浙江省宁波市中级人民法院 民 事 裁 定 书 （2019）浙02民终2597号 上诉人：于学花，女，1962年2月9日出生，汉族，住江苏省邳州市。 被上诉人：戴建平，男，1968年5月31日出生，汉族，住浙江省宁海县。 被上诉人：华安财产保险股份有限公司宁海支公司，住所地浙江省宁波市跃龙街道气象北路326-1、326-2。 法定代表人：石学文。00000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0400000020000000 上诉人于学花被上诉人戴建平被上诉人华安财产保险股份有限公司宁海支公司机动车交通事故责任纠纷一案，不服宁海县人民法院（2019）浙0226民初1759号民事判决，向本院提起上诉。本院依法组成合议庭对本案进行了审理。本案现已审理终结。 于学花上诉请求：e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0400000020000000。事实和理由：08d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0400000020000000。 戴建平、华安财产保险股份有限公司宁海支公司辩称，0008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0400000020000000。 、、述称，……(概述原审原告/被告/第三人陈述意见)。 于学花向一审法院起诉请求：08d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0400000020000000。一审法院认定事实：08d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0400000020000000。一审法院认为。判决：08d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b040000002000000008d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0400000020000000。 本院审理查明，……(写明与驳回起诉有关的事实)。 本院认为：……(写明驳回起诉的理由)。依照《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国民事诉讼法〉的解释》第三百三十条规定，裁定如下： 一、撤销宁海县人民法院（2019）浙0226民初1759号民事判决； 二、驳回于学花(写明一审原告的姓名或名称)的起诉。 一审案件受理费……元，退还(一审原告)于学花；上诉人于学花预交的二审案件受理费0.00元予以退还。 本裁定为终审裁定。 审判长     审判员     审判员     二〇一九年六月二十一日 书记员