European even interested 'en / or if ANY possible movement
in Europe really bothered 'en. He though a moment or
so and said" N...o ".

That was 1910. "He is a cousin of my grandmother
and wasn't pitching me a tale. N.Y. simply wasn't interested.

You may say that's all changed by now / but I cant honestly
believe it. Western mines had been drawing British capital
for half a century, or more/ and catching London suckers.

Roosevelt now has the banks by the short hairs/ but
the country is do "dumb" that Swoke and co/ might have
stolen it. Big industrials ( vide a note in last New York)

Econ/ education so deficient that Swoke wd/ have taken the place
of the last god damn Myer and Federal Credit board/

Re/ Douglas by installments.

In the sense those words convey to me/// yes,
or local pubk.
Certainly there must be CONTROL (national CONTROL) before
you can have Doug.

But (an not sure Orage wd/ agree )... I don't see need of
waiting till you know how much Doug/ div/ CAN be allocated

The premier pas qui coute. Obviously Eng/ or Am/ can
pay NOW a quid a week or 5 dollars a week. ONCE
the system started, plenty of time to figger out
the decimals.

Roose/ committed to statement that " MORE PURCHASING POWER is needed. "

really the ONLY step now needed/ the only decision is
(as I am printing )
//II/ as in fact I did manage to print
in a letter to that god damn McCormick gun selling gun
touting paper on the 15th. inst.

Chicago Tribune Paris.

" impartial dividend, payable in jeton money, and not subject to the whins of bureaucracy or special favours to anyone ". 

One, whether the hand out goes per capita/ or to
special god damn gangs ( if you/ a pious man, take my
cursing in the strict theological sense ).

One trouble is that the s.o.b Farley ( post master gen/ seems to have sold short in private aviation, before revocation of contracts. ..

that kind of merrrrdre messes up things.

Hull is mental deficient ( unless the trib. misquotes him ).

Anyhow, the successor of Colby ( Wilson's last sec/of state)
is in the true tradition by being a half/wit, a deficient.

of the administration shd/ get rid of ull nd harley

heights.

Your Promies to Pay/ and my ABC seem to me to take some
count of popular ingorance.

I am willing to let you perform a vorenoff of Christianity
if you use the Ta Rio/ I must have my translation reprinted.
But will root round and see if I can find a copy to
send you , in the interim.

At any rate NO CHRISTIANITY is worth a hoot UNLESS
the Christian is willing to carry it into ECONOMICS

will that formula suit you.

Dante did carry his 1/2% religion via his ethics into
discrimination of
ECONOMIC right and wrong.

If you want to reestab/ Xtianity, it must take up that
pick and shovel AGAIN. Otherwise it is merely an afternoon
tea diversion for aesthetes.

///

Again you worry me with " land and money "/// given the
publ/ controll of paper, the land and everything else falls
into place. Your city millions dont want LAND and
cant use it.

I am convinced that nothing but Orage's religion has kept him
going. I mean the MOTIVE power..his motive power...

but I hope

To
As a good medico, I suppose this sounds rather like removing
an appendix with a neat axe ?

( Before I forget it/ there was a rev/ of yr/ *promise to Pay, in
Trib. a couple of days ago/ I will send it to you in a day or
so/ )

2.
My point re/ religion, wasn't simply being *against* money,
but mediaeval catholic DISCRIMINATION between parasitic usury
and sharing. ( the latter permitted ).

I am hung up for want of my Jefferson and/or
Mussolini, I mean its not being printed.

However Muss' recent definition of the state as
"the spirit of the people" seems to back up what I wrote
a year ago/ and his remark on a house per family
(although he put it a long way off ) has the element of
distribution very much at the root,

I have always thought "liberalism" a ........ .... etc. LESS,

1. Re/ Kung /// "reason" hardly that of the french 18th
t century, as usually understood. Do give the think his
, he calls it " the luminous principle of reason
h we have received from the sky" .

Eliot has made a very silly remark on my Confucianism /

China ( north China ) Kung , at absolute at antipodes of all
that blast Hindoo cobwebs/ism.

direction

The whole attitude of Kung " bettering ones own person "
FOR purpose of EXAMINATING order , not the person being
autotelic objective.

//
I don't see any contradiction between Kung's Anschauung, and
any respectable form of Christianity / or any mutual exclusion
of one from the other.

All that I am out against is
a ( if you like ) pseudo/ Xtianity that makes the gran'
rifuto and WHOLET WONT function between good and evil
in question of life and death ( i;e; economics )

// to leap to a distant part of the discussion )

Mussolinu is offering the heroism in place of avarice and
personal advantage , has probably taken a line you wd/ commend.
He is out against the homo economicus.

I don't know that I grasp yr/ idea about men being unwilling to depart
from a rational basis...

( we again fall into ambiguity of language )
Had I ever found men ON a rational basis...etc...

( this is jeu de mots... )

Kung didn't ( as I see it ) reject the unmovable , he refused to
discuss it/ or to TEACH what he didn't know

I am willing to agree with you on "worship" or call it
an attitude of reverence. I shall never deny that an honest
man ed/ evolve an honest religion on Xtn/ basis/

My contention is that the Church is resigned/ that Xtianity
of
are that it offers organized bureucracies worthy of small respect

Eriugina's remark "authority comes from right reason"

doesn't seen to me to rule out the Unknown/ it rules out

the Gott mit Uns/ the use of the Unknown as leverage toward

a particular (unjustified and often unjust objective)

take this ad interim//

I 'll report on the preface and Book I. proofs/ later.

Trib/ reviewer probably can't say more. he has given you space.

There seems to me no doubt of the profundity of his

intuition of it/ and certainly he isolated the principle, and
made it basis of a system// IN VIOLENT rebellion against the
bestial savagery of the Jews, and the utterly damnable and
sadistic and altogether loathsome concept of JV JHV, daddy

slap/em/with/slab etc. concentration of all the most objectionable
characteristics of barbarian mind and character.

AND in any case I wasn't and am not attacking root good
of Xtianity, but objection to the exploitation of it by
a contemptible bureaucracy (Bish/ of London, and all the
rest of the spongers and exploiters).

‡ said " xtianity had resigned " , not that it had
never half office.

Swinburne's ballad of life, seems to me to contain admission
of purification and renewal in nature...

which OUGHT to inhere in Christianity
but which the neo/pagan can only proclaim by objecting
to, let us say, Eliot's black superstition.

the church

St Hilaire of Poitiers is good. St Peter's in Rome might
Just as well have been constructed for the Vienna opera.

///

All general terms are a quick/sand. Fenollosa's essay is
out of print, but my ABC of Reading is in press. that point
will have to wait for Assrs. Routledge to git on wiff de job.

Say that St Hilaire/ the Duomo of Modena are good/ St Peters
is the 30 pieces of silver/

The rare real work of the
renaissance/ Rimini, Sta Maria dei Miracoli are faith in the
returning life/gods.

The gotic had traces of fear, sadism. You are preaching
Christ as a life god.

which is, from my point of view
eminently orthodox

1;e; as it shd/ be.

I see one young american rebel is objecting to " chthonic
rejection of reason ".

and I am with him to this extent, I mean
against yr/ added note on p/ 25.

Mediaeval contemplation was directed toward God or the Divine
and that I think an excellent way of spending one's time
(leisure civilization coming )

The ecclesiastical bureaucracy is not only corrupt / vilely
sunk in sloth and economic dishonesty, and abrogation of
critical faculty re/ the gombeen man/

any theology.
of Dante's wd/

cogitation // though flits aimlessly about the object.

Meditation // thought circles about the object in orderly fashion.

contemplation // the thought becomes one with the object,
enders it.

