中华人民共和国湖北省武汉市中级人民法院刑 事 裁 定 书（2018）鄂01刑终181号原公诉机关湖北省武汉市洪山区人民检察院。上诉人（原审被告人）萨德（英文名：ASADIJAZBHATTI），男，1995年7月31日出生，巴基斯坦国籍，湖北中医药大学国际教育学院学生，住湖北省武汉市洪山区。因涉嫌犯故意伤害罪，经武汉市公安局洪山区分局决定于2017年3月31日取保候审，经武汉市洪山区人民法院决定于2017年12月18日被执行逮捕。现羁押于武汉市洪山区看守所。辩护人罗运红、周依依，北京盈科（武汉）律师事务所律师。翻译人员冯野，武汉大学法学院硕士研究生。湖北省武汉市洪山区人民法院审理湖北省武汉市洪山区人民检察院指控原审被告人萨德犯故意伤害罪一案，于2017年12月22日作出（2017）鄂0111刑初710号刑事判决。原审被告人萨德不服，提出上诉。本院依法组成合议庭，公开开庭审理了本案。湖北省武汉市人民检察院指派检察员陈某、姚某出庭履行职务。上诉人（原审被告人）萨德及其辩护人罗运红、周依依、翻译人员冯某到庭参加诉讼。现已审理终结。原审判决认定，2017年3月17日19时许，被告人萨德在本市洪山区湖北中医药大学留学生楼三楼楼道，与同校学生阿某1（英文名：AHMADAZIZ）因琐事发生纠纷继而打斗。打斗过程中，被告人萨德将阿某1打伤，致其鼻骨骨折、双侧上颌窦额突骨折。经鉴定，阿某1的损伤程度为轻伤二级。2017年3月29日，被告人萨德主动向公安机关投案。原审认定上述事实，有下列证据予以证实：1、报案材料、抓获经过、破案经过证明：被害人阿某1报案情况及被告人萨德到案经过。2、调解协议书、意见书证明：案发后，经公安机关及湖北中医药大学组织调解，被告人萨德表示愿意支付相关医疗费用，因被害人阿某1未提交费用证明且拒绝调解，双方未能就赔付金额达成一致。3、门诊处方、收费票据、检查报告证明：被害人阿某1受伤后在湖北省人民医院治疗、检查的情况。4、证人可汗（英文名：KHANMUHAMMADMOHSINRAZA）的证言，其主要内容为：2017年3月17日晚上8点多钟，我在宿舍休息，接到同学阿某2的电话，对我说阿某1和萨德在三楼电梯口打架，当我来到电梯口时，发现阿某1脸上在流血。阿某1对我说萨德把他的鼻子和眼睛打破了，我就把他送到医院进行治疗。5、证人阿某2（英文名：ALIATIFJAMAL）的证言，其主要内容为：晚上20时许，我在湖北中医药大学留学生宿舍三楼的走廊打电话，碰到阿某1，他问我萨德住在哪个房间，我告诉他后，他一直没有离开，就在楼道等着。后萨德从中间楼梯回来了，他先是和我握了手，在经过阿某1身边时，阿某1走到他面前拦住并主动握住他的手，我注意到阿某1在握手的时候很用力，萨德叫阿某1不要这么用力握，之后两人对骂起来，我在旁边玩手机，没有想到两个人会打起来，也没有注意到谁先动手，过了一会儿我发现两个人打起来了，我赶紧过去分开两人。之后两个人没有再打了。把他们分开后，我看到阿某1的鼻子在流血，眼部周围也有血。他们打架时没有用工具，只是拳打脚踢。6、被害人阿某1的陈述，其主要内容为：我是巴基斯坦的留学生，现就读于湖北中医药大学。2017年3月17日16时20分左右，我在网络上添加一个名为Dreamna的餐馆，并且点了外卖。这时，我在学校门口看到萨德指着我评论，骂骂咧咧的，我没有理会他。19时左右我在学校留学生楼3楼的电梯口遇见萨德，我对他说以后不要在群聊里面评价我，他说他有权评论，我和他发生争执，他的情绪就有点失控了，就用拳头朝我鼻子打了一拳，导致鼻骨三块骨折，然后他继续打我，同时还用脚踢我。处于本能的自卫，我用力将他推倒，但是他爬起来后继续打我。7、武汉平安法医司法鉴定所司法鉴定意见书证明：被害人阿某1的损伤程度为轻伤二级。8、被告人萨德的供述与辩解，其主要内容为：2017年3月17日晚上7点多钟，我当时回自己的宿舍，经过3楼楼道时，碰到我的同学阿某2，我和他打了声招呼（握手），然后准备回宿舍。这时，旁边站着的阿某1突然上前握住我的右手，用力的捏。我随即把手缩回来，然后对他说，下次不要再用这么大的劲握手。阿某1问我，为什么在微信群里取笑他。我说只是开玩笑，没有取笑的意思，但你也不能骂我。我准备走时，阿某1突然用右手朝我脸上挥过来，我出于本能的反应，用右手朝他胸部一推，他的右手就打在我的左脸颊，随即，他又朝我的左脸打了一拳。我当时就用右胳膊上前将他的脖子搂着，想把他摔倒，他挣脱出来从背后抓我的脸。我用双拳朝他脸部打去，打了几拳，他也用手还击了，打到我的额头。我用拳头把他打得后退几步，我将外套脱掉，他又过来，我用右腿踢他左边身上，他将我的右腿抱住把我摔倒，接着上来要打我，我就感觉有血滴在我的脸上，我用手搂住他的脖子，将他也搞在地上，我们就在地上扭在一起。这时，阿某2看到了，就上来将我们分开，我就回宿舍了。9、鉴定人刘某经法院依法通知后出庭所作证言，证明：因被告人萨德对武汉平安法医司法鉴定所司法鉴定意见书有异议，鉴定人刘某出庭接受了被告人萨德及其辩护人的询问，对被告人萨德及辩护人的疑问进行了解答。原审认为，被告人萨德故意伤害他人身体，致一人轻伤，其行为已构成故意伤害罪。被告人萨德犯罪以后自动投案，如实供述自己的罪行，是自首，可以从轻处罚。依照《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百三十四条第一款、第六十七条第一款、第六条第一款之规定，认定被告人萨德犯故意伤害罪，判处有期徒刑九个月。