. My extensive consultations on the Hill have indicated that a deployment decision now, or a threat to abrogate the ABM Treaty, would backfire to the significant detriment of the SDI program.

In conclusion, let me dissent as well from the general point made at the beginning of your piece that the Administration is pursuing the traditional agenda of the past two decades with only minor variations. Our arms control agenda is substantially different from that of the past. Where past agreements allowed substantial buildups in offensive arsenals, we are pursuing substantial and stabilizing reductions. We are insisting on much stricter verification measures. And we will accept no agreement that does not allow us aggressively to explore the possibility of shifting to a defense-based deterrence.

HENRY A. KISSINGER

August 20, 1987

Dear John:

As you know, soccer is the sport that outside
the United States generates the most passionate
interest.

Every four years some 140 teams compete over a
two-year period to qualify for the final two
rounds which contain 24 teams. That last com-
petition extends over the period of a month
and culminates in a final match watched on global
television by at least a billion people.

The World Cup alternates between the Western
Hemisphere and Europe. The last World Cup was
in 1986 in Mexico. The next will be in Italy
in 1990. I think it would be a great coup if
the United States could host it in 1994. The
soccer World Cup elicits more widespread and
passionate spectator interest than the Olympics.
It can take place in eight cities across the
United States culminating in a final at a site
yet to be determined. It would be a great show-
case for our country and a great boost for the
sport in America. It will also be economically
very beneficial to the United States as a result
of television fees and endorsements.

As we discussed at the Grove, I have agreed to
chair a steering committee of leading Americans
to help bring the World Cup to America. Steve
Ross, who used to own the Cosmos soccer club,
and Drew Lewis have agreed to serve as Vice
Chairmen. Lou Gerstner and Bill Simon have
already agreed to serve.

TWENTY-SIXTH FLOOR · 350 PARK AVENUE · NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022 · (212) 759-7919

NOV 30 1987

MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS
JERUSALEM

משרד החוץ
ירושלים

Jerusalem, November 15, 1987

Dr. Henry Kissinger
350 Park Avenue
New York, N.Y. 10022

Dear Henry,

At the outset I wish to thank you, once again, for the
delicious breakfast conversation. I conveyed to Shimon your thoughts
concerning the proposed INF agreement and the possible extension of the
ABM treaty, as well as your reaction to the more intimate elaboration of
Shimon's own strategy concerning American commitments to Israel in the
context of the proposed mechanism for negotiations.

Most importantly, however, Shimon was delighted to learn that
you are able to accept his invitation and is very much looking forward
to hosting you here.

I have already informed Simcha of your scheduled visit (as well
as your warm regards). Obviously, he would very much like to host you
and is wondering whether a dinner on the evening of your arrival will be
too much given your flight schedule. In addition, I would like to
suggest that we arrange for you meetings with Messrs. Shamir and Rabin,
as well as a senior IDF intelligence briefing.

Please advise me if the above is agreeable, and of any other
meetings and/or visits you may wish to have.

Finally, as Shimon plans to stop in New York (on his way to
Brazil) for the weekend of December 11-13th, will it be possible for you
to visit with him some time on Saturday?

I look forward to seeing you in New York and greeting you in
Jerusalem.