BUT they don't even know

Contemplation of Richard St Victor's God or
ameliorate 'em a LOT.

(Benjamin Minor, sive de Contemplatio
R. St V.)

To repeat// Every mediaeval cathedral/ a victory over the
gombeen man.

Lion's mouth in Verona inscribed " This slit is for denumerations
of insurers and of unjust usurious contracts ".

Will prob/ enc/ Trib/ notice of yr/ book. I suggest you have
the rest of yr/ works sent to Root. It all helps circulation.

yours

This note ever more unsewn than the others/ being what I had left
out of them.

18 Oct.

anno XII

My Dear Sir, Air Wilson

For God's sake get hold of your
neighbor F.S.Flinnt, II (Eleven) Auckland Crescent, N.W.3
and find out whether one she/ STOP
his publishing a newspaper next.

Flinnt writes me that Flint has got what he (Flint) thinks is a REDEMPTION of Douglas and almost everything else.
IN MIDDLE H. ALGEBRA,

Flint was NOT a trained mathematician
when I know him. Nor is he, says the algebra in O.K.
but the Flinto/econow wa/ he just the same without it.

AT THE END OF when what we appallingly need is an ACCORD
on a few fundamentals,

the stowage of hell might gain any
amount of time, if there is another tangle of net threads,
down under our feet.

IF FLINT has elaborated some minor rectification
of Doug/; more power to his elbow, and I will
work to get Doug/ to correct an error/

But I am genuinely alarmed at the thought of
more UNLEGACYSSARY confusion.

II.

I doubt if the Duke's Milan speech was fairly presented in
England. He buried scarcity economics. THAT IS DONT.

40.a. Frognal Lane

Hampstead, N.W.3.

13 Dec. 1935.

Dear Mr. Pound,

I think it is very decent of you to write to me as you have done. I am going to answer you in the same spirit because I have a great respect for you, and for your poems a great use.

You have not yet faced, without any preconceived ideas, the real crux of this business. _This crux is debt._ Debt to-day has been baptised with a new name - Credit - and the new name has deceived you.

Consequently you believe in "social credit", that is to say debt administered by Government instead of private individuals.

A debt system of money _cannot work at all_ unless there be _borrowers_, _and prosperous people do not borrow_.

Either, therefore, "social credit" is stupidity or a fraud. If it succeeds, and people become prosperous, borrowing will cease and the system will break down; if the system does not break down there can be no prosperity because in that event, borrowing will still be going on.

Again, Social Creditors calmly announce that they propose to issue money against the "entire wealth" of the nation - public parks and light houses specifically included.

This shows that they know nothing about the nature or function of money.

2.

Neither public parks nor light houses nor the furniture in your house *are* for sale. It follows that if money is issued against them it will be used, not to buy them (they are not for sale), but to buy such goods as are actually on the market. The prices of these goods on sale will immediately rise and there will be a gross inflation in spite of the "just price". These are my reasons for rejecting social credit and I have rejected it absolutely and finally. I will have nothing to do with debt (*alias* credit) in any shape or form.

The power of the money-lender resides neither in gold nor silver, but solely in debt because debt allows him to change the *relationship* between debt and price. Prices matter nothing; debts matter nothing. But the relationship between the two is vital.

If I borrow £100. *and retain my income* I can pay my debt. But if, in the meanwhile, my income (i.e. the price I get for my goods or services) *falls, then I become the slave of my creditor*.

If my creditor possesses the power to reduce my income he possesses the power to hold me in slavery.

No debt (*alias* credit) system can exist unless those in control of it possess the power to reduce (or raise) prices. For, in the absence of that power, all capable persons will get out of debt and keep out of debt, and there will be no borrowers.

Price is the relationship between the quantity of goods *on the markets* and the quantity of money *on the markets*. It is therefore a

3.

perfect indicator. If prices rise there is too much money; if prices fall there is too little money on the market. The remedy, in each case, is to change the quantity of money so that rise or fall is corrected.

The debt system is placed under the iron necessity of preventing anyone from maintaining a stable level of prices. To be able to keep prices stable is to have defeated debt (alias credit).

When, therefore, he declared for a stable level of prices, i.e. "the commodity dollar", Mr. Roosevelt challenged the whole power of @ money. The whole power of money has, during three years, been mobilised against him.

You have overlooked this obvious fact because your mind is obsessed by the word credit (alias debt) and because, in consequence, you have formed in your mind a picture of a "national credit" which, in fact, has no relationship of any kind to the "credit" bankers deal in.

Bankers have not stolen the national credit, they have not exploited it, they care nothing about it. What they are interested in is the national wealth. Bankers give credit (alias debt) in exchange for wealth.

Do, therefore, get a clear idea of the meaning of these words.

Mr. Roosevelt @ rejected social credit for the same reason That I have rejected it. Because it is debt with a pretty name.

He began, innocently I think, by supposing that the world's financiers wanted to find a way out of the slump. He found by experience that what he was up against was a system which cannot live without borrowers, i.e. debtors, and which, therefore, must possess as its own absolute right

4.

the power to issue _all_ money. He found, further, that this system knows of only one way of protecting itself when attacked — namely to withdraw and destroy money, i.e. to cancel debt and so reduce prices.

Why not, then, have issued more money?

The answer is that such issue of money implies victory over the debt system. Until you have won your victory you cannot issue money seeing that the right to issue is the right for which you are fighting.

Suppose that Mr. Roosevelt, in accordance with the advice of yourself and others, had made an issue of "green backs", and distributed them to the poor of America. These notes would have been used to buy food and clothes and the prices of food and clothes would have risen. Meanwhile the "green backs" would have been paid to merchants who would have taken them to their banks.

Assume, further, that Mr. Roosevelt had seized all the banks — or if you prefer leave out that assumption. It makes no difference. The rise in prices would have caused an immediate and brisk speculative demand for loans in order (1) to gamble in commodities (2) to gamble on the stock exchange (3) to gamble by creating new factories and other capital goods. Banks, whether private or national, would have lent freely and prices would have gone on rising until a point was reached at which either a new issue of "green backs" must be made or the boom brought to an end. The poor, in face of the rise in prices, would have demanded more "green backs", so would all the speculators. If the government had yielded a new boom and a larger one would have developed and this must

5.

have continued until the purchasing power of the dollar was wholly
destroyed. And why? Because there would have been an issue of money
in excess of the goods available. How happy the masters of money would
have been if they still hope for such a result - as witness the coming
demand for "Veteran's Bonus".

I beg you to notice that this is the ordinary method by which
the debt system engineers a "recovery" and that the end is always the
same - namely, either a destruction of the currency (French assignats
and German marks) or collapse of the boom in order that the currency
may be saved from destruction.

You must, sir, recognise that, when the debt (alias credit) system
is in good working order it proceeds always by small inflations and
small slumps. Prices are allowed to rise a little and then, when people
begin to pay off their debts and get prosperous, are caused to fall
again so that the supply of debtors may be refreshed. If the process
gets out of hand - as would occur if the debt (alias credit) system
were nationalized or socialized or otherwise bent to apparently public
uses - the rise of prices would be fanned by good-hearted enthusiasts
until a point was reached at which these people would either loose their
nerve or their heads. In the former case they would begin to deflate
violently and so would cause an "almightily crash" in the latter they
would go on fanning the boom until their money had lost the whole of its
value. This is what happens when the debt (alias credit) system is

6.

"adapted to national uses".

Happily Mr. Roosevelt is the greatest man whom the world has seen for at least a century. He saw the snare and avoided it. Instead of rhetoric about "giving the people money" and so on, he began, very quietly, to borrow money himself, paying for it with his own I.O.Us. and putting it into circulation modestly, as public works schemes. At the same time he unbalanced the American Budget.