上诉人萨德上诉称，1、被害人阿某1有严重过错；2、是被害人阿某1先动手，其行为属于正当防卫；3、愿意赔偿被害人阿某1的经济损失，因为被害人要求过高，故调解不成；4、自己一贯表现较好，有自首情节，请求法院对其从轻、减轻或免除处罚。其辩护人除支持上述上诉理由外，还提出原审认定的事实不清，被害人阿某1曾经遭受过车祸，且有癫痫病史，不能排除其鼻骨骨折是阿某1自己造成的。湖北省武汉市人民检察院在二审中的意见，原审认定的事实清楚、证据确实、充分，定罪准确，审判程序合法，量刑适当，萨德的上诉理由及其辩护人的意见均不能成立。建议二审法院驳回上诉，维持原判。经审理查明，上诉人萨德与被害人阿某1均系湖北中医药大学的留学生。因萨德在巴基斯坦藉学生的微信群中与阿某1开玩笑，二人产生矛盾。2017年3月17日19时许，阿某1至本市洪山区湖北中医药大学留学生楼，在三楼楼道与回宿舍的萨德发生口角继而打斗。打斗过程中，萨德将阿某1打伤，致其鼻骨骨折、双侧上颌窦额突骨折。经鉴定，阿某1的损伤程度为轻伤二级。2017年3月29日，萨德接公安人员电话通知主动投案。认定上述事实的证据，有报案材料、抓获经过、破案经过，被害人阿某1的陈述，证人可汗、阿某2及鉴定人刘某的证言，司法鉴定意见书，调解协议书、意见书，门诊处方、收费票据、检查报告，上诉人萨德的供述与辩解等证据证实。上述证据均经一、二审举证、质证，查证属实，其来源合法、有效，内容客观真实且相互印证，本院予以确认。上诉人萨德的辩护人提出原审认定的事实不清，被害人阿某1曾经遭受过车祸，且有癫痫病史，不能排除其鼻骨骨折是阿某1自己造成的。经查，原审认定萨德在与阿某1的打斗中，致使阿某1鼻骨骨折，造成轻伤二级伤害后果的事实，有被害人陈述、证人证言及病历、法医鉴定意见予以证实，足以认定。萨德的辩护人提出的此意见，无事实、证据予以支持，不能成立。上诉人萨德及其辩护人提出，被害人阿某1有严重过错。经查，本案系因萨德在微信群中与阿某1开玩笑而引发，双方见面后，又因言语不和而发生打斗，在互殴过程中萨德致阿某1鼻骨骨折，经鉴定阿某1的损伤程度属轻伤二级。故萨德及其辩护人提出阿某1有严重过错的意见，不能成立。上诉人萨德及其辩护人提出，是被害人阿某1先动手，萨德的行为属于正当防卫。经审查认为，双方在互殴中均存在伤害对方身体的故意，故萨德的行为并非是为了使本人的人身、财产和其他权利免受正在进行的不法侵害，而采取的制止不法侵害行为，其行为不符合正当防卫的构成要件。萨德的上诉理由及其辩护人的相同辩护意见，缺乏事实及法律依据，不能成立。本院认为，上诉人萨德故意伤害他人身体，致一人轻伤，其行为已构成故意伤害罪。原审认定的事实清楚，证据确实、充分，定罪准确，审判程序合法。原审根据萨德的犯罪事实、具体情节和对社会的危害程度、认罪态度，对其适用法律正确，量刑适当。萨德有自首、被害人不谅解等量刑情节，一审法院在量刑时已予以充分考虑，萨德及其辩护人请求法院对其从轻、减轻或免除处罚的上诉理由及辩护意见，无新的事实依据，本院均不予采纳。湖北省武汉市人民检察院在二审中的意见，本院予以采纳。依照《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第二百二十五条第一款第（一）项的规定，裁定如下:驳回上诉，维持原判。本裁定为终审裁定。审 判 长  袁 锐审 判 员  黄毅平审 判 员  孔 磊二〇一八年四月十六日法官助理  高苗苗书 记 员  徐滢婧TheAdjudicationofthePeople’sintermediate。Ｐｅｏｐｌｅ’ｓＲｅｐｕｂｌｉｃｏｆＣｈｉｎａＳｅｃｔｉPeople’sRepublicofChinaSectionofCriminalCourt,(2018)HubeiNo.01,FinalInstanceNO.181TheoriginalprocuratorateisHongshandistrictprocuratorateofHubeiprovinceWuhancity.TheappellantAsad(EnglishName:ASADIJAZBHATTI),male,borninJuly31,1995,Pakistannationality,passportnumberCR3178041,theInternationalEducationCollegeofHubeiTCMuniversitystudents,livedinstudentsdepartment303roomQinglingstreetHuangjiahuinHubeiprovince,Wuhancity,HongshanDistrict.Withsuspectofintentionalinjury,hewasdetainedinMarch31,2017andwasarrestedinDecember18,2017,andisnowdetainedintheHongshanDistrictdetentioncenterofWuhan.ThedefenderLuoyunhong,zhouyiyi,alawyeroftheBeijingYingke(Wuhan)lawfirm.Translator,FengYe,agraduatestudentintheLawSchoolofWuhanUniversity.HubeiprovinceWuhancityHongshanDistrictPeople'sProcuratorateinregardstocriminalprocedure,theindictmentchargestheappellantsAsadcrimeofMaliciousinjury,on10July2017bytheInstituteofpublicprosecution.Afterfilingacaseonthesameday,thecourtformedacollegialpanelandopenedthecourtfortrial.HubeiprovinceWuhancityPeople'sProcuratorateprosecutorassignedChenfeiandYaolantosupporttheprosecutionincourt,theappellantandhisdefenderLuoyunhong,Zhouyiyi,translatorFengYetakepartintheproceedings.Thiscaseisreviewedbythebenchcourtandhasbeendiscussedbythecourt'strialcommittee.Theoriginaltrialfoundthat:at19o'clockinMarch17,2017,theappellant,Asad,wasinthethirdfloorcorridoroftheoverseasstudentbuildingofHubeiUniversityoftraditionalChinesemedicineinHongshanDistrictofWuhanCity,andthenfoughtwiththesameschoolstudentAHMADAZIZfortrivialmatters.Duringthefight,theappellantAsadinjuredAHMADAZIZ,causingfractureofthenasalboneandbilateralfrontalfractureofthemaxillarysinus.ItwasidentifiedthatthedegreeofinjuryofAHMADAZIZwastwooflightinjury.InMarch29,2017,theappellant,Asad,tooktheinitiativetosubmitacasetothepublicsecurityorgan.TheTruthabovecanbeconfirmedbythefollowingevidence:1.reportmaterialsandcapturereport,provedthat:thesituationvictimAHMADAZIZreportedthecaseandhowtheappellant.2.themediationagreement,provedthat:aftertheincident,thepublicsecurityorgansandtheHubeiUniversityoftraditionalChinesemedicinemediationorganization,theappellantAsadwillingtopaymedicalexpenses,becausethevictimAHMADAZIZdidnotsubmitproofoffeesandrefusedtomediation,bothsidesfailedtoagreeontheamountofcompensation.3.theoutpatientprescription,chargebillandinspectionreportprovedthatthevictimAHMADAZIZwastreatedandcheckedinHubeiProvincialPeople'sHospitalafterinjury.4.KHANMUHAMMADMOHSINRAZA,thewitness'stestimony,themaincontentsareasfollows:March17,2017at8o'clock,Irestinthedormitory,thestudentsreceivedaphonecallfromALI,saidtomeAHMADAZIZandAsadintheelevatoronthethirdfloor.WhenIcametotheelevator,foundAHMADAZIZ'sfacewasbleeding,AHMADAZIZtoldmethatAsadbrokehisnoseandeyes,andIsenthimtothehospitalfortreatment.5.ALIATIFJAMAL,thewitness'stestimony,themaincontentsareasfollows:20pm,mystudentsdormitoryfloorinHubeiUniversityoftraditionalChinesemedicinehallcall,metAHMADAZIZ,heaskedmewhichroomAsadlived,Itoldhim,hedidnotleft,justwaitinginthecorridor.FromthemiddleofthestairsafterAsadcameback,hefirstshookhandswithmeandafterAHMADAZIZside,AHMADAZIZwenttothefrontandtaketheinitiativetostophimandholdhishand,InoticedAHMADAZIZveryhardinhand,AsadcalledAHMADAZIZdon'tsqueeze,afterthetwomatchagain,Iplaymobilephonebeside,didnotthinktwopeoplecanplaytogether,don'tpayattentiontowhosehands,afterawhileIfoundtwopeoplefight,Ihastenedtoseparatetwopeople.Afterthat,twopeopledidnotplayagain.Afterseparatingthem,IsawAHMADAZIZ'snosebleedingandbloodaroundtheeye.Notoolswhentheyfight,justacuffandkick.6.thevictimAHMADAZIZstatement,themaincontentis:IamastudentinPakistan,nowstudyingattheHubeiUniversityoftraditionalChinesemedicine.Around16:20inMarch17,2017,IaddedarestaurantcalledDreamnaontheInternetandtookoutthetakeout.Atthistime,IsawAsadasIcomment,swearingattheschoolgate,Ididnotbotherhim.Liftaround19studentsinmyschoolbuilding3floorofmouthmetAsad,Isaidtohimwillnotbeinthegroupchatinsideme,hesaidthathehastherighttocomment,Iarguewithhim,hismoodisabitoutofcontrol,withhisfistinmynose,causethreeblocksofnasalbonefracture,andthenhehitme,butalsotrytokickme.Inmyinstinctiveself-defense,Ipushedhimdown,butheclimbedandcontinuedtobeatme.7.WuhanPingAnforensicidentificationofthejudicialappraisalopinion:thevictimAHMADAZIZdamagedegreeislightinjuryleveltwo.8.theappellant’sAsad’sconfessionandstatement,itsmaincontentis:at7o'clockintheeveningofMarch17,2017,Iwentbacktomydormitory.WhenIpassedthe3floorcorridor,Imetmyclassmate,ALIATIFJAMAL,andIgreetedhim(shakinghands),thenpreparedtoreturntothedormitory.Atthistime,AHMADAZIZ,standingnexttoit,suddenlytookmyrighthandandsqueezedithard.Ithenputmyhandback,andthensaidtohim,don'tshakehandswithsuchabigstrengthnexttime.AHMADAZIZaskedmewhyIwasmakingfunofhimintheWeChatgroup.Isaiditwasjustajoke,nofun,butyoucan'tscoldme.Iamreadytogo,AHMADAZIZsuddenlywitharightonmyfacewithover,myinstinctivereaction,withhisrighthandtowardhischestpush,hithisrighthandonmyleftcheek,then,helookedintomyleftcheekapunch.Itookhisrightarmaroundhisneckandtriedtothrowhimdown,andhebrokeoutofhisbackandgrabbedmyface.Iusedtoplaywithinhisface,punches,healsofoughtbackbyhand,hitmyforehead.Ibeathimstepbackwithhisfist,Iputoffmycoat,hecametomewithhisleft,rightlegkickonmyrightleg,hewillholdmedown,thenuptohitme,Ifeltadropofbloodinmyface,Ihandhisarmsaroundhisneck,hewasalsoontheground,onthegroundwetwistedtogether.Atthistime,ALIATIFJAMALsawit,cameuptoseparateus,andIwentbacktothedorm.9.TheauthenticatorLiuJinsongcometocourttomakecourttestimony.provedthat:becausetheappellantAsadhasanyobjectiontotheWuhanpeaceofforensicmedicineforensicopinion,judgeLiuJinsongcourtacceptedtheappellantAsadandcounselaskedtheappellantAsadandcounselquestionsanswer.Theoriginaljudgementheldthat:theappellantAsad,conductedintentionalinjurytoother’sbody,whosebehaviorconstitutecrimeofmaliciousinjury,shouldbegivencriminalsanction.TheprosecutioninregardsoftheappellantBertincommitcrimeofmalicioushaveestablished.Thecourtcondemnedhiscrime.Theappellantanddefendersdefendinregardsofgivinglightercriminalsanctionisadoptedbythecourt.Aboveall,consideringthecriminalfact,natureandthehazardtothesociety,inaccordancewithArt.234(1),Art.67(1),Art.6(1)ofPeople’sRepublicofChinaCriminalLaw,thecourtjudgeasbelow:Theappellant,ASADcommitscrimeofmaliciousinjury,issentencedimprisonment9months.Thetermofimprisonmentstartsfromthejudgmentexecution.Iftheappellanthadbeentakenintocustodybeforethejudgment,adayofdetainingequaltoadayofimprisonment,whichmeanstheappellantdetentionstartfrom18thDecember2017to17thSeptember2018.TheappellantAsadappealthat:1.thevictimAzizhasseriousfaultonthisevent;2.itsAzizfightfirst,hisbehaviorisself-defense;3.heiswillingtomakerestitutionforvictim.However,thevictimdemandtomuchduetodisagreementbetweenthem;4.Hehadexcellentperformancebefore,andconfesshiscrimevoluntarily.Heappealcourttogivehimlightercriminalsanctionorexemptcriminalsanction.Besidesthereasontheappellantrequestabove,thedefenderheldthat,theoriginaljudgementiswithnoclearfact.Thevictimhadepilepsybeforeandsufferedcaraccidentonce.Thosefactorsshouldbeconsideredwhenevaluatethewoundofthevictim,thereisapossibilitythatthewoundiscausedbyvictimhimself.TheHubeiprovinceWuhancityPeople'sProcuratorateheldthat,theoriginaljudgementiswithsufficientevidenceandclearfact.Beside,theprocessofjudgmentislegitimate,theevaluationofjudgmentisproper.ThereasonsofAsadandhisdefenderarenotestablished.Theprocuratoratesuggestthecourtaffirmtheoriginaljudgementandrejecttheappeal.Thelawfulinvestigateshowedthat:theappellantAsadandtheVitimAzizarealltheoverseasstudentofHubeiChinesemedicineuniversity.AsadwasjokinginPakistan’sWeChatgroupwithAziz,thatcausesomecontradictionbetweenthem.Duringthefight,theappellantAsadinjuredAHMADAZIZ,causingfractureofthenasalboneandbilateralfrontalfractureofthemaxillarysinus.ItwasidentifiedthatthedegreeofinjuryofAHMADAZIZwastwooflightinjury.InMarch29,2017,theappellant,Asad,confesshimselftopoliceofficebyphone.TheevidenceabovecanbeconfirmedbyCasematerial,Captureprocess,Casebreakingprocess,StatementofAziz,TestimoniesofKhanandAli,Authenticator‘sworkofLiujinsong,judicialauthentication,Descriptionandreceipt.Theevidenceabovehasbeencorss-examedandheldfromfirsttrialtosecondtrial,whichhadlegitimatesources,canbeprovedbyeachother.Thus,thecourtconfirmedalltheevidenceabove.InregardswiththeAsadandhisdefender’sopinionthatthevictimAzizhadseriousfault,thecourtmadeinvestigation.Thecourtfoundthat,thecaseswascausedbyAsad’sjokinginWeChatgroup.Whentheymeteachother,theyfoughtbecausesomespeechconflict.ItisAsadwhomadeAzizinjuredwithnosebonebroken,theauthenticationshowthatitslightwoundtwodegree.Thus,theopinionheldbyAsadandhisdefenderisnotestablished.InregardswiththeAsadandhisdefender’sopinionthatitsVictimAzizfoughtfirst,sothattheAsad’sbehaviorisself-defense,thecourtmadeinvestigation.Thecourtfoundthat,intheprocessofthefighting,bothpartieshadintentiontoinjureeachother,thus,Asad’sbehaviorisnotconstituteSelf-defense,becausethereisnopurgingillegalharmtohim.Thus,theopinionheldbyAsadandhisdefenderisnotestablished.Thecourtheldthat,theappellantAsad,conductedintentionalinjurytoother’sbody,whosebehaviorconstitutecrimeofmaliciousinjury,shouldbegivencriminalsanction.Theoriginaljudgmenthadconfirmedclearfactandsufficientevidencewithlegitimatetrialproceeding.Theoriginalcourthadconsideredallthefactorswhichcangivelighercriminalsanctions,thereisnonewevidence,thusthecourtwontadopttheappellantappeal.ThecourtadoptthetheHubeiprovinceWuhancityPeople'sProcuratorate’sopinion.Accordingtothe“People’sRepublicofChinaCriminalProceduralLaw”Art.225(1)1,thecourtadjudicatethat:Rejecttheappealandaffirmtheoriginaljudgement.TheAdjudicationisFinalAdjucitation.Presidingjudge:YuanruiJudge:HuangyipingJudge:Konglei16th,April,2018Judgeassistant:GaomiaomiaoCourtClerk:Xuyingjing