You remember how the Puritans who "hate debt" and fear unbalanced budgets began to howl. Why borrow? Why not nationalize credit (alias debt) and so on?

Mr. Roosevelt's borrowings, however, did their work. They upset a system the essence of which is its automatic character. Normally, when people get prosperous and pay back their debts, deflation follows because the act of repaying a debt takes money off the markets.

But Mr. Roosevelt went on borrowing. He borrowed all the money which had been paid back by prosperous folk. He borrowed and borrowed and borrowed and borrowed, until, at last he was practically the only debtor of the financial system. For his borrowing had maintained the price levels, and all the other debtors, in consequence, had got out of debt.

And then he called to him the leaders of finance and thus, perhaps, addressed them:

"Gentlemen, behind your loans to-day, for the most part, my I.O.Us. These are nothing else. I now propose to pay you, not five per cent on these loans, but one and three-eights per cent."

7.

The Bankers. "Never"

Mr. R. "What will you do Gentlemen, if I begin to sell my
I.O.Us. on the market."

The Bankers. "We will sell them too."

Mr. R. "Really. Then they will fall in value and your only
asset will be hopelessly 'frozen' so that a run on you
by your customers is bound to occur."

The Bankers. (Horror stricken) "We will buy your new I.O.Us."

Mr. Roosevelt has now converted his debt from a five to six per cent basis to a one and three-eights - two per cent basis. And no Bank in U.S.A. is earning the keep of its clerks. The day is therefore close at hand when the banks will be forced to ask Mr. Roosevelt to guarantee their deposits, i.e. to turn their promises to pay into legal tender. He will do so in condition, of course, that his I.O.Us. are returned to him. America will have paid off her national debt with paper. And since her citizens will be out of debt and will have no need to barrow, the debt (alias credit) system will have ceased to function. All that will now be necessary will be to maintain the price-level by putting out new money as required or, vice versa, withdrawing money by taxation or some other device.

Mr. Roosevelt's system (which is as old as Christendom) filled London with terror. London met him by a policy designed to involve him in a runaway inflation i.e. to destroy the dollar.

A. By causing a Wall St. boom.

8.

B. By causing a boom in the heavy industries.

It was necessary, to this end, to pump money into America in order to "prime the pump."

It was, further, necessary to keep the English prices down seeing that, had English prices risen, the mechanism of inflation for U.S.A. must have broken down.

That mechanism consisted in raising the £-price of gold by buying the metal forward on the London market. This exerted a terrible pressure on the gold bloc (France, Italy, Germany, Switzerland, Belgium, Holland, Poland etc.) and made it probable that these countries would, because they must, devalue their currencies. Hence flights of money to U.S. were caused and, at the same time, buying-power in Europe (and also in the Far East through silver) was reduced. The goods thus flung on the markets (owing to reduced buying-power) came to London and prevented a rise of English prices. The flights of money to America were invested in Wall St..

Suppose the gold bloc had devalued. Then the price of gold in London would have been bought up once more from say 140/- an ounce to 160/- or 130/- or 220/-. The gold bloc would thus have been put through the hoop a second and a third and a fourth time until, at last, fear of revolution in Europe would have compelled statesmen to link their currencies to the £ in a fixed relationship.

Thereafter London would have possessed an absolute

9.

control of the European as well as of the British Empire (Sterling area) price-level.

And meanwhile such masses of money would have reached Wall St. as to have set the great boom going.

It was, therefore, obviously Mr. Roosevelt's business to prevent the fall of the gold bloc until such time as London's power to buy up the £-price of gold had been destroyed. For if the gold bloc stood firm the flow of money to U.S. would be reduced and the English price-level, gradually, raised by the gradual rise in prosperity in U.S. as the debt(alias credit) system was liquidated.

Whatever you may think about Mr. Morgenthau he has faithfully pursued the policy of his master.

M. Laval is, of course, a wealthy Frenchman of peasant stock whose last idea on earth is, probably, currency reform. But M. Laval like all Frenchmen, believes in Gold and is afraid of Germany. He saw, long ago, that London wanted to force France into the sterling area and he believes that London has rearned Germany. Hence he was determined to cling to gold at all costs until London was forced to promise not to raise further her gold price i.e. was forced to stabilise. This, for wholly different reasons, was also the policy of the Bank of France where as you say, the Regents are determined to maintain their system at all costs. Hence the association Laval-Morgenthau-Regents.

Why did the Bank of England lend its support? Because, in April

10.

and May, there was a sharp upward movement of English prices caused by the sudden fear of a European war which followed Mr. Ramsay Mac Donald's rebuke to Herr. Hitler and Herr. Hitler's consequent refusal to see Sir John Simon. France as you know called up recruits and Herr. Hitler reintroduced conscription. This panic ended at Stresa. But the rise of prices was so sharp that the franc had to "peg" the franc i.e. ship gold to Paris in exchange for francs and sell these francs against pounds, thus reducing the price of gold (i.e. the franc -f exchange). This is what M. Tannery meant when he talked about the "help" from London. The Bank of England was, further, compelled to shut the London bullion market against the International Bankers, and there had been no Wall St. boom - thanks to Mr. Roosevelt.

Now Sir, that is the defeat of debt. Because if London is forced to support the gold bloc on pain of famine-prices in England, London has lost the control of the price-level and with the power to cause a Wall St. boom.

My book ended there. Financial control had passed from London to Washington (June 6, 1935). But there remained one desperate hope - namely the playing of politics as a means of recovering financial power. Politics have never yet, in history, beaten finance. But the chance had to be taken. It was argued that if the League of Nations opposed Signor Mussolini's plans in Abyssinia, a panic must occur in Paris and else where resulting in a huge flight of capital to U.S.A. Since the franc is linked to the dollar by gold it was supposed that the

cc. 1 1

French would be forced to devalue or abandon gold for sterling. As it happened the Argentine wheat crop failed and English prices began, once more, to mount up. Once again it became necessary to "peg" the franc and London lost about £ 60,000,000 in gold to Paris (Sep. and Oct. 1935).

This caused the famous "lull" in the League crisis. During the lull English prices fell somewhat and the Communist - Croix de Feu crisis in France began. Coincidentally with it, London shipped £ 80,000,000 in gold to New York by selling francs against dollars - was passed in other words the whole of this export of English money across the franc-dollar exchange so as to cause an out flow of gold from Paris and thus "compel" M. Laval to devalue or, alternatively, to bring down his government. ( M. Laval is at heart a Fascist ). The gold was to have caused the longed for Wall St. boom .

M. Laval won. English prices began to rise again and the attempt to deflate China, and so get hold of the Australian wheat, failed. Consequently the "Paris Plan" - to the blank amazement of all honest Englishmen was adopted ( It had been supposed in England that the enthusiasm for the League was a genuine enthusiasm ). Not to have adopted it meant stabilizing the £ on gold i.e. on the dollar i.e. on Mr. Roosevelt's price index.

And this in fact will have to be done, Paris plan or no Paris plan. Mr. Roosevelt has won. A currency conference will be held. The gold bloc will devalue and so, automatically, go onto the dollar.

12.

Thus, all the world will come to Mr. Roosevelt's index, that is to say
to a stable level of prices and so to a complete use of all the resources
of God.

To their lively astonishment the Regents of the Bank of France
will now find themselves bereft of the power to lend - as will all
bankers all over the world ( for want of borrowers ).

I beg you, in the light of this long discourse, to reconsider.
Mr. Roosevelt is too big a man to be diverted from his aim by the
necessity of moving out prudently from an existing state of affairs
to a better state of affairs. He has achieved a new world in which all
will be free and the guides of which will be poets and artists and
not bankers.

If I were an American I should know no end to the pride I should feel in the knowledge that this king among men was my fellow countryman.

No, boss, you got me all wrong. You are
Are arguing with someone else/ and I dont think you have
checked up on the individual SLOP and idiocy in Frankie's
cabinet. I have been actively corresponding. I KNOW the
level of idiocy whereby F/D/R/ is surrounded.

I was DEELIGHTED when he hung up the banks on a little
bitt of HHHEHH thread and left 'em hanging there.

I am not contradicting THAT.
BUT the administration stalls and stalls/

XI want money picture equal to Loeb chart of PRODUCTION
stream for stream/

Roosevelt has CEASED TO WANT the good
of the people/ he is out to maintain the caste system whereby
he had led a privileged life.

HE will NOT face questions.
(and of course the reaction and greed set against any honest
govt. is enormous, I dont underestimate what he is up against
But the greatest DEVIL in his path is INSIDE him.)

Your nearest shot is the diagram on unbalanced budget/

DOLE is INFANY/ Townsend dodges the issue.

The increment of association exists/ and is an increment of
That dont require issuing green backs beyond the goods rea/
to eat and wear.

Roosevelt is not the least anxious to feed the hu
usa/ and all this public works is FORK.

well; I admit that is a unproved assertion

NOTHIN<sub>g</sub> is being done to get the goods from
where they are to the people that need the <sub>g</sub>. The Loeb
chart proves they are available.

Roosevelt takes up MOST of
the infamies tried out in England and proved false.

The starvers have by the infamy of Geneva /

1. restriction of consumption

2. rise in price of petrol

3. gun sales by Mitsui to profit of DeWendel and friends.

What about Sam Hoare/ did he MEAN to give the show away/ P/78
of yr/ defeat Debt/ ??

Can he run straight now ?

I doubt if Laval has any concept of the Corporate state.
( You might as well call ME a fascist ! ; you prob. do
at any rate Laval and I must be different kinds.

England is the ONLY country where ANYONE ever was ass
enough to think the League anything but a fake/ a banker's
net, run by bank swine and the employees who want
employment, i;e; their jobs.

Orage ( by the way m was unceasing in his hate of the "eague
which never fooled him.

Excuse the apparent incoherence of these sentences, I have
answered yr/ letter as it runs.

I am NOT contradicting yr/ summary of positive ACTS
Roosevelt. Something gained. YES. But VICTORY, NO.
None of us can sleep for five minutes, the me'

which can not be reached by mere impovrishment of the
few people still getting 1800 dollars a year.

The reduction of
all america to a labour army/ with the nastiest type
of sadist at the head of all govt. dept.

REVOLTING avdnace of real slavers under nude eel; may have
escaped you.

I was born and lived in that semiInferon.

The pedagogic type now loosed on defenseless men on "relief
work" wd/ deligth a Torquemada.

all the slop and slosh of t
the vilest socialism turned loose. ( the picture HAS another
side).

I cant make out where you get your DETAIL, your
HUMAN facts inHHHHHH whereon a true picture must be founded.

The infamy of Geneva/ the attempt to starve Italy/ that you see,
I believe.

Try it this way: what do you PROPOSE for England ? Laisser
faire ?

Adequate monetization ? Inadequate monetization ?

salvation from the American clouds ?

I am not engaged in selling a man's theory IF it is wrong,
I want the TRUE answer,

Dutchart and young Mark think HARD. Will you meet 'em ?
Can I send 'em to see you.

The effort to MAKE WAR and get it into Europe has been tremendous
and unsleeping. We are not YET out of danger. THE
War wd. conceal truth another 20 years. Sanctions are condemned
because they give debt an alibi,

Do you meet Hoare ? someone OUGHT to.

I know N/Y is lousy with agent of London insurers; but
still ...

There is an enormous amount left UNDONE.

Bankhead's bill

cd/ have been moderated. The complete suppression of that
line of education is sheer WASTE of TIME.

I come back to the point that a big game, with the
President playing against bankers, may be all over the
heads of the people and leve the distribution IN DEATIL
untouched.

The e is a HUMAN element/ food / clothes/
down under and WHERE IT MATTERS.

Good god/ I grew up in that country, and know the Y.M.C.A.
type of mind/ the dung of Calvin. the nastiest type of
nose-blowwing nursemaids.

It is UNCLEAN to keep a bitch like Perkins round the Capital.

something MUST be wrong with a man who keeps THAT in
his entourage.

NO It is NO friendship to enco rage a man in his vices.

Good Lord; I don my do know my compatriots, and the awful
SOFTNESS ...

What about England? any signs of cleanliness in the HOME ?

ad interim.

wish we cd/ go at viva voce.

"IN PLAIN ENGLISH"

McNAIR WILSON'S NEWS-LETTER

Author of Doctors' Progress, Napoleon, The Portrait of a King, Monarchy or Money Power, Promise to Pay, The Beloved Physician, etc.

The Newsletter is delivered on Friday of each week.

Subscriptions, post free, to any address in the world:

Year ... 12/6
Half-year ... 6/3
Quarter ... 3/2

All communications to be addressed to McNair Wilson, 40a, Frognal Lane, Hampstead, N.W.3. Telephone Hampstead 5534.

Published by McNair Wilson, 40a, Frognal Lane, N.W.3.

27 March 1989

Dear Mr Pound,

I fear I owe you some letters and I thank you for the consideration you have shown me. I fear too that you knew your

Koosevelt better than I did and though I can still find little to complain of in his price-level my approval now emphatically ends there.

I cannot abide the jargon of masonry or the bilge about democracy.

I have tried to reach the public in many ways; this is the latest.

I am venturing to send you some copies not with the idea of telling you anything but merely to express current feeling. What a really great

poet you are.

Yours Sincerely,

Private, Confidential and World Copyright

# “IN PLAIN ENGLISH”

## McNAIR WILSON'S NEWS-LETTER

Author of Doctors Progress, Napoleon, The Portrait of a King, Monarchy or Money Power, Promise to Pay, The Beloved Physician, etc.

Telephone:
HAM. 5534

40a, FROGNAL LANE,
HAMPSTEAD, N.W. 3

Thursday, August 10th, 1939

No. 45

My dear Reader,

WE know now that this country will not be committed in the Far East if the Prime Minister can help it. And we know also that the man who rescued Spain from Bolshevism is still the master of that country.

We are in a position, therefore, to measure with some degree of accuracy the weight of British influence in Central Europe and hence to arrive at conclusions, however tentative, about the prospects of peace in that troubled area. British influence is being exerted to strengthen the Polish Government against the Red elements in Poland. In order to weaken British influence the Reds have tried to engage this country in a quarrel with Japan and at the same time to rekindle the Spanish Civil War. They have failed in both these enterprises. They have failed, therefore, to weaken the Polish Government.

That is the reason why the Danzig crisis is less acute now than it was a fortnight ago. It is the reason also why Moscow has begun to display a more accommodating spirit. For in spite of all their fine words about the prowess of the Red Army, the Bolsheviks are well aware of the difficulties of a war on two fronts. If Britain will not oblige them by fighting Japan, their policy must needs be directed towards appeasement in the West.

### DIPLOMATIC DEFEAT.

MOSCOW, in other words, is beginning to think that she may be compelled, at long last, to give the guarantees to Poland and Rumania for which Britain asked four months ago and so to abandon her hope of coming to the help of the Polish and Rumanian Reds. But she is, nevertheless, reluctant to accept so crushing a diplomatic defeat and is turning as usual to her friends in America. If Great Britain could be forced, or shamed, by the United States to go to war with Japan, Moscow might still continue her fishing in the troubled Central European waters.

The return of Mr. Wm. Strang from Moscow must be viewed in the light of these considerations. His return was announced on the morrow of Mr. Chamberlain's statement of British policy in the Far East and coincided with the announcement of General Franco's victory over his enemies in Spain. It has been followed by rumours that the Polish Government is to be invited to take part in the Staff Talks between France and Britain and Russia. The suggestion that Russia feels herself in an insecure position is difficult to resist.

"IN PLAIN ENGLISH"

RED LIGHT IN AMERICA.

ON the other hand it is obvious that a time must come when the peoples exploited by Bolshevism will turn against their oppressors. There are some signs, as I have already pointed out, that time is approaching in the United States. Congress has lately been in open revolt against the Administration. It has defeated the attempt to change the neutrality laws and it has refused some of the money asked for relief purposes.

But such refusal carries with it new dangers about which few Americans seem to possess understanding. It took all the courage and strength and leadership of M. Daladier to change the forty-hour week in France and so to make it possible for industrialists in that country to carry on their businesses. Who in America is strong enough to tackle the Labour Unions and so restore conditions in which American industry and business can possibly be carried on?

Here again there is a technique of ruin which deserves the close attention of students of existing conditions. The technique is this: first to raise wages and shorten hours of work so that private enterprise is made impossible; then to begin relief works on the largest scale and to charge these to the account of the taxpayer, i.e. the leaders of industry. The relief works will not "prime the pump" for the good reason that the pump has already been put out of action by the impossibly high wages and short hours. But the relief works will lay the foundations of the Bolshevist State and when any attempt is made to reduce them and to get private industry going once more, violent resistance may be expected. Mr. Roosevelt is no M. Daladier. Nor is it at all certain that he has any sympathy with the ideas of the French Prime Minister. He may, indeed, put himself at the head of the "workers" in their resistance to the "malefactors of great wealth." If he does America will split in two and forces will be let loose which will make short work of "democracy" — excluding the Russian kind — and which will present the world with either a Red or a Fascist America. It is just possible that this course of events may be prevented. But the idea that America will be allowed to abandon gold money while any tittle of power or influence remains to the Owners of Gold is too ridiculous to be entertained.

Yours Sincerely,

R. McNAIR WILSON.

"The Newsletter" is delivered on Friday of each week. Subscriptions post free, to any address in the world: Year 12/6, Half-year 6/3, Quarter 3/2, Single Copies 3d. Please help to make this newsletter known and so to combat the forces which are intent upon the ruin of England. All communications to be addressed to McNair Wilson, 40a, Frognal Lane, Hampstead, N.W.3. Telephone Hampstead 5534.

Published by McNair Wilson, 40a, Frognal Lane, N.W.3, and Printed by Albert Clark & Co., Ltd., Waterloo Road N.W.2.

5 Ag

39

Yes BUTTT : My Dear McN/W

Surely all this slobbering over the
bloody russian savages is due to pressure from GOLD/

Russia started by damned N.Y. yidds/ NOTHING in
common between France, England and Russia but GOLD/

//

I think the idea of dominions joining the U.S. is an
hallucination, UNTHINKABLE in the U.S.A.

the kind of thing you
contract out of books, and island theorists.

Naturally Chamb/ wouldn't "go fascist", but some end
to the continual crap about Palazar not being fascist/ some end
to the loan sharks flying kitrs.

ANYhow; time for YOU to start educating YOUR ambience
and wearing down the opposition to Mosley which is

EITHER foul corruption or dense ignorance.

have you read Yeats Brown's European Jungle/ an advance for
him.

Also the Fucha' Danzig pamphlet, very calm.

And I think Roosensteins kikes are NOT having America
all their own way/ What about Wm/ Wiseman ??

Baruch has said " no more big jews out in front "

As I am openly anti. Roosensetinvelt, YOU who have in
the past spoken well of the blighter COULD very usefully
moralize over his UNWILL to go straight re/ money.

" Stubborn as a murle, sir, got the eastern view about money
as a good ole senator said to me in
Washington in May.

What's biting Hollis ?? I forget whether yo
know him.

I dont think it is whitechappel that is yelling for
pact with Rhussian ghouls/ but GOLD and your goddamn bank
swine.

Cockburn's rag is HHHHH howling over some sane
measures for agreement with Germany. raw materials, free ports
instead of usury.

Times a day or so ago on 30 milliyun/ to
Poles, Turks, Greeks/ vurry vaif.

tax of how much on pore bdy/
poles etc/ to be spent at Vickers, at two quid for each qu
worth of guns.

While bartering rubber for american ( anti kike ) cotton.

Only Xtn/ feasts with any vitality, based on
EUROPEAN religion/ Noche di san Juan/ 'Pale fire/ easter
and Adonis. Ligo in Lithuania. etc./ Winter solstice.

Dear McN W/

Sorry not to have known of yr. News letter soone
My wife will subscribe as soon as she gets to England
(in tendays or so). I am leaving on a voyage of exploration
and cd/nt get the copies much before I see her, or at any
rate get the wd/ get lost.

I wish you wd/ exchange with John Drummond.

I wish you wd/ send the letter to General Fuller, if you
don't do so already.

I also wish you cd/ have heard Mosley's speech in Lewisham.
He has gone up/ and I believe the prejudice against him is
against an EARLIER O/M/ not the present one.

I think he is the rallying point. I didn't get
any further north than Wangham place; during burdened weeks in
London. I should have got to Frognal; but sheer human
strength and time limit prevented it.
& Various people came to me.

I think you wd/ reach more readers in Mosley's press
than in scattered leaflet. or in the National Citizen/
You English must unite. I mean the those of you who want
results.

I trust you will also hear from a man who is organizing
a non party symposium against the fake pacifists.

The paragraph on Holden is useful ( No 23 P.23 )

I try to help you by keeping DOWN to minimum space and you
then let in this smoke pusher on my undefended side/

I shd/ refuse ALL letter that dont offer an AMELIORATION
of definitions used/

If the critic cant ADD/ if he cant
clarify

then he is a waste of space.

Aristotle is UNSatisfactory/ that is no reason for rejecting
what he is RIGHT about.

Chep Cheap minds go off on the minor detail.

This is merely to say/ go ahead with the letter I sent you.

I dont consider the one in todays issue worth notice in print.
nor do I think you have added to the value of the N.E.W. by pri

printing it. A post card telling the b biggar to send in
a BETTER definition wd/ have served.

To McNair Wilson

23 Feb 00

Dear W.

If english publishers weren't such pig headed apes
pig headed apes, they wd' send REVIEW copies of books to people
likely to review them/ they wd. sell more books, and in the
case of books containing anything save crap or Aster's pipple
the wd/ also enlighten sooner.

These pious thoughts due to belated arrival of yr/ Mind of
Napoleon.

up to p/ 56, I cant see that yr' eye is single.
You ride a theory/

If Louis hadn't been an ass about money, or if the wheeze
had been understood by any honest man near the throne...

why wdn't that have done the business ? Seems to me you
weaken yr/ damn good case, by trying to say TWO things
at once. //

Thanks by the way for the kind word on p. xii.

I continue to find Christianity more and more EVIL/

completely unethical in that it preaches toe putting off/ the
slithering away from immediate respinsibility on the pie in the
sky plea/ or the manichaean trend that nothing here matters
and that no god damned prelate ever need exercise immediate
honesty.

Been reading some mediaeval theology/ all the trend to STOP
honest thought and try to hitch the facts onto a text

allegedly inspired. HHHHH Fundamental semitic dishonesty.

No sense of hierarchy/ no gradations. Seems to me the
sell out to usury wd/ have been just as bad whatever rotten
' anti-philesophy underlay it.

By the way/ do you ever see fatty tells ? See ANY chance of
getting him to think with ANY precision ? returning to yr/ book.

Louis did not attack his own IGNORANCE. ergo unfit to rule.

You are fairly wild on P.61.

got to P/ 105/ some of it damn fine/ BUT you slip up
by divided view/ eye on two or more things at once.

BROADLEY HOUSE
SWAY
HAMPSHIRE.

17 March 1953

Dear Mr. Pound

I have just got your letter.

As it happened, the day after it arrived I was asked by Dennis Goacher of the *European* to write 5,000 words for that new journal, with your economic studies as the "peg". I am most hopeful that you will allow me to preface what I write with the foreword which I now enclose. Please make any emendations you chose.

I hope I have put my point of view without any kind of unction (remember I am a Scot) or priggishness. I cut the enclosed from the last edition of the *Sunday Times* (March 15, 1953) as I thought it might interest you.

With kindest regards, I am

IRONSHILL LODGE

NEW FOREST

NEAR LYNDHURST

HAMPSHIRE

25 August 1956

Dear Ezra Pound

It was so kind of you to write to me again.
We sold our house (Broadley House) nearly a year
ago and have been living in hotels ever since; and so
everything has gone to confusion. Happily we have
now, at last, got another house into which we go
at the end of this month. The address is as above.

I have read the poems you sent to me and I wish
to thank you for your kindness. They are brave as well
as noble.

While removed from books, I wrote a play about
a man who was our son's brother officer in the
Coldstream Guard -- Major Carr Gomm. One day this
young man felt a change taking place in his outlook.
He was in touch with a body of Franciscans; he sold
all that he had and went to scrub out the houses of old
poor people. He continues to do this. There was
an article about him in one of the magazines. What
I have written has no direct connexion with him -- rather
he is the peg on which to hang ideas.

(2)

I'm afraid the play may strike you as silly; it
is certainly great presumption on my part to send it to
you. But I find myself wandering back into the
Middle Ages as, for me, the best haven in the storm.
We live here in William the Conqueror's hunting forest,
in a triangle the angles of which are Salisbury Cathedral
Winchester Cathedral and Christchurch Priory.

I have read Scott's life of Napoleon. He got
severely trounced for it because he likened Napoleon
to the Black Prince -- on account of Napoleon's
chivalrous behaviour to the garrison of Mantua. I think
Scott's life is a good one. Scott, whom nobody now
seems to read, was a kind and fair-minded man for whom
all Scotsmen have a warm feeling.

I have been trying to study the methods by which
the Mediaeval Church implemented its ban on usury. So
far as I can discover these were two -- namely,

(1) the Feudal System of land tenure, under which nobody could own land and, consequently, nobody could mortgage it and,

(2) the Royal mints. When minted silver (i.e. money) bought more goods than unminted silver (i.e. bullion) it paid to take your silver tea-pots to the mint and get them turned into money. Minted

(3)

mined silver bought more than unminted only WHEN THERE WAS TOO LITTLE OF IT IN CIRCULATION.

Thus money was maintained in correct quantity by the people themselves and not by King or Government.

So, for all practical purposes was unlintedable.

The modern idea is to control prices by manipulation of the quantity of money in circulation; the mediaeval idea was to allow prices to control the quantity of money. The Government held the ring. That was its sole function.

As you have insisted again and again, the sign and seal of sovereignty is the creation of money. The obverse of this seems to be the maintenance by the people of the law of supply and demand. If at any time there should be too much money in circulation, the people will quickly create more goods until prices stabilize themselves: if there should be too little money production will be curtailed correspondingly. Booms and slumps, in other words, are attempts to restore the equilibrium of markets which the banking systems have upset and so to restore honest, useful trading.

I believe that, so far as Europe was concerned, it was necessary to destroy the Mediaeval Church, and

(4)

then the national sovereignties, before money-lending
could be established in security. The Church was
destroyed by injecting into its body of doctrine
the idea of an unpayable debt -- a debt that cannot be
paid except by " the shedding of blood." God the
Father, bearing in His own person the penalties of the
exercise by His children of free will -- the privilege
and glory of fatherhood -- was transformed subtly into
god the usurer, incapable of exercising forgiveness
except on terms of vicarious liquidation of debt
in association with faith -- " credit " - in the
efficacy of such liquidation payment. Thus was accomplished
the effective "brain-washing" of Western Man.

Even science has been subjected to the process
of de-naturing in the interests of the usurer. We owe
surgery and immunology to the demonstration by Pasteur
and others that spontaneous generation does not occur
and that species are rigid. But the evolutionists
continue to suggest that the process of spontaneous
generation and of flux is the basis of
life on this earth. Thus is maintained the conception
of inorganic breeding, the counterpart of which is
the spawning by money of more money per cent, per annum.

IRONSHILL LODGE
NEW FOREST
NEAR ASHURST
SOUTHAMPTON

12 October 1956

Dear Ezra Pound,

Thank you very much for your great kindness in sending me your brilliant translation. I am reading and re-reading it. More and more one sees how true minds find truth with the certainty that an honest man of science finds " that which works. " Soddy, who died a week or two ago, and who, working with Rutherford, originated nuclear physics, and himself discovered "isotopes", heavy water and the rest, once, at my urgent invitation, was so good as to lecture on money. He told me that he had become interested in the subject after reading a book by Arthur Kitson. He had not at first believed what Kitson said and had, therefore, studied the matter for himself. He could see no light till:-

" One day it dawned on me that what I was studying was not economics but brigandage. "

I have again, recently, been reading your Cantos, 88 & 89. Though I do not know enough of American financial history to understand all the allusions, I can feel the truth.

"Pegging " national monies to gold or silver or to anything

2

else that can be monopolized, made scarce, and hired out
there is the whole story of Money's conquest of Man.
I have tried to put my ideas in very short form, and I am
sending you a copy herewith. Do with it what you choose,
and by all means make any use you care of anything I have
written to you.

I am sending also a book I wrote long ago, before I had
any knowledge that any money question existed. It was
republished recently, and I took the chance to write a
second preface. Later I was asked to write a life of
Madame de Stael, and it was while I was writing that book
that I began to learn. Her father, Necker, as you may
remember, financed the French Revolution so that France's
colonial empire might pass to Britain, or rather to London.
The GOLD had gone to London, and where the GOLD goes, the
empire must follow so that lending centre and borrowing
circumference may be politically united. When Spain had the
GOLD she had the empire; when the GOLD went to France the
empire followed. Amsterdam and London came next. And now
it is New York. Will the empire follow the GOLD to
America? This was the question I tried to state in
The New Wealth

Thank you so much for your great kindness about my play.

I work

I did, but you seem never to have heard of Kung fuTseu. Still don't see anything in yr/ king business that isn't basic in Kung, whereas King a particular implement. And you use term Xtianity as synonym for KALON kai AGATHON. After CHHH 1100 an. Augusto Dom. civic liberty pried out between Pope and rex.

Anselm plugging for central control / which is decided to be irrelevant and too remote. BUT Ans/ wanting a little ethics. and yr/ neighbor Bill Rufus for swag. Glad to find corporate state on p. 275. You don't say which Colonna. nor do you mention vocational representation. In fact the lousy pinks wd/ brand you totalitarian ?? ( just as unjustly as they attack ANY opposition to internat-usury. ) Even an honest king IGNORANT of how the crabline have brought in kahal system wd/ be in difficulties. Swabey had a note in recent Voice, on IGNORANCE of kahal SYSTEM. Dizzy imported it to england and Wilson Woodrow clamped it onto the U.S. where the assassination of Lincoln had CHHH facilitated its arrival.

Lack of contact between everyone you ever met and all my acquaintances ( rare exception, Kitson ) has NOT been an asset. Ever since my research on Cavalcanti, have observed the STEADY poisoning of clean thought by injections of JEW. Protests in time of Bede. Faustus even as rebutted by Augustine had a gleam, but Manicheans generally wrong. In fact three religions poisoned by the O. T. Atrophy of curiosity among most of my acquaintance. Boycott by your publishers of nearly all useful authors but yrself. Hv. yu any idea why Kitson failed to make you aware of DelMar ? valuable for facts, but NOT putting up defence vs/ kahal. Are you participating in ANY drive to get basic education into england by ANY channel ? " half dead at the top" Feats was all for yr/ feudal leading, but had Manuel ANY idea of monetary issue ? I doubt if Os. Sitwell will introduce these lively elements to Buckingham Palace PAIdeuma. What about Eyre/Spot, doing the needed Blackstone which TDH hasn't funds to offset. ( shd/ be from llth edtn, plus the American summary, forget exact date, 140 years ago, approx). And the whole Benton 30 years .

I suppose Orage had left England when you got round to $. ?? and CHDoug a scotch engineer lacking deference for Kitson which wd/ have been an asset. Incidentally the Republica di Salo printed Kit's summary of Bank Conspiracy in 'venice during the 600 days. IF they had left the Italian's that central section between the two armies , which was dangeled to diddle a few naive wops after Badoglio etc. bitched the Regime, one might have had at least an effective or active publishing machinery.

**DIRECTIO VOLUNTATIS,** I put the lable VOLITIONALIST on my econ/ efforts. accord from "encius, Dante, Agassiz, to CHD's " money is more an instrument of policy than a measure of exchange".

boycot of his name in so much of yr. ambience.
I can't recall any of ever recognizing my efforts in serious comment. BBC recenty did broadcast some of my Randolph or Benton cantas, but dont think they mentioned it in their papers. almost *late* died off during late usurers' festivity.

yr/" puritan" merely IHHHHHH one, and of the vilest judaic injections. Milton's horrible style, prots/ incapable of smelling the stink of decaying mind. descent , i.e. sinking of perception measured from Dant to Milt.

I had to get to Kung to find something neither poisoned by jew book, nor distorted and narrowed into attack on it.
Any mass of savage records, hoisted to word of God, wd/ be EE poisonous. Interpretation, using text as authority for something other than plain meaning of the words.

A LOY of yr/ thought wd/ be more comfortable in Confucian setting, than in farewell to wee free and the lousy liberals.

p. 276 / GOOD, I retract several phrases, and pray for more emphasis on such selection. Believe wop ventennio largely or wholly ignorant of Byzantine guilds, vid Canto 96/ Eparxikon Biblion. Haldane cf/ Leger: Moi, je suis fils d'une mere normande, suis aussi étranger que vous. in Paris 1922.

BLACKSTONE, as uncontaminated history. Green to non-specialist seemed honest up to 1696. even MacCauley says more re. finance. great jew drive here to wipe out Blackstone. Antoninus Pius' blacked out. A few phrases left in greek and lat/ possibly because copyists didn't realize what they reveal. Now starting

Pauvre Minette / IS there anything in English on Thiers that even hints at what he understood and how he got France on her feet again. ONE pp/ half way thru 2nd. vol of Simon. Am discovering the moon fairly late. I gather I shall continue perusal at great danger to bile-duets. Pere e fille Necker. UGH!!! Inferno cantos 5, 6, 7, 8 33/4 by Messire D. of Firenze. Underlying queery McN, W. speculate on boycott of senso morale and senso anagogico, despite recent admission of cleebrity in Times. all I have ever written/ and boycott of most

[1451]

23 Sep/ McN. W. Play arruv. Apart from a few minor verbal details (?) typing errors), the substance / aim and beliefs about 95% coincident with my own.

Del Mar has destroyed fable that Xtianity put of Paganism / acc / him it put out " The Worship of Aug. Caesar " ref/ vol of that title.

DelMar completely blacked out in blackout of ALL honest history. Butchart cites only the one superfluous or nugatory vol/ of Del M/.

I shd/ never have heard of him either by reading hist/ or econ/ footnote to von Humboldt, 300 vols/ of Del. to back up nearly everything I had writ/ and add VERY greatly to knowledge.

St Julien Hospitalier, motif/ plus l' Homme qui rit.

Rock found true religion among the Na Khi. Guillart spent less time up there. When I was doing paleographic Cavalcanti I found Alb/ Mag/ and the rest of the tehologians used to get at Guido's terminology, SOUND when based on gk and lat/

and a MESS whenever they cited the jew book.

The PEST, and that the new law shd/ have got rid of, galimatias, anthology of confusions and fervid rhetoric etc.

Presepio etc. all long before that.

Hence joy at chance Zielinski ( after 29 years) has chance of getting printed in english, NOT in england but still in english as the french is out of print, and Swb/ had to use fotostat.

And the Ambrose on Brahmins, that seems certain of reprint, whichever Ambrose wrote it / or whether " St A" did it before he was poisoned.

Whether Del M/ is correct re/ quantity of lands and slaves already owned by pagan temples, I hv/ not yet been abl to verify. Julian seems to have tried to do something without it. Byzantine theolog/ hogwash / struggle fmm for rents.

Anselm vs/ Wm. Rufus ( monument to the liberator somewhere near you, I belive )

By time of Bede, intelligent Xtrs protesting against concessions to judaism.

Now to agenda. You have one surviving Duke, reported to have said that the late 'Bedford was the only one of 'em whom he had ever heard say anything sensible.

But he collapses, is found staff on floor of his club/ rushed to Swiss sanatorium and has since been incommunicado so far as yr/ anon/ crspdt is concerned.

There are several y.m. whom I have TRIED to persuade to sit at the feet of McN. W., Fuller and old Domvile, apparently with no result.

2. one american prof/ aetat 30 says his generation will do anything to gether except work together.

Goacher and Ron Duncan each seems to think himself responsible for this new theatre uplift saying they mean to do any version of TRAXINIAL.

Goacher did the bylas in BBC broadcast of it.
He and his wife both in theatre,

they might see road to production.

I have NEVER had any concept of what the people of actually buy ticket
tickets to theatres will stand.

let a long so much didactic.

Believe Margarte has just had some sort of award, but forget her
stage name.

Anyhow, no harm in their seeing yr/ ms/

same goes for young Duncan, who is in contact with Harewood,
and has done useful ( I believe) writing re/ farming etc.

... cant read his verse and plays etc. but he is not filled
with malice.

IF Horton cd/ get at least part of his list into curricula
the next generation would have better chance of putting their
good will into action.

There are certain sanities which all intelligent men believe
the rest is sectarian -- priest racket. "encius, Dante,
Agassiz.

Anselm in Proslogion , where he is NOT tainted with
old texts.

Still find "Ignorance of coin, credit and circulation" as did J.
Adams / not the malvagita / woman in yester/ despairing, every
organization for decent govt. has a kike nested in it, ready
to sabotage. and people nervous of being sent to alaska for
any opposition to the Beria, Roosevelt, Baruch set up.
Star chambers etc.

p. 21 " shares his head " ?? No doubt you have curtain for 1st/ act.
at least I hadn't had suspicion of it.

"haven't got any"// good. ( Dukes have no etc. ) Heard Balfour to "ady
C/" since they have taken away every bit of power we had. "
1915 or thereabouts.

117 / nice definition , but the Xtn/ lable plastered onto such a lot of
trype that just ISN'T. / may be better send this , or
will miss the post , lose thread of discourse trying to hurry.

"ow interested ARE you in law, Blaxkstone, development from
Anselm-Wm. HUGH Rufus shindy , to Maggie Carter and U.S.
Constitution ? defiled by Roosevelt . tho trend to betrayal
started before that defilement.

1

26 Nv. Mc N.W. You seem blessed with six times my capacity for work and gt/ rapidity of production. Esp/ as you got to money later than I did, but you seem never to have heard of Kung FuTseu. Still don't see anything in yr/ king business that isn't basic in Kung, whereas King a particular implement. And you use term Xtianity as synonym for KALON kai AGATHON. After CHHH 1100 an. Augusto Dom. civic liberty pried out between Pope and rex. Anselm plugging for central control / which is decided to be irrelevant and too remote. BUT Ans/ wanting a little ethics. and yr/ neighbor Bill Rufus for swag. Glad to find corporate state on p. 275. You don't say which Colonna. nor do you mention vocational representation. In fact the lousy pinks wd/ brand you totalitarian ??( just as unjustly as they attack ANY opposition to internat-usury. ) Even an honest king IGNORANT of how the crablice have brought in kahal system wd/ be in difficulties. Swabey had a note in recent Voice, on IGNORANCE of kahal SYSTEM. Dizzy imported it to england and Wilson Woodrow clamped it onto the U.S. where the assassination of Lincoln had CHHH facilitated its arrival.

I suppose Orage had left England when you got round to $.?? and CHDoug a scotch engineer lacking deference for Kitson which wd/ have been an asset. Incidentally the Republica di Salo printed Kit's summary of Bank Conspiracy in Venice during the 600 days. IF they had left the Italian's that central section between the two armies, which was dangeled to diddle a few naive wops after Badoglio etc. bitched the Regime, one might have had at least an effective or active publishing machinery.

I can't recall any of ever recognizing my efforts in serious comment. BBC recenthy did broadcast some of my Randolph or Benton cante, but dont think they mentioned it in their papers. almost All my adult acquaintance in the U.S. died off during laBB usurers festivity.

yr/" puritan" merely IHHHH one, and of the vilest judaic injections. Milton's horrible style, prots/ incapable of smelling the stink of decaying mind. descent i.e. sinking of perception measured from Kant to Wilt

like Monds, Rothschilds,

k.t.l.

26 Nv/ continu/ Sorry but if I dont boil over, I'll bust.
My bulgarian wd identify Mr Death's protruding underlip/
Eden tried to get him murdered after he( the bulgar) got
300,000 bulgs OUT, and Eden got 'em back behind the curtain
.to their extinction. EricDrummond didn't keep golf date
after S- lent him copy of N.E.Weekly, somewhere about 1926.
my Compliments to the Surgeon. Nowt but surg/ training cd/
Iv/ got you thru description of such loathsomeness, item by
item, detail and symptom by symp, without the faintest ripple
of emotional display on yr/ part.
I remain pro-Mirabeau, unless you show me in error.
(pardon disjointed nature of these notes, but if I dont write
as they come, shall lose 'em and not be able to put 'em in
order anyhow.
parenthesis/ I suspect you in 1931 still had hang-over from free-trade
trade Anschauung. Sir J. Serrao and an ex-gov of Eritrea in '42
had learned NOTHING since Manchester, NOTHING from the Venetnno/
autarchia. J. Adams aware that home econ/ solider than mania
for foreign trade. ? How fqr Continental System ( Nap's) and
Mussolini autarchia were in concord, I dont know. They murdered
Mus/ for trying to keep Italy out of debt. Mencius might have
save him from spending money on tanks. Lies to both Mus/ and
Adolf, as to Ben VIII when the divorce was about to go through.
Trail of seppent, "adrid, Paris, London. San Angel,
Sanchez, Isa Ab/ Necker, Dizzy by passing Parliament. Woodrow W.
the damned, and FDR, cad, liar and perjurer. The king SHOULD
do no wrong.
27 Nv. p. 63
to be serious/ do you happen remeber source of yr/ statement
re/ Mirabeau question : what, government lend to itself ?
My study very sketchy, Lark etc. but I dont
recall anything as clear as that . or that became constant
query of Randolph and the clean yanks.
I'll get the Harris, if that's where it is. In fact
will get both that and old Sparks on the rasta.
Of course the colonies here had had sane money till
yr dirty bank made a rotten govt, stop it, thereby
losing the america 13.
how much of this had penetrated
europeans ? and if history of Antoninus Pius hadn't
been blotted out/ or more than two paragraphs re/ Alex
of Macedon ... meaning two that mattered.
" sheer ignorance" sd/ J. Adams " of coin, credit
AND circulation."
Wonder if you had or have seen Penton on Napoleon.
in his " 30 Years view ".
p. 99/ are you taking it that Talleyrand thought necessary
to maintain Constitutional monarchy in England in order to
have absolutism in France ???

like Monks, Rothschilds

and the rest

26 Nv/ continu/ Sorry out if I dont boil over, I'll bust.
My bulgarian wd identify Mr Death's protruding underlip/
Eden tried to get him murdered after he( the bulgar) got
300,000 bulgs OUT, and Eden got 'em back behind the curtain
to their extinction. EricDrummond didn't keep golf date
my compliments on that'sungeat.. Nowibutsang/irabang Png.
Thv/ got you thru description of such loathsomeness, item by
ritem, detail and symptom by symp, without the faintest ripple
of emotional display on yr/ part.

I suspect you in 1931 still had hang-over from free-trade
cigarette trade Anschauung. Sir J. Serrao and an ex-gov of Eritrea in '42
had learned NOTHING since Manchester, NOTHING from the Venetianio/
autarchia. J. Adams aware that home econ/ solider than mania
for foreign trade. ? How for Continental System ( Nap's) and
Mussolini autarchia were in concord, I dont know. They murdered
Mus/ for trying to keep Italy out of debt. Mencius might have
save him from spending money on tanks. Lies to both Mus/ and
Adolf, as to Ben VIII when the divorce was about to go through.
Trail of seppent, "adrid, Paris, London. San Angel,

Adolf, as to Ben VIII when the divorce was about to go through.
Sanchez, Isa Ab/ Necker, Dizzy by passing Parliament. Woodrow W.
the damned, and FDR, cad, liar and perjurer. The king SHOULD
do no wrong.

27 Nv. p. 63

My study very sketchy, LaMarck etc. but I dont
recall anything as clear as that. or that became constant
query of Randolph and the clean yanks.
I'll get the Harris, if that's where it is. In fact
will get both that and old Sparks on the rasta.

how much of this had penetrated
europeans? and if history of Antoninus Pius hadn't
been blotted out/ or more than two paragraphs re/ Alex
of Macedon ... meaning two that mattered.

"sheer ignorance" sd/ J. Adams " of coin, credit
AND circulation."

Wonder if you had or have seen Benton on Napoleon.
in his " 30 Years view ".

p. 99 / are you taking it that Talleyrand thought necessary
to maintain Constitutional monarchy in England in order to
have absolutism in France ???

I admit I was surprised that T/ was standing
for support of Brit/ Const. but wherever I got that datum it
seemed solid. Yes, it was Mme Remusat , unless I muddle.

Or did he come to it later, in Nap's time.?
next page am reminded of dutchman's funeral. NO body cd/
think of ANYthing complimentary to the deceased, till one
old buffer brought out: "Vanaal, he wvoss a goodt
schmo-o-oker. "

wd/ you say that Necker IS the revolution of decay.
or have earlier examples of character with nothing in
the way of quality breaks into top society by-
money and push ? I t. . .